An Ape Gunned-Down Eve Carson, Anyone Surprised?
Way Back Jack
a brilliant pre-med student. Cops have a picture of the ape as he was
using her ATM card but haven't yet apprehended him.
I met Eve's parents through some relatives of my wife. Really nice
people and now they have to deal with this the rest of their days.
_________
http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/stories/2008/03/08/unc_0309_web2.html
Carson remembered as "one of a kind"
(SNIP)
Patrick Coghlan
> Eve Carson who was student body president at Univ. North Carolina was
> a brilliant pre-med student. Cops have a picture of the ape as he was
> using her ATM card but haven't yet apprehended him.
>
> I met Eve's parents through some relatives of my wife. Really nice
> people and now they have to deal with this the rest of their days.
The sad thing is, there will be thousands more killings like this as
long as handguns are legal in the US.
Something like a shotgun for home defense? Sure. But making handguns
available to people with sub-90 IQs who don't care about destroying
lives will ensure that this type of thing goes on forever.
Way Back Jack
wrote:
>Way Back Jack wrote:
>> Eve Carson who was student body president at Univ. North Carolina was
>> a brilliant pre-med student. Cops have a picture of the ape as he was
>> using her ATM card but haven't yet apprehended him.
>>
>> I met Eve's parents through some relatives of my wife. Really nice
>> people and now they have to deal with this the rest of their days.
>
>The sad thing is, there will be thousands more killings like this as
>long as handguns are legal in the US.
A sadder thing is that trying to outlaw handguns will be as effective
as trying to outlaw dope.
SOLUTION: Everyone should be required to carry handguns.
This girl should have had one
jaona...@nowhere.com
On 8-Mar-2008, Patrick Coghlan <ne...@coghlan.ca> wrote:
> The sad thing is, there will be thousands more killings like this as
> long as handguns are legal in the US.
Ban handguns and only niggers with have handguns
arm every man and woman above the age of 18 teach them how to shoot, what a
threat is and what it is not bring back self defense classes in public
schools
what has happened to the men in this country?
Smirnoff
<jaona...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:47d38a83$0$25201$ec3e...@news.usenetmonster.com
What about the ones under 18? Do you plan on providing an armed bodyguard
to protect everyone that is to young to carry? Do you plan on having guards
in all the playgrounds? What about theaters and day care schools? Do you
plan on having armed police on every corner on every street where children
walk to and from school? Man you are one whacked out groups of loony tunes
and just to stupid to see it aren't you?
Guns should be kept away from gun nuts like you most of all.
NiggydaHoe
"Smirnoff" <Unl...@unlisted.com> wrote in message
news:g2OAj.1677$lU5...@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net...
> this country with handguns and other weapons.
Instead, you think those who would fight back with a handgun "nuts".
Where are your inferential skills? No one is advocating shooting anyone and
everyone at will. On the contrary, SELF-DEFENSE on any kind is a NATURAL
and HUMAN right endorse by law of God, man, and instinct.
Take the guns away from CRIMINALS--in the context of this group NIGGERS--and
you need not worry about the misuse of guns by their would-be victims.
You call us "nuts".
We call those two lovely white girls "corpses" and "victims" of VIOLENT
NIGGER CRIME.
Starts shooting the CRIMINAL niggers. You have not time to criticize the
victims of murderous nigger CRIME.
May you and your love ones by victims of black racist nigger CRIME.
Smirnoff
"NiggydaHoe" <Niggy...@nappyhead.net> wrote in message
news:bxPAj.5392$%15....@bignews7.bellsouth.net
None of you gun nuts have even started to address my points and you never
will be able to. How are you going to protect the ones that are not allowed
to carry guns like the examples I give you? Will you post armed guards at
every bus stop? Will all your wives carry a gun in their purses? How will
you know that a woman going for her cell phone is not reaching for a gun?
Will everyone then go for their handgun to make sure some nut is not going
to shoot up the place? You nuts just don't get it do you? You can't arm
everyone like you think can you?
Your delutions that "NIGGERS" are the problem is a perfect example of how
loony you gun nuts can be.
Way Back Jack
wrote:
Actually, niggers at 13% of the population commit 50% of the street
crime.
Yeah, I'd say thay are a disproportionately significant part of the
problem.
Way Back Jack
>what has happened to the men in this country?
We've been brainwashed by 50 years of left-wing political correctness.
We're becoming like the the pansy-assed Euro twits. Whites in
general, not just the men, would sooner cut our own children's throats
than risk being called "racist."
Fuck *that* shit.
_ G O D _
"Way Back Jack" <here@home> wrote
news:47d3daa7...@news.newsguy.com...
>
>
> ...niggers at 13% of the population
> commit 50% of the street crime.
The fact that they make more than half of the
US prisons' population is only proving that in
US, a color-coded slavery is perpetuated by
ongoing policy of blatant hypocrisy. Because
the predatory incarceration industry needs to
exploit their slave labor, in order for US gulag
economy and completely corrupt and criminal
Judicial System to continue to be functional....
--
_____________________________________________________
I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers
and other beneficiaries of the institutionalized slavery and genocide.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvees, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts
sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
___________________________________________________
--
Smirnoff
"_ G O D _" <DEM...@TELUS.NET> wrote in message
news:l9SAj.72031$FO1.7633@edtnps82
> "Way Back Jack" <here@home> wrote
> news:47d3daa7...@news.newsguy.com...
>>
>>
>> ...niggers at 13% of the population
>> commit 50% of the street crime.
>
>
> The fact that they make more than half of the
> US prisons' population is only proving that in
> US, a color-coded slavery is perpetuated by
> ongoing policy of blatant hypocrisy. Because
> the predatory incarceration industry needs to
> exploit their slave labor, in order for US gulag
> economy and completely corrupt and criminal
> Judicial System to continue to be functional....
>
IOW none of you racist gun loons can post anything that actually shows
arming everyone is in any way an answer towards protection. You obviously
have no children of your own and that is the good news. You don't breed.
Jimbo
wrote:
>>
> IOW none of you racist gun loons can post anything that actually shows
>arming everyone is in any way an answer towards protection. You obviously
>have no children of your own and that is the good news. You don't breed.
>
Tell it to those homeowners who have killed burglars.
Bet they'd have been less "protected" without their shootin' irons.
And if Eve Carson had been armed and trained, might've been a
different outcome.
Fucking liberals like y'self oughta be exterminated; you're
excusemaking contributes to the problem.
Jimbo
wrote:
>
>"Way Back Jack" <here@home> wrote
>news:47d3daa7...@news.newsguy.com...
>>
>>
>> ...niggers at 13% of the population
>> commit 50% of the street crime.
>
>
>The fact that they make more than half of the
>US prisons' population
Actually it's
http://www.hrw.org/backgrounder/usa/incarceration/
2003:
Blacks = 43.91%
Law enforcement is not doing it's job.
Need toget the rate up to 50%
Or do what China does, kill 'em.
Yeah, thereare 68 different types of capital punishment offenses in
China. Even for non-violent stuff.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-11-01-china-executions_x.htm
China was responsible for 81% of the world's known executions — 1,770
out of 2,184 — last year, according to Amnesty International. Amnesty
said the actual number of executions in China could be several times
higher. In the USA, 60 people were executed in 2005.
Human rights groups and Chinese legal scholars have criticized the
Chinese government for excessive use of the death penalty and for
carrying out some executions after sham trials. Sixty-eight offenses —
including non-violent crimes such as tax evasion, drug smuggling and
corruption — carry the death penalty.(snip)
Smirnoff
"Jimbo" <mellow@home> wrote in message
news:47d3fb54...@news.usenetmonster.com
You are the one that is screwed on very loosely and can not address any of
the issues about protection. You offer nothing to prove more guns means
better safety. How do you protect the ones that are to young to be armed?
