"Patriot Games" -- who falsely claims to be an "NRA Patron Member" -- says DC handgun ban stands because SCOTUS does not have jurisdiction over DC
Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
possession of handguns in the District.
A DC resident -- who is also a paid shill for the Cato Institute and
the NRA -- sued DC and the case "Heller v. DC" went all the way to
SCOTUS.
SCOTUS decided that the 2nd Amendment establishes an individual right
to gun ownership, but, at the same time, SCOTUS decided that local
authorities can establish reasonable regulations on gun ownership and
use.
Couple of days ago, DC ended their ban on gay marriage. Opponents
filed in federal court and pushed the case to SCOTUS. Chief Justice
Roberts turned down their appeal, thereby allowing the DC gay marriage
law to stand.
When Ol' Kickin' pointed out that SCOTUS is now on record as
supporting same gender marriage, "Patriot Games" declared that SCOTUS
has no jurisdiction over the District of Columbia.
Here are his words and the header for his post:
-- quote
Path:
unlimited.newshosting.com!s02-b44!npeersf02.iad.highwinds-media.com!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!209.197.12.242.MISMATCH!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!216.196.98.150.MISMATCH!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 13:48:50 -0600
From: Patriot Games <Pat...@america.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics
Subject: Re: SCOTUS approves same-gender marriage -- rightwingers on
suicide watch
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:48:51 -0500
Reply-To: Pat...@America.Com
Message-ID: <36fto5p3kdfeaota8...@4ax.com>
References: <ocnro59cnl9eudvmt...@4ax.com>
<escto5lgd9n25ue6v...@4ax.com>
<9da5ce99-4cef-40e7...@v20g2000yqv.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 34
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace:
sv3-2PQ5+OMZIqK435ifgavWEfNrYgqt18dDLL4f/WSADmfB3fYYwTGMMxedy/94rAkJsCQ6+8rshpjavrg!lL//pZmePcvYGy8YCf2E+ic/zbnloNYwVliwlX01bDxZ25xOiadYKXOdd+P12rbPSl2H3wU=
X-Complaints-To: ab...@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2632
Xref: unlimited.newshosting.com alt.politics:5138731
X-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:48:50 UTC (s02-b44)
>On Mar 3, 2:09�pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@america.com> wrote:
>> >The Supreme Court...
>> Didn't approve anything. �They didn't hear the case because they don't
>> have review over the District.
-- END QUOTE
So -- according to that revered Constitutional scholar, "Patriot
Games," the SCOTUS has no jurisdiction over DC and, by that token,
Heller v. DC is NULL, VOID, AND WITHOUT EFFECT. Handguns are still
illegal in the District -- thanks to PG for pointing out this fact.
Meanwhile, you, too, can be an NRA Patron Member -- buy yourself a
NRA Patron Member lapel pin here, wear it to gun shows, and enjoy free
booze and eats at the NRA hospitality booth -- works for Ol' Kickin'
every time -- go to eBay and check out item number 220425957861 .
Patriot Games
<PopUl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Let's review the bidding. The District of Columbia prohibited the
>possession of handguns in the District.
>A DC resident -- who is also a paid shill for the Cato Institute
Oops! Caught LYING. Heller is NOT an employee of the Cato Institute.
His lawyer, Robert A. Levy, IS a Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute,
HOWEVER the Cato Institute did NOT pay for the lawsuit, it was
personally funded by Robert A. Levy.
Robert A. Levy
>and the NRA
Oops! Caught LYING, again. Heller is NOT an employee of the National
Rifle Association.
>-- sued DC and the case "Heller v. DC" went all the way to
>SCOTUS.
>SCOTUS decided that the 2nd Amendment establishes an individual right
>to gun ownership, but, at the same time, SCOTUS decided that local
>authorities can establish reasonable regulations on gun ownership and
>use.
That's almost correct. This is completely correct: 1) The 2nd
Amendment is an individual right; 2) Local authorities can establish
rules and regulations; 3) NOBODY can BAN firearms, including local
authorities.
>Couple of days ago, DC ended their ban on gay marriage. Opponents
>filed in federal court and pushed the case to SCOTUS. Chief Justice
>Roberts turned down their appeal, thereby allowing the DC gay marriage
>law to stand.
