Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
21 years in prison for killing 77 Obama supporters. A bargain on any day.
47 views
Skip to first unread message
Oslo Dispatch
Nov 10, 2012, 12:54:07 AM11/10/12
to
By SCOTT SAYARE
Anders Behring Breivik would like butter, a new pen, more
comfortable handcuffs and a view.
Mr. Breivik, the Norwegian extremist convicted of the coldly
premeditated murders of 77 people in 2011, is serving a 21-year
sentence in a maximum-security prison outside Oslo. He is not
satisfied with the accommodations, though: his three-cell suite
with a television and exercise equipment, lodgings commensurate
with Norway’s typically humane treatment of its convicts.
Addressing penal officials in a 27-page letter obtained by the
Norwegian newspaper Verdens Gang and confirmed by his lawyer,
Mr. Breivik bemoaned the “800” strip searches he has undergone,
for instance. Not one of them has shown him to be holding an
object “between the buttocks,” he noted.
He would enjoy more social interaction, according to the letter,
which says he is alone with his thoughts for “23 hours and 55
minutes” on a typical day and speaks only with his guards.
“Such treatment isn’t human,” said a lawyer for Mr. Breivik,
Tord Jordet, according to Agence France-Presse.
Mr. Breivik is denied a computer or Internet access to prevent
him from spreading his ideology of racial hatred, officials have
said.
He expressed many other concerns in his letter, many of them
prosaic. He must be supervised while shaving and brushing his
teeth, he complained, and because of the “mental strain” this
causes he is forced to limit those activities to once a week.
Nor is he permitted to keep hydrating skin cream in his
quarters, which are drab and without a view, he wrote. Switches
for his lights and television are outside his suite of cells,
obliging him to summon guards to turn them on and off.
Mr. Breivik dislikes handcuffs, too, because the steel edges cut
into his wrists, and he dreads putting them on for each trip
outside his cell, Verdens Gang reported. Without a thermos, his
coffee frequently goes cold, according to news media reports.
Furthermore, he wrote, his phone calls and mail are unfairly
censored. “His freedom of speech is being violated,” Mr. Jordet
said.
Only correspondence from “New Testament Christians and other
people who do not like me” has reached him in recent months, Mr.
Breivik wrote.
Letters aside, Mr. Breivik would like to pursue his literary
ambitions while in prison, he said, but those aspirations are
being thwarted by the stab-resistant safety pen he has been
provided, “a nightmare of a tool” that causes his hand to cramp.
The pen is “an almost indescribable manifestation of sadism,” he
wrote, though presumably it did not prevent him from composing
his lengthy letter of complaint.
A prison spokeswoman said Mr. Breivik was given an electric
typewriter on Friday. It was not given in response to Mr.
Breivik’s letter, the spokeswoman said, according to The
Associated Press.
“I highly doubt that there are worse detention facilities in
Norway,” Mr. Breivik wrote.
Mr. Breivik’s 21-year sentence is the country’s maximum, and he
is considered the most heinous offender in modern Scandinavian
history.
Mr. Breivik confessed to setting off bombs in downtown Oslo in
July 2011 before shooting dozens of people at a summer youth
camp run by the Labor Party. He said the killings were intended
to protect Norway from Muslims and multiculturalism.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/10/world/europe/norway-killer-
breivik-complains-about-prison.html
Anders Behring Breivik would like butter, a new pen, more
comfortable handcuffs and a view.
Mr. Breivik, the Norwegian extremist convicted of the coldly
premeditated murders of 77 people in 2011, is serving a 21-year
sentence in a maximum-security prison outside Oslo. He is not
satisfied with the accommodations, though: his three-cell suite
with a television and exercise equipment, lodgings commensurate
with Norway’s typically humane treatment of its convicts.
Addressing penal officials in a 27-page letter obtained by the
Norwegian newspaper Verdens Gang and confirmed by his lawyer,
Mr. Breivik bemoaned the “800” strip searches he has undergone,
for instance. Not one of them has shown him to be holding an
object “between the buttocks,” he noted.
He would enjoy more social interaction, according to the letter,
which says he is alone with his thoughts for “23 hours and 55
minutes” on a typical day and speaks only with his guards.
“Such treatment isn’t human,” said a lawyer for Mr. Breivik,
Tord Jordet, according to Agence France-Presse.
Mr. Breivik is denied a computer or Internet access to prevent
him from spreading his ideology of racial hatred, officials have
said.
He expressed many other concerns in his letter, many of them
prosaic. He must be supervised while shaving and brushing his
teeth, he complained, and because of the “mental strain” this
causes he is forced to limit those activities to once a week.
Nor is he permitted to keep hydrating skin cream in his
quarters, which are drab and without a view, he wrote. Switches
for his lights and television are outside his suite of cells,
obliging him to summon guards to turn them on and off.
Mr. Breivik dislikes handcuffs, too, because the steel edges cut
into his wrists, and he dreads putting them on for each trip
outside his cell, Verdens Gang reported. Without a thermos, his
coffee frequently goes cold, according to news media reports.
Furthermore, he wrote, his phone calls and mail are unfairly
censored. “His freedom of speech is being violated,” Mr. Jordet
said.
Only correspondence from “New Testament Christians and other
people who do not like me” has reached him in recent months, Mr.
Breivik wrote.
Letters aside, Mr. Breivik would like to pursue his literary
ambitions while in prison, he said, but those aspirations are
being thwarted by the stab-resistant safety pen he has been
provided, “a nightmare of a tool” that causes his hand to cramp.
The pen is “an almost indescribable manifestation of sadism,” he
wrote, though presumably it did not prevent him from composing
his lengthy letter of complaint.
A prison spokeswoman said Mr. Breivik was given an electric
typewriter on Friday. It was not given in response to Mr.
Breivik’s letter, the spokeswoman said, according to The
Associated Press.
“I highly doubt that there are worse detention facilities in
Norway,” Mr. Breivik wrote.
Mr. Breivik’s 21-year sentence is the country’s maximum, and he
is considered the most heinous offender in modern Scandinavian
history.
