Still filing your stupid bogus "abuse" complaints, I see! LOL! Notice how
I'm still here, abusing you, Demmie?
LOL@U
Now be a good little frustrated Demmie and go file another "abuse"
complaint! Run to mummy, lil' Demmie, run to mummy.......
He's just pointing out your dishonesty.
You're the one jumping up and down like a hyperactive jack rabbit
Christ you are dumb.
What "dishonesty" might that be, snookums??
I haven't filed any abuse complaints. You might try getting a fact or
two straight in your brain before you go off like that.
I've simply pointed out that you post as multiple personae,
idiotically responding to yourself as if there were others in
agreement with you, when in reality it's just you talking to yourself.
A form a self-gratification, it would seem.
The dishonesty of your pretending to the newsgroup-reading public that
your posts come from different people when in fact they are all you
talking to yourself. That dishonesty.
Well GET ON WITH IT THEN, laddy! What are you waiting for, the next
Michael Moore "documentary"??
You stupid Demmie asshole......
Oh, you mean the same "dishonesty" as the Demmie posters here who post under
multiple handles? You mean THAT "dishonesty", you stupid Demmie asshole??
Now go run to mummy again, little boy.......
The lies and deception of the radical right-wing continue.
Starving for attention and the need to thwart twit filters, this wack-job
has to date created 19 different ID's - all the same person, all posting
within the same day, some within minutes of each other, some responding to
the others.
"Kerry Looks 10 Points Down"
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.91.121.233
X-Complaints-To: ab...@earthlink.net
"Johnny Trails Bighten"
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.91.121.233
X-Complaints-To: ab...@earthlink.net
"Empty Suit Johnny"
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.91.121.233
X-Complaints-To: ab...@earthlink.net
"Olivia de Place Kerry"
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.91.121.233
X-Complaints-To: ab...@earthlink.net
"Oliver de Place Kerry"
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.91.121.233
X-Complaints-To: ab...@earthlink.net
"Senator AWOL Johnny"
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.91.121.233
X-Complaints-To: ab...@earthlink.net
"13 Percent Johnny"
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.91.121.233
X-Complaints-To: ab...@earthlink.net
"300,000 new jobs a month"
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.91.121.233
X-Complaints-To: ab...@earthlink.net
"over 300,000 new jobs a month"
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.91.121.233
X-Complaints-To: ab...@earthlink.net
John 'Lurch' Kerry
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.91.121.233
X-Complaints-To: ab...@earthlink.net
John 'Middle Finger' Kerry
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.91.121.233
X-Complaints-To: ab...@earthlink.net
John "Arrogant" Kerry
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.91.121.233
X-Complaints-To: ab...@earthlink.net
KerryDependsOnGoreRants
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.91.121.233
X-Complaints-To: ab...@earthlink.net
GoreRants4Kerry
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.91.121.233
X-Complaints-To: ab...@earthlink.net
"Kerry the Boob"
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.91.121.233
X-Complaints-To: ab...@earthlink.net
"Ihatekerie Sosume"
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.91.121.233
X-Complaints-To: ab...@earthlink.net
"UnfitKerry"
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.91.121.233
X-Complaints-To: ab...@earthlink.net
"Jeanne Frawd Kerree"
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.91.121.233
X-Complaints-To: ab...@earthlink.net
"John Fraude Kerry"
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.91.121.233
X-Complaints-To: ab...@earthlink.net
Right-wingers are cowards, charlatans, have no morals, and are a plague on
this great nation.
--
-Mr. N
-------------------------------------------
"I believe that the president's leadership in the actions taken in Iraq
demonstrate an incompetence in terms of knowledge,
judgment and experience in making the decisions that would have been
necessary to truly accomplish the mission without the
deaths to our troops and the cost to our taxpayers."
"The emperor has no clothes. When are people going to face the reality?
Pull this curtain back."
-Nancy Pelosi, American Patriot
>> The dishonesty of your pretending to the newsgroup-reading public that
>> your posts come from different people when in fact they are all you
>> talking to yourself. That dishonesty.
>
>
>Oh, you mean the same "dishonesty" as the Demmie posters here who post under
>multiple handles?
Prove it.
Prove it with evidence like NNTP Posting Host.
