Nazi/Neo-Nazis Insane?=Bring Disaster on Our Species
repo
THE NAZI RELIGION RESURFACES IN SATANIC RITUAL MURDER *PIC*
National Socialism: The Leviathan Reappears
"We come now to the Nazi movement, which is, in its possibilities of
destruction, the most urgent challenge the human mind will ever have
to face. Nazi Germany may well bring down conclusive disaster on our
species", wrote H.G. Wells in The Fate Of Man, 1939. About Adolph
Hitler, he said "he shows all the symptoms of a recognized form of sex
mania, the jealous fear and hate".
However, as Wells adds, "insanity has its advantages as well as its
handicaps. It involves an abnormal concentration of purpose and
nervous energy. In its phase of mania it abolishes or at least defers
fatigue and sustains long spells of sleepless vigilance and
penetrating distrust far beyond the compass of the normal man."
"The Nazi movement, or something essentially like it," wrote Wells in
Chapter Fifteen, titled 'The Nazi Religion', "was inevitable." And he
provides the "why ?" of this statement.
National Socialism in Germany became inevitable "because [Germany] had
a greater surplus of young people without reasonable hope of life than
any other country in the world. They had no colonies to go to, no
great business enterprises to develop; no employment of any sort.
There you have the primary conditions for a desperate outbreak." What
Wells did not add in this paragraph, but which he examined elsewhere,
is the fact that these "young people," meaning mostly young men in
post-war Germany, had been well-educated or were still in the
educational system there when National Socialism took hold. Beginning
in the 1930 local elections, the Nazi leadership recruited these
jobless young men and their middle-class parents, according to William
Sheridan Allen.
Many other writers and students of National Socialism have attempted
to explain the hypnotic appeal of Adolph Hitler's brand of National
Socialism: but these ways of analysis almost never delve into the Nazi
fascination with the occult and with "mystical symbols"
Wells shows that National Socialism under Adolph Hitler and his
coterie of obsessive Organization Men, chose "to apply the conception
of the Chosen People to the Germanic world. The Nazi [party] took that
over in one magnificent plagiarism. The Slavic Prussians, the Alpine
Bavarians, the melange of Gothic and Celtic peoples in the Rhineland,
discovered that they were one, single, pure race of beautiful blonds.
They knew that in spite of appearances they had lovely, pure, blond
souls. They turned upon the Jews and all foreigners with the
completest paraphrase of the old Bible nationalism."
Wells writes that the National Socialist movement, and the Nazi
government, became "fundamentally Biblical [as] a militant Chosen
People." This is his way of expressing damnation and it is not,
repeat, not praise. Wells was most certainly an advocate of world-
around socialism, and democracy. And yet Wells must admit that
National Socialism was deeply dependent on, embedded with, "social
democracy."
The Nazi movement began by winning street battles against Communists
and left-wing socialists, and concluded its rise to power by winning
elections throughout Germany. Such are the vagaries of pure democracy,
and such are the risks in advocating "a Democracy" over any republican
form of limited and restricted governance. There is a message in that
for those Chickenhawks who are so assiduously preaching "democracy" to
the Shi'ite majority in Iraq.
H.G. Wells summarizes his view of what is to come, in this book from
1939, on the eve of a general European war, this way:
"The complete de-Christianization of the entire Reich, of southern as
of northern Germany, is, I think, the greater probability."
The Order of the Illuminati Masquerades Under The Swastika
Now step backwards in time, to the book written by Professor John
Robison in 1798, Proofs Of A Conspiracy -- and compare what Wells
wrote in The Fate Of Man, with Robison's judgement of Adam Weishaupt
and The Order of the Illuminati --
"... purity of heart and life is no part of the morality that is held
forth as the perfection of human nature. The final abolition of
Christianity is ... one of its objects."
Other writers and commentators have elaborated, very well, on the
masterful manipulation of images and imagery which characterizes the
modern regime of The Order of the Illuminati. Propaganda,
entertainment, and pop culture in particular, provide the basis of its
domination of the social-political alliance which is called "the New
World Order."
"Toughness is as much in the German tradition as it was in the
Spartans", wrote Wells. Recall now that Adam Weishaupt chose for
himself the moniker of "Spartacus", when he and others founded The
Order of the Illuminati in Germany. And what did Wells say about the
brutality of the Nazi movement, and of individual National Socialists
in greater Germania ?? He said that the Nazi "refuses to give way to
the horror of other people's torments, because from doing that ... it
is only a step to giving way to pain and fear himself."
Repo
> http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=32464
>
> THE NAZI RELIGION RESURFACES IN SATANIC RITUAL MURDER
Pure evil is what motivates White Supremacists who
murdered 28 Million Europeans 1940s. Stay away from
them.
lorad
> http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?read=32464
>
> THE NAZI RELIGION RESURFACES IN SATANIC RITUAL MURDER *PIC*
>
> National Socialism: The Leviathan Reappears
>
> "We come now to the Nazi movement, which is, in its possibilities of
> destruction, the most urgent challenge the human mind will ever have
> to face. Nazi Germany may well bring down conclusive disaster on our
> species", wrote H.G. Wells in The Fate Of Man, 1939. About Adolph
> Hitler, he said "he shows all the symptoms of a recognized form of sex
> mania, the jealous fear and hate".
Racist mexicans need to quit chewing that peyote and take a vacation
back in their mexican homeland.
The amorphous agglomeration of fatty tissues, hot air, and hubris better known as Rush Limbaugh
Racist Mexicans chew peyote? Can you please cite your source?
Topaz
National Socialism was a political party. Most of the members were
Christians.
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
Topaz
National Socialism was a political party. Most of the members were
Christians.
ADOLF HITLER
NUREMBERG
SPEECH OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1938
..National Socialism is not a cult-movement - a movement for worship;
it is exclusively a 'volkic' political doctrine based upon racial
principles. In its purpose there is no mystic cult, only the care and
leadership of a people defined by a common blood-relationship.
Therefore we have no rooms for worship, but only halls for the people
- no open spaces for worship, but spaces for assemblies and parades.
We have no religious retreats, but arenas for sports and
playing-fields, and the characteristic feature of our places of
assembly is not the mystical gloom of a cathedral, but the brightness
and light of a room or hall which combines beauty with fitness for its
purpose. In these halls no acts of worship are celebrated, they are
exclusively devoted to gatherings of the people of the kind which we
have come to know in the course of our long struggle; to such
gatherings we have become accustomed and we wish to maintain them. We
will not allow mystically-minded occult folk with a passion for
exploring the secrets of the world beyond to steal into our Movement.
Such folk are not National Socialists, but something else - in any
case, something which has nothing to do with us. At the head of our
program there stand no secret surmisings but clear-cut perception and
straightforward profession of belief. But since we set as the central
point of this perception and of this profession of belief the
maintenance and hence the security for the future of a being formed by
God, we thus serve the maintenance of a divine work and fulfill a
divine will - not in the secret twilight of a new house of worship,
but openly before the face of the Lord.
There were times when a half-light was the necessary condition for the
effectiveness of certain teachings: we live in an age when light is
for us the fundamental condition of successful action. It will be a
sorry day when through the stealing in of obscure mystic elements the
Movement or the State itself issues obscure commissions.... It is even
dangerous to issue any commission for a so-called place of worship,
for with the building will arise the necessity for thinking out
so-called religious recreations or religious rites, which have nothing
to do with National Socialism. Our worship is exclusively the
cultivation of the natural, and for that reason, because natural,
therefore God-willed. Our humility is the unconditional submission
before the divine laws of existence so far as they are known to us
men: it is to these we pay our respect. Our commandment is the
courageous fulfillment of the duties arising from those laws. But for
religious rites we are not the authorities, but the churches! If
anyone should believe that these tasks of ours are not enough for him,
that they do not correspond with his convictions, then it is for him
to prove that God desires to use him to change things for the better.
In no event can National Socialism or the National Socialist State
give to German art other tasks than those which accord with our view
of the world.
The only sphere in which the Jewish international newspapers still
today think that they can attack the new Reich is the cultural sphere.
Here they attempt, by a constant appeal to the sentimentality -
untroubled by any sort of knowledge - of the world-citizens of
democracy to bewail the downfall of German culture: in other words,
they lament the commercial closing-down of those elements which, as
the heralds and exponents of the November Republic, forced their
cultural characteristics, as unnatural as they were deplorable, upon
the period between the two Empires; and which have now played out
their role for good and all....
Fortunately, however, despite the short time which the National
Socialist leadership has been able to allot to works of culture,
positive facts, here too, speak louder than any negative criticism. We
Germans can today speak with justice of a new awakening of our
cultural life, which finds its confirmation not in mutual compliments
and literary phrases, but rather in positive evidences of cultural
creative force. German architecture, sculpture, painting, drama, and
the rest bring today documentary proof of a creative period in art,
which for richness and impetuosity has rarely been matched in the
course of human history. And although the Jewish-democratic press
magnates in their effrontery even today seek brazenly to turn these
facts upside down, we know that the cultural achievements of Germany
will in a few years have won from the world respect and appreciation
far more unstinted even than that which they now accord to our work in
the material field. The buildings which are arising in the Reich today
will speak a language that endures, a language, above all, more
compelling than the Yiddish gabblings of the democratic, international
judges of our culture. What the fingers of these poor wretches have
penned or are penning the world will - perhaps unfortunately - forget,
as it has forgotten so much else. But the gigantic works of the Third
Reich are a token of its cultural renascence and shall one day belong
to the inalienable cultural heritage of the Western world, just as the
great cultural achievements of this world in the past belong to us
today...
Topaz
During World War Two the Germans put Jews and Communists in
concentration camps. The USA locked also up the Japanese and their
political opponents and for less reason. At the end of the war there
was a lot of deaths in the German camps from disease and starvation
because Germany was being bombed to rubble. There is no evidence that
the Germans had gas chambers or an extermination plan.
Newsweek magazine May 15, 1989 says on page 64:
"the way the Nazis did things: the secrecy, the unwritten orders, the
destruction of records and the innocent-sounding code names for the
extermination of the Jews. Perhaps it was inevitable that historians
would quarrel over just what happened"
The real reason there are no records of an extermination plan is
because there was no extermination plan. The Germans planned to deport
the Jews out of Germany. The records show that they planned to move
them to Madagascar.
Here is part of the Leuchter Report:
"Thirty-one samples were selectively removed from the alleged gas
chambers at Kremas I, II, III, IV and V. A control sample was taken
from delousing facility #1 at Birkenau. The control sample was removed
from a delousing chamber in a location where cyanide was known to have
been used and was apparently present as blue staining. Chemical
testing of the control sample #32 showed a cyanide content of 1050
mg/kg, a very heavy concentration. The conditions at areas from which
these samples were taken are identical with those of the control
sample, cold, dark, and wet. Only Kremas IV and V differed, in the
respect that these locations had sunlight (the buildings have been
torn down) and sunlight may hasten the destruction of uncomplexed
cyanide. The cyanide combines with the iron in the mortar and brick
and becomes ferric-ferro-cyanide or prussian blue pigmentation, a very
stable iron-cyanide complex.
"The locations from which the analyzed samples were removed are set
out in Table III.
"It is notable that almost all the samples were negative and that the
few that were positive were very close to the detection level
(1mg/kg); 6.7 mg/kg at Krema III; 7.9 mg/kg at Krerma I. The absence
of any consequential readings at any of the tested locations as
compared to the control sample reading 1050 mg/kg supports the
evidence that these facilities were not execution gas chambers. The
small quantities detected would indicate that at some point these
buildings were deloused with Zyklon B - as were all the buildings at
all these facilities"
Professional holocaust believers have admitted that the "gas chamber"
which is shown to the tourists at Auschwitz was actually built by the
allies after the war was over. This is what they wrote:
Brian Harmon <har...@msg.ucsf.edu> wrote in article
<080620000051136373%har...@msg.ucsf.edu>...
"You're confusing Krema I with Kremas II-V. Krema I is a
reconstruction, this has never been a secret. Kremas II-V are in
their demolished state as they were left."
Charles Don Hall <cdhall...@erols.com> wrote in article
<8F4CB71B...@news.erols.com>...
"Certainly not! The word "fake" implies a deliberate attempt to
deceive.
"The staff of the Auschwitz museum will readily explain that the Nazis
tried to destroy the gas chambers in a futile attempt to conceal their
crimes. And they'll tell you that reconstruction was done later on. So
it would be dishonest for me to call it a "fake". I'll cheerfully
admit that it's a "reconstruction" if that makes you happy."
They admit that the "gas chamber" shown to the tourists at Auschwitz
was built by the allies after the war was over. There is no physical
evidence that the Germans had gas chambers. No bodies of people who
died from gas have been found. The Communists were the first to enter
the camps. How do the other allies know the Communists didn't blow up
the buildings? Then they could claim that these demolished buildings
used to be gas chambers.
But then the believers will say the Germans confessed. Their main
confession is from Hoess. Here are the details:
"In the introduction to Death Dealer [Buffalo: Prometheus, 1992], the
historian Steven Paskuly wrote: "Just after his capture in 1946, the
British Security Police were able to extract a statement from Hoess by
beating him and filling him with liquor." Paskuly was reiterating what
Rupert Butler and Bernard Clarke had already described.
In 1983, Rupert Butler published an unabashed memoir (Legions of
Death, Hamlyn: London) describing in graphic detail how, over three
days, he and Clarke and other British policemen managed to torture
Hoess into making a "coherent statement." According to Butler [Legions
of Death, p. 237], he and the other interrogators put the boots to
Hoess the moment he was captured. For starters, Clarke struck his face
four times to get H�ess to reveal his true identity.
<quote>
The admission suddenly unleashed the loathing of Jewish sergeants in
the arresting party whose parents had died in Auschwitz following an
order signed by H�ss.
The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pajamas ripped from his
body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where
it seemed to Clarke the blows and screams were endless.
Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: "Call them off,
unless you want to take back a corpse."
A blanket was thrown over H�ss and he was dragged to Clarke's car,
where the sergeant poured a substantial slug of whisky down his
throat. H�ss tried to sleep.
Clarke thrust his service stick under the man's eyelids and ordered in
Geffnan: "Keep your pig eyes open, you swine."
For the first time H�ss trotted out his oft-repeated justification: "I
took my orders from Himmler. I was a soldier in the same way as you
are a soldier and we had to obey orders."
The party arrived back at Heide around three in the morning. The snow
was swirling
still, but the blanket was torn from H�ss and he was made to walk
completely nude
through the prison yard to his cell.
</quote>
An article in the British newspaper Wrexham Leader [Mike Mason, "In a
cell with a Nazi war criminal-We kept him awake until he confessed,"
October 17, 1986] following the airing of a TV documentary on the case
of Rudolf Hoess included eyewitness recollections by Ken Jones:
<quote>
Mr. Ken Jones was then a private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery
stationed at
Heid[e] in Schleswig-Holstein. "They brought him to us when he
refused to
cooperate over questioning about his activities during the war. He
came in the winter
of 1945/6 and was put in a small jail cell in the barracks," recalls
Mr. Jones. Two
other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join H�ss in his cell
to help break
him down for interrogation. "We sat in the cell with him, night and
day, armed with
axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to
help break down
his resistance," said Mr. Jones. When H�ss was taken out for exercise
he was made
to wear only jeans and a cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three
days and
nights without sleep, H�ss finally broke down and made a full
confession to
the authorities.
</quote>
The confession Hoess signed was numbered document NO-1210; later
revamped, as document PS-3868, which became the basis for an oral
deposition Hoess made for the IMT on April 15, 1946, a month after it
had been extracted from him by torture...
Since what people confess to after they have been captured by the
Communists and their liberal comrades is not proof of anything, this
leaves only the stories of survivors. These contradict each other and
not believable. One professional survivor said that he could tell if
the Germans were gassing German Jews or Polish Jews by the color of
the smoke.
The fact that there are so many "survivors" is not proof of an
extermination plan. There may be six million survivors. Just about
every Jew that is old says he is a survivor.
The real "holocaust" was when the Communist Jews murdered millions of
Christians. Communism was Jewish. Here is proof:
Article Winston Churchill wrote in 1920:
"This movement amongst the Jews (the Russian Revolution) is not new.
From the days of Spartacus Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down
to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kuhn (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany)
and Emma Goldman (United States), this world wide conspiracy for the
overthrow of civilization and the reconstruction of society on the
basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible
equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer,
Mrs. Nesta Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part
in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of
every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at
last this band of extraordinary personalities has gripped the Russian
people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the
undisputed masters of that enormous empire. There is no need to
exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the
actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international
and for the most part atheistic Jews. Moreover, the principal
inspiration and driving power comes from Jewish leaders." (ibid)
Lev Trotzky wrote a book called "Stalin: An Appraisal of the Man and
His Influence", Harper Bros., New York and London, 1941, translated by
Charles Malamuth.
In this book he told who the principle members of the October Central
Committee were. This group was the leadership of the Bolshevik Party
during the October Revolution. This is what he wrote:
"In view of the Party's semi-legality the names of persons elected by
secret ballot were not announced at the Congress, with the exception
of the four who had received the largest number of votes. Lenin--133
out of a possible 134, Zinoviev--132, Kamenev--131, Trotzky--131."
Of these four top leaders of the Bolshevik Party the last three were
known Jews. Lenin was thought to be a gentile married to a Jewess. It
was later proven that he was one quarter Jewish, London Jewish
Chronicle April 21, 1995, Lenin: Life and Legacy.
David Francis, the American Ambassador to Russia at the time of the
Revolution, wrote:
"The Bolshevic leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of
whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country
but are internationalists and they are trying to start a world-wide
revolution."
The Director of British Intelligence to the U.S. Secretary of State
wrote this:
"There is now definite evidence that Bolshevism is an international
movement controlled by Jews."
In 1945 the FBI arrested six individuals for stealing 1700 highly
confidential documents from State Department files. This was the
Amerasia case they were:
Philip Jaffe, a Russian Jew who came to the U.S. in 1905. He was at
one time the editor of the communist paper "Labor Defense" and the
ringleader of the group arrested.
Andrew Roth, a Jew.
Mark Gayn, a Jew, changed his name from Julius Ginsberg.
John Service, a gentile.
Emmanuel Larsen, nationality unknown
Kate Mitchel, nationality unknown.
In 1949 the Jewess Judith Coplin was caught passing classified
documents from Justice Department files to a Russian agent.
The highest ranking communist brought to trial in the U.S. was Gerhart
Eisler. He was a Jew. He was the secret boss of the Communist Party
in the U.S. and commuted regularly between the U.S. and Russia.
In 1950 there was the "Hollywood Ten" case. Ten leading film writers
of the Hollywood Film Colony were convicted for contempt of Congress
and sentenced to prison. Nine of the ten were Jews. Six of the ten
were communist party members and the other four were flagrantly
pro-communist.
One of the top new stories of 1949 was the trial of Eugene Dennis and
the Convicted Eleven. This group comprised the National Secretariat of
the American Communist Party. Six were Jews, two gentiles, three
nationality unknown.
Also in 1949 the German-born atomic scientist Klaus Fuchs was
convicted for passing atomic secrets to the Russians. Acting on
information obtained from Fuchs the FBI arrested nine other members of
the ring. All of them were convicted. Eight of the nine were Jews.
Here are some quotes from a very pro-Jewish book that was first
published in 1925. The book is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis
Browne.
"But save for such exceptions, the Jews who led or participated in the
heroic efforts to remold the world of the last century, were neither
Reform or Orthodox. Indeed, they were often not professing Jews at
all.
"For instance, there was Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne, both
unfaltering champions of freedom. And even more conspicuously, there
was Karl Marx, one of the great prophetic geniuses of modern times.
"Jewish historians rarely mention the name of this man, Karl Marx,
though in his life and spirit he was far truer to the mission of
Israel than most of those who were forever talking of it. He was born
in Germany in 1818, and belonged to an old rabbinic family. He was not
himself reared as a Jew, however, but while still a child was baptized
a Christian by his father. Yet the rebel soul of the Jew flamed in him
throughout his days, for he was always a 'troubler' in Europe."
"Then, of course, there are Ludwig Borne and Heinrich Heine, two men
who by their merciless wit and sarcasm became leaders among the
revolutionary writers. Karl Marx, Ferdinand Lassalle, Johann Jacoby,
Gabriel Riesser, Adolphe Cremieux, Signora Nathan- all these of Jewish
lineage played important roles in the struggle that went throughout
Europe in this period. Wherever the war for human liberty was being
waged, whether in France, Germany, Austria, Hungary, or Italy, there
the Jew was to be found. It was little wonder that the enemies of
social progress, the monarchists and the Churchmen, came to speak of
the whole liberal movement as nothing but a Jewish plot."
The book "Soviet Russia and the Jews" by Gregor Aronson and published
by the American Jewish League Against Communism, quotes Stalin in an
interview in 1931 with the Jewish Telegraph Agency. Stalin said:
"...Communists cannot be anything but outspoken enemies of
Anti-Semitism. We fight anti-Semites by the strongest methods in the
Soviet Union. Active anti-Semites are punished by death under the
law."
The following quotes are taken directly from documents available from
the
U.S. Archives:
State Department document 861.00/1757 sent May 2, 1918 by U.S. consul
general in Moscow, Summers: "Jews prominent in local Soviet
government, anti-Jewish feeling growing among population...."
State Department document 861.00/2205 was sent from Vladivostok on
July 5, 1918 by U.S. consul Caldwell: "Fifty percent of Soviet
government in each town consists of Jews of the worst type."
From the Headquarters of the American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia on
March 1, 1919, comes this telegram from Omsk by Chief of Staff, Capt.
Montgomery Shuyler: "It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the
United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since it's
beginning, guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest
type" type."
A second Schuyler telegram, dated June 9, 1919 from Vladivostok,
reports on the make-up of the presiding Soviet government: "...(T)here
were 384 'commissars' including 2 negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen,
22 Armenians, AND MORE THAN 300 JEWS. Of the latter number, 264 had
come to Russia from the United States since the downfall of the
Imperial Government.
The Netherlands' ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, confirmed this:
"Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to
spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is
organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one
object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things."
"The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of
Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a
new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in
Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction
and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental an
physical forces, become a reality all over the world." (The American
Hebrew, September 10, 1920 "In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the
membership of the Soviet communist party was Jewish, though Jews
comprised only 1.8 percent of the total population." (Stuart Kahan,
The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)
Interestingly, one of the first acts by the Bolsheviks was to make
so-called "anti-Semitism" a capital crime. This is confirmed by Stalin
himself:
"National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic
customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as
an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of
cannibalism...under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the
death penalty." (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).
Here is a quote from Mein Kampf:
"Making an effort to overcome my natural reluctance, I tried to read
articles of this nature published in the Marxist Press; but in doing
so my aversion increased all the more. And then I set about learning
something of the people who wrote and published this mischievous
stuff. From the publisher downwards, all of them were Jews. I
recalled to mind the names of the public leaders of Marxism, and then
I realized that most of them belonged to the Chosen Race- the Social
Democratic representatives in the Imperial Cabinet as well as the
secretaries if the Trades Unions and the street agitators. Everywhere
the same sinister picture presented itself. I shall never forget the
row of names- Austerlitz, David, Adler, Ellonbogen, and others. One
fact became quite evident to me. It was that this alien race held in
its hands the leadership of that Social Democratic Party with whose
minor representatives I had been disputing for months past."
Solzhenitsyn named in his book the six top administrators of the
Soviet death camps. All six of them were Jews.
Here is something the National Socialists wrote:
"The Soviet Union was in fact a paradise for one group: the Jews. Even
at times when for foreign policy reasons Jews were less evident in the
government, or when they ruled through straw men, the Jews were always
visible in the middle and lower levels of the administration."
The amorphous agglomeration of fatty tissues, hot air, and hubris better known as Rush Limbaugh
> something that causes nausea.
Topaz is like some kind of Aryan superhero. Uberman. Topaz "Uberman"
Hitler.
Wherever people gather for discussion and debate, Uberman will be
there with his pro-Hitler/anti-nonwhites propaganda to slay the beast
of reason. Wherever the keywords white, black, brown, Chinese,
Mexican, Jew, Hitler, Nazi, Germany, American, the, a, tree, or any
other word, regardless of the content, Topaz "Uberman" Hitler will
post his irrelevant and long winded nazi propaganda.
His only weakness is we can ignore him.
Dave Heil
> National Socialism was a political party. Most of the members were
> Christians.
No, Topie, they were not. They might as well have claimed to have been
Martians.
Dave Heil
Dave Heil
>
> During World War Two the Germans put Jews and Communists in
> concentration camps. The USA locked also up the Japanese and their
> political opponents and for less reason.
The U.S. didn't line detainees up at the edge of a pit, shoot them and
cover them with a layer of lime.
The U.S. didn't gas detainees and put them into ovens for incineration.
> At the end of the war there
> was a lot of deaths in the German camps from disease and starvation
> because Germany was being bombed to rubble.
That was likely because Germany did not provide enough food, clothing,
soap, water or medical facilities.
Germany was bombed to rubble because she attacked her neighbors.
> There is no evidence that
> the Germans had gas chambers or an extermination plan.
There are mountains of evidence which confirm both. PBS ran a
documentary showing such evidence only last week.
Only a fool could attempt to deny the Holocaust.
Dave Heil
Michael Ejercito
> concentration camps.
> The USA locked also up the Japanese and their
> political opponents and for less reason.
And did NOT murder them.
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> National Socialism was a political party. Most of the members were
> Christians.
>
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> Christians.
>
As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.
You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know
you can not measure up.
You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.
You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.
You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
National
Socialism.
Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor
children as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent
adults in a consensually sexual
way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be
it a prepubescent
boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.
That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
honest about it.
Michael
Topaz
Here is a quote from an article by Julius Streicher in 1944:
Der St�rmer, #23/1944, What is Americanism
"The family ties between hundreds of thousands of German families and
their American relatives led many to think that America would never
join a second war against Germany. Now that that has happened, many
Germans still believe that America will never allow Bolshevism to
conquer and destroy Germany. Recent events have proven how false and
dangerous this idea is. One has to be be foolish or irredeemably
stupid to believe that anything good can come to Europe from the land
of presumed opportunity. That that did not happen after the First
World War, and will not happen after the second. The Jews have made
America what it is today: a nation raped by the Jews , a nation whose
130,000,000 people of many colors and races have been forced into
helping the Jews achieve world domination!"
Topaz
by Theodore J. O'Keefe
Nothing has been more effective in establishing the authenticity of
the Holocaust story in the minds of Americans than the terrible scenes
US troops discovered when they entered German concentration camps at
the close of World War II.
At Dachau, Buchenwald, Dora, Mauthausen, and other work and detention
camps, horrified US infantrymen encountered heaps of dead and dying
inmates, emaciated and diseased. Survivors told them hair-raising
stories of torture and slaughter, and backed up their claims by
showing the GIs crematory ovens, alleged execution gas chambers,
supposed implements of torture, and even shrunken heads and
lampshades, gloves, and handbags purportedly made from skin flayed
from dead inmates.
US government authorities, mindful that many Americans who remembered
the atrocity stories fed them during World War I still doubted the
Allied propaganda directed against the Hitler regime, resolved to
"document" what the GIs had found in the camps. Prominent newsmen
and politicians were flown in to see the harrowing evidence, while
the US Army Signal Corps filmed and photographed the scenes for
posterity. Famous journalist Edward R. Murrow reported, in tones of
horror, but no longer of disbelief, what he had been told and shown,
and Dachau and
Buchenwald were branded on the hearts and minds of the American
populace as names of infamy unmatched in the sad and bloody history
of this planet.
For Americans, what was "discovered" at the camps -- the dead and the
diseased, the terrible stories of the inmates, all the props of
torture and terror -- became the basis not simply of a transitory
propaganda campaign but of the conviction that, yes, it was true: the
Germans did exterminate six million Jews, most of them in lethal gas
chambers.
What the GIs found was used, by way of films that were mandatory
viewing for the vanquished populace of Germany, to "re-educate" the
German people by destroying their national pride and their will to a
united, independent national state, imposing in their place
overwhelming feelings of collective guilt and political impotence.
And when the testimony, and the verdict, of the Nuremberg Tribunal
incorporated most, if not all, of the horror stories Americans were
told about
Dachau, Buchenwald, and other places captured by the US Army, the
Holocaust could pass for one of the most documented, one of the most
authenticated, one of the most proven historical episodes in the
human record.
A Different Reality
But it is known today that, very soon after the liberation of the
camps, American authorities were aware that the real story of the
camps was quite different from the one in which they were coaching
military public information officers, government spokesmen,
politicians, journalists, and other mouthpieces.
When American and British forces overran western and central Germany
in the spring of 1945, they were followed by troops charged with
discovering and securing any evidence of German war crimes.
Among them was Dr. Charles Larson, one of America's leading forensic
pathologists, who was assigned to the US Army's Judge Advocate
General's Department. As part of a US War Crimes Investigation Team,
Dr. Larson performed autopsies at Dachau and some twenty other German
camps, examining on some days more than 100 corpses. After his grim
work at Dachau, he was
questioned for three days by US Army prosecutors.
Dr. Larson's findings? In an 1980 newspaper interview he said: "What
we've heard is that six million Jews were exterminated. Part of that
is a hoax." And what part was the hoax? Dr. Larson, who told his
biographer that to his knowledge he "was the only forensic pathologist
on duty in the entire European Theater" of Allied military operations,
confirmed that "never was a case of poison gas uncovered."
Typhus, Not Poison Gas
If not by gassing, how did the unfortunate victims at Dachau,
Buchenwald and Bergen-Belsen perish? Were they tortured to death or
deliberately starved? The answers to these questions are known as
well.
As Dr. Larson and other Allied medical men discovered, the chief
cause of death at Dachau, Belsen and the other camps was disease,
above all typhus, an old and terrible scourge of mankind that until
recently flourished in places where populations were crowded together
in circumstances where public health measures were unknown or had
broken down. Such was the case in the overcrowded internment camps in
Germany at war's end, where, despite such measures as systematic
delousing, quarantine of the sick and cremation of the dead, the
virtual
collapse of Germany's food, transport, and public health systems led
to catastrophe.
Perhaps the most authoritative statement of the facts as to typhus and
mortality in the camps has been made by Dr. John E. Gordon, M.D.,
Ph.D., a professor of preventive medicine and epidemiology at the
Harvard University School of Public Health, who was with US forces in
Germany in 1945. Dr. Gordon reported in 1948 that "The outbreaks in
concentration camps and prisons made up the great bulk of typhus
infection encountered in Germany." Dr. Gordon summarized the causes
for the outbreaks as follows:
Germany in the spring months of April and May [1945] was an
astounding sight, a mixture of humanity travelling this way and that,
homeless, often hungry and carrying typhus with them ...Germany was in
chaos. The destruction of whole cities and the path left by advancing
armies produced a disruption of living conditions contributing to the
spread of the disease. Sanitation was low grade, public utilities were
seriously disrupted, food supply and food distribution was poor,
housing was inadequate and order and discipline were everywhere
lacking. Still more important, a shifting of populations was occurring
such as few countries and few times have experienced.
Dr. Gordon's findings are corroborated by Dr. Russell Barton, today a
psychiatrist of international repute, who entered Bergen-Belsen with
British forces as a young medical student in 1945. Barton, who
volunteered to care for the diseased survivors, testified under sworn
oath in a Toronto courtroom in 1985 that "Thousands of prisoners who
died at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp during World War II
weren't deliberately starved to death but died from a rash of
diseases."
Dr. Barton further testified that on entering the camp he had credited
stories of deliberate starvation but decided such stories were untrue
after inspecting the well equipped kitchens and the meticulously
maintained ledgers, dating back to 1942, of food cooked and dispensed
each day.
Despite noisily publicized claims and widespread popular notions to
the contrary, no researcher has been able to document a German policy
of extermination through starvation in the German camps.
No 'Human Skin' Lampshades
What of the ghoulish stories of concentration camp inmates skinned for
their tattoos, flayed to make lampshades and handbags, or other
artifacts? What of the innumerable "torture racks," "meathooks,"
whipping posts, gallows, and other tools of torment and death that are
reported to have abounded at every German camp? These allegations, and
even more grotesque ones proffered by Soviet prosecutors, found their
way into the record at Nuremberg.
The lampshade and tattooed-skin charges were made against Ilse Koch,
dubbed by journalists the "Bitch of Buchenwald," who was reported to
have furnished her house with objects manufactured from the tanned
hides of luckless inmates.
But General Lucius Clay, military governor of the US zone of occupied
Germany, who reviewed her case in 1948, told his superiors in
Washington: "There is no convincing evidence that she [Ilse Koch]
selected inmates for extermination in order to secure tattooed skins
or that she possessed any articles made of human skin." In an
interview General Clay gave years later, he stated about the material
for the infamous lampshades: "Well, it turned out actually that it was
goat flesh. But
at the trial it was still human flesh. It was almost impossible for
her to have gotten a fair trial." Ilse Koch hanged herself in a German
jail in 1967.
It would be tedious to itemize and refute the thousands of bizarre
claims as to Nazi atrocities. That there were instances of German
cruelty, however, is clear from the testimony of Dr. Konrad Morgen, a
legal investigator attached to the Reich Criminal Police, whose
statements on the witness stand at Nuremberg have never been
challenged by proponents of the Jewish Holocaust story. Dr. Morgen
informed the court that he had been given full authority by Heinrich
Himmler,
commander of Hitler's SS and the dread Gestapo, to enter any German
concentration camp and investigate instances of cruelty and corruption
on the part of camp personnel. As he explained in sworn testimony at
Nuremberg, Dr. Morgen investigated 800 such cases, resulting in more
than 200 convictions. Punishments included the death penalty for the
worst offenders, including Hermann Florstedt, commandant of Lublin
(Majdanek), and Karl Koch (Ilse's husband), commandant of Buchenwald.
While German camp commandants in certain cases did inflict physical
punishment, such acts had to be approved by authorities in Berlin, and
it was required that a camp physician first certify the good health of
the prisoner to be disciplined, and then be on hand at the actual
beating. After all, throughout most of the war the camps were
important centers of industrial activity. The good health and morale
of the prisoners was critical to the German war effort, as is
evidenced in a January 1943 order issued by SS General Richard Gl�cks,
chief of the office that supervised the
concentration camps. It held the camp commanders "personally
responsible for exhausting every possibility to preserve the physical
strength of the detainees." Camp Survivors: Merely Victims?
US Army investigators, working at Buchenwald and other camps, quickly
ascertained what was common knowledge among veteran inmates: that the
worst offenders, the cruelest denizens of the camps, were not the
guards but the prisoners themselves. Common criminals of the same
stripe as those who populate US prisons today committed many
villainies, particularly when they held positions of authority, and
fanatical Communists, highly organized to combat their many
political enemies among the inmates, eliminated their foes with
Stalinist ruthlessness. Two US Army investigators at Buchenwald, Egon
W. Fleck and Edward A. Tenenbaum, carefully investigated circumstances
in the camp before its liberation. In a detailed report submitted to
their superiors, they revealed, in the words of Alfred Toombs, their
commander, who wrote a preface to the report, "how the prisoners
themselves organized a deadly terror within the Nazi terror."
Fleck and Tenenbaum described the power exercised by criminals and
Communists as follows:
The trusties, who in time became almost exclusively Communist
Germans, had the power of life and death over all other inmates. They
could sentence a man or a group to almost certain death ... The
Communist trusties were directly responsible for a large part of the
brutalities at Buchenwald.
Colonel Donald B. Robinson, chief historian of the American military
government in Germany, summarized the Fleck-Tenenbaum report in an
article published in an American magazine shortly after the war.
Colonel Robinson wrote succinctly of the American investigators'
findings: "It appeared that the prisoners who agreed with the
Communists ate; those who didn't starved to death."
