GOP senators push for 'mainstream' court nominee
Major Debacle
___________
WASHINGTON — GOP senators who will help shape the review of President
Barack Obama's next nominee to the Supreme Court said Sunday he must
pick someone with "mainstream" judicial views to avoid a potential
filibuster.
more...
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jp9jrwkjig6vQnONc-Zyk9lChX8wD9F0UTVG0
--
Beer... so much more than a breakfast drink
Shall not be infringed
wrote:
> In other words, they want a white conservative male
Why not another "wise" minority? Lots of ACORN attorneys are out of
work right now?
> ___________
>
> WASHINGTON — GOP senators who will help shape the review of President
> Barack Obama's next nominee to the Supreme Court said Sunday he must
> pick someone with "mainstream" judicial views to avoid a potential
> filibuster.
>
> more...http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jp9jrwkjig6vQnONc-Z...
The PHANTOM
wrote:
> In other words, they want a white conservative male
> ___________
>
> WASHINGTON — GOP senators who will help shape the review of President
> Barack Obama's next nominee to the Supreme Court said Sunday he must
> pick someone with "mainstream" judicial views to avoid a potential
> filibuster.
>
> --
> Beer... so much more than a breakfast drink
The (R)s should use the same tactics as the (P)s did every time Bush
wanted to nominate someone to the SCOTUS. They should block that
nomination NO MATTER WHO the nominee is.
robert bowman
> In other words, they want a white conservative male
At least not another wise Latina. Are there any eligible jurors of Asian
descent, male or female?
Shall not be infringed
Reminds me of the time that Newt shut down the Gov't. The media
crucified him.
Too_Many_Tools
>
> - Show quoted text -
As the voters will crucify the Republicans in November.
TMT
Klaus Shadenfreude
<too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns:
>As the voters will crucify the Republicans in November.
Is that the same crystal ball that told you NOT to show up at
Sunnyside terrace?
[chuckle]
___________
"I will be bringing the local cops with me to visit you so be sure you
have enough doughnuts for all of us. ;<)"
-Too Many Tools, 5/30/09
"Try posting your real address just once and I will
guarantee you a visit."
-Too Many Tools, 6/2/09, right before
he scrambled for excuses not to show up.
"Got a valid address yet winger?
I would like to arraign[sic] a visit for you."
-Too Many Tools, 6/19/09, still hoping
someone actually believes him.
"Give us a valid address and we can arraign [sic] a playdate with some
friends."
-Too Many Tools 7-1-2009 STILL trying to get
someone to believe him
"Show a picture of your mailbox then...with you in front of it. ;<)"
-Too Many Tools 7-2-2009 changing the conditions in
another desperate attempt to weasel out of visiting
"Provide the information and you will receive a visit."
-Too Many Tools, 9-16-2009, yet again making promises
he has no intention of keeping.
"Why don't you provide us with a valid name and address ...and we will
arrange a visit for you."
-Too Many Tools, 9-20-2009, yet *again* making promises
he has no intention of keeping.
"Got your real address yet?"
-Too Many Tools, 3-4-2010, STILL trying to make believe
he can work up the courage to "visit" someone.
"Did you post a real address yet?"
-Too Many Tools, 3-4-2010, wanting so hard to convince
anyone who will listen...
Kevin Cunningham
Yeah, the repugs have nominated such good nominess, like Clement
Hainesworth who was arrested in a mens room later on. Clement was a
queer but so what, he was a repug so he would have been a great
supreme court justice.
Just like Scalia, the justice who can't figure out what the law is.
He's in favor of.....well, some stuff, he's not sure. He lets Justice
Thomas carry his golf bag, see, he's not a segregationist, he's a
White Citizen's Council kinda' guy.
Gunner Asch
<sms...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>On Apr 11, 1:35 pm, The PHANTOM <hoofhearte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Apr 11, 12:11 pm, Major Debacle <major_deba...@invalid.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > In other words, they want a white conservative male
>> > ___________
>>
>> > WASHINGTON — GOP senators who will help shape the review of President
>> > Barack Obama's next nominee to the Supreme Court said Sunday he must
>> > pick someone with "mainstream" judicial views to avoid a potential
>> > filibuster.
>>
>> > more...http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jp9jrwkjig6vQnONc-Z...
>> > --
>> > Beer... so much more than a breakfast drink
>>
>> The (R)s should use the same tactics as the (P)s did every time Bush
>> wanted to nominate someone to the SCOTUS. They should block that
>> nomination NO MATTER WHO the nominee is.
>
>Yeah, the repugs have nominated such good nominess, like Clement
>Hainesworth who was arrested in a mens room later on. Clement was a
>queer but so what, he was a repug so he would have been a great
>supreme court justice.
So you are biased against gays? Seems more and more, you show yourself
to be a Far Leftwing Extremist Fringe Kook Bigot.
Pity about that. But..after all..you are mentally ill..so it may not be
your fault.
Shrug..but in less than 2 yrs..you will be dead, so its not a terrible
loss to the species.
