On Apr 6, 11:32 pm, Mr. B1ack <
nowh...@nada.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 14:14:30 -0700 (PDT), "His Highness the Wise
> TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher" <
comandante.ban...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >What a silly question, right? We must have a monkey in our
> >evolutionary tree, for sure. We left the jungle behind, became bipedal
> >and lost a use for it. We have it, but it's called "vestigial,"
> >meaning have lost its purpose.
>
> >Then God is a collective figment of the imagination, something found
> >in the Twilight Zone but without the imagination.
>
> >
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxf_Dvy0VLs
>
> >I love those shows and I will enjoy one right now. Just didn't know
> >they were free and available on YouTube. Why religion has lost that
> >sense of mystery and just sounds like a repetitive humbug?
>
> >I think primitive men --including the American Indians-- still had the
> >power of mystery and enchantment. Or perhaps it was Bob Marley that
> >gave it a voice we recognize and enjoy. Or is it the sound of the
> >didgeridoo?
>
> >The fact is that we have a tail.
>
> >--------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >
http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>
> Hmmm ... I wonder how many babies are born with
> a visible tail - which is then, quietly, snipped
> off ?
>
> Anyhow, to actually be USEFUL, humans would need a
> tail about four feet long and nearly as big 'round
> as an arm. Then you could lift things with it,
> manipulate them, brace your weight on the tail,
> even hang from it for awhile. Alas, it WOULD
> complicate the design of chairs and clothing ...
>
> True apes do not have much of a tail. This
> probably was not the result of an 'evolutionary
> process' per-se but some random mutation. None
> of our direct line, even australopithicines,
> had even a vestigal tail, so it's not like it
> lost utility and gradually shrank away over
> millenia.
>
> It occurs to me that with modern tech, it ought to
> be possible to make a mechanical 'tail' people could
> learn to control with decent precision - especially
> once direct electrical-2-nerve connections are
> properly refined. Later on, tails could probably
> be added genetically, replacing the 'faulty' gene
> our lineage misplaced. So, if we really WANT tails
> they ARE in reach, so to speak.
And we could wag the tail in pleasure, say, when meeting a girl. I
love all those things dogs say with their tail.
Apes must have lost it because the tail had no function. "Form follows
function." Even if we had a tail, we are just too heavy to hang from
trees. It would be, as you say, just nice to have. One thing though,
we still have a tail in the embryo stage.