Additional corroboration of inmate brutality has been provided by
Ellis E. Spackman, who, as Chief of Counter-Intelligence Arrests and
Detentions for the US Seventh Army, was involved in the liberation of
Dachau. Spackman, later a professor of history at San Bernardino
Valley College in California, wrote in 1966 that at Dachau "the
prisoners were the actual instruments that inflicted the barbarities
on their fellow prisoners."
'Gas Chambers'
In December 1944 US Army officers Colonel Paul Kirk and Lt. Colonel
Edward J. Gully inspected the German concentration camp at
Struthof-Natzweiler in Alsace. They submitted their findings to their
superiors at the headquarters of the US 6th Army Group, which
subsequently forwarded their report to the US War Crimes Division.
While, significantly, the full text of their report has never been
published, it has been revealed, by a historian supportive of
Holocaust claims, that the two investigators were careful to
characterize equipment exhibited to them by French informants as a
"so-called lethal gas chamber," and to claim it was "allegedly used as
a lethal gas chamber." (Emphasis added)
Both the careful phraseology of the Natzweiler report, and its
effective suppression, stand in stark contrast to the credulity, the
confusion, and the blaring publicity that accompanied official reports
of alleged gas chambers at Dachau. At first, a US Army photo depicting
a GI gazing at a steel door marked with a skull and crossbones and the
German words for: "Caution! Gas! Mortal danger! Don't open!," was
identified as showing the murder weapon.
Later, however, it was evidently decided that the apparatus in
question was merely a standard delousing chamber for clothing, and
another alleged gas chamber, this one cunningly disguised as a shower
room, was exhibited to American congressmen and journalists as the
site where thousands breathed their last. While there exist numerous
reports in the press as to the operation of this second "gas chamber,"
no official report by trained Army investigators has yet surfaced to
reconcile such problems as the function of the shower heads: Were they
"dummies," or did lethal cyanide gas stream through them? (Each theory
has appreciable support in journalistic and
historiographical literature.)
As with Dachau, so with Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen, and the other camps
liberated by the Allies in western Germany. There was no end of
propaganda about "gas chambers," "gas ovens," and the like, but so far
not a single detailed description of the murder weapon and its
function, not a single report of the kind that is mandatory for the
successful prosecution of any assault or murder case in America at
that time and today, has come to light.
Furthermore, a number of Holocaust authorities have now publicly
decreed that there were no gassings, no extermination camps in Germany
after all. (We are now told that "gassing" and "extermination" camps
were located exclusively in what is now Poland, in areas captured by
the Soviet Red Army and made off-limits to western investigators.)
Dr. Martin Broszat of the Munich-based Institute for Contemporary
History, which is funded by the German government, stated
categorically in a 1960 letter to the German weekly Die Zeit: "Neither
in Dachau nor in Bergen-Belsen nor in Buchenwald were Jews or other
prisoners gassed." Professional "Nazi hunter" Simon Wiesenthal stated
in 1975 and again in 1993 that "there were no
extermination camps on German soil."
Dachau "gas chamber" No. 2, which was once presented to a stunned and
grieving world as a weapon that claimed hundreds of thousands of
lives, is now described in the brochure issued to tourists at the
modern Dachau "memorial site" in these words: "This gas chamber,
camouflaged as a shower room, was not used."
The Propaganda Intensifies
More than 50 years after American troops entered Dachau, Buchenwald
and other German camps, and trained American investigators established
the facts as to what had gone on in them, the government in
Washington, the entertainment media in Hollywood, and the print media
in New York continue to churn out millions of words and images
annually on the horrors of the camps and the infamy of the Holocaust.
Despite the fact that, with the exception of the defeated Confederacy,
no enemy of America has ever so suffered so complete and devastating
defeat as did Germany in 1945, the mass media and the politicians and
bureaucrats behave as if Hitler, his troops, and his concentration
camps continue to exist in an eternal present, and our opinion makers
continue to distort, through ignorance or malice, the facts about the
camps.
Time for the Truth
It is time that the government and the professional historians reveal
the facts about Dachau, Buchenwald and the other camps. It is time
they let the American public know how the inmates died, and how they
didn't die. It is time that the claims of mass murder by gassing are
clarified and investigated in the same manner as any other claims of
murder. It is time that the free ride certain groups have enjoyed as
the result of unchallenged Holocaust claims be terminated, just as it
is time to end the scapegoating of other groups, including Germans,
eastern Europeans, the
Roman Catholic hierarchy, and the wartime leadership of America and
Britain, either for their alleged role in the Holocaust or their
supposed failure to stop it.
Above all, it is time that the citizens of this great Republic have
the facts about the camps, facts they have a right to know, a right
that is fundamental to the exercise of their authority and their will
in the governance of their country. As citizens and as taxpayers,
Americans of all ethnic backgrounds, of all faiths, have a basic right
and an overriding interest in determining the facts of incidents that
are deemed by those in positions of power to be significant in
determining America's foreign and educational policy, as well as its
selection of past events to be memorialized in our
civic life.
Today the alleged facts of the Holocaust are at issue all over the
civilized world. The truth will be decided only by recourse to the
facts, in the public forum: not by concealing the facts, denying the
truth, stonewalling reality. The truth will out, and it is time the
government of this country, and governments and international bodies
throughout the world, make public the evidence of what actually
transpired in the German concentration camps in the years 1933-1945,
so that we may put paid to the lies, without fear or favor, and carry
out the work of reconciliation and renewal that is and must be the
granite foundation of mutual tolerance between peoples and of a peace
based on justice.
Summary
The conclusions of the early US Army investigations as to the truth
about the wartime German concentration camps have since been
corroborated by all subsequent investigators and can be summarized:
1.The harrowing scenes of dead and dying inmates were not the result
of a German policy of "extermination," but rather the result of
epidemics of typhus and other disease brought about largely by the
effects of Allied aerial attacks.
2.Stories of Nazi supercriminals and sadists who turned Jews and
others into handbags and lampshades for their private profit or
amusement were sick lies or diseased fantasies; indeed, the German
authorities punished corruption and cruelty on the part of camp
commanders and guards.
3.On the other hand, portrayals of the newly liberated inmates as
saints and martyrs of Hitlerism were quite often very far from the
truth; indeed, most of the brutalities inflicted on camp detainees
were the work of their fellow prisoners, in contravention of German
policy and German orders.
4.The alleged homicidal showers and gas chambers were used either for
bathing camp inmates or delousing their clothes; the claim that they
were used to murder Jews or other human beings is a contemptible
fabrication. Orthodox historians and professional "Nazi-hunters" have
quietly dropped claims that inmates were gassed at Dachau, Buchenwald
and other camps in Germany. They continue, however, to keep silent
regarding the lies about Dachau and Buchenwald, as well as to evade an
open discussion of the evidence for homicidal gassing at Auschwitz and
the
other camps captured by the Soviets.
Institute For Historical Review
Post Office Box 2739
Newport Beach, California 92659
Topaz
Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of
political power and banned them from the legal profession. Germany
went from devastating economic poverty in 1932 to full employment just
a couple years later. If an incredible economic improvement can be
achieved, merely by removing the Jews from power (and replacing them
with patriotic nationalists), then every Gentile nation in the world
should give this a try.
Obviously the Jews don't want anyone else getting the idea of removing
them to create prosperity. The Jews control the mass media in most
Western countries. Most people don't know about the Balfour
Declaration. During World War One, Zionist Jews offered to use their
control of the press to bring America into World War One if Britain
would promise them Palestine. This offer was dubbed the Balfour
Declaration. If the Jews had enough media control and influence to
push America into World War One in 1917, what else have they done with
their power?
It was a huge embarrassment for the Jews to see Germany so prosperous
in the mid-1930s after removing them from power. They considered this
a dangerous precedent. To deal with this "problem" the Jewish World
Congress declared war on Germany in 1933. This declaration of war at
least encouraged a world-wide boycott against Germany and at worst
encouraged other nations of the world to become hostile toward
Germany. (The Jews curiously sanctioned the Germans before the Germans
passed any laws restricting the Jews.) More importantly the Jews
pushed vicious anti-German slander in all the Jewish-owned newspapers
in the West in the years leading up to World War Two. The Communist
mass murder of 30 million people in Russia and the Ukraine received
almost no publicity in the Jewish media. Most people in the West only
heard a serious mention of these Communist mass murders beginning in
the 1980s. Instead, the Jewish media focused all their hatred and
agitation against Germany and its allies.
After six years of relentless agitation, the Jews pushed England and
France into war with Germany. Only two years later, FDR and his cabal
of Jews provoked a war with Japan (and Germany).
Naturally, the Jews did not want future historians to say: "World War
Two was provoked by the Jewish media in retaliation for Germany
removing the Jews from power." The Jews needed a new reason for World
War Two. A reason that painted their enemies as unquestionably evil.
So they invented the Holocaust.
The Holocaust stood mostly unchallenged for decades after the war
because people feared being branded "Nazi-sympathizers" for
questioning its details. The truth always comes out in the long run.
Professor Arthur Butz published his famous work "The Hoax of the 20th
Century" in 1977 detailing a very solid argument against this war
propaganda. Dr. Butz pointed out that the world population of Jews
remained at about 16 million before and after the war. He also noted
that half a million Jews remained in Paris after four years of German
occupation. Both these facts strongly suggest the Holocaust is a
fraud, but the political power of the Jews has suppressed and punished
any public questioning of the Holocaust to this day. David Irving
joined the ranks of Revisionist historians several years ago and went
from a famous successful author to a pariah thanks to persecution by
the Jews.
The Institute for Historical Review has done great work exposing the
Holocaust as a great historical fraud. Anyone interested in looking
for historical truth should visit their website. It's a shock for many
people to see how much propaganda we've been force fed.
Topaz
Anyone can buy Martin Luther's book "The Jews and their Lies" on
Amazon.com and see what he said about Jews.
When Martin Luther was asked whether it is morally justifiable to box
the ears of a Jew , he said " Certainly, I for one would smack him on
the jaw . Were I able, I would knock him down and stab him in my
anger . It is lawful , according to both the human and the divine law
, to kill a robber ; then it is even more permissible to slay a
blasphemer ".
" If I had to baptize a Jew , I would take him to the bridge of the
Elbe , hang a stone round his neck and push him over with the words '
I baptize thee in the name of Abraham'".
" We ought to take revenge on the Jews and kill them ".
" It is our own fault that we have not avenged the sacred blood of our
Savior and the innocent blood of countless Christians and children,
spoiled since the demolition of Jerusalem until now; it is our own
fault that we have not annihilated the Jews but placidly let them stay
where they are in spite of all their murders, their curses,
blasphemies, lies, violations, and that we even protect their schools,
their dwellings, their persons and property."
" The Jews deserve to be hanged on gallows seven times higher than
ordinary thieves ".
" Set fire to their synagogues and schools ; and what will not burn ,
heap earth over it so that no man may see a stone or relic of them
forever ".
Topaz
Here is part of a speech by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, delivered in
Nuernberg on September 13th, 1935 at the Seventh National-Socialist
Party Congress:
"Almost without exception, the intellectual leaders of Marxist atheism
in Germany were Jews, among them being Erich Weinert, Felix Abraham,
Dr. Levy-Lenz and others. At regular meetings, held in the presence of
a notary public, members were requested to register their declaration
of withdrawal from their church for a fee of 2 Marks. And this the
fight for atheism was carried on. Between 1918 and 1933 the
withdrawals from the German Evangelical Churches alone amounted to
two-and-a-half million persons in Germany. The programme which these
atheistic societies laid down in regard to sexual matters is amply
charcterized in the following demands publicly expressed at meetings
and distributed in leaflet form:
1) The complete abrogation of the paragraphs of the law dealing with
the crime of abortion, and the right to have abortion procured free of
charge in State Hospitals.
2) Non-interference with prostitution.
3) The abrogation of all bourgeois-capitalistic regulations in regard
to marriage and divorce.
4) Official registration to be optional and the children to be
educated by the community.
5) Abrogation of all penalties for sexual perversities and amnesty to
be granted to all persons condemned as 'sexual criminals'.
"Truly a case of methodical insanity, which has for its aim the
wilful destruction of the nations and their civilization and the
substitute of barbarism as a fundamental principle of public life.
"Where are the men behind the scenes of this virulent world
movement? Who are the inventors of all this madness? Who transplanted
this ensemble into Russia and is today making the attempt to have it
prevail in other countries? The answer to these question discloses the
actual secret of our anti-Jewish policy and our uncomromising fight
against Jewry; for the Bolshevic International is in reality nothing
less than a Jewish International."
Topaz
Here is a quote from "The Battle for Berlin" by Joseph Goebbels:
We had no idea of the danger that threatened us then. I myself did not
yet know Marxism well enough to foresee the possible consequences. I
shrugged my shoulders as I read the dark prose of the red press and
awaited expectantly the decisive evening.
Around 8 p.m. we drove in an old rusty car from the city center to
Wedding. A cold gray mist hung under a starless sky. Our hearts were
bursting with impatience and expectation.
As we drove down M�llerstra�e it was already clear that the evening
did not bode well. Groups of dark figures stood on every street
corner. They apparently planned to teach our party members a bloody
lesson before they even got to the meeting.
Dark masses of people stood outside the Pharus Hall, expressing their
rage and hate with loud and impudent threats.
The leader of the protective forces cleared a way for us and reported
briefly that the hall had been packed since 7:15 p.m. and had been
closed by police. About two-thirds of the audience were Red Front
Fighters. That was what we wanted. There would be a decision. We were
ready to give it all we had.
Entering the hall, we encountered a warm, stiffling aroma of beer and
tobacco. The hall was hot. A lively roar of voices filled the hall.
People were packed in tightly. We reached the podium only with
difficulty.
No sooner was I recognized than hundreds of voices filled with rage
and revenge thundered in my ears: "Bloodhound! Murder of Workers!"
Those were the mildest words they shouted. But a welcoming group of
some party members and S.A. Men answered with passion. Excited battle
cries sounded from the platform. I saw immediately that we were a
minority, but a minority determined to fight, and therefore win.
It was still our custom then for an S.A. leader to chair all of the
party's public meetings. Here too. Tall as a tree he stood up front
and asked for silence with his upraised arm. That was easier said than
done. Mocking laughter was the answer. Insults flew toward the
platform from every corner of the room. People growled and screamed
and raged. There were world revolutionaries scattered about who
apparently had gained the courage they needed by drinking. It was
impossible to quiet the hall. The class-conscious proletariat had not
come to discuss but to fight, to break things up, to put an end to the
Fascist specter with callused workers' fists.
We were not uncertain, even for a moment. We also knew that if the
enemy did not succeed this time in what he had threatened, the future
success of the movement in Berlin was assured.
Fifteen or twenty S.A. and S.S. men stood before the platform in
uniforms and arm bands, an impudent and direct provocation to the Red
Front Fighters. Behind me was a select group of reliable people ready
at any moment to risk their lives to defend me from the onrushing red
mob with brutal force.
The Communists made an obvious mistake in their tactics. They had
scattered small groups throughout the hall, but clumped most of the
rest in the right rear of the hall. I recognized immediately that
there was the center of unrest, and if anything was to be done, we
first had to deal ruthlessly with them. Whenever the chair tried to
open the meeting, a dark chap stood up on a stool and shouted "Point
of Order!" Hundreds of others yelled the same after him.
If one takes from the mass their leader or also their seducer, they
are leaderless and easily controlled. Our tactic therefore was to
silence this cowardly troublemaker at any cost. He felt secure back
there, surrounded by his comrades. We tried to do this peacefully a
few times. The chair shouted over the uproar: "There will be
discussion afterward! But we determine the rules of order!"
That was an ineffective attempt at an unsuitable object. The screamer
wanted to throw the meeting into confusion by his endless shouts and
bring things to the boiling point. Then a general melee would result.
As our efforts to bring the meeting to order peacefully proved
unsuccessful, I took the head of the defensive forces to the side, and
immediately after groups of his men slipped through the thundering
Communist masses. Before the astonished and surprised Red Front troops
realized what was happening, our comrades had hauled the troublemaker
down from his stool and brought him through the raging crowd to the
podium. That was unexpected, but what followed was no surprise. A beer
glass flew through the air and crashed to the floor. That was the
signal for the first major meeting hall battle. Chairs were broken and
legs ripped from tables. Glasses and bottles suddenly appeared and all
hell broke loose. The battle raged for ten minutes. Glasses, bottles,
table and chair legs flew randomly through the air. A deafening roar
rose; the red beast was set free and wanted its victims.
At first it looked as if we were lost. The Communist attack was sudden
and explosive, completely unexpected. But soon the S.A. and S.S. men
distributed throughout the hall and in front of the platform recovered
from their surprise and counterattacked with bold courage. It quickly
became clear that although the Communist Party had masses behind it,
these masses became cowards when faced with a firmly disciplined and
determined opponent. They ran. In short order the red mob that had
come to break up our meeting had been driven from the hall. The order
that could not be secured by good will was gained by brute force.
Usually one is not aware of the stages of a meeting hall battle. Only
later does one recall them. I still remember a scene that I will never
forget; on the podium stood a young S.A. man whom I did not know. He
was hurling his missiles into the on-coming red mob. Suddenly a beer
glass thrown from the distance hit him on the head. A wide stream of
blood ran down his face. He sank with a cry. After a few seconds he
stood up again, grabbed water bottle from the table and threw it into
the hall, where it clattered against the head of an opponent.
The face of this young man is engraved in my memory. This
lightening-fast moment is unforgettable. This gravely-wounded S.A. man
would soon, and indeed for all times, become my most reliable and
loyal comrade.
Only after the red mob had been driven howling, growling and cursing
from the field could one tell how serious and costly the battle had
been. Ten lay in their blood on the platform, most with head injuries,
two with severe concussions. The table and stairs to the platform were
covered in blood. The whole hall resembled a field of ruins.
In the midst of this bloody and ruined wasteland, our tree-high S.A.
leader resumed his place and declared with iron calm: "The meeting
will continue. The speaker has the floor."
Never before or since have I spoken under such dramatic conditions.
Behind me, groaning in pain and bleeding, were seriously injured S.A.
comrades. Around me were broken chair legs, shattered beer glasses and
blood. The whole meeting was icily silent.
We lacked then a medical corps. Since we were in a proletarian
district, we had to have our seriously wounded carried out by
so-called worker volunteers. There were scenes outdoors of
unimaginable inhumanity. The bestial people who were supposedly
fighting for universal brotherhood insulted our poor and defenseless
injured with phases like: "Isn't that pig dead yet?"
Under such conditions it was impossible to give a coherent speech.
Scarcely had I begun to speak when another group of volunteers entered
the hall to carry off a seriously wounded S.A. man on a stretcher. One
of them, encountering the brutal apostles of humanity outside the door
and their unflattering and crude language, shouted for me in
desperation. His voice could be heard loudly and unmistakably on the
platform I interrupted my speech and went through the hall, where
there were still scattered Communist commando groups. Still surprised
by what had happened, they stood quietly and shyly to the side. I bade
farewell to the seriously wounded S.A. comrades.
Michael Ejercito
> Here is a quote from "The Battle for Berlin" by Joseph Goebbels:
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> Nuernberg on September 13th, 1935 at the Seventh National-Socialist
> Party Congress:
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> by James Buchanan
>
> Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of
> political power and banned them from the legal profession. Germany
> went from devastating economic poverty in 1932 to full employment just
> a couple years later. If an incredible economic improvement can be
> achieved, merely by removing the Jews from power (and replacing them
> with patriotic nationalists), then every Gentile nation in the world
> should give this a try.
And of course, in the end, most of Europe was in ruins.
Michael
lorad
replace american culture with a mexican one?
Who are these traitors?
repo
Along with 6 Million Jews, White Supremacists wiped out
20 Million Non Jews; maybe that may account for the decrease
in the white population in Europe
David Eduardo
"lorad" <lora...@cs.com> wrote in message
news:31ce7f17-3a99-4c65...@u10g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...
> Why should ANY american allow a foreign nation to invade the US and
> replace american culture with a mexican one?
>
> Who are these traitors?
>
What is "American Culture?"
Hint: it is the mix of the cultures of all the different peoples who have
immigrated here over several centuries.
Michael Ejercito
Michael
Dave Heil
> Here is a quote from an article by Julius Streicher in 1944:
>
> Der St�rmer, #23/1944, What is Americanism
>
> "The family ties between hundreds of thousands of German families and
> their American relatives led many to think that America would never
> join a second war against Germany. Now that that has happened, many
> Germans still believe that America will never allow Bolshevism to
> conquer and destroy Germany. Recent events have proven how false and
> dangerous this idea is. One has to be be foolish or irredeemably
> stupid to believe that anything good can come to Europe from the land
> of presumed opportunity. That that did not happen after the First
> World War, and will not happen after the second. The Jews have made
> America what it is today: a nation raped by the Jews , a nation whose
> 130,000,000 people of many colors and races have been forced into
> helping the Jews achieve world domination!"
This letter writing thing didn't work out very well for Herr Streicher,
did it? America DID invade Germany. Germany was made to paid for the
misery she cause Europe, Europeans and the Jews.
Did you have a point, Topie?
Dave Heil
Dave Heil
All correct, Topie. I omitted the revisionist version of events.
Dave Heil
lorad
> "lorad" <lorad...@cs.com> wrote in message
You must be a retard or purposefully evasive.
Just in case you are a retard, 'american culture' is that which
existed prior to an invasion of over 20 million foreign nationals
(mostly mexicans) who are swarming into american towns and stealing US
taxpayer resources and jobs while speaking some sort of foreign
gobbledeegook language instead of English - which has been the common
language of americans since at least the Constitution was written.
Culturally diverse immigrants are just fine... huge hoards of illegal
foreign invaders are not.
David Eduardo
On May 4, 6:55 pm, "David Eduardo" <da...@davideduardo.com> wrote:
> "lorad" <lorad...@cs.com> wrote in message
>
> news:31ce7f17-3a99-4c65...@u10g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Why should ANY american allow a foreign nation to invade the US and
> > replace american culture with a mexican one?
>
> > Who are these traitors?
>
> What is "American Culture?"
>
> Hint: it is the mix of the cultures of all the different peoples who have
> immigrated here over several centuries.
<<You must be a retard or purposefully evasive.
No, just someone who has read a bit of history.
<<Just in case you are a retard, 'american culture' is that which
<existed prior to an invasion of over 20 million foreign nationals
<(mostly mexicans)
The accepted figure for illegal aliens is around 12 million, and estimates
are that the present explosion of the American economy has seen 2 million
return home. In any case, of the 12 million, about 7 to 8 million are from
Latin America, and about 6 million are from Mexico.
In any event, "American Culture" has always been quite dynamic. There was
much of the German and Dutch in the original culture at the time of
Independence. Add millions of Irish in the 1840's (a vastly higher
percentage of the total nation that the few Mexicans today), more millions
of Germans around 1880, and many millions of Italians from the late 1800's
through the start of W.W. II. Then there is the French influence in various
parts of the country, from the Arcadians in Maine to the Bayous of
Louisiana. And the Spanish influence from Texas to California. Add the
African cultural influences in everything from dress to music and food, and
you have a melange of great influences, all of which joined to make the
culture of the nation. A few million folks from Mexico are just going to
contribute a bit more... of course, we have had a Spanish speaking part of
the US, Puerto Rico, since 1898, and no harm seems to have come from that.
Obviously, you don't get the fact that culture is not static.
< who are swarming into american towns and stealing US
<taxpayer resources and jobs while speaking some sort of foreign
<gobbledeegook language instead of English - which has been the common
<language of americans since at least the Constitution was written.
Actually, many languages have been spoken in the US for centuries. Your
ignorance just does not make you aware of it. Let's start with all the
Native American tongues, and the languages of the first settlers in much of
the US. Or do you think Detroit is an English word.... like Los Angeles, or
New Orleans, or New Amsterdam.
lorad
> "lorad" <lorad...@cs.com> wrote in message
>
> news:a8604d64-b259-4434...@x6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com...
> On May 4, 6:55 pm, "David Eduardo" <da...@davideduardo.com> wrote:
>
> > "lorad" <lorad...@cs.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:31ce7f17-3a99-4c65...@u10g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > Why should ANY american allow a foreign nation to invade the US and
> > > replace american culture with a mexican one?
>
> > > Who are these traitors?
>
> > What is "American Culture?"
>
> > Hint: it is the mix of the cultures of all the different peoples who have
> > immigrated here over several centuries.
>
> <<You must be a retard or purposefully evasive.
>
> No, just someone who has read a bit of history.
>
> <<Just in case you are a retard, 'american culture' is that which
> <existed prior to an invasion of over 20 million foreign nationals
> <(mostly mexicans)
>
> The accepted figure for illegal aliens is around 12 million, and estimates
> are that the present explosion of the American economy has seen 2 million
> return home. In any case, of the 12 million, about 7 to 8 million are from
> Latin America, and about 6 million are from Mexico.
Over 90% are from mexico...mexican citizens.
(Actually almost all are since they are allowed to pass through mexico
before sneaking into the US)
And the estimates of illegals that have infiltrated into the US range
up to 32 million.
> In any event, "American Culture" has always been quite dynamic.
And quite northern european.
> There was
> much of the German and Dutch in the original culture at the time of
> Independence. Add millions of Irish in the 1840's (a vastly higher
> percentage of the total nation that the few Mexicans today), more millions
> of Germans around 1880,
All northern europeans who tooke the time to assimilate into the
existing european culture that founded the US.
> ...and many millions of Italians from the late 1800's
> through the start of W.W. II. Then there is the French influence in various
> parts of the country, from the Arcadians in Maine to the Bayous of
> Louisiana. And the Spanish influence from Texas to California.
Europeans.
> Add the
> African cultural influences in everything from dress to music and food, and
> you have a melange of great influences, all of which joined to make the
> culture of the nation.
All of whom have made 'The American Culture'.
> A few million folks from Mexico are just going to
> contribute a bit more...
30 million illegal foreign invaders who are proclaiming a 're-
conquest' of US territory by their mud-hut cultural adherents are
simply *criminals* who have no right to even be on US territory.#)
million illegal invaders are NOT 'a few folks'.
> of course, we have had a Spanish speaking part of
> the US, Puerto Rico, since 1898, and no harm seems to have come from that.
Puerto Rico is a foreign nation that is working for total
independence.
The only reason it has not severed relations is because they receive
huge amounts of welfare money from US taxpayers.
Personally, I think they should be forced to accept independece as
currently they are just another non-productive parasitic drag on US
taxpayer.
(We can only support so many free-loading 'latinos'; resources are
finite)
> Obviously, you don't get the fact that culture is not static.
It is you has lacks an understanding of the value of culture.. US
culture.
You want to trash the current US cullture and replace it with a failed
mexican one.
You want to replace existing americans with mexican criminals.
> < who are swarming into american towns and stealing US
> <taxpayer resources and jobs while speaking some sort of foreign
> <gobbledeegook language instead of English - which has been the common
> <language of americans since at least the Constitution was written.
>
> Actually, many languages have been spoken in the US for centuries.
Minor languages have always benn spoken in private settings.
The goobledeegook mexican language is spoken by huge segments of the
invader community; many do not speak any english at all, and force
their foreign language onto US citizens who (by law) are forced to
attempt to communicate with them.
> Your
> ignorance just does not make you aware of it.
Be quiet, you liar and distorter of facts...
I am far more knowledgable than you.
You are to be a mere disinformation agent.
>Let's start with all the
> Native American tongues,
You go mess with native american tongues if you wish..
I was talking about illegal mexican invaders of US territory... their
undesirabilty, their criminality, their incompatibilty.
> ..and the languages of the first settlers in much of
> the US. Or do you think Detroit is an English word.... like Los Angeles, or
> New Orleans, or New Amsterdam.
Since you cannot overcome the criminality of illegal invasion, you
begin to repeat yourself with incoherent babble.
Come back when you can talk sense again.
Topaz
Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of
political power and banned them from the legal profession. Germany
went from devastating economic poverty in 1932 to full employment just
a couple years later. If an incredible economic improvement can be
achieved, merely by removing the Jews from power (and replacing them
with patriotic nationalists), then every Gentile nation in the world
should give this a try.
Obviously the Jews don't want anyone else getting the idea of removing
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
Topaz
During World War Two the Germans put Jews and Communists in
political opponents and for less reason. At the end of the war there
was a lot of deaths in the German camps from disease and starvation
the Germans had gas chambers or an extermination plan.
Newsweek magazine May 15, 1989 says on page 64:
"the way the Nazis did things: the secrecy, the unwritten orders, the
destruction of records and the innocent-sounding code names for the
extermination of the Jews. Perhaps it was inevitable that historians
would quarrel over just what happened"
The real reason there are no records of an extermination plan is
because there was no extermination plan. The Germans planned to deport
the Jews out of Germany. The records show that they planned to move
them to Madagascar.
Here is part of the Leuchter Report:
"Thirty-one samples were selectively removed from the alleged gas
chambers at Kremas I, II, III, IV and V. A control sample was taken
from delousing facility #1 at Birkenau. The control sample was removed
from a delousing chamber in a location where cyanide was known to have
been used and was apparently present as blue staining. Chemical
testing of the control sample #32 showed a cyanide content of 1050
mg/kg, a very heavy concentration. The conditions at areas from which
these samples were taken are identical with those of the control
sample, cold, dark, and wet. Only Kremas IV and V differed, in the
respect that these locations had sunlight (the buildings have been
torn down) and sunlight may hasten the destruction of uncomplexed
cyanide. The cyanide combines with the iron in the mortar and brick
and becomes ferric-ferro-cyanide or prussian blue pigmentation, a very
stable iron-cyanide complex.
"The locations from which the analyzed samples were removed are set
out in Table III.
"It is notable that almost all the samples were negative and that the
few that were positive were very close to the detection level
(1mg/kg); 6.7 mg/kg at Krema III; 7.9 mg/kg at Krerma I. The absence
of any consequential readings at any of the tested locations as
compared to the control sample reading 1050 mg/kg supports the
evidence that these facilities were not execution gas chambers. The
small quantities detected would indicate that at some point these
buildings were deloused with Zyklon B - as were all the buildings at
all these facilities"
Professional holocaust believers have admitted that the "gas chamber"
which is shown to the tourists at Auschwitz was actually built by the
allies after the war was over. This is what they wrote:
Brian Harmon <har...@msg.ucsf.edu> wrote in article
<080620000051136373%har...@msg.ucsf.edu>...
"You're confusing Krema I with Kremas II-V. Krema I is a
reconstruction, this has never been a secret. Kremas II-V are in
their demolished state as they were left."
Charles Don Hall <cdhall...@erols.com> wrote in article
<8F4CB71B...@news.erols.com>...
"Certainly not! The word "fake" implies a deliberate attempt to
deceive.
"The staff of the Auschwitz museum will readily explain that the Nazis
tried to destroy the gas chambers in a futile attempt to conceal their
crimes. And they'll tell you that reconstruction was done later on. So
it would be dishonest for me to call it a "fake". I'll cheerfully
admit that it's a "reconstruction" if that makes you happy."
They admit that the "gas chamber" shown to the tourists at Auschwitz
was built by the allies after the war was over. There is no physical
evidence that the Germans had gas chambers. No bodies of people who
died from gas have been found. The Communists were the first to enter
the camps. How do the other allies know the Communists didn't blow up
the buildings? Then they could claim that these demolished buildings
used to be gas chambers.
But then the believers will say the Germans confessed. Their main
confession is from Hoess. Here are the details:
"In the introduction to Death Dealer [Buffalo: Prometheus, 1992], the
historian Steven Paskuly wrote: "Just after his capture in 1946, the
British Security Police were able to extract a statement from Hoess by
beating him and filling him with liquor." Paskuly was reiterating what
Rupert Butler and Bernard Clarke had already described.
In 1983, Rupert Butler published an unabashed memoir (Legions of
Death, Hamlyn: London) describing in graphic detail how, over three
days, he and Clarke and other British policemen managed to torture
Hoess into making a "coherent statement." According to Butler [Legions
of Death, p. 237], he and the other interrogators put the boots to
Hoess the moment he was captured. For starters, Clarke struck his face
four times to get H�ess to reveal his true identity.
<quote>
The admission suddenly unleashed the loathing of Jewish sergeants in
the arresting party whose parents had died in Auschwitz following an
order signed by H�ss.
The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pajamas ripped from his
body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where
it seemed to Clarke the blows and screams were endless.
Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: "Call them off,
unless you want to take back a corpse."
A blanket was thrown over H�ss and he was dragged to Clarke's car,
where the sergeant poured a substantial slug of whisky down his
throat. H�ss tried to sleep.
Clarke thrust his service stick under the man's eyelids and ordered in
Geffnan: "Keep your pig eyes open, you swine."
For the first time H�ss trotted out his oft-repeated justification: "I
took my orders from Himmler. I was a soldier in the same way as you
are a soldier and we had to obey orders."
The party arrived back at Heide around three in the morning. The snow
was swirling
still, but the blanket was torn from H�ss and he was made to walk
completely nude
through the prison yard to his cell.
</quote>
An article in the British newspaper Wrexham Leader [Mike Mason, "In a
cell with a Nazi war criminal-We kept him awake until he confessed,"
October 17, 1986] following the airing of a TV documentary on the case
of Rudolf Hoess included eyewitness recollections by Ken Jones:
<quote>
Mr. Ken Jones was then a private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery
stationed at
Heid[e] in Schleswig-Holstein. "They brought him to us when he
refused to
cooperate over questioning about his activities during the war. He
came in the winter
of 1945/6 and was put in a small jail cell in the barracks," recalls
Mr. Jones. Two
other soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join H�ss in his cell
to help break
him down for interrogation. "We sat in the cell with him, night and
day, armed with
axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time he fell asleep to
help break down
his resistance," said Mr. Jones. When H�ss was taken out for exercise
he was made
to wear only jeans and a cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three
days and
nights without sleep, H�ss finally broke down and made a full
confession to
the authorities.
</quote>
The confession Hoess signed was numbered document NO-1210; later
revamped, as document PS-3868, which became the basis for an oral
deposition Hoess made for the IMT on April 15, 1946, a month after it
had been extracted from him by torture...
Since what people confess to after they have been captured by the
Communists and their liberal comrades is not proof of anything, this
leaves only the stories of survivors. These contradict each other and
not believable. One professional survivor said that he could tell if
the Germans were gassing German Jews or Polish Jews by the color of
the smoke.
The fact that there are so many "survivors" is not proof of an
extermination plan. There may be six million survivors. Just about
every Jew that is old says he is a survivor.
The real "holocaust" was when the Communist Jews murdered millions of
Christians. Communism was Jewish. Here is proof:
Article Winston Churchill wrote in 1920:
"This movement amongst the Jews (the Russian Revolution) is not new.
From the days of Spartacus Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down
to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kuhn (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany)
and Emma Goldman (United States), this world wide conspiracy for the
overthrow of civilization and the reconstruction of society on the
basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible
equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer,
Mrs. Nesta Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part
in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of
every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at
last this band of extraordinary personalities has gripped the Russian
people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the
undisputed masters of that enormous empire. There is no need to
exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the
actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international
and for the most part atheistic Jews. Moreover, the principal
inspiration and driving power comes from Jewish leaders." (ibid)
Lev Trotzky wrote a book called "Stalin: An Appraisal of the Man and
His Influence", Harper Bros., New York and London, 1941, translated by
Charles Malamuth.
In this book he told who the principle members of the October Central
Committee were. This group was the leadership of the Bolshevik Party
during the October Revolution. This is what he wrote:
"In view of the Party's semi-legality the names of persons elected by
secret ballot were not announced at the Congress, with the exception
of the four who had received the largest number of votes. Lenin--133
out of a possible 134, Zinoviev--132, Kamenev--131, Trotzky--131."