>
>Just like Scalia, the justice who can't figure out what the law is.
>He's in favor of.....well, some stuff, he's not sure. He lets Justice
>Thomas carry his golf bag, see, he's not a segregationist, he's a
>White Citizen's Council kinda' guy.
Ive asked for a video or photos of your death. Ill enjoy watching them
very much.
Gunner
"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.
This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost
Shall not be infringed
>
> TMT
You should be more specific... As the Tea Party will crucify liberal
Republicans. And of course, the dems are going down.
Lookout
Shall not be infringed
> Shall not be infringed <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Apr 11, 2:49 pm, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> > On Apr 11, 1:35 pm, The PHANTOM <hoofhearte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> > Reminds me of the time that Newt shut down the Gov't. The media
> >> > crucified him.
>
> >> As the voters will crucify the Republicans in November.
>
> >Republicans. And of course, the dems are going down.
>
They got scared on exactly one vote. What are they doing the rest of
the time?
And you want to give them a pass?
> It seems you are more into the R vs D fight than liberal vs
> conservative. Why is no one surprised by that?
Why do you say that? I was pretty clear about voting for
conservatives but somehow you missed it.
Major Debacle
> On Apr 11, 1:35 pm, The PHANTOM <hoofhearte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Apr 11, 12:11 pm, Major Debacle <major_deba...@invalid.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In other words, they want a white conservative male
>>> ___________
>>> WASHINGTON — GOP senators who will help shape the review of President
>>> Barack Obama's next nominee to the Supreme Court said Sunday he must
>>> pick someone with "mainstream" judicial views to avoid a potential
>>> filibuster.
>>> more...http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jp9jrwkjig6vQnONc-Z...
>>> --
>>> Beer... so much more than a breakfast drink
>> The (R)s should use the same tactics as the (P)s did every time Bush
>> wanted to nominate someone to the SCOTUS. They should block that
>> nomination NO MATTER WHO the nominee is.
>
> Yeah, the repugs have nominated such good nominess, like Clement
> Hainesworth who was arrested in a mens room later on.
Cite?
> Clement was a
> queer but so what, he was a repug so he would have been a great
> supreme court justice.
>
> Just like Scalia, the justice who can't figure out what the law is.
> He's in favor of.....well, some stuff, he's not sure. He lets Justice
> Thomas carry his golf bag, see, he's not a segregationist, he's a
> White Citizen's Council kinda' guy.
Shall not be infringed
> Shall not be infringed <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Apr 11, 7:27 pm, Winston_Smith <not_r...@bogus.net> wrote:
> >> Shall not be infringed <hot-ham-and-che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Apr 11, 2:49 pm, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >> On Apr 11, 1:46 pm, Shall not be infringed <hot-ham-and-wrote:
> >> >> > On Apr 11, 1:35 pm, The PHANTOM <hoofhearte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >> > Reminds me of the time that Newt shut down the Gov't. The media
> >> >> > crucified him.
>
> >> >> As the voters will crucify the Republicans in November.
>
> >> >You should be more specific... As the Tea Party will crucify liberal
> >> >Republicans. And of course, the dems are going down.
>
> >> The conservative dems too ???? Don't forget the Blue Dog Democrats.
>
> >They got scared on exactly one vote. What are they doing the rest of
> >the time?
>
> >And you want to give them a pass?
>
> voted for the most liberal bills at a time when they were an
> unstoppable majority.
>
> Will you give them a pass when they come up for election again because
> they are making the right campaign speeches now?
Maybe I'm not making myself clear. Most of the Republicans need to
go.
> >> It seems you are more into the R vs D fight than liberal vs
> >> conservative. Why is no one surprised by that?
>
> >Why do you say that? I was pretty clear about voting for
> >conservatives but somehow you missed it.
>
> Are you for conservatives that are also Democrat or just for ones that
> are Republican/NeoCon/Tea Party?
Give me a list of conservative democrats that I can vote for. Thanks.
Lookout
wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:49:07 -0700 (PDT), Too_Many_Tools
>Are you a betting man? I mean do you actually have the faith of your
>convictions to put something of worth where your mouth is on the
>matter?
HAHAHA Another chicken shit Internet threat!
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Lookout
wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 16:27:15 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_...@bogus.net>
>wrote:
>
>>Shall not be infringed <hot-ham-a...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>On Apr 11, 2:49 pm, Too_Many_Tools <too_many_to...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> On Apr 11, 1:46 pm, Shall not be infringed <hot-ham-and-wrote:
>>>> > On Apr 11, 1:35 pm, The PHANTOM <hoofhearte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> > Reminds me of the time that Newt shut down the Gov't. The media
>>>> > crucified him.
>>>>
>>>> As the voters will crucify the Republicans in November.
>>>>
>>>You should be more specific... As the Tea Party will crucify liberal
>>>Republicans. And of course, the dems are going down.
>>
>>The conservative dems too ???? Don't forget the Blue Dog Democrats.
>>
>>It seems you are more into the R vs D fight than liberal vs
>>conservative. Why is no one surprised by that?
