> > On Nov 10, 10:51 am, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
> >> On 11/10/2012 09:42 AM, wy wrote:
> >>> On Nov 10, 10:37 am, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 11/10/2012 09:13 AM, wy wrote:
> >>>>> On Nov 10, 9:49 am, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 11/10/2012 07:37 AM, ColdWarDinosaur wrote:
> >>>>>>> They are doubling down and will be going for impeachment instead. Just
> >>>>>>> like the good old days. They are going to try to stop Obama by making
> >>>>>>> the conversation ONLY about Benghazi. Not jobs, not the economy, not
> >>>>>>> anything meaningful for the public that kicked them in the nuts, only
> >>>>>>> Benghazi. Thats it, the sole topic of conversation (unless some of
> >>>>>>> them become infected by sanity).
> >>>>>>> This could be a Congressional version of Pickett's Charge...
> >>>>>> If Obama did indeed lie about, and try to cover up what happened at
> >>>>>> Behghazi, then he derserves to be impeached. As a practical matter, such
> >>>>>> an impeachment is a wast of time with the current makeup of the Senate.
> >>>>>> The Democrat majority will refuse to convict, and they will be aided by
> >>>>>> the same spineless Republicans who refused to convict Clinton.
> >>>>>> It would be a better use of time and resources for conservatives to
> >>>>>> concentrate on creating a truly conservative political party with
> >>>>>> national credibility.
> >>>>> The problem with that is that they'd have to broaden their views
> >>>>> beyond that embraced in the confederate states, where Romney got the
> >>>>> bulk of his votes, at least two-thirds just from half the states he
> >>>>> won. It's 3/4 if you include Florida as a win for him. The rest of
> >>>>> the country doesn't think like the confederate states and that's why
> >>>>> especially from this point forward Repugnants are going to have one
> >>>>> hell of a time in reclaiming the White House again - because they live
> >>>>> by their own conservatism which, by definition, means they're
> >>>>> resistant to change.
> >>>> You do realize that the civil war ended 150 years ago?
> >>> Not for a lot of those in the South, as proven by the majority of
> >>> votes Romney got from them. Otherwise, his votes would've been more
> >>> evenly spread across the country in terms of percentages if there was
> >>> something really in common between southern right wingnuts and the
> >>> rest of the country's right wingnuts.
> >> Have you seen a county by county breakdown of the election?
> "ColdWarDinosaur" <wynnehen...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:k7m5i2$o5m$2@dont-email.me...
>> On 11/10/2012 1:00 PM, Daniel W. Rouse Jr. wrote:
>>> "ColdWarDinosaur" <wynnehen...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:k7llb9$l16$1@dont-email.me...
>>>> They are doubling down and will be going for impeachment instead.
>>>> Just
>>>> like the good old days. They are going to try to stop Obama by making
>>>> the conversation ONLY about Benghazi. Not jobs, not the economy, not
>>>> anything meaningful for the public that kicked them in the nuts, only
>>>> Benghazi. Thats it, the sole topic of conversation (unless some of
>>>> them become infected by sanity).
>>> If Benghazi is a high crime and misdemenor, there need be no further
>>> discussion than to go for impeachment.
>>> When planning to impeach the president, there doesn't need to be any
>>> consideration about any good done for the country. Is there a high
>>> crime and misdemeanor? Yes? Can it be an impeachable offense? Yes?
>>> Then there isn't any further discussion, go for impeachment.
>> Total crap. You clearly don't care about the USA as a whole, only
>> about your backward, racist, misogynistic, plutocratic agenda. There
>> is NO way forward for the GOP unless they ditch people like you. You
>> have no growth path with single women, Hispanics, Blacks, the educated
>> and Fox has lied you into early senility.
> Did you get that from the talking heads on MSNBC? Chris Matthews,
> Rachel Maddow, Ed Schultz, et. al.
> I don't know, I don't care, but you bash FOX News?
Good luck with your party.
-- ~~
HW
__________________
The GOP Claim TO Be Christian but:
Are Capitalist Extremists.
Support Law of the Jungle, Survival of the Richest.
Are Racists.
Are Pro-War.
Are Pro-Torture.
Are Pro-Execution.
Are Pro-Money-lender.
Despise Human Rights.
Despise The Poor.
Despise Women.