Of these four top leaders of the Bolshevik Party the last three were
known Jews. Lenin was thought to be a gentile married to a Jewess. It
was later proven that he was one quarter Jewish, London Jewish
Chronicle April 21, 1995, Lenin: Life and Legacy.
David Francis, the American Ambassador to Russia at the time of the
Revolution, wrote:
"The Bolshevic leaders here, most of whom are Jews and 90 percent of
whom are returned exiles, care little for Russia or any other country
but are internationalists and they are trying to start a world-wide
revolution."
The Director of British Intelligence to the U.S. Secretary of State
wrote this:
"There is now definite evidence that Bolshevism is an international
movement controlled by Jews."
In 1945 the FBI arrested six individuals for stealing 1700 highly
confidential documents from State Department files. This was the
Amerasia case they were:
Philip Jaffe, a Russian Jew who came to the U.S. in 1905. He was at
one time the editor of the communist paper "Labor Defense" and the
ringleader of the group arrested.
Andrew Roth, a Jew.
Mark Gayn, a Jew, changed his name from Julius Ginsberg.
John Service, a gentile.
Emmanuel Larsen, nationality unknown
Kate Mitchel, nationality unknown.
In 1949 the Jewess Judith Coplin was caught passing classified
documents from Justice Department files to a Russian agent.
The highest ranking communist brought to trial in the U.S. was Gerhart
Eisler. He was a Jew. He was the secret boss of the Communist Party
in the U.S. and commuted regularly between the U.S. and Russia.
In 1950 there was the "Hollywood Ten" case. Ten leading film writers
of the Hollywood Film Colony were convicted for contempt of Congress
and sentenced to prison. Nine of the ten were Jews. Six of the ten
were communist party members and the other four were flagrantly
pro-communist.
One of the top new stories of 1949 was the trial of Eugene Dennis and
the Convicted Eleven. This group comprised the National Secretariat of
the American Communist Party. Six were Jews, two gentiles, three
nationality unknown.
Also in 1949 the German-born atomic scientist Klaus Fuchs was
convicted for passing atomic secrets to the Russians. Acting on
information obtained from Fuchs the FBI arrested nine other members of
the ring. All of them were convicted. Eight of the nine were Jews.
Here are some quotes from a very pro-Jewish book that was first
published in 1925. The book is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis
Browne.
"But save for such exceptions, the Jews who led or participated in the
heroic efforts to remold the world of the last century, were neither
Reform or Orthodox. Indeed, they were often not professing Jews at
all.
"For instance, there was Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne, both
unfaltering champions of freedom. And even more conspicuously, there
was Karl Marx, one of the great prophetic geniuses of modern times.
"Jewish historians rarely mention the name of this man, Karl Marx,
though in his life and spirit he was far truer to the mission of
Israel than most of those who were forever talking of it. He was born
in Germany in 1818, and belonged to an old rabbinic family. He was not
himself reared as a Jew, however, but while still a child was baptized
a Christian by his father. Yet the rebel soul of the Jew flamed in him
throughout his days, for he was always a 'troubler' in Europe."
"Then, of course, there are Ludwig Borne and Heinrich Heine, two men
who by their merciless wit and sarcasm became leaders among the
revolutionary writers. Karl Marx, Ferdinand Lassalle, Johann Jacoby,
Gabriel Riesser, Adolphe Cremieux, Signora Nathan- all these of Jewish
lineage played important roles in the struggle that went throughout
Europe in this period. Wherever the war for human liberty was being
waged, whether in France, Germany, Austria, Hungary, or Italy, there
the Jew was to be found. It was little wonder that the enemies of
social progress, the monarchists and the Churchmen, came to speak of
the whole liberal movement as nothing but a Jewish plot."
The book "Soviet Russia and the Jews" by Gregor Aronson and published
by the American Jewish League Against Communism, quotes Stalin in an
interview in 1931 with the Jewish Telegraph Agency. Stalin said:
"...Communists cannot be anything but outspoken enemies of
Anti-Semitism. We fight anti-Semites by the strongest methods in the
Soviet Union. Active anti-Semites are punished by death under the
law."
The following quotes are taken directly from documents available from
the
U.S. Archives:
State Department document 861.00/1757 sent May 2, 1918 by U.S. consul
general in Moscow, Summers: "Jews prominent in local Soviet
government, anti-Jewish feeling growing among population...."
State Department document 861.00/2205 was sent from Vladivostok on
July 5, 1918 by U.S. consul Caldwell: "Fifty percent of Soviet
government in each town consists of Jews of the worst type."
From the Headquarters of the American Expeditionary Forces, Siberia on
March 1, 1919, comes this telegram from Omsk by Chief of Staff, Capt.
Montgomery Shuyler: "It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the
United States but the Bolshevik movement is and has been since it's
beginning, guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest
type" type."
A second Schuyler telegram, dated June 9, 1919 from Vladivostok,
reports on the make-up of the presiding Soviet government: "...(T)here
were 384 'commissars' including 2 negroes, 13 Russians, 15 Chinamen,
22 Armenians, AND MORE THAN 300 JEWS. Of the latter number, 264 had
come to Russia from the United States since the downfall of the
Imperial Government.
The Netherlands' ambassador in Russia, Oudendyke, confirmed this:
"Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately, it is bound to
spread in one form or another over Europe and the whole world as it is
organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality, and whose one
object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things."
"The Bolshevik revolution in Russia was the work of Jewish brains, of
Jewish dissatisfaction, of Jewish planning, whose goal is to create a
new order in the world. What was performed in so excellent a way in
Russia, thanks to Jewish brains, and because of Jewish dissatisfaction
and by Jewish planning, shall also, through the same Jewish mental an
physical forces, become a reality all over the world." (The American
Hebrew, September 10, 1920 "In the Bolshevik era, 52 percent of the
membership of the Soviet communist party was Jewish, though Jews
comprised only 1.8 percent of the total population." (Stuart Kahan,
The Wolf of the Kremlin, p. 81)
Interestingly, one of the first acts by the Bolsheviks was to make
so-called "anti-Semitism" a capital crime. This is confirmed by Stalin
himself:
"National and racial chauvinism is a vestige of the misanthropic
customs characteristic of the period of cannibalism. Anti-semitism, as
an extreme form of racial chauvinism, is the most dangerous vestige of
cannibalism...under USSR law active anti-Semites are liable to the
death penalty." (Stalin, Collected Works, vol. 13, p. 30).
Here is a quote from Mein Kampf:
"Making an effort to overcome my natural reluctance, I tried to read
articles of this nature published in the Marxist Press; but in doing
so my aversion increased all the more. And then I set about learning
something of the people who wrote and published this mischievous
stuff. From the publisher downwards, all of them were Jews. I
recalled to mind the names of the public leaders of Marxism, and then
I realized that most of them belonged to the Chosen Race- the Social
Democratic representatives in the Imperial Cabinet as well as the
secretaries if the Trades Unions and the street agitators. Everywhere
the same sinister picture presented itself. I shall never forget the
row of names- Austerlitz, David, Adler, Ellonbogen, and others. One
fact became quite evident to me. It was that this alien race held in
its hands the leadership of that Social Democratic Party with whose
minor representatives I had been disputing for months past."
Solzhenitsyn named in his book the six top administrators of the
Soviet death camps. All six of them were Jews.
Here is something the National Socialists wrote:
"The Soviet Union was in fact a paradise for one group: the Jews. Even
at times when for foreign policy reasons Jews were less evident in the
government, or when they ruled through straw men, the Jews were always
visible in the middle and lower levels of the administration."
Topaz
The Unraveling of the Witnesses at the First Z�ndel Trial (1985)
The important victory won by revisionism in France on April 26, 1983,
would go on to confirm itself in 1985 with the first Z�ndel trial in
Toronto. I would like to dwell a moment on this trial in order to
underscore the impact on one's point of view, and especially as far as
the testimonies on the Auschwitz gas chambers are concerned: for the
first time since the war, Jewish witnesses were subjected to a regular
cross-examination. Moreover, without wanting to minimize the
importance of the second Z�ndel trial (that of 1988), I should like it
to be understood that the 1985 trial already contained the seeds for
all that was attained in the 1988 trial, including the report by
Leuchter and all the scientific reports which, in the aftermath, would
proliferate in the wake of the Leuchter Report.
In 1985, as also afterwards in 1988, I served as advisor to Ernst
Z�ndel and his lawyer, Douglas Christie. I accepted this heavy
responsibility only under condition that all the Jewish witnesses
would, for the first time, be cross-examined on the material nature of
the reported facts, bluntly and without discretion. I had noted, in
effect, that from 1945 to 1985, Jewish witnesses had been granted
virtual immunity. Never had any defense lawyer thought or dared to ask
them for material explanations about the gas chambers (exact location,
physical appearance, dimensions, internal and external structure), or
about the homicidal gassing (the operational procedure from beginning
to end, the tools employed, the precautions taken by the executioners
before, during and after execution).
On rare occasions, as at the trial of Tesch, Drosihn and
Weinbacher,[5] lawyers formulated some unusual questions of a material
nature, hardly troublesome for the witness, but these always found
themselves on the fringes of the more fundamental questions which
should have been asked. No lawyer ever demanded clarifications on a
weapon which, indeed, he had never seen and that no one had ever shown
him. At the major Nuremberg Trial of 1945-46, the German lawyers had
manifested total discretion on this point. At the proceedings against
Eichmann in Jerusalem in 1961, the lawyer Dr. Robert Servatius had not
wanted to raise the question; in a letter on this subject dated June
21, 1974, he wrote me: "Eichmann hat selbst keine Gaskammer gesehen;
die Frage wurde nicht diskutiert; er hat sich aber auch nicht gegen
deren Existenz gewandt" [Eichmann himself had not seen any gas
chamber; the question was not discussed; but neither did he raise the
issue of their existence].[6]
At the Frankfurt Trial of 1963-65, the lawyers showed themselves to be
particularly timid. I should mention that the atmosphere was rather
inhospitable for the defense and the accused. This show trial will
remain as a blot on the honor of German justice as on the person of
Hans Hofmeyer, initially Landgerichtsdirektor, then Senatspr�sident.
During more than 180 sessions, the judges and juries, the public
prosecutors and the private parties, the accused and their attorneys,
as well as the journalists who had come from around the world,
accepted as a complete physical representation of the 'crime weapon' a
mere map of the camp of Auschwitz and a map of the camp of Birkenau,
whereupon five minuscule geometric figures were inscribed for the
location of each of the alleged homicidal gas chambers, with the
words, for Auschwitz: "Altes Krematorium", and for Birkenau:
"Krematorium II", "Krematorium III", "Krematorium IV", and
"Krematorium V"! These maps[7] were displayed in the courtroom.
The Revisionists have often compared the Frankfurt trial with the
1450-1650 trials against witchcraft. Nevertheless, at least during
those trials, someone sometimes bothered to describe or depict the
witches' sabbath. At the Frankfurt trial, even among the lawyers who
made difficulties for a witness like Filip M�ller, not one asked of a
Jewish witness or a repentant German defendant to describe for him in
greater detail what he was purported to have seen. Despite two
judicial visits to the scene of the crime at Auschwitz, accompanied by
some German lawyers, it seems not one of the latter insisted on any
technical explanations or criminological expertise regarding the
murder weapon. To the contrary, one of them, Anton Reiners, a
Frankfurt lawyer, pushed complacency to the point of having himself
photographed by the press while raising the chute cover by which the
SS supposedly sprinkled Zyklon B granules into the alleged Auschwitz
gas chamber.
And so at Toronto in 1985, I had fully decided to do away with these
anomalies, to break the taboo and, for starters, pose, or rather have
Douglas Christie pose, questions to the experts and Jewish witnesses
as one normally poses in every trial where one is supposed to
establish whether a crime has been committed and, if so, by whom, how
and when.
Fortunately for me, Ernst Z�ndel accepted my conditions and Douglas
Christie consented to adopt this course of action and to pose to the
experts and witnesses the questions that I would prepare for him. I
was convinced that, in this manner, all might change, and the veil
woven by so many false testimonies could be torn away. While I was not
counting on Ernst Z�ndel's acquittal and we were all resigned to
paying the price for our audacity, I nevertheless had hope that with
the aid of this far-sighted man of character, and thanks to his
intrepid lawyer, history, if not justice, would at last carry him into
historical prominence.
From the moment of the first cross-examination, a tremor of panic
began to creep its way amid the ranks of the prosecution. Every
evening and throughout most of the night, I would prepare the
questions to ask. In the morning, I would turn over these questions,
accompanied by the necessary documents, to lawyer Doug Christie who,
for his part and with the aid of his female collaborator, conducted
the essentially legal aspects of the effort. During the
cross-examinations, I maintained a position close to the lawyer's
podium and unremittingly furnished, on yellow notepads, supplementary
and improvisational questions according to the experts' and witnesses'
responses.
The expert cited by the prosecution was Dr. Raul Hilberg, author of
The Destruction of European Jews. Day after day, he was subjected to
such humiliation that, when solicited in 1988 by a new prosecutor for
a new trial against Ernst Z�ndel, Prof. Hilberg refused to return to
give witness; he explained the motive for his refusal in a
confidential letter wherein he acknowledged his fear of having to once
again confront the questions of Douglas Christie. From the
cross-examination of Dr. Raul Hilberg, it was definitively brought out
that no one possessed any proof for the existence either of an order,
a plan, an instruction, or a budget for the presumed physical
extermination of the Jews. Furthermore, no one possessed either an
expertise of the murder weapon (whether gas chamber or gas van), or an
autopsy report establishing the murder of a detainee by poison gas.
However, in the absence of evidence regarding the weapon and victim,
did there exist witnesses of the crime?
A testimony must always be verified. The usual first means of
proceeding to this verification is to confront the assertions of the
witness with the results of investigations or expert opinion regarding
the material nature of the crime. In the case at hand, there were
neither investigations, nor expertise relative to the alleged
Auschwitz gas chambers. Here is what made any cross-examination
difficult. Yet, this difficulty should not serve as an excuse, and one
might even say that a cross-examination becomes ever more
indispensable because, without it, there no longer remains any way of
knowing whether the witness is telling the truth or not.
Jewish Witnesses Finally Cross-Examined:
Arnold Friedman and Dr. Rudolf Vrba
For those persons interested in the technical and documentary means by
which we were nevertheless in a position to severely cross-examine the
two principal Jewish witnesses, Arnold Friedman and Dr. Rudolf Vrba, I
can do no better than to recommend a reading of the trial
transcript.[8] Pages 304-371 cover the questioning and
cross-examination of Arnold Friedman; the latter breaks down on pages
445-446 when he ends by acknowledging that he in fact saw nothing,
that he had spoken from hearsay because, according to him, he had met
persons who were convincing; perhaps, he added, he would have adopted
the position of Mr. Christie rather than that of these other persons
if only Mr. Christie had been able to tell him back then what he was
telling him now!
Dr. Vrba was a witness of exceptional importance. One might even say
about this trial in Toronto that the prosecution had found the means
of recruiting 'Holocaust' expert number one in the person of Dr. Raul
Hilberg, and witness number one in the person of Dr. Rudolf Vrba. The
testimony of this latter gentleman had been one of the principal
sources of the famous War Refugee Board Report on the German
Extermination Camps - Auschwitz and Birkenau, published in November
1944 by the Executive Office of President Roosevelt. Dr. R. Vrba was
also the author of I Cannot Forgive,[9] written in collaboration with
Alan Bestic who, in his preface, declares with regard to him:
"Indeed I would like to pay tribute to him for the immense trouble he
took over every detail; for the meticulous, almost fanatical respect
he revealed for accuracy." (p.2).
,Never perhaps, had a court of justice seen a witness express himself
with more assurance on the Auschwitz gas chambers. Yet, by the end of
the cross-examination, the situation had reversed itself to the point
where Dr. R. Vrba was left with only one explanation for his errors
and his lies: in his book he had, he confessed, resorted to "poetic
license" or, as he was wont to say in Latin, to "licentia poetarum"!
In the end, a bit of drama unfolded: Mr. Griffiths, the prosecutor who
had himself solicited the presence of this witness numero uno and yet
now apparently exasperated by Dr. Vrba's lies, fired off the following
question:
"You told Mr. Christie several times in discussing your book I Cannot
Forgive that you used poetic license in writing that book. Have you
used poetic license in your testimony?" (p. 1636).
The false witness tried to parry the blow but prosecutor Griffiths hit
him with a second question equally treacherous, this time concerning
the number of gassing victims which Vrba had given; the witness
responded with garrulous nonsense; Griffiths was getting ready to ask
him a third and final question when suddenly, the matter was cut short
and one heard the prosecutor say to the judge:
"I have no further questions for Dr. Vrba" (p. 1643).
Crestfallen, the witness left the dock. Dr. Vrba's initial
questioning, cross-examination and final questioning filled 400 pages
of transcripts (pp. 1244-1643). These pages could readily be used in
an encyclopedia of law under a chapter on the detection of false
witnesses.
The Prosecution Gives up on Calling Witnesses
Three years later, in 1988, during the second trial against Ernst
Z�ndel, the public prosecutor deemed it prudent to abandon any
recourse to witnesses. Canadian justice had apparently understood the
lesson of the first trial: there were no credible witnesses to the
existence and operation of the 'Nazi gas chambers'.
Little by little, every other country in the world has learned this
same lesson. At the trial of Klaus Barbie in France, in 1987, there
was talk about the gas chambers of Auschwitz but no one produced any
witnesses who could properly speak about them.[10] The attorney
Jacques Verg�s, courageous yet not foolhardy, preferred to avoid the
subject. This was a stroke of luck for the Jewish lawyers who feared
nothing so much as to see me appearing at the side of Mr. Verg�s. If
this gentleman had accepted my offer to counsel him, we in France
might have been able to strike a tremendous blow against the myth of
the gas chambers.
All the while in France, during several revisionist trials, Jewish
witnesses sometimes came to evoke the gas chambers but none of them
testified before the court as to having seen one or having
participated in a homicidal gassing by hauling bodies out of the 'gas
chambers'.
Today, gas chamber witnesses are making themselves extremely scarce
and the Demjanjuk trial in Israel, which once again has revealed how
much false testimony is involved in the matter, has contributed to the
suppression. Several years ago, it happened that I was aggressively
questioned at the rear of a law court by elderly Jews who presented
themselves as "living witnesses to the gas chambers of Auschwitz",
showing me their tattoos. It was necessary for me only to ask them to
look me in the eyes and to describe for me a gas chamber that
inevitably they retorted:
"How could I do this? If I had seen a gas chamber with my own eyes I
would not be here today to speak with you; I myself would have been
gassed also."
This brings us back, as one can see, to Simone Veil and her
declaration of May 7, 1983, about which we already know what we should
think�
Topaz
Montgomey Shuyler: "It is probably unwise to say this loudly in the
Topaz
Auschwitz: Myths and facts
by Mark Weber
Nearly everyone has heard of Auschwitz, the German wartime
concentration camp where many prisoners-most of them Jewish-were
reportedly exterminated, especially in gas chambers. Auschwitz is
widely regarded as the most terrible Nazi extermination center. The
camp's horrific reputation cannot, however, be reconciled with the
facts.
Scholars challenge Holocaust story
Astonishing as it may seem, more and more historians and engineers
have been challenging the widely accepted Auschwitz story. These
"revisionist" scholars do not dispute the fact that large numbers of
Jews were deported to the camp, or that many died there, particularly
of typhus and other diseases. But the compelling evidence they present
shows that Auschwitz was not an extermination center and that the
story of mass killings in "gas chambers" is a myth.
The Auschwitz camps
The Auschwitz camp complex was set up in 1940 in what is now
south-central Poland. Large numbers of Jews were deported there
between 1942 and mid-1944.
The main camp was known as Auschwitz I. Birkenau, or Auschwitz II, was
supposedly the main extermination center, and Monowitz, or Auschwitz
III, was a large industrial center where gasoline was produced from
coal. In addition there were dozens of smaller satellite camps devoted
to the war economy.
Four million victims?
At the postwar Nuremberg Tribunal, the Allies charged that the Germans
exterminated four million people at Auschwitz. This figure, which was
invented by the Soviets, was uncritically accepted for many years. It
often appeared in major American newspapers and magazines, for
example. (note 1)
Today no reputable historian, not even those who generally accept the
extermination story, believes this figure. Israeli Holocaust historian
Yehuda Bauer said in 1989 that it is time to finally acknowledge the
familiar four million figure is a deliberate myth. In July 1990 the
Auschwitz State Museum in Poland, along with Israel's Yad Vashem
Holocaust Center, suddenly announced that altogether perhaps one
million people (both Jews and non-Jews) died there. Neither
institution would say how many of these people were killed, nor were
any estimates given of the numbers of those supposedly gassed. (note
2) One prominent Holocaust historian, Gerald Reitlinger, has estimated
that perhaps 700,000 or so Jews perished at Auschwitz. More recently,
Holocaust historian Jean-Claude Pressac has estimated that about
800,000 persons-of whom 630,000 were Jewish-perished at Auschwitz.
While even such lower figures are incorrect, they show how the
Auschwitz story has changed drastically over the years. (note 3)
Bizarre tales
At one time it was seriously claimed that Jews were systematically
electrocuted at Auschwitz. American newspapers, citing a Soviet
eyewitness report from liberated Auschwitz, told readers in February
1945 that the methodical Germans had killed Jews there using an
"electric conveyor belt on which hundreds of persons could be
electrocuted simultaneously [and] then moved on into furnaces. They
were burned almost instantly, producing fertilizer for nearby cabbage
fields." (note 4)
And at the Nuremberg Tribunal, chief U.S. prosecutor Robert Jackson
charged that the Germans used a "newly invented" device to
instantaneously "vaporize" 20,000 Jews near Auschwitz "in such a way
that there was no trace left of them." (note 5) No reputable historian
now accepts either of these fanciful tales.
The H�ss 'confession'
A key Holocaust document is the "confession" of former Auschwitz
commandant Rudolf H�ss of April 5, 1946, which was submitted by the
U.S. prosecution at the main Nuremberg trial. (note 6)
Although it is still widely cited as solid proof for the Auschwitz
extermination story, it is actually a false statement that was
obtained by torture.
Many years after the war, British military intelligence sergeant
Bernard Clarke described how he and five other British soldiers
tortured the former commandant to obtain his "confession." H�ss
himself privately explained his ordeal in these words: "Certainly, I
signed a statement that I killed two and half million Jews. I could
just as well have said that it was five million Jews. There are
certain methods by which any confession can be obtained, whether it is
true or not." (note 7)
Even historians who generally accept the Holocaust extermination story
now acknowledge that many of the specific statements made in the H�ss
"affidavit" are simply not true. For one thing, no serious scholar now
claims that anything like two and a half or three million people
perished in Auschwitz.
The H�ss "affidavit" further alleges that Jews were already being
exterminated by gas in the summer of 1941 at three other camps:
Belzec, Treblinka and Wolzek. The "Wolzek" camp mentioned by H�ss is a
total invention. No such camp existed, and the name is no longer
mentioned in Holocaust literature. Moreover, the story these days by
those who believe in the Holocaust legend is that gassings of Jews did
not begin at Auschwitz, Treblinka, or Belzec until sometime in 1942.
No documentary evidence
Many thousands of secret German documents dealing with Auschwitz were
confiscated after the war by the Allies. Not a single one refers to a
policy or program of extermination. In fact, the extermination story
cannot be reconciled with the documentary evidence.
Many Jewish inmates unable to work
For example, it is often claimed that all Jews at Auschwitz who were
unable to work were immediately killed. Jews who were too old, young,
sick, or weak were supposedly gassed on arrival, and only those who
could be worked to death were temporarily kept alive.
But the evidence shows that, in fact, a very high percentage of the
Jewish inmates were not able to work, and were nevertheless not
killed. For example, an internal German telex message dated Sept. 4,
1943, from the chief of the Labor Allocation department of the SS
Economic and Administrative Main Office (WVHA), reported that of
25,000 Jewish inmates in Auschwitz, only 3,581 were able to work, and
that all of the remaining Jewish inmates-some 21,500, or about 86
percent-were unable to work. (note 8)
This is also confirmed in a secret report dated April 5, 1944, on
"security measures in Auschwitz" by Oswald Pohl, head of the SS
concentration camp system, to SS chief Heinrich Himmler. Pohl reported
that there was a total of 67,000 inmates in the entire Auschwitz camp
complex, of whom 18,000 were hospitalized or disabled. In the
Auschwitz II camp (Birkenau), supposedly the main extermination
center, there were 36,000 inmates, mostly female, of whom
"approximately 15,000 are unable to work." (note 9)
These two documents simply cannot be reconciled with the Auschwitz
extermination story.
The evidence shows that Auschwitz-Birkenau was established primarily
as a camp for Jews who were not able to work, including the sick and
elderly, as well as for those who were temporarily awaiting assignment
to other camps. That's the considered view of Dr. Arthur Butz of
Northwestern University, who also says that this was the reason for
the unusually high death rate there. (note 10)
Princeton University history professor Arno Mayer, who is Jewish,
acknowledges in a recent book about the "final solution" that more
Jews perished at Auschwitz as a result of typhus and other "natural"
causes than were executed. (note 11)
Anne Frank
Perhaps the best known Auschwitz inmate was Anne Frank, who is known
around the world for her famous diary. But few people know that
thousands of Jews, including Anne and her father, Otto Frank,
"survived" Auschwitz.
The 15-year-old girl and her father were deported from the Netherlands
to Auschwitz in September 1944. Several weeks later, in the face of
the advancing Soviet army, Anne was evacuated along with many other
Jews to the Bergen-Belsen camp, where she died of typhus in March
1945.
Her father came down with typhus in Auschwitz and was sent to the camp
hospital to recover. He was one of thousands of sick and feeble Jews
who were left behind when the Germans abandoned the camp in January
1945, shortly before it was overrun by the Soviets. He died in
Switzerland in 1980.
If the German policy had been to kill Anne Frank and her father, they
would not have survived Auschwitz. Their fate, tragic though it was,
cannot be reconciled with the extermination story.
Allied propaganda
The Auschwitz gassing story is based in large part on the hearsay
statements of former Jewish inmates who did not personally see any
evidence of extermination. Their beliefs are understandable, because
rumors about gassings at Auschwitz were widespread.
Allied planes dropped large numbers of LEAFLETS , written in Polish
and German, on Auschwitz and the surrounding areas which claimed that
people were being gassed in the camp. The Auschwitz gassing story,
which was an important part of the Allied wartime propaganda effort,
was also broadcast to Europe by Allied radio stations. (note 12)
Survivor testimony
Former inmates have confirmed that they saw no evidence of
extermination at Auschwitz.
An Austrian woman, Maria Vanherwaarden, testified about her camp
experiences in a Toronto District Court in March 1988. She was
interned in Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1942 for having sexual relations
with a Polish forced laborer. On the train trip to the camp, a Gypsy
woman told her and the others that they would all be gassed at
Auschwitz.
Upon arrival, Maria and the other women were ordered to undress and go
into a large concrete room without windows to take a shower. The
terrified women were sure that they were about to die. But then,
instead of gas, water came out of the shower heads.
Auschwitz was no vacation center, Maria confirmed. She witnessed the
death of many fellow inmates by disease, particularly typhus, and
quite a few committed suicide. But she saw no evidence at all of mass
killings, gassings, or of any extermination program. (note 13)
A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from
Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and
cremated daily. She likewise testified after the war that she heard
and saw nothing of "gas chambers" during the time she was interned
there. She heard the gassing stories only later. (note 14)
Inmates released
Auschwitz internees who had served their sentences were released and
returned to their home countries. If Auschwitz had actually been a top
secret extermination center, the Germans would certainly not have
released inmates who "knew" what was happening in the camp. (note 15)
Himmler orders death rate reduced
In response to the deaths of many inmates due to disease, especially
typhus, the German authorities responsible for the camps ordered firm
counter-measures.
The head of the SS camp administration office sent a directive dated
Dec. 28, 1942, to Auschwitz and the other concentration camps. It
sharply criticized the high death rate of inmates due to disease, and
ordered that "camp physicians must use all means at their disposal to
significantly reduce the death rate in the various camps."
Furthermore, it ordered:
The camp doctors must supervise more often than in the past the
nutrition of the prisoners and, in cooperation with the
administration, submit improvement recommendations to the camp
commandants . . . The camp doctors are to see to it that the working
conditions at the various labor places are improved as much as
possible.
Finally, the directive stressed that "the Reichsfhrer SS [Heinrich
Himmler] has ordered that the death rate absolutely must be reduced."
(note 16)
German camp regulations
Official German camp regulations make clear that Auschwitz was not an
extermination center. They ordered: (note 17)
New arrivals in the camp are to be given a thorough medical
examination, and if there is any doubt [about their health], they must
be sent to quarantine for observation.
Prisoners who report sick must be examined that same day by the camp
physician. If necessary, the physician must transfer the prisoners to
a hospital for professional treatment.
The camp physician must regularly inspect the kitchen regarding the
preparation of the food and the quality of the food supply. Any
deficiencies that may arise must be reported to the camp commandant.
Special care should be given in the treatment of accidents, in order
not to impair the full productivity of the prisoners.
Prisoners who are to be released or transfered must first be brought
before the camp physician for medical examination.
Telltale aerial photos
Detailed aerial reconnaissance photographs taken of Auschwitz-Birkenau
on several random days in 1944 (during the height of the alleged
extermination period there) were made public by the CIA in 1979. These
photos show no trace of piles of corpses, smoking crematory chimneys
or masses of Jews awaiting death, things that have been repeatedly
alleged, and all of which would have been clearly visible if Auschwitz
had been the extermination center it is said to have been. (note 18)
Absurd cremation claims
Cremation specialists have confirmed that thousands of corpses could
not possibly have been cremated every day throughout the spring and
summer of 1944 at Auschwitz, as commonly alleged.
For example, Mr. Ivan Lagace, manager of a large crematory in Calgary,
Canada, testified in court in April 1988 that the Auschwitz cremation
story is technically impossible. The allegation that 10,000 or even
20,000 corpses were burned every day at Auschwitz in the summer of
1944 in crematories and open pits is simply "preposterous" and "beyond
the realm of reality," he declared under oath. (note 19)
Gassing expert refutes extermination story
America's leading gas chamber expert, Boston engineer Fred A.
Leuchter, carefully examined the supposed "gas chambers" in Poland and
concluded that the Auschwitz gassing story is absurd and technically
impossible.
Leuchter is the foremost specialist on the design and installation of
gas chambers used in the United States to execute convicted criminals.
For example, he designed a gas chamber facility for the Missouri state
penitentiary.
In February 1988 he carried out a detailed onsite examination of the
"gas chambers" at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek in Poland, which
are either still standing or only partially in ruins. In sworn
testimony to a Toronto court and in a technical report, Leuchter
described every aspect of his investigation.
He concluded by emphatically declaring that the alleged gassing
facilities could not possibly have been used to kill people. Among
other things, he pointed out that the so-called "gas chambers" were
not properly sealed or vented to kill human beings without also
killing German camp personnel. (note 20)
Dr. William B. Lindsey, a research chemist employed for 33 years by
the Dupont Corporation, likewise testified in a 1985 court case that
the Auschwitz gassing story is technically impossible. Based on a
careful on-site examination of the "gas chambers" at Auschwitz,
Birkenau and Majdanek, and on his years of experience, he declared: "I
have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully
killed with Zyklon B [hydrocyanic acid gas] in this manner. I consider
it absolutely impossible." (note 21)
Topaz
German leaders believed in death before dishonor. They knew the
allies were subhuman monsters:
The Diaries of Charles A. Lindbergh, p.986
"That young girl riding on her bicycle - she must know that on the
day the Russians come she will probably be raped by a dozen soldiers.
When do they come? In days? In weeks? That, we have not told the
Germans. She has a good face - nicely dressed in old but clean and
brightly colored garments - like the daughter of a middle class
American family. I realize that we Americans are holding her at
Dessau. She cannot flee to safety.
We will not let her pass our sentries on the roads. We are turning her
and thousands of
others like her over to the Soviet soldiers for their sport. I feel
ashamed."
p.961
"German children look in through the window. We have more food than
we need, but regulations prevent giving it to them. It is difficult to
look at them. I feel ashamed of myself, of my people, as I eat and
watch those children. They are not to blame for the war. They are
hungry children. What right have we to stuff ourselves while they look
on - well-fed men eating, leaving unwanted food on plates, while
hungry children look on."
Berlin Correspondent, The Times, September 10th, 1945
"...Another small boy turned out of Danzig had a scrawled postcard
attached to him stating that his soldier father was long since missing
and that his mother and two sisters had died of hunger."
At this time, Denmark, formerly occupied by the Germans as a means
of denying the allies a North Sea bridgehead was bursting at the seams
with surplus food and was pleading with the allies to put it to good
use. It was refused.
Topaz
The Nazis and Hitler Saved Us
The really bad guys in World War 2 were the western allies, especially
the Americans. The monumental blindness and stupidity, unmatched
barbarism and sadism of America and Britain nearly brought a new Dark
Age upon a world dominated, not by them, but by the Soviet Union and
communism, Although the Nazis and fascists lost the war-their heroic
struggle with hardly any resources against overwhelming odds allowed
western civilization to survive. After 1945, it was the atomic bomb,
far above and beyond everything else, which allowed the west to
survive, even to this day-but before that, it was ADOLF HITLER who
saved us. For that he deserves our eternal gratitude and admiration.
It was HITLER who built and inspired the small coalition of the
willing to fight the good war against communism. By launching the
attack on the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941 with only conventional
weapons, HITLER and Germany, and Germany's allies pre-empted STALIN's
well-prepared and massive attack to the west, and postponed a complete
Soviet victory long enough for the US and Britain to finally come to
their senses. The US and Britain eventually took up essentially the
same struggle with nuclear weapons, or at least the threat of nuclear
weapons, even when that meant possible destruction of all life on the
planet.
Friedrich Paul Berg
Learn everything at www.nazigassings.com
Topaz
America was founded and built by White people.
Jefferson's lifelong advocacy of racial separatism is
well-documented and undeniable. He desired that all Blacks be
returned to Africa or, in the interest of practicality, shipped to
the island of Santo Domingo in the Caribbean. Any interpretation of
Jefferson's words which is in direct contradiction to his forcefully
and repeatedly expressed beliefs on race is obviously an incorrect
interpretation.
Naturally, what the boobs are taught in the schools and on the idiot
box about these words is totally at variance with the facts of the
matter.
Thomas Jefferson, who rationally opposed Black slavery on the
grounds that it was bad for both races, also opposed converting
America into a multiracial society. His plan to end slavery included
a plan for the humane resettlement of all freed Blacks in Africa.
From 1776 to 1778, Jefferson drafted proposed revisions and
modernizations to the laws of Virginia dealing with slaves. When
finished, his proposals included these provisions:
1. Free Blacks were forbidden to enter the state.
2. Blacks freed in Virginia were required to leave the state within
one year.
3. A White woman bearing a mixed-race child was required to leave
Virginia within one year.
4. Those who violated these statutes were to be placed "outside of
the protection of the laws"-that is, they could be dealt with by
anyone in any way with absolute impunity, which was the original
meaning of the term "outlaw" and which certainly constituted a most
terrible punishment.
In 1824, only two years before his death, Jefferson proposed an
alternative to the emancipation and relocation of all Blacks to
Africa: gradual emancipation of all newly-born Blacks, and their
transportation after a few years to the island of Santo Domingo.
Throughout his public life, Jefferson held true to his concept of
humane racial separation which he summed up in his Notes on the State
of Virginia (1781, Query XIV):
"Among the Romans emancipation required but one effort. The slave,
when made free, might mix with, without staining the blood of his
master. But with us a second is necessary, unknown to history. When
freed, he is to be removed beyond the reach of mixture."