>>
>It continues to amaze me at the number of people who are more
>concerned about the so-called Party affiliation of the person running
>for office as opposed to their ideas, personal convictions, and
>overall character. i.e. whatever happened to voting for somebody
>based on your personal belief that they can & will do the job?
Federal laws governing, UNgoverning party spendings has changed all
that.
Too_Many_Tools
> Gunner Asch <gunnera...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:48:47 -0700 (PDT), Kevin Cunningham wrote:
> >>Yeah, the repugs have nominated such good nominess, like Clement
> >>Hainesworth who was arrested in a mens room later on. Clement was a
> >>queer but so what, he was a repug so he would have been a great
> >>supreme court justice.
>
> >So you are biased against gays? Seems more and more, you show yourself
> >to be a Far Leftwing Extremist Fringe Kook Bigot.
>
>
> Are you seriously trying to tell us that anti-gay is a left wing
> position?
>
> That's as bad as TMT (the other chronic threat maker on the group)
> telling us that all welfare recipients vote for the Republicans.
> __
> WS in a.s and m.s
> Two parties, not a dimes worth of difference.
Please list the threats that I have made.
I need a good laugh....that is besides picking the wings off
conservatives.
TMT
Too_Many_Tools
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:49:07 -0700 (PDT), Too_Many_Tools
>
>
>
>
>
> convictions to put something of worth where your mouth is on the
> matter?
>
> "Gustatus Similis Pullus"- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Why?
Aren't you?
TMT
Klaus Shadenfreude
<too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns:
LOL
When are you coming to Sunnyside Terrace?
Gray Ghost
news:4a65s59f69kbj87rg...@4ax.com:
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:49:07 -0700 (PDT), Too_Many_Tools
><too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On Apr 11, 1:46 pm, Shall not be infringed <hot-ham-and-
>>che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Apr 11, 1:35 pm, The PHANTOM <hoofhearte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > On Apr 11, 12:11 pm, Major Debacle <major_deba...@invalid.invalid>
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> > > In other words, they want a white conservative male ___________
>>>
>>> > > WASHINGTON — GOP senators who will help shape the review of
>>> > > President Barack Obama's next nominee to the Supreme Court said
>>> > > Sunday he must pick someone with "mainstream" judicial views to
>>> > > avoid a potential filibuster.
>>>
>>> > > more...http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jp9jrwkjig6
>>> > > vQnONc-Z... --
>>> > > Beer... so much more than a breakfast drink
>>>
>>> > The (R)s should use the same tactics as the (P)s did every time Bush
>>> > wanted to nominate someone to the SCOTUS. They should block that
>>> > nomination NO MATTER WHO the nominee is.
>>>
>>> Reminds me of the time that Newt shut down the Gov't. The media
>>> crucified him.- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>>As the voters will crucify the Republicans in November.
>>
> Are you a betting man? I mean do you actually have the faith of your
> convictions to put something of worth where your mouth is on the
> matter?
You're serious? he claimed the address I gave wasn't my real address so I
challenged him to a $500 wager that it was. Yo date the little coward hasn't
taken me up on it. You see, he's long on mouth and short on proof and courage.
But then again that is an indicator for a progressive.
--
God, guns and guts made America great.
And Janet Napolitano nervous.
Which should tell you all you need to know about Democrats. How can one
restore America to greatness if greatness makes you uncomfortable?
Lookout
So...are you gay?
Lookout
If you're talking about me then show us where I said that. I DIDN'T
say any such thing and I've asked several times for you to prove it
and you haven't. The reason is because you're lying AGAIN>
>Yo date the little coward hasn't
>taken me up on it. You see, he's long on mouth and short on proof and courage.
When are you going to meet me in Birmingham?
Chicken shit
Major Debacle
> On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:20:22 -0500, grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com
> (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>
>> Zombywoof <fish...@live.com> wrote in
>> news:4a65s59f69kbj87rg...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:49:07 -0700 (PDT), Too_Many_Tools
>>> <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Apr 11, 1:35Â pm, The PHANTOM <hoofhearte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 11, 12:11Â pm, Major Debacle <major_deba...@invalid.invalid>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> In other words, they want a white conservative male ___________
>>>>>>> President Barack Obama's next nominee to the Supreme Court said
>>>>>>> Sunday he must pick someone with "mainstream" judicial views to
>>>>>>> avoid a potential filibuster.
>>>>>>> more...http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jp9jrwkjig6
>>>>>>> vQnONc-Z... --
>>>>>>> Beer... so much more than a breakfast drink
>>>>>> The (R)s should use the same tactics as the (P)s did every time Bush
>>>>>> wanted to nominate someone to the SCOTUS. They should block that
>>>>>> nomination NO MATTER WHO the nominee is.
>>>>> crucified him.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>
>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>> As the voters will crucify the Republicans in November.
>>>>
>>> Are you a betting man? I mean do you actually have the faith of your
>>> convictions to put something of worth where your mouth is on the
>>> matter?
>> You're serious? he claimed the address I gave wasn't my real address so I
>> challenged him to a $500 wager that it was.
