Being Kind to Ahmedinejad and his Intended Nuclear Holocaust in the Middle East - (Quotes {HRI 20061105-V2.2})
Koos Nolst Trenite
Middle East
11 November 2006
(Suitable for foreign
language students)
'
[Quote from {HRI 20061105-V2.2}*]
This example is really not hard to understand,
so now you know whom Vladimir Putin and Hu
Jintao are protecting and nurturing.
And the question is, whether any of
the "suicide soldiers" of Ahmedinejad
himself, will finally turn upon him, to
inflict upon him, upon Ahmedinejad, the
kindness and relief of ending at least
his physical acts
with which he, the intended
victim, Ahmedinejad, executes
the compulsion of very intense
evil as his Hate and Contempt
for people dictates, and
by which HE INTENDS TO UNLEASH A NUCLEAR
AND GLOBAL HOLOCAUST,
which he ENJOYS - like Nero
who ENJOYS to see his city,
Rome, going up in flames.
'
'
[The Context of the Quote:*]
Now you may understand, why Ahmedinejad wants
the Jewish state of Israel destroyed and all
its people removed:
He wants the witnesses destroyed (again), of
the extermination of people he was engaged in
in his preceding life time, his past life, not
to mention earlier lives.
Criminal Minds ARE Criminal Minds,
destroyed souls, and they do not change
and can not be repaired, regrettably,
and despite all the extremely destructive
claims and fairy tales you and I have
been convinced of to the contrary.
*(32)(24)
'
This example is really not hard to understand,
so now you know whom Vladimir Putin and Hu
Jintao are protecting and nurturing.
And the question is, whether any of
the "suicide soldiers" of Ahmedinejad
himself, will finally turn upon him, to
inflict upon him, upon Ahmedinejad, the
kindness and relief of ending at least
his physical acts
with which he, the intended
victim, Ahmedinejad, executes
the compulsion of very intense
evil as his Hate and Contempt
for people dictates, and
by which HE INTENDS TO UNLEASH A NUCLEAR
AND GLOBAL HOLOCAUST,
which he ENJOYS - like Nero
who ENJOYS to see his city,
Rome, going up in flames.
'
Such is the nature of Criminal
Minds, and that is what is intended
by him and by those in power in
China and Russia, the death they
WANT for your future,
such is their Hate and
Contempt for Mankind,
which of course they have to
hide and misrepresent, being
Criminal Minds, in order to
make you NOT ACT
to NOT remove Criminal Minds from
a position of government, to NOT
remove him in whatever way is
required for it, which is
in accordance with the First
International Law. *(30)
Criminal Minds do NOT have
the right to vote, obviously,
as it is their intention, to
secretly DESTROY the group -
which I have explained to you
elsewhere in detail about
the "Security Council."
[End Quotes]
'
Koos Nolst Trenite 'Cause Trinity'
human rights philosopher and poet
'Men of all nations came
to listen to Solomon's wisdom,
sent by all the kings of the world,
who had heard of his wisdom.'
1 Kings 4:34
________
Footnote:
(*) 'Christians and Muslims and Jews, who DENY past lives, drive
people into Buddhism and Hinduism and its various modern cults'
{HRI 20061105-V2.2}
(5 November 2006 - Version 2.2 on 9 Nov 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.org.un/msg/4903ba9ed76f65c8?fwc=1
____________
Verification:
http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld
Copyright 2006 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
and poet
This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
anyone who learns from it and (even if he can not learn from it)
who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included,
to others who might be able to learn from it.
None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
or religious or scientific agenda, but only to educate, and to
encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves,
about any organizations or individuals.
Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
PlatoWorld at Lycos.com
(address unreadable for Internet robots
- replace ' at ' with the '@' symbol)
Venceremos
Summary
For many years now, American presidents of both parties have been
staunchly committed to Israel and its security. This entrenched policy
is an expression of the Jewish-Zionist grip on America's political and
cultural life. It was fervent support for Israel - shared by
President Bush, high-ranking administration officials and nearly the
entire US Congress - that proved crucial in the decision to invade
and subdue one of Israel 's greatest regional enemies.
While the unprovoked US invasion of Iraq may have helped Israel, just
as those who wanted and planned for the war had hoped, it has been a
calamity for America and the world. It has cost tens of thousands of
lives and many tens of billions of dollars. Around the world, it has
generated unmatched distrust and hostility toward the US. In Arab and
Muslim countries, it has fueled intense hatred of the United States,
and has brought many new recruits to the ranks of anti-American
terrorists.
Americans have already paid a high price for their nation's com-mitment
to Israel . We will pay an ever higher price - not just in dollars or
international prestige, but in the lives of young men squandered for
the interests of a foreign state - until the Jew ish-Zionist hold on
US political life is finally broken.
(19406 bytes) [c] Print
http://www.rense.com/general74/warfor.htm
By Mark Weber
Institute for Historical Review
11-10-6
The United States invasion of Iraq in March-April 2003, and the
occupation of the country since then, has cost more than three thou
sand American lives and many tens of billions of dollars, and has
brought death to tens of thousands of Iraqis.
Why did President Bush decide to go to war? In whose interests was it
launched?
In the months leading up to the attack, President Bush and other
high-ranking US officials repeatedly warned that the threat posed to
the US and world by the Baghdad regime was so grave and imminent that
the United States had to act quickly to bomb, invade and occupy Iraq.
On Sept. 28, 2002, for example, he said:
"The danger to our country is grave and it is growing. The Iraqi regime
possesses biological and chemical weapons, is rebuilding the facilities
to make more and, according to the British government, could launch a
biological or chemical attack in as little as 45 minutes after the
order is given... This regime is seeking a nu clear bomb, and with
fissile material could build one within a year."
On March 6, 2003, President Bush declared:
"Saddam Hussein and his weapons are a direct threat to this coun-try,
to our people, and to all free people... I believe Saddam Hus sein is a
threat to the American people. I believe he's a threat to the
neighborhood in which he lives. And I've got good evidence to believe
that. He has weapons of mass destruction... The American people know
that Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction."
These claims were untrue. As the world now knows, Iraq had no
dan-gerous "weapons of mass destruction," and posed no threat to the US
. Moreover, alarmist suggestions that the Baghdad regime was working
with the al-Qaeda terror network likewise proved to be without
foundation.
So if the official reasons given for the war were untrue, why did the
United States attack Iraq?
Whatever the secondary reasons for the war, the crucial factor in
President Bush's decision to attack was to help Israel. With sup-port
from Israel and America's Jewish-Zionist lobby, and prodded by Jewish
"neo-conservatives" holding high-level positions in his administration,
President Bush - who was already fervently com-mitted to Israel -
resolved to invade and subdue one of Israel's chief regional enemies.
This is so widely understood in Washington that US Senator Ernest
Hollings was moved in May 2004 to acknowledge that the US invaded Iraq
"to secure Israel ," and "everybody" knows it. He also identi fied
three of the influential pro-Israel Jews in Washington who played an
important role in prodding the US into war: Richard Perle, chair of the
Pentagon's Defense Policy Board; Paul Wolfowitz, Deputy Defense
Secretary; and Charles Krauthammer, columnist and author. / 1
Hollings referred to the cowardly reluctance of his Congressional
colleagues to acknowledge this truth openly, saying that "nobody is
willing to stand up and say what is going on." Due to "the pres-sures
we get politically," he added, members of Congress uncriti-cally
support Israel and its policies.
Some months before the invasion, retired four-star US Army General and
former NATO Supreme Allied Commander Wesley Clark acknowledged in an
interview: "Those who favor this attack by the US against Iraq now will
tell you candidly, and privately, that it is probably true that Saddam
Hussein is no threat to the United States. But they are afraid at some
point he might decide if he had a nuclear weapon to use it against
Israel ." / 2
Six months before the attack, President Bush met in the White House
with eleven members of the US House of Representatives. While the "war
against terrorism is going okay," he told the lawmakers, the United
States would soon have to deal with a greater danger: "The biggest
threat, however, is Saddam Hussein and his weapons of mass destruction.
He can blow up Israel and that would trigger an international
conflict." / 3
Bush also spoke candidly about why the US was going to war during a
White House meeting on Feb. 27, 2003, just three weeks before the
invasion. In a talk with Elie Wiesel, the well-known Jewish writer,
Bush said: "If we don't disarm Saddam Hussein, he will put a weapon of
mass destruction on Israel and they will do what they think they have
to do, and we have to avoid that." / 4
Fervently Pro-Israel
President Bush's fervent support for Israel and its hardline government
is well known. He reaffirmed it, for example, in June 2002 in a major
speech on the Middle East . In the view of "leading Israeli
commentators," the London Times reported, the address was "so
pro-Israel that it might have been written by Ariel Sharon." / 5
This outlook was echoed by Condoleeza Rice, who served as President
Bush's National Security Advisor, and later, as Secretary of State. In
a May 2003 interview she said that the "security of Israel is the key
to security of the world." / 6
In an address to pro-Israel activists at the 2004 convention of the
American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), Bush said: "The
United States is strongly committed, and I am strongly committed, to
the security of Israel as a vibrant Jewish state." He also told the
gathering: "By defending the freedom and prosperity and secu rity of
Israel , you're also serving the cause of America ." / 7
Long Range Plans
Jewish-Zionist plans for war against Iraq had been in place for years.
In mid-1996, a policy paper prepared for then-Israeli Prime Minis ter
Benjamin Netanyahu outlined a grand strategy for Israel in the Middle
East. Entitled "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,"
it was written under the auspices of an Israeli think tank, the
Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies. Specifically,
it called for an "effort that can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from
power in Iraq , an important Israeli strategic objective in its own
right..." / 8
The authors of "A Clean Break" included Richard Perle, Douglas Feith,
and David Wurmser, three influential Jews who later held high-level
positions in the Bush administration, 2001-2004: Perle as chair of the
Defense Policy Board, Feith as Undersecretary of De-fense, and Wurmser
as special assistant to the Undersecretary of State for Arms Control.
The role played by Bush administration officials who are associated
with two major pro-Zionist "neoconservative" research centers has come
under scrutiny from The Nation, the influential public affairs weekly.
/ 9
The author, Jason Vest, examined the close links between the Jewish
Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA) and the Center for
Security Policy (CSP), detailing the ties between these groups and
various politicians, arms merchants, military men, wealthy pro-Is rael
American Jews, and Republican presidential administrations
JINSA and CSP members, notes Vest, "have ascended to powerful
gov-ernment posts, where... they've managed to weave a number of issues
- support for national missile defense, opposition to arms control
treaties, championing of wasteful weapons systems, arms aid to Tur key
and American unilateralism in general - into a hard line, with support
for the Israeli right at its core... On no issue is the JINSA/CSP hard
line more evident than in its relentless campaign for war - not just
with Iraq , but 'total war,' as Michael Ledeen, one of the most
influential JINSAns in Washington , put it... For this crew, 'regime
change' by any means necessary in Iraq , Iran , Syria , Saudi Arabia
and the Palestinian Authority is an urgent im-perative."
Samuel Francis, author, editor and columnist, also looked into the
"neo-conservative" role in fomenting war. / 10
"My own answer," he wrote, "is that the lie that a massively-armed Iraq
posed a grave and imminent threat to the US was fabricated by
neo-conservatives in the administration whose first loyalty is to
Israel and its interests and who wanted the United States to smash Iraq
because it was the biggest potential threat to Israel in the region.
They are known to have been pushing for war with Iraq since at least
1996, but they could not make an effective case for it until after
Sept. 11, 2001..."
In the aftermath of the 2001 Nine-Eleven terror attacks, ardently
pro-Zionist "neo-conservatives" in the Bush administration - who for
years had sought a Middle East war to bolster Israel's security in the
region - exploited the tragedy to press their agenda. In this they
were backed by the Israeli government, which also pres-sured the White
House to strike Iraq .
"The Israeli military and political leadership yearns for war in Iraq,"
reported a leading Israeli daily paper, Haaretz, in February 2002. / 11
The Jerusalem correspondent for the Guardian, the respected British
daily, reported in August 2002: " Israel signalled its decision yes
terday to put public pressure on President George Bush to go ahead with
a military attack on Iraq , even though it believes Saddam Hus sein may
well retaliate by striking Israel ." / 12
Three months before the US invasion, the well-informed Washington
journalist Robert Novak reported that Israeli prime minister Sharon was
telling American political leaders that "the greatest US as-sistance to
Israel would be to overthrow Saddam Hussein's Iraqi regime." Moreover,
added Novak, "that view is widely shared inside the Bush
administration, and is a major reason why US forces today are
assembling for war." / 13
Israel 's spy agencies were a "full partner" with the US and Britain in
producing greatly exaggerated prewar assessments of Iraq 's abil ity to
wage war, a former senior Israeli military intelligence of ficial has
acknowledged. Shlomo Bron, a brigadier general in the Israel army
reserves, and a senior researcher at a major Israeli think tank, said
that intelligence provided by Israel played a sig-nificant role in
supporting the US and British case for making war. Israeli intelligence
agencies, he said, "badly overestimated the Iraqi threat to Israel and
reinforced the American and British be lief that the weapons of mass
destruction existed." / 14
The role of the pro-Israel lobby in pressing for war is examined in an
81-page research paper by two prominent American scholars, John J.
Mearsheimer, professor of political science at the University of
Chicago, and Stephen M. Walt, professor of international affairs at the
Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University . / 15
In the paper, "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy," they write:
"Pressure from Israel and the pro-Israel Lobby was not the only factor
behind the decision to attack Iraq in March 2003, but it was critical.