Modern Americans, particularly those with no or only a dim memory of
the Old America, are probably easy to fool in large numbers. That is
why the media liars and "educators" are able to get away with
twisting Jefferson's legacy until it is close to being the opposite
of Jefferson's actual views
Dave Heil
> Auschwitz: Myths and facts
> by Mark Weber
>
> Nearly everyone has heard of Auschwitz, the German wartime
> concentration camp where many prisoners-most of them Jewish-were
> reportedly exterminated, especially in gas chambers. Auschwitz is
> widely regarded as the most terrible Nazi extermination center. The
> camp's horrific reputation cannot, however, be reconciled with the
> facts.
Dave Heil
> On Mon, 4 May 2009 18:55:31 -0700, "David Eduardo"
> <da...@davideduardo.com> wrote:
>
>> "lorad" <lora...@cs.com> wrote in message
>> news:31ce7f17-3a99-4c65...@u10g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...
>>> Why should ANY american allow a foreign nation to invade the US and
>>> replace american culture with a mexican one?
>>>
>>> Who are these traitors?
>>>
>> What is "American Culture?"
>>
>> Hint: it is the mix of the cultures of all the different peoples who have
>> immigrated here over several centuries.
>
> America was founded and built by White people.
That's wrong. America was built by whites, blacks, Asians, Hispanics,
American Indians, Jews and other.
>
> Jefferson's lifelong advocacy of racial separatism is
> well-documented and undeniable. He desired that all Blacks be
> returned to Africa or, in the interest of practicality, shipped to
> the island of Santo Domingo in the Caribbean. Any interpretation of
> Jefferson's words which is in direct contradiction to his forcefully
> and repeatedly expressed beliefs on race is obviously an incorrect
> interpretation.
You can insist that anyone who questions your view of Jefferson is wrong
but the fact remains that Jefferson wrestled with the question of
slavery for decades. He or his brother fathered children by one of his
slaves. That is fact. Here's another: We have had forty-one
Presidents since Jefferson. Our current President is half-negro.
We're well beyond you and your ilk, Topaz.
Dave Heil
> On Mon, 4 May 2009 16:41:40 -0700 (PDT), Michael Ejercito
> <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On May 4, 4:08 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> Here is a quote from "The Battle for Berlin" by Joseph Goebbels:
>> Invading Russia did not work out too well for you guys.
>>
>
> The Nazis and Hitler Saved Us
> The really bad guys in World War 2 were the western allies, especially
> the Americans. The monumental blindness and stupidity, unmatched
> barbarism and sadism of America and Britain nearly brought a new Dark
> Age upon a world dominated, not by them, but by the Soviet Union and
> communism, Although the Nazis and fascists lost the war-their heroic
> struggle with hardly any resources against overwhelming odds allowed
> western civilization to survive. After 1945, it was the atomic bomb,
> far above and beyond everything else, which allowed the west to
> survive, even to this day-but before that, it was ADOLF HITLER who
> saved us. For that he deserves our eternal gratitude and admiration.
His grand plan is amply illustrated at the link below:
David Eduardo
"lorad" <lora...@cs.com> wrote in message news:987367b1-00c7-4f72-8961->
> are that the present explosion of the American economy has seen 2 million
> return home. In any case, of the 12 million, about 7 to 8 million are from
> Latin America, and about 6 million are from Mexico.
<Over 90% are from mexico...mexican citizens.
No, only about 60% of illegal aliens are Mexican.
<(Actually almost all are since they are allowed to pass through mexico
<before sneaking into the US)
In this context, "from" means the place or nation of origin, not points in
transit. And there is considerable data to the effect that 30% to 40% of
illegal aliens are visa overstays, who did not cross the US / Mexico border
ever.
And the estimates of illegals that have infiltrated into the US range
up to 32 million.
> In any event, "American Culture" has always been quite dynamic.
<And quite northern european.
Ah, the Italians, I see, are from northern Europe. And the 15% of the US
population that is Black is of norhtern European heritage, also? And Native
Americans, and the Spanish-descended folks of the Southwest who were there
before the purchase?
How about the growing percentage of Americans who trace their origins to
Asia?
> There was
> much of the German and Dutch in the original culture at the time of
> Independence. Add millions of Irish in the 1840's (a vastly higher
> percentage of the total nation that the few Mexicans today), more millions
> of Germans around 1880,
<All northern europeans who tooke the time to assimilate into the
<existing european culture that founded the US.
No, they mixed, not converted. Those that were here absorbed some of what
each group brought, while the newcomers learned from those here first.
> ...and many millions of Italians from the late 1800's
> through the start of W.W. II. Then there is the French influence in
> various
> parts of the country, from the Arcadians in Maine to the Bayous of
> Louisiana. And the Spanish influence from Texas to California.
<Europeans.
Is that a retraction? First they were "northern" Europeans, now they are
just European.
> Add the
> African cultural influences in everything from dress to music and food,
> and
> you have a melange of great influences, all of which joined to make the
> culture of the nation.
<All of whom have made 'The American Culture'.
"American culture" is not "made." That would assume a finished project. The
culture is constantly undergoing change, and will in the future.
> A few million folks from Mexico are just going to
> contribute a bit more...
<30 million illegal foreign invaders who are proclaiming a 're-
<conquest' of US territory by their mud-hut cultural adherents are
<simply *criminals* who have no right to even be on US territory.#)
<million illegal invaders are NOT 'a few folks'.
You overstate by a factor of over four.
> of course, we have had a Spanish speaking part of
> the US, Puerto Rico, since 1898, and no harm seems to have come from that.
<Puerto Rico is a foreign nation that is working for total
<independence.
Puerto Rico is a US Commonwealth, with full birthrights to American
citizenship, free transit within the nation, etc.
And the Puertorican Independence Party is so small it has not requalified
for ballot inclusion in the next elections. It polled around 1% of the vote.
A majority voted for the statehood party's candidates (PNP) and the
possibility of Puerto Rico petitioning to become a state is greater than
ever.
<The only reason it has not severed relations is because they receive
<huge amounts of welfare money from US taxpayers.
That is a crock. Puerto Ricans are US citizens, and less than a percent want
to change that.
<Personally, I think they should be forced to accept independece as
<currently they are just another non-productive parasitic drag on US
<taxpayer.
Next time you go to a drug store, remember that about half of the
prescription drugs sold in the US are made there.
<(We can only support so many free-loading 'latinos'; resources are
<finite)
For 111 years, Puerto Rico has been part of the US, and its people citizens
since 1917.
> Obviously, you don't get the fact that culture is not static.
<It is you has lacks an understanding of the value of culture.. US
<culture.
<You want to trash the current US cullture and replace it with a failed
<mexican one.
<You want to replace existing americans with mexican criminals.
A nation survives by constantly changing and trying to improve. New
influences create change, and the reason the US has survived so well is due
in no small part to the contribution of all manner of immigrants.
> < who are swarming into american towns and stealing US
> <taxpayer resources and jobs while speaking some sort of foreign
> <gobbledeegook language instead of English - which has been the common
> <language of americans since at least the Constitution was written.
>
> Actually, many languages have been spoken in the US for centuries.
<Minor languages have always benn spoken in private settings.
<The goobledeegook mexican language is spoken by huge segments of the
<invader community; many do not speak any english at all, and force
<their foreign language onto US citizens who (by law) are forced to
<attempt to communicate with them.
"Mexican" is a nationality, not a language. And during periods of time, huge
percentages of Americans spoke languages like Italian and German. In fact,
the highest percentage of foreign born persons in the population occured
during the decade starting in 1900!
<Be quiet, you liar and distorter of facts...
<I am far more knowledgable than you.
<You are to be a mere disinformation agent.
You have made errors ranging from nearly trippling the number of illegal
immigrants to the absurd claim about "northern Europeans" and saying
"Mexican" is a language.
>Let's start with all the
> Native American tongues,
<Since you cannot overcome the criminality of illegal invasion, you
<begin to repeat yourself with incoherent babble.
<Come back when you can talk sense again.
When something is allowed, pretty much unfettered, for decades it is hard to
call it illegal.
Don Gabacho
> "lorad" <lora...@cs.com> wrote in message news:987367b1-00c7-4f72-8961->
> The accepted figure for illegal aliens is around 12 million, and estimates
>> are that the present explosion of the American economy has seen 2 million
>> return home. In any case, of the 12 million, about 7 to 8 million are from
>> Latin America, and about 6 million are from Mexico.
>
> <Over 90% are from mexico...mexican citizens.
>
> No, only about 60% of illegal aliens are Mexican.
How? Even using your own figures. How, out of supposedly "12 million
illegals" can "6 million Mexicans" be "60% while more "Latin Americans, "7
to 8 million" be less of a percentage?
This is one of your "one plus one is not two" things again?
> <(Actually almost all are since they are allowed to pass through mexico
> <before sneaking into the US)
>
> In this context, "from" means the place or nation of origin,...
Lorad's point, not yours, is valid. Because the Mexican Government allows
that passage, it is the Mexican government responsible for their being in
the U.S.. The Mexican Government's consulates have even stated that their
consulates and services, including protection (racket) departments, are
open for Latin Americans.
> not points in
> transit. And there is considerable data to the effect that 30% to 40% of
> illegal aliens are visa overstays, who did not cross the US / Mexico border
> ever.
Then how did they get here? How does having a "visa" get them here without
crossing the border "ever"?
> And the estimates of illegals that have infiltrated into the US range
> up to 32 million.
>
>> In any event, "American Culture" has always been quite dynamic.
>
> <And quite northern european.
>
> Ah, the Italians, I see, are from northern Europe.
"Quite" does not mean "all."
> And the 15% of the US
> population that is Black is of norhtern European heritage, also? And Native
> Americans, and the Spanish-descended folks of the Southwest who were there
> before the purchase?
While certainly their "heritages" have added to a single American culture,
the foundation of the culture is not even "Northern European" per se rather
than English specifically. It is that language, that "heritage," that
heritage's dynamics and especially law which not only binds all Americans,
but also compels America.
> How about the growing percentage of Americans who trace their origins to
> Asia?
What about them? They adjust and assimilate or, like anyone else, they are
not Americans.
The fact is, there have almost always been Asians in the U.S.A.; and they
are Americans. Not Asians for having adjusted and assimilated.
Try telling them they are not Americans and instead any kind of separate
entity as you strive to have it for them and everyone else.
>> There was
>> much of the German and Dutch in the original culture at the time of
>> Independence. Add millions of Irish in the 1840's (a vastly higher
>> percentage of the total nation that the few Mexicans today), more millions
>> of Germans around 1880,
None of which, then or even today, allow themselves to be even governed by
"Germany," the "Netherlands" or "Ireland" as do Mexicans by Mexico City.
None of which, then or even today, have and adhere to dozens of Mexican
consulates or, respectively, its allied Latin American government's
similarly governing consulates.
None of which, then or even today, would tolerate such separate media as
Television, Azteca, etc. and its stooges, like you, propagandizing its
audiences to be separate from and even aggressive toward the very nation
and its culture which hosts them.
None of which, then or even today, would claim such preposterous notions
that colonists, willing or not or even witting or not, are somehow
"immigrants."
None of which, then or even today, would insist that such fundamental
conflicts of interest as dual citizenship is natural and even a right
instead of absolutely abhorrent to even the most crucial precepts of
justice.
> <All northern europeans who tooke the time to assimilate into the
> <existing european culture that founded the US.
>
> No, they mixed, not converted....
They 'assimilated' and did "convert" by leaving Old World notions of class
and national loyalties as left behind as the very governments and classes
which had once claimed them.
And were more than glad to do it.
> Those that were here absorbed some of what
> each group brought, while the newcomers learned from those here first.
Not to, or even want to, change the very fundamentals of the nation and its
culture which were, and for authentic immigrants, the very attraction for
which they not only came but would die defending---even against their
original nations and those nation's respective governments.
>> ...and many millions of Italians from the late 1800's
>> through the start of W.W. II. Then there is the French influence in
>> various
>> parts of the country, from the Arcadians in Maine to the Bayous of
>> Louisiana. And the Spanish influence from Texas to California.
>
> <Europeans.
>
> Is that a retraction? First they were "northern" Europeans, now they are
> just European.
Quit your nit-picking.
>> Add the
>> African cultural influences in everything from dress to music and food,
>> and
>> you have a melange of great influences, all of which joined to make the
>> culture of the nation.
>
> <All of whom have made 'The American Culture'.
>
> "American culture" is not "made." That would assume a finished project. The
> culture is constantly undergoing change, and will in the future.
>
>> A few million folks from Mexico are just going to
>> contribute a bit more...
>
> <30 million illegal foreign invaders who are proclaiming a 're-
> <conquest' of US territory by their mud-hut cultural adherents are
> <simply *criminals* who have no right to even be on US territory.#)
> <million illegal invaders are NOT 'a few folks'.
>
> You overstate by a factor of over four.
You attempt to disguise invasion.
>> of course, we have had a Spanish speaking part of
>> the US, Puerto Rico, since 1898, and no harm seems to have come from that.
>
> <Puerto Rico is a foreign nation that is working for total
> <independence.
>
> Puerto Rico is a US Commonwealth, with full birthrights to American
> citizenship, free transit within the nation, etc.
Yet "working for total independence."
There is nothing unusual with Hispanics being, as irrational as it is, that
conflictive. Even subversive.
> And the Puertorican Independence Party is so small it has not requalified
> for ballot inclusion in the next elections. It polled around 1% of the vote.
> A majority voted for the statehood party's candidates (PNP) and the
> possibility of Puerto Rico petitioning to become a state is greater than
> ever.
It is not even a matter of the U.S.A. not needing Puerto Rico, or even a
matter of the U.S.A. rejecting any petition for statehood rather than the
U.S.A. dissolving even the common-wealth relationship with Puerto Rico.
Simply dump independence on Puerto Rico whether Puerto Ricans think they
want it or not. Until they have independence for Puerto Rico, Puerto Ricans
will never appreciate the value independence is---particularly for
Americans. Like all Latin American nations, Puerto Rico really doesn't know
what Independence is.
There wars of independence were reactionary not liberating.
They fought to keep Old World Spain alive in the New World.
So? Have real independence for once. You can then form your pan-Hispanic
America from there. You can make Puerto Rico its very hub.
> <The only reason it has not severed relations is because they receive
> <huge amounts of welfare money from US taxpayers.
>
> That is a crock. Puerto Ricans are US citizens, and less than a percent want
> to change that.
Which has absolutely nothing to do with what their motivation is.
> <Personally, I think they should be forced to accept independece as
> <currently they are just another non-productive parasitic drag on US
> <taxpayer.
>
> Next time you go to a drug store, remember that about half of the
> prescription drugs sold in the US are made there.
So? Are the drug companies immobilized there. They can leave. If they want
to stay. No problemo.
> <(We can only support so many free-loading 'latinos'; resources are
> <finite)
>
> For 111 years, Puerto Rico has been part of the US, and its people citizens
> since 1917.
So? All dissolvable.
>> Obviously, you don't get the fact that culture is not static.
>
> <It is you has lacks an understanding of the value of culture.. US
> <culture.
> <You want to trash the current US cullture and replace it with a failed
> <mexican one.
> <You want to replace existing americans with mexican criminals.
>
> A nation survives by constantly changing and trying to improve. New
> influences create change, and the reason the US has survived so well is due
> in no small part to the contribution of all manner of immigrants.
There you go again. First of all, and as obvious as it is, Puerto Ricans
are not "U.S. citizens" because they "immigrated" to the U.S.A.. Gad!
While particularly Mexico's nationals, and Mexico City's allied Central
American nations's, are not "immigrants."
They are "colonists."
Tell me how many Puerto Ricans would claim two national citizenships with
the U.S.A. and Puerto Rico does not make sense but, instead, somehow makes
sense for Mexicans and other Latin Americans?
Tell me of even one Puerto Rican who actively resists that notion?
Tell me of even one Puerto Rican who even protects the value of U.S.
citizenship by rejecting that ludicrous and even subversive design?
>> < who are swarming into american towns and stealing US
>> <taxpayer resources and jobs while speaking some sort of foreign
>> <gobbledeegook language instead of English - which has been the common
>> <language of americans since at least the Constitution was written.
>>
>> Actually, many languages have been spoken in the US for centuries.
>
> <Minor languages have always benn spoken in private settings.
> <The goobledeegook mexican language is spoken by huge segments of the
> <invader community; many do not speak any english at all, and force
> <their foreign language onto US citizens who (by law) are forced to
> <attempt to communicate with them.
>
> "Mexican" is a nationality, not a language. And during periods of time, huge
> percentages of Americans spoke languages like Italian and German. In fact,
> the highest percentage of foreign born persons in the population occured
> during the decade starting in 1900!
Speaking a foreign language and insisting that the host nation must change
to accommodate for any one or number of foreign languages instead of those
speakers conform---assimilate---to the language of the nation are two very
different things.
When insisting on the nation's accommodation at the very behest and under
the direction of a foreign government, it is even invasive!
> <Be quiet, you liar and distorter of facts...
> <I am far more knowledgable than you.
> <You are to be a mere disinformation agent.
>
> You have made errors ranging from nearly trippling the number of illegal
> immigrants to the absurd claim about "northern Europeans" and saying
> "Mexican" is a language.
Your errors are as many if not more.
But "errors" are just that: "errors."
That is not what you ply however.
You ply the invasion of the U.S.A..
>>Let's start with all the
>> Native American tongues,
>
> <Since you cannot overcome the criminality of illegal invasion, you
> <begin to repeat yourself with incoherent babble.
> <Come back when you can talk sense again.
>
> When something is allowed, pretty much unfettered, for decades it is hard to
> call it illegal.
"Illegal." You just said it.
How "hard" was that?
Don Gabacho
> "Don Gabacho" <jpas...@nettaxi.com> wrote in message
> news:1ubgrf79p1rk7$.agrazj0ibunu.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On Tue, 5 May 2009 18:42:42 -0700, David Eduardo wrote:
>>>
>>> No, only about 60% of illegal aliens are Mexican.
>>
>> How? Even using your own figures. How, out of supposedly "12 million
>> illegals" can "6 million Mexicans" be "60% while more "Latin Americans, "7
>> to 8 million" be less of a percentage?
>
> There were, per best estimates, 11 to 12 million illegal aliens. About 8
> million are Hispanic, and 6 to 7 million are Mexican. The percentages,
> purposely rounded, are correct. The Mexican percentage of the total, itself
> an approximation, is around 60% (6 to 7 million out of 11 to 12 million
> yields a median of "about" 60%)
Then you meant: "About 8 million are Hispanic and, *of those Hispanics,* 6
to 7 million are Mexican." And, now, "The Mexican percentage of the total
OF HISPANICS..."
Now multiply those supposedly "best estimates" by three and the truth is
'best' approximated.
>> This is one of your "one plus one is not two" things again?
>
> Since it is now estimated that around 1.5 to 2 million illegal immigrants
> have gone back to their native countires, the numbers are even lower.
Even if true, and not even normal for the winter just past, such a figure
by itself means nothing except deliberate deception without being compared
to the numbers still coming in plus the numbers of anchor babies still
being born here: adding still to the sum total of all nationalized (in
1996) by Mexico's government and its allied Latin American nations.
>> Lorad's point, not yours, is valid. Because the Mexican Government allows
>> that passage, it is the Mexican government responsible for their being in
>> the U.S.. The Mexican Government's consulates have even stated that their
>> consulates and services, including protection (racket) departments, are
>> open for Latin Americans.
>
> All of us in LA must have missed that.
So? You did.
> The consulates are overburdened and
> underfinanced as it is...
Horseshit. The Mexican Government always claims it's "overburdened" and
even broke yet they are still opening new ones.
>In fact, it is very dangerous for Central Americans
> to transit through Mexico, as they are not liked...
They are not "disliked."
> and often robbed and beaten
> and worse.
True. Mexico being the extortion racket it is does not spare non-Mexicans
any more than both Mexicans and Central Americans returning to Mexico
having failed---as long instructed and even coerced---the Mexican
government's mission for them: the sending of U.S. cash dollars as
remittances to their respective governments for their dole-out in peso PLUS
the achieving of (dual) voting U.S. citizenship or, at the least, having
had anchor babies while stateside and remaining stateside.
The extortions of northbound Central Americans (well versed in the course
even mandated by the Mexican government for Mexicans, "Follow Me To
America') are not at all different than the tolls exacted by pirates from
ships passing through there territories. Eventually they are passed. For,
if they weren't, none would attempt the passage at all.
And it is precisely that piratism the Mexican government's factions, with
their so-called border guards (at both ends), police and even military
dedicates themselves; and, as already described, not or ever stop the
Central Americans (or anyone else) from entering Mexico for the price of
passage.
>> Then how did they get here? How does having a "visa" get them here without
>> crossing the border "ever"?
>
> Generally, the visa overstays came on tourist or student visas, and are not
> from Mexico. An Argentine or Kenyan or Korean overstay does not usually
> cross the US / Mexican border.
You have erased that which you are responding to: "...without crossing the
border EVER."
>>
>> While certainly their "heritages" have added to a single American culture,
>> the foundation of the culture is not even "Northern European" per se
>> rather
>> than English specifically. It is that language, that "heritage," that
>> heritage's dynamics and especially law which not only binds all Americans,
>> but also compels America.
>
> Not really. English is not really the language of England until fairly
> recent times, and England is such an amalgamation of peoples that your case
> is rather weak if you base it on the US being "English." Care to guess what
> percentage of Brits have a drop or two of Norman blood? Or how many of the
> Irish have Celtic blood from present day Galicia, Spain?
'Yes' "really." You are rationalizing for no other purpose than to serve,
essentially, Mexico City's agenda for the U.S.A..
>> The fact is, there have almost always been Asians in the U.S.A.; and they
>> are Americans. Not Asians for having adjusted and assimilated.
>>
>> Try telling them they are not Americans and instead any kind of separate
>> entity as you strive to have it for them and everyone else.
>
> My point is that assimilation is a give and take. Asians have influenced
> American culture, just as the Asians in the US have adapted to that culture.
You are waffling. Your point has never been "assimilation" or anything
about it.
>> None of which, then or even today, allow themselves to be even governed by
>> "Germany," the "Netherlands" or "Ireland" as do Mexicans by Mexico City.
>
> And that is just a monster of a lie. The majority of persons of Mexican
> heritage here want little to do with Mexico, as they had to leave that
> nation to make a better life. They care about family still there, but not
> about the government.
The "majority of Mexicans" (illegals) don't want anything to do with
Mexican Government not "Mexico" which (except for those either attached to
the Mexican Government or striving to ingratiate themselves to the Mexican
Government: the "legals") they (the illegals) never wanted to leave.
As do Mexico's "legals," they aspire to at least dual residencies
particularly if the Mexican Government is allowed, by the U.S. Government,
to persist with disallowing their returns to Mexico or, if returning,
returning unmolested for themselves and even families who had yet to arrive
in the U.S.A..
As it is, just as in Mexico, Mexicans cannot escape the Mexican government
in the U.S.A. any more than they could in Mexico. The Mexican government
has its numerous consulates, vigilantes and even enforcers in the U.S.A. as
it does in Mexico. Other than those Mexicans in Mexico still to be
exported, Mexicans stateside are targeted, even more than the rest of
Mexicans in Mexico, to tow the Mexican Government's line, remit cash U.S.
dollars for the dole-outs in pesos in Mexico, agitate for and achieve the
paramount mission of obtaining---as long instructed---voting (dual) U.S.
Citizenship of Mexico to be irresistibly controlled by Mexican Government.
To, in every way, shape and form serve the interests of Mexico's governing
elite or the Mexican Government even arrange their deportations back to
Mexico to suffer in Mexico even worse brutalities for themselves and
families than those originally meted out in Mexico to force their original,
so-called "immigrations."
>> None of which, then or even today, would insist that such fundamental
>> conflicts of interest as dual citizenship is natural and even a right
>> instead of absolutely abhorrent to even the most crucial precepts of
>> justice.
>
> Dual citizenship has existed for centuries. But what you are speaking of is
> dual nationality, not dual citizenship. Mexican law clearly distinguishes
> between the two, while in the US the words are nearly synonyms.
The Mexican Government instructs, expects and even commands its nationals
to come to the U.S.A. and become voting U.S. Citizens while their new U.S.
Citizens retain both Mexican nationality and voting Mexican Citizenship.
Even their children born in the U.S.A. to be Mexico's nationals.
>>
>> You attempt to disguise invasion.
>
> Immigration is not invasion. At one time, there were a igher percent of
> Italian nationals in the US than the current percent of Mexican nationals...
The deliberate "colonization" has yet again been described to you.
The "Italians" were authentic "immigrants" and not or ever "colonizers"
willingly or not or even wittinly or not.
Those authentic "immigrants," by there own rejection of Italy, Italian
nationality and Italian Government were no longer "Italian nationals" the
moment they left Italy and would certainly never allowed themselves to be
subjugated to any Italian Government's consulates stateside.
They came to be "Americans" not "Italians"!
You insult authentic immigrants to serve essentially Mexico City's sordid
agenda.
>>> Puerto Rico is a US Commonwealth, with full birthrights to American
>>> citizenship, free transit within the nation, etc.
>>
>> Yet "working for total independence."
>
> No, nearly nobody wants that... particularly after over a century of being
> part of the US. There are probably more white separatists than they are
> Puerto Rican independence partisans.
Always you are like a broken record.
>> It is not even a matter of the U.S.A. not needing Puerto Rico, or even a
>> matter of the U.S.A. rejecting any petition for statehood rather than the
>> U.S.A. dissolving even the common-wealth relationship with Puerto Rico.
>
> Legally not likely; Puerto Ricans are born US citizens with every right of
> every other citizen born here.
Always you are like a broken record.
>>> A nation survives by constantly changing and trying to improve. New
>>> influences create change, and the reason the US has survived so well is
>>> due
>>> in no small part to the contribution of all manner of immigrants.
>>
>> There you go again. First of all, and as obvious as it is, Puerto Ricans
>> are not "U.S. citizens" because they "immigrated" to the U.S.A.. Gad!
>
> It should be obvious even to an admitted drunk like you that I was not
> speaking of Puerto Ricans here,...
You were and I am.
> but of all the groups and nationalities and
> races and ethnicities that have contributed to the culture of this nation.
>
> Puerto Ricans migrate to the mainland, just like those from the dust bowl
> migrated to Califonia in faulkner's time.
>>
>>
>> Tell me how many Puerto Ricans would claim two national citizenships with
>> the U.S.A. and Puerto Rico does not make sense but, instead, somehow makes
>> sense for Mexicans and other Latin Americans?
>>
>> Tell me of even one Puerto Rican who actively resists that notion?
>
> There is no such thing as Puerto Rican citizenship, since Puerto Rico has
> roughly the status that Alaska and Hawaii had prior to becoming states and
> is not a country.
You advocate dual U.S. citizenships for Hispanics and yet avoid the
question for the sordid agenda of Mexico City.
Adios you "admitted" pendejo.
Michael Ejercito
by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
January 27, 2005
http://www.jeffjacoby.com/4996/a-factory-for-death
BY THE TIME the Soviet Army reached Auschwitz on Jan. 27, 1945 -- 60
years ago this week -- my father was no longer there. Ten days
earlier, the Nazis had evacuated about 67,000 of the death camp's
inmates, dispatching them on brutal forced marches to the west. My
father, then 19, was in a group sent into Austria. He ended up at the
concentration camp in Ebensee, near Mauthausen. Liberation there
didn't come until May 9, with the arrival of US soldiers from the 80th
Infantry Division.
My father had entered Auschwitz the previous spring, together with his
parents, his two brothers, and two of his three sisters. They, too,
were gone by the time the camp was liberated. Unlike my father, they
didn't leave on foot. They "left" through the chimney. For the
overwhelming majority of the more than 1.1 million Jews who were sent
to Auschwitz, there was no other exit.
Jews were not the only victims. Nearly 75,000 Poles, more than 20,000
Gypsies, 15,000 Soviets, and 10,000 members of other nationalities
were murdered at Auschwitz as well. The Nazis first used the camp, in
fact, as a prison for Polish dissidents, and Birkenau, the huge 1941
addition that became the main Auschwitz killing center, was originally
designed to hold Soviet POWs.
But beginning in the spring of 1942, Auschwitz became first and
foremost a slaughterhouse for Jews. From every corner of Europe, Jews
were sent there – from France in the west to Ukraine in the east, from
as far north as Norway and as far south as Greece. Many, like my
father and two of his siblings, were forced into slave labor, in the
expectation that the ghastly conditions and starvation rations would
kill them soon enough. But most of the Jews entering Auschwitz – like
my father's parents and his youngest brother and sister – were
murdered as soon as they arrived.
Auschwitz was a vast factory of death, the site of the greatest mass
murder in recorded history. Even now, two generations later, it is
almost impossible to grasp the scale on which the Nazis committed
homicide there. It is suggested by a detail: From 1942 to 1944, the
train platform in Birkenau was the busiest railway station in Europe.
It held that distinction despite the fact that, unlike every other
train station in the world, it saw only arrivals. No passengers ever
left.
But Auschwitz was not only a place of murder. It was also a place of
theft.
Jews were robbed of everything they owned – the luggage they came
with, the clothes on their backs, the hair on their heads, even the
gold in their teeth. The stolen goods were stored in 35 warehouses,
where they were sorted and packed for shipment to Germany. Before
fleeing in January 1945, the Nazis burned 29 of the warehouses, but in
just the six that remained, the Soviets found 348,820 men's suits,
836,255 dresses, and 43,525 pairs of shoes. There were seven
trainloads of bedding, waiting to be shipped. And 7.7 tons of human
hair. And that was merely what remained at the very end.
The very worst thing about Auschwitz was -- what? The staggering death
toll? The gas chambers disguised as showers, in which thousands of
naked Jews went daily to agonizing deaths? The endless cruelty and
torture? The diseases that ravaged those the Nazis didn't kill first?
Was it the inhuman medical experiments carried out by doctors like
Josef Mengele, such as the deliberate destruction of healthy organs,
or the sadistic abuse of twins and dwarfs? Was it the willing
exploitation of Jewish slave labor by German corporations? The tens of
thousands of murdered children and babies?
No.
The very worst thing about Auschwitz is that, for all its evil
immensity, it was only a fraction of the total. Even if it had never
been built, the Holocaust would still have been a crime without
parallel in human history. It would still have been something so
monstrous that a new word – genocide – would have had to be coined to
encompass it. Never before and never since has a government made the
murder of an entire people its central aim. And never before or since
has a government turned human slaughter into an international
industry, complete with facilities for transportation, selection,
murder, incineration. And none of it as a means to an end, but as an
end in itself: The reason for wiping out the Jews was so that the Jews
would be wiped out.
In the end, 6 million of them were killed. But only one-sixth died at
Auschwitz.
Michael Ejercito
> During World War Two the Germans put Jews and Communists in
> concentration camps.
>The USA locked also up the Japanese and their
> political opponents and for less reason.
And did NOT murder them.
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> German leaders believed in death before dishonor.
> They knew the
> allies were subhuman monsters:
Their Japanese allies were subhuman monsters just like them.
Read about the Rape of nanking and Unit 731.
Michael
Topaz
Filmed on location at the Auschwitz camp site in Poland, this stunning
video by Jewish-American investigator David Cole shows that the "gas
chamber" that has been displayed to hundreds of thousands of tourists
is actually a propaganda prop. Alicia, an official tour guide, assures
David Cole, on camera, that the "gas chamber" in the main camp that is
shown to visitors is in its original, unaltered state. Then Dr.
Franciszek Piper, head curator of the Auschwitz State Museum,
acknowledges to Cole that this "gas chamber" is actually a postwar
creation. This video also tackles other Holocaust claims, including
the "human soap" fable. Shows that fraudulent "proofs" of homicidal
gassings were produced after the end of World War II, and that
visitors to the Auschwitz camp site have been systematically deceived
for decades.
Topaz
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>by Jeff Jacoby
Jews are a race of liars. When they had Demjanjuk in Israel, Jews
were coming out of the woodwork to testify against him. They all lied.
>The Boston Globe
>January 27, 2005
>
>http://www.jeffjacoby.com/4996/a-factory-for-death
>
>BY THE TIME the Soviet Army reached Auschwitz on Jan. 27, 1945 -- 60
>years ago this week -- my father was no longer there. Ten days
>earlier, the Nazis had evacuated about 67,000 of the death camp's
>inmates, dispatching them on brutal forced marches to the west. My
>father, then 19, was in a group sent into Austria. He ended up at the
>concentration camp in Ebensee, near Mauthausen. Liberation there
>didn't come until May 9, with the arrival of US soldiers from the 80th
Why move a bunch of kikes around so much if the plan was to kill
them?
>Infantry Division.
>
>My father had entered Auschwitz the previous spring, together with his
>parents, his two brothers, and two of his three sisters. They, too,
>were gone by the time the camp was liberated. Unlike my father, they
>didn't leave on foot. They "left" through the chimney. For the
>overwhelming majority of the more than 1.1 million Jews who were sent
>to Auschwitz, there was no other exit.
Auschwitz was occupied by the Communists on January 27,1945. They
made reports about what they claim to have found. These initial
reports had not yet been adapted to allied propaganda. The reports
were published on February 1 and 2, 1945 in the Soviet propaganda
organ Pravda. Here are some things it said:
"the Germans in Auschwitz began to remove the traces of their
crimes"
"They leveled the burial grounds."
"They removed and destroyed all traces of the electric conveyer
system, where hundreds of people at one time were electrocuted."
"The stationary gas chambers in the east side of the camp were
remodeled."
"This huge death mill was equipped with the latest style of fascist
technology..."
The Communists did not even claim to have seen any killing
machines or rooms. Supposedly it was all destroyed or remodeled. They
did not allow the other allies to enter the camp, and they did not
supply any pictures or blueprints or any physical evidence.
Nevertheless, the United Press correspondent, Henry Shapiro,
obediently echoed the Soviets story.
The Soviets said that the Auschwitz complex was entirely a "murder
machine". There was not a single word to indicate that the camp was
part of the German armament industries, as we now know it clearly was.
Even if the Germans had "leveled" the alleged huge grave pits the
bodies would still be present. However anyone familiar with the matter
knows that in Auschwitz no large grave sites were ever found.
The Communists did not allow any inspection of the camps by foreign
observers for many months afterwards and their claims conflict with
what "holocaust experts" say today. Today the experts all talk of gas
chambers in Birkenau, a part of the camp far to the west. This is much
different from where the Communists initially claimed that they were.
The initial Communist reports also do not mention things that are
now claimed to have been there. There is no mention of a pile of
eyeglasses, or hair, or shoes. There is no mention of underground gas
chambers. There is no mention of "farmhouses" remodeled to be gas
chambers. There is no mention of the rivers clogged with human ashes.
Today tourists can go to Auschwitz and be shown a "gas chamber".
This is admitted by the experts not to be genuine.
Brian Harmon <har...@msg.ucsf.edu> wrote in article
<080620000051136373%har...@msg.ucsf.edu>...
"You're confusing Krema I with Kremas II-V. Krema I is a
reconstruction, this has never been a secret. Kremas II-V
are in their demolished state as they were left."
Charles Don Hall <cdhall...@erols.com> wrote in article
<8F4CB71B...@news.erols.com>...
"Certainly not! The word "fake" implies a deliberate attempt to
deceive.
"The staff of the Auschwitz museum will readily explain that the Nazis
tried to destroy the gas chambers in a futile attempt to conceal their
crimes. And they'll tell you that reconstruction was done later on. So
it
would be dishonest for me to call it a "fake". I'll cheerfully admit
that
it's a "reconstruction" if that makes you happy."
