A Rough Draft Of the *Correct* Rules Of Conduct
Anonymous Sender
eelbas...@excite.com wrote:
> By the way, boys, I apologize in advance, but in throwing
away the naughty
> French version of Reliable, and going back to the good old
American
> version, I neglected to say that I make no representations
as to the length
> of time that will pass before I again embrace the
delectable French
> Reliable.
<sigh> Stray Cat, Ziggy, Champerty, and all the others out
there who don't seem to be able to recognize a troll; there
are those who are doing their utmost to keep all of this
going, and you are playing straight man to their jokes.
This troll is merely an asshole. He is however, successful
in making complete fools of you.
Peter Palfrader
> This troll is merely an asshole. He is however, successful
> in making complete fools of you.
Hardly a troll:
> gpg: Signature made Fri Jul 7 02:14:17 2000 CEST using RSA key ID 016AA63D
> gpg: Good signature from "eelbash <eel...@bigfoot.com>"
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
> gpg: Fingerprint: 1C F9 97 48 B3 C3 32 02 97 AB 79 D9 B4 87 3B 22
key 016AA63D is in fact the key of the eelbash remailer it self.
I don't beleave eelbash has been compromised so there is only one
possibility left.
yours,
peter
--
http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~ppalfrad
[ not signed since this is an untrusted box ]
Roadkill
> Eelbash is runnning Reliable, and was running Frog's patched version
> of same to do whatever monitoring he was doing.
>
> What will need to happen, if Eeelbash wants to monitor in the future
> and play by the rules, is to make additional patches to the code to
> allow for inclusion of 'mon' and 'filter' into the caps string.
I wonder if there was a reason RProcess didn't allow those options by
default. I think it is more the responsibility of the remailer lists to
report 'mon' if they want to. 'Operator is /known/ to monitor messages'
I remember from the old stats lists. You don't have to trust the
individual remailer operators to admit this (or even worse, block them
otherwise).
What would be nice, is to put a lot of 'objectionable' words in the ping
messages the remailer lists use. So their stats will drop to zero by
their own filtering, while the stats of other remailers do not. Not
totally fair, but I think remops like Eelbash deserve things like this
coming to them :-) They could always object to this and include a footer
about this in their messages. Just like the former Thunder Byte
Anti-Virus objected to the disableing of 'heuristic' scanning when
detecting virussus. It was the smallest and fastest AV product even! To
bad they where taken over by Norman, I haven't checked out their AV
product yet. I use <www.avp.com> freeware for DOS (yet another hint
about my identity! I wish I stopped doing that).
Roadkill
--
"I'm gonna be a girl serial killer. DESTROY. It's alright. I give life.
I take life" - Hanin Elias