You can not answer this and only reply by crying that someone wants to take
away your right to be a gun loon. You are nothing but a coward if you can't
answer a simple question. Now run along now and hide behind your delusions
about offering a safer society as you are nothing but a simple minded
buffoon.
_ G O D _
news:MDSAj.1683$lU5....@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net...
And what exactly did I say to call me a "racist
gun loon" and "having not children," - in order
for you to insist that I shouldn't protect myself?
Jasper PNL, Ltd.
I'll take you up on that, bucko
> How are you going to protect the ones that are not allowed
> to carry guns like the examples I give you?
they rely on other HUMANS to do it........for shit's sake, no one ever
advocated arming 5 year olds, read what it says, not what you wish it said
>Will you post armed guards at
> every bus stop?
you don't get it do you Braniac ? once there exists the possibility of ANY
law-abiding citizen being armed, niggerz and other criminals no long feel
safe in terrorizing the general populance, because they don't know if
someone behind them will blow their ass away if they try their shit
>Will all your wives carry a gun in their purses?
and the problem with that is ????
>How will you know that a woman going for her cell phone is not reaching
for a gun?
common sense tells us that, but you assume the worst in every case, don't
you, Mr. Gun-Control ?
> Will everyone then go for their handgun to make sure some nut is not going
> to shoot up the place?
so everyone 'goes for their gun'......so what ? no one is going to shoot
until they assess the situation...this is called 'TRAINING'
>You nuts just don't get it do you?
can't refute the arguement, go for insults.............not unexpected from
an asshole
>You can't arm everyone like you think can you?
are you asking or telling ?
> Your delutions that "NIGGERS" are the problem is a perfect example of how
> loony you gun nuts can be.
no, it is observation based on experience, idiot
Jimbo
wrote:
Read the response form Jasper.
If you have any problems with the words, let me know, weeenie.
_ G O D _
news:47d3fb5c...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>
>
> ....do what China does, kill 'em.
>
...<snip>...redundant crap has been carefully removed....
I'm surprised that you are still stand alive. Because by
Chinese standards, you should have been executed a
while ago, sadistic COck-sucker. - For both your traits...
Jimbo
wrote:
>"Jimbo" <mellow@home> wrote
>news:47d3fb5c...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>>
>>
>> ....do what China does, kill 'em.
>>
>
>...<snip>...redundant crap has been carefully removed....
Redundant crap reinserted: Whine to the gooks; they perform 81% of
the executions.
And those are just the ones that we know about.
> COck-sucker.
You didn't fall far from your momma's apple tree.
>I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers
You want to corner the market on cock sucking?
Smirnoff
"_ G O D _" <DEM...@TELUS.NET> wrote in message
news:VfTAj.72047$FO1.49988@edtnps82
> "Smirnoff" <Unl...@unlisted.com> wrote
> news:MDSAj.1683$lU5....@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net...
>>
>>
>> "_ G O D _" <DEM...@TELUS.NET> wrote in message
>> news:l9SAj.72031$FO1.7633@edtnps82
>>> "Way Back Jack" <here@home> wrote
>>> news:47d3daa7...@news.newsguy.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ...niggers at 13% of the population
>>>> commit 50% of the street crime.
>>>
>>>
>>> The fact that they make more than half of the
>>> US prisons' population is only proving that in
>>> US, a color-coded slavery is perpetuated by
>>> ongoing policy of blatant hypocrisy. Because
>>> the predatory incarceration industry needs to
>>> exploit their slave labor, in order for US gulag
>>> economy and completely corrupt and criminal
>>> Judicial System to continue to be functional....
>>>
>> IOW none of you racist gun loons can post anything that
>> actually shows arming everyone is in any way an answer
>> towards protection. You obviously have no children of
>> your own and that is the good news. You don't breed.
>
>
> And what exactly did I say to call me a "racist
> gun loon" and "having not children," - in order
> for you to insist that I shouldn't protect myself?
> --
The thread is about racist gun loons and their beliefs. You think there is
a "predatory incarceration industry". If this is not racist then what is it?
I never said you didn't have any right to protect yourself. I just want
someone to explain how more guns equates to a safer public if all you are
concerned about is protecting you and can not address the issue of
protecting those that are unable to secure a weapon. You can't offer
protection to your children so you must not have any or any concern about
those that do. You gun loons only seem concerned about your fear of not
being able to protect yourselves against the bogeyman.
Jimbo
The only institutional racism is directed toward whites in the form of
affirmative action policis for "priority" minorities.
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:01:20 -0400, "Smirnoff" <Unl...@unlisted.com>
wrote:
Smirnoff
"Jasper PNL, Ltd." <jasp...@noniggs.com> wrote in message
news:DHTAj.4920$FG2.52@trndny08
You are the idiot here and that is easy to see. You are the one that has
been bitch slapped because you have no answers. All you can do is cry that
someone is out there that wants your gun. You did not answer question one
about how you are going to offer protection to those that are to young to
carry a weapon. You ran from the idea that someone can kill someone on the
streets and can not point to how this will not happen.
Answer this coward.
How do you protect those in areas where there are no armed adults like a
school playground or a bus stop? Do you post armed guards everywhere? If you
can start here then we can move on to harder questions.
Jimbo
Of course you cannot have 100% protection. There're no guarantees in
life.
What a pansy; next thing you'll be telling your country's military to
fight with fists.
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 12:09:09 -0400, "Smirnoff" <Unl...@unlisted.com>
wrote:
Way Back Jack
>
>
>Of course you cannot have 100% protection. There're no guarantees in
>life.
>
>What a pansy; next thing you'll be telling your country's military to
>fight with fists.
Yeah, during WWII, when the Japs bombed Pearl and Germany declared war
on us four days later, we shoulda fought 'em with fists.
Yassah, our fists will protect us.
Just like they'll protect us when an armed savage invades our home or
accosts us on the street.
_ G O D _
news:47d40b38...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>
>
>
> The only institutional racism is directed toward whites in
> the form of affirmative action policis for "priority" minorities.
If americunts are not taught about the
Human Rights, then how in the world
they can know that affirmative action
is actually in violation of the universal
Human Rights, which is against all of
the race-based discrimination, or the
privilege imposed by the government?...
Jasper PNL, Ltd.
there are always adults on playgrounds and at bus stops
and what's this gibberish: "You ran from the idea that someone can kill
someone on the streets and can not point to how this will not happen."
WTF is THAT supposed to mean ?
once YOU stop the intellectual dishonesty, we can discuss it, anyone can see
that you are throwing up straw men and have no real objections
thanks for the laughs, FOOL
Mr Wonderful
YOUR NUTTY THINKING. YOU NIGGER LOVER
rigger
> "_ G O D _" <DEMI...@TELUS.NET> wrote in messagenews:VfTAj.72047$FO1.49988@edtnps82
>
>
>
> > "Smirnoff" <Unli...@unlisted.com> wrote
> >news:MDSAj.1683$lU5....@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net...
>
> >> "_ G O D _" <DEMI...@TELUS.NET> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
Gun haters like yourself are, almost by definition, sick people.
You seem to harbor a morbid facination with crime and the
results (witness the list of immature groups you attend).
If you sick folks would just take your heads, out of where-
ever you're hiding them and just look around, you'd see the
level of crime in our society is no fantasy. You read the same
newspapers we do, watch the same TV, listen to the same
radio programs (more or less), so what causes the differences
in opinion?????
