Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Why Sandy Will Have Zero Impact On the Burning of Fossil Carbon
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Bret Cahill  
View profile  
 More options Nov 5 2012, 5:45 pm
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming, alt.philosophy, alt.politics.economics, alt.politics, sci.econ
From: Bret Cahill <Bret_E_Cah...@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 14:45:41 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Nov 5 2012 5:45 pm
Subject: Re: Why Sandy Will Have Zero Impact On the Burning of Fossil Carbon

> > > > The biggest factor is something every climate scientist will readily
> > > > admit.  Even if all 9 billion humans were somehow induced to stop
> > > > burning fossil carbon tomorrow the earth would still continue to warm
> > > > for decades.

> > > > So even after making all these nearly impossible to meet concessions
> > > > we would still be facing the costs of ever more extreme weather for
> > > > decades.

> > > > The despotic teabag congress is more likely to toss you a bone than
> > > > Mother Nature.

> > > > Any tragedy of the commons situation requires a political solution.
> > > > Most humans don't think on decades long time scales.  Most voters are
> > > > like infants and want -- and need -- relief _now_, i.e., "I want to
> > > > fuel my SUV _now_, THIS MINUTE!"

> > > > Politicians know this and Bloomberg will go back to being mum on the
> > > > matter even before all the lights are back on in NY.

> > > > The argument against geo engineering solutions is that it is
> > > > unpredictable and not "natural."  Unpredictability is better than
> > > > certain death.  Besides we are in effect already doing something that
> > > > isn't natural.  We are already geo engineering, just not in the right
> > > > direction.

> > > Darwin will provide the solution, in good time.

> > A lot of deniers are like Earth Firsters -- complete contempt for
> > human life.

> > Bret Cahill- Hide quoted text -

> > - Show quoted text -

> I hope you are the first to freeze in the dark or be eaten alive by a
> wild animal while huddled in a cave

Deniers not only have contempt for human life but science and thought
as well.  This proves that H. Heine was correct.

Anyway no one suggested immediately getting off fossil fuel.  That's
why many are looking at geo engineering.

Bret Cahill

"Those who burn books will, before long, burn human beings."

-- H. Heine.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.