>
> If you're talking about me then show us where I said that. I DIDN'T
> say any such thing and I've asked several times for you to prove it
> and you haven't. The reason is because you're lying AGAIN>
>
>> Yo date the little coward hasn't
>> taken me up on it. You see, he's long on mouth and short on proof and courage.
>
> When are you going to meet me in Birmingham?
Are you cruising fer gay sex on usenet again?
Gray Ghost
news:k1k6s511ql82f4i85...@4ax.com:
> On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:20:22 -0500, grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com
> (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>
>>Zombywoof <fish...@live.com> wrote in
>>news:4a65s59f69kbj87rg...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:49:07 -0700 (PDT), Too_Many_Tools
>>><too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Apr 11, 1:46 pm, Shall not be infringed <hot-ham-and-
>>>>che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Apr 11, 1:35 pm, The PHANTOM <hoofhearte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> > On Apr 11, 12:11 pm, Major Debacle <major_deba...@invalid.invalid>
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > > In other words, they want a white conservative male ___________
>>>>>
>>>>> > > WASHINGTON — GOP senators who will help shape the review of
>>>>> > > President Barack Obama's next nominee to the Supreme Court said
>>>>> > > Sunday he must pick someone with "mainstream" judicial views to
>>>>> > > avoid a potential filibuster.
>>>>>
>>>>> > > more...http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jp9jrwkji
>>>>> > > g6 vQnONc-Z... --
>>>>> > > Beer... so much more than a breakfast drink
>>>>>
>>>>> > The (R)s should use the same tactics as the (P)s did every time
>>>>> > Bush wanted to nominate someone to the SCOTUS. They should block
>>>>> > that nomination NO MATTER WHO the nominee is.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reminds me of the time that Newt shut down the Gov't. The media
>>>>> crucified him.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>
>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>
>>>>As the voters will crucify the Republicans in November.
>>>>
>>> Are you a betting man? I mean do you actually have the faith of your
>>> convictions to put something of worth where your mouth is on the
>>> matter?
>>
>>You're serious? he claimed the address I gave wasn't my real address so I
>>challenged him to a $500 wager that it was.
>
> If you're talking about me then show us where I said that. I DIDN'T
> say any such thing and I've asked several times for you to prove it
> and you haven't. The reason is because you're lying AGAIN>
La, la, la. Backtrack, backtrack, backtrack.
>
>>Yo date the little coward hasn't
>>taken me up on it. You see, he's long on mouth and short on proof and
>>courage.
>
> When are you going to meet me in Birmingham?
Show me where I said that.
>
> Chicken shit
>
Makes good fertilizer.
Gray Ghost
@4ax.com:
Why, is there something wrong with being gay?
dacato
> On Apr 11, 12:11 pm, Major Debacle <major_deba...@invalid.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > In other words, they want a white conservative male
> > ___________
>
> > WASHINGTON — GOP senators who will help shape the review of President
> > Barack Obama's next nominee to the Supreme Court said Sunday he must
> > pick someone with "mainstream" judicial views to avoid a potential
> > filibuster.
>
> > more...http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jp9jrwkjig6vQnONc-Z...
> > --
> > Beer... so much more than a breakfast drink
>
> The (R)s should use the same tactics as the (P)s did every time Bush
> wanted to nominate someone to the SCOTUS. They should block that
> nomination NO MATTER WHO the nominee is.
For what possible purpose?
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
Just looking for the truth. You don't like that...why?
>
>>
>>>Yo date the little coward hasn't
>>>taken me up on it. You see, he's long on mouth and short on proof and
>>>courage.
>>
>> When are you going to meet me in Birmingham?
>
>Show me where I said that.
Ok. I'll go look for it tonite.
Lookout
Did I say there was?
Gray Ghost
news:ij57s55a3vhj4jpug...@4ax.com:
> On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:03:28 -0500, grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com
> (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>
>>Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>news:k1k6s511ql82f4i85...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 10:20:22 -0500, grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com
>>> (Gray Ghost) wrote:
>>>
>>>>Zombywoof <fish...@live.com> wrote in
>>>>news:4a65s59f69kbj87rg...@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:49:07 -0700 (PDT), Too_Many_Tools
>>>>><too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Apr 11, 1:46 pm, Shall not be infringed <hot-ham-and-
>>>>>>che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Apr 11, 1:35 pm, The PHANTOM <hoofhearte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > On Apr 11, 12:11 pm, Major Debacle
>>>>>>> > <major_deba...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > > In other words, they want a white conservative male ___________
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > > WASHINGTON — GOP senators who will help shape the review of
>>>>>>> > > President Barack Obama's next nominee to the Supreme Court said
>>>>>>> > > Sunday he must pick someone with "mainstream" judicial views to
>>>>>>> > > avoid a potential filibuster.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > > more...http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jp9jrwk
>>>>>>> > > ji g6 vQnONc-Z... --
>>>>>>> > > Beer... so much more than a breakfast drink
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > The (R)s should use the same tactics as the (P)s did every time
>>>>>>> > Bush wanted to nominate someone to the SCOTUS. They should block
>>>>>>> > that nomination NO MATTER WHO the nominee is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Reminds me of the time that Newt shut down the Gov't. The media
>>>>>>> crucified him.- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>As the voters will crucify the Republicans in November.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Are you a betting man? I mean do you actually have the faith of your
>>>>> convictions to put something of worth where your mouth is on the
>>>>> matter?