I believe the difference is in the mental and emotional make-up
of the individual, and more importantly, how an individual re-
sponds to perceived threats. There are those, lets call them
"gun owners" who believe when a "moment of truth" arrives,
they will be prepared to deal with it in such a manner as will
protect themsefves and their loved ones. These "gun owners"
know there may not be time to call local police to resolve a
deadly situation or, if called, realize it may require precious
minutes, and any "bad guys" know this as well.
Then there are the "gun haters" who, even to save their own
life, or that of a loved one, are esentially unable to touch
a gun and instead retreat to the thought that "police will
get here soon" and leave the fate of their lives and those
of loved ones, to "luck." This is exactly the actions of the
huge schools of sardines and other feeder fish when attacked
by preditors. They form their schools in a large globular
mass and the sharks, etc. are free to kill as many and as
long as they wish and the sardines, because of their large
numbers, continue to survive. This IS a valid survival meth-
od for sardines and similar cold blooded animals.
So what is it??? Are you human (man or woman) enough
to defend yourself and loved ones if threatened, or are you
a sardine.
dennis
in nca
Jimbo
wrote:
>"Jimbo" <mellow@home> wrote
>news:47d40b38...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>>
>>
>>
>> The only institutional racism is directed toward whites in
>> the form of affirmative action policis for "priority" minorities.
>
>
>If americunts are not taught about the
>Human Rights,
Americans practice Human Rights *excessively* to the point that they
coddle animals.
Preach to the Africoon who gunned-down Eve Carson about her Human
Rights.
Smirnoff
"Jasper PNL, Ltd." <jasp...@noniggs.com> wrote in message
news:npUAj.2407$ox3.738@trndny04
You are the fool if you think there is always an armed civilian there to
protect everyone. Man you are one lame moron aren't you? You think there is
someone with a gun at every school to stop some gun nut from going on a
rampage. What a loon. I guess you would have the 18 year olds be the ones
wit the guns that will protect the 17 year olds that are unarmed. Your
scenario will never work jackass.
Jasper PNL, Ltd.
Smirnoff
"Mr Wonderful" <ran...@netcom.com> wrote in message
news:K6-dnTzC7elNiUna...@giganews.com
> HEY QUEERRNOFF A NIGGER WILL SHOOT OR KNIFE YO' AZZ ONE
> DAY JUST FOR YOUR NUTTY THINKING. YOU NIGGER LOVER
>
I love it when you loons go ballistic. Take a break and go out in back of
your trailer and shoot off a few. You will feel much better when you pop
another frosty and tell yourself that I am the one that is sick. Works for
you doesn't it?
Wahahahaha...........
Jasper PNL, Ltd.
is that your best response, boy ?
the old 'trailer' and 'beer' flickers (can't call them 'flames', they are
too pathetic)
_ G O D _
news:kRTAj.1685$lU5...@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net...
>
>
> "_ G O D _" wrote
> news:VfTAj.72047$FO1.49988@edtnps82
>> "Smirnoff" <Unl...@unlisted.com> wrote
>> news:MDSAj.1683$lU5....@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net...
>>>
>>>
>>> news:l9SAj.72031$FO1.7633@edtnps82
>>>> "Way Back Jack" <here@home> wrote
>>>> news:47d3daa7...@news.newsguy.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ...niggers at 13% of the population
>>>>> commit 50% of the street crime.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The fact that they make more than half of the
>>>> US prisons' population is only proving that in
>>>> US, a color-coded slavery is perpetuated by
>>>> ongoing policy of blatant hypocrisy. Because
>>>> the predatory incarceration industry needs to
>>>> exploit their slave labor, in order for US gulag
>>>> economy and completely corrupt and criminal
>>>> Judicial System to continue to be functional....
>>>>
>>> IOW none of you racist gun loons can post anything that
>>> actually shows arming everyone is in any way an answer
>>> towards protection. You obviously have no children of
>>> your own and that is the good news. You don't breed.
>>
>>
>> And what exactly did I say to call me a "racist
>> gun loon" and "having not children," - in order
>> for you to insist that I shouldn't protect myself?
>> --
> The thread is about racist gun loons and their beliefs. You think there is a
> "predatory incarceration industry". If this is not racist then what is it?
My comment about the predatory incarceration
industry is pertaining to violation of the Human
Rights (to life, liberty and justice) for purpose of
unfair and illegal capitalization from exploitation
of slave labor of the victims of the prison system
(by its beneficiaries), rather than being a racist
comment of any kind. But its clear slant toward
incarceration of high number blacks over otehr
races, is indicating that completely corrupt and
criminal US Judicial System is the one which is
being traditionally racist primarily against blacks...
> I never said you didn't have any right to protect yourself. I just want someone to
> explain how more guns equates to a safer public if all you are concerned about is
> protecting you and can not address the issue of protecting those that are unable to
> secure a weapon. You can't offer protection to your children so you must not have
> any or any concern about those that do. You gun loons only seem concerned about
> your fear of not being able to protect yourselves against the bogeyman.
There are so many ways to protects yourself,
as well as the methods to destroy a person.
But one doesn't equal to another in any way.
Therefore, I agree with you on redundancy of
using the gun, which is an obvious overkill in
many situations, where use of lethal weapon
is usually justified after the fact (after a killing).
Because for what I know, such justification of
killing (in self-defense) is being accepted by
court, even if falsely claimed for convenience
of the court, - in order to provide impunity for
a crime of killing.
Because I believe that every killing should be
prosecuted equally, regardless of the reason
for the killing of person, and must have a set
price, estimated in dollar-value...
And, for the record, I am not taking sides in
the dispute about people having a personal
choice of having or using a gun for purpose
of protection or assault against others, - for
that matter. Because in both cases it's illegal,
as far as I'm concerned. And I don't suggest
committing a crime, if you ask me. But being
a realist, I'm quite aware that my suggestion
can be ignored, and may not play any role in
other individuals' own decisions and actions...
--
---
_____________________________________________________
I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers
along with all institutions of the industrialized slavery and genocide.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvies, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
Way Back Jack
wrote:
Straight from the 1963 Whigger Handbook.
_ G O D _
news:47d40a24...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>
> "_ G O D _" wrote:
>
>>"Jimbo" <mellow@home> wrote
>>news:47d3fb5c...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>>>
>>>
>>> ....do what China does, kill 'em.
>>>
>>
>>...<snip>...redundant crap has been carefully removed....
>
> Redundant crap reinserted: Whine to the
> gooks; they perform 81% of the executions.
>
> And those are just the ones that we know about.
So, what's your point, COck-sucker? Because
it is not a secret that Chinks are also profiting
from international sale of organs harvested by
executing defenseless hostages, fallen victims
to totally corrupt and criminal Judicial System...
--
_____________________________________________________
I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers
Mr Wonderful
Way Back Jack wrote:
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:52:25 -0400, "Smirnoff" <Unl...@unlisted.com> wrote:
"Mr Wonderful" <ran...@netcom.com> wrote in message news:K6-dnTzC7elNiUna...@giganews.com
HEY QUEERRNOFF A NIGGER WILL SHOOT OR KNIFE YO' AZZ ONE DAY JUST FOR YOUR NUTTY THINKING. YOU NIGGER LOVER
:-[ JACKASS LIBERAL RESPONSE BELOW:
I love it when you loons go ballistic. Take a break and go out in back of your trailer and shoot off a few. You will feel much better when you pop another frosty and tell yourself that I am the one that is sick. Works for you doesn't it? Wahahahaha...........
Patrick Coghlan
> On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 18:59:15 -0500, Patrick Coghlan <ne...@coghlan.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> Way Back Jack wrote:
>>> Eve Carson who was student body president at Univ. North Carolina was
>>> a brilliant pre-med student. Cops have a picture of the ape as he was
>>> using her ATM card but haven't yet apprehended him.
>>>
>>> I met Eve's parents through some relatives of my wife. Really nice
>>> people and now they have to deal with this the rest of their days.
>> The sad thing is, there will be thousands more killings like this as
>> long as handguns are legal in the US.
>
> as trying to outlaw dope.
>
> SOLUTION: Everyone should be required to carry handguns.
>
> This girl should have had one
Well, there are 2 schools of thought: everyone carry a gun, or NO handguns.
As a parent, I think the latter would create a very dangerous
environment. I may have thought differently when I was a single
20-something, but not now.
Patrick Coghlan
>> long as handguns are legal in the US.
>
>
> arm every man and woman above the age of 18 teach them how to shoot, what a
> threat is and what it is not bring back self defense classes in public
> schools
>
> what has happened to the men in this country?
Why not just get RID of the handguns altogether, except for law enforcement?
If they're not eliminated, this kind of story will continue to happen
for the next 100 years.
OGExtremeOne
-- THE MORE YOU CAN GET *COLOREDS* TO READ, THE SOONER *THEY* FIND OUT THAT *THEY* ARE JUST *CONSPICUOUSLY EXPLOITED* *COLOREDS* WHICH ARE *BLACK* *STUPID NIGGERS*. (*JUMPIN BEAN EXTREME*) OGExtr...@dizum.com What Is a "*black stupid Nigger*" ? By *Dre Z.(dogg) Turdd* http://hnn.us/articles/1221.html OGExtr...@dizum.com
Jimbo
wrote:
>"Jimbo" <mellow@home> wrote
>news:47d40a24...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>>
>> "_ G O D _" wrote:
>>
>>>"Jimbo" <mellow@home> wrote
>>>news:47d3fb5c...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ....do what China does, kill 'em.
>>>>
>>>
>>>...<snip>...redundant crap has been carefully removed....
>>
>> Redundant crap reinserted: Whine to the
>> gooks; they perform 81% of the executions.
>>
>> And those are just the ones that we know about.
>
>So, what's your point,
Whine to the Chinese.
They need a good lesson in Human Rights.
Of course, whining to them is liable to get you the death penalty
>COck-suck?
Your mama gets first dibs.
Way Back Jack
wrote:
>jaona...@nowhere.com wrote:
>> On 8-Mar-2008, Patrick Coghlan <ne...@coghlan.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> The sad thing is, there will be thousands more killings like this as
>>> long as handguns are legal in the US.
>>
>> Ban handguns and only niggers with have handguns
>>
>> arm every man and woman above the age of 18 teach them how to shoot, what a
>> threat is and what it is not bring back self defense classes in public
>> schools
>>
>> what has happened to the men in this country?
>
>Why not just get RID of the handguns altogether, except for law enforcement?
Why not get rid of drugs altogther?
Same answer; it can't be done.
>If they're not eliminated, this kind of story will continue to happen
>for the next 100 years.
No, it will happen as long as there is homo sapiens.
And as this blue rock gets more and more crowded, it will increase.
_ G O D _
news:47d41f20...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>
> "_ G O D _" wrote:
>
>>"Jimbo" <mellow@home> wrote
>>news:47d40b38...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> affirmative action policis for "priority" minorities.
>>
>>
>>If americunts are not taught about the Human Rights,
>
> Americans practice Human Rights *excessively*
> to the point that they coddle animals.
>
> Preach to the Africoon who gunned-down Eve
> Carson about her Human Rights.
But isn't he a product of COmpletely COrrupt and
criminal Judicial System of COck-sucking sadistic
americunts' culture, - just like you - and many other
sadistic COck-sucking americunt retards, in order
for him to be able to do, what he has committed?
But If you do not like him so much, - to the point of
calling him an animal, and an ape, then why he is
being kept at extravagant cost to the tax-payers?
Because, from where I am looking at it, he should
not be allowed to stay a minute longer in the same
country as his victims, and americunts should not
allow their government to misuse their tax-dollars
on perpetuation of the predatory prison industry,
that is being a shelter for those who don't respect
the rights of others, in addition to perpetuating the
slavery and genocide against the US population...
Jimbo
wrote:
>"Jimbo" <mellow@home> wrote
>news:47d41f20...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>>
>> "_ G O D _" wrote:
>>
>>>"Jimbo" <mellow@home> wrote
>>>news:47d40b38...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ... racism is directed toward whites in the form of
>>>> affirmative action policis for "priority" minorities.
>>>
>>>
>>>If americunts are not taught about the Human Rights,
>>
>> Americans practice Human Rights *excessively*
>> to the point that they coddle animals.
>>
>> Preach to the Africoon who gunned-down Eve
>> Carson about her Human Rights.
>
>But isn't he a product of COmpletely COrrupt and
>criminal Judicial System
No, he's the product of moral bankruptcy from poor parenting
aided-and-abetted by excusemaking shitbirds like yourself.
> COck-suck?
Your mother's not finished.
_ G O D _
news:47d44391...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>
> "_ G O D _" wrote:
>
>>
>>But isn't he a product of COmpletely
>>COrrupt and criminal Judicial System...
>
> No, he's the product of moral bankruptcy from poor parenting
> aided-and-abetted by excuse making shitbirds like yourself.
You are obviously trying to avoid answering to the
question, which is only one of many you faced in
quite a few of my previous posts. Is that how you're
dealing with problems you are facing? Blaming it
on those, who are offering you a valid solution to
an old and ongoing problem of wasting taxpayers
money for perpetuation of slavery and genocide -
in their disservice and in violation of their Rights?
Because I am quite sure about the fact that "Ape"
is obviously a product of COmpletely COrrupt and
criminal Judicial System of COck-sucking sadistic
americunts' culture, - just like you - and many other
sadistic COck-sucking americunt retards, in order
for him to be able to commit what he's committed...
You're the one suggested I should preach to him.
But If you do not like him so much, - to the point of
calling him an animal, and an ape, then why he is
being kept at extravagant cost to the tax-payers?
Because, from where I am looking at it, he should
not be allowed to stay a minute longer in the same
country as his victims, and americunts should not
allow their government to misuse their tax-dollars
on perpetuation of the predatory prison industry,
that is being a shelter for those who don't respect
the rights of others, - in addition to perpetuation of
the slavery and genocide against its own people...
Smirnoff
"_ G O D _" <DEM...@TELUS.NET> wrote in message
news:vTVAj.72108$FO1.9012@edtnps82
It is rather simple. The ones that preach everyone should own a gun and if
that were the case there would be an overall reduction in crime are fools. I
have seen posts by these bun loons trying to claim that a girl would not get
rapped if she had a gun and so forth. Like the girls that were murdered
recently it would have mode no difference what-so-ever if they were armed.
When does the girl or anyone for that matter decide to pullout a hand gun?
No one knows and if the rapist thought there was a chance she had a gun then
it would not stop this kind or any kind of crime. The criminal would just
take extra precaution from the start. If a gun nut with a gun wants to shoot
someone the idea that his victim might be armed would not prevent the crime.
Are people expected to wear their weapon for quick draw or carry it ready to
fire? The criminal mind is not something that can be dissuaded by the idea
of more guns in the hands of potential victims. Only the gun nuts have these
wild dreams that their gun will give them an advantage over the guy that
already has one pointed at them.
The issue of black is the same. Nothing will stop crime but education.
Smirnoff
"Jimbo" <mellow@home> wrote in message
news:47d4379f...@news.usenetmonster.com
To bad you actually believe what you post. You have no clue about what goes
on in China or anywhere else. I remember a man that refused to move from his
home that hit the press in the US. There was nothing left but a huge mound
of dirt surrounding his home. No one dragged him away and had him shot like
you would love to think. You are really one lame winger that is clear.