Topaz
Topaz
wrote:
>> America was founded and built by White people.
>
>That's wrong. America was built by whites, blacks, Asians, Hispanics,
>American Indians, Jews and other.
What a crock. America was built by Whites. Maybe they had Black
slaves in the South, but horses did a lot of work too. America was
created by Whites. Canada is also great because the Whites didn't mix
with the natives there either. In Mexico and the other countries to
the south, the Whites mixed with the natives, that's why those
countries are basket cases.
>
>You can insist that anyone who questions your view of Jefferson is wrong
>but the fact remains that Jefferson wrestled with the question of
>slavery for decades.
He was right to oppose slavery. He was also against race-mixing and
wanted the Blacks back in Africa.
> He or his brother fathered children by one of his
>slaves. That is fact.
No it's not a fact. It's something a Jew told you.
> Here's another: We have had forty-one
>Presidents since Jefferson. Our current President is half-negro.
>We're well beyond you and your ilk, Topaz.
"There's this hilarious disconnect in the sheeple brain, where they
have been progressively brainwashed over a forty year period into
believing that once they have committed suicide themselves, an
identical civilization will be left behind except with a different
demographic makeup. They will yank the white tablecloth out from under
the dinnerware and the society will remain standing, only
melanin-enriched but otherwise the same.
It's like white people all over the planet were each taking turns
shooting themselves in the head with the same gun, convinced when they
have all killed themselves they will leave the perfect society behind.
I've got bad news for you. What you think of as civilization is joined
at the hip with the Indo-European gene pool. It's not even like oil
and water because it's all an unbroken continuum.
Culture is gene expression. If enough Mexicans inhabit any area on the
planet, that area will look exactly like Mexico in short order.
There's no piece of land on Earth that has a special gas exuded by the
local soil that makes flush toilets, clean running water, air
conditioning and the rule of law. There's no geographic location that
has these properties inherently. Irregardless of whether they are
bright enough to see it and understand why, whites tend to terraform
their surroundings to reflect what is inside them. Everything they
take for granted as the human standard, is in fact a projection of
their own qualities out onto a world that by and large is completely
indifferent to them.
America has already slipped past the demographic failsafe point. There
ain't no going back. Just like the nation formerly known as Rhodesia,
you will hear all sorts of yammering and analysis and whining but
nothing can stop Rhodesia from becoming Zimbabwe once all the
Rhodesians leave. It's a done deal.
There's no legislation. There's no emergency action committee. There's
no orchestrated government reform program. There's no mission
statement. There's no declaration of goals or judicial decision. Once
you change the genetic composition of a country, that country will
come to reflect it's demographics, not the other way around.
I went to high school in Chicago. Trust me, thirty years ago it didn't
look like the background of that news report. That was back when
Chicago schools were the best in the country and had some of the
highest scholastic scores in the nation. Back then, next to nobody
dropped out, ever.
You can't keep the street lights working with only half a nation of
high school graduates. You can't find the manpower to keep the ATM
machines running, to keep the power plant maintained at the dam, to
keep the nuclear reactor running. You can't have good medical care
with no good doctors. You can't have bridges that don't collapse with
no engineers.
America is just like Rhodesia during desegregation. All those
Rhodesians who talked about the coming era of rainbow folk dancing and
singing hand-in-hand with their African friends playing little
ukeleles, where are they now? The wind howls. Tumbleweeds blow past.
Two rabid wild dogs fight over a human ribcage in the streets where
the electricity went off a decade ago and has never come back on.
Where are all those Rhodesians looking forward to an era of peace and
harmony now? Where are they? Answer me. Raped and left for dead.
They're all wormfood now. Their farms burned to the ground, their
children strangled, their wives gangraped and forced to run naked
screaming with burning tire necklaces.
Fools. Dust in the wind. Shot in the back of the head and left for the
buzzards in some ditch on the veldt long ago.
It doesn't matter if I'm the only human being out of six billion on
the planet who knows this. Irregardless of the forcible consensus,
this is the way it will come to pass. I will be demonstrated right and
they will turn out to have been catastrophically wrong. Wishing
otherwise never makes anything so.
In another ten years, Amerikwa will be utterly unrecognizable. I
predict that the first thing that will hit you no matter where you get
off a plane in that country will be the smell. Watch and see."
DonnaGiorno
Michael Ejercito
> by James Buchanan
>
> Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of
> political power and banned them from the legal profession. Germany
> went from devastating economic poverty in 1932 to full employment just
> a couple years later. If an incredible economic improvement can be
> achieved, merely by removing the Jews from power (and replacing them
> with patriotic nationalists), then every Gentile nation in the world
> should give this a try.
>
Michael
Dave Heil
> On Wed, 06 May 2009 01:28:33 +0000, Dave Heil <k8...@frontiernet.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>>> America was founded and built by White people.
>> That's wrong. America was built by whites, blacks, Asians, Hispanics,
>> American Indians, Jews and other.
>
> What a crock. America was built by Whites.
Nope. There were free blacks in business up north. There were Chinese
building railroads in the west and planting rice in the southeast.
There were Jewish merchants and bankers and factory owners in the north
but also in the south. There were Lebanese storekeepers and bakers.
There were steelworkers from Spain.
> Maybe they had Black
> slaves in the South, but horses did a lot of work too.
Did horses pick cotton? Did horses produce a George Washington Carver?
> America was
> created by Whites.
Nope. Nice try, but it simply isn't true.
> Canada is also great because the Whites didn't mix
> with the natives there either.
The French mixed freely with negroes in the south and with Indians
everywhere. Spaniards also mixed with Indians. Take it as gospel,
Topie. It's true. It doesn't matter. We all left Africa as one group.
In Mexico and the other countries to
> the south, the Whites mixed with the natives, that's why those
> countries are basket cases.
Is it? Did you ever notice that the closer a country is to the Equator,
the slower the pace of life?
>> You can insist that anyone who questions your view of Jefferson is wrong
>> but the fact remains that Jefferson wrestled with the question of
>> slavery for decades.
>
> He was right to oppose slavery. He was also against race-mixing and
> wanted the Blacks back in Africa.
He wrestled with the question. What happened to Jefferson's slaves upon
his death?
>> He or his brother fathered children by one of his
>> slaves. That is fact.
>
> No it's not a fact.
Yes, Topie, it is fact. Surviving *white* Jefferson descendents finally
consented to DNA tests. Blacks claiming to be descendents of Jefferson
were tested. The Jefferson DNA was present in them.
It's something a Jew told you.
It wouldn't have been any less true if it had been, but I have both read
extensively on the topic and have seen documentaries.
>> Here's another: We have had forty-one
>> Presidents since Jefferson. Our current President is half-negro.
>> We're well beyond you and your ilk, Topaz.
>
>
> "There's this hilarious disconnect in the..."
Topie is simply speechless.
Dave Heil
Michael Ejercito
> On Wed, 6 May 2009 06:56:21 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >January 27, 2005
>
> >http://www.jeffjacoby.com/4996/a-factory-for-death
>
> >BY THE TIME the Soviet Army reached Auschwitz on Jan. 27, 1945 -- 60
> >years ago this week -- my father was no longer there. Ten days
> >earlier, the Nazis had evacuated about 67,000 of the death camp's
> >inmates, dispatching them on brutal forced marches to the west. My
> >father, then 19, was in a group sent into Austria. He ended up at the
> >concentration camp in Ebensee, near Mauthausen. Liberation there
> >didn't come until May 9, with the arrival of US soldiers from the 80th
>
> Why move a bunch of kikes around so much if the plan was to kill
> them?
>
> >Infantry Division.
>
> >My father had entered Auschwitz the previous spring, together with his
> >parents, his two brothers, and two of his three sisters. They, too,
> >were gone by the time the camp was liberated. Unlike my father, they
> >didn't leave on foot. They "left" through the chimney. For the
> >overwhelming majority of the more than 1.1 million Jews who were sent
> >to Auschwitz, there was no other exit.
>
> Auschwitz was occupied by the Communists on January 27,1945. They
> made reports about what they claim to have found. These initial
> reports had not yet been adapted to allied propaganda.
So what happened to Jeff Jacoby's uncles and aunts?
Michael
Dave Heil
>
> During World War Two the Germans put Jews and Communists in
> concentration camps. The USA locked also up the Japanese and their
> political opponents and for less reason. At the end of the war there
> was a lot of deaths in the German camps from disease and starvation
> because Germany was being bombed to rubble. There is no evidence that
> the Germans had gas chambers or an extermination plan.
Here, Topie, you asked for it. This can be viewed online or downloaded
for free. It is a large file at 2 GB for the MPEG-2.
http://www.archive.org/details/nazi_concentration_camps
This one is an American Newsreel from Universal. It is graphic.
The file is much smaller than the first.
http://www.archive.org/details/1945-04-26_Nazi_Murder_Mills
Every time you post more of your outrageous lies, you can expect to see
such a link.
Dave Heil
Dave Heil
>
> During World War Two the Germans put Jews and Communists in
> concentration camps. The USA locked also up the Japanese and their
> political opponents and for less reason. At the end of the war there
> was a lot of deaths in the German camps from disease and starvation
> because Germany was being bombed to rubble. There is no evidence that
> the Germans had gas chambers or an extermination plan.
Here, Topie, you asked for it. This can be viewed online or downloaded
Topaz
wrote:
>Topaz wrote:
I don't bother with Jew links. If you have something to say you can
try putting it directly in your post.
Here is part of the Leuchter Report:
"Thirty-one samples were selectively removed from the alleged gas
chambers at Kremas I, II, III, IV and V. A control sample was taken
from delousing facility #1 at Birkenau. The control sample was removed
from a delousing chamber in a location where cyanide was known to have
been used and was apparently present as blue staining. Chemical
testing of the control sample #32 showed a cyanide content of 1050
mg/kg, a very heavy concentration. The conditions at areas from which
these samples were taken are identical with those of the control
sample, cold, dark, and wet. Only Kremas IV and V differed, in the
respect that these locations had sunlight (the buildings have been
torn down) and sunlight may hasten the destruction of uncomplexed
cyanide. The cyanide combines with the iron in the mortar and brick
and becomes ferric-ferro-cyanide or prussian blue pigmentation, a very
stable iron-cyanide complex.
"The locations from which the analyzed samples were removed are set
out in Table III.
"It is notable that almost all the samples were negative and that the
few that were positive were very close to the detection level
(1mg/kg); 6.7 mg/kg at Krema III; 7.9 mg/kg at Krerma I. The absense
of any consequential readings at any of the tested locations as
compared to the control sample reading 1050 mg/kg supports the
evidence that these facilities were not execution gas chambers. The
small quantities detected would indicate that at some point these
buildings were deloused with Zyklon B - as were all the buildings at
all these facilities"
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
Topaz
wrote:
>Topaz wrote:
by Theodore J. O'Keefe
Nothing has been more effective in establishing the authenticity of
the Holocaust story in the minds of Americans than the terrible scenes
US troops discovered when they entered German concentration camps at
the close of World War II.
At Dachau, Buchenwald, Dora, Mauthausen, and other work and detention
camps, horrified US infantrymen encountered heaps of dead and dying
inmates, emaciated and diseased. Survivors told them hair-raising
stories of torture and slaughter, and backed up their claims by
showing the GIs crematory ovens, alleged execution gas chambers,
supposed implements of torture, and even shrunken heads and
lampshades, gloves, and handbags purportedly made from skin flayed
from dead inmates.
US government authorities, mindful that many Americans who remembered
the atrocity stories fed them during World War I still doubted the
Allied propaganda directed against the Hitler regime, resolved to
"document" what the GIs had found in the camps. Prominent newsmen
and politicians were flown in to see the harrowing evidence, while
the US Army Signal Corps filmed and photographed the scenes for
posterity. Famous journalist Edward R. Murrow reported, in tones of
horror, but no longer of disbelief, what he had been told and shown,
and Dachau and
Buchenwald were branded on the hearts and minds of the American
populace as names of infamy unmatched in the sad and bloody history
of this planet.
For Americans, what was "discovered" at the camps -- the dead and the
diseased, the terrible stories of the inmates, all the props of
torture and terror -- became the basis not simply of a transitory
propaganda campaign but of the conviction that, yes, it was true: the
Germans did exterminate six million Jews, most of them in lethal gas
chambers.
What the GIs found was used, by way of films that were mandatory
viewing for the vanquished populace of Germany, to "re-educate" the
German people by destroying their national pride and their will to a
united, independent national state, imposing in their place
overwhelming feelings of collective guilt and political impotence.
And when the testimony, and the verdict, of the Nuremberg Tribunal
incorporated most, if not all, of the horror stories Americans were
told about
Dachau, Buchenwald, and other places captured by the US Army, the
Holocaust could pass for one of the most documented, one of the most
authenticated, one of the most proven historical episodes in the
human record.
A Different Reality
But it is known today that, very soon after the liberation of the
camps, American authorities were aware that the real story of the
camps was quite different from the one in which they were coaching
military public information officers, government spokesmen,
politicians, journalists, and other mouthpieces.
When American and British forces overran western and central Germany
in the spring of 1945, they were followed by troops charged with
discovering and securing any evidence of German war crimes.
Among them was Dr. Charles Larson, one of America's leading forensic
pathologists, who was assigned to the US Army's Judge Advocate
General's Department. As part of a US War Crimes Investigation Team,
Dr. Larson performed autopsies at Dachau and some twenty other German
camps, examining on some days more than 100 corpses. After his grim
work at Dachau, he was
questioned for three days by US Army prosecutors.
Dr. Larson's findings? In an 1980 newspaper interview he said: "What
we've heard is that six million Jews were exterminated. Part of that
is a hoax." And what part was the hoax? Dr. Larson, who told his
biographer that to his knowledge he "was the only forensic pathologist
on duty in the entire European Theater" of Allied military operations,
confirmed that "never was a case of poison gas uncovered."
Typhus, Not Poison Gas
If not by gassing, how did the unfortunate victims at Dachau,
Buchenwald and Bergen-Belsen perish? Were they tortured to death or
deliberately starved? The answers to these questions are known as
well.
As Dr. Larson and other Allied medical men discovered, the chief
cause of death at Dachau, Belsen and the other camps was disease,
above all typhus, an old and terrible scourge of mankind that until
recently flourished in places where populations were crowded together
in circumstances where public health measures were unknown or had
broken down. Such was the case in the overcrowded internment camps in
Germany at war's end, where, despite such measures as systematic
delousing, quarantine of the sick and cremation of the dead, the
virtual
collapse of Germany's food, transport, and public health systems led
to catastrophe.
Perhaps the most authoritative statement of the facts as to typhus and
mortality in the camps has been made by Dr. John E. Gordon, M.D.,
Ph.D., a professor of preventive medicine and epidemiology at the
Harvard University School of Public Health, who was with US forces in
Germany in 1945. Dr. Gordon reported in 1948 that "The outbreaks in
concentration camps and prisons made up the great bulk of typhus
infection encountered in Germany." Dr. Gordon summarized the causes
for the outbreaks as follows:
Germany in the spring months of April and May [1945] was an
astounding sight, a mixture of humanity travelling this way and that,
homeless, often hungry and carrying typhus with them ...Germany was in
chaos. The destruction of whole cities and the path left by advancing
armies produced a disruption of living conditions contributing to the
spread of the disease. Sanitation was low grade, public utilities were
seriously disrupted, food supply and food distribution was poor,
housing was inadequate and order and discipline were everywhere
lacking. Still more important, a shifting of populations was occurring
such as few countries and few times have experienced.
Dr. Gordon's findings are corroborated by Dr. Russell Barton, today a
psychiatrist of international repute, who entered Bergen-Belsen with
British forces as a young medical student in 1945. Barton, who
volunteered to care for the diseased survivors, testified under sworn
oath in a Toronto courtroom in 1985 that "Thousands of prisoners who
died at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp during World War II
weren't deliberately starved to death but died from a rash of
diseases."
Dr. Barton further testified that on entering the camp he had credited
stories of deliberate starvation but decided such stories were untrue
after inspecting the well equipped kitchens and the meticulously
maintained ledgers, dating back to 1942, of food cooked and dispensed
each day.
Despite noisily publicized claims and widespread popular notions to
the contrary, no researcher has been able to document a German policy
of extermination through starvation in the German camps.
No 'Human Skin' Lampshades
What of the ghoulish stories of concentration camp inmates skinned for
their tattoos, flayed to make lampshades and handbags, or other
artifacts? What of the innumerable "torture racks," "meathooks,"
whipping posts, gallows, and other tools of torment and death that are
reported to have abounded at every German camp? These allegations, and
even more grotesque ones proffered by Soviet prosecutors, found their
way into the record at Nuremberg.
The lampshade and tattooed-skin charges were made against Ilse Koch,
dubbed by journalists the "Bitch of Buchenwald," who was reported to
have furnished her house with objects manufactured from the tanned
hides of luckless inmates.
But General Lucius Clay, military governor of the US zone of occupied
Germany, who reviewed her case in 1948, told his superiors in
Washington: "There is no convincing evidence that she [Ilse Koch]
selected inmates for extermination in order to secure tattooed skins
or that she possessed any articles made of human skin." In an
interview General Clay gave years later, he stated about the material
for the infamous lampshades: "Well, it turned out actually that it was
goat flesh. But
at the trial it was still human flesh. It was almost impossible for
her to have gotten a fair trial." Ilse Koch hanged herself in a German
jail in 1967.
It would be tedious to itemize and refute the thousands of bizarre
claims as to Nazi atrocities. That there were instances of German
cruelty, however, is clear from the testimony of Dr. Konrad Morgen, a
legal investigator attached to the Reich Criminal Police, whose
statements on the witness stand at Nuremberg have never been
challenged by proponents of the Jewish Holocaust story. Dr. Morgen
informed the court that he had been given full authority by Heinrich
Himmler,
commander of Hitler's SS and the dread Gestapo, to enter any German
concentration camp and investigate instances of cruelty and corruption
on the part of camp personnel. As he explained in sworn testimony at
Nuremberg, Dr. Morgen investigated 800 such cases, resulting in more
than 200 convictions. Punishments included the death penalty for the
worst offenders, including Hermann Florstedt, commandant of Lublin
(Majdanek), and Karl Koch (Ilse's husband), commandant of Buchenwald.
While German camp commandants in certain cases did inflict physical
punishment, such acts had to be approved by authorities in Berlin, and
it was required that a camp physician first certify the good health of
the prisoner to be disciplined, and then be on hand at the actual
beating. After all, throughout most of the war the camps were
important centers of industrial activity. The good health and morale
of the prisoners was critical to the German war effort, as is
evidenced in a January 1943 order issued by SS General Richard Gl�cks,
chief of the office that supervised the
concentration camps. It held the camp commanders "personally
responsible for exhausting every possibility to preserve the physical
strength of the detainees." Camp Survivors: Merely Victims?
US Army investigators, working at Buchenwald and other camps, quickly
ascertained what was common knowledge among veteran inmates: that the
worst offenders, the cruelest denizens of the camps, were not the
guards but the prisoners themselves. Common criminals of the same
stripe as those who populate US prisons today committed many
villainies, particularly when they held positions of authority, and
fanatical Communists, highly organized to combat their many
political enemies among the inmates, eliminated their foes with
Stalinist ruthlessness. Two US Army investigators at Buchenwald, Egon
W. Fleck and Edward A. Tenenbaum, carefully investigated circumstances
in the camp before its liberation. In a detailed report submitted to
their superiors, they revealed, in the words of Alfred Toombs, their
commander, who wrote a preface to the report, "how the prisoners
themselves organized a deadly terror within the Nazi terror."
Fleck and Tenenbaum described the power exercised by criminals and
Communists as follows:
The trusties, who in time became almost exclusively Communist
Germans, had the power of life and death over all other inmates. They
could sentence a man or a group to almost certain death ... The
Communist trusties were directly responsible for a large part of the
brutalities at Buchenwald.
Colonel Donald B. Robinson, chief historian of the American military
government in Germany, summarized the Fleck-Tenenbaum report in an
article published in an American magazine shortly after the war.
Colonel Robinson wrote succinctly of the American investigators'
findings: "It appeared that the prisoners who agreed with the
Communists ate; those who didn't starved to death."
Additional corroboration of inmate brutality has been provided by
Ellis E. Spackman, who, as Chief of Counter-Intelligence Arrests and
Detentions for the US Seventh Army, was involved in the liberation of
Dachau. Spackman, later a professor of history at San Bernardino
Valley College in California, wrote in 1966 that at Dachau "the
prisoners were the actual instruments that inflicted the barbarities
on their fellow prisoners."
'Gas Chambers'
In December 1944 US Army officers Colonel Paul Kirk and Lt. Colonel
Edward J. Gully inspected the German concentration camp at
Struthof-Natzweiler in Alsace. They submitted their findings to their
superiors at the headquarters of the US 6th Army Group, which
subsequently forwarded their report to the US War Crimes Division.
While, significantly, the full text of their report has never been
published, it has been revealed, by a historian supportive of
Holocaust claims, that the two investigators were careful to
characterize equipment exhibited to them by French informants as a
"so-called lethal gas chamber," and to claim it was "allegedly used as
a lethal gas chamber." (Emphasis added)
Both the careful phraseology of the Natzweiler report, and its
effective suppression, stand in stark contrast to the credulity, the
confusion, and the blaring publicity that accompanied official reports
of alleged gas chambers at Dachau. At first, a US Army photo depicting
a GI gazing at a steel door marked with a skull and crossbones and the
German words for: "Caution! Gas! Mortal danger! Don't open!," was
identified as showing the murder weapon.
Later, however, it was evidently decided that the apparatus in
question was merely a standard delousing chamber for clothing, and
another alleged gas chamber, this one cunningly disguised as a shower
room, was exhibited to American congressmen and journalists as the
site where thousands breathed their last. While there exist numerous
reports in the press as to the operation of this second "gas chamber,"
no official report by trained Army investigators has yet surfaced to
reconcile such problems as the function of the shower heads: Were they
"dummies," or did lethal cyanide gas stream through them? (Each theory
has appreciable support in journalistic and
historiographical literature.)
As with Dachau, so with Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen, and the other camps
liberated by the Allies in western Germany. There was no end of
propaganda about "gas chambers," "gas ovens," and the like, but so far
not a single detailed description of the murder weapon and its
function, not a single report of the kind that is mandatory for the
successful prosecution of any assault or murder case in America at
that time and today, has come to light.
Furthermore, a number of Holocaust authorities have now publicly
decreed that there were no gassings, no extermination camps in Germany
after all. (We are now told that "gassing" and "extermination" camps
were located exclusively in what is now Poland, in areas captured by
the Soviet Red Army and made off-limits to western investigators.)
Dr. Martin Broszat of the Munich-based Institute for Contemporary
History, which is funded by the German government, stated
categorically in a 1960 letter to the German weekly Die Zeit: "Neither
in Dachau nor in Bergen-Belsen nor in Buchenwald were Jews or other
prisoners gassed." Professional "Nazi hunter" Simon Wiesenthal stated
in 1975 and again in 1993 that "there were no
extermination camps on German soil."
Dachau "gas chamber" No. 2, which was once presented to a stunned and
grieving world as a weapon that claimed hundreds of thousands of
lives, is now described in the brochure issued to tourists at the
modern Dachau "memorial site" in these words: "This gas chamber,
camouflaged as a shower room, was not used."
The Propaganda Intensifies
More than 50 years after American troops entered Dachau, Buchenwald
and other German camps, and trained American investigators established
the facts as to what had gone on in them, the government in
Washington, the entertainment media in Hollywood, and the print media
in New York continue to churn out millions of words and images
annually on the horrors of the camps and the infamy of the Holocaust.
Despite the fact that, with the exception of the defeated Confederacy,
no enemy of America has ever so suffered so complete and devastating
defeat as did Germany in 1945, the mass media and the politicians and
bureaucrats behave as if Hitler, his troops, and his concentration
camps continue to exist in an eternal present, and our opinion makers
continue to distort, through ignorance or malice, the facts about the
camps.
Time for the Truth
It is time that the government and the professional historians reveal
the facts about Dachau, Buchenwald and the other camps. It is time
they let the American public know how the inmates died, and how they
didn't die. It is time that the claims of mass murder by gassing are
clarified and investigated in the same manner as any other claims of
murder. It is time that the free ride certain groups have enjoyed as
the result of unchallenged Holocaust claims be terminated, just as it
is time to end the scapegoating of other groups, including Germans,
eastern Europeans, the
Roman Catholic hierarchy, and the wartime leadership of America and
Britain, either for their alleged role in the Holocaust or their
supposed failure to stop it.
Above all, it is time that the citizens of this great Republic have
the facts about the camps, facts they have a right to know, a right
that is fundamental to the exercise of their authority and their will
in the governance of their country. As citizens and as taxpayers,
Americans of all ethnic backgrounds, of all faiths, have a basic right
and an overriding interest in determining the facts of incidents that
are deemed by those in positions of power to be significant in
determining America's foreign and educational policy, as well as its
selection of past events to be memorialized in our
civic life.
Today the alleged facts of the Holocaust are at issue all over the
civilized world. The truth will be decided only by recourse to the
facts, in the public forum: not by concealing the facts, denying the
truth, stonewalling reality. The truth will out, and it is time the
government of this country, and governments and international bodies
throughout the world, make public the evidence of what actually
transpired in the German concentration camps in the years 1933-1945,
so that we may put paid to the lies, without fear or favor, and carry
out the work of reconciliation and renewal that is and must be the
granite foundation of mutual tolerance between peoples and of a peace
based on justice.
Summary
The conclusions of the early US Army investigations as to the truth
about the wartime German concentration camps have since been
corroborated by all subsequent investigators and can be summarized:
1.The harrowing scenes of dead and dying inmates were not the result
of a German policy of "extermination," but rather the result of
epidemics of typhus and other disease brought about largely by the
effects of Allied aerial attacks.
2.Stories of Nazi supercriminals and sadists who turned Jews and
others into handbags and lampshades for their private profit or
amusement were sick lies or diseased fantasies; indeed, the German
authorities punished corruption and cruelty on the part of camp
commanders and guards.
3.On the other hand, portrayals of the newly liberated inmates as
saints and martyrs of Hitlerism were quite often very far from the
truth; indeed, most of the brutalities inflicted on camp detainees
were the work of their fellow prisoners, in contravention of German
policy and German orders.
4.The alleged homicidal showers and gas chambers were used either for
bathing camp inmates or delousing their clothes; the claim that they
were used to murder Jews or other human beings is a contemptible
fabrication. Orthodox historians and professional "Nazi-hunters" have
quietly dropped claims that inmates were gassed at Dachau, Buchenwald
and other camps in Germany. They continue, however, to keep silent
regarding the lies about Dachau and Buchenwald, as well as to evade an
open discussion of the evidence for homicidal gassing at Auschwitz and
the
other camps captured by the Soviets.
Institute For Historical Review
Post Office Box 2739
Newport Beach, California 92659
Topaz
by Theodore J. O'Keefe
A Different Reality
Typhus, Not Poison Gas
No 'Human Skin' Lampshades
'Gas Chambers'
The Propaganda Intensifies
Time for the Truth
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
Topaz
wrote:
>Nope. There were free blacks in business up north. There were Chinese
>building railroads in the west and planting rice in the southeast.
>There were Jewish merchants and bankers and factory owners in the north
>but also in the south. There were Lebanese storekeepers and bakers.
>There were steelworkers from Spain.
In the sixties America was 90% White. Anyone who doesn't have his
head up a Jews aft end can see that America was built by White
people. But even it it wasn't, Whites should still want a country of
their own now.
>
>> Maybe they had Black
>> slaves in the South, but horses did a lot of work too.
>
>Did horses pick cotton? Did horses produce a George Washington Carver?
"Black Invention Myths
Perhaps you've heard the claims: Were it not for the genius and energy
of African-American inventors, we might find ourselves in a world
without traffic lights, peanut butter, blood banks, light bulb
filaments, and a vast number of other things we now take for granted
but could hardly imagine life without.
Such beliefs usually originate in books or articles about black
history. Since many of the authors have little interest in the
history of technology outside of advertising black contributions to
it, their stories tend to be fraught with misunderstandings, wishful
thinking, or fanciful embellishments with no historical basis. The
lack of historical perspective leads to extravagant overestimations of
originality and importance: sometimes a slightly modified version of a
pre-existing piece of technology is mistaken for the first invention
of its type; sometimes a patent or innovation with little or no
lasting value is portrayed as a major advance, even if there's no real
evidence it was ever used.
Unfortunately, some of the errors and exaggerations have acquired an
illusion of credibility by repetition in mainstream outlets,
especially during Black History Month (see examples for the traffic
light and ironing board). When myths go unchallenged for too long,
they begin to eclipse the truth. Thus I decided to put some records
straight. Although this page does not cover every dubious invention
claim floating around out there, it should at least serve as a warning
never to take any such claim for granted. Each item below is listed
with its supposed black originator beneath it along with the year it
was supposedly invented, followed by something about the real origin
of the invention or at least an earlier instance of it.
Traffic Signal
Invented by Garrett A. Morgan in 1923? No!
The first known traffic signal appeared in London in 1868 near the
Houses of Parliament. Designed by JP Knight, it featured two semaphore
arms and two gas lamps. The earliest electric traffic lights include
Lester Wire's two-color version set up in Salt Lake City circa 1912,
James Hoge's system (US patent #1,251,666) installed in Cleveland by
the American Traffic Signal Company in 1914, and William Potts' 4-way
red-yellow-green lights introduced in Detroit beginning in 1920. New
York City traffic towers began flashing three-color signals also in
1920.
Garrett Morgan's cross-shaped, crank-operated semaphore was not among
the first half-hundred patented traffic signals, nor was it
"automatic" as is sometimes claimed, nor did it play any part in the
evolution of the modern traffic light. For details see Inventing
History: Garrett Morgan and the Traffic Signal.
Gas Mask
Garrett Morgan in 1914? No!
The invention of the gas mask predates Morgan's breathing device by
several decades. Early versions were constructed by the Scottish
chemist John Stenhouse in 1854 and the physicist John Tyndall in the
1870s, among many other inventors prior to World War I. See The
Invention of the Gas Mask.
Peanut Butter
George Washington Carver (who began his peanut research in 1903)? No!
Peanuts, which are native to the New World tropics, were mashed into
paste by Aztecs hundreds of years ago. Evidence of modern peanut
butter comes from US patent #306727 issued to Marcellus Gilmore Edson
of Montreal, Quebec in 1884, for a process of milling roasted peanuts
between heated surfaces until the peanuts reached "a fluid or
semi-fluid state." As the product cooled, it set into what Edson
described as "a consistency like that of butter, lard, or ointment."
In 1890, George A. Bayle Jr., owner of a food business in St. Louis,
manufactured peanut butter and sold it out of barrels. J.H. Kellogg,
of cereal fame, secured US patent #580787 in 1897 for his "Process of
Preparing Nutmeal," which produced a "pasty adhesive substance" that
Kellogg called "nut-butter."
George Washington Carver
"Discovered" hundreds of new and important uses for the peanut?
Fathered the peanut industry? Revolutionized southern US agriculture?
No!
Research by Barry Mackintosh, who served as bureau historian for the
National Park Service (which manages the G.W. Carver National
Monument), demonstrated the following:
a.. Most of Carver's peanut and sweet potato creations were either
unoriginal, impractical, or of uncertain effectiveness. No product
born in his laboratory was widely adopted.
b.. The boom years for Southern peanut production came prior to, and
not as a result of, Carver's promotion of the crop.
c.. Carver's work to improve regional farming practices was not of
pioneering scientific importance and had little demonstrable impact.
To see how Carver gained "a popular reputation far transcending the
significance of his accomplishments," read Mackintosh's excellent
article George Washington Carver: The Making of a Myth.
Automatic Lubricator, "Real McCoy"
Elijah McCoy revolutionized industry in 1872 by inventing the first
device to automatically oil machinery? No! The phrase "Real McCoy"
arose to distinguish Elijah's inventions from cheap imitations? No!
The oil cup, which automatically delivers a steady trickle of
lubricant to machine parts while the machine is running, predates
McCoy's career; a description of one appears in the May 6, 1848 issue
of Scientific American. The automatic "displacement lubricator" for
steam engines was developed in 1860 by John Ramsbottom of England, and
notably improved in 1862 by James Roscoe of the same country. The
"hydrostatic" lubricator originated no later than 1871.
Variants of the phrase Real McCoy appear in Scottish literature dating
back to at least 1856 - well before Elijah McCoy could have been
involved.
Detailed evidence: The not-so-real McCoy
Also see The Fake McCoy and Did Somebody Say McTrash?
Blood Bank
Dr. Charles Drew in 1940? No!
During World War I, Dr. Oswald H. Robertson of the US army preserved
blood in a citrate-glucose solution and stored it in cooled containers
for later transfusion. This was the first use of "banked" blood. By
the mid-1930s the Russians had set up a national network of facilities
for the collection, typing, and storage of blood. Bernard Fantus,
influenced by the Russian program, established the first hospital
blood bank in the United States at Chicago's Cook County Hospital in
1937. It was Fantus who coined the term "blood bank." See highlights
of transfusion history from the American Association of Blood Banks.
Blood Plasma
Did Charles Drew "discover" (in about 1940) that plasma could be
separated and stored apart from the rest of the blood, thereby
revolutionizing transfusion medicine? No!
The possibility of using blood plasma for transfusion purposes was
known at least since 1918, when English physician Gordon R. Ward
suggested it in a medical journal. In the mid-1930s, John Elliott
advanced the idea, emphasizing plasma's advantages in shelf life and
donor-recipient compatibility, and in 1939 he and two colleagues
reported having used stored plasma in 191 transfusions. (See
historical notes on plasma use.) Charles Drew was not responsible for
any breakthrough scientific or medical discovery; his main career
achievement lay in supervising or co-supervising major programs for
the collection and shipment of blood and plasma.
More: Charles Drew Mythology
Washington DC city plan
Benjamin Banneker? No!
Pierre-Charles L'Enfant created the layout of Washington DC. Banneker
assisted Andrew Ellicott in the survey of the federal territory, but
played no direct role in the actual planning of the city. The story of
Banneker reconstructing the city design from memory after L'Enfant ran
away with the plans (with the implication that the project would have
failed if not for Banneker) has been debunked by historians.
Filament for Light Bulb
Lewis Latimer invented the carbon filament in 1881 or 1882? No!
English chemist/physicist Joseph Swan experimented with a
carbon-filament incandescent light all the way back in 1860, and by
1878 had developed a better design which he patented in Britain. On
the other side of the Atlantic, Thomas Edison developed a successful
carbon-filament bulb, receiving a patent for it (#223898) in January
1880, before Lewis Latimer did any work in electric lighting. From
1880 onward, countless patents were issued for innovations in filament
design and manufacture (Edison had over 50 of them). Neither of
Latimer's two filament-related patents in 1881 and 1882 were among the
most important innovations, nor did they make the light bulb last
longer, nor is there reason to believe they were adopted outside Hiram
Maxim's company where Latimer worked at the time. (He was not hired by
Edison's company until 1884, primarily as a draftsman and an expert
witness in patent litigations).
Latimer also did not come up with the first screw socket for the light
bulb or the first book on electric lighting.
Heart Surgery (first successful)
Dr. Daniel Hale Williams in 1893? No!
Dr. Williams repaired a wound not in the heart muscle itself, but in
the sac surrounding it, the pericardium. This operation was not the
first of its type: Henry Dalton of St. Louis performed a nearly
identical operation two years earlier, with the patient fully
recovering. Decades before that, the Spaniard Francisco Romero carried
out the first successful pericardial surgery of any type, incising the
pericardium to drain fluid compressing the heart.
