Anomalies, Questions and Confusion Reign
Meldon Fens
consideration to visit sites recommended to me. Some things still don't make
sense and I would like proponents of these sites to offer their view as to
what I consider anomalies.
First, upon reading the home page of http://thebirdman.org/ I was impressed
by the quality of the author's writing ability. Many of the points he
touches on I have arrived at by virtue of what I would consider independent
investigation. I hope to delve deeper into the site of this unusual
character. Nothing so far seems obviously questionable.
Second, was http://www.radicalpress.com/. The contributors to the first page
of this site are a varied group and while the information confirms much of
what I suspected to be a possible truth, there seems to be some anomalies.
For example, and article by Ezra Levant in which he is critical of the CHRC.
When I first heard of Levant's case, my reaction was, "hypocrisy!". This is
based on my perception that the commission has goals similar to that of the
Anti Defamation League. Levant seems to moan about being dragged before the
commission for publishing the infamous cartoons so inflammatory to muslims,
so naturally I would think how hypocritical it is for him to complain since
a parallel publishing of cartoons depicting Israel or jews in a negative
light would surely cause an investigation to be launched and the Lemire case
would suggest this is true. This is the first anomaly, i.e.., why suddenly
is Ezra Levant speaking out against the commission if not for the simple
reason that he himself has come under their scrutiny in an ironical
reversal? Why too would Radical Press publish Levant when it seems clear he
is only complaining now that he was dragged before them? In an earlier
article Topham, points to the ironic twist I mention. Is Levant responding
to Topham's article? In yet another previous article, another Levant article
is published. Is this the reason for Topham's article? Still more posts from
Topham and Levant are encountered and at least one appears to be Topham
quoting Levant. (No anomaly, I'm just confused and that's not unusual. I
should mention the posts are reverse chronological order and I'm reading top
down.)
At the same site and page, another author (Red-X) speaks of an alleged
publication entitled, "Advanced Strategies on Stealing Indigenous Resources"
and expresses his or her contempt for colonialism and those who represent
it. While I in no way defend the actions of those who I may represent, I
would consider myself a representative of colonialism since I am a white
anglo and the author's view puts me at unease. Why would Radical Press seek
to encourage hatred of white anglos? This is anomaly number two.
What follows is yet another rage filled diatribe against white America by
the author Layla Anwar. The author states in no uncertain terms, "I really
can't stand Americans. I can't stand their men, their women, their country,
everything they represent.P.S: Brits may apply too. But you may get the
leftovers.After all you have become a leftover yourselves." This sentiment
is also troubling to me. It seems to incite hate against white anglo
Americans (and British) and certainly gives me reason for concern. This is
another article which I question the Radical Press' rational. It is anomaly
number three.
There are earlier posts regarding the zionist threat and as I have argued
previously suspect that zionism is a whipping boy meant to take the heat for
jews behaving badly. My biggest question regarding the validity of criticism
aimed at zionism is why are there *not more* moderate jews critical or aware
of this apparent zealous political force? What is the need for Zionism if
Israel has already achieved statehood? Why is Zion mentioned so few times in
Ford's International Jew and in Hitler's Mien Kampf while jews are the clear
object of criticism in both of those publications? This I would argue is
anomaly number four.
At http://zionofascism.wordpress.com/, there is significant mention of the
Harper government and its alleged ties to Zionofascists. While there is much
mention of its dangers and mention of characters I have already associated
as dangerous, I am not convinced the Harper government is in league with
these forces. I am admittedly politically ignorant to a great extent, after
all the average person is not privy to inner workings of political power,
but I had hoped that the Harper government would be representative of a
return to a sense of sanity as compared to the Liberal government. It does
not seem convincing to me that the Conservatives have suddenly since their
election to power placed in positions of authority interests counter to my
own namely radical, self-serving jews. If anything, it stands to reason this
is a pro-liberal position aiming to direct anger at jews toward the
Conservative government. This I would have to suggest is anomaly number
five.
Another telling image at this site is the flag consisting of four nations in
the form of a swastika. To me this is indicative of an attempt to direct the
combined hate and frustration of everyone toward every representation of
current power. When I see images or criticism generalized at things
traditionally considered white and anglo, I become rather unnerved and
suspicious. As a white anglo I am sensitive toward people's anger toward
anything white and anglo. When I see examples of this I see jews and perhaps
muslims stirring hate toward white anglo. This would be anomaly number six.
The final site I find interesting. The information is in depth, contains
jews critical of jews and numerous articles exposing a little known reality
(at least for me). The biggest problem I have with the site is that the
finger points to Zionists. As I have eluded to in the past, I am suspicious
of zionist criticism since it appears to steer responsibility away from
jews. I should point out that I have stated in the past I do not believe all
jews are part of a plan to dominate the world and at times I go both ways on
this subject. There is simply no way to distinguish what is truth and what
is deception when it comes to this level of political intrigue. I believe
those who are critical of zionism and only partially critical of jews in
general owe a substantive explanation for this and the other anomalies I
have mentioned. Things still don't appear to add up in a cogent manner.
There are unanswered questions remaining and I still maintain a danger is
present in the form of apparent sympathizers who may simply be sophisticated
operatives.
I have included the links for your review and ask that you refrain from
reaching conclusions too quickly.
Shalom, Salem Alekou (sic.)
--
There is still time to prevent another jewish holocaust.
Help Meldon fight the WAR.