Smirnoff
"Jasper PNL, Ltd." <jasp...@noniggs.com> wrote in message
news:VxVAj.4174$e52.507@trndny01
It is obvious that I am dealing with very uneducated retards. Where else
would such a lowlife be brought up? Did mom and dad attend Harvard?
Jimbo
wrote:
> The issue of black is the same. Nothing will stop crime but education.
Das right, whigga. We niggas need collitch edumacayshuns to know that
it be wrong to butcher a person fo her ATM card.
Now, give me muh 20 extra affimative actshun points on the collitch
entrance exam so I can lurn these things.
Jimbo
wrote:
>"Jimbo" <mellow@home> wrote
>news:47d44391...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>>
>> "_ G O D _" wrote:
>>
>
>>>
>>>But isn't he a product of COmpletely
>>>COrrupt and criminal Judicial System...
>>
>> No, he's the product of moral bankruptcy from poor parenting
>> aided-and-abetted by excuse making shitbirds like yourself.
> "Ape"
A good description for someone who shows no humanity by butchering
another person for her ATM card.
What's your word for him, scumbag: "Victim"?
>COck-suck
You're mother wore me out.
Come back in an hour.
Jimbo
wrote:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2006-11-01-china-executions_x.htm
China was responsible for 81% of the world's known executions — 1,770
out of 2,184 — last year, according to Amnesty International. Amnesty
said the actual number of executions in China could be several times
higher. In the USA, 60 people were executed in 2005.
Human rights groups and Chinese legal scholars have criticized the
Chinese government for excessive use of the death penalty and for
carrying out some executions after sham trials. Sixty-eight offenses —
including non-violent crimes such as tax evasion, drug smuggling and
corruption — carry the death penalty.(snip)
Way Back Jack
wrote:
>It is obvious that I am dealing with very uneducated retards. Where else
>would such a lowlife be brought up? Did mom and dad attend Harvard?
Borderline Retarded 70-75 IQ - Seligman p.151
Black Delinquents 74 Shuey p. 498
Africans (Africa) 75 Lynn as cited by Murray p. 288
Southern Black children 80.5 Shuey
Black Felons 81 Shuey p. 498
Black Females 82 Interpolated from SAT estimate
Black Average 85 IQ Seligman p.149
Colored From Africa 85 Lynn as cited by Murray p.
Dull-Normal 80-90 IQ Textbook by Wechsler
Border Black Children 87 Shuey, and SAT Tables, 1991
Northern Black Children 87.6 Shuey, and SAT Tables, 1991
Black G12 NAEP Math 89 (7)
Black US Northern Average 90 IQ Jensen(4)
Urban North Black 91.1 Shuey
Hisp G12 NAEP Math 92 (7)
White Felons 92 Shey p. 498
White Chronic Welfare 92 Murray
Overall Criminals 92 Murray
Malays 96 Lynn 1977 (Seligman)
White American Girls 96 SAT Tables, 1991
White Unwed - No Welfare 98 Murray
Mixed Child of Black 100 Murray p. 310 (5)
Adopted Asian Children 100 Sandra Scarr
American Students 100 Cattell's culture Fair Test
British 100 Lynn 1977 (Seligman)
Average Intelligence 90-109 IQ Textbook by Wechsler
Mainland China 101 Lynn (Seligman)
White CLAS Reading & Math 100 A.Hu set by definition (6)
Asian Calif CLAS Math 102 A.Hu (7)
White G12 NAEP math 102 (7), and SAT Tables, 1991
British Children 102 IQ Lynn & Song 1994
Malnourished Korean Adult 102 Winick, Meyer and Harris 1975 (2)
Asian Average 103-4 Murray
Korean (est) 105 IQ Lynn & Song 1994
Chinese Hong Kong 106 IQ Chan & Lynn 1989
Chinese Hong Kong 106.7 Lynn 1982 (Seligman)
Japanese 9 Year Olds 107 IQ Shigehisa & Lynn 1991
Korean 108.5 IQ Lynn & song 1994
Asian G12 NAEP math 109 (7)
Korean Children in Korea 109 IQ Lynn & Song 1994
Chinese Hong Kong 109.8 Lynn 1982 (Seligman)
Bright-Normal 110-119 IQ Textbook Wechseler
Korean Adults in Belgium 110 Frydman & Lynn 1989
Chinese 110 Lynn 1977 (Seligman) Well
Nourished Korean Adult 112 Winick, Meyer and Harris 1975 (2)
North Dakota Public Schools 112 SAT Table, 1991, and NAEP
Jewish Boys 112.8 verbal Ann Arbor Institute
(Seligman)
Texas Non-public Schools 116 naepmath.pdf
Adopted White children 120 Sandra Scarr
Whites at UC Berkeley 124 A.Hu top 5% top 1/3 of UC
Superior 120-129 IQ Text Wechsleler
Above Superior 130 & above By Definition
White/Asian MIT 138 A.Hu (top0.5% of population)
Patrick Coghlan
> On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:59:22 -0400, Patrick Coghlan <ne...@coghlan.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> jaona...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>> On 8-Mar-2008, Patrick Coghlan <ne...@coghlan.ca> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The sad thing is, there will be thousands more killings like this as
>>>> long as handguns are legal in the US.
>>> Ban handguns and only niggers with have handguns
>>>
>>> arm every man and woman above the age of 18 teach them how to shoot, what a
>>> threat is and what it is not bring back self defense classes in public
>>> schools
>>>
>>> what has happened to the men in this country?
>> Why not just get RID of the handguns altogether, except for law enforcement?
>
> Why not get rid of drugs altogther?
>
> Same answer; it can't be done.
Sure it can. There are very few handguns in other western countries,
and very few handgun crimes there. Rarely do you see massacres at
college campuses, except for the one we had in Canada about 20 years ago
(shooter had a .223 rifle).
>
>> If they're not eliminated, this kind of story will continue to happen
>> for the next 100 years.
>
> No, it will happen as long as there is homo sapiens.
>
> And as this blue rock gets more and more crowded, it will increase.
For other reasons, perhaps, but we don't need to make it any easier via
a proliferation of handguns.
Smirnoff
"Jimbo" <mellow@home> wrote in message
news:47d450e2...@news.usenetmonster.com
It is of no surprise that you are clueless about education.
Way Back Jack
wrote:
>Way Back Jack wrote:
>> On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:59:22 -0400, Patrick Coghlan <ne...@coghlan.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> jaona...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>>> On 8-Mar-2008, Patrick Coghlan <ne...@coghlan.ca> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The sad thing is, there will be thousands more killings like this as
>>>>> long as handguns are legal in the US.
>>>> Ban handguns and only niggers with have handguns
>>>>
>>>> arm every man and woman above the age of 18 teach them how to shoot, what a
>>>> threat is and what it is not bring back self defense classes in public
>>>> schools
>>>>
>>>> what has happened to the men in this country?
>>> Why not just get RID of the handguns altogether, except for law enforcement?
>>
>> Why not get rid of drugs altogther?
>>
>> Same answer; it can't be done.
>
>Sure it can. There are very few handguns in other western countries,
>and very few handgun crimes there. Rarely do you see massacres at
>college campuses, except for the one we had in Canada about 20 years ago
>(shooter had a .223 rifle).
America's thugs *will* always get guns.
When your mud population reaches critical mass, about 10%, talk to me.
>>
>>> If they're not eliminated, this kind of story will continue to happen
>>> for the next 100 years.
