Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Drudge Report Going Tabloid?
7 views
Skip to first unread message
Tracey12
Apr 12, 2012, 9:23:01 PM4/12/12
to
Matt Drudge seems to be taking the Drudge Report to new, uncharted
waters for his single page news aggregation site.
Not long ago, the Drudge Report featured almost daily article links to
homosexual issues. Apparently the complaints came in strong and it
appears now that Matt is shying away from those kinds of stories.
However, like TV and radio stations that ramp up the sexual content of
their reporting, Matt Drudge seems to be sexualizing his page to a far
greater extent than in the past.
For example, more of his links now display **Warning: Contains Graphic
Image**.
Shockingly, Matt has a link today that is very off color and very
unlike the old Drudge Report. The following link from Matt's page is
terrible and I do not suggest you allow any children to view what Matt
has decided to link, but to show you how things have changed at the
Drudge Report, I am going to provide this link from his page:
Group Slams HBO Show For 'Sexualizing Children'...
**Warning: Contains Graphic Image**
http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2012/04/angry-boys-right-wing-group-slams-hbo-sexualizing-children
Most of the time, Drudge reports on topical issues, particularly
political stories, but apparently in order to increase his site's
popularity, the amount of sex related stories seems to have increased
dramatically. As the old saying goes, "sex sells", and many times it
is used to attract a broader audience, but at a cost.
What do you think about the above story? Would you place a link to
that story on your page?
Drudge reportedly makes over $4 million dollars per year without the
sexualization of his page.
Why do you think he's turning tabloid?
All of the above is just my humble opinion.
waters for his single page news aggregation site.
Not long ago, the Drudge Report featured almost daily article links to
homosexual issues. Apparently the complaints came in strong and it
appears now that Matt is shying away from those kinds of stories.
However, like TV and radio stations that ramp up the sexual content of
their reporting, Matt Drudge seems to be sexualizing his page to a far
greater extent than in the past.
For example, more of his links now display **Warning: Contains Graphic
Image**.
Shockingly, Matt has a link today that is very off color and very
unlike the old Drudge Report. The following link from Matt's page is
terrible and I do not suggest you allow any children to view what Matt
has decided to link, but to show you how things have changed at the
Drudge Report, I am going to provide this link from his page:
Group Slams HBO Show For 'Sexualizing Children'...
**Warning: Contains Graphic Image**
http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2012/04/angry-boys-right-wing-group-slams-hbo-sexualizing-children
Most of the time, Drudge reports on topical issues, particularly
political stories, but apparently in order to increase his site's
popularity, the amount of sex related stories seems to have increased
dramatically. As the old saying goes, "sex sells", and many times it
is used to attract a broader audience, but at a cost.
What do you think about the above story? Would you place a link to
that story on your page?
Drudge reportedly makes over $4 million dollars per year without the
sexualization of his page.
Why do you think he's turning tabloid?
All of the above is just my humble opinion.
linuxgal
Apr 12, 2012, 10:38:28 PM4/12/12
to
Tracey12 wrote:
> Not long ago, the Drudge Report featured almost daily article links to
> homosexual issues. Apparently the complaints came in strong and it
> appears now that Matt is shying away from those kinds of stories.
>
Drudge himself is as queer as a football bat.
> Not long ago, the Drudge Report featured almost daily article links to
> homosexual issues. Apparently the complaints came in strong and it
> appears now that Matt is shying away from those kinds of stories.
>
Alan Ferris
Apr 13, 2012, 3:35:10 AM4/13/12
to
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:23:01 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
<tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>The following link from Matt's page is
>terrible and I do not suggest you allow any children to view what Matt
>has decided to link
You are not better than Drudge by repeating the link here. If he is
<tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>The following link from Matt's page is
>terrible and I do not suggest you allow any children to view what Matt
>has decided to link
wrong for using it, then so must you be.
--
Ferrit
()'.'.'()
( (T) )
( ) . ( )
(")_(")
Tracey12
Apr 13, 2012, 6:08:33 AM4/13/12
to
On Apr 13, 2:35 am, Alan Ferris <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:23:01 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:23:01 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>
> <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >The following link from Matt's page is
> >terrible and I do not suggest you allow any children to view what Matt
> >has decided to link
>
> You are not better than Drudge by repeating the link here. If he is
> wrong for using it, then so must you be.
>
> --
> Ferrit
>
> ()'.'.'()
> ( (T) )
> ( ) . ( )
> (")_(")
Why are you posting in US newsgroups? You're a foreigner sticking
> >The following link from Matt's page is
> >terrible and I do not suggest you allow any children to view what Matt
> >has decided to link
>
> You are not better than Drudge by repeating the link here. If he is
> wrong for using it, then so must you be.
>
> --
> Ferrit
>
> ()'.'.'()
> ( (T) )
> ( ) . ( )
> (")_(")
your nose in our affairs.
Alan Ferris
Apr 13, 2012, 7:42:55 AM4/13/12
to
crossposting then I would not have to see the crap you keep posting,
but I will miss the laughs.
lsrlts
Apr 13, 2012, 12:06:39 PM4/13/12
to
On 4/13/2012 4:42 AM, Alan Ferris wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 03:08:33 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
> <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Apr 13, 2:35 am, Alan Ferris<hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:23:01 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>>>
>>> <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> The following link from Matt's page is
>>>> terrible and I do not suggest you allow any children to view what Matt
>>>> has decided to link
>>>
>>> You are not better than Drudge by repeating the link here. If he is
>>> wrong for using it, then so must you be.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ferrit
>>>
>>> ()'.'.'()
>>> ( (T) )
>>> ( ) . ( )
>>> (")_(")
>>
>> Why are you posting in US newsgroups? You're a foreigner sticking
>> your nose in our affairs.
>
> What US newsgroup do you think I am posting to?
Which state is the city of Austin located in, you idiot Brit-troll?
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 03:08:33 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
> <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Apr 13, 2:35 am, Alan Ferris<hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:23:01 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>>>
>>> <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> The following link from Matt's page is
>>>> terrible and I do not suggest you allow any children to view what Matt
>>>> has decided to link
>>>
>>> You are not better than Drudge by repeating the link here. If he is
>>> wrong for using it, then so must you be.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ferrit
>>>
>>> ()'.'.'()
>>> ( (T) )
>>> ( ) . ( )
>>> (")_(")
>>
>> Why are you posting in US newsgroups? You're a foreigner sticking
>> your nose in our affairs.
>
> What US newsgroup do you think I am posting to?
> Maybe if you stopped crossposting
Soon.
lsrlts
Apr 13, 2012, 12:09:09 PM4/13/12
to
Alan Ferris
Apr 13, 2012, 12:36:29 PM4/13/12
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:06:39 -0700, lsrlts <dd...@gnail.invalid>
wrote:
You do realise that Tracey crossposts to:
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic,alt.politics,alt.religion.christian,austin.general
I am only signed up to one of those groups which is not Austin.
wrote:
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic,alt.politics,alt.religion.christian,austin.general
I am only signed up to one of those groups which is not Austin.
Alan Ferris
Apr 13, 2012, 12:36:56 PM4/13/12
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:09:09 -0700, lsrlts <dd...@gnail.invalid>
wrote:
Did you not realise that Tracey crossposted this to:
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic,alt.politics,alt.religion.christian,austin.general
wrote:
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic,alt.politics,alt.religion.christian,austin.general
Fred E Brown
Apr 13, 2012, 12:39:01 PM4/13/12
to
"Tracey12" <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:65272ea7-b345-4852...@v22g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
penises?
Drudge should not be bringing this to the attention of the public, right?
Pictures more innocent than that have been called child pornography.
Read the child porn statute, child porn is defined as "an actual minor
engaged in an explicit sexual act."
The picture is of a minor performing a sexual act.
The producers and parents of that child should be charged under the
child porn statutes.
Title 18 US Criminal Code, Chapter 110, sections 2251-2260
lsrlts
Apr 13, 2012, 12:51:05 PM4/13/12
to
lsrlts
Apr 13, 2012, 12:51:32 PM4/13/12
to
On 4/13/2012 9:36 AM, Alan Ferris wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:09:09 -0700, lsrlts<dd...@gnail.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> On 4/13/2012 3:08 AM, Tracey12 wrote:
>>> On Apr 13, 2:35 am, Alan Ferris<hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:23:01 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>>>>
>>>> <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> The following link from Matt's page is
>>>>> terrible and I do not suggest you allow any children to view what Matt
>>>>> has decided to link
>>>>
>>>> You are not better than Drudge by repeating the link here. If he is
>>>> wrong for using it, then so must you be.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ferrit
>>>>
>>>> ()'.'.'()
>>>> ( (T) )
>>>> ( ) . ( )
>>>> (")_(")
>>>
>>> Why are you posting in US newsgroups? You're a foreigner sticking
>>> your nose in our affairs.
>>
>> True.
>
> Did you not realise that Tracey crossposted
Is "Tracey" running your life, Brit-troll?
> wrote:
>
>> On 4/13/2012 3:08 AM, Tracey12 wrote:
>>> On Apr 13, 2:35 am, Alan Ferris<hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:23:01 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
>>>>
>>>> <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> The following link from Matt's page is
>>>>> terrible and I do not suggest you allow any children to view what Matt
>>>>> has decided to link
>>>>
>>>> You are not better than Drudge by repeating the link here. If he is
>>>> wrong for using it, then so must you be.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ferrit
>>>>
>>>> ()'.'.'()
>>>> ( (T) )
>>>> ( ) . ( )
>>>> (")_(")
>>>
>>> Why are you posting in US newsgroups? You're a foreigner sticking
>>> your nose in our affairs.
>>
>> True.
>
> Did you not realise that Tracey crossposted
Alan Ferris
Apr 13, 2012, 12:52:37 PM4/13/12
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:51:05 -0700, lsrlts <dd...@gnail.invalid>
I notice that with Americans, they will ignore and facts which get in
the way of their beliefs.
If you want me to go away stop crossposting
the way of their beliefs.
If you want me to go away stop crossposting
lsrlts
Apr 13, 2012, 12:53:47 PM4/13/12
to
Alan Ferris
Apr 13, 2012, 12:54:01 PM4/13/12
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:51:32 -0700, lsrlts <dd...@gnail.invalid>
Why do you get upset about the truth? Why is it you have to ignore
facts which get in the way of your beliefs?
facts which get in the way of your beliefs?
lsrlts
Apr 13, 2012, 12:55:37 PM4/13/12
to
Are you always such a puppet-troll?
Alan Ferris
Apr 13, 2012, 12:55:46 PM4/13/12
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:53:47 -0700, lsrlts <dd...@gnail.invalid>
So do you. What else do you think you are currently doing?
Me I am enjoying watching you continue something you want to stop.
No control, you are totally in my power :) Keep dancing.
Me I am enjoying watching you continue something you want to stop.
No control, you are totally in my power :) Keep dancing.
lsrlts
Apr 13, 2012, 12:56:35 PM4/13/12
to
Now leave.
Alan Ferris
Apr 13, 2012, 12:56:29 PM4/13/12
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:55:37 -0700, lsrlts <dd...@gnail.invalid>
I don't. But I notice you are giving me a lot of power and then
whining about it
whining about it
lsrlts
Apr 13, 2012, 12:57:30 PM4/13/12
to
Alan Ferris
Apr 13, 2012, 12:57:29 PM4/13/12
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:56:35 -0700, lsrlts <dd...@gnail.invalid>
>Now leave me alone PLEASE
correct your post
correct your post
Alan Ferris
Apr 13, 2012, 12:58:08 PM4/13/12
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:57:30 -0700, lsrlts <dd...@gnail.invalid>
>You make me look stupid.
I know
I know
lsrlts
Apr 13, 2012, 1:27:35 PM4/13/12
to
On 4/13/2012 9:57 AM, Alan Ferris wrote:
> correct your
life...
> correct your
life...
lsrlts
Apr 13, 2012, 1:28:11 PM4/13/12
to
On 4/13/2012 9:58 AM, Alan Ferris wrote:
> I make me look stupid.
>
...we know
> I make me look stupid.
>
...we know
Alan Ferris
Apr 13, 2012, 1:39:58 PM4/13/12
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:27:35 -0700, lsrlts <dd...@gnail.invalid>
wrote:
>On 4/13/2012 9:57 AM, Alan Ferris wrote:
>
>> correct my
>life...
Get one first
wrote:
>On 4/13/2012 9:57 AM, Alan Ferris wrote:
>
>life...
Get one first
Alan Ferris
Apr 13, 2012, 1:40:16 PM4/13/12
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:28:11 -0700, lsrlts <dd...@gnail.invalid>
wrote:
>On 4/13/2012 9:58 AM, Alan Ferris wrote:
>> I make you look stupid.
>>
>
>...we know
Good
wrote:
>On 4/13/2012 9:58 AM, Alan Ferris wrote:
>>
>
>...we know
Good
lsrlts
Apr 13, 2012, 1:42:03 PM4/13/12
to
On 4/13/2012 10:39 AM, Alan Ferris wrote:
>>> correct my
>> life...
>
> I need to Get one first
>>> correct my
>> life...
>
>
> --
> Ferrit
>
True enough.
lsrlts
Apr 13, 2012, 1:42:36 PM4/13/12
to
On 4/13/2012 10:40 AM, Alan Ferris wrote:
>>> I make me look stupid.
>>>
>>
>> ...we know
>
> Good
Bit of masochist you are.
>>> I make me look stupid.
>>>
>>
>> ...we know
>
> Good
Bit of masochist you are.
Alan Ferris
Apr 13, 2012, 1:45:08 PM4/13/12
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:42:03 -0700, lsrlts <dd...@gnail.invalid>
wrote:
>On 4/13/2012 10:39 AM, Alan Ferris wrote:
>>>> correct my
>>> life...
>>
> I need to Get one first
>
>
>True enough.
Yes true.
wrote:
>On 4/13/2012 10:39 AM, Alan Ferris wrote:
>>>> correct my
>>> life...
>>
> I need to Get one first
>
>
Yes true.
Alan Ferris
Apr 13, 2012, 1:45:29 PM4/13/12
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:42:36 -0700, lsrlts <dd...@gnail.invalid>
wrote:
No, I enjoy a laugh. Why are you suffering?
wrote:
Harold Burton
Apr 13, 2012, 1:51:11 PM4/13/12
to
Going?
snicker
snicker
lsrlts
Apr 13, 2012, 2:31:00 PM4/13/12
to
On 4/13/2012 10:45 AM, Alan Ferris wrote:
>> I need to correct my life...
>> I need to correct my life...
>> I need to Get one first
>>
>>
>> True enough.
>
> Yes true.
we know.
>>
>>
>> True enough.
>
> Yes true.
lsrlts
Apr 13, 2012, 2:31:10 PM4/13/12
to
On 4/13/2012 10:45 AM, Alan Ferris wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:42:36 -0700, lsrlts<dd...@gnail.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> On 4/13/2012 10:40 AM, Alan Ferris wrote:
>>
>>>>> I make me look stupid.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ...we know
>>>
>>> Good
>>
>> Bit of masochist you are.
>
> No,
Yes.
> wrote:
>
>> On 4/13/2012 10:40 AM, Alan Ferris wrote:
>>
>>>>> I make me look stupid.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ...we know
>>>
>>> Good
>>
>> Bit of masochist you are.
>
> No,
Alan Ferris
Apr 13, 2012, 4:54:58 PM4/13/12
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:31:00 -0700, lsrlts <dd...@gnail.invalid>
wrote:
>On 4/13/2012 10:45 AM, Alan Ferris wrote:
>
>we cry
Yup.
wrote:
>On 4/13/2012 10:45 AM, Alan Ferris wrote:
>
Yup.
Alan Ferris
Apr 13, 2012, 4:55:57 PM4/13/12
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 11:31:10 -0700, lsrlts <dd...@gnail.invalid>
Oh well.
wrote:
>On 4/13/2012 10:45 AM, Alan Ferris wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:42:36 -0700, lsrlts<dd...@gnail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>>
>> Bit of masochist you are.
>Yes.
>On 4/13/2012 10:45 AM, Alan Ferris wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 10:42:36 -0700, lsrlts<dd...@gnail.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>>
>> Bit of masochist you are.
Oh well.
Tracey12
Apr 13, 2012, 5:46:22 PM4/13/12
to
Paul Duca
Apr 13, 2012, 5:45:36 PM4/13/12
to
On Apr 13, 12:39 pm, "Fred E Brown" <fredebr...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> "Tracey12" <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:65272ea7-b345-4852...@v22g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > Matt Drudge seems to be taking the Drudge Report to new, uncharted
> > waters for his single page news aggregation site.
>
> > Not long ago, the Drudge Report featured almost daily article links to
> > homosexual issues. Apparently the complaints came in strong and it
> > appears now that Matt is shying away from those kinds of stories.
>
> > However, like TV and radio stations that ramp up the sexual content of
> > their reporting, Matt Drudge seems to be sexualizing his page to a far
> > greater extent than in the past.
>
> > For example, more of his links now display **Warning: Contains Graphic
> > Image**.
> > Shockingly, Matt has a link today that is very off color and very
> > unlike the old Drudge Report. The following link from Matt's page is
> > Drudge Report, I am going to provide this link from his page:
>
> > Group Slams HBO Show For 'Sexualizing Children'...
>
> > **Warning: Contains Graphic Image**
>
> >http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2012/04/angry-boys-right-wing-g...
>
> > Most of the time, Drudge reports on topical issues, particularly
> > political stories, but apparently in order to increase his site's
> > popularity, the amount of sex related stories seems to have increased
> > dramatically. As the old saying goes, "sex sells", and many times it
> > is used to attract a broader audience, but at a cost.
>
> > What do you think about the above story? Would you place a link to
> > that story on your page?
>
> > Drudge reportedly makes over $4 million dollars per year without the
> > sexualization of his page.
>
> > Why do you think he's turning tabloid?
>
> > All of the above is just my humble opinion.
>
> So you approve of TV shows depicting preteens sucking on plastic
> penises?
> Drudge should not be bringing this to the attention of the public, right?
> Pictures more innocent than that have been called child pornography.
> Read the child porn statute, child porn is defined as "an actual minor
> engaged in an explicit sexual act."
> The picture is of a minor performing a sexual act.
> The producers and parents of that child should be charged under the
> child porn statutes.
> Title 18 US Criminal Code, Chapter 110, sections 2251-2260
Tracey approves of preteens (female) sucking on HIS penis...just what
God requires 'em to do.
Paul
> "Tracey12" <tracey12em...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:65272ea7-b345-4852...@v22g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > Matt Drudge seems to be taking the Drudge Report to new, uncharted
> > waters for his single page news aggregation site.
>
> > Not long ago, the Drudge Report featured almost daily article links to
> > homosexual issues. Apparently the complaints came in strong and it
> > appears now that Matt is shying away from those kinds of stories.
>
> > However, like TV and radio stations that ramp up the sexual content of
> > their reporting, Matt Drudge seems to be sexualizing his page to a far
> > greater extent than in the past.
>
> > For example, more of his links now display **Warning: Contains Graphic
> > Image**.
> > Shockingly, Matt has a link today that is very off color and very
> > unlike the old Drudge Report. The following link from Matt's page is
> > terrible and I do not suggest you allow any children to view what Matt
> > has decided to link, but to show you how things have changed at the
> > Drudge Report, I am going to provide this link from his page:
>
> > Group Slams HBO Show For 'Sexualizing Children'...
>
> > **Warning: Contains Graphic Image**
>
> >http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2012/04/angry-boys-right-wing-g...
>
> > Most of the time, Drudge reports on topical issues, particularly
> > political stories, but apparently in order to increase his site's
> > popularity, the amount of sex related stories seems to have increased
> > dramatically. As the old saying goes, "sex sells", and many times it
> > is used to attract a broader audience, but at a cost.
>
> > What do you think about the above story? Would you place a link to
> > that story on your page?
>
> > Drudge reportedly makes over $4 million dollars per year without the
> > sexualization of his page.
>
> > Why do you think he's turning tabloid?
>
> > All of the above is just my humble opinion.
>
> So you approve of TV shows depicting preteens sucking on plastic
> penises?
> Drudge should not be bringing this to the attention of the public, right?
> Pictures more innocent than that have been called child pornography.
> Read the child porn statute, child porn is defined as "an actual minor
> engaged in an explicit sexual act."
> The picture is of a minor performing a sexual act.
> The producers and parents of that child should be charged under the
> child porn statutes.
> Title 18 US Criminal Code, Chapter 110, sections 2251-2260
Tracey approves of preteens (female) sucking on HIS penis...just what
God requires 'em to do.
Paul
Alan Ferris
Apr 13, 2012, 6:02:15 PM4/13/12
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:46:22 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
<tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Go to bed, Brit. Its getting late in your neighborhood.
No its not.
<tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Go to bed, Brit. Its getting late in your neighborhood.
lsrlts
Apr 13, 2012, 6:51:03 PM4/13/12
to
On 4/13/2012 1:54 PM, Alan Ferris wrote:
> we cry
>
> Yup.
Weep on then.
> we cry
>
> Yup.
lsrlts
Apr 13, 2012, 6:53:15 PM4/13/12
to
On 4/13/2012 1:55 PM, Alan Ferris wrote:
> Bit of masochist I am.
>
we know.
> Bit of masochist I am.
>
we know.
lsrlts
Apr 13, 2012, 6:58:36 PM4/13/12
to
lsrlts
Apr 13, 2012, 6:59:50 PM4/13/12
to
lsrlts
Apr 13, 2012, 7:02:59 PM4/13/12
to
On 4/13/2012 3:02 PM, Alan Ferris wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:46:22 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
> <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Go to bed, Brit. Its getting late in your neighborhood.
>
> No its not.
The sun has long since set on your "empire"...
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:46:22 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
> <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Go to bed, Brit. Its getting late in your neighborhood.
>
> No its not.
George Kerby
Apr 13, 2012, 7:41:24 PM4/13/12
to
On 4/13/12 4:46 PM, in article
65950df1-73f3-4468...@x17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com,
need Fairy's "attention"!
He's putting on lip gloss as you wrote that for his 'Midnight Rendezvous'...
George Kerby
Apr 13, 2012, 7:43:03 PM4/13/12
to
On 4/13/12 5:02 PM, in article si8ho75fqrsb09sk7...@4ax.com,
"Alan Ferris" <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:46:22 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
> <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Go to bed, Brit. Its getting late in your neighborhood.
>
> No its not.
>
>
What did I tell ya?!?
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:46:22 -0700 (PDT), Tracey12
> <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Go to bed, Brit. Its getting late in your neighborhood.
>
> No its not.
>
>
Lube UP, Soho Boys!! Fairy's cummin'!!!
Antione Richie
Apr 13, 2012, 6:33:48 PM4/13/12
to
Real name Eric Elder. A prolific liar and fraud. Eric runs the gay
blog called "Rightardia.' Card-carrying member of moveon.org, hates
America, hates himself, hates everybody. Note that when you reply to
a Proven Liar you encourage them to continue lying.
Eric Charles Elder (65)
Mary W Elder (60)
1401 Woodgrove Ct
Palm Harbor, FL 34683
(727) 789-2029 [Verizon, land line]
[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"
http://rightardia.blogspot.com is Retardia's personal gay blog.
Everyone should avoid it because he is a STUPID:
[Courtesy of Buster Norris.]
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:55:33 -0700 (PDT), Secular Human
<eel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Aug 11, 9:34 pm, Secular Human <eeld...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> That's the Republican primary for governor, with Attorney General Bill
>> McCollumn sinking against rich teabagger Rick Scott. And when you're
>> sinking among Republicans, there's nothing like hate to prop you up
>> http://rightardia.blogspot.com/2010/08/EL_Republican_turd_AG_goes_ful...
>> ona.html
>The Senate district that the two Republicans are fighting over
Stupid little Butterball Bobbie................
McCollumn is running for GOVERNOR OF THE WHOLE STATE, YOU
DUMBASS...........
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>has a heavy Latin population.
>This is the wrong issue for the Republicans in
>south Florida.
South Florida????????
Stupid little Butterball Bobbie................
McCollumn is running for GOVERNOR OF THE WHOLE STATE, YOU
DUMBASS...........
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Stupid little Butterball Bobbie................
General Demographic Characteristics
Data Set: 2008 Population Estimates
Geographic Area: Florida
Total population 18,328,340
Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 3,845,069
Not Hispanic or Latino Total 14,483,271
White alone 11,059,062
http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/QTTable?-ds_name=PEP_2008_EST&-qr_name=PEP_2008_EST_DP1&-geo_id=04000US12
http://tinyurl.com/2u4bs5a
Stupid little Butterball Bobbie................
21% doesn't win elections, dumbass........................
How is it a 22-year old still living at home with Mommy and Daddy
hasn't served his country in the military????
DADT holding you back?????
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted from:
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/
blog called "Rightardia.' Card-carrying member of moveon.org, hates
America, hates himself, hates everybody. Note that when you reply to
a Proven Liar you encourage them to continue lying.
Eric Charles Elder (65)
Mary W Elder (60)
1401 Woodgrove Ct
Palm Harbor, FL 34683
(727) 789-2029 [Verizon, land line]
[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"
http://rightardia.blogspot.com is Retardia's personal gay blog.
Everyone should avoid it because he is a STUPID:
[Courtesy of Buster Norris.]
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 18:55:33 -0700 (PDT), Secular Human
<eel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Aug 11, 9:34 pm, Secular Human <eeld...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> That's the Republican primary for governor, with Attorney General Bill
>> McCollumn sinking against rich teabagger Rick Scott. And when you're
>> sinking among Republicans, there's nothing like hate to prop you up
>> http://rightardia.blogspot.com/2010/08/EL_Republican_turd_AG_goes_ful...
>> ona.html
>The Senate district that the two Republicans are fighting over
Stupid little Butterball Bobbie................
McCollumn is running for GOVERNOR OF THE WHOLE STATE, YOU
DUMBASS...........
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>has a heavy Latin population.
>This is the wrong issue for the Republicans in
>south Florida.
South Florida????????
Stupid little Butterball Bobbie................
McCollumn is running for GOVERNOR OF THE WHOLE STATE, YOU
DUMBASS...........
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Stupid little Butterball Bobbie................
General Demographic Characteristics
Data Set: 2008 Population Estimates
Geographic Area: Florida
Total population 18,328,340
Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 3,845,069
Not Hispanic or Latino Total 14,483,271
White alone 11,059,062
http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/QTTable?-ds_name=PEP_2008_EST&-qr_name=PEP_2008_EST_DP1&-geo_id=04000US12
http://tinyurl.com/2u4bs5a
Stupid little Butterball Bobbie................
21% doesn't win elections, dumbass........................
How is it a 22-year old still living at home with Mommy and Daddy
hasn't served his country in the military????
DADT holding you back?????
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted from:
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/
Paul Duca
Apr 14, 2012, 12:14:08 AM4/14/12
to
Paul Duca
Apr 14, 2012, 12:15:26 AM4/14/12
to
Alan Ferris
Apr 14, 2012, 8:34:54 AM4/14/12
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:51:03 -0700, lsrlts <dd...@gnail.invalid>
wrote:
>On 4/13/2012 1:54 PM, Alan Ferris wrote:
>> we cry
>>
>> Yup.
>
>Weep
Ask mummy for a tissue.
wrote:
>On 4/13/2012 1:54 PM, Alan Ferris wrote:
>> we cry
>>
>> Yup.
>
>Weep
Alan Ferris
Apr 14, 2012, 8:35:14 AM4/14/12
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:02:59 -0700, lsrlts <dd...@gnail.invalid>
wrote:
Odd, my empire is fine.
wrote:
Alan Ferris
Apr 14, 2012, 8:35:46 AM4/14/12
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:43:03 -0500, George Kerby
<ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Lube UP, Soho Boys!! I'm cummin'!!!
I think you will find that your daddy beat you.
<ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Lube UP, Soho Boys!! I'm cummin'!!!
I think you will find that your daddy beat you.
Alan Ferris
Apr 14, 2012, 8:36:45 AM4/14/12
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:59:50 -0700, lsrlts <dd...@gnail.invalid>
wrote:
>> Go to bed, Brit. Its getting late in your neighborhood.
>>
>We might chip in, send him a bottle of flouride rinse..
Do you really think you all have enough spare cash?
Or were you planning to steal it?
wrote:
>> Go to bed, Brit. Its getting late in your neighborhood.
>>
>We might chip in, send him a bottle of flouride rinse..
Or were you planning to steal it?
Alan Ferris
Apr 14, 2012, 8:37:16 AM4/14/12
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:41:24 -0500, George Kerby
<ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Are you kidding?!? It's Friday night and there are young men in Soho who
>need daddy's "attention"!
<ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Are you kidding?!? It's Friday night and there are young men in Soho who
I heard he is a regular down there
Alan Ferris
Apr 14, 2012, 8:37:55 AM4/14/12
to
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:53:15 -0700, lsrlts <dd...@gnail.invalid>
wrote:
>On 4/13/2012 1:55 PM, Alan Ferris wrote:
>
>> Bit of masochist are you.
>>
>
>we know.
Indeed. You keep coming back.
wrote:
>On 4/13/2012 1:55 PM, Alan Ferris wrote:
>
>>
>
>we know.
Indeed. You keep coming back.
George Kerby
Apr 14, 2012, 9:56:00 AM4/14/12
to
On 4/14/12 7:37 AM, in article 7rrio71f8aik4lsnc...@4ax.com,
"Alan Ferris" <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:41:24 -0500, George Kerby
> <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Are you kidding?!? It's Friday night and there are young men in Soho who
>> need Fairy's "attention"!
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:41:24 -0500, George Kerby
> <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Are you kidding?!? It's Friday night and there are young men in Soho who
>
> I heard he is a regular down there
>
You heard right.
> I heard he is a regular down there
>
BTW: Why do you refer to yourself in the 'third person' sense?!?
Alan Ferris
Apr 14, 2012, 10:44:33 AM4/14/12
to
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 08:56:00 -0500, George Kerby
<ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>On 4/14/12 7:37 AM, in article 7rrio71f8aik4lsnc...@4ax.com,
>"Alan Ferris" <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:41:24 -0500, George Kerby
>> <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Are you kidding?!? It's Friday night and there are young men in Soho who
>>> need my dad's "attention"!
>
>
>
>On 4/14/12 7:37 AM, in article 7rrio71f8aik4lsnc...@4ax.com,
>"Alan Ferris" <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:41:24 -0500, George Kerby
>> <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Are you kidding?!? It's Friday night and there are young men in Soho who
>>
>> I heard he is a regular down there
>>
>
>You heard right.
>
>BTW: Why do you refer to yourself in the 'third person' sense?!?
I am not your dad.
>> I heard he is a regular down there
>>
>
>You heard right.
>
>BTW: Why do you refer to yourself in the 'third person' sense?!?
George Kerby
Apr 14, 2012, 12:09:42 PM4/14/12
to
On 4/14/12 9:44 AM, in article l93jo7tbngt64c5g5...@4ax.com,
"Alan Ferris" <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 08:56:00 -0500, George Kerby
> <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/14/12 7:37 AM, in article 7rrio71f8aik4lsnc...@4ax.com,
>> "Alan Ferris" <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:41:24 -0500, George Kerby
>>> <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are you kidding?!? It's Friday night and there are young men in Soho who
>>>> need my dad's "attention"!
>>>
>>> I heard he is a regular down there
>>>
>>
>> You heard right.
>>
>> BTW: Why do you refer to yourself in the 'third person' sense?!?
>
> I am not your dad.
>
You are not ANYONE'S father. Sex with other men does not procreate. God help
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 08:56:00 -0500, George Kerby
> <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 4/14/12 7:37 AM, in article 7rrio71f8aik4lsnc...@4ax.com,
>> "Alan Ferris" <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:41:24 -0500, George Kerby
>>> <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are you kidding?!? It's Friday night and there are young men in Soho who
>>>> need my dad's "attention"!
>>>
>>> I heard he is a regular down there
>>>
>>
>> You heard right.
>>
>> BTW: Why do you refer to yourself in the 'third person' sense?!?
>
> I am not your dad.
>
us all that your gene pool will soon be drained, Fairy.
lsrlts
Apr 14, 2012, 12:18:41 PM4/14/12
to
On 4/14/2012 5:34 AM, Alan Ferris is a Brit-turd.
lsrlts
Apr 14, 2012, 12:18:51 PM4/14/12
to
On 4/14/2012 5:35 AM, Alan Ferrisis a Brit-turd.
lsrlts
Apr 14, 2012, 12:19:02 PM4/14/12
to
On 4/14/is a Brit-turd.2012 5:35 AM, Alan Ferris
lsrlts
Apr 14, 2012, 12:19:15 PM4/14/12
to
On 4/14/2012 5:36 AM, Alan Ferris is a Brit-turd.
lsrlts
Apr 14, 2012, 12:19:27 PM4/14/12
to
On 4/14/2012 5:37 AM, Alan Ferris is a Brit-turd.
Alan Ferris
Apr 14, 2012, 1:07:30 PM4/14/12
to
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:18:41 -0700, Trailer trash lsrlts
<dd...@gnail.invalid> wrote nothing.
February 2012: Michael Grimm
In January 2012, The New York Times published a bombshell report
claiming that Congressman Michael Grimm together with a man under FBI
investigation for embezzlement, raised more than $500,000 in tainted
campaign cash by taking contributions in excess of federal limits,
taking contributions from foreign nationals, setting up “straw
donors,” and personally receiving envelopes filled with cash.
A few weeks later, it was reported that Grimm had collected $3,000 in
campaign contributions from proponents of a natural pipeline seven
months after the freshman Republican sponsored allowing the project to
move forward.
“Isn't that the way fundraising is supposed to work?” asked Grimm. “I
am doing what an elected official is supposed to do.”
By mid February 2010, The New York Times took a deeper look into
Grimm's past revealing a history no politician would ever want to
tout. Grimm, who had often boasted about his background as a small
businessman and his time working on Wall Street, had a long business
relationship with Carlos Luquis - before, during and after Luquis'
conviction for racketeering and fraud. Not only has Grimm hidden his
business dealings with his convicted felon friend, he also may have
lied about working at a Wall Street firm that was “sanctioned
repeatedly for gouging customers.”
Furthermore, The New York Times discovered that the New York State
Workers’ Compensation Board had ordered Grimm’s restaurant,
Healthalicious, to pay $88,000 for not carrying workers’ compensation
insurance. And in 2011, two of the restaurant’s former deliverymen had
claimed they were paid less than minimum wage and were not paid wages
for any work done beyond 40 hours per week.
During roughly the same time that the New York Times was uncovering
Grimm’s past, the New York Republican’s staff added to the
controversies surrounding the Congressman. On February 17, 2012 one of
Grimm’s Brooklyn staffers was arrested outside of a school and charged
with assault, menacing and endangering the welfare of a child.
Additionally, Grimm had decided to hire a different aide who once used
her political connection to land a construction job for her husband,
whose incompetent management resulted in the death of a 17-year-old
girl.
A few days later, the New York Daily News reported Grimm had once
written a letter urging a federal judge to spare a New York-based
developer with three bribery-related convictions from serving a day in
prison.
<dd...@gnail.invalid> wrote nothing.
February 2012: Michael Grimm
In January 2012, The New York Times published a bombshell report
claiming that Congressman Michael Grimm together with a man under FBI
investigation for embezzlement, raised more than $500,000 in tainted
campaign cash by taking contributions in excess of federal limits,
taking contributions from foreign nationals, setting up “straw
donors,” and personally receiving envelopes filled with cash.
A few weeks later, it was reported that Grimm had collected $3,000 in
campaign contributions from proponents of a natural pipeline seven
months after the freshman Republican sponsored allowing the project to
move forward.
“Isn't that the way fundraising is supposed to work?” asked Grimm. “I
am doing what an elected official is supposed to do.”
By mid February 2010, The New York Times took a deeper look into
Grimm's past revealing a history no politician would ever want to
tout. Grimm, who had often boasted about his background as a small
businessman and his time working on Wall Street, had a long business
relationship with Carlos Luquis - before, during and after Luquis'
conviction for racketeering and fraud. Not only has Grimm hidden his
business dealings with his convicted felon friend, he also may have
lied about working at a Wall Street firm that was “sanctioned
repeatedly for gouging customers.”
Furthermore, The New York Times discovered that the New York State
Workers’ Compensation Board had ordered Grimm’s restaurant,
Healthalicious, to pay $88,000 for not carrying workers’ compensation
insurance. And in 2011, two of the restaurant’s former deliverymen had
claimed they were paid less than minimum wage and were not paid wages
for any work done beyond 40 hours per week.
During roughly the same time that the New York Times was uncovering
Grimm’s past, the New York Republican’s staff added to the
controversies surrounding the Congressman. On February 17, 2012 one of
Grimm’s Brooklyn staffers was arrested outside of a school and charged
with assault, menacing and endangering the welfare of a child.
Additionally, Grimm had decided to hire a different aide who once used
her political connection to land a construction job for her husband,
whose incompetent management resulted in the death of a 17-year-old
girl.
A few days later, the New York Daily News reported Grimm had once
written a letter urging a federal judge to spare a New York-based
developer with three bribery-related convictions from serving a day in
prison.
Alan Ferris
Apr 14, 2012, 1:26:44 PM4/14/12
to
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:19:02 -0700, Trailer trash lsrlts
<dd...@gnail.invalid> wrote nothing.
January 2012: Vern Buchanan
Another month, another investigation into the National Republican
Congressional Committee’s finance chairman’s campaign contributions.
Congressman Vern Buchanan’s ethical troubles center on an “extensive
and ongoing scheme” to reimburse his employees for contributing to
Buchanan’s congressional campaign.
The Federal Election Commission report has previously stated that
Buchanan “more likely than not” violated federal law, and the
Department of Justice’s probe proves Buchanan still has ethical
troubles.
In October 2011, the Bradenton Herald reported that that the
Department of Justice has launched an investigation into allegations
that Buchanan broke campaign finance laws.
Additionally, in October, the Office of Congressional Ethics
unanimously voted to refer Vern Buchanan to the House Ethics Committee
for violating federal law for failing to disclose his positions in 17
entities. The Office of Congressional Ethics also that found there is
“substantial reason to believe” that Buchanan violated federal law by
failing to disclose $14,000 of income.
Buchanan continues to be dogged by ethics investigations, including
one by the FBI.
<dd...@gnail.invalid> wrote nothing.
January 2012: Vern Buchanan
Another month, another investigation into the National Republican
Congressional Committee’s finance chairman’s campaign contributions.
Congressman Vern Buchanan’s ethical troubles center on an “extensive
and ongoing scheme” to reimburse his employees for contributing to
Buchanan’s congressional campaign.
The Federal Election Commission report has previously stated that
Buchanan “more likely than not” violated federal law, and the
Department of Justice’s probe proves Buchanan still has ethical
troubles.
In October 2011, the Bradenton Herald reported that that the
Department of Justice has launched an investigation into allegations
that Buchanan broke campaign finance laws.
Additionally, in October, the Office of Congressional Ethics
unanimously voted to refer Vern Buchanan to the House Ethics Committee
for violating federal law for failing to disclose his positions in 17
entities. The Office of Congressional Ethics also that found there is
“substantial reason to believe” that Buchanan violated federal law by
failing to disclose $14,000 of income.
Buchanan continues to be dogged by ethics investigations, including
one by the FBI.
Alan Ferris
Apr 14, 2012, 1:28:42 PM4/14/12
to
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:19:15 -0700, Colonial lsrlts
<dd...@gnail.invalid> wrote nothing:
December 2011: Pete Sessions
The New Year is usually a time when Americans make commitments to
reform their bad habits. Let’s hope National Republican Congressional
Committee Chairman Congressman Pete Sessions does the same
.
Sessions has come under scrutiny for receiving a preferential loan not
available to ordinary borrowers from Countrywide Financial.
These types of VIP loans had previously come under scrutiny after the
nation’s largest mortgage lender was rescued during the subprime
mortgage crisis and as the public realized that the discounted loans
were extended to curry favor with members of Congress and other
influential people who could help the company.
Previously, Sessions came under fire for securing a $1.6 million
earmark for an out-of-state company to develop high-tech blimps.
Sessions secured the earmark for one of his former aides, a registered
lobbyist with a criminal record who has made more than $446,000
lobbying on the company's behalf and has who had contributed thousands
of dollars to Sessions.
In December 2011, the mortgage matter was referred to the House Ethics
Committee.
<dd...@gnail.invalid> wrote nothing:
December 2011: Pete Sessions
The New Year is usually a time when Americans make commitments to
reform their bad habits. Let’s hope National Republican Congressional
Committee Chairman Congressman Pete Sessions does the same
.
Sessions has come under scrutiny for receiving a preferential loan not
available to ordinary borrowers from Countrywide Financial.
These types of VIP loans had previously come under scrutiny after the
nation’s largest mortgage lender was rescued during the subprime
mortgage crisis and as the public realized that the discounted loans
were extended to curry favor with members of Congress and other
influential people who could help the company.
Previously, Sessions came under fire for securing a $1.6 million
earmark for an out-of-state company to develop high-tech blimps.
Sessions secured the earmark for one of his former aides, a registered
lobbyist with a criminal record who has made more than $446,000
lobbying on the company's behalf and has who had contributed thousands
of dollars to Sessions.
In December 2011, the mortgage matter was referred to the House Ethics
Committee.
Alan Ferris
Apr 14, 2012, 1:30:58 PM4/14/12
to
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:09:42 -0500, George Kerby
<ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Sex with other men does not procreate. God help me procreate
Your dad managed it.....or do you need to speak to your mum about
that?
<ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Sex with other men does not procreate. God help me procreate
Your dad managed it.....or do you need to speak to your mum about
that?
Alan Ferris
Apr 14, 2012, 1:33:12 PM4/14/12
to
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:19:27 -0700, Queer lsrlts <dd...@gnail.invalid>
wrote nothing.
November 2011: Tim Griffin
Karl Rove’s protégé, Congressman Tim Griffin, is just as ethically
compromised as his former boss.
While heading the Republican National Committee’s research department,
Griffin led an effort to suppress African-American voter turnout in
Florida. The process, known as “voter caging,” is an effort to
disqualify voters who fail to sign for registered campaign mail sent
to their registered addresses.
After his stint at the Republican National Committee, Griffin joined
the White House as a special assistant to the president and Karl
Rove’s deputy. As a member of Rove’s staff, Griffin was aware the
White House was firing non-partisan U.S. attorneys, which was later
proven to be motivated by nefarious political reasons.
Using a provision in the Patriot Act that allowed him to avoid a
Senate confirmation, Griffin was named an interim U.S. attorney in the
Eastern District of Arkansas in December 2006. To make room for
Griffin’s appointment, the White House removed sitting U.S. attorney,
Bud Cummins, in part because “it was important to…Karl [Rove].”
Five months into his tenure as a U.S. attorney, Griffin resigned
rather than face Senate confirmation.
wrote nothing.
November 2011: Tim Griffin
Karl Rove’s protégé, Congressman Tim Griffin, is just as ethically
compromised as his former boss.
While heading the Republican National Committee’s research department,
Griffin led an effort to suppress African-American voter turnout in
Florida. The process, known as “voter caging,” is an effort to
disqualify voters who fail to sign for registered campaign mail sent
to their registered addresses.
After his stint at the Republican National Committee, Griffin joined
the White House as a special assistant to the president and Karl
Rove’s deputy. As a member of Rove’s staff, Griffin was aware the
White House was firing non-partisan U.S. attorneys, which was later
proven to be motivated by nefarious political reasons.
Using a provision in the Patriot Act that allowed him to avoid a
Senate confirmation, Griffin was named an interim U.S. attorney in the
Eastern District of Arkansas in December 2006. To make room for
Griffin’s appointment, the White House removed sitting U.S. attorney,
Bud Cummins, in part because “it was important to…Karl [Rove].”
Five months into his tenure as a U.S. attorney, Griffin resigned
rather than face Senate confirmation.
George Kerby
Apr 14, 2012, 2:08:34 PM4/14/12
to
On 4/14/12 12:30 PM, in article 41djo7l2s42j35lgv...@4ax.com,
"Alan Ferris" <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:09:42 -0500, George Kerby
> <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Sex with other men does not procreate. God help me procreate
>
> Your dad managed it.....or do you need to speak to your mum about
> that?
>
I noticed that you are being 'mum' about your adventures last night. How's
> On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:09:42 -0500, George Kerby
> <ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Sex with other men does not procreate. God help me procreate
>
> Your dad managed it.....or do you need to speak to your mum about
> that?
>
the headache and sore distal sphincter today, Fairy?
Those boys you played got your 'mum', hanging, LOL!!!
Alan Ferris
Apr 14, 2012, 3:11:29 PM4/14/12
to
On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:08:34 -0500, George Kerby
<ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>I noticed that dad was being 'mum' about our adventures last night. I have
>a headache and sore distal sphincter today.
Did your dad take all your lube?
<ghost_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>I noticed that dad was being 'mum' about our adventures last night. I have
>a headache and sore distal sphincter today.
Did your dad take all your lube?
Paul Duca
Apr 14, 2012, 5:26:07 PM4/14/12
to
On Apr 14, 12:09 pm, George Kerby <ghost_top...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/14/12 9:44 AM, in article l93jo7tbngt64c5g5704mavti8r2hg3...@4ax.com,
>
> >> On 4/14/12 7:37 AM, in article 7rrio71f8aik4lsncpqhuoija442ntc...@4ax.com,
> On 4/14/12 9:44 AM, in article l93jo7tbngt64c5g5704mavti8r2hg3...@4ax.com,
>
>
>
> "Alan Ferris" <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 08:56:00 -0500, George Kerby
> > <ghost_top...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> "Alan Ferris" <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Apr 2012 08:56:00 -0500, George Kerby
>
> >> On 4/14/12 7:37 AM, in article 7rrio71f8aik4lsncpqhuoija442ntc...@4ax.com,
> >> "Alan Ferris" <hairy.fer...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:41:24 -0500, George Kerby
> >>> <ghost_top...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> Are you kidding?!? It's Friday night and there are young men in Soho who
> >>>> need my dad's "attention"!
>
> >>> I heard he is a regular down there
>
> >> You heard right.
>
> >> BTW: Why do you refer to yourself in the 'third person' sense?!?
>
> > I am not your dad.
>
> You are not ANYONE'S father. Sex with other men does not procreate. God help
> us all in ANY way, although He hasn't bothered doing so before.
>
> >>> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:41:24 -0500, George Kerby
> >>> <ghost_top...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> Are you kidding?!? It's Friday night and there are young men in Soho who
> >>>> need my dad's "attention"!
>
> >>> I heard he is a regular down there
>
> >> You heard right.
>
> >> BTW: Why do you refer to yourself in the 'third person' sense?!?
>
> > I am not your dad.
>
> You are not ANYONE'S father. Sex with other men does not procreate. God help
Paul Duca (tomservo56954@comcast.net)
Apr 16, 2012, 5:32:57 PM4/16/12
to
If so, he'll be right at Tracey's intellectual level....
Paul.
Paul.
0 new messages