>>>>
>>>>You're serious? he claimed the address I gave wasn't my real address so
>>>>I challenged him to a $500 wager that it was.
>>>
>>> If you're talking about me then show us where I said that. I DIDN'T
>>> say any such thing and I've asked several times for you to prove it
>>> and you haven't. The reason is because you're lying AGAIN>
>>
>>La, la, la. Backtrack, backtrack, backtrack.
>
> Just looking for the truth. You don't like that...why?
>>
>>>
>>>>Yo date the little coward hasn't
>>>>taken me up on it. You see, he's long on mouth and short on proof and
>>>>courage.
>>>
>>> When are you going to meet me in Birmingham?
>>
>>Show me where I said that.
>
> Ok. I'll go look for it tonite.
You must have a really pathetic life.
>>
>>>
>>> Chicken shit
>>>
>>
>>Makes good fertilizer.
--
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
Nah..I doing dialysis tonite and it takes 2 hours and 47 minutes.
Pulling up all your old posts and going through them won't take long.
Shall not be infringed
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 17:22:23 -0700 (PDT), Shall not be infringed
> up for re-election, and who is currently running for them.
It absolutely does. Our dem who is up for reelection decided to
RETIRE.
Dammit! He cheated us out of defeating him.
> Another
> factor I would consider is candidates who've changed Parties for
> elecabilities sake.
I'll betch some do exactly that. I hope that jackass in Pennsylvania
gets his ass handed to him.
> --
>
> "Gustatus Similis Pullus"
Gunner Asch
wrote:
To keep useless eaters and leftists off the SCOTUS would be the first
reason.
Need more?
Gunner
"First Law of Leftist Debate
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence
that is counter to his preconceived world view and the
more difficult it becomes for him to refute it without
losing face the chance of him calling you a racist, bigot,
homophobe approaches infinity.
This is despite the thread you are in having not mentioned
race or sexual preference in any way that is relevant to
the subject." Grey Ghost
Gray Ghost
news:hc87s59ohqtutgecg...@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>> > > wk ji g6 vQnONc-Z... --
Well then, may your machine malfunction. No wonder you're so angry.
Lookout
(Gray Ghost) wrote:
Nope. Not angry at all. I consider myself lucky that I can do home
hemodialysis. I'm one of very few who can do it.
And I lost kidney function due to the immunosuppressants I take post
liver transplant. I had to get the liver transplant while I was on
active duty saving lives.
Not angry at all. I was simply helping other soldiers, sailors, airmen
and Marines and sometimes shit happens.
Lookout
wrote:
>On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 23:37:25 -0500, Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com>
>So a "Federal Law" means you don't give a crap about who is running
>for office, only the Party they belong to?
Nope. Wrong again dummy
Lookout
wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:59:58 -0500, Lookout <mrLo...@yahoo.com>
>Then what did you attempt to say?
Read it slower.
Christopher Helms
wrote:
> In other words, they want a white conservative male
> ___________
>
> WASHINGTON — GOP senators who will help shape the review of President
> Barack Obama's next nominee to the Supreme Court said Sunday he must
> pick someone with "mainstream" judicial views to avoid a potential
> filibuster.
>
> more...http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jp9jrwkjig6vQnONc-Z...
> --
> Beer... so much more than a breakfast drink
Since the Republicans define "mainstream" as Right Wing Fanatic they
might as well start filibustering now and get it the hell over with.
Don't waste your time waiting for the nominee, just declare he/she a
fucking commie right now and start lamenting the fact that Obama can't
nominate someone with the "correct" political temperament. Maybe
someone who "unknowingly" belonged to a racist organization in college
(Alito), or who had a serious pill problem along with a clause in the
deed to his house that forbade its ownership by Jews (Rehnquist), or
who refers to himself in the third person (Scalia), has bizarre ideas
about the power of the presidency (Bork) or plays the race card
whenever his credibility is questioned (Thomas).
Shall not be infringed
> On Apr 11, 12:11 pm, Major Debacle <major_deba...@invalid.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > In other words, they want a white conservative male
> > ___________
>
> > WASHINGTON — GOP senators who will help shape the review of President
> > Barack Obama's next nominee to the Supreme Court said Sunday he must
> > pick someone with "mainstream" judicial views to avoid a potential
> > filibuster.
>
> > more...http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jp9jrwkjig6vQnONc-Z...
> > --
> > Beer... so much more than a breakfast drink
>
> Since the Republicans define "mainstream" as Right Wing Fanatic they
> might as well start filibustering now and get it the hell over with.
Fair enough.
When the Constitution and Personal Responsibility are characterized
as
a right wing fanatical philosophy then in the words of the great GW,
"Bring it On!"
Thanks for playing.
Gunner Asch
<Chrish...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>Since the Republicans define "mainstream" as Right Wing Fanatic t
Since the Leftwing defines anyone to the Right of Liberal as Right Wing
Fanatic...we can pretty much ignore most of what the Leftwing Says.
ArmyOfDorkness
"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4o5ns55hkmn4n0hi7...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:54:01 -0700 (PDT), Christopher Helms
> <Chrish...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>Since the Republicans define "mainstream" as Right Wing Fanatic t
>
> Since the Leftwing defines anyone to the Right of Liberal as Right Wing
> Fanatic...we can pretty much ignore most of what the Leftwing Says.
>
> Gumby
Would you describe Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito as
mainstream?
Gunner Asch
<DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:4o5ns55hkmn4n0hi7...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:54:01 -0700 (PDT), Christopher Helms
>> <Chrish...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Since the Republicans define "mainstream" as Right Wing Fanatic t
>>
>> Since the Leftwing defines anyone to the Right of Liberal as Right Wing
>> Fanatic...we can pretty much ignore most of what the Leftwing Says.
>>
>> Gumby
>
>Would you describe Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito as
>mainstream?
Yes indeed.
You are aware that over 75% of the People are Conservative in one form
or another, are you not?
Do both men vote STricly conservative? No. But far closer than the
previous liberal fucktards that put them there.
Gunner
ArmyOfDorkness
"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:s2bns5t0n51g7pck0...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:16:48 -0500, "ArmyOfDorkness"
> <DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:4o5ns55hkmn4n0hi7...@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:54:01 -0700 (PDT), Christopher Helms
>>> <Chrish...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Since the Republicans define "mainstream" as Right Wing Fanatic t
>>>
>>> Since the Leftwing defines anyone to the Right of Liberal as Right Wing
>>> Fanatic...we can pretty much ignore most of what the Leftwing Says.
>>>
>>> Gumby
>>
>>Would you describe Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito as
>>mainstream?
>
> Yes indeed.
>
> You are aware that over 75% of the People are Conservative in one form
> or another, are you not?
>
> Do both men vote STricly conservative? No. But far closer than the
> previous liberal fucktards that put them there.
>
> Gumby
You never disappoint.
Lookout
wrote:
>On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:54:01 -0700 (PDT), Christopher Helms
><Chrish...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>Since the Republicans define "mainstream" as Right Wing Fanatic t
>
>Since the Leftwing defines anyone to the Right of Liberal as Right Wing
>Fanatic...we can pretty much ignore most of what the Leftwing Says.
>
>Gunner
The republicans have no say in the matter.
Lookout
wrote:
>On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:16:48 -0500, "ArmyOfDorkness"
><DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:4o5ns55hkmn4n0hi7...@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:54:01 -0700 (PDT), Christopher Helms
>>> <Chrish...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Since the Republicans define "mainstream" as Right Wing Fanatic t
>>>
>>> Since the Leftwing defines anyone to the Right of Liberal as Right Wing
>>> Fanatic...we can pretty much ignore most of what the Leftwing Says.
>>>
>>> Gumby
>>
>>Would you describe Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito as
>>mainstream?
>
>Yes indeed.
>
>You are aware that over 75% of the People are Conservative in one form
>or another, are you not?
Prove it.
Mort Davis
"Christopher Helms" <Chrish...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:90d884d1-f3a4-4405...@s9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 11, 12:11 pm, Major Debacle <major_deba...@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
> In other words, they want a white conservative male
> ___________
>
> WASHINGTON — GOP senators who will help shape the review of President
> Barack Obama's next nominee to the Supreme Court said Sunday he must
> pick someone with "mainstream" judicial views to avoid a potential
> filibuster.
>
> more...http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jp9jrwkjig6vQnONc-Z...
> --
> Beer... so much more than a breakfast drink
Since the Republicans define "mainstream" as Right Wing Fanatic
============
Wrong, fucktard. They believe a Justice should follow the CONSTITUTIPON.
Ignorant morons like yo think they should decide cases based upon emotional
drivel.
Gunner Asch
<DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:s2bns5t0n51g7pck0...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:16:48 -0500, "ArmyOfDorkness"
>> <DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:4o5ns55hkmn4n0hi7...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:54:01 -0700 (PDT), Christopher Helms
>>>> <Chrish...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Since the Republicans define "mainstream" as Right Wing Fanatic t
>>>>
>>>> Since the Leftwing defines anyone to the Right of Liberal as Right Wing
>>>> Fanatic...we can pretty much ignore most of what the Leftwing Says.
>>>>
>>>> Gumby
>>>
>>>Would you describe Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito as
>>>mainstream?
>>
>> Yes indeed.
>>
>> You are aware that over 75% of the People are Conservative in one form
>> or another, are you not?
>>
>> Do both men vote STricly conservative? No. But far closer than the
>> previous liberal fucktards that put them there.