Some Americans believe that this was a war for oil, but there is hardly
any direct evidence to support this claim. Instead, the war was
motivated in good part by a desire to make Israel more secure Within
the United States, the main driving force behind the Iraq war was a
small band of neoconservatives, many with close ties to Israel 's Likud
Party. In addition, key leaders of the Lobby's major organizations lent
their voices to the campaign for war."
Important members of the pro-Israel lobby carried out what professors
Mearshiemer and Walt call "an unrelenting public relations campaign to
win support for invading Iraq . A key part of this campaign was the
manipulation of intelligence information, so as to make Saddam look
like an imminent threat."
For some Jewish leaders, the Iraq war is part of a long-range effort to
install Israel-friendly regimes across the Middle East. Norman
Podhoretz, a prominent Jewish writer and an ardent supporter of Israel,
has been for years editor of Commentary, the influential Zionist
monthly. In the Sept. 2002 issue he wrote:
"The regimes that richly deserve to be overthrown and replaced are not
confined to the three singled-out members of the axis of evil Iraq ,
Iran , North Korea . At a minimum, the axis should extend to Syria and
Lebanon and Libya, as well as 'friends' of America like the Saudi royal
family and Egypt 's Hosni Mubarak, along with the Palestinian
Authority, whether headed by Arafat or one of his henchmen."
Patrick J. Buchanan, the well-known writer and commentator, and former
White House Communications director, has been blunt in iden-tifying
those who pushed for war: / 16
"We charge that a cabal of polemicists and public officials seek to
ensnare our country in a series of wars that are not in America's
interests. We charge them with colluding with Israel to ignite those
wars and destroy the Oslo Accords. We charge them with de-liberately
damaging US relations with every state in the Arab world that defies
Israel or supports the Palestinian people's right to a homeland of
their own. We charge that they have alienated friends and allies all
over the Islamic and Western world through their arrogance, hubris, and
bellicosity...
"Cui Bono? For whose benefit these endless wars in a region that holds
nothing vital to America save oil, which the Arabs must sell us to
survive? Who would benefit from a war of civilizations be tween the
West and Islam?
"Answer: one nation, one leader, one party. Israel, Sharon, Likud."
Uri Avnery - an award-winning Israeli journalist and author, and a
three-time member of Israel 's parliament - sees the Iraq war as an
expression of immense Jewish influence and power. In an essay written
some weeks after the US invasion, he wrote: / 17
"Who are the winners? They are the so-called neo-cons, or
neo-conservatives. A compact group, almost all of whose members are
Jewish. They hold the key positions in the Bush administration, as well
as in the think-tanks that play an important role in formu-lating
American policy and the ed-op pages of the influential news-papers...
The immense influence of this largely Jewish group stems from its close
alliance with the extreme right-wing Christian fun-damentalists, who
nowadays control Bush's Republican party. ... Seemingly, all this is
good for Israel. America controls the world, we control America. Never
before have Jews exerted such an immense influence on the center of
world power."
In Britain, a veteran member of Britain's House of Commons bluntly
declared in May 2003 that Jews had taken control of America 's for eign
policy, and had succeeded in pushing the US into war. "A Jewish cabal
have taken over the government in the United States and formed an
unholy alliance with fundamentalist Christians," said Tam Dalyell, a
Labour party deputy and the longest-serving House mem ber. "There is
far too much Jewish influence in the United States," he added. / 18
Summary
For many years now, American presidents of both parties have been
staunchly committed to Israel and its security. This entrenched policy
is an expression of the Jewish-Zionist grip on America's political and
cultural life. It was fervent support for Israel - shared by
President Bush, high-ranking administration officials and nearly the
entire US Congress - that proved crucial in the decision to invade
and subdue one of Israel 's greatest regional enemies.
While the unprovoked US invasion of Iraq may have helped Israel, just
as those who wanted and planned for the war had hoped, it has been a
calamity for America and the world. It has cost tens of thousands of
lives and many tens of billions of dollars. Around the world, it has
generated unmatched distrust and hostility toward the US. In Arab and
Muslim countries, it has fueled intense hatred of the United States,
and has brought many new recruits to the ranks of anti-American
terrorists.
Americans have already paid a high price for their nation's com-mitment
to Israel . We will pay an ever higher price - not just in dollars or
international prestige, but in the lives of young men squandered for
the interests of a foreign state - until the Jew ish-Zionist hold on
US political life is finally broken.