Surgery on the actual human heart muscle, and not just the
pericardium, was first successfully accomplished by Ludwig Rehn of
Germany when he repaired a wounded right ventricle in 1896. More than
50 years later came surgery on the open heart, pioneered by John
Lewis, C. Walton Lillehei (often called the "father of open heart
surgery") and John Gibbon (who invented the heart-lung machine).
What medical historians say...
"Third Rail"
Granville Woods in 1901? No!
Werner von Siemens pioneered the use of an electrified third rail as a
means for powering railway vehicles when he demonstrated an
experimental electric train at the 1879 Berlin Industrial Exhibition.
In the US, English-born Leo Daft used a third-rail system to electrify
the Baltimore & Hampden lines in 1885. The first electrically powered
subway trains, which debuted in London in the autumn of 1890, likewise
drew power from a third rail. Details...
Railway Telegraph
Granville Woods prevented railway accidents and saved countless lives
by inventing the train telegraph (patented in 1887), which allowed
communication to and from moving trains? No!
The earliest patents for train telegraphs go back to at least 1873.
Lucius Phelps was the first inventor in the field to attract
widespread notice, and the telegrams he exchanged on the New York, New
Haven & Hartford railroad in January 1885 were hailed in the Feb. 21,
1885 issue of Scientific American as "perhaps the first ever sent to
and from a moving train." Phelps remained at the forefront in
developing the technology and by the end of 1887 already
held 14 US patents on his system. He joined a team led by Thomas
Edison, who had been working on his "grasshopper telegraph" for
trains, and together they constructed on the Lehigh Valley Railroad
one of the only induction telegraph systems ever put to commercial
use. Although this telegraph was a technical success, it fulfilled no
public need, and the market for on-board train telegraphy never took
off. There is no evidence that any commercial railway telegraph based
on Granville Woods's patents was ever built. About the patent
interference case
Refrigerated Truck
Frederick Jones (with Joseph Numero) in 1938? No! Did Jones change
America's eating habits by making possible the long-distance shipment
of perishable foods? No!
Refrigerated ships and railcars had been moving perishables across
oceans and continents even before Jones was born (see refrigerated
transport timeline). Trucks with mechanically refrigerated cargo
spaces appeared on the roads at least as early as the late 1920s (see
the proof). Further development of truck refrigeration was more a
process of gradual evolution than radical change.
Air Brake / Automatic Air Brake
Granville Woods in 1904? No!
In 1869, a 22-year-old George Westinghouse received US patent #88929
for a brake device operated by compressed air, and in the same year
organized the Westinghouse Air Brake Company. Many of the 361 patents
he accumulated during his career were for air brake variations and
improvements, including his first "automatic" version in 1872 (US
#124404).
Air Conditioner
Frederick Jones in 1949? No!
Dr. Willis Carrier built the first machine to control both the
temperature and humidity of indoor air. He received the first of many
patents in 1906 (US patent #808897, for the "Apparatus for Treating
Air"). In 1911 he published the formulae that became the scientific
basis for air conditioning design, and four years later formed the
Carrier Engineering Corporation to develop and manufacture AC systems.
Airship
J.F. Pickering in 1900? No!
French engineer Henri Giffard successfully flew a powered navigable
airship in 1852. The La France airship built by Charles Renard and
Arthur Krebs in 1884 featured an electric motor and improved steering
capabilities. In 1900 Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin's first
rigid-framed dirigible took to the air. Of the hundreds of inventors
granted patents for early airship designs and modifications, few
succeeded in building or flying their craft. There doesn't appear to
be any record of a "Pickering Airship" ever getting off the ground.
US Aviation Patent Database, 1799-1909
Automatic Railroad Car Coupler
Andrew Beard invented the "Jenny [sic] coupler" in 1897? No!
The Janney coupler is named for US Civil War veteran Eli H. Janney,
who in 1873 invented a device (US patent #138405) which automatically
linked together two railroad cars upon their being brought into
contact. Also known as the "knuckle coupler," Janney's invention
superseded the dangerous link-and-pin coupler and became the basis for
standard coupler design through the remainder of the millennium.
Andrew Beard's modified knuckle coupler was just one of approximately
eight thousand coupler variations patented by 1900. See a history of
the automatic coupler and also The Janney Coupler.
Automatic Transmission/Gearshift
Richard Spikes in 1932? No!
The first automatic-transmission automobile to enter the market was
designed by the Sturtevant brothers of Massachusetts in 1904. US
Patent #766551 was the first of several patents on their gearshift
mechanism. Automatic transmission technology continued to develop,
spawning hundreds of patents and numerous experimental units; but
because of cost, reliability issues and an initial lack of demand,
several decades passed before vehicles with automatic transmission
became common on the roads.
Bicycle Frame
Isaac R. Johnson in 1899? No!
Comte Mede de Sivrac and Karl von Sauerbronn built primitive versions
of the bicycle in 1791 and 1816 respectively. The frame of John
Starley's 1885 "safety bicycle" resembled that of a modern bicycle.
Cellular Phone
Henry T. Sampson in 1971? No!
On July 6, 1971, Sampson and co-inventor George Miley received a
patent on a "gamma electric cell" that converted a gamma ray input
into an electrical output (Among the first to do that was Bernhard
Gross, US patent #3122640, 1964). What, you ask, does gamma radiation
have to do with cellular communications technology? The answer:
nothing. Some multiculturalist pseudo-historian must have seen the
words "electric" and "cell" and thought "cell phone."
The father of the cell phone is Martin Cooper who first demonstrated
the technology in 1973.
Clock or Watch (First in America)
Benjamin Banneker built the first American timepiece in 1753? No!
Abel Cottey, a Quaker clockmaker from Philadelphia, built a clock that
is dated 1709 (source: Six Quaker Clockmakers, by Edward C. Chandlee;
Philadelphia, The Historical Society of Pennsylvania, 1943). Banneker
biographer Silvio Bedini further refutes the myth:
Several watch and clockmakers were already established in the colony
[Maryland] prior to the time that Banneker made the clock. In
Annapolis alone there were at least four such craftsmen prior to 1750.
Among these may be mentioned John Batterson, a watchmaker who moved to
Annapolis in 1723;
James Newberry, a watch and clockmaker who advertised in the Maryland
Gazette on July 20, 1748; John Powell, a watch and clockmaker believed
to have been indentured and to have been working in 1745; and Powell's
master, William Roberts.
Silvio Bedini, The Life of Benjamin Banneker (Baltimore: Maryland
Historical Society, 1999)
Clothes Dryer
George T. Sampson in 1892? No!
The "clothes-drier" described in Sampson's patent was actually a rack
for holding clothes near a stove, and was intended as an "improvement"
on similar contraptions:
My invention relates to improvements in clothes-driers.... The object
of my invention is to suspend clothing in close relation to a stove by
means of frames so constructed that they can be readily placed in
proper position and put aside when not required for use.
US patent #476416, 1892
Nineteen years earlier, there were already over 300 US patents for
such "clothes-driers" (Subject-Matter Index of Patents...1790 to
1873).
A Frenchman named Pochon in 1799 built the first known tumble dryer -
a crank-driven, rotating metal drum pierced with ventilation holes and
held over heat. Electric tumble dryers appeared in the first half of
the 20th century.
Dustpan
Lloyd P. Ray in 1897? No!
While the ultimate origin of the dustpan is lost in the mists (dusts?)
of time, at least we know that US patent #20811 for "Dust-pan" was
granted to T.E. McNeill in 1858. That was the first of about 164 US
dustpan patents predating Lloyd Ray's. See the dustpan patent list.
Egg Beater
Willie Johnson in 1884? No!
The hand-cranked egg beater with two intermeshed, counter-rotating
whisks was invented by Turner Williams of Providence, Rhode Island in
1870 (US Patent #103811). It was an improvement on earlier rotary egg
beaters that had only one whisk.
Electric Trolley
Did Granville Woods invent the electric trolley car, the overhead wire
that powers it, or the "troller" wheel that makes contact with the
trolley wire, in 1888? No!
Dr. Werner von Siemens demonstrated his electric trolleybus, the
Elektromote, near Berlin on April 29, 1882. The vehicle's two electric
motors collected power through contact wheels rolling atop a pair of
overhead wires. The earliest patentee of an electric trolley in the
United States appears to be Eugene Cowles (#252193 in 1881), followed
by Dr. Joseph R. Finney (#268476 in 1882) who operated an experimental
trolley car near Pittsburgh, PA in the summer of 1882. In early 1885,
John C. Henry established in Kansas City, MO, the first overhead-wire
electric transit system to enter regular service in the United States.
Belgian-born Charles van Depoele, who earned 240+ patents in electric
railway technology and other fields, set up trolley lines in several
North American cities by 1887. In February 1888, a trolley system
designed by Frank Sprague began operating in Richmond, Virginia.
Sprague's system became the lasting prototype for electric street
railways in the US.
Elevator
Alexander Miles in 1887? No!
Was Miles the first to patent a self-closing shaft door? No!
Steam-powered hoisting devices were used in England by 1800. Elisha
Graves Otis' 1853 "safety elevator" prevented the car from falling if
the cable broke, and thus paved the way for the first commercial
passenger elevator, installed in New York City's Haughwout Department
Store in 1857. The first electric elevator appeared in Mannheim,
Germany in 1880, built by the German firm of Siemens and Halske. A
self-closing shaft door was invented by J.W. Meaker in 1874
("Improvement in Self-closing Hatchways," US Patent No.
147,853). See Elevator Timeline
Fastest Computer/Computation
Was Philip Emeagwali responsible for the world's fastest computer or
computation in 1989? Did he win the "Nobel Prize of computing"? Is he
a "father of the Internet"? No!
The fastest performance of a computer application in 1989 was 6
billion floating point operations per second (6 Gflops), achieved by a
team from Mobil and Thinking Machines Corp. on a 64,000-processor
"Connection Machine" invented by Danny Hillis. That was almost double
the 3.1 Gflops of Emeagwali's computation. Computing's Nobel Prize
equivalent is the Turing Award, which Emeagwali has never won. More...
Fire Escape
Joseph Winters in 1878? No!
Winters' "fire escape" was a wagon-mounted ladder. The first such
contraption patented in the US was the work of William P. Withey, 1840
(US patent #1599). The fire escape with a "lazy-tongs" type ladder,
more similar to Winters' patent, was pioneered by H�ttman and Kornelio
in 1849 (US patent #6155). One of the first fire escapes of any type
was invented in 18th-century England:
In 1784, Daniel Maseres, of England, invented a machine called a fire
escape, which, being fastened to the window, would enable anyone to
descend to the street without injury.
Benjamin Butterworth, Growth of Industrial Art, 1888
By 1888 the US had granted 1,099 patents on fire escapes of "many
forms, and of every possible material" (Butterworth).
Fire Extinguisher
Thomas J. Martin in 1872? No!
In 1813, British army captain George Manby created the first known
portable fire extinguisher: a two-foot-tall copper cylinder that held
3 gallons of water and used compressed air as a propellant. One of the
earliest extinguishers to use a chemical extinguishing agent, and not
just water, was invented in 1849 by the Englishman William Henry
Phillips, who patented his "fire annihilator" in England and the
United States (US patent #7,269).
Food Additives, Meat Curing
Lloyd Hall "is responsible for the meat curing products, seasonings,
emulsions, bakery products, antioxidants, protein hydrolysates, and
many other products that keep our food fresh and flavorable"? No! Hall
"revolutionized the meatpacking industry"? No!
Hall introduced no major class of additive, certainly not meat curing
salts (which are ancient), protein hydrolysates (popularized by Julius
Maggi as flavor enhancers in 1886), emulsifiers and antioxidants
(lecithin, for example, was used in both roles before Lloyd Hall had
any patents in food processing). The so-called revolutionary meat
curing product marketed by Hall's employer was invented primarily by
Karl Max Seifert?; the number of Seifert's patent was printed right on
the containers. Hall's main contribution to this product was to reduce
its tendency to cake during storage. Details: Lloyd Hall myth.
Fountain Pen
W.B. Purvis in 1890? No!
The first reference to what seems to be a fountain pen appears in an
Arabic text from 969 AD; details of the instrument are not known. A
French "Bion" pen, dated 1702, represents the oldest fountain pen that
still survives. Later models included John Scheffer's 1819 pen,
possibly the first to be mass-produced; John Jacob Parker's
"self-filling" pen of 1832; and the famous Lewis Waterman pen of 1884
(US Patents #293545, #307735). Early History of the Fountain Pen
Golf Tee
Dr. George Grant in 1899? No!
A small rubber platform invented by Scotsmen William Bloxsom and
Arthur Douglas was the world's first patented golf tee (British patent
#12941 of 1889). The first known tee to penetrate the ground, rather
than rest on the surface, was the peg-like "Perfectum" patented in
1892 by Percy Ellis of England. American dentist William Lowell
introduced the most common form of tee used today, the simple wooden
peg with a flared top. Details...
Hairbrush
Lyda Newman in 1898? No!
An early US patent for a recognizably modern hairbrush went to Hugh
Rock in 1854 (US Design Patent no. D645), though surely there were
hairbrushes long before there was a US Patent Office.
The claim that Lyda Newman's brush was the first with "synthetic
bristles" is false: her patent mentions nothing about synthetic
bristles and is concerned only with a new way of making the handle
detachable from the head. Besides, a hairbrush that included "elastic
wire teeth" in combination with natural bristles had already been
patented by Samuel Firey in 1870 (US, #106680). Nylon bristles weren't
possible until the invention of nylon in 1935.
Halogen Lamp
Frederick Mosby? No
The original patent for the tungsten halogen lamp (US #2,883,571;
April 21, 1959) is recorded to Elmer G. Fridrich and Emmett H. Wiley
of General Electric. The two had built a working prototype as early as
1953. Fred Mosby was part of the GE team charged with developing the
prototype lamp into a marketable product, but was not responsible for
the original halogen lamp or the concept behind it.
Hand Stamp
William Purvis in 1883? No!
The earliest known postal handstamp was brought into use by Henry
Bishop, Postmaster General of Great Britain, in the year 1661. The
stamp imprinted the mail with a bisected circle containing the month
and the date. See "Bishop marks"
Heating Furnace
Alice Parker in 1919? No!
In the hypocaust heating systems built by the ancient Romans, hot air
from a furnace circulated under the floor and up through channels
inside the walls, thereby distributing heat evenly around the
building. One of the most famous heating systems in recent centuries
was the iron furnace stove known as the "Franklin stove," named after
its purported originator Benjamin Franklin around 1745 AD. The US had
issued over 4000 patents for heating stoves and furnaces by 1888
(Benjamin Butterworth, Growth of Industrial Art, 1888).
Horseshoe
Oscar E. Brown in 1892? No!
Some sources on the web, if not ignorant enough to say Brown invented
the first horseshoe ever, will at least try to credit him for the
first double or compound horseshoe made of two layers: one permanently
secured to the hoof, and one auxiliary layer that can be removed and
replaced when it wears out. However, in the US there were already 39
earlier patents for horseshoes using that same concept. The first of
these was issued to J.B. Kendall of Boston in 1861, patent #33709.
Ice Cream
Augustus Jackson in 1832? No!
Flavored ices resembling sherbet were known in China in ancient times.
In Europe, sherbet-like concoctions evolved into ice cream by the 16th
century, and around 1670 or so, the Caf� Procope in Paris offered
creamy frozen dairy desserts to the public. The first written record
of ice cream in the New World comes from a letter dated 1700,
attesting that Maryland Governor William Bladen served the treat to
his guests. In 1777, the New York Gazette advertised the sale of ice
cream by confectioner Philip Lenzi. History of Ice Cream
Ironing Board
Sarah Boone in 1892? No!
Of the several hundred US patents on ironing boards granted prior to
Sarah Boone's, the first three went to William Vandenburg in 1858
(patents #19390, #19883, #20231). The first American female patentee
of an ironing board is probably Sarah Mort of Dayton, Ohio, who
received patent #57170 in 1866. In 1869, Henry Soggs of Columbus,
Pennsylvania earned US patent #90966 for an ironing board resembling
the modern type, with folding legs, adjustable height, and a cover.
Another nice example of a modern-looking board was designed by J.H.
Mallory in 1871, patent #120296. Details...
Laser Cataract Surgery
Patricia Bath "transformed eye surgery" by inventing the first laser
device to treat cataracts in 1986? No!
Use of lasers to treat cataracts in the eye began to develop in the
mid 1970s. M.M. Krasnov of Russia reported the first such procedure in
1975. One of the earliest US patents for laser cataract removal
(#3,982,541) was issued to Francis L'Esperance in 1976. In later
years, a number of experimenters worked independently on laser devices
for removing cataracts, including Daniel Eichenbaum, whose work became
the basis of the Paradigm PhotonT device; and Jack Dodick, whose
Dodick Laser PhotoLysis System eventually became the first laser unit
to win FDA approval for cataract removal in the United States. Still,
the majority of cataract surgeries continue to be performed using
ultrasound devices, not lasers. Details...
Lawn Mower
John Burr in 1899? No!
English engineer Edwin Budding invented the first reel-type lawn mower
(with blades arranged in a cylindrical pattern) and had it patented in
England in 1830. In 1868 the United States issued patent #73807 to
Amariah M. Hills of Connecticut, who went on to establish the
Archimedean Lawn Mower Co. in 1871. By 1888, the US Patent Office had
granted 138 patents for lawn mowers (Butterworth, Growth of Industrial
Art). Doubtlessly there were even more by the time Burr got his patent
in 1899.
Some website authors want Burr to have invented the first "rotary
blade" mower, with a centrally mounted spinning blade. But his patent
#624749 shows yet another twist on the old reel mower, differing in
only a few details with Budding's original.
Lawn Sprinkler
J. H. Smith in 1897? Elijah McCoy? No!
The first US patent with the title "lawn sprinkler" was issued to J.
Lessler of Buffalo, New York in 1871 (#121949). Early examples of
water-propelled, rotating lawn sprinklers were patented by J. Oswald
in 1890 (#425340) and J. S. Woolsey in 1891 (#457099) among a
gazillion others.
Smith's patent shows just another rotating sprinkler, and McCoy's 1899
patent was for a turtle-shaped sprinkler.
Mailbox (letter drop box)
P. Downing invented the street letter drop box in 1891? No!
George Becket invented the private mailbox in 1892? No!
The US Postal Service says that "Street boxes for mail collection
began to appear in large [US] cities by 1858." They appeared in Europe
even earlier, according to historian Laurin Zilliacus:
Mail boxes as we understand them first appeared on the streets of
Belgian towns in 1848. In Paris they came two years later, while the
English received their 'pillar boxes' in 1855.
Laurin Zilliacus, Mail for the World, p. 178 (New York, J. Day Co.,
1953)
From the same book (p.178), "Private mail boxes were invented in the
United States in about 1860."
Eventually, letter drop boxes came equipped with inner lids to prevent
miscreants from rummaging through the mail pile. The first of many US
patents for such a purpose was granted in 1860 to John North of
Middletown, Connecticut (US Pat. #27466).
Mop
Thomas W. Stewart in 1893? No!
Mops go back a long, long way before 1893. Just how long, is hard to
determine. Restricting our view to the modern era, we find that the
United States issued its first mop patent (#241) in 1837 to Jacob
Howe, called "Construction of Mop-Heads and the Mode of Securing them
upon Handles." One of the first patented mops with a built-in wringer
was the one H. & J. Morton invented in 1859 (US #24049).
The mop specified in Stewart's patent #499402 has a lever-operated
clamp for "holding the mop rags"; the lever is not a wringing
mechanism as erroneously reported on certain websites. Other inventors
had already patented mops with lever-operated clamps, one of the first
being Greenleaf Stackpole in 1869 (US Pat. #89803).
Paper Punch (hand-held)
Charles Brooks in 1893? No!
Was it the first with a hinged receptacle to catch the clippings? No!
The first numbered US patent for a hand-held hole punch was #636,
issued to Solyman Merrick in 1838. Robert James Kellett earned the
first two US patents for a chad-catching hole punch, in 1867 (patent
#65090) and 1868 (#79232).
Pencil Sharpener
John Lee Love in 1897? No!
Bernard Lassimone of Limoges, France invented one of the earliest
sharpeners, receiving French patent number 2444 in 1828. An apparent
ancestor of the 20th-century hand-cranked sharpener was patented by G.
F. Ballou in 1896 (US #556709) and marketed by the A.B. Dick Company
as the "Planetary Pencil Pointer." As the user held the pencil
stationary and turned the crank, twin milling cutters revolved around
the tip of the pencil and shaved it into a point.
Love's patent #594114 shows a variation on a different kind of
sharpener, in which one would crank the pencil itself around in a
stirring motion. An earlier device of a similar type was devised in
1888 by G.H. Courson (patent #388533), and sold under the name
"President Pencil Sharpener."
Here are several other examples of 19th century sharpeners:
Early Mechanical Pencil Sharpeners
Mechanical Pencil Sharpener Gallery ~ 1884-1899
Permanent Wave Machine (for perming hair)
Marjorie Joyner in 1928? No!
That would be German hairdresser Karl Ludwig Nessler (aka Charles
Nestl�) no later than 1906.
Postmarking and Canceling Machine
William Barry in 1897? No!
Try Pearson Hill of England, in 1857. Hill's machine marked the
postage stamp with vertical lines and postmark date. By 1892, US post
offices were using several brands of machines, including one that
could cancel, postmark, count and stack more than 20,000 pieces of
mail per hour (Marshall Cushing, Story of Our Post Office, Boston: A.
M. Thayer & co., 1892, pp.189-191).
Printing Press
W.A. Lavalette invented "the advanced printing press" in 1878? No!
Movable-type printing first appeared in East Asia. In Europe, around
1455,
Johann Gutenberg adapted the screw press used in other trades such as
winemaking and combined it with type-metal alloy characters and
oil-based printing ink. Major advances after Gutenberg include the
cylinder printing press (c. 1811) by Frederick Koenig and Andreas
Bauer, the rotary press (1846) by Richard M. Hoe, and the web press
(1865) by William Bullock. Major advances do not include Lavalette's
patent, which was only one of 3,268 printing patents granted in the US
by the year 1888 (Butterworth, Growth of Industrial Art). Improvements
After Gutenberg
Propeller for Ship
George Tolivar or Benjamin Montgomery? No!
John Stevens constructed a boat with twin steam-powered propellers in
1804 in the first known application of a screw propeller for marine
propulsion. Other important pioneers in the early 1800s included Sir
Francis Pettit Smith of England, and Swedish-born ship designer John
Ericsson (US patent #588) who later designed the USS Monitor.
Refrigerator
Thomas Elkins in 1879? John Stanard in 1891? No!
Oliver Evans proposed a mechanical refrigerator based on a
vapor-compression cycle in 1805 and Jacob Perkins had a working
machine built in 1834. Dr. John Gorrie created an air-cycle
refrigeration system in about 1844, which he installed in a Florida
hospital. In the 1850s Alexander Twining in the USA and James Harrison
in Australia used mechanical refrigeration to produce ice on a
commercial scale. Around the same time, the Carr� brothers of France
led the development of absorption refrigeration systems. A more
detailed timeline Stanard's patent describes not a refrigeration
machine, but an old-fashioned icebox - an insulated cabinet into which
ice is placed to cool the interior. As such, it was a "refrigerator"
only in the old sense of the term, which included non-mechanical
coolers. Elkins created a similarly low-tech cooler, acknowledging in
his patent #221222 that "I am aware that chilling substances inclosed
within a porous box or jar by wetting its outer surface is an old and
well-known process."
Rotary Engine
Andrew Beard in 1892? No!
The Subject Matter Index of Patents Issued from the United States
Patent Office from 1790 to 1873 Inclusive lists 394 "Rotary Engine"
patents from 1810-1873. The Wankel engine, a rotary combustion engine
with a four-stroke cycle, dates from 1954. History of the Rotary
Engine from 1588 Onward
Screw Socket for Light Bulb
Lewis Latimer? No!
The earliest evidence for a light bulb screw base design is a drawing
in a Thomas Edison notebook dated Sept. 11, 1880. It is not the work
of Latimer, though:
Edison's long-time associates, Edward H. Johnson and John Ott, were
principally responsible for designing fixtures in the fall of 1880.
Their work resulted in the screw socket and base very much like those
widely used today.
R. Friedel and P. Israel, Edison's Electric Light: Biography of an
Invention, (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press, 1986).
The 1880 sketch of the screw socket is reproduced in the book cited
above.
Smallpox Vaccine
Onesimus the slave in 1721? No!
Onesimus knew of variolation, an early inoculation technique
practiced in several areas of the world before the discovery of
vaccination. English physician Edward Jenner developed the smallpox
vaccine in 1796 after finding that the relatively innocuous cowpox
virus built immunity against the deadly smallpox. This discovery led
to the eventual eradication of endemic smallpox throughout the world.
Vaccination differs from the primitive inoculation method known as
variolation, which involved the deliberate planting of live smallpox
into a healthy person in hopes of inducing a mild form of the disease
that would provide immunity from further infection. Variolation not
only was risky to the patient but, more importantly, failed to prevent
smallpox from spreading. Known in Asia by 1000 AD, the practice
reached the West via more than one channel.
Smokestack for Locomotives
L. Bell in 1871? No!
Even the first steam locomotives, such as the one built by Richard
Trevithick in 1804, were equipped with smokestacks. Later smokestacks
featured wire netting to prevent hazardous sparks from escaping. Page
115 of John H. White Jr.'s American Locomotives: An Engineering
History, 1830-1880 (1997 edition) displays a composite picture showing
57 different types of spark-arresting smokestacks devised before 1860.
Steam Boiler Furnace
Granville Woods in 1884? No!
The steam engine boiler is of course as old as the steam engine
itself. The Subject Matter Index of Patents Issued from the United
States Patent Office from 1790 to 1873 Inclusive lists several hundred
variations and improvements to the steam boiler, including the
revolutionary water-tube boiler patented in 1867 by American inventors
George Herman Babcock and Stephen Wilcox.
Street Sweeper
Charles Brooks in 1896? No!
Brooks' patent was for a modified version of a common type of street
sweeper cart that had long been known, with a rotary brush that swept
refuse onto an elevator belt and into a trash bin. In the United
States, street sweepers started being patented in the 1840s, and by
1900 the Patent Office had issued about 300 patents for such machines.
Details...
Supercharger for Automobiles
Joseph Gammel/Gamell in 1976? No!
In 1885, Gottlieb Daimler received a German patent for supercharging
an internal combustion engine. Louis Renault patented a centrifugal
supercharger in France in 1902. An early supercharged racecar was
built by Lee Chadwick of Pottstown, Pennsylvania in 1908 and
reportedly reached a speed of 100 miles per hour. History of
Supercharging
Toilet
T. Elkins in 1897? No!
The Minoans of Crete are said to have invented a flush toilet
thousands of years ago; however, there is probably no direct ancestral
relationship between it and the modern one that evolved primarily in
England starting in the late 16th century, when Sir John Harrington
devised a flushing device for his godmother Queen Elizabeth. In 1775
Alexander Cummings patented a toilet in which some water remained
after each flush, thereby suppressing odors from below. The "water
closet" continued to evolve, and in 1885, Thomas Twyford provided us
with a single-piece ceramic toilet similar to the one we know today.
Who Invented the Toilet?
Toilet for Railroad Cars
Lewis Latimer in 1874? No!
William E. Marsh Jr. of New Jersey took out US patent #95597 for
"Improvement in Water-closets for Railroad Cars" five years prior to
Latimer's 1874 patent with the same title. Marsh's patent
specification suggests that railroad-car water closets, i.e., toilets,
were already in use:
In the closets or privies of railroad cars, the cold and wind,
especially while the train is in motion, are very disagreeable... My
invention is to remove these objectionable features....
W. Marsh, US patent #95597, 1869
Tricycle
M.A. Cherry in 1886? No!
In Germany in the year 1680 or thereabouts, paraplegic watchmaker
Stephan Farffler built his own tricycle at 22 years of age. He
designed it to be pedaled with the hands, for obvious reasons. History
of the tricycle
Turn Signals
Richard Spikes in 1913? No! Did the 1913 Pierce Arrow feature Spikes'
turn signals? No!
Electric turn signal lights were devised as early as 1907 (U.S. Patent
912,831), but were not widely offered by major automobile
manufacturers until the late 1930s, when GM developed its own version
and made it standard on Buicks. The Pierce Arrow Museum in Buffalo, NY
denies that directional signals were offered on 1913 Pierce Arrows.
Typewriter
L.S. Burridge & N.R. Marshman in 1885? No!
Henry Mill, an English engineer, was the first person to patent the
basic idea of the typewriter in 1714. The first working typewriter
known to have actually been built was the work of Pellegrino Turri of
Italy in 1808. Americans C. L. Sholes and C. Glidden patented the
familiar QWERTY keyboard in 1868 and brought it to market in 1873. In
1878 change-case keys were added that enabled the typing of both
capital and small letters. Typewriter
History"
posted by LookyHere
>
>> America was
>> created by Whites.
>
>Nope. Nice try, but it simply isn't true.
All those presidents happened to be White by coincidence?
>
>> Canada is also great because the Whites didn't mix
>> with the natives there either.
>
>The French mixed freely with negroes in the south and with Indians
>everywhere. Spaniards also mixed with Indians. Take it as gospel,
>Topie. It's true. It doesn't matter. We all left Africa as one group.
The Spanish mixed with the Natives and that is why Mexico is a basket
case. America and Canada became great.
>
>In Mexico and the other countries to
>> the south, the Whites mixed with the natives, that's why those
>> countries are basket cases.
>
>Is it? Did you ever notice that the closer a country is to the Equator,
>the slower the pace of life?
Put Whites anywhere and you will soon have a great country.
>
>He wrestled with the question. What happened to Jefferson's slaves upon
>his death?
>
>
>Yes, Topie, it is fact. Surviving *white* Jefferson descendents finally
>consented to DNA tests. Blacks claiming to be descendents of Jefferson
>were tested. The Jefferson DNA was present in them.
Probably bull, but I don't have time for this.
>
>It's something a Jew told you.
>
>It wouldn't have been any less true if it had been, but I have both read
>extensively on the topic and have seen documentaries.
The Jews control your media.
>
>Topie is simply speechless.
>
I don't usually waste my time on the braindead, no offence.
Don Gabacho
> X-x: TimeOut
> Path: news.albasani.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!feeder.news-service.com!postnews.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news6
> From: Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics,soc.culture.usa,alt.politics.democrat
> Subject: Re: Re: LaRazans Insane?=Bring Disaster on Our Country
> Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 16:29:24 -0500
> Organization: NewsGuy - Unlimited Usenet $19.95
> Lines: 983
> Message-ID: <00k605hs5ifgjg42k...@4ax.com>
> References: <cfff988f-911e-4844...@b7g2000pre.googlegroups.com> <31ce7f17-3a99-4c65...@u10g2000vbd.googlegroups.com> <o0NLl.29174$YU2....@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com> <dni105l3kivb8gpfp...@4ax.com> <VI5Ml.37470$3k7....@newsfe17.iad> <d124051an1v2kf0gb...@4ax.com> <13uMl.46404$HZ1....@newsfe15.iad>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: p051e5b69c2596e4ed4171b9a6ba9a8ed64bf1477efd651e5.newsdawg.com
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.92/32.572
> X-Original-Bytes: 45874
> Xref: news.albasani.net alt.politics.immigration:261975 alt.politics:1477633 soc.culture.usa:2065817 alt.politics.democrat:49004
> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 090506-0, 05/06/2009), Inbound message
> X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
>
> On Thu, 07 May 2009 05:10:32 +0000, Dave Heil <k8...@frontiernet.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Nope. There were free blacks in business up north.
Who would have been late-comers from the U.S..
Mexico had already slaughtered almost all Blacks Africans who had been
Mexico's original slaves, at least brought from the Old World. They were
deemed insufficiently subserivent compared to enough of Mexico's
inidigenous long conditioned to slavery by the Mexica (Aztecs)---so long
conditioned that one indigenous nation-state subject to the Mexica was a
state-wide slave farm. From birth, the population was actually raised to be
slaves.
The few surving Black Africans left feint traces which are evident today in
the mountains around Acapulco Bay to the mountains surrounding the Bay and
Veracruz and in two very isloated towns inbetween, from within the relative
saftey of those highly inaccessible refuges, they could ply the brigandage
they had been reduced to---raiding convoys of goods being transported
between those two ports via the country's forever grasping and
all-intevening toll house: Mexico City.
When the Mexican Government occasionally parades the only recently
christened, "Afro-Mexicans," they come from less than a handful of villages
so far south to have generally been out of reach of the genocide and, for
the most part, were relative new-comers from Belize. Their numbers could
not comprise more than a fraction of one percent of Mexico's total
populaton.
In regards to "slavery," Mexico has modernized. Mexico City's "paracaistas"
will, and do, enslave anyone; and not just in Mexico. Now also in at least
Mexican communities stateside.
>> There were Chinese
>>building railroads in the west...
...and making shoes at least until Pancho Villa came along and murdered
them. They would have originally arrived from California to be miners.
>> and planting rice in the southeast.
So few, that during the course of some 22 years living in Mexico's S.E.. I
had only encoutered two---brought into the area to cook in a Chinese
restaurant for its Mexican owner.
>>There were Jewish merchants and bankers and factory owners in the north...
And still are. They are called "Ladinos." During the Spanish Inqusition
they hispanized their names. Usually after the names of animals, espcially
birds as in "Garza" of the Garza clan in Monterrey and even Anthony Garza,
the most recent 'Mexico's U.S. Ambassador For Mexico."
>>but also in the south. There were Lebanese storekeepers and bakers.
Still are. They are regarded by Mexicans much like the Jews are regarded
there and elsewhere.
When the son of the most popular president in Mexican history, Cardenas,
ran for the presidency in the 80's and was subsequently defrauded of the
office, he complained incessantly of the "foreigners controllinig the
country." He was not referring to "los Gringos" as Americans would have
thought rather than Mexico's Lebanese and particularly the now often rated
wealthiest man in the world Carlos Slim (as in Sleem).
>>There were steelworkers from Spain.
And cheese makers from Italy. They could only be attracted to immigrate to
Mexico if they were guaranteed (as they remain) nearly totally independent
from Mexican governance including and especially Mexico's so-called police
and military.
Dave Heil
> On Wed, 06 May 2009 01:06:46 +0000, Dave Heil <k8...@frontiernet.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Topaz wrote:
>>>
>>> During World War Two the Germans put Jews and Communists in
>>> concentration camps. The USA locked also up the Japanese and their
>>> political opponents and for less reason. At the end of the war there
>>> was a lot of deaths in the German camps from disease and starvation
>>> because Germany was being bombed to rubble. There is no evidence that
>>> the Germans had gas chambers or an extermination plan.
>> Here, Topie, you asked for it. This can be viewed online or downloaded
>> for free. It is a large file at 2 GB for the MPEG-2.
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/nazi_concentration_camps
>>
>> This one is an American Newsreel from Universal. It is graphic.
>> The file is much smaller than the first.
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/1945-04-26_Nazi_Murder_Mills
>>
>>
>> Every time you post more of your outrageous lies, you can expect to see
>> such a link.
>>
> I don't bother with Jew links. If you have something to say you can
> try putting it directly in your post.
Don't be a melon head, Topie. Posting of large binary files is not to
be done in this non-binary newsgroup. A link to the the file is
sufficient. I personally do not know or care if the site is run by
Jews. That's your problem, not mine.
All I know is that you're going to be seeing links to those films very
often. I encourage folks to watch the film. Then they'll know what you
advocate and support.
Dave Heil
Dave Heil
Dave Heil
The video files found at the links below are quite graphic and shocking.
This shows what the Nazis did to the Jews and others they considered as
"undesirables".
Dave Heil
> On Thu, 07 May 2009 05:10:32 +0000, Dave Heil <k8...@frontiernet.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>> Nope. There were free blacks in business up north. There were Chinese
>> building railroads in the west and planting rice in the southeast.
>> There were Jewish merchants and bankers and factory owners in the north
>> but also in the south. There were Lebanese storekeepers and bakers.
>> There were steelworkers from Spain.
>
> In the sixties America was 90% White.
Nope. Better do your research, Topie. Blacks acounted 12-13% of the
population in the Sixties. You need to account for Asians.
> Anyone who doesn't have his
> head up a Jews aft end can see that America was built by White
> people.
Jews are white people, Topie. :-)
> But even it it wasn't, Whites should still want a country of
> their own now.
You're telling white people what they should want? Who the hell are you?
>>> Maybe they had Black
>>> slaves in the South, but horses did a lot of work too.
>> Did horses pick cotton? Did horses produce a George Washington Carver?
>
>
> "Black Invention Myths
[snip of long, pointless rerun by Topie, in hopes of denying that anyone
not white ever invented anything]
>>> America was
>>> created by Whites.
>> Nope. Nice try, but it simply isn't true.
>
> All those presidents happened to be White by coincidence?
So the race of the elected President determines who created the country?
That's your new claim?
>>> Canada is also great because the Whites didn't mix
>>> with the natives there either.
>> The French mixed freely with negroes in the south and with Indians
>> everywhere. Spaniards also mixed with Indians. Take it as gospel,
>> Topie. It's true. It doesn't matter. We all left Africa as one group.
>
> The Spanish mixed with the Natives and that is why Mexico is a basket
> case. America and Canada became great.
Read this until it sinks in, Topie: The F R E N C H readily mixed with
Indians in C A N A D A and A M E R I C A
Kit Carson and other mountain men also had indian women.
>> In Mexico and the other countries to
>>> the south, the Whites mixed with the natives, that's why those
>>> countries are basket cases.
>> Is it? Did you ever notice that the closer a country is to the Equator,
>> the slower the pace of life?
>
> Put Whites anywhere and you will soon have a great country.
What was left of Yugoslavia under Milosovic wasn't so hot. Albania
wasn't a paradise. I could go on, but you would only deny it.
>> He wrestled with the question. What happened to Jefferson's slaves upon
>> his death?
Still waiting...
>> Yes, Topie, it is fact. Surviving *white* Jefferson descendents finally
>> consented to DNA tests. Blacks claiming to be descendents of Jefferson
>> were tested. The Jefferson DNA was present in them.
>
> Probably bull, but I don't have time for this.
Yes, Topie, you have time. You have all the time it takes to post
filthy lies on Usenet. You surely have time to Google up a web site
which offers proof of my claim. It made the papers. The white
Jefferson descendants confirmed the story.
>
>> It's something a Jew told you.
>>
>> It wouldn't have been any less true if it had been, but I have both read
>> extensively on the topic and have seen documentaries.
>
> The Jews control your media.
No, Topie, they don't. They do control your actions though. Your
hatred for them rules you.
>> Topie is simply speechless.
>>
>
> I don't usually waste my time on the braindead, no offence.
Topie, I submit that you are no rocket scientist. Too bad you don't
live near here. I could show you the wonders of hinges and tape and air
compressors.
Topaz
wrote:
>Don't be a melon head, Topie. Posting of large binary files is not to
>be done in this non-binary newsgroup. A link to the the file is
>sufficient. I personally do not know or care if the site is run by
>Jews. That's your problem, not mine.
>
>All I know is that you're going to be seeing links to those films very
>often. I encourage folks to watch the film. Then they'll know what you
>advocate and support.
>
Dead bodies don't prove that any of them were gassed. In fact not one
of them was gassed. Pictures of dead Germans killed by the allies in
Dresen were also said to be pictures of dead Jews. This article
exposes the falseness of your pictures of dead people at the end of a
war as being any proof of a holo:
by Theodore J. O'Keefe
Nothing has been more effective in establishing the authenticity of
the Holocaust story in the minds of Americans than the terrible scenes
US troops discovered when they entered German concentration camps at
the close of World War II.
At Dachau, Buchenwald, Dora, Mauthausen, and other work and detention
A Different Reality
Typhus, Not Poison Gas
No 'Human Skin' Lampshades
'Gas Chambers'
The Propaganda Intensifies
Time for the Truth
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
Topaz
by Theodore J. O'Keefe
Nothing has been more effective in establishing the authenticity of
the Holocaust story in the minds of Americans than the terrible scenes
US troops discovered when they entered German concentration camps at
the close of World War II.
At Dachau, Buchenwald, Dora, Mauthausen, and other work and detention
Topaz
wrote:
>Nope. Better do your research, Topie. Blacks acounted 12-13% of the
>population in the Sixties. You need to account for Asians.
>
>Jews are white people, Topie. :-)
Jews are an ethnic group. They are not just a religion. If a Jew
becomes a Christian or an atheist he still says he is a Jew. Most of
the Jews in the Jew country are atheist. They say that a Jew is anyone
that has a Jewish mother. Therefore it is a hereditary thing.
We are for having a nation of White people. Jews would be White enough
to join us if it weren't for other important factors. One factor is
that they don't want our race to live. They want to be the only
Caucasians to survive on the earth.
The Jews have their own Jew country, but they demand multi-culture and
pluralism for us. Their leaders agree with something Hitler wrote:
"A State which, in an epoch of racial adulteration, devotes itself to
the duty of preserving the best elements of its racial stock must one
day become ruler of the Earth."
Jews are enemies of White civilization. Here are some quotes
from a very pro-Jewish book that was first published in 1925. The book
is "Stranger than Fiction" by Lewis Browne.
"But save for such exceptions, the Jews who led or participated
in the heroic efforts to remold the world of the last century, were
neither Reform or Orthodox. Indeed, they were often not professing
Jews at all.
"For instance, there was Heinrich Heine and Ludwig Borne, both
unfaltering champions of freedom. And even more conspicuously, there
was Karl Marx, one of the great prophetic geniuses of modern times.
"Jewish historians rarely mention the name of this man, Karl
Marx, though in his life and spirit he was far truer to the mission of
Israel than most of those who were forever talking of it. He was born
in Germany in 1818, and belonged to an old rabbinic family. He was not
himself reared as a Jew, however, but while still a child was baptized
a Christian by his father. Yet the rebel soul of the Jew flamed in him
throughout his days, for he was always a 'troubler' in Europe."
"Then, of course, there are Ludwig Borne and Heinrich Heine, two
men who by their merciless wit and sarcasm became leaders among the
revolutionary writers. Karl Marx, Ferdinand Lassalle, Johann Jacoby,
Gabriel Riesser, Adolphe Cremieux, Signora Nathan- all these of Jewish
lineage played important roles in the struggle that went throughout
Europe in this period. Wherever the war for human liberty was being
waged, whether in France, Germany, Austria, Hungary, or Italy, there
the Jew was to be found. It was little wonder that the enemies of
social progress, the monarchists and the Churchmen, came to speak of
the whole liberal movement as nothing but a Jewish plot."
"The Jews had become the money lenders of Europe for quite
evident reasons. The Church sternly forbade all Christians to engage
in the pursuit...
"So the Jews became the money lenders of Europe. They developed
a great shrewdness and cunning in the one and only field of
opportunity left open to them. And with their shrewdness and cunning
they developed a certain cruelty and greed. That was natural. The
world was cruel to them, so when the chance was theirs, they were
cruel in return..."
>
>> But even it it wasn't, Whites should still want a country of
>> their own now.
>
>You're telling white people what they should want? Who the hell are you?
They should.j
There is no Escape!
By David Duke
European-American Unity and Rights Organization (EURO), National
President
There is no escape from the terror of the future.
You can run away for a while.
But the terror will catch up to you.
It will destroy you and everything you love.
No, I am not talking about a new Hollywood horror movie. I am talking
about America. America is changing from the land of our forefathers to
a place where we are no longer at home in spirit, and where our
families are no longer safe in their own homes.
New Orleans has become increasingly like Haiti since the 1960's Civil
Rights movement integrated the schools. Since then, White civil rights
have steadily disappeared.
First the schools deteriorated into cesspools of violence, drugs,
ignorance, barbarity and venereal disease. Blacks always had access to
public schools, but now, almost all Whites were driven from them. They
went from a majority, to less than four percent today. Whites were
driven from the buses and streetcars. In the buses where Blacks once
rode in the back, now Whites dare not ride at all! To do so is just
too dangerous. Friendly and tidy White neighborhoods discovered the
true joys of forced racial integration: junk cars, prostitutes and
drug dealers on the streets. The only Whites remaining in many
neighborhoods fearfully live now behind bars in homes that have become
reverse jails meant to keep the criminals out.
Black political power transformed New Orleans into a corrupt Black
banana republic. Taxes went up, services went down. The condition of
the streets wrecks the cars. Housing projects are so strewn with trash
they look as though they belong in a Third World Country. Rape, murder
and robbery are daily occurrences in the same city where I could once
walk anywhere as a child. Of course, traditional American values and
culture are gone now also. America founding fathers names such as
George Washington's are removed from schools by the Black school board
because he is, "an immoral example for the children." Kwanzaa, a Black
pagan celebration, has replaced Christmas celebrations in schools.
For the last forty years, Whites have steadily fled the city of New
Orleans. They left thousands of the beautiful and stately homes; many
of the beautiful, oak-lined boulevards; and the intangible history and
charm of what was once America's most romantic city. Now its old charm
can only be found in a few heavily policed areas that the tourists
visit or where the very richest live. Yet, frequently a tourist will
veer from the protected areas and find themselves robbed, raped, or
murdered by denizens that would be more at home in the most primitive
tribes of Africa.
The White refugees first fled mostly to Jefferson Parish, a White
redoubt where they could regain the semblance of a normal life. But,
then, Jefferson began its demographic darkening, so the Whites again
packed up their belongings once more and moved even further away. Some
ended up across Lake Ponchartrain, willing to drive three hours a day
to get to and from work, all so their families would be safe.
Some even pretended that they came to North Shore for the trees. But
they certainly didn't move to the now Black areas in New Orleans where
flourish live oaks, some of the most magnificent and beautiful trees
in the world. Most of the new North Shore residents knew, at least
somewhere deep inside, why they fled and why they came to the area
where I now live. I was candid about my choice of Mandeville. I like
the demographics. I like being among my own kind, living in the kind
of clean and beautiful environment our people create. In the last
election for U.S. Congress, I warned my neighbors on the North Shore.
I told them that conditions of New Orleans would eventually come to
them unless a great political change happened in America. A week ago,
a graphic example of what I had warned them about, occurred.
Just a mile from where I live and work, in a subdivision called
Woodridge, a beautiful 25-year-old mother of four, Samantha Jaume, was
brutally murdered in her home by a Black intruder who had followed her
home from a shopping center. He apparently wanted to steal her new
vehicle. The quick thinking of her seven-year-old son, Jason, almost
saved his mother and probably prevented the murder of his sisters and
himself. He hid himself under a desk and called the police.
Samantha lost all of her civil rights including her right to live. Her
husband's civil rights were also violated, and her four children
suffered loss of their Civil Rights more than any Black person in the
1960's who had to use separate water fountains. This family lost wife
and mother for the rest of their lives. If you want to know the true
cost of integration, it is White lives. If Mandeville were truly the
White area so many seek, Samantha would still be alive. Do we dare to
discuss the other hundreds of victims who have suffered a similar fate
over the years on the North Shore? Or the millions of White victims of
Black crime across America. And, it can only get worse. When the North
Shore population goes the way of New Orleans, Jefferson, and of the
new America of the 21st century, the loss of Samantha will be replayed
so many times that Whites will become refugees once more. But, where
will they go? Massive non-white immigration, differential birthrates,
and intermarriage will make our people a rapidly shrinking minority.
Our racial enemies will not stop their darkening of America until
there is no refuge for our people, only annihilation.
This is no movie. This is real life. There is no escape from the
coming terror. It is time we turn around and fight. We must wrest
control of our political system from those who would obliterate our
people. It is too late for Mrs. Samantha Jaume, but not too late for
her children, and for our children if we begin our road back today. My
life is consecrated to that task. How about yours?
Visit our website at www.whitecivilrights.com
>
>[snip of long, pointless rerun by Topie, in hopes of denying that anyone
>not white ever invented anything]
Name one.
>So the race of the elected President determines who created the country?
>That's your new claim?
America was created by White people. That's why it became great.
"I was listening to a speech that he gave in Sweden. You can listen at
the
Url below if ya want. http://www.davidduke.com/
Anyway, the guy made an analogy that sums it all up.
He said, lets look at Iceland. They have one of the worlds lowest
crime rates, and have some of the worlds highest test scores.
He then went on to say: Haiti is rich in natural resources, they have
great weather, beaches etc.. Yet its a murder, rape capital of the
world. etc, etc.
He went on to say: If we were to take all of the people from Haiti &
Move them to Iceland, Well, they would soon die.
Take those from Iceland and move them to Haiti and within one
generation Haiti would be paradise on earth.
He explained it better than I did. But you should get the gist of the
Iceland / Haiti analogy. Better yet, listen to the Stockholm speech
and hear it for yourself.."
Tommy
>
>Read this until it sinks in, Topie: The F R E N C H readily mixed with
>Indians in C A N A D A and A M E R I C A
Not that much. Canada is mostly White people now.
>
>Kit Carson and other mountain men also had indian women.
America was mostly White.
>>> Is it? Did you ever notice that the closer a country is to the Equator,
>>> the slower the pace of life?
>>
>> Put Whites anywhere and you will soon have a great country.
>
>What was left of Yugoslavia under Milosovic wasn't so hot. Albania
>wasn't a paradise. I could go on, but you would only deny it.
Communism was Jewish, and anything Jewish would corrupt a society.
>
>>> He wrestled with the question. What happened to Jefferson's slaves upon
>>> his death?
>
>Still waiting...
Who cares?
>
>>> Yes, Topie, it is fact. Surviving *white* Jefferson descendents finally
>>> consented to DNA tests. Blacks claiming to be descendents of Jefferson
>>> were tested. The Jefferson DNA was present in them.
>>
>> Probably bull, but I don't have time for this.
>
>Yes, Topie, you have time. You have all the time it takes to post
>filthy lies on Usenet. You surely have time to Google up a web site
>which offers proof of my claim. It made the papers. The white
>Jefferson descendants confirmed the story.
No doubt they were self-hating liberals.
>No, Topie, they don't. They do control your actions though. Your
>hatred for them rules you.
There was a book in ordinary bookstores called "An Empire of
Their Own". It was a pro-Jewish book but it showed that the Jews ran
Hollywood.
Here are some quotes from a magazine for Jews called "Moment".
It is subtitled "The Jewish magazine for the 90's" These quotes are
from the Aug 1996 edition after the Headline "Jews Run Hollywood - So
What?":
"It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish
power and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most
influential production executives at each of the major movie studios
will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names."
"the famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt
Disney, a gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harbored anti-Semetic
attitudes, now features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most
powerful positions."
The head of Walt Disney studios is now the Jew Michael Eisner.
On studios that were bought out by the Japanese the magazine says:
"When Mitsushita took over MCA-Universal, they did nothing to
undermine the unquestioned authority of Universal's legendary - and
all Jewish - management triad of Lew Wasserman, Sid Scheinberg, and
Tom Pollack."
Here are some quotes from the paper "Jews Control the Media
and Rule America"
It may be rather out of date but it still explains why things are the
way they are.
"American Broadcasting Companies (ABC), Columbia Broadcasting
System (CBS), and National Broadcasting Company (NBC). Each of these
three has been under the absolute control of a single man over a long
enough period of time--ranging from 32 to 55 years--for him to staff
the corporation at every level with officers of his choosing and then
to place his imprint indelibly upon it. In each case that man has been
a Jew.
"Until 1985, when ABC merged with Capital Cities
Communications, Inc...the chairman of the board of directors and chief
executive officer (CEO) of the network was Leonard Harry Goldenson, a
Jew...In an interview in the April 1, 1985 issue of Newsweek,
Goldenson boasted 'I built this company (ABC) from scratch.'"
"CBS was under the domination of William S. Paley for more than
half a century. The son of immigrant Jews from Russia..."
"There has been no move by top G-E management to change the
Jewish "profile" of NBC or to replace key Jewish personnel. To the
contrary, new Jewish executives have been added: an example is Steve
Friedman..."
"The man in charge of the television entertainment division at
CBS is Jeff Sagansky. At ABC the entertainment division is run by two
men....nearly all of the men who shape young Amercians' concept of
reality, of good and evil, of permissible and impermissible behavior
are Jews. In particular, Sagansky and Bloomberg are Jews. So is
Tartikoff. Littlefield is the only Gentile who has had a significant
role in TV entertainment programming in recent years."
"American Film magazine listed the top 10...entertainment
companies and their CEOs...Time Warner Communications (Steven J Ross,
Jew) Walt Disney Co. (Michael D. Eisner, Jew)...Of the 10 top
entertainment CEOs listed above, eight are Jews."
"The Newhouse media empire provides an example of more than a
lack of real competition among America's daily newspapers; it also
illustrates the insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all organs of
opinion... The Newhouse's own 31 daily newspapers, including several
large and important ones, such as the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the
Newark Star-Ledger, and the New Orleans Times-Picayune; the nation's
largest trade book publishing conglomerate, Random House, with all
its subsidiaries; Newhouse Broadcasting, consisting of 12 television
broadcasting stations and 87 cable-TV systems, including some of the
countries largest cable networks- the Sunday supplement Parade, with a
circulation of more than 22 million copies per week; some two dozen
major magazines, including the New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle,
Glamour, Vanity Fair, HQ, Bride's, Gentlemen's Quarterly, Self,
Home&Garden...."
"Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership
and management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising..."
"the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington
Post. These three...are the newspapers which set trends and guidelines
for nearly all others. They are the ones which decide what is news and
what isn't, at national and international levels. They originate the
news; the others merely copy it. And all three newspapers are in
Jewish hands...The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York
Times Co. 36 other newspapers; twelve magazines, including McCall's
and Family Circle..."
"New York's other newspapers are in no better hands than the
Daily News. The New York Post is owned by billionaire Jewish
real-estate developer Peter Kalikow. The Village Voice is the personal
property of Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of..."
"There are only three newsmagazines of any note published in the
United States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report....The CEO
of Time Warner Communications is Steven J. Ross, and he is a Jew.
"Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington
Post Co., under the Jewess Katherine Meyer Graham..."
"U.S. News & World Report... owned and published by Jewish real
estate developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman..."
" The three largest book publishers...Random House... Simon &
Schuster , and Time Inc. Book Co....All three are owned or controlled
by Jews...The CEO of Simon & Schuster if Richard Snyder, and the
president is Jeremy Kaplan; both are Jews too."
"Western Publishing...ranks first among publishers of children's
books, with more than 50 per cent of the market. Its chairman and CEO
is Richard Bernstein, a Jew."
"Jewish spokesmen customarily will use evasive tactics. "Ted
Turner isn't a Jew!" they will announce..."
"We are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence
on our political system and virtual control of our government; we also
are giving them control of the minds and souls of our children..."
David Eduardo
"Topaz" <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:l099051jlolp6an5g...@4ax.com...
> crime rates, and have some of the worlds highest test scores.
They are also the first country to go bankrupt, so inept was the fiscal
policy of the nation.
>
> He then went on to say: Haiti is rich in natural resources, they have
> great weather, beaches etc.. Yet its a murder, rape capital of the
> world. etc, etc.
Haiti has basically no natural resources. The land itself, once a resource
for farming, began to experince soil erosion during the plantation years of
French rule, and now very little of the land is arable except for
subsistence level farming.
>
> He went on to say: If we were to take all of the people from Haiti &
> Move them to Iceland, Well, they would soon die.
And they would die due to changes in diet, climate, etc., just as the Ta�nos
died in Puerto Rico when subjected to European foods and meals when they
were enslaved by the Spanish. Further, putting all Haitians in a very small
place like Iceland would result in an unsustainable environment.
>
> Take those from Iceland and move them to Haiti and within one
> generation Haiti would be paradise on earth.
There is nothing left to make a paradise out of. No topsoil, nearly no
forrests, no natural resources to sell abroad.
Also, there are 325,000 people in Iceland. There are 10,000,000 in Haiti.
Why do racists never check their facts?
johnny@.
That is because American companies exploit these people by paying them
only enough to survive. Levi Strauss is one of these companies. Have
you seen their prices dropping.
You can thank George Bush for this. People suffering means nothing to
him, and nothing to people that only care about how much money they can
make.
>
> Also, there are 325,000 people in Iceland. There are 10,000,000 in Haiti.
>
> Why do racists never check their facts?
The racists are the people exploiting the Haitians. Actually they are
worse than racists, they don't care anything about the human race, or
the planet, they only care about more money.
Don Gabacho
> And they would die due to changes in diet, climate, etc., just as the Ta�nos
> died in Puerto Rico when subjected to European foods and meals...
ROFL! That's good one.
Spanish chefs killed them with tapas and paella!
David Eduardo
<johnny@.> wrote in message
news:HX3Nl.39181$qa.2...@bignews4.bellsouth.net...
>>
>> There is nothing left to make a paradise out of. No topsoil, nearly no
>> forrests, no natural resources to sell abroad.
>
> That is because American companies exploit these people by paying them
> only enough to survive. Levi Strauss is one of these companies. Have you
> seen their prices dropping.
How can a small jean factory in the biggest city have anything to do with
centuries of erosion caused by deforestation.
Levi Strauss pays legal local wages.
>
> The racists are the people exploiting the Haitians. Actually they are
> worse than racists, they don't care anything about the human race, or the
> planet, they only care about more money.
So bringing jobs to Haiti, at higher than legal minimum wage, is bad?
It's pretty obvious you have never been in Haiti.
Topaz
>They are also the first country to go bankrupt, so inept was the fiscal
>policy of the nation.
All Jewish controlled countries have a horrible economic system:
The money system we have today is called the debt-money
system. It is corrupt and needs to be replaced. The only way money
comes into existence today is when it is borrowed. There is no freely
existing money supply, but only borrowed money that needs to be paid
back to bankers with interest. If all the money that was owed to
bankers was ever paid back there would be no money left in circulation
and this would be a great depression. What makes matters even worse is
that when money is created only the principle of the loan is created.
The money needed to pay the interest is never created. For this reason
it is impossible to pay back the principle plus the interest on all of
the loans that make up our money supply. The extra amount of money
needed to pay the interest was never created and does not exist.
The United States government borrows money from the Federal
Reserve Bank. This bank is not federal but owned by private
stockholders. It is in the business section of the phone book, not the
government section. Other banks also create the money in our money
supply. They are allowed to loan out much more money then they
actually have. Thus they create new money. No one else is allowed to
create money, only bankers have this privilege. All of our money is
debt-money and it is all owed back to bankers, plus the interest.
In the U.S.A. money is created by the Bureau of Engraving and
Printing which is a unit of the treasury, but the orders to print come
from the Federal Reserve Banks. The money is created for and owned by
the banks. And the Federal Reserve Banks are not Federal, in spite of
the name. Privately owned commercial banks own the stock of the
Federal Reserve Banks. The Federal Reserve Banks give the newly
created money to the government in exchange for government bonds. To
simplify: The United States does not make its own money. Bankers
create the money and loan it to the United States with an interest
charge.
The book War Cycles Peace Cycles puts it this way:
"If there is only $10 in existence, and you lend it to someone
under the condition that he repay $11, and if he agrees to this, he
has agreed to the impossible."
The book The Struggle for World Power put it this way:
"The Bank of England... was the first payment institution which
was legally empowered to issue state-authorized paper currency and ,
therefore, the Government itself became its debtor. Thus the State not
only renounced its monopoly on monetary emission, but also agreed to
borrow the privately-created money from the bankers...Not only the
thing being done, but even the very name was a deliberate fraud and
deception to conceal the essence of the deed. To create money out of
nothing is to make valid and effective claim on all goods and services
for no return, which is fraud and theft, made worse by the
circumstances that the money is lent out at interest...it follows that
those who have the power to 'create' out of nothing all the money in
each country and the whole world and lend it as stated, have total
power over all states, parties, firms, radio, press, individuals and
so on. Therefore the power of Parliament in general, and especially
with regard to money, is non-existent, and all the true sovereignty is
in the hands of those private individuals who issue all money"
>
>Haiti has basically no natural resources. The land itself, once a resource
>for farming, began to experince soil erosion during the plantation years of
>French rule, and now very little of the land is arable except for
>subsistence level farming.
Funny how the "soil erosion" only occured right after the Blacks
murdered all the Whites and took over the island.
>And they would die due to changes in diet, climate, etc., just as the Ta�nos
>died in Puerto Rico when subjected to European foods and meals when they
>were enslaved by the Spanish. Further, putting all Haitians in a very small
>place like Iceland would result in an unsustainable environment.
>>
>> Take those from Iceland and move them to Haiti and within one
>> generation Haiti would be paradise on earth.
>
>There is nothing left to make a paradise out of. No topsoil, nearly no
>forrests, no natural resources to sell abroad.
Nope, if it was Whites living there it would soon be a paradise.
>
>Also, there are 325,000 people in Iceland. There are 10,000,000 in Haiti.
>
>Why do racists never check their facts?
The fact is that all White countries are advanced and all Black
countries are primitive. There could be problems like a potato famine
or Communism in White countries, but these countries were once
civilized. Black countries have never been civilized.
Dave Heil
> On Fri, 08 May 2009 05:21:18 +0000, Dave Heil <k8...@frontiernet.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>> Nope. Better do your research, Topie. Blacks acounted 12-13% of the
>> population in the Sixties. You need to account for Asians.
>>
>
>> Jews are white people, Topie. :-)
>
>
> Jews are an ethnic group. They are not just a religion.
They're TWO *clap*, TWO *clap*, TWO groups in ONE!
> We are for having a nation of White people.
We? Do you have multiple personalities?
Dave Heil
repo
> >died in Puerto Rico when subjected to European foods and meals when they
> >were enslaved by the Spanish. Further, putting all Haitians in a very small
> >place like Iceland would result in an unsustainable environment.
>
> >> Take those from Iceland and move them to Haiti and within one
> >> generation Haiti would be paradise on earth.
>
> >There is nothing left to make a paradise out of. No topsoil, nearly no
> >forrests, no natural resources to sell abroad.
>
> Nope, if it was Whites living there it would soon be a paradise.
>
>
>
> >Also, there are 325,000 people in Iceland. There are 10,000,000 in Haiti.
>
> >Why do racists never check their facts?
>
> The fact is that all White countries are advanced and all Black
> countries are primitive. There could be problems like a potato famine
> or Communism in White countries, but these countries were once
> civilized. Black countries have never been civilized.
You've been reading too many Hitler and Nazi propoganda which
are lies; then you repeat the lies which you know are lies.
Strabo
> Topaz wrote:
>> On Mon, 4 May 2009 18:55:31 -0700, "David Eduardo"
>> <da...@davideduardo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "lorad" <lora...@cs.com> wrote in message
>>> news:31ce7f17-3a99-4c65...@u10g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...
>>>
>>>> Why should ANY american allow a foreign nation to invade the US and
>>>> replace american culture with a mexican one?
>>>>
>>>> Who are these traitors?
>>>>
>>> What is "American Culture?"
>>>
>>> Hint: it is the mix of the cultures of all the different peoples who
>>> have immigrated here over several centuries.
>> America was founded and built by White people.
>
> That's wrong. America was built by whites, blacks, Asians, Hispanics,
> American Indians, Jews and other.
>
>>
>> and undeniable. He desired that all Blacks be returned to Africa or,
>> in the interest of practicality, shipped to the island of Santo
>> Domingo in the Caribbean. Any interpretation of Jefferson's words
>> which is in direct contradiction to his forcefully and repeatedly
>> expressed beliefs on race is obviously an incorrect interpretation.
>
> You can insist that anyone who questions your view of Jefferson is wrong
> but the fact remains that Jefferson wrestled with the question of
> slaves. That is fact. Here's another: We have had forty-one
> We're well beyond you and your ilk, Topaz.
>
Jefferson didn't "wrestle" with the issue of right or wrong, few
believed slavery to be right. He, and many others "wrestled" with
finding a remedy.
What you see as progression is actually regression. Black culture is a
shambles and most are wards of the state, just where they began in 1867
and the 14th A.
And, thanks to the Marxist fervor forcing unworkable demands, after the
coming collapse we'll lose any gains.
But, that's all part of the cycle. Enjoy your ride!
Dave Heil
> by Theodore J. O'Keefe
>
> Nothing has been more effective in establishing the authenticity of
> the Holocaust story in the minds of Americans than the terrible scenes
> US troops discovered when they entered German concentration camps at
> the close of World War II.
> 1.The harrowing scenes of dead and dying inmates were not the result
> of a German policy of "extermination," but rather the result of
> epidemics of typhus and other disease brought about largely by the
> effects of Allied aerial attacks.
Where were the bomb craters, Topie?
What about the German films of guards shooting inmates at the edge of a pit?
Do you consider starvation to be a disease?
> 4.The alleged homicidal showers and gas chambers were used either for
> bathing camp inmates or delousing their clothes; the claim that they
> were used to murder Jews or other human beings is a contemptible
> fabrication.
We have the testimony of survivors, the testimony of guards, the
testimony of camp commandants, the testimony of Allied soldiers who
freed the camps, captured records, captured film, captured photos.
You lie in the face of a mountain of evidence.
> Orthodox historians and professional "Nazi-hunters" have
> quietly dropped claims that inmates were gassed at Dachau, Buchenwald
> and other camps in Germany. They continue, however, to keep silent
> regarding the lies about Dachau and Buchenwald, as well as to evade an
> open discussion of the evidence for homicidal gassing at Auschwitz and
> the other camps captured by the Soviets.
You lie and then you lie some more. You support and defend horrible ogres.
Dave Heil
Dave Heil
> On Fri, 08 May 2009 04:56:04 +0000, Dave Heil <k8...@frontiernet.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>> Don't be a melon head, Topie. Posting of large binary files is not to
>> be done in this non-binary newsgroup. A link to the the file is
>> sufficient. I personally do not know or care if the site is run by
>> Jews. That's your problem, not mine.
>>
>> All I know is that you're going to be seeing links to those films very
>> often. I encourage folks to watch the film. Then they'll know what you
>> advocate and support.
>>
> Dead bodies don't prove that any of them were gassed.
No, they don't. The cylinders of Zyklon B, the fittings which match the
cylinders and fed the shower rooms, those prove gassing.
> In fact not one of them was gassed.
You wouldn't recognize a fact if it were stapled to your forehead.
> Pictures of dead Germans killed by the allies in
> Dresen were also said to be pictures of dead Jews.
Maybe by you, not by any credible source.
> This article
> exposes the falseness of your pictures of dead people at the end of a
> war as being any proof of a holo:
> by Theodore J. O'Keefe
That tawdry article is proof of nothing.
David Eduardo
>>
>>Haiti has basically no natural resources. The land itself, once a resource
>>for farming, began to experince soil erosion during the plantation years
>>of
>>French rule, and now very little of the land is arable except for
>>subsistence level farming.
>
> Funny how the "soil erosion" only occured right after the Blacks
> murdered all the Whites and took over the island.
Nah, it started when the French created big plantations and cleared the land
by burning.
>
>>
>>There is nothing left to make a paradise out of. No topsoil, nearly no
>>forrests, no natural resources to sell abroad.
>
> Nope, if it was Whites living there it would soon be a paradise.
Not true, as places like St. Martin, Boanire, Aruba, Curacao, etc., etc.
prove. The Caribbean islands are simply not able to support large
populations due to climate, etc.
>
>>
>>Also, there are 325,000 people in Iceland. There are 10,000,000 in Haiti.
>>
>>Why do racists never check their facts?
>
> The fact is that all White countries are advanced and all Black
> countries are primitive. There could be problems like a potato famine
> or Communism in White countries, but these countries were once
> civilized. Black countries have never been civilized.
Look at places like Brazil... very civilized, despite much of it being in
the very difficult to develop tropical zone. The fact is that skin color is
related to climate, and the whites are simply descendents of Blacks who
lived outside the tropical zones; the climate made them pale and, generally,
ugly.
Don Gabacho
> "Topaz" <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:au8b05d3a4k4b3fje...@4ax.com...
>
>>>
>>>Haiti has basically no natural resources. The land itself, once a resource
>>>for farming, began to experince soil erosion during the plantation years
>>>of
>>>French rule, and now very little of the land is arable except for
>>>subsistence level farming.
>>
>> Funny how the "soil erosion" only occured right after the Blacks
>> murdered all the Whites and took over the island.
>
> Nah, it started when the French created big plantations and cleared the land
> by burning.
Nah. The French stripped the mountain sides of trees for lumber.
It were the Haitians who slashed and burned, as they still do, fields after
the French plantations were broken up.
>>>
>>>There is nothing left to make a paradise out of. No topsoil, nearly no
>>>forrests, no natural resources to sell abroad.
>>
>> Nope, if it was Whites living there it would soon be a paradise.
>
> Not true, as places like St. Martin, Boanire, Aruba, Curacao, etc., etc.
> prove. The Caribbean islands are simply not able to support large
> populations due to climate, etc.
Hispanola, and Haiti's part of it is no small island.
You're mixing mangos and papayas again.
>>>
>>>Also, there are 325,000 people in Iceland. There are 10,000,000 in Haiti.
Certainly self-control and planning ahead must be a factor.
>>>Why do racists never check their facts?
>>
>> The fact is that all White countries are advanced and all Black
>> countries are primitive. There could be problems like a potato famine
>> or Communism in White countries, but these countries were once
>> civilized. Black countries have never been civilized.
>
> Look at places like Brazil... very civilized, despite much of it being in
> the very difficult to develop tropical zone. The fact is that skin color is
> related to climate, and the whites are simply descendents of Blacks who
> lived outside the tropical zones; the climate made them pale and, generally,
> ugly.
In other words, had the good sense to move out of the tropics?
Topaz
wrote:
>
>No, they don't. The cylinders of Zyklon B,
Zyklon B is an insecticide. Many lives were saved because the killed
the lice which spread disease.
>the fittings which match the
>cylinders and fed the shower rooms, those prove gassing.
"The Zyklon B was supposed to have been
dropped down through holes in the roof. But we have photographs of
the roof of Krema II, and there are no holes in the roof. Some
holocaust tale-tellers claim the Zyklon-B was dropped into hollow
pillars. But the ruins of Krema II are still there, and there are no
hollow pillars to be seen. Some say the Zyklon B was lowered in a wire
mesh basket. No wire mesh basket was ever found.
In fact, no physical evidence has ever been found to support even
one of the silly holocaust gassing stories. No holes, no hollow
pillars, no wire mesh baskets, no Zyklon B residue in the walls, and
no special ventillation fans. What's more, there is not a sign of
physical remains of hundreds of thousands of bodies of victims who
were supposed to be gassed.
All we have is talk, talk, talk--tales, tales, tales--moaning,
lamentations, whining, and finger-pointing. We have movies, TV
programs, magazine articles, essays, opinions, lectures, and
legends--but no physical evidence.
Leuchter went to auschwitz looking for some physical evidence of
gas chambers. He found nothing, the same thing everyone else found
over the last fifty years. Leuchter was right on every point: no gas
chambers at Auschwitz."
Morghus
>
>
>> In fact not one of them was gassed.
>
>You wouldn't recognize a fact if it were stapled to your forehead.
The Jews control your media and your mind.
>
>> Pictures of dead Germans killed by the allies in
>> Dresen were also said to be pictures of dead Jews.
>
>Maybe by you, not by any credible source.
It was proven beyond doubt in the Spotlight.
>
>That tawdry article is proof of nothing.
