Received: by 10.205.122.65 with SMTP id gf1mr3002752bkc.2.1337695495305;
        Tue, 22 May 2012 07:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
Path: e27ni39763bkw.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!h41g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: pnyikos <nyik...@bellsouth.net>
Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.politics.economics,alt.politics,misc.legal,alt.abortion
Subject: Re: Why Do Liberal Dems Keep Flattering A Revisionist Like Scalia By
 Calling Him An "Originalist?"
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 06:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 96
Message-ID: <840fcf74-2d7b-4fbe-aab4-0fed0f907f85@h41g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
References: <75f8c061-82de-457e-9675-f34a96984e9b@2g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>
 <b2e33ba3-f5c4-44d5-82da-1780ac890311@2g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>
 <jgkeegan-F1F5F2.16180603052012@news.individual.net> <a979edcd-b250-4343-862e-133cd6d194fd@a5g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
 <jgkeegan-E09481.15510910052012@news.individual.net> <72da8439-b9f7-4548-92ba-8d64e773f849@35g2000yqq.googlegroups.com>
 <c9257494-20e4-418b-a91f-a68c4b429d9a@pr7g2000pbb.googlegroups.com> <jgkeegan-A365C7.13322815052012@news.individual.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.252.12.169
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1337695417 23546 127.0.0.1 (22 May 2012 14:03:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 14:03:37 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: nyik...@bellsouth.net
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: h41g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=129.252.12.169; posting-account=Tg50IwoAAAD3jBqLtc0cbN1iE1x1onY3
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120224 Firefox/10.0.1,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On May 15, 1:32=A0am, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In article
> <c9257494-20e4-418b-a91f-a68c4b429...@pr7g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
> =A0Gary Forbis <forbisga...@msn.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 10, 4:16=A0am, william mosco <wm5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On May 10, 3:51=A0am, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> wrot=
e:
>
> > > > In article
> > > > <a979edcd-b250-4343-862e-133cd6d19...@a5g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > > > =A0pnyikos <nyik...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > > > On May 3, 4:18=A0am, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkee...@gmail.com> w=
rote:
> > > > > > In article
> > > > > > <b2e33ba3-f5c4-44d5-82da-1780ac890...@2g2000yqp.googlegroups.co=
m>,
>
> > > > > > =A0pnyikos <nyik...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > On May 2, 11:42=A0am, Bret Cahill <Bret_E_Cah...@yahoo.com> w=
rote:
> > > > > > > > The founders would have considered Scalia attempts to weake=
n
> > > > > > > > separation of church and state nothing short of obscene.
>
> > > > > > > You've divined the intent of the founders?
>
> > > > > > didn't you learn about the separation of church and state in gr=
ammar
> > > > > > school,
>
> > > > > I did. =A0Did you?
>
> > > > > If so, you should be able to find at least two attempts by Scalia
> > > > > which a founding father would demonstrably be appalled at.
>
> > > >http://fresnofamous.com/01/05/11/republican-justice-antonin-scalia-d=
e...
> > > > es-be-impeached

Corrupted url.  Couldn't figure out what went in the ellipsis.

> > > >http://kochwatch.org/index.php?q=3Dnode/138

No text, just a headline.  Since Keegan is a pathological liar,
anything he posts which has no text is automatically suspect.

> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Df4g6A-c3AVA

No text, just a headline.  Since Keegan is a pathological liar,
anything he posts which has no text is automatically suspect.

> > > >http://godlessliberals.com/Politics/supreme-court-corruption-thomas-=
a...
> > > > lia-conflict-of-interest-on-citizens-united.html

Corrupted url.  I did find the correct one, but it just took me to
another video accompanied by an allegation by Rachel Maddow [who could
be a Keeanoid liar for all I know] claiming some unidentified
confllict of interest.

I refuse to spend valuable time looking at a YouTube video which might
have as llittle to do with conflict of interest as Keegan's laughable
"evidence" that I am a plagiarist, exposed in the thread which the
following post inaugurated:

Subject: Pathological Liar of the Month (July 2010):
http://groups.google.com/group/tx.politics/msg/f91b0bde06325f20


> > > why didn't you post a link demonstrating a direct conflict of interes=
t
> > > with elana kagan and obama care along with this non-direct conflict o=
f
> > > interest of thomas's wife and obamacare?
>
> > >http://news.investors.com/article/591798/201111151910/elena-kagan-must=
-be-recused-in-obamacare-case.htm
>
> > I especially like the last sentence:
>
> > =A0 =A0Thomas should stay. There's no conflict of interest. Kagan,
> > =A0 =A0though, has to recuse herself if for no other reason than to
> > =A0 =A0protect the integrity of the court.

This suggests strongly that Forbis only sees what he wants to see.

> > I needed a laugh.
>
> read more of silly billy's posts and you'll see much more of the same.

Good solid pieces of evidence, as opposed to videos whose content you
seem to be completely ignorant of.

Peter Nyikos