Notes
1 Remarks by Ernest F. Hollings, May 20, 2004. Congressional Record -
Senate, May 20, 2004, pages S5921-S5925.
2 The Guardian (London), August 20, 2002.
3 Bob Woodward, Plan of Attack (Simon & Schuster, 2004), p. 186. See
also p. 188
4 Bob Woodward, Plan of Attack (Simon & Schuster, 2004), p. 320.
5 R. Dunn, "Sharon Could Have Written Speech," The Times (London), June
26, 2002.
6 A. S. Lewin, "Israel's Security is Key to Security of Rest of World,"
Jewish Press (Brooklyn, NY), May 14, 2003. Rice's interview with the
Israeli daily Yediot Aharnonot is quoted.
7 Bush address to AIPAC convention, Washington, DC, May 18, 2004.
8 Text posted at http://www.israeleconomy.org/strat1.htm See also: J.
Bamford, A Pretext for War (Doubleday, 2004), pages 261-269; B.
Whitaker, "Playing Skittles with Saddam," The Guardian ( Brit-ain ),
Sept. 3, 2002.
9 J. Vest, "The Men From JINSA and CSP," The Nation, Sept. 2, 2002
(http://www.thenation.com/doc/20020902/vest).
10 S. Francis, "Weapons of Mass Deception: Somebody Lied," column of
Feb. 6, 2004 (http://www.vdare.com/francis/wmd.htm).
11 A. Benn, "Background: Enthusiastic IDF Awaits War in Iraq ,"
Haaretz, Feb. 17, 2002. Quoted in J. J. Mearsheimer, Stephen M. Walt,
"The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy," March 2006, p. 30, and p.
68, fn. 146. .
12 Jonathan Steele, " Israel Puts Pressure on US to Strike Iraq ," The
Guardian ( London ), August 17, 2002.
13 Robert Novak, " Sharon 's War?," column of Dec. 26, 2002.
(http://www.townhall.com/columnists/robertnovak/rn20021226.shtml).
14 L. King, "Ex-General Says Israel Inflated Iraqi Threat," Los Angeles
Times, Dec. 5, 2003.; See also: J. J. Mearsheimer, Stephen M. Walt,
"The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy," March 2006, p. 29, and p.
67, fn. 142.
15 John J. Mearsheimer, Stephen M. Walt, "The Israel Lobby and U.S.
Foreign Policy," March 2006, pages 29, 30,
32.(http://ksgnotes1.harvard.edu/Research/wpaper.nsf/rwp/RWP06-011/$File/rwp_06_011_walt.pdf).
A shorter version appeared in the London Review of Books, March 23,
2006. (http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/mear01_.html).
16 P. J. Buchanan, "Whose War?," The American Conservative, March 24,
2003. (http://www.amconmag.com/03_24_03/cover.html).
17 Uri Avnery, "The Night After," CounterPunch, April 10, 2003
(http://www.counterpunch.org/avnery04102003.html).
18 F. Nelson, "Anger Over Dalyell's 'Jewish Cabal' Slur," The Scotsman
(Edinburgh), May 5, 2003; M. White, "Dalyell Steps Up Attack On Levy,"
The Guardian (London), May 6, 2003.
1. 2018 03/2006 (revised)
Leonardo Been
ancient Arabic culture patterns and customs,
IN ORDER TO TRY AND TERRORIZE PEOPLE, by any means of lies and
intimidation,
are just like any other fully Criminal Mind, very well described in
'Criminal Minds ENJOY LYING, And THEY Know They Intentionally Lie'
{HRI 20050527-V3.5.2}
(27 May 2005 - Version 3.5.2 on 16 Jul 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.misc/msg/c8b4f54782dc87e8?fwc=1
and in
'Standard Behavior Of Criminal Minds'
{HRI 20030509-V4.2.1}
(9 May 2003 - Version 4.2.1 on 30 Sept 2006)
http://groups.google.com/group/human-rights-issues/msg/1de918df6abdd38c?fcw=1
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.org.un/msg/e18a87e4f1dd0c1f?fcw=1
'
A "responding," very severely Criminal Mind, a very active terrorist,
posting by the name of
'Vinceremos'or 'El Conquistador' from ser...@bellsouth.net
since May 2005,
with a TREMENDOUS amount of foreceful Hate for and atrocious lies
about people
- and whom most readers, I assume, will have blocked from
their newsreaders - anyhow, he
is described indeed, by the above Human Rights Issues.
'
'
One of these very severely Criminal Minds, posting now as 'Vinceremos'
from ser...@bellsouth.net
of course tremendously Hated and Hates, and worked hard to destroy
any truth and care for people, as was now posted by