They appear to be against everything Jesus stood for.
Who are these people really??
> On Nov 10, 12:16 pm, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
>> On 11/10/2012 10:17 AM, wy wrote:
>>> On Nov 10, 10:51 am, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
>>>> On 11/10/2012 09:42 AM, wy wrote:
>>>>> On Nov 10, 10:37 am, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/10/2012 09:13 AM, wy wrote:
>>>>>>> On Nov 10, 9:49 am, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2012 07:37 AM, ColdWarDinosaur wrote:
>>>>>>>>> They are doubling down and will be going for impeachment instead. Just
>>>>>>>>> like the good old days. They are going to try to stop Obama by making
>>>>>>>>> the conversation ONLY about Benghazi. Not jobs, not the economy, not
>>>>>>>>> anything meaningful for the public that kicked them in the nuts, only
>>>>>>>>> Benghazi. Thats it, the sole topic of conversation (unless some of
>>>>>>>>> them become infected by sanity).
>>>>>>>>> This could be a Congressional version of Pickett's Charge...
>>>>>>>> If Obama did indeed lie about, and try to cover up what happened at
>>>>>>>> Behghazi, then he derserves to be impeached. As a practical matter, such
>>>>>>>> an impeachment is a wast of time with the current makeup of the Senate.
>>>>>>>> The Democrat majority will refuse to convict, and they will be aided by
>>>>>>>> the same spineless Republicans who refused to convict Clinton.
>>>>>>>> It would be a better use of time and resources for conservatives to
>>>>>>>> concentrate on creating a truly conservative political party with
>>>>>>>> national credibility.
>>>>>>> The problem with that is that they'd have to broaden their views
>>>>>>> beyond that embraced in the confederate states, where Romney got the
>>>>>>> bulk of his votes, at least two-thirds just from half the states he
>>>>>>> won. It's 3/4 if you include Florida as a win for him. The rest of
>>>>>>> the country doesn't think like the confederate states and that's why
>>>>>>> especially from this point forward Repugnants are going to have one
>>>>>>> hell of a time in reclaiming the White House again - because they live
>>>>>>> by their own conservatism which, by definition, means they're
>>>>>>> resistant to change.
>>>>>> You do realize that the civil war ended 150 years ago?
>>>>> Not for a lot of those in the South, as proven by the majority of
>>>>> votes Romney got from them. Otherwise, his votes would've been more
>>>>> evenly spread across the country in terms of percentages if there was
>>>>> something really in common between southern right wingnuts and the
>>>>> rest of the country's right wingnuts.
>>>> Have you seen a county by county breakdown of the election?
> > On Nov 10, 12:16 pm, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
> >> On 11/10/2012 10:17 AM, wy wrote:
> >>> On Nov 10, 10:51 am, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 11/10/2012 09:42 AM, wy wrote:
> >>>>> On Nov 10, 10:37 am, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 11/10/2012 09:13 AM, wy wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Nov 10, 9:49 am, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 11/10/2012 07:37 AM, ColdWarDinosaur wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> They are doubling down and will be going for impeachment instead. Just
> >>>>>>>>> like the good old days. They are going to try to stop Obama by making
> >>>>>>>>> the conversation ONLY about Benghazi. Not jobs, not the economy, not
> >>>>>>>>> anything meaningful for the public that kicked them in the nuts, only
> >>>>>>>>> Benghazi. Thats it, the sole topic of conversation (unless some of
> >>>>>>>>> them become infected by sanity).
> >>>>>>>>> This could be a Congressional version of Pickett's Charge...
> >>>>>>>> If Obama did indeed lie about, and try to cover up what happened at
> >>>>>>>> Behghazi, then he derserves to be impeached. As a practical matter, such
> >>>>>>>> an impeachment is a wast of time with the current makeup of the Senate.
> >>>>>>>> The Democrat majority will refuse to convict, and they will be aided by
> >>>>>>>> the same spineless Republicans who refused to convict Clinton.
> >>>>>>>> It would be a better use of time and resources for conservatives to
> >>>>>>>> concentrate on creating a truly conservative political party with
> >>>>>>>> national credibility.