>>
>> Gunner
>
>You never disappoint.
Lol...neither do you.
Laugh laugh laugh.
I wonder a bit how you will be killed. Not losing any sleep over it of
course..but am pondering on it.
Anyone want to start a pool?
Gunner
ArmyOfDorkness
"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:qvhns5dr6cpvplbln...@4ax.com...
In my very old age I'll have a heart attack screwing a hot blonde chick.
Maybe two.
>
> Anyone want to start a pool?
I already have a pool. That's where I swim after screwing hot blonde chicks.
>
> Gumby
Let's guess how you'll die. Alone, in your tattered LazyBoy recliner, in
front of the TV. Fox News will play for days. The mailman will finally
realize something is up because of the smell, which is worse than normal,
and because you haven't waddled to the door of your trailer to bring in your
copies of Guns & Ammo and Newsmax magazines. No one else noticed you missing
since you have no friends or relatives that will speak to you. The cops
finally force their way in through the filth of empty beer cans and pork
rind bags. They find you with your face half eaten by your cat. You're
hauled away to a paupers grave. No one shows for the service. No one cares.
Gunner Asch
<DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Chick? Your gay. Hot blond boys maybe.
>
>>
>> Anyone want to start a pool?
>
>I already have a pool. That's where I swim after screwing hot blonde chicks.
You mean you cant chase the little boys anymore? Pity.
>
>>
>> Gumby
>
>Let's guess how you'll die. Alone, in your tattered LazyBoy recliner, in
>front of the TV. Fox News will play for days. The mailman will finally
>realize something is up because of the smell, which is worse than normal,
>and because you haven't waddled to the door of your trailer to bring in your
>copies of Guns & Ammo and Newsmax magazines. No one else noticed you missing
>since you have no friends or relatives that will speak to you. The cops
>finally force their way in through the filth of empty beer cans and pork
>rind bags. They find you with your face half eaten by your cat. You're
>hauled away to a paupers grave. No one shows for the service. No one cares.
>
>
1. I seldom watch TV
2. I dont have a recliner
3. I spend most of time in my shop and in the field. In fact..Im
posting from the laptop in my shop while waiting for paint to dry on a
welder that Ive sold.
4. I dont read Newsmax or Guns and Ammo. No time.
5. I have friends that pop in several times a day. In fact..all too
often as when they come over..I cant finish whatever Im doing
6. The dogs will probably keep the cats from eating me..but if they
dont..so be it.
7. Ill have a nice veterans funeral, with 21 gun salute. You will die
as a result of gun fire. And be fed to hogs.
That first part.."lets guess"..is all you are good for. Dumb as a bag of
hammers and about as smart as pond scum.
Laugh laugh laugh!
http://picasaweb.google.com/gunnerasch
Lookout
<DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
HAHAHAHAA
That's pretty much what I predicted months ago for gummie. It is a
coincident that two unrelated individuals both were able to come to
the same conclusion, gummie? We've seen that news story time and time
again and YOU are the perfect candidate for the same ending.
Coincident? Nah...you're as easy to predict in death as you are in
life.
wmbjk...@citlink.net
wrote:
>3. I spend most of time in my shop and in the field. In fact..Im
>posting from the laptop in my shop while waiting for paint to dry on a
>welder that Ive sold.
WTF? As everyone can plainly see, you spend most of your time on
Usenet. More than a hundred posts per day, 2300 so far this month
http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=Orot9hQAAAAVu-i7YM79BqNIPO5iBPiLOPANdqfI6prRsqjc7uCt1A
That's a lot of paint drying, lardass.
>4. I dont read Newsmax or Guns and Ammo. No time.
LOL When you're not here spinning yarns, you're reading right wing
nutblogs for fresh material. If you were so busy working, then why
would you have posted this a week ago: "Gunner, whose total liquid
assests at the moment..is $80"
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.crafts.metalworking/msg/b01a03181ff103e4
>5. I have friends that pop in several times a day. In fact..all too
>often as when they come over..I cant finish whatever Im doing
So these friends' pestering has been keeping you broke for nearly 30
years?
http://tinyurl.com/pf22ny
Where were these friends when you claimed to have no choice but to
drive yourself home from your last >$200k bout of leeching?
>6. The dogs will probably keep the cats from eating me..but if they
>dont..so be it.
And the dogs will be eating what... the cats?
>7. Ill have a nice veterans funeral, with 21 gun salute.
OMG! You've been BSing for years about serving under someone else's
name in order to explain why you don't qualify for VA benefits. But
suddenly they're going to realize they owe you a veteran's funeral?
Now you expect us to believe what... that your headstone will have
somebody else's name on it? Considering your history of whoppers, you
should be buried under the golden arches.
Wayne
Gunner Asch
>>
>>Since the Leftwing defines anyone to the Right of Liberal
>
>Well, there ya go
>
>Liberal is mainstream--nothing fanatical about it
Liberal is far to the Left of center. You know it..or should..and damned
sure everyone else knows it.
Oh..your nym change was noted.
again
<plink>
Gunner Asch
>On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:38:01 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>You mean you cant chase the little boys anymore? Pity.