>When Ol' Kickin' pointed out that SCOTUS is now on record as
>supporting same gender marriage, "Patriot Games" declared that SCOTUS
>has no jurisdiction over the District of Columbia.
>Here are his words and the header for his post:
>-- quote
You don't need to quote all of that useless stuff. People who don't
understand it aren't impressed and people who do understand it know
it's useless.
You only need this:
>From: Patriot Games <Pat...@america.com>
>Subject: Re: SCOTUS approves same-gender marriage -- rightwingers on
>suicide watch
>Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:48:51 -0500
>Message-ID: <36fto5p3kdfeaota8...@4ax.com>
>>On Mar 3, 2:09�pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@america.com> wrote:
>>> >The Supreme Court...
>>> Didn't approve anything. �They didn't hear the case because they don't
>>> have review over the District.
>-- END QUOTE
>So -- according to that revered Constitutional scholar, "Patriot
>Games," the SCOTUS has no jurisdiction over DC
Oops! Caught LYING, again.
I said SCOTUS doesn't "have review over the District."
YOU SAID "SCOTUS has no jurisdiction over DC."
Oops! Caught LYING, again.
"Article One of the United States Constitution provides for a federal
district, distinct from the states, to serve as the permanent national
capital. [...] However, the United States Congress has supreme
authority over Washington, D.C., and may overturn local laws."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia
>and, by that token,
>Heller v. DC is NULL, VOID, AND WITHOUT EFFECT. Handguns are still
>illegal in the District -- thanks to PG for pointing out this fact.
Oops! Caught LYING, again.
Section 2 of Article Three of the United States Constitution:
"The judicial Power [of SCOTUS] shall extend to all Cases, in Law and
Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United
States, and..."
Since the Heller suit was SPECIFICALLY pertaining to the CONSTITUTION
the Supreme Court DID have review.
Since the Faggot suit was NOT SPECIFICALLY pertaining to the
CONSTITUTION the Supreme Court DID NOT have review.
>Meanwhile, you, too, can be an NRA Patron Member -- buy yourself a
>NRA Patron Member lapel pin here, wear it to gun shows, and enjoy free
>booze and eats at the NRA hospitality booth
Oops! Caught LYING, again.
The pin will NOT get you anything special WITHOUT the Membership Card
which you can ONLY get from the NRA...
You can go rinse your mouth, I'm finished urinating in it.
Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
<Pat...@america.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:31:10 -0500, Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
><PopUl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>Let's review the bidding. The District of Columbia prohibited the
>>possession of handguns in the District.
>>A DC resident -- who is also a paid shill for the Cato Institute
>
>Oops! Caught LYING. Heller is NOT an employee of the Cato Institute.
>His lawyer, Robert A. Levy, IS a Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute,
>HOWEVER the Cato Institute did NOT pay for the lawsuit, it was
>personally funded by Robert A. Levy.
NO CITE = LIE.
>Robert A. Levy
>
>>and the NRA
>
>Oops! Caught LYING, again. Heller is NOT an employee of the National
>Rifle Association.
NO CITE = LIE
>
>>-- sued DC and the case "Heller v. DC" went all the way to
>>SCOTUS.
>>SCOTUS decided that the 2nd Amendment establishes an individual right
>>to gun ownership, but, at the same time, SCOTUS decided that local
>>authorities can establish reasonable regulations on gun ownership and
>>use.
>
>That's almost correct. This is completely correct: 1) The 2nd
>Amendment is an individual right; 2) Local authorities can establish
>rules and regulations; 3) NOBODY can BAN firearms, including local
>authorities.
NO CITE = LIE
PLAYING WITH WORDS.
>
>Oops! Caught LYING, again.
>
>"Article One of the United States Constitution provides for a federal
>district, distinct from the states, to serve as the permanent national
>capital. [...] However, the United States Congress has supreme
>authority over Washington, D.C., and may overturn local laws."
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia
>
>>and, by that token,
>>Heller v. DC is NULL, VOID, AND WITHOUT EFFECT. Handguns are still
>>illegal in the District -- thanks to PG for pointing out this fact.
>
>Oops! Caught LYING, again.
>
>Section 2 of Article Three of the United States Constitution:
>
>"The judicial Power [of SCOTUS] shall extend to all Cases, in Law and
>Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United
>States, and..."