> >>>>>>> The problem with that is that they'd have to broaden their views
> >>>>>>> beyond that embraced in the confederate states, where Romney got the
> >>>>>>> bulk of his votes, at least two-thirds just from half the states he
> >>>>>>> won. It's 3/4 if you include Florida as a win for him. The rest of
> >>>>>>> the country doesn't think like the confederate states and that's why
> >>>>>>> especially from this point forward Repugnants are going to have one
> >>>>>>> hell of a time in reclaiming the White House again - because they live
> >>>>>>> by their own conservatism which, by definition, means they're
> >>>>>>> resistant to change.
> >>>>>> You do realize that the civil war ended 150 years ago?
> >>>>> Not for a lot of those in the South, as proven by the majority of
> >>>>> votes Romney got from them. Otherwise, his votes would've been more
> >>>>> evenly spread across the country in terms of percentages if there was
> >>>>> something really in common between southern right wingnuts and the
> >>>>> rest of the country's right wingnuts.
> >>>> Have you seen a county by county breakdown of the election?
> >>> 2/3 of the total national votes came from just 11 confederate states.
> >>> 3/4 if you factor in Florida.
> >> Which means nothing. The Confederacy ceased to exist 150 years ago.
> > It's still in the DNA of southerners. Otherwise, they wouldn't have
> > given Romney 2/3 (3/4 with Florida) of the Repugnant votes he got.
> Really?
> Show cause and effect.
The volume of the votes prove it. Just think about it. Only a
quarter to a third voted for Romney in the rest of the country, while
the majority of his votes came from just all 11 (12 with Florida)
confederate states. How many states in the US? 50? And Romney got
approximately 70% of his votes concentrated in just 1/5th of the
states? If that doesn't scream Southern right wingnut regionalism,
well, then you tell me what does.
> > On Nov 10, 8:49 am, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
> > > It would be a better use of time and resources for conservatives
> > > to concentrate on creating a truly conservative political party
> > > with national credibility.
> > It will go like this:
> > - "Let's start a truly conservative party!!!"
> > - A large percentage of conservative America: "Yeah!! Where do I send
> > my contributions???"
> > - "Ehem, there is one caveat, though: This time, bigotry will not be
> > tolerated..."
> > - crickets...
> > - "Hello? Where is everybody?" (*)
> > Don't believe me, David. You thing I am imagining things? Want some
> > evidence?
> > Ladies and and Gentlemen of the Jury, Your Honor, if it please the
> > Court I present:
> > THE TEA PARTY.
> > Q.E.D.
> > "Past is prologue" -S. Palin
> > -Ramon
> > (*) More seriously: If you take any substantial action trying to
> > repress the DNA-ingrained tendencies of such group who naturally
> > gravitates around the GOP, your new spanking shiny party will be Epic
> > ==> FAIL. The only political factors who are trying to find a way
> > around this existential conundrum are Jeb Bush and Lindsay Graham.
> > GOP, don't alienate Latino voters - Frog - Scorpion - It is in my
> > nature
On Nov 10, 11:16 am, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
> Which means nothing. The Confederacy ceased to exist 150 years ago.
And so did the Nazis. Their ideology, however, is very much alive and
kicking. Is your blindness before all those CSA flags being waved
TODAY (at TP events, for instance) a handicap being conferred upon you
by nature or by choice?
Answer this:
- Are you satisfied with the GOP position towards minorities
(including single women and gays)??
- Do you think such position had any effect whatsoever last Tuesday?
-Ramon
ps: Where is the study linking the Democratic Party to Hate Groups???
(can't find it!!)
Meanwhile, this report by the Institute for Research and Education on
Human Rights details multiple links between Hate Groups and the Tea
Party.
> In article <a_ydnUKJHtkY9APNnZ2dnUVZ_qmdn...@giganews.com>,
> David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
>> If Obama did indeed lie about, and try to cover up what happened at
>> Behghazi, then he derserves to be impeached.
> Gee, 4 Americans dead in Benghazi compared to George Bush's lying and
> covering up about Iraq's WMDs, which cost 4,486 American deaths
> beginning in 2003 and untold hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi
> lives.
Just the kind of disaster the Republicans need....an attempt to impeach Obama.
Republicans will NEVER let it happen.
They remember to cost to them of the Clinton impeachment.