Mr. Breivik confessed to setting off bombs in downtown Oslo in
July 2011 before shooting dozens of people at a summer youth
camp run by the Labor Party. He said the killings were intended
to protect Norway from Muslims and multiculturalism.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/10/world/europe/norway-killer-
breivik-complains-about-prison.html
walt tonne
Nov 10, 2012, 7:12:51 AM11/10/12
to
One day he will be regarded as a hero.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 10, 2012, 8:25:41 AM11/10/12
to
>walt tonne <tonnew...@gmail.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>One day he will be regarded as a hero.
He's already regarded as a hero, but only by glue sniffing pedophiles
like yourself.
>One day he will be regarded as a hero.
like yourself.
Gunner
Nov 10, 2012, 2:21:25 PM11/10/12
to
--
""The Democratic constituency is just like a herd of cows. All you have
to do is lay out enough silage and they come running. That’s why I
became an operative working with Democrats. With Democrats all you
have to do is make a lot of noise, lay out the hay, and be ready to
use the ole cattle prod in case a few want to bolt the herd.
Eighty percent of the people who call themselves Democrats don’t have
a clue as to political reality.
What amazes me is that you could take a group of people who are hard
workers and convince them that they should support social programs
that were the exact opposite of their own personal convictions. Put a
little fear here and there and you can get people to vote any way you
want.
The voter is basically dumb and lazy. The reason I became a Democratic
operative instead of a Republican was because there were more
Democrats that didn’t have a clue than there were Republicans."
James Carvell, DNC operative
Gunner
Nov 10, 2012, 3:10:32 PM11/10/12
to
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 04:12:51 -0800 (PST), walt tonne
<tonnew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>One day he will be regarded as a hero.
http://www.standupamericaus.org/politics-ii/voter-id-laws-obama-lost-in-every-state-that-had-them/
<tonnew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>One day he will be regarded as a hero.
Crooked Politics: Obama Lost in Every State With Photo ID Law
By The American Third Position
November 7 | Was the election stolen? Remember all those lawsuits by
Democrats demanding that any voter identification laws be repealed.
Well, now we know why they filed them. They needed to steal the vote
in certain key states so that Obama could be reelected.
Curiously, Obama lost in every state that requires a photo ID to be
produced before voting. A list of closely contested state elections
with no voter ID, which narrowly went to Obama include:
Minnesota (10),
Iowa (6),
Wisconsin (10),
Nevada (6),
Colorado (9),
New Mexico (5) and,
Pennsylvania (20).
This amounts to a total of 66 electoral votes. When added to Romney’s
total of 205 electoral votes, that would give Romney 271 electoral
votes, enough votes to win even without Ohio or Florida.
Romney also likely had the states of Florida and Ohio stolen from him,
which don’t require photo IDs. Ohio requires a non-photo ID. Would a
library card do? Florida “requests” a photo ID, but doesn’t require
it.
So what happens if they request a photo ID and the illegal alien
Haitian doesn’t have one? Do they just count the vote anyway?
Add to all this, electronic vote fraud. An article from the Blaze
reports “Last week, TheBlaze brought you a story from a North Carolina
voting precinct using electronic voting machines that was already
experiencing issues where votes for GOP candidate Mitt Romney were
being changed to Democratic candidate Barack Obama. Now, it’s
allegedly happening again, this time in both Kansas and Ohio — and we
talked to a vendor supporting the machines about the issue.
Nancy from Topeka, Kan., who asked that her last name not be used for
reasons pertaining to her husband’s work, told The Blaze she fears if
voters aren’t double checking their selections, they’ll be ‘robbed of
their vote.’ Nancy explained that while her husband was casting a vote
for Romney, the touchscreen highlighted Obama.
“He played around with the field a little and realized that in order
to vote for Romney, his finger had to be exactly on the mark,” Nancy
wrote in an email. She said ‘the invisible Obama field came down about
1/4 [of an inch]‘ into what should technically have been the Romney
area”
Funny how this “glitch” only benefited Obama while stealing votes from
Romney. I wonder how many other “glitches” were out there and how big
a role they played in Obama’s “victory”.
No incumbent president in the last 60 years has won reelection
with the unemployment rate as high as it currently is. The only way
left for the Democrats to keep Obama in office was to steal the
election. Obama failed to win ANY states with photo ID laws for
voters, but he did win all the swing states which require no voter ID.
Add to this electronic “glitches” that gave Obama votes meant for
Romney, and it’s pretty obvious what happened on November 6th, 2012.
We just became a Third World country.
In Chicago, Obama shows his ID before voting. (Illinois has no Voter
ID Law.) (See Obama voting video here.)
* New voter ID law has not yet been implemented; state presently has
no voter ID law in effect.
** New voter ID law has not yet been implemented; an older voter ID
law remains in effect.
In Alabama, South Carolina and Texas, current non-photo voter ID
laws stay in effect for the time being. The new photo voter ID
requirements will take effect after receiving preclearance under
Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. South Carolina and Texas were
denied pre-clearance in December 2011 and March 2012, respectively.
Alabama’s new photo ID law has a 2014 effective date, and the state
has not yet applied for pre-clearance. The Texas law was recently
denied pre-clearance by a federal court in D.C.; a similar court is
currently considering South Carolina’s law.
Wisconsin’s voter ID law was declared unconstitutional on March
12, 2012. Dane County Circuit Judge Richard Niess issued a permanent
injunction barring enforcement of the law, which the state has said it
will appeal. Read the March 6 injunction and the March 12 injunction.
There are some who prefer to call Oklahoma a photo voter ID state,
because most voters will show a photo ID before voting. However,
Oklahoma law also permits a voter registration card issued by the
appropriate county elections board to serve as proof of identity in
lieu of photo ID.
Rhode Island’s voter ID law takes effect in two stages. The first
stage, requiring a non-photo ID, took effect on January 1, 2012. On
January 1, 2014, a photo ID requirement will replace the non-photo ID
law.
Alabama’s new photo ID requirement takes effect with the 2014
statewide primary election. The new law also requires preclearance.
The delayed implementation date was intended to ensure that the timing
of preclearance did not occur between the primary and general
elections of 2012, thus creating voter confusion.
Mississippi’s new voter ID law was passed via the citizen
initiative process. However, the language in constitutional amendment
passed by MS voters on Nov. 8 is very general, and implementing
legislation will be required before the amendment can take effect. The
MS provision will also require pre-clearance under Section 5 of the
Voting Rights Act before it can take effect.
A state judge temporarily blocked enforcement of Pennsylvania’s
new voter ID law. It will not be in effect for the November 2012
election, and a trial on its permanent status will begin after the
election.
Gray Guest
Nov 10, 2012, 5:42:50 PM11/10/12
to
Gunner <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:e5dt98599abjd5jun...@4ax.com:
And did you notice how the UN onservers didn't observe any irregularities?
Things that make you say hmmm.
--
Refusenik #1
Libs suffer from Eleutherophobia. And there is no cure.
Obama called the SEALs and THEY got bin Laden. When the SEALs called Obama,
THEY GOT DENIED. Fuck Obama
news:e5dt98599abjd5jun...@4ax.com:
Things that make you say hmmm.
--
Refusenik #1
Libs suffer from Eleutherophobia. And there is no cure.
Obama called the SEALs and THEY got bin Laden. When the SEALs called Obama,
THEY GOT DENIED. Fuck Obama
Paul K. Dickman
Nov 10, 2012, 7:09:21 PM11/10/12
to
"Gunner" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e5dt98599abjd5jun...@4ax.com...
> Well, now we know why they filed them. They needed to steal the vote
> in certain key states so that Obama could be reelected.
>
> A list of closely contested state elections
> with no voter ID, which narrowly went to Obama include:
>
> Minnesota (10),
> Iowa (6),
> Wisconsin (10),
> Nevada (6),
> Colorado (9),
> New Mexico (5) and,
> Pennsylvania (20).
>
Here's another fine load of crap.
> with no voter ID, which narrowly went to Obama include:
>
> Minnesota (10),
> Iowa (6),
> Wisconsin (10),
> Nevada (6),
> Colorado (9),
> New Mexico (5) and,
> Pennsylvania (20).
>
Those states "which narrowly went to Obama " went to Obama, but not
narrowly.
He won those states by an average margin of %6.3 and over a million votes.
More votes, in fact than the total votes in either Nevada or New Mexico.
He won New Mexico by a margin of %9.9.
In order to do that by in person voter fraud, they would have to put 81
fictitious voters into each and every polling place in New Mexico.
I've been to New Mexico and I can guarantee that there are polling places
that don't have even 150 genuine voters.
You lost fair and square. Acting batshit crazy isn't gonna help.
Paul K. Dickman
"it's the bees and spiders again...they stole my food stamps and sold 'em to
the rats! I try to go down to my car fo' to honk the horn fo' hep but the
snakes has gotten it for the cockaroaches; I go back upstairs but the
spiders has jammed the police lock! I ain't been inside fo' a week, and I
know dat my wife is sleepin' with the bees!"
Gunner
Nov 10, 2012, 8:24:56 PM11/10/12
to
Turns out that a flip of 179,000 votes in four states, and Romney
would have won.
"AP’s exit poll data showing 42% of those polled reported being
positively influenced to vote for Obama based on his purported stellar
handling of the emergency response to the storm,... "
"Because this U.S. presidential election was a two person race, a
takeaway by one candidate from another represents a two vote swing.
Accordingly, if somewhere in the order of 26,000 Floridians, out of
8.3 million, decided that they were changing their vote from Romney to
Obama based on his supposed “heckuva job” in relation to the storm
response, those voters alone decided Florida’s 29 electoral votes.
Given the AP exit poll and its 42% figure for those who claimed the
storm influenced their decision to vote for Obama, it’s safe to say
that Superstorm Sandy threw far more than 26,000 voters into Obama’s
column and out of Romney’s.
The same argument can be made in Ohio. 5.3 million votes cast, margin
of victory: 103,000. If the storm flipped about 52,000 votes or more
from Romney to Obama, then no storm meant Ohio would have been a
Romney win on election day.
In Virginia, 3.7 million votes cast, margin of victory: 107,000. If
the storm influenced 54,000 voters or more to abandon Romney for
Obama, the storm was decisive in converting a Romney win in Virginia
to an Obama win.
In Colorado, nearly 2.4 million votes cast, margin of victory:
113,000. If 57,000 voters or more moved from the Romney camp to the
Obama camp based on the storm, then Obama doesn’t win the state if the
storm never happens."
State total Margin Margin percent
Florida 8,300,000 52,000 0.63%
Ohio 5,300,000 103,000 1.94%
Virginia 3,700,000 107,000 2.89%
Colorado 2,400,000 113,000 4.71%
totals 19,700,000 375,000 1.90%
It was a squeaker, and Barry should be thanking Sandy and Chris
Christie for the photo-op.
And Christie can kiss his chances at higher office goodbye. At least
from the Republican side of the house."
Now...once the voter fraud has been addressed...it may leave the
Nation with some serious issues to resolve. If discovered voter fraud
overturns the election...whatever will we do?
Paul K. Dickman
Nov 10, 2012, 9:34:57 PM11/10/12
to
news:0gvt98phi3ecgtdvo...@4ax.com...
So what your are saying is, that if a 179,000 democrats were republicans,
(and in the right place) things would have been different?
What the fuck does that have to do with voter fraud. That's called losing.
If you want to win, go out and change their minds.
> It was a squeaker, and Barry should be thanking Sandy and Chris
> Christie for the photo-op.
>
That is not a squeaker 537 votes in Fla was a squeaker.
If 268 Florida republicans were democrats, BushII would have lost to Gore.
Whining about 358,000 votes in four states, and calling that close, that is
just being a crybaby.
Paul K. Dickman
(and in the right place) things would have been different?
What the fuck does that have to do with voter fraud. That's called losing.
If you want to win, go out and change their minds.
> It was a squeaker, and Barry should be thanking Sandy and Chris
> Christie for the photo-op.
>
If 268 Florida republicans were democrats, BushII would have lost to Gore.
Whining about 358,000 votes in four states, and calling that close, that is
just being a crybaby.
Paul K. Dickman
Gunner
Nov 10, 2012, 10:47:19 PM11/10/12
to
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:34:57 -0600, "Paul K. Dickman"
Odd..you certainly dont appear to be that stupid. If there are
179,001 fraudulant votes discovered in the next few months....the
vote..and the Electoral College votes that represent them...go to
....Romney.
Gonna put a hell of a crimp on the election celebrations and really
screw up the court calenders for some time..dont you think?
<VBG>
But then..you Leftwingers never thought about that did you?
Just like you didnt realize that blaming the last president..for the
ever increasing failure of America..only gets the blame pointed at
your Obamassiah. <VBG>
You were pretty stupid..you should have let Romney win...so when
America implodes..you guys could have blamed it on him. Not
annnnnymmoooorrrrre. Laugh laugh laugh!
Now the destruction of America..can be blamed on one person, and one
political party.
And the People are not...not going to treat you well. Hundreds of
thousands of Democrats bailed and became Independants over the last 4
yrs...to escape the buffoonery of the Leftwing Fringe Kook Extremists
you have hooked your wagon to.
They were pretty smart, in a low cunning way. <VBG>
>> It was a squeaker, and Barry should be thanking Sandy and Chris
>> Christie for the photo-op.
>>
>
>That is not a squeaker 537 votes in Fla was a squeaker.
>If 268 Florida republicans were democrats, BushII would have lost to Gore.
>
>Whining about 358,000 votes in four states, and calling that close, that is
>just being a crybaby.
Sorry Comrade..but thats......174,001 votes
In states ripe with voter fraud. Now the big question is...will
174,001 fraudulant votes be discovered?
I think they can do it. <VBG> Lets keep our fingers crossed shall
we? Oh..no...I dont expect you to hope for that....you will be on the
List unfortunately..but way way way down. So Id not worry about it for
a few months after the bloodshed starts.
We do indeed, live in interesting times...dont we?
<VBG>
Gunner
>
>
>Paul K. Dickman
179,001 fraudulant votes discovered in the next few months....the
vote..and the Electoral College votes that represent them...go to
....Romney.
Gonna put a hell of a crimp on the election celebrations and really
screw up the court calenders for some time..dont you think?
<VBG>
But then..you Leftwingers never thought about that did you?
Just like you didnt realize that blaming the last president..for the
ever increasing failure of America..only gets the blame pointed at
your Obamassiah. <VBG>
You were pretty stupid..you should have let Romney win...so when
America implodes..you guys could have blamed it on him. Not
annnnnymmoooorrrrre. Laugh laugh laugh!
Now the destruction of America..can be blamed on one person, and one
political party.
And the People are not...not going to treat you well. Hundreds of
thousands of Democrats bailed and became Independants over the last 4
yrs...to escape the buffoonery of the Leftwing Fringe Kook Extremists
you have hooked your wagon to.
They were pretty smart, in a low cunning way. <VBG>
>> It was a squeaker, and Barry should be thanking Sandy and Chris
>> Christie for the photo-op.
>>
>
>That is not a squeaker 537 votes in Fla was a squeaker.
>If 268 Florida republicans were democrats, BushII would have lost to Gore.
>
>Whining about 358,000 votes in four states, and calling that close, that is
>just being a crybaby.
In states ripe with voter fraud. Now the big question is...will
174,001 fraudulant votes be discovered?
I think they can do it. <VBG> Lets keep our fingers crossed shall
we? Oh..no...I dont expect you to hope for that....you will be on the
List unfortunately..but way way way down. So Id not worry about it for
a few months after the bloodshed starts.
We do indeed, live in interesting times...dont we?
<VBG>
Gunner
>
>
>Paul K. Dickman
Paul K. Dickman
Nov 10, 2012, 11:19:38 PM11/10/12
to
news:l97u989hov0jfv4p2...@4ax.com...
Which grade school class did you flunk, math or reading.
The article stated that the 179,000 votes in those states would have to
"flip" or switch from democratic votes to republican votes in order to
fulfill his fantasy.
Here I'll quote it for you:
"Turns out that a flip of 179,000 votes in four states, and Romney would
have won."
And
" If the storm influenced 54,000 voters or more to abandon Romney for Obama,
the storm was decisive in converting a Romney win in Virginia to an Obama
win."
Simply negating 179,000 would still leave you losing by 179,000.
Read above the above, crybaby. It's 358,000.
Paul K. Dickman
The article stated that the 179,000 votes in those states would have to
"flip" or switch from democratic votes to republican votes in order to
fulfill his fantasy.
Here I'll quote it for you:
"Turns out that a flip of 179,000 votes in four states, and Romney would
have won."
" If the storm influenced 54,000 voters or more to abandon Romney for Obama,
the storm was decisive in converting a Romney win in Virginia to an Obama
win."
Paul K. Dickman
Why are people so cruel
Nov 11, 2012, 12:44:43 AM11/11/12
to
>> By The American Third Position
>>
>> November 7 | Was the election stolen? Remember all those lawsuits by
>> Democrats demanding that any voter identification laws be repealed.
>> Well, now we know why they filed them. They needed to steal the vote
>> in certain key states so that Obama could be reelected.
>>
I think that the UN needs to supervise ballots in the US to make sure
>>
>> November 7 | Was the election stolen? Remember all those lawsuits by
>> Democrats demanding that any voter identification laws be repealed.
>> Well, now we know why they filed them. They needed to steal the vote
>> in certain key states so that Obama could be reelected.
>>
they are fair, or use the Russians who have plenty of experience on
how elections can be rigged.
Until you get compulsory voting and registration you only have 25% of
a democracy. At least with compulsory voting you get the government
you deserve.
Gunner
Nov 11, 2012, 4:56:08 AM11/11/12
to
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 22:19:38 -0600, "Paul K. Dickman"
Depends on if those were simply fraudulant..or switched votes doesnt
it?
How many people hit the screen for Romney..but the vote went to Obama?
By all reports..a tremendous number did. Want the cites? Id be more
than happy to present them to you.
<VBG>
You hooked your wagon to the political party with hundreds of ward
healers and power brokers all going or already in jail for voting
fraud...and you have no fear that it will happen again?
<VBG>
You really are a funny little man.
Snerk!
Gunner
it?
How many people hit the screen for Romney..but the vote went to Obama?
By all reports..a tremendous number did. Want the cites? Id be more
than happy to present them to you.
<VBG>
You hooked your wagon to the political party with hundreds of ward
healers and power brokers all going or already in jail for voting
fraud...and you have no fear that it will happen again?
<VBG>
You really are a funny little man.
Snerk!
Gunner
Gunner
Nov 11, 2012, 4:56:38 AM11/11/12
to
Gunner
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 8:27:16 AM11/11/12
to
>Gunner <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 15:44:43 +1000, "Why are people so cruel"
><noon...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>>>> By The American Third Position
>>>>
>>>> November 7 | Was the election stolen? Remember all those lawsuits by
>>>> Democrats demanding that any voter identification laws be repealed.
>>>> Well, now we know why they filed them. They needed to steal the vote
>>>> in certain key states so that Obama could be reelected.
>>>>
>>
>>I think that the UN needs to supervise ballots in the US to make sure
>>they are fair, or use the Russians who have plenty of experience on
>>how elections can be rigged.
>>
>>Until you get compulsory voting and registration you only have 25% of
>>a democracy. At least with compulsory voting you get the government
>>you deserve.
>
>
>All you need..is photo Id.
Funny how I need a license AND background check to exercise one right,
but not another.
>On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 15:44:43 +1000, "Why are people so cruel"
><noon...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>>>> By The American Third Position
>>>>
>>>> November 7 | Was the election stolen? Remember all those lawsuits by
>>>> Democrats demanding that any voter identification laws be repealed.
>>>> Well, now we know why they filed them. They needed to steal the vote
>>>> in certain key states so that Obama could be reelected.
>>>>
>>
>>I think that the UN needs to supervise ballots in the US to make sure
>>they are fair, or use the Russians who have plenty of experience on
>>how elections can be rigged.
>>
>>Until you get compulsory voting and registration you only have 25% of
>>a democracy. At least with compulsory voting you get the government
>>you deserve.
>
>
>All you need..is photo Id.
but not another.
Gray Guest
Nov 11, 2012, 1:19:40 PM11/11/12
to
"Why are people so cruel" <noon...@microsoft.com> wrote in news:hXGns.836
$1k5...@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com:
Yeah, compulsory voting. Isn't that what they used in commie countries and
dictatorships to give the illusion of legitimacy?
It is amazing to me how few people actually get what's wrong.
$1k5...@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com:
dictatorships to give the illusion of legitimacy?
It is amazing to me how few people actually get what's wrong.
RD Sandman
Nov 11, 2012, 1:28:27 PM11/11/12
to
"Why are people so cruel" <noon...@microsoft.com> wrote in
news:hXGns.836$1k5...@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com:
news:hXGns.836$1k5...@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com:
--
Democracy means that anyone can grow up to be President,
And anyone who doesn't grow up can be Vice President.
Sleep well, tonight.....
RD (The Sandman)
RD Sandman
Nov 11, 2012, 1:31:14 PM11/11/12
to
"Paul K. Dickman" <pkdi...@ameritech.net> wrote in
news:k7n2t...@news4.newsguy.com:
And if Gore had won his home state of Tennessee, he would have been
president and Florida would have been a historical footnote.
> Whining about 358,000 votes in four states, and calling that close,
> that is just being a crybaby.
>
>
> Paul K. Dickman
>
>
>
news:k7n2t...@news4.newsguy.com:
president and Florida would have been a historical footnote.
> Whining about 358,000 votes in four states, and calling that close,
> that is just being a crybaby.
>
>
> Paul K. Dickman
>
>
>
Tom Swift Sr.
Nov 11, 2012, 1:42:54 PM11/11/12
to
On Nov 10, 7:12 am, walt tonne <tonnewalt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> One day he will be regarded as a hero.
Just like the vast majority of people today regard the Nazi's as
> One day he will be regarded as a hero.
heroes.
K00K-K00!
Gray Guest
Nov 11, 2012, 1:43:36 PM11/11/12
to
RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote in
news:XnsA10874BA0...@216.196.121.131:
> "Why are people so cruel" <noon...@microsoft.com> wrote in
> news:hXGns.836$1k5...@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com:
>
>>>> By The American Third Position
>>>>
>>>> November 7 | Was the election stolen? Remember all those lawsuits by
>>>> Democrats demanding that any voter identification laws be repealed.
>>>> Well, now we know why they filed them. They needed to steal the vote
>>>> in certain key states so that Obama could be reelected.
>>>>
>>
>> I think that the UN needs to supervise ballots in the US to make sure
>> they are fair, or use the Russians who have plenty of experience on
>> how elections can be rigged.
>>
>> Until you get compulsory voting and registration you only have 25% of
>> a democracy. At least with compulsory voting you get the government
>> you deserve.
>>
>
> We get the government we deserve with voting just the way it is.
>
I didn't vote for "this" government and I goddamn don't deserve it.
Unfortunately those that need to be punished in order to get smarter will
punish everyone else along with them.
I am resigned to the fact that there will be civil unrest. I see it as a
chance to get a little revenge. After all, Obama endorses revenge as a
reason for voting.
news:XnsA10874BA0...@216.196.121.131:
> "Why are people so cruel" <noon...@microsoft.com> wrote in
> news:hXGns.836$1k5...@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com:
>
>>>> By The American Third Position
>>>>
>>>> November 7 | Was the election stolen? Remember all those lawsuits by
>>>> Democrats demanding that any voter identification laws be repealed.
>>>> Well, now we know why they filed them. They needed to steal the vote
>>>> in certain key states so that Obama could be reelected.
>>>>
>>
>> I think that the UN needs to supervise ballots in the US to make sure
>> they are fair, or use the Russians who have plenty of experience on
>> how elections can be rigged.
>>
>> Until you get compulsory voting and registration you only have 25% of
>> a democracy. At least with compulsory voting you get the government
>> you deserve.
>>
>
> We get the government we deserve with voting just the way it is.
>
Unfortunately those that need to be punished in order to get smarter will
punish everyone else along with them.
I am resigned to the fact that there will be civil unrest. I see it as a
chance to get a little revenge. After all, Obama endorses revenge as a
reason for voting.
RD Sandman
Nov 11, 2012, 3:34:22 PM11/11/12
to
Gray Guest <No_email...@wahoo.com> wrote in
news:XnsA1088BA328D71We...@88.198.244.100:
> RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote in
> news:XnsA10874BA0...@216.196.121.131:
>
>> "Why are people so cruel" <noon...@microsoft.com> wrote in
>> news:hXGns.836$1k5...@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com:
>>
>>>>> By The American Third Position
>>>>>
>>>>> November 7 | Was the election stolen? Remember all those lawsuits
>>>>> by Democrats demanding that any voter identification laws be
>>>>> repealed. Well, now we know why they filed them. They needed to
>>>>> steal the vote in certain key states so that Obama could be
>>>>> reelected.
>>>>>
>>>
>>> I think that the UN needs to supervise ballots in the US to make
>>> sure they are fair, or use the Russians who have plenty of
>>> experience on how elections can be rigged.
>>>
>>> Until you get compulsory voting and registration you only have 25%
>>> of a democracy. At least with compulsory voting you get the
>>> government you deserve.
>>>
>>
>> We get the government we deserve with voting just the way it is.
>>
>
> I didn't vote for "this" government and I goddamn don't deserve it.
We have a country where over half the population is eligible to vote.
Eligible voters equal 208 million. With a population of 304 million,
that's about 68%. When only 119 million (57% of eligible voters) of them
actually do, it indicates a lot of ignorance and apathy. That means that
in a close election less than 30% (61 million voted for Obama/total
number of eligible electorate - 208 million) of our electorate actually
voted for the winner. When one side (whichever one that is) loses an
election because of even lower turnout than the other side, that is why
the election was lost. IOW, both sides got the government they deserved
because they didn't get the vote out. In this election, the popular vote
difference between Obama and Romney was about 3 million votes nationwide.
That is only about 2.5% of the electorate.
> Unfortunately those that need to be punished in order to get smarter
> will punish everyone else along with them.
True. Those would be the ones on your side who didn't care enough to
vote. Or the ones who didn't care for your candidate enough to defeat
the opposition.
news:XnsA1088BA328D71We...@88.198.244.100:
> RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote in
> news:XnsA10874BA0...@216.196.121.131:
>
>> "Why are people so cruel" <noon...@microsoft.com> wrote in
>> news:hXGns.836$1k5...@viwinnwfe01.internal.bigpond.com:
>>
>>>>> By The American Third Position
>>>>>
>>>>> November 7 | Was the election stolen? Remember all those lawsuits
>>>>> by Democrats demanding that any voter identification laws be
>>>>> repealed. Well, now we know why they filed them. They needed to
>>>>> steal the vote in certain key states so that Obama could be
>>>>> reelected.
>>>>>
>>>
>>> I think that the UN needs to supervise ballots in the US to make
>>> sure they are fair, or use the Russians who have plenty of
>>> experience on how elections can be rigged.
>>>
>>> Until you get compulsory voting and registration you only have 25%
>>> of a democracy. At least with compulsory voting you get the
>>> government you deserve.
>>>
>>
>> We get the government we deserve with voting just the way it is.
>>
>
> I didn't vote for "this" government and I goddamn don't deserve it.
Eligible voters equal 208 million. With a population of 304 million,
that's about 68%. When only 119 million (57% of eligible voters) of them
actually do, it indicates a lot of ignorance and apathy. That means that
in a close election less than 30% (61 million voted for Obama/total
number of eligible electorate - 208 million) of our electorate actually
voted for the winner. When one side (whichever one that is) loses an
election because of even lower turnout than the other side, that is why
the election was lost. IOW, both sides got the government they deserved
because they didn't get the vote out. In this election, the popular vote
difference between Obama and Romney was about 3 million votes nationwide.
That is only about 2.5% of the electorate.
> Unfortunately those that need to be punished in order to get smarter
> will punish everyone else along with them.
vote. Or the ones who didn't care for your candidate enough to defeat
the opposition.
Gunner
Nov 11, 2012, 3:40:01 PM11/11/12
to
Fascinating!!
Well..they both were/are Socialists..so thats hardly surprising.
Delbert Hurt-Lombardi
Nov 11, 2012, 5:45:47 PM11/11/12
to
Real name Fwanklin. Fwanklin is a famous homo. Fwanklin's 15 seconds
of fame came at a Star Trek Convention when he embarrassed the
audience, embarrassed America, embarrassed humanity and embarrassed
Gene Roddenberry by asking why Star Trek didn't have any faggot
characters. Fwanklin, after many beatings, has become just another
cock-slapped usenet zoo monkey. Liars, once they have been exposed,
frequently revert to behavior most similar to a zoo monkey who sits in
the cage throwing feces at passersby but saying nothing of value.
Franklin Hummel - Age 57, born May 1953
18 Linwood St, Unit 3
Boston, Massachusetts 02119-1543
(617) 541-3834
E-mail: hum...@world.std.com
Possible Fag Butt-Buddy: Arnold D Thomas (Age 52)
Franklin Hummel - Supervisor
Boston Public Library
700 Boylston Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
(617) 536-5400
(617) 536-3813 Fax
www.bpl.org
http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Hummel_Franklin_61179943.aspx
[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"
[Courtesy of Buster Norris]
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:12:26 -0700 (PDT), "Tom Swift Sr."
<thomas.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-candy-crowley-debate-fact-check-libya-20121017,0,5685665.story
>"Wednesday morning on CNN, Candy Crowley defended her moderation of
>Tuesday’s presidential debate -- and in particular, her on-the-spot
>fact-checking of Mitt Romney’s claims about President Obama’s response
>to the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya.
>During the debate, Romney alleged that Obama had taken weeks to
>describe the incident as a terrorist act. Crowley intervened, saying
>that the president “did in fact” call the attack an “act of terror” in
>his comments the following day and encouraging Romney to move on."
>This IS what Obama said that day:
>"No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation,
>alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we
>stand
>for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best
>of
>the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to
>see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake,
>justice will be done."
>So Romney was, in fact, *WRONG*
LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The quote "No acts of terror will ever..." is about 9/11/01 and NOT
ABOUT LIBYA.....................
"Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we
marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks. We mourned with the
families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who
made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed
grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank
you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then
last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.
As Americans, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only
sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to
stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it. Our
country is only as strong as the character of our people and the
service of those both civilian and military who represent us around
the globe.
No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation,
alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand
for.................
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/watercooler/2012/oct/16/green-factcheck-obama-did-not-call-benghazi-act-te/print/
Posted from:
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/
of fame came at a Star Trek Convention when he embarrassed the
audience, embarrassed America, embarrassed humanity and embarrassed
Gene Roddenberry by asking why Star Trek didn't have any faggot
characters. Fwanklin, after many beatings, has become just another
cock-slapped usenet zoo monkey. Liars, once they have been exposed,
frequently revert to behavior most similar to a zoo monkey who sits in
the cage throwing feces at passersby but saying nothing of value.
Franklin Hummel - Age 57, born May 1953
18 Linwood St, Unit 3
Boston, Massachusetts 02119-1543
(617) 541-3834
E-mail: hum...@world.std.com
Possible Fag Butt-Buddy: Arnold D Thomas (Age 52)
Franklin Hummel - Supervisor
Boston Public Library
700 Boylston Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02116
(617) 536-5400
(617) 536-3813 Fax
www.bpl.org
http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Hummel_Franklin_61179943.aspx
[][][][][][]
The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"
[Courtesy of Buster Norris]
On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:12:26 -0700 (PDT), "Tom Swift Sr."
<thomas.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-candy-crowley-debate-fact-check-libya-20121017,0,5685665.story
>"Wednesday morning on CNN, Candy Crowley defended her moderation of
>Tuesday’s presidential debate -- and in particular, her on-the-spot
>fact-checking of Mitt Romney’s claims about President Obama’s response
>to the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya.
>During the debate, Romney alleged that Obama had taken weeks to
>describe the incident as a terrorist act. Crowley intervened, saying
>that the president “did in fact” call the attack an “act of terror” in
>his comments the following day and encouraging Romney to move on."
>This IS what Obama said that day:
>"No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation,
>alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we
>stand
>for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best
>of
>the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to
>see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake,
>justice will be done."
>So Romney was, in fact, *WRONG*
LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The quote "No acts of terror will ever..." is about 9/11/01 and NOT
ABOUT LIBYA.....................
"Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we
marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks. We mourned with the
families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who
made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed
grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank
you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then
last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.
As Americans, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only
sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to
stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it. Our
country is only as strong as the character of our people and the
service of those both civilian and military who represent us around
the globe.
No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation,
alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand
for.................
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/watercooler/2012/oct/16/green-factcheck-obama-did-not-call-benghazi-act-te/print/
Posted from:
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/
Gray Guest
Nov 11, 2012, 10:00:30 PM11/11/12
to
RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote in
news:XnsA1088A13A...@216.196.121.131:
difference line of crap is going to be missing teeth.
Gunner
Nov 11, 2012, 10:14:08 PM11/11/12
to
President Barack Obama's Complete List of Historic Firsts [Updated]
Yes, he's historic, alright.
Law and Justice
• First President to Violate the War Powers Act (Unilaterally
Executing American Military Operations in Libya Without Informing
Congress In the Required Time Period - Source: Huffington Post)
• First President to Triple the Number of Warrantless Wiretaps of
U.S. Citizens (Source: ACLU)
• First President to Sign into Law a Bill That Permits the
Government to "Hold Anyone Suspected of Being Associated With
Terrorism Indefinitely, Without Any Form of Due Process. No
Indictment. No Judge or Jury. No Evidence. No Trial. Just an
Indefinite Jail Sentence" (NDAA Bill - Source: Business Insider.)
• First President to Have His Attorney General Held in Criminal
Contempt of Congress For His Efforts to Cover Up Operation Fast and
Furious, That Killed Over 300 Individuals (Source: Politico)
• First President to claim Executive Privilege to shield a sitting
Attorney General from a Contempt of Congress finding for perjury and
withholding evidence from lawful subpoenas (Source: Business Insider)
• First President to Issue Unlawful "Recess-Appointments" Over a
Long Weekend -- While the U.S. Senate Remained in Session (against the
advice of his own Justice Department - Source: Heritage Foundation)
• First President to Fire an Inspector General of Americorps for
Catching One of His Friends in a Corruption Case (Source: Gawker)
• First President to "Order a Secret Amnesty Program that Stopped
the Deportations of Illegal Immigrants Across the U.S., Including
Those With Criminal Convictions" (Source: DHS documents uncovered by
Judicial Watch)
• First President to Sue States for Enforcing Voter ID
Requirements, Which Were Previously Ruled Legal by the U.S. Supreme
Court (Source: CNN)
• First President to Encourage Racial Discrimination and
Intimidation at Polling Places (the New Black Panthers voter
intimidation case, Source: Investors Business Daily)
• First President to Refuse to Comply With a House Oversight
Committee Subpoena (Source: Heritage Foundation)
• First President to Arbitrarily Declare an Existing Law
Unconstitutional and Refuse to Enforce It (Defense of Marriage Act -
Source: ABC News)
• First President to Demand a Company Hand Over $20 Billion to One
of His Political Appointees (BP Oil Spill Relief Fund - Source: Fox
News)
• First President to Have a Law Signed By an 'Auto-pen' Without
Being "Present" (Source: The New York Times)
• First President to Have His Administration Fund an Organization
Tied to the Cop-Killing Terrorist Group, the Weather Underground
(Source: National Review)
Scandals
• First President to publicly announce an enemies list (consisting
of his opponents campaign contributors; and to use the
instrumentalities of government to punish those on the list - Source:
Heritage Foundation)
• First President to Attempt to Block Legally-Required 60-Day