>
>Since the Heller suit was SPECIFICALLY pertaining to the CONSTITUTION
>the Supreme Court DID have review.
NO CITE = LIE.
>
>Since the Faggot suit was NOT SPECIFICALLY pertaining to the
>CONSTITUTION the Supreme Court DID NOT have review.
NO CITE = LIE
>
>>Meanwhile, you, too, can be an NRA Patron Member -- buy yourself a
>>NRA Patron Member lapel pin here, wear it to gun shows, and enjoy free
>>booze and eats at the NRA hospitality booth
>
>Oops! Caught LYING, again.
>
>The pin will NOT get you anything special WITHOUT the Membership Card
>which you can ONLY get from the NRA...
>
NO CITE = LIE
>You can go rinse your mouth, I'm finished urinating in it.
CHECKMATE.
Patriot Games
<PopUl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:24:57 -0500, Patriot Games
><Pat...@america.com> wrote:
>>On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:31:10 -0500, Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
>><PopUl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>Let's review the bidding. The District of Columbia prohibited the
>>>possession of handguns in the District.
>>>A DC resident -- who is also a paid shill for the Cato Institute
>>Oops! Caught LYING. Heller is NOT an employee of the Cato Institute.
>>His lawyer, Robert A. Levy, IS a Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute,
>>HOWEVER the Cato Institute did NOT pay for the lawsuit, it was
>>personally funded by Robert A. Levy.
>NO CITE = LIE.
"Levy financed the lawsuit and served as a co-counsel."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_A._Levy
Thanks for making a FOOL of yourself and saving me some time...
>>Robert A. Levy
>>>and the NRA
>>Oops! Caught LYING, again. Heller is NOT an employee of the National
>>Rifle Association.
>NO CITE = LIE
Thanks for making a FOOL of yourself and saving me some time...
>>>-- sued DC and the case "Heller v. DC" went all the way to
>>>SCOTUS.
>>>SCOTUS decided that the 2nd Amendment establishes an individual right
>>>to gun ownership, but, at the same time, SCOTUS decided that local
>>>authorities can establish reasonable regulations on gun ownership and
>>>use.
>>
>>That's almost correct. This is completely correct: 1) The 2nd
>>Amendment is an individual right; 2) Local authorities can establish
>>rules and regulations; 3) NOBODY can BAN firearms, including local
>>authorities.
>NO CITE = LIE
Thanks for making a FOOL of yourself and saving me some time...
Yes, YOU were.
And YOU were BUSTED for doing so...
Hahahahahahahaha!
>>Oops! Caught LYING, again.
>>"Article One of the United States Constitution provides for a federal
>>district, distinct from the states, to serve as the permanent national
>>capital. [...] However, the United States Congress has supreme
>>authority over Washington, D.C., and may overturn local laws."
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia
>>>and, by that token,
>>>Heller v. DC is NULL, VOID, AND WITHOUT EFFECT. Handguns are still
>>>illegal in the District -- thanks to PG for pointing out this fact.
>>Oops! Caught LYING, again.
>>Section 2 of Article Three of the United States Constitution:
>>"The judicial Power [of SCOTUS] shall extend to all Cases, in Law and
>>Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United
>>States, and..."
>>Since the Heller suit was SPECIFICALLY pertaining to the CONSTITUTION
>>the Supreme Court DID have review.
>NO CITE = LIE.
Thanks for making a FOOL of yourself and saving me some time...
>>Since the Faggot suit was NOT SPECIFICALLY pertaining to the
>>CONSTITUTION the Supreme Court DID NOT have review.
>NO CITE = LIE
Thanks for making a FOOL of yourself and saving me some time...
>>>Meanwhile, you, too, can be an NRA Patron Member -- buy yourself a
>>>NRA Patron Member lapel pin here, wear it to gun shows, and enjoy free
>>>booze and eats at the NRA hospitality booth
>>Oops! Caught LYING, again.
>>The pin will NOT get you anything special WITHOUT the Membership Card
>>which you can ONLY get from the NRA...
>NO CITE = LIE
Thanks for making a FOOL of yourself and saving me some time...
>>You can go rinse your mouth, I'm finished urinating in it.
>CHECKMATE.
You can go rinse your mouth, I'm finished urinating in it.
Hahahahahahhahaha!!!