>>
>> No, it will happen as long as there is homo sapiens.
>>
>> And as this blue rock gets more and more crowded, it will increase.
>
>For other reasons, perhaps, but we don't need to make it any easier via
>a proliferation of handguns.
Trying to stop handguns in a morally-bankrupt society will be as
successful as trying to change the direction of a hurricane.
Jimbo
wrote:
Actually, the extra points for being black were eliminated by SCOTUS
in Gratz v. Bollinger, but racial preferences are still alive-and-well
per their decision in Grutter v. Bollinger. (Bothe decided in 6/2003)
Smirnoff
"Jimbo" <mellow@home> wrote in message
news:47d452ad...@news.usenetmonster.com
> executions - 1,770 out of 2,184 - last year, according to
> Amnesty International. Amnesty said the actual number of
> executions in China could be several times higher. In the
> USA, 60 people were executed in 2005.
>
> Human rights groups and Chinese legal scholars have
> criticized the Chinese government for excessive use of
> the death penalty and for carrying out some executions
> after sham trials. Sixty-eight offenses - including
> non-violent crimes such as tax evasion, drug smuggling
> and corruption - carry the death penalty.(snip)
Drug smuggling and some corruption should be punishable by death. These are
probably some of the few crimes where execution might actually be a
deterrence. I would include waging war on a nation that posed no threat or
invasion like the Bush war of crime and murder of tens of thousands of non
combatants, women and children. Human rights violations should be counted on
people of other nations as well. If you count the deaths that Bush has
caused then China looks like Disneyland.
_ G O D _
"Jimbo" <mellow@home> wrote
news:47d45141...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>
>
> You're mother wore me out.
Please leave my mother alone, - you twisted
sadistic COck-sucking americunt. But you can
still continue your COck-sucking business with
those who value your services...
Jimbo
wrote:
Bush is too soft on Muslims.
Islam's prime directive is to convert, enlsve, or kill all infidels.
They must be extinguished.
THE PROBLEM IS ISLAM... SAYING OTHERWISE DOES NOT NEGATE THAT FACT.
SENSE OF UMMAH
The Trouble With Islam
Sadly, mainstream Muslim teaching accepts and promotes violence.
BY TAWFIK HAMID
Tuesday, April 3, 2007 12:01 a.m. EDT
Not many years ago the brilliant Orientalist, Bernard Lewis, published
a short history of the Islamic world's decline, entitled "What Went
Wrong?" Astonishingly, there was, among many Western "progressives," a
vocal dislike for the title. It is a false premise, these critics
protested. They ignored Mr. Lewis's implicit statement that things
have been, or could be, right.
But indeed, there is much that is clearly wrong with the Islamic
world. Women are stoned to death and undergo clitorectomies. Gays hang
from the gallows under the approving eyes of the proponents of
Shariah, the legal code of Islam. Sunni and Shia massacre each other
daily in Iraq. Palestinian mothers teach 3-year-old boys and girls the
ideal of martyrdom. One would expect the orthodox Islamic
establishment to evade or dismiss these complaints, but less happily,
the non-Muslim priests of enlightenment in the West have come,
actively and passively, to the Islamists' defense.
These "progressives" frequently cite the need to examine "root
causes." In this they are correct: Terrorism is only the manifestation
of a disease and not the disease itself. But the root-causes are quite
different from what they think. As a former member of Jemaah Islamiya,
a group led by al Qaeda's second in command, Ayman al-Zawahiri, I know
firsthand that the inhumane teaching in Islamist ideology can
transform a young, benevolent mind into that of a terrorist. Without
confronting the ideological roots of radical Islam it will be
impossible to combat it. While there are many ideological "rootlets"
of Islamism, the main tap root has a name--Salafism, or Salafi Islam,
a violent, ultra-conservative version of the religion.
It is vital to grasp that traditional and even mainstream Islamic
teaching accepts and promotes violence. Shariah, for example, allows
apostates to be killed, permits beating women to discipline them,
seeks to subjugate non-Muslims to Islam as dhimmis and justifies
declaring war to do so. It exhorts good Muslims to exterminate the
Jews before the "end of days." The near deafening silence of the
Muslim majority against these barbaric practices is evidence enough
that there is something fundamentally wrong.
The grave predicament we face in the Islamic world is the virtual lack
of approved, theologically rigorous interpretations of Islam that
clearly challenge the abusive aspects of Shariah. Unlike Salafism,
more liberal branches of Islam, such as Sufism, typically do not
provide the essential theological base to nullify the cruel
proclamations of their Salafist counterparts. And so, for more than 20
years I have been developing and working to establish a
theologically-rigorous Islam that teaches peace.
Yet it is ironic and discouraging that many non-Muslim, Western
intellectuals--who unceasingly claim to support human rights--have
become obstacles to reforming Islam. Political correctness among
Westerners obstructs unambiguous criticism of Shariah's inhumanity.
They find socioeconomic or political excuses for Islamist terrorism
such as poverty, colonialism, discrimination or the existence of
Israel. What incentive is there for Muslims to demand reform when
Western "progressives" pave the way for Islamist barbarity? Indeed, if
the problem is not one of religious beliefs, it leaves one to wonder
why Christians who live among Muslims under identical circumstances
refrain from contributing to wide-scale, systematic campaigns of
terror.
Politicians and scholars in the West have taken up the chant that
Islamic extremism is caused by the Arab-Israeli conflict. This
analysis cannot convince any rational person that the Islamist murder
of over 150,000 innocent people in Algeria--which happened in the last
few decades--or their slaying of hundreds of Buddhists in Thailand, or
the brutal violence between Sunni and Shia in Iraq could have anything
to do with the Arab-Israeli conflict.
Western feminists duly fight in their home countries for equal pay and
opportunity, but seemingly ignore, under a façade of cultural
relativism, that large numbers of women in the Islamic world live
under threat of beating, execution and genital mutilation, or cannot
vote, drive cars and dress as they please.
The tendency of many Westerners to restrict themselves to
self-criticism further obstructs reformation in Islam. Americans
demonstrate against the war in Iraq, yet decline to demonstrate
against the terrorists who kidnap innocent people and behead them.
Similarly, after the Madrid train bombings, millions of Spanish
citizens demonstrated against their separatist organization, ETA. But
once the demonstrators realized that Muslims were behind the terror
attacks they suspended the demonstrations. This example sent a message
to radical Islamists to continue their violent methods.
Western appeasement of their Muslim communities has exacerbated the
problem. During the four-month period after the publication of the
Muhammad cartoons in a Danish magazine, there were comparatively few
violent demonstrations by Muslims. Within a few days of the Danish
magazine's formal apology, riots erupted throughout the world. The
apology had been perceived by Islamists as weakness and concession.
Worst of all, perhaps, is the anti-Americanism among many Westerners.
It is a resentment so strong, so deep-seated, so rooted in personal
identity, that it has led many, consciously or unconsciously, to
morally support America's enemies.
Progressives need to realize that radical Islam is based on an
antiliberal system. They need to awaken to the inhumane policies and
practices of Islamists around the world. They need to realize that
Islamism spells the death of liberal values. And they must not take
for granted the respect for human rights and dignity that we
experience in America, and indeed, the West, today.
Well-meaning interfaith dialogues with Muslims have largely been
fruitless. Participants must demand--but so far haven't--that Muslim
organizations and scholars specifically and unambiguously denounce
violent Salafi components in their mosques and in the media. Muslims
who do not vocally oppose brutal Shariah decrees should not be
considered "moderates."
All of this makes the efforts of Muslim reformers more difficult. When
Westerners make politically-correct excuses for Islamism, it actually
endangers the lives of reformers and in many cases has the effect of
suppressing their voices.