>You mean THAT "dishonesty", you stupid Demmie asshole??
No. He means YOUR *proven* dishonesty.
That you are a computer iliiterate who doesn't understand what an NNTP
posting host is is neither here nor there.
You are highly flexible about your own morality yet are *absolute*
about the morality of others.
Another reason to laugh at you.
And they are surprised when they keep losing one election after another??
Go drool on yourself some more for us, Steve......
"SteveL" <stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:cOWdnWl-cOO...@giganews.com...
>Poor drooling Demmies! They spend all day long, playing with their "NNTP
>Posting Host" investigations, rather than even ATTEMPTING to address the
>issues being posted.
Takes two seconds. And your "issues" are expressed with the same lack
of honesty as your sockpupptery. As are your creatively snipped
responses,.
Why don't you get an ISP/NSP that doesn't expose your dishonesty?
Because to do so would be an admission to us "demmies" that you knew
your were wrong.
You'd never do that. You condition wouldn't allow it.
>
>And they are surprised when they keep losing one election after another??
So you think exposing your personal dishonesty is costing the
Democrats elections.
PHEW!
>
>Go drool on yourself some more for us, Steve......
No I suspect you need to clean off some of it yourself !!
LOL!
And you know what the best part is, Stevie? The results are TOTALLY
MEANINGLESS!
Why? Because you drooling Demmies STILL can't debate the issues!
LOL@U!
Now go run to mummy again......
Nope, it "proves" no such thing. The ONLY thing you have proven is the
following:
1) You are seeing posts, under different handles, coming from the same IP
address. That does not, repeat NOT, "prove" that only "one person" is
posting from that IP address. Apparently the concept of "networked PCs" is
one you are not yet familiar with.
2) It proves that silly Demmies such as yourself spend a great portion of
your waking hours trying to figure out "who's who", rather than trying to
come up with ways to defend the Democrat Party Agenda.
Now go run to mummy again, little demmie boy......
No sale. It's you. Same vocabulary, same foibles. Same insane
politics. Same IP address.
You are a LIAR. Isn't there some comandment inyour neocon Bible that
frowns on that? Or have you rewritten that too?
How amusing, coming from one of you demmies who asserts that all "neocons"
are alike.......
Try again, dodo.
> They prove that you are posting as different people, in the same
> threads offering bogus support to your own insane positions.. Don't
> you lecture liberals on morality.
You have provided no such proof.
Check the NNTP Posting Host field in the headers.
Been there, done that. As he said, that doesn't provide the proof for your
assertion.
>
>"SteveL" <stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
>news:5YWdnfeBHIv...@giganews.com...
>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 11:29:09 -0500, "Bob" <n...@email.address> wrote:
>>
>> >"SteveL" <stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
>> >news:oMidnWVP2bU...@giganews.com...
>> >
>> >> They prove that you are posting as different people, in the same
>> >> threads offering bogus support to your own insane positions.. Don't
>> >> you lecture liberals on morality.
>> >
>> >You have provided no such proof.
>> >
>>
>> Check the NNTP Posting Host field in the headers.
>
>
>Been there, done that. As he said, that doesn't provide the proof for your
>assertion.
>
>Now go run to mummy again......
>
Oh but it does Babs. If you want to pretend that you've set up a
single internet facing address that a bunch of NAT'ed PCs are sat
behind - with reams of different people all uniquely named and all
posting the same opinionated warped, crazy John Kerry obsessed,
Liberal Obsessed manure to the same political news groups and to the
same threads, all supporting each other and answering each other etc.
etc. then feel free. But you look even more pathetic than you did ten
minutes ago.
Look at it this way. It's orders of magnitude more proof than Bush had
for his justification for Iraq.
It'll be interesting to see if Bob agrees with you or realises that
there are certain limits to offering suppport for reasons of political
cameraderie.
> Why? Because you drooling Demmies STILL can't debate the issues!
issues? so you mean that when you say "bush never linked hussein to 9/11",
that it's an 'issue' to debate?
you go, girl. we'll watch you debate amongst your many monikers. i'd love
to see who wins.
--
TheTruthHurts.
Probability is not the same as proof.
>"SteveL" <stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
>news:5YWdnfeBHIv...@giganews.com...