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
Topaz
wrote:
>
>> 1.The harrowing scenes of dead and dying inmates were not the result
>> of a German policy of "extermination," but rather the result of
>> epidemics of typhus and other disease brought about largely by the
>> effects of Allied aerial attacks.
>
>Where were the bomb craters, Topie?
>
>What about the German films of guards shooting inmates at the edge of a pit?
Actually it was Communists doing the shooting. And the Germans were
fighting against Communism.
"The Katyn Forest is an area in Poland were the Soviets had
massacred thousands of Polish cadre. When the Germans wrested control
from the Soviets they were informed of thousands being driven out to
the forest never to be seen again. The Germans located the mass graves
and did a forensic archeological investigation.
At the Nuremberg trials where the Soviets sat as prosecutors and
judges themselves they introduced the massacre as a German crime and
the Allied members allowed it even though they knew who really did it,
which tells us something ugly about the nature of the trials. Super
exemplifying the basic mode of Holocaust evidence, the Soviets
submitted a report hundreds of pages long totally founded on
"eyewitness" accounts. The reality eventually surfaced in the form of
an extant German report, complete with photographs of the excavation
as it was happening along with foreign forensic experts and
journalists invited and Allied POW officers brought in to witness the
scene, all photographed at the scene.
With the advent of Glasnost the Soviets eventually came to admit to
the crime.
The German report stands ironically and poetically as the only
real documented forensic investigation ever performed on any mass
grave stemming from the WW II era.
Nuremberg Tribunal
The incident of the Katyn Forest being introduced to the
Nuremberg Tribunal stands as monolithic evidence that the trials were
a farce. In addition to that one grand indictment the determinations
of the Tribunal also included finding the defendants guilty of mass
extermination at camps in Germany, since erased from the story, and
the 4,000,000 number for Auschwitz currently 1,000,000. Inquiring
minds have gone over the records of the trials and the case for a
kangaroo court is outstanding."
>
>Do you consider starvation to be a disease?
no
>
>We have the testimony of survivors, the testimony of guards, the
>testimony of camp commandants, the testimony of Allied soldiers who
>freed the camps, captured records, captured film, captured photos.
>You lie in the face of a mountain of evidence.
All Jewish BS. Here is an example:
People who write confessions are often told exactly what to write,
word for word, by their interrogators.
Some Germans did "confess":
"In the introduction to Death Dealer [Buffalo: Prometheus, 1992], the
historian Steven Paskuly wrote: "Just after his capture in 1946, the
British Security Police were able to extract a statement from Hoess by
beating him and filling him with liquor." Paskuly was reiterating what
Rupert Butler and Bernard Clarke had already described.
In 1983, Rupert Butler published an unabashed memoir (Legions of
Death, Hamlyn: London) describing in graphic detail how, over three
days, he and Clarke and other British policemen managed to torture
Hoess into making a "coherent statement." According to Butler [Legions
of Death, p. 237], he and the other interrogators put the boots to
Hoess the moment he was captured. For starters, Clarke struck his face
four times to get H�ess to reveal his true identity.
<quote>
The admission suddenly unleashed the loathing of Jewish sergeants in
the arresting party whose parents had died in Auschwitz following an
order signed by H�ss.
The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pyjamas ripped from his
body. He was then dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where
it seemed to Clarke the blows and screams were endless.
Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: "Call them off,
unless you want to take back a corpse."
A blanket was thrown over H�ss and he was dragged to Clarke's car,
where the sergeant poured a substantial slug of whisky down his
throat. H�ss tried to sleep.
Clarke thrust his service stick under the man's eyelids and ordered in
Geffnan: "Keep your pig eyes open, you swine."
For the first time H�ss trotted out his oft-repeated justification: "I
took my orders frorn Himmler. I was a soldier in the same way as you
are a soldier and we had to obey orders."
The party arrived back at Heide around three in the morning. The snow
was swirling still, but the blanket was torn from H�ss and he was made
to walk completely nude through the prison yard to his cell.
</quote>
An article in the Britsh newspaper Wrexham Leader [Mike Mason, "In a
cell with a Nazi war criminal-We kept him awake until he confessed,"
October 17, 1986] following the airing of a TV documentary on the case
of Rudolf Hoess included eyewitness recollections by Ken Jones:
<quote>
Mr. Ken Jones was then a private with the Fifth Royal Horse Artillery
stationed at Heid[e] in Schleswig-Holstein. "They brought him to us
when he refused to cooperate over questioning about his activities
during the war. He came in the winter of 1945/6 and was put in a
small jail cell in the barracks," recalls Mr. Jones. Two other
soldiers were detailed with Mr. Jones to join H�ss in his cell to help
break him down for interrogation. "We sat in the cell with him, night
and day, armed with axe handles. Our job was to prod him every time
he fell asleep to help break down his resistance," said Mr. Jones.
When H�ss was taken out for exercise he was made to wear only jeans
and a cotton shirt in the bitter cold. After three days and nights
without sleep, H�ss finally broke down and made a full confession to
the authorities.
</quote>
The confession Hoess signed was numbered document NO-1210; later
revamped, as document PS-3868, which became the basis for an oral
deposition Hoess made for the IMT on April 15, 1946, a month after it
had been extracted from him by torture.
In his memoirs Hoess recounts the circumstances of his arrest and what
followed. The treatment that he underwent was particularly brutal.
At first blush it's surprising the Poles allowed Hoess to make the
revelations he did concerning the British military police. Perhaps
they did so to lend the Hoess confession a veneer of veracity; or to
move the reader to make a comparison, flattering for the Polish
Communists, betweenthe British and Polish methods.
In fact, Hoess later said that during the first part of his detention
at Cracow, his jailers came very close to breaking him physically and
psychologically, but that later they treated him with "such decent and
considerate treatment" that he consented to write his memoirs; to
provide an explanation for certain absurdities contained in the text
(NO-1210) that the British police had made Hoess sign, one of these
absurdities being the invention of an extermination camp in a place
which never existed on any Polish map: "Wolzek near Lublin." Hoess had
talked of 3 camps-Belzek [sic], Tublinka [sic] and Wolzek near Lublin,
although the Belzec and Treblinka camps did not yet exist when (June
1941) Himmler, according to Hoess, told him they were already
functioning as "extermination camps."
Here is how, one after the other, Rudolf Hoess described his arrest by
the British, his signing of the document classified as NO-1210, his
transfer to Minden-on-the-Weser, where the treatment that he underwent
was worse yet, his stay at the IMT prison, and, finally, his
extradition to Poland [Commandant in Auschwitz, Introduction by Lord
Russell of Liverpool, English translation Weidenfeld and Nicolson,
1959, P. 173-175]:
<quote>
I was arrested on 11 March 1946 [at 11 pm].
My phial of poison had been broken two days before.
When I was aroused from sleep, I thought at first I was being attacked
by robbers, for many robberies were taking place at that time. That
was how they managed to arrest me. I was maltreated by Field Security
Police. I was taken to Heide where I was put m those very barracks
from which I had been released by the British eight months earlier.
At my first interrogation evidence was obtained by beating me. I do
not know what is in the record, although I signed it. Alcohol and the
whip were too much for me. The whip was my own, which by chance had
got into my wife's luggage. It had hardly ever touched my horse, far
less the prisoners. Nevertheless, one of my Investigators was
convinced I had perpetually used it for flogging the prisoners.
After some days I was taken to Minden-on-the-Weser, the main
interrogation centre in the British Zone. There I received further
rough treatment at hands of the English public prosecutor, a major.
The conditions in the prison accorded with this behaviour.
After three weeks, to my surprise, I was shaved and had my hair cut
and I was allowed to wash. My handcuffs had not previously been
removed since my arrest.
On the next day I was taken by lorry to Nuremberg, together with a
prisoner of war who had been brought over from London as a witness in
Fritzsche's defence. My imprisonment by the International Military
Tribunal was a rest-cure compared to what I had been through before.
I was accommodated in the same building as the principal accused, and
was able to see them daily as they were taken to the court. Almost
every day we were visited by representatives for all the Allied
nations. I was always pointed out as an especially interesting animal.
I was in Nuremberg because Kaltenbrunner's counsel had demanded me as
a witness for his defence. I have never been able to grasp, and it is
still not clear to me, how I of all people could have helped to
exonerate Kaltenbrunner. Although the conditions in prison were, in
every respect, good-I read whenever I had the time, and there was a
well stocked library available-the interrogations were extremely
unpleasant not so much physically, but far more because of their
strong psychological effect. I cannot really blame the
interrogators-they were all Jews.
Psychologically I was almost cut in pieces. They wanted to know all
about everything, and this was also done by Jews. They left me in no
doubt whatever as to the fate that was in store for me.
On 25 May, my wedding armiversary as it happened, I was driven with
van Burgsdorff and B�hler to the aerodrome and there handed over to
Polish officers. We flew in an American plane via Berlin to Warsaw.
Although we were treated very politely during our journey, I feared
the worst when I remembered my experiences in the British Zone and the
tales I had heard about the way people were being treated in the East.
</quote>
If, as is obvious, Hoess was tortured into confessing absurdities,
then it is not too far-fetched to suppose the same brutal treatment
would have been given to other Allied prisoners. (As, indeed, it was.)
For example, during his oral deposition on April 15, 1946, before the
IMT, Hoess agreed (responding to Col. Amen's question) that he had
overseen the killings Hungarian Jews in early 1943 -- even though the
first convoy of them did not arrive in Auschwitz until May 1944.
A month earlier Hoess had signed a statement claiming to have arranged
for the "gassings of two million persons between June/July 1941 and
the end of 1943."
Yet, Col. Amen did not ask Hoess to elaborate on the text of his
"confession" which he held in his hands. Hence, what references are
contained in transcripts of the Nuremberg trial to the gas chambers
are vague and few in number.
The IMT records certainly do not include any expert report on the
weapon of a crime without precedent and autopsy reports clinically
confirming deaths by a gassing with the agent Zyklon B at Auschwitz,
for instance."
Orest Slepokura
>
>You lie and then you lie some more. You support and defend horrible ogres.
>
Here is proof that your side are the liars:
Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The
Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler was
in favor of big lies. This was in itself a big lie and proof that
Hitler was right. Here is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in
context:
"But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity
for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute
responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had
shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the
catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that
hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for
the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took
away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous
enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the
Fatherland to justice. All this was inspired by the principle--which
is quite true in itself--that in the big lie there is always a certain
force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always
more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature
than consciously or voluntarily, and thus in the primitive simplicity
of their minds they are more readily fall victims to the big lie than
the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little
matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It
would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and
they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort
truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so
may be brought clearly to their minds, they still doubt and waver and
will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For
the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it
has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in
this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These
people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest
purposes.
"From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than
any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their
very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a
religious community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a
race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has
branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and
exactly true. He (Schopenhauer) called the Jew 'The Great Master of
Lies'. Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not
wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth
to prevail."
Topaz
wrote:
>
>You've been reading too many Hitler and Nazi propoganda which
>are lies; then you repeat the lies which you know are lies.
It's easy to prove that the media is a pack of liars. If they
were not liars they would tell people that Hitler believed that the
Jews controlled the media. Why don't they? Here are some quotes from
Mein Kampf:
"The man who is not opposed and vilified and slandered in the Jewish
Press is not a staunch German and not a true National Socialist. The
best rule whereby the sincerity of his convictions, his character and
strength of will, can be measured is by the hostility which his name
arouses among the mortal enemies of our people.
"The followers of the movement, and indeed the whole nation, must be
reminded again and again of the fact that, through the medium of his
newspapers, the Jew is always spreading falsehood and that if he tells
the truth on some occasions it is only for the purpose of masking some
greater deceit, which turns the apparent truth into a deliberate
falsehood. The Jew is the Great Master of Lies. Falsehood and
duplicity are the weapons with which he fights.
"Every calumny and falsehood published by the Jews are tokens of honor
which can be worn by our comrades. He whom they decry most is nearest
to our hearts and he whom they mortally hate is our best friend.
"If a comrade of ours opens a Jewish newspaper in the morning and does
not find himself vilified there, then he has spent yesterday to no
account. For if he had achieved something he would be persecuted,
slandered, derided and abused. Those who effectively combat this
mortal enemy of our people, who is at the same time the enemy of all
Aryan peoples and all culture, can only expect to arouse opposition on
the part of this race and become the object of its slanderous attacks.
"When these truths become part of the flesh and blood, as it were, of
our members, then the movement will be impregnable and invincible."
" Then I began to examine my favorite 'World Press', with that fact
before my mind. "The deeper my soundings went the lesser grew my
respect for that Press which I formerly admired. Its style became
still more repellant and I was forced to reject its ideas as entirely
shallow and superficial. To claim that in the presentation of facts
and views its attitude was impartial seemed to me to contain more
falsehood than truth. The writers were- Jews.
"Thousands of details that I had scarcely noticed before seemed to me
now to deserve attention. I began to grasp and understand things which
I had formerly looked at in a different light."
"Thus another weapon beside that of freemasonry would have to be
secured. This was the Press. The Jew exercised all his skill and
tenacity in getting hold of it. By means of the Press he began
gradually to control public life in its entirety."
Topaz
<da...@davideduardo.com> wrote:
>> Funny how the "soil erosion" only occured right after the Blacks
>> murdered all the Whites and took over the island.
>
>Nah, it started when the French created big plantations and cleared the land
>by burning.
There were no farming or economic problems before the Blacks tortured
and murdered all the Whites. It was prosperous.
>
>Not true, as places like St. Martin, Boanire, Aruba, Curacao, etc., etc.
>prove. The Caribbean islands are simply not able to support large
>populations due to climate, etc.
Whites would build a paradise in any climate.
>
>Look at places like Brazil... very civilized,
Very poor.
> despite much of it being in
>the very difficult to develop tropical zone. The fact is that skin color is
>related to climate, and the whites are simply descendents of Blacks who
>lived outside the tropical zones; the climate made them pale and, generally,
>ugly.
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
sigvaldi
> They are also the first country to go bankrupt, so inept was the fiscal
> policy of the nation.
Iceland did not go bankrupt, despite coming quite close.
> Further, putting all Haitians in a very small
> place likeIcelandwould result in an unsustainable environment.
The total land area of Iceland is almost 5 times greater than Haiti.
Topaz
wrote:
The Blacks in Africa were primitive naked head hunter cannibals. All
IQ tests prove that Whites are on average much more intelligent than
Blacks. And it's not just Iceland and Haiti, it's all White countries
and all Black countries. Some may bring up Russia which is poor due
to Communism, Communism is that horrible. But Russia never had naked
head hunter cannibals.
Michael Ejercito
> On Sat, 9 May 2009 21:18:23 -0700, "David Eduardo"
>
> >prove. The Caribbean islands are simply not able to support large
> >populations due to climate, etc.
>
> Whites would build a paradise in any climate.
they built with the phrase "Arbeit Macht Frei" signed over the main
gate.
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> On Mon, 11 May 2009 06:07:43 -0700 (PDT), sigvaldi <sigv...@binet.is>
> wrote:
>
> >On May 8, 10:03 pm, "David Eduardo" <da...@davideduardo.com> wrote:
>
> >> They are also the first country to go bankrupt, so inept was the fiscal
> >> policy of the nation.
>
> >Iceland did not go bankrupt, despite coming quite close.
>
> >> Further, putting all Haitians in a very small
> >> place likeIcelandwould result in an unsustainable environment.
>
> >The total land area of Iceland is almost 5 times greater than Haiti.
>
> The Blacks in Africa were primitive naked head hunter cannibals.
natives of the Canary Islands.
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> On Fri, 8 May 2009 15:03:31 -0700, "David Eduardo"
>
> <da...@davideduardo.com> wrote:
> >They are also the first country to go bankrupt, so inept was the fiscal
> >policy of the nation.
>
> All Jewish controlled countries have a horrible economic system:
Russia?
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> On Sat, 9 May 2009 10:50:14 -0700 (PDT), repo <Kcajy...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >You've been reading too many Hitler and Nazi propoganda which
> >are lies; then you repeat the lies which you know are lies.
>
> It's easy to prove that the media is a pack of liars. If they
> were not liars they would tell people that Hitler believed that the
> Jews controlled the media. Why don't they? Here are some quotes from
> Mein Kampf:
As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.
You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know
you can not measure up.
You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.
You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.
You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
National
Socialism.
Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor
children as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent
adults in a consensually sexual
way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be
it a prepubescent
boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.
That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
honest about it.
Michael
Topaz
Here is a quote from "The Battle for Berlin" by Joseph Goebbels:
We had no idea of the danger that threatened us then. I myself did not
yet know Marxism well enough to foresee the possible consequences. I
shrugged my shoulders as I read the dark prose of the red press and
awaited expectantly the decisive evening.
Around 8 p.m. we drove in an old rusty car from the city center to
Wedding. A cold gray mist hung under a starless sky. Our hearts were
bursting with impatience and expectation.
As we drove down M�llerstra�e it was already clear that the evening
did not bode well. Groups of dark figures stood on every street
corner. They apparently planned to teach our party members a bloody
lesson before they even got to the meeting.
Dark masses of people stood outside the Pharus Hall, expressing their
rage and hate with loud and impudent threats.
The leader of the protective forces cleared a way for us and reported
briefly that the hall had been packed since 7:15 p.m. and had been
closed by police. About two-thirds of the audience were Red Front
Fighters. That was what we wanted. There would be a decision. We were
ready to give it all we had.
Entering the hall, we encountered a warm, stiffling aroma of beer and
tobacco. The hall was hot. A lively roar of voices filled the hall.
People were packed in tightly. We reached the podium only with
difficulty.
No sooner was I recognized than hundreds of voices filled with rage
and revenge thundered in my ears: "Bloodhound! Murder of Workers!"
Those were the mildest words they shouted. But a welcoming group of
some party members and S.A. Men answered with passion. Excited battle
cries sounded from the platform. I saw immediately that we were a
minority, but a minority determined to fight, and therefore win.
It was still our custom then for an S.A. leader to chair all of the
party's public meetings. Here too. Tall as a tree he stood up front
and asked for silence with his upraised arm. That was easier said than
done. Mocking laughter was the answer. Insults flew toward the
platform from every corner of the room. People growled and screamed
and raged. There were world revolutionaries scattered about who
apparently had gained the courage they needed by drinking. It was
impossible to quiet the hall. The class-conscious proletariat had not
come to discuss but to fight, to break things up, to put an end to the
Fascist specter with callused workers' fists.
We were not uncertain, even for a moment. We also knew that if the
enemy did not succeed this time in what he had threatened, the future
success of the movement in Berlin was assured.
Fifteen or twenty S.A. and S.S. men stood before the platform in
uniforms and arm bands, an impudent and direct provocation to the Red
Front Fighters. Behind me was a select group of reliable people ready
at any moment to risk their lives to defend me from the onrushing red
mob with brutal force.
The Communists made an obvious mistake in their tactics. They had
scattered small groups throughout the hall, but clumped most of the
rest in the right rear of the hall. I recognized immediately that
there was the center of unrest, and if anything was to be done, we
first had to deal ruthlessly with them. Whenever the chair tried to
open the meeting, a dark chap stood up on a stool and shouted "Point
of Order!" Hundreds of others yelled the same after him.
If one takes from the mass their leader or also their seducer, they
are leaderless and easily controlled. Our tactic therefore was to
silence this cowardly troublemaker at any cost. He felt secure back
there, surrounded by his comrades. We tried to do this peacefully a
few times. The chair shouted over the uproar: "There will be
discussion afterward! But we determine the rules of order!"
That was an ineffective attempt at an unsuitable object. The screamer
wanted to throw the meeting into confusion by his endless shouts and
bring things to the boiling point. Then a general melee would result.
As our efforts to bring the meeting to order peacefully proved
unsuccessful, I took the head of the defensive forces to the side, and
immediately after groups of his men slipped through the thundering
Communist masses. Before the astonished and surprised Red Front troops
realized what was happening, our comrades had hauled the troublemaker
down from his stool and brought him through the raging crowd to the
podium. That was unexpected, but what followed was no surprise. A beer
glass flew through the air and crashed to the floor. That was the
signal for the first major meeting hall battle. Chairs were broken and
legs ripped from tables. Glasses and bottles suddenly appeared and all
hell broke loose. The battle raged for ten minutes. Glasses, bottles,
table and chair legs flew randomly through the air. A deafening roar
rose; the red beast was set free and wanted its victims.
At first it looked as if we were lost. The Communist attack was sudden
and explosive, completely unexpected. But soon the S.A. and S.S. men
distributed throughout the hall and in front of the platform recovered
from their surprise and counterattacked with bold courage. It quickly
became clear that although the Communist Party had masses behind it,
these masses became cowards when faced with a firmly disciplined and
determined opponent. They ran. In short order the red mob that had
come to break up our meeting had been driven from the hall. The order
that could not be secured by good will was gained by brute force.
Usually one is not aware of the stages of a meeting hall battle. Only
later does one recall them. I still remember a scene that I will never
forget; on the podium stood a young S.A. man whom I did not know. He
was hurling his missiles into the on-coming red mob. Suddenly a beer
glass thrown from the distance hit him on the head. A wide stream of
blood ran down his face. He sank with a cry. After a few seconds he
stood up again, grabbed water bottle from the table and threw it into
the hall, where it clattered against the head of an opponent.
The face of this young man is engraved in my memory. This
lightening-fast moment is unforgettable. This gravely-wounded S.A. man
would soon, and indeed for all times, become my most reliable and
loyal comrade.
Only after the red mob had been driven howling, growling and cursing
from the field could one tell how serious and costly the battle had
been. Ten lay in their blood on the platform, most with head injuries,
two with severe concussions. The table and stairs to the platform were
covered in blood. The whole hall resembled a field of ruins.
In the midst of this bloody and ruined wasteland, our tree-high S.A.
leader resumed his place and declared with iron calm: "The meeting
will continue. The speaker has the floor."
Never before or since have I spoken under such dramatic conditions.
Behind me, groaning in pain and bleeding, were seriously injured S.A.
comrades. Around me were broken chair legs, shattered beer glasses and
blood. The whole meeting was icily silent.
We lacked then a medical corps. Since we were in a proletarian
district, we had to have our seriously wounded carried out by
so-called worker volunteers. There were scenes outdoors of
unimaginable inhumanity. The bestial people who were supposedly
fighting for universal brotherhood insulted our poor and defenseless
injured with phases like: "Isn't that pig dead yet?"
Under such conditions it was impossible to give a coherent speech.
Scarcely had I begun to speak when another group of volunteers entered
the hall to carry off a seriously wounded S.A. man on a stretcher. One
of them, encountering the brutal apostles of humanity outside the door
and their unflattering and crude language, shouted for me in
desperation. His voice could be heard loudly and unmistakably on the
platform I interrupted my speech and went through the hall, where
there were still scattered Communist commando groups. Still surprised
by what had happened, they stood quietly and shyly to the side. I bade
farewell to the seriously wounded S.A. comrades.
Topaz
<meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Whites would build a paradise in any climate.
> Except the climate of central Europe, where there was this place
>they built with the phrase "Arbeit Macht Frei" signed over the main
>gate.
>
One of the prime ingredients in having a great nation is to be safe
from the evil race.
ADOLF HITLER
SCHWERIN, GUSTLOFF'S FUNERAL
SPEECH OF FEBRUARY 12, 1936
. . . BEHIND every murder stood the same power which is responsible
for this murder; behind these harmless insignificant fellow-countrymen
who were instigated and incited to crime stands the hate-filled power
of our Jewish foe, a foe to whom we had done no harm, but who none the
less sought to subjugate our German people and make of it its slave -
the foe who is responsible for all the misfortune that fell upon us in
1918, for all the misfortune which plagued Germany in the years that
followed. Those members of the Party and honorable comrades of ours
all fell, and the same fate was planned for others: many hundreds
survived as cripples or severely wounded, blinded or lamed; more than
40,000 others were injured. And among them were so many loyal folk
whom we all knew and who were near and dear to us, of whom we were
sure that they could never do any harm to anyone, that they had never
done any harm to anyone, whose only crime was that they devoted
themselves to the cause of Germany.
In the ranks of those whose lives were thus sacrificed there stood
also Horst Wessel, the singer who gave to the Movement its song, never
dreaming that he would join those spirits who march and have marched
with us.
And now on foreign soil National Socialism has gained its first
conscious martyr - a man who did nothing save to enter the lists for
Germany which is not only his sacred right but his duty in this world:
a man who did nothing save remember his homeland and pledge himself to
her in loyalty. He, too, was murdered, just like so many others. Even
at the time when on January 30 three years ago we had come into power,
precisely the same things happened in Germany, at Frankfort on the
Oder, at K�penick, and again at Brunswick. The procedure was always
the same: a few men come and call someone out of his house and then
stab or shoot him down.
That is no chance: it is the same guiding hand which organized these
crimes and purposes to do so again. Now for the first time one who is
responsible for these acts has appeared in his own person. For the
first time he employs no harmless German fellow-countryman. It is a
title to fame for Switzerland, as it is for our own Germans in
Switzerland, that no one let himself be hired to do this deed so that
for the first time the spiritual begetter of the act must himself
perform the act. So our comrade has fallen a victim to that power
which wages a fanatical warfare not only against our German people but
against every free, autonomous, and independent people. We understand
the challenge to battle and we take up the gage! My dear comrade! You
have not fallen in vain!
Topaz
The Real Cost Of US Support
For Israel - $3 Trillion
By Christopher Bollyn
9-19-3
While it is commonly reported that Israel officially receives some $3
billion every year in the form of economic aid from the U.S.
government, this figure is just the tip of the iceberg. There are many
billions of dollars more in hidden costs and economic losses lurking
beneath the surface. A recently published economic analysis has
concluded that U.S. support for the state of Israel has cost American
taxpayers nearly $3 trillion ($3 million millions) in 2002 dollars.
"The Costs to American Taxpayers of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict:
$3 Trillion" is a summary of economic research done by Thomas R.
Stauffer. Stauffer's summary of the research was published in the
June 2003 issue of The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.
Stauffer is a Washington, D.C.-based engineer and economist who writes
and teaches about the economics of energy and the Middle East.
Stauffer has taught at Harvard University and Georgetown University's
School of Foreign Service. Stauffer's findings were first presented at
an October 2002 conference sponsored by the U.S. Army College and the
University of Maine.
Stauffer's analysis is "an estimate of the total cost to the U.S.
alone of instability and conflict in the region - which emanates from
the core Israeli-Palestinian conflict."
"Total identifiable costs come to almost $3 trillion," Stauffer says.
"About 60 percent, well over half, of those costs - about $1.7
trillion - arose from the U.S. defense of Israel, where most of that
amount has been incurred since 1973."
"Support for Israel comes to $1.8 trillion, including special trade
advantages, preferential contracts, or aid buried in other accounts.
In addition to the financial outlay, U.S. aid to Israel costs some
275,000 American jobs each year." The trade-aid imbalance alone with
Israel of between $6-10 billion costs about 125,000 American jobs
every year, Stauffer says.
The largest single element in the costs has been the series of
oil-supply crises that have accompanied the Israeli-Arab wars and the
construction of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. �?To date these have
cost the U.S. $1.5 trillion (2002 dollars), excluding the additional
costs incurred since 2001,�? Stauffer wrote.
The cost of supporting Israel increased drastically after the 1973
Israeli-Arab war. U.S. support for Israel during that war resulted in
additional costs for the American taxpayer of between $750 billion and
$1 trillion, Stauffer says.
When Israel was losing the war, President Richard Nixon stepped in to
supply the Jewish state with U.S. weapons. Nixon's intervention
triggered the Arab oil embargo which Stauffer estimates cost the U.S.
as much as $600 billion in lost GDP and another $450 in higher oil
import costs.
"The 1973 oil crisis, all in all, cost the U.S. economy no less than
$900 billion, and probably as much as $1,200 billion," he says.
As a result of the oil embargo the United States created the Strategic
Petroleum Reserve (SPR) to "insulate Israel and the U.S. against the
wielding of a future Arab 'oil weapon'." The billion-barrel SPR has
cost U.S. taxpayers $134 billion to date. According to an Oil Supply
Guarantee, which former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger provided
Israel in 1975, Israel gets 'first call' on any oil available to the
U.S. if Israel's oil supply is stopped.
Stauffer's $3 trillion figure is conservative as it does not include
the increased costs incurred during the year-long buildup to the
recent war against Iraq in which Israel played a significant, albeit
covert, role. The higher oil prices that occurred as a result of the
Anglo-American campaign against Iraq were absorbed by the consumers.
The increase in oil prices provided a huge bonus for the leading oil
companies such as British Petroleum and Shell, who are major oil
producers as well as retailers. The major international oil companies
recorded record profits for the first quarter of 2003.
The Washington Report seeks to "provide the American public with
balanced and accurate information concerning U.S. relations with
Middle Eastern states." The monthly journal is known for keeping close
tabs on the amount of U.S. taxpayer money that goes to Israel and how
much pro-Israel money flows back to Members of Congress in the form of
campaign aid.
The journal's website, www.wrmea.com, has an up-to-date counter at the
top that indicates how much official aid flows to Israel. While the
counter currently stands at $88.2 billion, it only reflects the
minimum, as it does not include the many hidden costs.
"The distinction is important, because the indirect or consequential
losses suffered by the U.S. as a result of its blind support for
Israel exceed by many times the substantial amount of direct aid to
Israel," Shirl McArthur wrote in the May 2003 issue of Washington
Report.
McArthur's article, "A Conservative Tally of Total Direct U.S. Aid to
Israel: $97.5 Billion - and Counting" tallies the hidden costs, such
as interest lost due to the early disbursement of aid to Israel and
funds hidden in other accounts. For example, Israel received $5.45
billion in Defense Department funding of Israeli weapons projects
through 2002, McArthur says.
Loans made to Israel by the U.S. government, like the recently awarded
$9 billion, invariably wind up being paid by the American taxpayer. A
recent Congressional Research Service report indicates that Israel has
received $42 billion in waived loans. "Therefore, it is reasonable to
consider all government loans to Israel the same as grants," McArthur
says.
Support for Israel has cost America dearly - well over than $10,000
per
American - however the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been extremely
costly for the entire world. According to Stauffer, the total bill for
supporting Israel is two to four times higher than that for the U.S.
alone -
costing the global community an estimated $6 to $12 trillion
http://www.rense.com/general41/trill.htm
Topaz
You overlook the fact that the Jews control your media and your
schools and your mind.
"Anything good in Western civilization is said to have been stolen
from Black Africa including the English language. Professors claim
that Egyptians were blacks and that Aristotle stole his ideas from the
Egyptian library in Alexandria. The "distinguished scholars" who make
these claims are not sufficiently learned to know that the library was
built after the death of Aristotle. One know-nothing, Martin Bernal,
at Cornell (of course) ignores the Mycenaen, Achaean, Dorian and
Ionian wells of ancient Greek culture in
order to attribute the origins of Greek culture to Africa.
The white kids who attend Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Cornell,
Stanford, Michigan, University of California, Duke, wherever, are
enculturated into a pathology of guilt over evils allegedly
perpetrated by their forebears. They are brainwashed into accepting
unequal rights and limitations on their speech as atonements for the
sins of their fathers. Those who resist are sentenced to "sensitivity
training," accused of various harassment crimes, and expelled...
"Academics have buried Western civilization under a mountain of
lies. The great books are not burned, but they are discredited with
the charge that the great thinkers in the past were apologists for a
"white hegemonic order."
The erasing of our culture progresses rapidly. Several years ago
it came to light that students in an Illinois public school were being
taught that the ancient Egyptians were blacks who flew among the
pyramids until whites arrived and killed the blacks who could fly. The
reasons given for teaching this nonsense was to improve the
self-esteem of black children and to explain to them why they don't
live in the big houses."
Paul Craig Roberts is a columnist for The Washington Times and is
nationally syndicated.
Dave Heil
> On Sun, 10 May 2009 02:38:01 +0000, Dave Heil <k8...@frontiernet.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>> No, they don't. The cylinders of Zyklon B,
>
> Zyklon B is an insecticide. Many lives were saved because the killed
> the lice which spread disease.
You know better, you spinner of deception. Zyklon B is a poison gas
which kills human beings. Nobody need fittings on the outside of a
building to feed Zyklon B inside for the killing of insects.
>
>> the fittings which match the
>> cylinders and fed the shower rooms, those prove gassing.
>
>
> "The Zyklon B was supposed to have been
> dropped down through holes in the roof. But we have photographs of
> the roof of Krema II, and there are no holes in the roof. Some
> holocaust tale-tellers claim the Zyklon-B was dropped into hollow
> pillars. But the ruins of Krema II are still there, and there are no
> hollow pillars to be seen. Some say the Zyklon B was lowered in a wire
> mesh basket. No wire mesh basket was ever found.
>
> In fact, no physical evidence has ever been found to support even
> one of the silly holocaust gassing stories. No holes, no hollow
> pillars, no wire mesh baskets, no Zyklon B residue in the walls, and
> no special ventillation fans. What's more, there is not a sign of
> physical remains of hundreds of thousands of bodies of victims who
> were supposed to be gassed.
You need to quite reading so much revisionist crap and start looking at
actual evidence. It is easily available.
> All we have is talk, talk, talk--tales, tales, tales--moaning,
> lamentations, whining, and finger-pointing. We have movies, TV
> programs, magazine articles, essays, opinions, lectures, and
> legends--but no physical evidence.
>
> Leuchter went to auschwitz looking for some physical evidence of
> gas chambers. He found nothing, the same thing everyone else found
> over the last fifty years. Leuchter was right on every point: no gas
> chambers at Auschwitz."
Leuchter is a discredited liar. I already provided Wikipedia's writeup
of him. Why do you ignore it?
>>> Pictures of dead Germans killed by the allies in
>>> Dresen were also said to be pictures of dead Jews.
>> Maybe by you, not by any credible source.
>
> It was proven beyond doubt in the Spotlight.
The crackpot newsletter from the Liberty Lobby? Do you read anything
which isn't produced by some screwball?
Dave Heil
> On Sun, 10 May 2009 02:34:05 +0000, Dave Heil <k8...@frontiernet.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>>> 1.The harrowing scenes of dead and dying inmates were not the result
>>> of a German policy of "extermination," but rather the result of
>>> epidemics of typhus and other disease brought about largely by the
>>> effects of Allied aerial attacks.
>> Where were the bomb craters, Topie?
>>
>> What about the German films of guards shooting inmates at the edge of a pit?
>
> Actually it was Communists doing the shooting. And the Germans were
> fighting against Communism.
>
You're a fabricator and a deceiver, Topie. Your lies are so transparent
that anyone of average intelligence will see right through them
Why defend monsters? Why adopt the views of monsters? Why adopt the
behavior of monsters?
Dave Heil
Michael Ejercito
> Here is a quote from "The Battle for Berlin" by Joseph Goebbels:
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> On Tue, 12 May 2009 08:23:52 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
> >> Whites would build a paradise in any climate.
> > Except the climate of central Europe, where there was this place
> >they built with the phrase "Arbeit Macht Frei" signed over the main
> >gate.
>
> One of the prime ingredients in having a great nation is to be safe
> from the evil race.
>
Michael Ejercito
> On Tue, 12 May 2009 08:25:18 -0700 (PDT),Michael Ejercito
>
>
>
> <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On May 11, 5:26 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 11 May 2009 06:07:43 -0700 (PDT), sigvaldi <sigv...@binet.is>
> >> wrote:
> >> >The total land area of Iceland is almost 5 times greater than Haiti.
>
> >> The Blacks in Africa were primitive naked head hunter cannibals.
> > They had a lot in common with the Celts and the Picts and the
> >natives of the Canary Islands.
>
> You overlook the fact that the Jews control your media and your
> schools and your mind.
northern Europe were barbarians came from the Jews?
Michael