Tolerance does not mean toleration of atrocities under the umbrella of
relativism. It is time for all of us in the free world to face the
reality of Salafi Islam or the reality of radical Islam will continue
to face us.
Jimbo
wrote:
>
>
>"Jimbo" <mellow@home> wrote
>news:47d45141...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>>
>>
>> You're mother wore me out.
>
>Please leave my mother alone, -
Tell HER to leave ME alone.
> COck-suck?
I'm drained.
Come back later
_ G O D _
news:47d45f1e...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>
> "_ G O D _" wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Jimbo" <mellow@home> wrote
>>news:47d45141...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>>>
>>>
>>> You're mother wore me out.
>>
>>Please leave my mother alone, -
>
> Tell HER to leave ME alone.
You are the one displaying your necrophilia here...
jerry warner
Way Back Jack wrote:
> Eve Carson who was student body president at Univ. North Carolina was
> a brilliant pre-med student. Cops have a picture of the ape as he was
> using her ATM card but haven't yet apprehended him.
>
> I met Eve's parents through some relatives of my wife. Really nice
> people and now they have to deal with this the rest of their days.
>
> _________
> http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/stories/2008/03/08/unc_0309_web2.html
>
> Carson remembered as "one of a kind"
>
> (SNIP)
Yes, why her of all people!
But the apes out number the rest of us.
Its trully tragic.
Take care. Pray.
Jerry
jaona...@nowhere.com
you defend them
what happened to the men in this country
I would bet you wear a shirt on the weekends
On 9-Mar-2008, "Smirnoff" <Unl...@unlisted.com> wrote:
> What about the ones under 18? Do you plan on providing an armed bodyguard
jaona...@nowhere.com
On 9-Mar-2008, jaona...@nowhere.com wrote:
> I would bet you wear a shirt on the weekends
should say skirt
sorry queer bait
Smirnoff
<jaona...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:47d4c1cb$0$25217$ec3e...@news.usenetmonster.com
> no you nut less cowering wonder
> you defend them
>
> what happened to the men in this country
>
> I would bet you wear a shirt on the weekends
>
>
I do wear a shirt. I have one on right now as a matter of fact. What does
my shirt have to do with anything you babbling loon? What ever you are on I
suggest you give it up.
Smirnoff
<jaona...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:47d4c371$0$25207$ec3e...@news.usenetmonster.com
Wahahahaha................What a stupid buffoon you
are.......wahahahaha.............
Mr Wonderful
"Smirnoff" <Unl...@unlisted.com> wrote in message
news:w76Bj.1699$lU5...@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net...
Mr Wonderful
instructor for the Dicksucking 101 class at the WTB Training Academy.news:I66Bj.1698$lU5...@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net...
Jimbo
wrote:
>"Jimbo" <mellow@home> wrote
>news:47d45f1e...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>>
>> "_ G O D _" wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Jimbo" <mellow@home> wrote
>>>news:47d45141...@news.usenetmonster.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You're mother wore me out.
>>>
>>>Please leave my mother alone, -
>>
>> Tell HER to leave ME alone.
>
>You are the one displaying your necrophilia here...
*You're* the one pimping her shriveled cunt.
++LEROY KNEVIL!!!!!!!!!!!
pickers. or naacp
--
*ATTENTION*
*ALL NIGGERS MUST FOLLOW THESE GUIDELINES TO POST IN AFN*:
(1) the niggers SOP is to change the post so it says something
different. Also use nigger meaningless code words like "wtb"
(2) the nigger may alter or edit posts it is replying to, so as
to enable itself to retort more effectively.
(3) Niggers will also change the subject, leave the thread, or
willfully misunderstand and forge the white humans who are
humiliating them.
(4) Change the spelling to sound more like the nigger that they
are.(like azz for ass)
(5) Niggers will deal with this by claiming that they have won".
(6) pretending to be a whiteslave at work and replying "sir"
to another nigger.
(7) Pretend to have retired rich and own many vehicles and
motorcycles.
(8) It will try to put a human touch on the nigger parasite
(9) It will claim to have a superior black somewhere???
(10)they will refer to themselves as a "black man" instead of
what they really are (niggers)
(11)niggers will try to improve the nigger image by saying
it served in the military with honors or was awarded some
hero medal from the naacp
(12) As a first and last retort, there's always the infamous
"MUH DICK" post.
IT ALL ADDS UP TO "TNB"
Bo Raxo
<//O...@TRUE.0RG> wrote in message
news:f1o8t355jdv1jso6c...@4ax.com...
> Guns don't murder Humans, niggers do.
>
So who killed Lauren Burk? Oh, you racist Neanderthals only notice the
killings that fir your pet theories.
Bo Raxo
<//O...@TRUE.0RG> wrote in message
news:oie7t3do05ghno2fv...@4ax.com...
> >Eve Carson who was student body president at Univ. North Carolina was
>>a brilliant pre-med student. Cops have a picture of the ape as he was
>>using her ATM card but haven't yet apprehended him.
>>
>>I met Eve's parents through some relatives of my wife. Really nice
>>people and now they have to deal with this the rest of their days.
>>
>>_________
>>http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/stories/2008/03/08/unc_0309_web2.html
>>
>>Carson remembered as "one of a kind"
>>
> leader who was found shot to death early Wednesday on a neighborhood
> road was murdered by a typical nigger savage. "We have evidence that
> it was Typical Nigger Behavior, but we're still in the first 24 or 36
> hours of this investigation," he said. "As far as we know, she
> wouldn't have anything to do with fecal colored critters."
>
COLUMBUS, Ga. - The mother of the man charged with killing an Auburn
University student said her son was an Iraq war veteran who was changed
after his service, and offered an apology to the freshman's family.
Catherine Williams, the mother of suspect Courtney Lockhart, made the
apology to Lauren Burk's family in an interview with Columbus, Georgia,
television station WTVM.
"You have to understand, we're typical country white trash. We teach our
kids to love guns from an early age, and tht the solution to any problem is
either a gun or a bottle of booze. But don't get me wrong, I'm not going to
admit that our culture of gun lust and easy access to firearms is to blame -
nope, I'm going to blame the Army. They sent my boy to Iraq where he got
used to killing people, when he got home, what do you expect?"
tiny dancer
"Bo Raxo" <crimene...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:VLOdnYOjufuk6Uja...@comcast.com...
Courtney Lockhart was black, not 'typical country white trash'.
He was also dishonorably discharged from the military for punching out a
commanding officer.
td
>
>
>
Jimbo
The murderer of the Auburn coed is a jigaboo, you lying splib.
Here's his mug shot:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/03/08/auburn.student/index.html
Jimbo
No asshole, he's a jigaboo too
http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/03/08/auburn.student/index.html
Check out the photo
jaona...@nowhere.com
you two should stick to moon batting and down low clubs
Frogbutt
news:7Y8Bj.9241$tW....@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com:
> You are responding to a white trash bitch and dicksucker. She is head
> instructor for the Dicksucking 101 class at the WTB Training Academy.
Frogbutt
@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com:
> Not only is she a buffoon, she is a white trash bitch and a dicksucker.
jaona...@nowhere.com
On 9-Mar-2008, Patrick Coghlan <ne...@coghlan.ca> wrote:
> Why not just get RID of the handguns altogether, except for law
> enforcement?
>
> If they're not eliminated, this kind of story will continue to happen
> for the next 100 years.
here lays the problem and it is the problem in Germany the UK France and
Canada (especially Toronto) Banning handguns in the UK never stopped the IRA
or street thugs in London it didn't stop 911 or train bombings in Spain. It
has not stopped Arab violence in France or shootings in Morocco. It would
not have stopped Kip Cinkle or the I hate Mondays girl. Most handguns are
produces off shore i.e., Glock Berretta Walthrap and banning them will not
stop the smuggling. Take a look at the history of Marijuana as soon as it
was banned in the U.S. (tax act 1937) the smuggling began.