>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 11:29:09 -0500, "Bob" <n...@email.address> wrote:
>>
>> >"SteveL" <stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
>> >news:oMidnWVP2bU...@giganews.com...
>> >
>> >> They prove that you are posting as different people, in the same
>> >> threads offering bogus support to your own insane positions.. Don't
>> >> you lecture liberals on morality.
>> >
>> >You have provided no such proof.
>> >
>>
>> Check the NNTP Posting Host field in the headers.
>
>Probability is not the same as proof.
>
You want to be a pedant then I'll play the game too.
Depends on the standards of "proof".
The standards of scientific proof are such that almost anything Babs
said - no matter how outlandish -- that was physically possible would
negate any claims of "proof" against him/her/it.. Relative likelyhood
has nothing to do with it.
Standards of proof in criminal law are somewhat lower, and in civil
law lower still,
Nobody is claiming the former.
Do you think an alibi which proposes that 20 or so different people
(and increasing daily) are all posting from the same Internet-facing
address, are all posting the exactly the same John Kerry obsessed,
Liberal Obsessed opinions to the same political news groups and to the
same threads, all supporting each other and answering each other etc.
etc falls under "reasonable doubt"?
If you were on a jury what would your verdict be?
Babs is dishonestly sockpuppeting support for itself by pretending to
be different people in the same threads. The NNTP posting address is,
shall we say, *extremely strongly indicative* of that.
> Babs is dishonestly sockpuppeting support for itself by pretending to
> be different people in the same threads. The NNTP posting address is,
> shall we say, *extremely strongly indicative* of that.
Besides, all of his posts are, shall we say, semantically "consonant."
Perhaps two people, each using
more than one name.
> If you were on a jury what would your verdict be?
If IP address is your only evidence, not
guilty.
> Babs is dishonestly sockpuppeting support for itself by pretending to
> be different people in the same threads. The NNTP posting address is,
> shall we say, *extremely strongly indicative* of that.
Why do you care about that, even if
it's true?
>
>Perhaps two people, each using
>more than one name.
Then two people are being dishonest. You think that's more likely than
one person, Bob?
Do you really think its likely that two people (even) would post
exactly the same things to the same groups and stick up for each other
in the same threads from the same (private, not corporate) IP address?
>
>> If you were on a jury what would your verdict be?
>
>If IP address is your only evidence, not
>guilty.
Is that really the only evidence? Nothing in the content of the posts,
nothing in the the subject matter? The *identical* opinions, identical
vocabulary?
C'mon Bob. Do you think there is more than one person here? Simple
question.
Don't pretend to be sitting neutrally above the fray.
>
>> Babs is dishonestly sockpuppeting support for itself by pretending to
>> be different people in the same threads. The NNTP posting address is,
>> shall we say, *extremely strongly indicative* of that.
>
>Why do you care about that, even if
>it's true?
>
Oh I don't know. Perhaps because it is dishonest, Bob.
Perhaps I don't like people who when cornered respond with projection
like this:
"Oh, you mean the same "dishonesty" as the Demmie posters here who
post under multiple handles?"
This from the king/queen of doing just that.
Damn right they get called on it.
> Do you really think its likely that two people (even) would post
> exactly the same things to the same groups and stick up for each other
> in the same threads from the same (private, not corporate) IP address?
I don't know, and I don't care.
> >> If you were on a jury what would your verdict be?
> >
> >If IP address is your only evidence, not
> >guilty.
>
> Is that really the only evidence? Nothing in the content of the posts,
> nothing in the the subject matter? The *identical* opinions, identical
> vocabulary?
>
> C'mon Bob. Do you think there is more than one person here? Simple
> question.
I don't know.
>"SteveL" <stev...@deletethisbitntlworld.com> wrote in message
>news:ie6dnRhhPaV...@giganews.com...
>
>> Do you really think its likely that two people (even) would post
>> exactly the same things to the same groups and stick up for each other
>> in the same threads from the same (private, not corporate) IP address?
>
>I don't know, and I don't care.
>
So why have you made like, four posts on this topic then?
Why don't you want to see flagrant dishonesty exposed, instead of
wanting to defend it and/or imply that the accusers are slightly batty
or something. just because the dishonesty is coming from a right wing
source?
Never mind answering.
This thread has run its course.