Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Tough on crime means losing drug war, critics say
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
_ G O D _  
View profile  
 More options Apr 13 2005, 2:17 pm
Newsgroups: alt.prisons, alt.law-enforcement, alt.politics.bush, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.republican, talk.politics.guns, talk.politics.drugs, soc.culture.israel, soc.culture.french
From: "_ G O D _" <D-E-M-I-G-...@SHAW.CA>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 18:17:08 GMT
Local: Wed, Apr 13 2005 2:17 pm
Subject: Tough on crime means losing drug war, critics say
Blank

Tough on crime means losing drug war, critics say

By Liesel Nowak

http://www.dailyprogress.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=CDP%2FMGArtic...

Critics have said that the traditionally harsh penalties in federal court have led to
jury nullification, in which jurors rule with their conscience instead of the law,
and that the tough-on-crime spirit of the federal system is losing the war on drugs.
Take the recent case of a Charlottesville man. Jurors in a 2004 federal trial
acquitted city resident Todd Jones, charged in a violent drug conspiracy, though they
convicted two others in the same case. At least one juror believed Jones was guilty.
Under recently abolished mandatory federal sentencing guidelines, a conviction would
have sent Todd Jones to prison for life.

The Jones juror, who asked not to be identified, said there was no evidence that
Jones had any knowledge of guns or the large amounts of drugs moved by the major
players of the conspiracy. “The rest of us thought that what he did did not rise to
the level of what the others did,” the juror said.

Jones sat alongside Gregory Antonio Bates Felton and Tadashi Demetrius Keyes in the
two-week trial while jurors heard testimony about violent ways Felton and Keyes
protected their narcotics business, dubbed “Estes Street Inc.” by prosecutors because
of the neighborhood in which they operated.

Because of his previous criminal record, if Jones, 36, had been convicted, federal
sentencing guidelines would have required that a judge sentence him to life in
prison. But it was clear Jones was not a major player in a violent drug ring, the
juror said.

“He was a user, that was obvious. He was … what sounded to me, an alcoholic. He was
not a complete innocent,” the juror said.
Caught up in the system
In January, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Booker that the
sentencing guidelines, which would have required Todd Jones spend the rest of his
life behind bars, are just that: guidelines. The decision gives judges discretion in
sentencing for the first time in nearly 20 years.

Because drugs often cross interstate boundaries, drug conspiracy cases that involve
many participants are regularly tried in federal court. Indeed, drug cases are the
most common type tried in the system. According to case statistics for 2003, 46
percent of all defendants in the Western District of Virginia, which includes the
Charlottesville area, were charged with drug crimes.

Charlottesville Commonwealth’s Attorney Dave Chapman said lower-level drug dealers
can sometimes be caught up in federal prosecutions as the government seeks to bring
down the leaders of violent drug enterprises. Such prosecutions must be done
responsibly, he said.

“You don’t want ever to take lightly the plight or status of the lesser player in the
enterprise and take people to federal court without having the appropriate regard for
the consequences,” Chapman said.

Though federal penalties for drug crimes are often harsh, the community has benefited
from such prosecutions, Chapman said, and some homicides in the city would never have
been solved had it not been for the power of a federal drug conspiracy prosecution.

Sometimes the only witnesses to a murder are members of the drug ring itself, and
many reveal what they know only after they are faced with the bitter reality of a
federal drug charge.
In the Estes Street case, a string of neighborhood shootings was solved, as was the
murder of Gerald Michie.
Capone and Co.
Greg Felton, known as “Capone” on the street, shot Michie in the head after accusing
him of stealing his guns. Keyes, described as his second lieutenant, shot a rival in
the arm. For most of their trial, prosecutors called on witnesses who connected
Felton and Keyes to guns and drugs used to further the violent conspiracy. Only a
handful of the 30 or so witnesses mentioned Jones, and most said he was an alcoholic
and a user.

Alonzo Trice, the group’s ringleader, was one of the government’s critical witnesses.
In addition to pointing to Felton as the triggerman in Michie’s slaying, Trice
testified that Jones acted as a liaison between him and other lower-level dealers.

Marlon Daniel, who brought cocaine to Trice from New York, was also a key witness for
the prosecution.

For their cooperation, prosecutors filed a motion for substantial assistance - known
in legal circles and among the prison population as a “5k” motion - for Trice and
Daniel that allowed these top conspirators to receive relatively light sentences of
15 years in prison.

Though investigators captured Jones on video surveillance hanging out with Felton,
Keyes and other members of “Estes Street Inc.,” and what appeared to be him
delivering a package near Trice’s house, jurors did not find him a relevant
participant.

On the stand, Jones said he had hung out on Estes Street and that police eventually
tapped him to be an informant. Jones, however, turned out to be of little help to
police. He spent money police gave him to buy alcohol, according to his testimony.

After he angered police, Jones said, his name was added to the conspiracy.

The juror said it appeared as if law enforcement sought retribution against Jones for
his ineffectiveness as a witness.

“All he did was get busted for using,” the Jones juror said. “I don’t know his whole
criminal record, but I don’t think he deserves life.”
A winnable war?
Since the inception of mandatory guidelines in 1987, drugs have continued to move
through society even as an increasing number of men and women are locked up.

“If you want to use the war on drugs analogy, then let’s use it. We’re losing,”
lawyer J. Lloyd Snook III said. “If the definition of insanity is doing something
over and over and hoping for a different result, then this is insane.”

According to the National Office of Drug Control Policy, in 2003 the federal
government spent $19 billion on the war on drugs - a rate of about $600 per second.
And the Bureau of Prisons reports that 89 percent of federal prisoners were convicted
of drug crimes.

The Jefferson Area Drug Enforcement task force, a collaborative effort of local and
federal law enforcement, continues to report high numbers of drug seizures. This
year, JADE officials recorded their second-largest cocaine seizure in a decade with
2,635 grams.

The agency announced in its 2004 annual report the disruption of three Jamaican-led
drug-distribution groups and another criminal group with leadership in New York.

Since its inception in 1995, JADE has arrested 1,906 people.

“The more they send away, there are those who will take their places,” local defense
lawyer Fred Heblich said. “The harsh penalties have not resulted in a decline in drug
trafficking. My impression is that there is more drug trafficking here than 15 years
ago. Certainly not less.”

Contact Liesel Nowak at (434) 978-7274 or lno...@dailyprogress.com.

--
_____________________________________________________

I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers
and other beneficiaries of the institutionalized slavery and genocide.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------

"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvees, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts
sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
reminds them of their responsibility."   ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
___________________________________________________
--


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »