Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

NO TERRORISTS AT FT. HOOD???

3 views
Skip to first unread message

DGVREIMAN

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 10:57:47 PM10/30/12
to

NO TERRORISTS AT FT. HOOD!


The Obama administration is maintaining the thirteen murders at Ft.
Hood, and the scores of wounded, all shot by an Army Major howling
"Allah is Great" - after directly communicating with a radical Islamic
terrorist for months, and after being promoted to Major after spewing
hate speech against America and its troops for YEARS - was nothing
more than an act of "Workplace Violence!"

Now if you believe that I have some real good property in Benghazi to
sell you - it might be a little burnt, a few American bodies laying
around, but you can be sure the Obama administration has never heard
of it, so it is for sale for sure. . . . .

(Tom Rau (Dai Uy) whines for references for anything he disagrees with
(not something he agrees with) so I thought I had better post one
although I cannot think of a single veteran that is not pissed off
about this issue - well - maybe Rau, but see below:)

http://tinyurl.com/9qz6jhe

"Already facing intense scrutiny for its shifting narrative about the
assault on the U.S. Consulate in Libya, the Pentagon now says it will
not reclassify the Fort Hood shootings as a terrorist attack over
concern about biasing the case against the gunman -- an argument that
is getting a mixed review from legal specialists.

Late Friday, after 160 victims of the Fort Hood, Texas, shooting
called on the Pentagon to label the attack terrorism instead of
workplace violence as it has for the past three years, the Department
of Defense said it would not reclassify the attack."

End excerpts:

Doug Says: Hmmmm - amazing this website also questions the "shifting
narrative" about the Benghazi murders where the Obama administration
(1) refused to send help to the men trapped and fighting for their
lives although they requested it three times, and (2) violated the age
old rule that our military will NEVER leave anyone behind again - like
we did in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia (RE; the Book "An Enormous Crime"
which proves our fearless screaming political liberal leaders at the
time did in fact knowingly leave American GI POW's at the mercy of the
Commies, who of course enslaved them until they died or were
murdered).

The idiotic, ridiculous AND preposterous notion that an act of
terrorism did not occur at Ft. Hood, and now also at Benghazi, should
tell you what you need to know about the veracity of the Obama
Administration. Commander in Chief - sure, right. Honor - sure,
right.


The Father of one of the slain Navy Seals that was murdered at
Benghazi said on Fox news yesterday that (I am paraphrasing) "he was
lied to by the Obama administration, and he would like to know the
name of the person in the White House that refused his son's request
for help as he believes that person has his son's blood on his hands."
(RE Fox news Hannity).

The No man left behind rule obviously does not apply to politicians
from the Democratic party - and we have two cases in point to prove
that fact: Vietnam, and now Benghazi.

You get to vote your opinion on this issue soon on November 6, 2012 -
don't forget to do so.

Doug Grant (Tm)





Dai Uy

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 6:51:13 PM10/31/12
to
On Oct 30, 4:57 pm, "DGVREIMAN" <dgvrei...@comcast.net> wrote:
> NO TERRORISTS AT FT. HOOD!

>
> Doug Says:   Hmmmm - amazing this website also questions the "shifting
> narrative" about the Benghazi murders where the Obama administration
> (1) refused to send help to the men trapped and fighting for their
> lives although they requested it three times, and (2) violated the age
> old rule that our military will NEVER leave anyone behind again - like
> we did in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia (RE; the Book "An Enormous Crime"
> which proves our fearless screaming political liberal leaders at the
> time did in fact knowingly leave American GI POW's at the mercy of the
> Commies, who of course enslaved them until they died or were
> murdered).
>

See URL: http://www.miafacts.org/reagan%20on%20hendon.htm



Ronald Reagans' Opinon of Bill Hendon:
". . . off his rocker."



First, some background. In the summer of 2007, former Congressman
Bill Hendon published a book titled An Enormous Crime. In this book,
Hendon uses official documents to "prove" that hundreds of American
POWs were abandoned in SEAsia and that the US government has been
covering up this abandonment. As I have described in many places on
this website, these claims are complete nonsense -- and Hendon is one
of the primary purveyors of this crap, but that doesn't stop him.

About the same time that Hendon's book was released, Ronald Reagan's
White House diaries were released. Reagan had this to say about
Hendon's POW-MIA claims (quoted from the Raleigh, NC, News and
Observer).

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Ronald Reagan wasn't impressed with a North Carolina representative's
claims about MIAs.

According to the recently published "The Reagan Diaries," the
president thought then Rep. Bill Hendon was "off his rocker" after a
meeting in 1986.

Hendon, an Asheville Republican, and New Hampshire Rep. Bob Smith met
with Reagan on Jan. 9, 1996, to talk about the possibility that
Vietnam was still holding American prisoners of war.

Afterward, the Great Communicator wrote in his diary:

"Bill is way out yonder on the issue of M.I.A.'s. He claims Mil.
Intelligence has all sorts of proof that Vietnam is holding live
prisoners but the bureaucracy is covering it up from even the Sec. of
Defense, etc."

Reagan then notes that he sent Vice President George Bush to check out
some of the stories, one of which involved the president in a meeting
that never took place.

"Geo. reported back after lunch. I'm afraid Bill is off his rocker—
even Bob (who said nothing in our meeting) told Geo. he can't go along
with Bill on his rantings."

A week later, Reagan met with staff about the issue again.

"The lady who heads the M.I.A.-P.O.W. family organization gave further
evidence that Cong. man Bill Hendon is absolutely wrong in his wild
charges that our govt. has info about the P.O.W.'s & is covering it
up."

Hendon later became an M.I.A. activist, chaining himself to the gate
of a U.S. office in Vietnam.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

See also: http://www.miafacts.org/hendon.htm
http://www.miafacts.org/hendcnct.htm
http://www.miafacts.org/islefort.htm

***

︰ones

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 10:14:58 PM10/31/12
to
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:57:47 -0700, in alt.war.vietnam "DGVREIMAN"
<dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote:

>The Obama administration is maintaining the thirteen murders at Ft.
>Hood, and the scores of wounded, all shot by an Army Major howling
>"Allah is Great" - after directly communicating with a radical Islamic
>terrorist for months, and after being promoted to Major after spewing
>hate speech against America and its troops for YEARS - was nothing
>more than an act of "Workplace Violence!"

Moron! Ten of the people shot were found to have been accident prone.
The other three were just having a bad day.

Jones

DGVREIMAN

unread,
Nov 4, 2012, 6:34:38 AM11/4/12
to
"Dai Uy" <Dai...@Hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:d0ef0117-5ac1-46ba...@o5g2000pbd.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 30, 4:57 pm, "DGVREIMAN" <dgvrei...@comcast.net> wrote:
> NO TERRORISTS AT FT. HOOD!

> (Tom Rau (Dai Uy) whines for references for anything he disagrees
> with
> (not something he agrees with) so I thought I had better post one
> although I cannot think of a single veteran that is not pissed off
> about this issue - well - maybe Rau, but see below:)
>
> http://tinyurl.com/9qz6jhe
>

From your reference above...

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Labeling the shootings workplace violence instead of terrorism, he
said, "makes perfect sense" because it's a simple cut-and-dried murder
case without getting into the complexities of the military's law of
war and whether it's appropriate to consider Maj. Hasan an unlawful
combatant.

Mr. Rau, the legal issue of whether it is better or not to try the
Terrorist Hassan as a terrorist is a red herring - Major Hassan is
going to be convicted in either case. The evidence against him is
overwhelming. Several other terrorists have already been convicted in
Federal court - and not calling the act in Ft. Hood what it really was
has nothing to do with trials and courts, it has everything to do with
Obama politics - hiding the fact that a terrible act of terrorism
happened on his watch, under his nose, and denying the troops that
were killed or wounded combat status is also the key issue.

Doug Grant (Tm)


0 new messages