>
>From the looks of this----you can't either, CUnter
nym change again noted.
<plink>
Lookout
wrote:
>On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:18:49 -0600, b...@Bush.com wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:38:01 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>You mean you cant chase the little boys anymore? Pity.
>>
>>From the looks of this----you can't either, CUnter
>
>nym change again noted.
>
><plink>
>
>Gunner
When gummie gets nailed he runs. Happens every time. He's your typical
conservative. Chicken to the core.
Gunner Asch
>On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:36:28 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>Liberal is mainstream--nothing fanatical about it
>>
>>
>>Liberal is far to the Left of center. You know it..or should..and damned
>>sure everyone else knows it.
>
>SNicker
>
>You "saying so" only makes you look more stupid than I've proven you
>are.
Another nym change?
You are a busy little boy, arnt you?
<plink>
Lots of room in the Bozo bin..lots!
Laugh laugh laugh
John Q Public
Gee and all the justices blocked by the left for political pr don't count.
Since Kennedy and the dems started this lets jump on the bandwagon and do it
to them, hell, we represent the mainstream anyway not the left!
Shall not be infringed
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 13:18:49 -0600, b...@Bush.com wrote:
> >wrote:
>
> >>You mean you cant chase the little boys anymore? Pity.
>
> >From the looks of this----you can't either, CUnter
>
> nym change again noted.
>
> <plink>
>
> Gunner
Where is Cur-Lee's complaints during all this nym-shifting???
Albert Cur-Lee Mitchell doesn't mind being anonymous, but don't dare
anyone else try it.
Gunner Asch
>On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:31:31 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>You "saying so" only makes you look more stupid than I've proven you
>>>are.
>>
>>Another nym change?
>>
>>You are a busy little boy, arnt you?
>
>Still a junkyard operater?
>
>SNICKER
<VBG>
<plink>
Lots of room..lots of room indeed!
Laugh laugh laugh!
ArmyOfDorkness
<Bi...@Bob.net> wrote in message
news:h3tps59ehi6mlqulf...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:31:31 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>>You "saying so" only makes you look more stupid than I've proven you
>>>are.
>>
>>Another nym change?
>>
>>You are a busy little boy, arnt you?
>
> Still a junkyard operater?
>
> SNICKER
He calls it a homestead now
pyotr filipivich
<gunne...@gmail.com> reported Elvis on Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:38:01
-0700 in misc.survivalism:
>On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 22:50:13 -0500, "ArmyOfDorkness"
><DorkAs...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>In my very old age I'll have a heart attack screwing a hot blonde chick.
>>Maybe two.
>
>Chick? Your gay. Hot blond boys maybe.
>>
>>>
>>> Anyone want to start a pool?
>>
>>I already have a pool. That's where I swim after screwing hot blonde chicks.
>
>You mean you cant chase the little boys anymore? Pity
Dorkness means the little yellow chicks - the ones that go
"peep-peep!" He's been into animal husbandry for quite some time,
and has not been caught yet.
-
pyotr filipivich.
Just about the time you finally see light at the end of the tunnel,
you find out it's a Government Project to build more tunnel.
cop welfare
ran up the flagpole to see if anyone would salute.
lessee, now...
they want a ''mainstream'' supreme court nominee?
well, you can't ask for too much...
why not a nice 'consoivative' type along the lines of this guy?
hell, he died of aids, too.
don't git any more mainstream than that in the 'consoivative'
movement.
Gunner Asch
>On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:58:40 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Lots of room..lots of room indeed!
>
>I hear doctors can close them gaping assholes with an operation,
>Cunter.
<plink>
VBG
cop welfare
che...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 18, 3:54 pm, Christopher Helms <Chrishelms...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 11, 12:11 pm, Major Debacle <major_deba...@invalid.invalid>
> > wrote:
>
> > > In other words, they want a white conservative male
> > > ___________
>
> > > WASHINGTON — GOP senators who will help shape the review of President
> > > Barack Obama's next nominee to the Supreme Court said Sunday he must
> > > pick someone with "mainstream" judicial views to avoid a potential
> > > filibuster.
>
> > > more...http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jp9jrwkjig6vQnONc-Z...
> > > --
> > > Beer... so much more than a breakfast drink
>
> > might as well start filibustering now and get it the hell over with.
>
> Fair enough.
>
> When the Constitution and Personal Responsibility are characterized
> as
> a right wing fanatical philosophy then in the words of the great GW,
> "Bring it On!"
>
> Thanks for playing.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
say, thas pretty funny.
the constitution is supported by no-one these days,
or at the most given lip-service.
the only things most ppl think about are guns and taxes which is a
good start but kind of indicates a certain egotismic, orgasmic
selfishness and shortsighted contempt for others.
personal rsponsibility is also an illusion if you insist on getting
fat and stupid at the expense of society as a whole and continue to
spout limbaughisms when it comes to environmental and other problems.
Lookout
Wrong. Jobs is #1 but 2 & 3 you might be right.