Layoff Notices by Government Contractors Due to His Own Cuts to
Defense Spending -- Because The Notices Would Occur Before the
Election. (Source: National Journal)
• First President to Intentionally Disable Credit Card Security
Measures (in order to allow over-the-limit donations, foreign
contributions and other illegal fundraising measures - Source: Power
Line)
• First President to send 80 percent of a $16 billion program
(green energy) to his campaign bundlers and contributors, leaving only
20% to those who did not contribute. (Source: Washington Examiner)
• First President to Propose an Executive Order Demanding
Companies Disclose Their Political Contributions to Bid on Government
Contracts (Source: Wall Street Journal)
• First President to issue an Executive Order implementing a
"Racial Justice System", a system that tries to achieve "racially
equivalent outcomes" for crimes (Source: Daily Caller)
• First President to Send Millions in Taxpayer Dollars to His
Wife's Former Employer (Source: White House Dossier)
Economy
• First President to Preside Over a Cut to the Credit Rating of
the United States Government (Source: Reuters)
• First President to Bypass Congress and Implement the DREAM Act
Through Executive Fiat (Source: Christian Science Monitor)
• First President to Move America Past the Dependency Tipping
Point, In Which 51% of Households Now Pay No Income Taxes (Source:
Center for Individual Freedom)
• First President to Increase Food Stamp Spending By More Than
100% in Less Than Four Years (Source: Sen. Jeff Sessions)
• First President to Spend a Trillion Dollars on 'Shovel-Ready'
Jobs -- and Later Admit There Was No Such Thing as Shovel-Ready Jobs
(Source: President Obama during an early meeting of his 'Jobs
Council')
• First President to Threaten Insurance Companies After They
Publicly Spoke out on How Obamacare Helped Cause their Rate Increases
(Source: The Hill)
• First President to Abrogate Bankruptcy Law to Turn Over Control
of Companies to His Union Supporters (Source: Wall Street Journal)
• First President to Propose Budgets So Unreasonable That Not a
Single Representative From Either Party Would Cast a Vote in Favor
(Sources: The Hill, Open Market)
• First President Whose Economic Policies Have the Number of
Americans on Disability Exceed the Population of New York (Source: CNS
News)
• First President to Sign a Law Requiring All Americans to
Purchase a Product From a Third Party (Source: Wall Street Journal)
• First President to Sue States For Enforcing Immigration Laws
Passed by Congress (Source: The Arizona Republic newspaper)
• First President to See America Lose Its Status as the World's
Largest Economy (Source: Peterson Institute)
• First President to redistribute $26.5 billion of the taxpayers'
funds to his union supporters in the UAW (Source: Heritage Foundation)
• First President to Threaten an Auto Company (Ford) After It
Publicly Mocked Bailouts of GM and Chrysler (Source: Detroit News)
• First President to Attempt to Bully a Major Manufacturing
Company Into Not Opening a Factory in a Right-to-Work State (Boeing's
facility in South Carolina - Source: Wall Street Journal)
Energy Policy
• First President to Endanger the Stability of the Electric Grid
by Shutting Down Hundreds of Coal-Fired Plants Without Adequate
Replacement Technologies (Source: National Electric Reliability
Corporation - PDF)
• First President to Have His EPA Repudiated by a Federal Judge
for "Overstepping Its Powers" When They Attempted to Shut Down Coal
Operations in Appalachia (Source: Huffington Post)
• First President to be Held in Contempt of Court for Illegally
Obstructing Oil Drilling in the Gulf of Mexico (Source: Politico)
National Security and World Affairs
• First President to Lie Repeatedly to the American People About
the Murder of a U.S. Ambassador and Three Other Diplomatic Personnel
for Purely Political Reasons (Source: Roger Simon)
• First President to Openly Defy a Congressional Order Not To
Share Sensitive Nuclear Defense Secrets With the Russian Government
(Sources: ABC News, Rep. Michael Turner)
• First President to Leak Highly Classified Military and
Intelligence Secrets to Hollywood In Order to Promote a Movie That
Could Help His Reelection Campaign (Source: Judicial Watch)
• First President to Terminate America's Ability to Put a Man into
Space (Sources: USA Today, ABC News)
• First President to press for a "treaty giving a U.N. body veto
power over the use of our territorial waters and rights to half of all
offshore oil revenue" (The Law Of The Sea Treaty, Source: Investors
Business Daily)
• First President to send $200 million to a terrorist organization
(Hamas) after Congress had explicitly frozen the money for fear it
would fund attacks against civilians (Sources: American Thinker, The
Independent [UK])
Miscellania
• First President to Insert Himself into White House Biographies
of Past Presidents (Source: The New York Times).
• First President to Golf 105 or More Times in His First
Three-and-a-half Years in Office (Source: The Hill)
But remember: he will not rest until all Americans have jobs,
affordable homes, green-energy vehicles, and the environment is
repaired, etc., etc., etc.
RD Sandman
Nov 12, 2012, 11:46:28 AM11/12/12
to
Gray Guest <No_email...@wahoo.com> wrote in
news:XnsA108DFE45EA4BWe...@88.198.244.100:
differences between the two.......apparently, not enough, however, to
fire up the conservative base.
Message has been deleted
Gray Guest
Nov 12, 2012, 1:09:33 PM11/12/12
to
RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote in
news:XnsA109636FF...@216.196.121.131:
better.
I didn't much care for Romney either. Certainly my idea of a President is
considerably furhter to the right tnan him.
But like Bush, he turned out to be a decent, honorable man. Certainly
better than the trash we are afflicted with now.
RD Sandman
Nov 12, 2012, 1:21:39 PM11/12/12
to
Deucalion <som...@nowhere.net> wrote in
news:abc2a8d6idft45rbd...@4ax.com:
> Now you know that there's not a dime's worth of difference between the
> two major political parties. ;-)
>
You believe that is true on Hispanics, immigration, black culture,
women's issues, etc..?
news:abc2a8d6idft45rbd...@4ax.com:
> two major political parties. ;-)
>
You believe that is true on Hispanics, immigration, black culture,
women's issues, etc..?
Gray Guest
Nov 12, 2012, 2:18:24 PM11/12/12
to
RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote in
news:XnsA10973930...@216.196.121.131:
moochers.
RD Sandman
Nov 12, 2012, 2:46:16 PM11/12/12
to
Gray Guest <No_email...@wahoo.com> wrote in
news:XnsA109918E45F15We...@88.198.244.100:
Gray Guest
Nov 12, 2012, 6:39:39 PM11/12/12
to
RD Sandman <rdsandman[spamremove]@comcast.net> wrote in
news:XnsA10981EBD...@216.196.121.131:
Michael A. Terrell
Nov 12, 2012, 6:47:47 PM11/12/12
to
Gray Guest wrote:
>
> Maybe conservative white males should stop supporting and defensing the
> moochers.
countries.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
0 new messages