Message from discussion 21 years in prison for killing 77 Obama supporters. A bargain on any day.
Received: by 10.216.203.96 with SMTP id e74mr1389934weo.1.1352752371461;
Mon, 12 Nov 2012 12:32:51 -0800 (PST)
From: Gray Guest <No_email_for_...@wahoo.com>
Subject: Re: 21 years in prison for killing 77 Obama supporters. A bargain on any day.
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 22:42:50 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 22:42:50 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a97bb021cf6712b4283dee8a8e761414";
logging-data="18835"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+DgPSE9hC1rGapHlcpcfX98zw+RdV1XS0="
Gunner <gunnera...@gmail.com> wrote in
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 04:12:51 -0800 (PST), walt tonne
>>One day he will be regarded as a hero.
> Crooked Politics: Obama Lost in Every State With Photo ID Law
> By The American Third Position
> November 7 | Was the election stolen? Remember all those lawsuits by
> Democrats demanding that any voter identification laws be repealed.
> Well, now we know why they filed them. They needed to steal the vote
> in certain key states so that Obama could be reelected.
> Curiously, Obama lost in every state that requires a photo ID to be
> produced before voting. A list of closely contested state elections
> with no voter ID, which narrowly went to Obama include:
> Minnesota (10),
> Iowa (6),
> Wisconsin (10),
> Nevada (6),
> Colorado (9),
> New Mexico (5) and,
> Pennsylvania (20).
> This amounts to a total of 66 electoral votes. When added to Romneyï¿½s
> total of 205 electoral votes, that would give Romney 271 electoral
> votes, enough votes to win even without Ohio or Florida.
> Romney also likely had the states of Florida and Ohio stolen from him,
> which donï¿½t require photo IDs. Ohio requires a non-photo ID. Would a
> library card do? Florida ï¿½requestsï¿½ a photo ID, but doesnï¿½t require
> So what happens if they request a photo ID and the illegal alien
> Haitian doesnï¿½t have one? Do they just count the vote anyway?
> Add to all this, electronic vote fraud. An article from the Blaze
> reports ï¿½Last week, TheBlaze brought you a story from a North Carolina
> voting precinct using electronic voting machines that was already
> experiencing issues where votes for GOP candidate Mitt Romney were
> being changed to Democratic candidate Barack Obama. Now, itï¿½s
> allegedly happening again, this time in both Kansas and Ohio ï¿½ and we
> talked to a vendor supporting the machines about the issue.
> Nancy from Topeka, Kan., who asked that her last name not be used for
> reasons pertaining to her husbandï¿½s work, told The Blaze she fears if
> voters arenï¿½t double checking their selections, theyï¿½ll be ï¿½robbed of
> their vote.ï¿½ Nancy explained that while her husband was casting a vote
> for Romney, the touchscreen highlighted Obama.
> ï¿½He played around with the field a little and realized that in order
> to vote for Romney, his finger had to be exactly on the mark,ï¿½ Nancy
> wrote in an email. She said ï¿½the invisible Obama field came down about
> 1/4 [of an inch]ï¿½ into what should technically have been the Romney
> Funny how this ï¿½glitchï¿½ only benefited Obama while stealing votes from
> Romney. I wonder how many other ï¿½glitchesï¿½ were out there and how big
> a role they played in Obamaï¿½s ï¿½victoryï¿½.
> No incumbent president in the last 60 years has won reelection
> with the unemployment rate as high as it currently is. The only way
> left for the Democrats to keep Obama in office was to steal the
> election. Obama failed to win ANY states with photo ID laws for
> voters, but he did win all the swing states which require no voter ID.
> Add to this electronic ï¿½glitchesï¿½ that gave Obama votes meant for
> Romney, and itï¿½s pretty obvious what happened on November 6th, 2012.
> We just became a Third World country.
> In Chicago, Obama shows his ID before voting. (Illinois has no Voter
> ID Law.) (See Obama voting video here.)
> * New voter ID law has not yet been implemented; state presently has
> no voter ID law in effect.
> ** New voter ID law has not yet been implemented; an older voter ID
> law remains in effect.
> In Alabama, South Carolina and Texas, current non-photo voter ID
> laws stay in effect for the time being. The new photo voter ID
> requirements will take effect after receiving preclearance under
> Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. South Carolina and Texas were
> denied pre-clearance in December 2011 and March 2012, respectively.
> Alabamaï¿½s new photo ID law has a 2014 effective date, and the state
> has not yet applied for pre-clearance. The Texas law was recently
> denied pre-clearance by a federal court in D.C.; a similar court is
> currently considering South Carolinaï¿½s law.
> Wisconsinï¿½s voter ID law was declared unconstitutional on March
> 12, 2012. Dane County Circuit Judge Richard Niess issued a permanent
> injunction barring enforcement of the law, which the state has said it
> will appeal. Read the March 6 injunction and the March 12 injunction.
> There are some who prefer to call Oklahoma a photo voter ID state,
> because most voters will show a photo ID before voting. However,
> Oklahoma law also permits a voter registration card issued by the
> appropriate county elections board to serve as proof of identity in
> lieu of photo ID.
> Rhode Islandï¿½s voter ID law takes effect in two stages. The first
> stage, requiring a non-photo ID, took effect on January 1, 2012. On
> January 1, 2014, a photo ID requirement will replace the non-photo ID
> Alabamaï¿½s new photo ID requirement takes effect with the 2014
> statewide primary election. The new law also requires preclearance.
> The delayed implementation date was intended to ensure that the timing
> of preclearance did not occur between the primary and general
> elections of 2012, thus creating voter confusion.
> Mississippiï¿½s new voter ID law was passed via the citizen
> initiative process. However, the language in constitutional amendment
> passed by MS voters on Nov. 8 is very general, and implementing
> legislation will be required before the amendment can take effect. The
> MS provision will also require pre-clearance under Section 5 of the
> Voting Rights Act before it can take effect.
> A state judge temporarily blocked enforcement of Pennsylvaniaï¿½s
> new voter ID law. It will not be in effect for the November 2012
> election, and a trial on its permanent status will begin after the
> ""The Democratic constituency is just like a herd of cows. All you have
> to do is lay out enough silage and they come running. Thatï¿½s why I
> became an operative working with Democrats. With Democrats all you
> have to do is make a lot of noise, lay out the hay, and be ready to
> use the ole cattle prod in case a few want to bolt the herd.
> Eighty percent of the people who call themselves Democrats donï¿½t have
> a clue as to political reality.
> What amazes me is that you could take a group of people who are hard
> workers and convince them that they should support social programs
> that were the exact opposite of their own personal convictions. Put a
> little fear here and there and you can get people to vote any way you
> The voter is basically dumb and lazy. The reason I became a Democratic
> operative instead of a Republican was because there were more
> Democrats that didnï¿½t have a clue than there were Republicans."
> James Carvell, DNC operative
And did you notice how the UN onservers didn't observe any irregularities?
Things that make you say hmmm.
Libs suffer from Eleutherophobia. And there is no cure.
Obama called the SEALs and THEY got bin Laden. When the SEALs called Obama,
THEY GOT DENIED. Fuck Obama