Do you really think banning handguns will stop Russia from producing them
and allowing them to be shipped here
we are the only ones that can stop what is happening to our country and like
I always say our men will have to become men again (I don't see this
happening)
Smirnoff
<jaona...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:47d644af$0$14543$ec3e...@news.usenetmonster.com
Don't bad guns. Ban gun nuts. The rest will take care of itself.
Jimbo
wrote:
Gun nuts = criminals.
Hey, we agree.
Smirnoff
"Jimbo" <mellow@home> wrote in message
news:47d70616...@news.usenetmonster.com
Gun nuts have a sickness. A weakness and ignorance that blind them. A fear
and paranoia of everything and everyone. They feel if they have their gun
near it will make them strong. Clearly they are defective.
_ G O D _
"Smirnoff" <Unl...@unlisted.com> wrote
news:BACBj.1726$lU5....@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net...
>
>
> <jaona...@nowhere.com> wrote
> news:47d644af$0$14543$ec3e...@news.usenetmonster.com
>> Patrick Coghlan <ne...@coghlan.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> Why not just get RID of the handguns
>>> altogether, except for law enforcement?
>>>
>>> If they're not eliminated, this kind of story will
>>> continue to happen for the next 100 years.
>>
>> banning them will not stop the smuggling. Take a look at the history of
>> Marijuana...
>
> Don't bad guns. Ban gun nuts. The rest will take care of itself.
But if neither of them is impossible to ban,
why not just arm everybody, except retards,
who aren't capable of protecting their guns,
while shooting others for imbecilic reasons.
Then all the problems will solve themselves...
_ G O D _
news:c1FBj.1730$lU5...@newsread1.mlpsca01.us.to.verio.net...
>
>
>
> They feel if they have their gun near it will make them strong. Clearly they are
> defective.
Don't you see that you are contradicting yourself here?
Because anything that's increasing their confidence in
their own strength, has a positive effect on the people...
Way Back Jack
wrote:
Is that why the nigger gunned-down Eve Carson? A sickness? Yeah,
it's called Moral Bankruptcy.
And imagine if the races had been reversed, weenie. The big media
would be screaming "HATE CRIME."
jaona...@nowhere.com
On 11-Mar-2008, "Smirnoff" <Unl...@unlisted.com> wrote:
> Don't bad guns. Ban gun nuts. The rest will take care of itself.
tell it to Eve Carson
dumb ass
Smirnoff
<jaona...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:47d7486e$0$14540$ec3e...@news.usenetmonster.com
You are the dumb ass if you think she could have prevented it if she had a
gun you loon. Man you gun nuts sure are a stupid lot.
Smirnoff
"Way Back Jack" <Liberal'sWorstN...@orgy.org> wrote in
message news:47d72c79...@news.motzarella.org
The gunman was not a gun nut. You are the gun nut. Most everyone that posts
to this group are gun nuts. The ones that think that a girl that was raped
could have single handily prevented it if she had a gun. The ones that think
a gun in every 18 year olds hand means a safer school playground and on and
on. The gunman is a simple criminal. One of many that will always be around.
If he had no gun he would most likely have used a knife. There was no "HATE"
crime you. He saw her as a victim and took what he wanted. A beautiful white
girl. It happens all the time.
Way Back Jack
wrote:
The murderer is not a gun nut.
A person who believes in defending himself with a gun is anut.
Typical moonbat liberal sentiment.
Put it this way, twinkue. If would've had a gun, her chances would
have been better than they were.
>There was no "HATE"
>crime you.
Yeah, that's the typical liberal mantra, sonny. Another brainwashed
idiot.
In the United States, when it comes to race relations, much is said
about "White racism", which perpetuates the media-driven illusion of
Euro-Americans as a violent and threatening community to non-Whites.
However, this is a deceiving and prejudiced picture. A simple glance
at statistical data compiled on interracial crime shows that White
Americans are often targeted by non-Whites, while in contrast, they
seldom commit so-called "hate crimes."
Based on a victimization survey of the US Bureau of Justice, it is
possible to make a fairly accurate estimate of the magnitude of
interracial crime by converting into numbers the percentages given on
two statistical tables:
*Table 42- Distribution of single-offender victimizations, based
on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender.
*Table 48- Distribution of multiple-offender victimizations, by
type of crime, race of victims and perceived race of offender.
We can also use some figures from the FBI UCR Crime reports. Such data
shows that in 2002, while there were, about 1,700 White-on-Black "hate
crimes", there were nearly 2 million Black-on-White crimes. Yet, while
the statistics for "hate crimes" receive extensive media coverage, the
statistics for interracial crimes are rarely mentioned. This is what
leads to a mistaken and stereotyped image of Euro-Americans and the
way they are perceived to relate to people of other races.
If one looks at interracial crime as a whole, Black-on-White crime
largely outnumbers White-on-Black crime. Oddly, while "White racism"
is often used to justify Black people's resentment and aggressiveness
toward Whites, White people are conditioned to believed that they are
not supposed to feel the slightest resentment for the ceaseless racial
violence of which they are the target.
While the Black community is presented by the media establishment as a
perpetually victimized group, facts & numbers show that the day of Jim
Crow's America are long gone. It is now Blacks who commit the most
crimes toward other racial groups in America, while European-Americans
are the most frequently targeted for interracial violence. Blacks are
safer today when they are amongst Whites than they are when they are
among their own community. The reverse isn't true for Whites.
Full Article With Statistical Charts
http://www.racismeantiblanc.bizland.com/005/06-02.htm
Way Back Jack
wrote:
Her chances would have been better.
Maybe we should have fought WWII without guns, eh.
______
In its last complete National Criminal Victimization Survey , the
Justice Department revealed blacks to have committed 1,600,951 violent
crimes against whites. Only 15 percent of these had robbery as a
motive. We can safely infer that most of the rest had race as at least
a partial motive. Eighty-five percent of the attacks were assaults and
rapes. While blacks were committing these 1.6 million crimes against
whites, whites were reciprocating with 165,345 violent offenses
against blacks. Blacks, representing thirteen percent of the nation,
committed more than 90 percent of the violent interracial crime.
Fifty-seven percent of the violent crime committed by blacks had white
victims. Less than 3 percent of violence committed by whites had black
victims. A black was 64 times more likely to attack a white than vice
versa. This is the real story of hate in America. It is the media's
well-kept secret.
____
Jasper PNL, Ltd.
>
>
> <jaona...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:47d7486e$0$14540$ec3e...@news.usenetmonster.com
> > On 11-Mar-2008, "Smirnoff" <Unl...@unlisted.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Don't bad guns. Ban gun nuts. The rest will take care of
> >> itself.
> >
> > tell it to Eve Carson
> >
> > dumb ass
>
> You are the dumb ass if you think she could have prevented it if she had
a
> gun you loon.
prove she couldn't have prevented it, whigger
>Man you gun nuts sure are a stupid lot.
>
just keep repeating that mantra, right after the second verse of Kumbaya
Smirnoff
"Way Back Jack" <here@home> wrote in message
news:47d7ca6...@news.newsguy.com
What?...................You HAVE to be one of the lamest gun nut jobs ever
posting to usenet. What does World War II have to do with a street crime you
raving moron? 30% of gun loons that have been shot have had it done with
their own gun you stupid retard.
Don't bad guns. Ban gun loons like you.