Hartung is an idiot
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 11:20:10 -0600, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com>
wrote:
>On 11/10/2012 10:08 AM, Morgoth Bauglir wrote:
>>> It would be a better use of time and resources for conservatives to
>>> concentrate on creating a truly conservative political party with
>>> national credibility.
>> That's impossible.
>Possibly, but in 1994 there were many who claimed it was impossible that >the Republicans could take both houses of Congress, yet they did just that.
Everybody needs to relax and conserve
for the coming hard times, regardless if the
plan is to pull a Hoover or an FDR, the hard
times are coming.
What the Fed does is the same as they
did during the 1930s, one difference is that
even at $2000 an ounce, there isn't enough
gold to worry about people buying that in
place of spending on manufactured products.
Even without imports, there is not going
to be enough jobs, and prices and insurance
have expanded enough so there is a huge
shortage of money in the right places.
Things that were not even considered
in the 1930s or any recession need to be
tried, do something, dummies, even if it
does not fix things, at least you could say
you tried.
Ramon is a foreign transplant originally from Venezuela, probably a
beaner terrorist, and definitely a Fraud. Ramon F Herrera also goes by
"Cambridge Ray," "Google Poster," "Lucius Sanctimonious," and
"Hadron." An ultra-left, open-borders pretend-American. He lives and
works in Houston, TX. Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you
encourage them to continue lying.
Ramon F Herrera
13313 Cutten Rd, Apt 7102
Houston, TX 77069-2374
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:47:34 -0700 (PDT), Ramon F Herrera
<gopos...@jonjay.com> wrote:
>ps: The Bay of Pigs fiasco was a Nixon deal
LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Bay of Pigs Invasion was an unsuccessful action by a CIA-trained
force of Cuban exiles to invade southern Cuba, with support and
encouragement from the US government, in an attempt to overthrow the
Cuban government of Fidel Castro. The invasion was launched in April
1961, less than three months after John F. Kennedy assumed the
presidency in the United States.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bay_of_Pigs_Invasion
Ramon is a foreign transplant originally from Venezuela, probably a
beaner terrorist, and definitely a Fraud. Ramon F Herrera also goes by
"Cambridge Ray," "Google Poster," "Lucius Sanctimonious," and
"Hadron." An ultra-left, open-borders pretend-American. He lives and
works in Houston, TX. Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you
encourage them to continue lying.
Ramon F Herrera
13313 Cutten Rd, Apt 7102
Houston, TX 77069-2374
The Register reported Bachman is "in a different league from the other
candidates," receiving a bigger favorable rating (65 percent) than any
of the other candidates and a very low negative rating (12 percent)
among Iowa Republicans.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/27/iowa-poll-bachmann-favorable...
"DennisM" is a decidedly feminine poster, he/she/it is either a woman
or a homosexual man. When 'it' isn't lying, which is most of the time,
'it' is usually masturbating. Please note that when you reply to a
homosexual man they get all excited and when you reply to a Liar you
encourage them to continue lying.
'Lickin' Ass and Fakin' Military Service' is a Proven Fraud, a Proven
Liar, a Proven Thief, and recently a Proven Malicious Poster. She is
the most prolific liar in this newsgroup and also the most prolific
thief of other's writings. She is also a Stolen Valor stain on
America. Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you encourage them
to continue lying.
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 22:11:21 -0400, Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
<PopUlist...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Clandestine intell ops can be approved by Agency heads and they can
>delegate this authority to the O-6 or SES level.
>Covert ops require a PDM -- Presidential Decision Memo.
Oops! Again we find that you don't kn ow what you're talking and
lying...
They have NEVER officially been called PDMs:
NSCID National Security Council Intelligence Directives 1947–1977
NSAM National Security Action Memorandums 1961–1969
NSSM National Security Study Memorandums 1969–1977
NSDM National Security Decision Memorandums 1969–1977
PRM Presidential Review Memorandums 1977–1981
PD Presidential Directives 1977–1981
NSSD National Security Study Directives 1981–1989
NSDD National Security Decision Directives 1981–1989
NSR National Security Reviews 1989–1993
NSD National Security Directives 1989–1993
PRD Presidential Review Directive 1993–2001
PDD Presidential Decision Directives 1993–2001
NSPD National Security Presidential Directives 2001–2009
HSPD Homeland Security Presidential Directives 2001–
PSD Presidential Study Directives 2009–
PPD Presidential Policy Directives 2009–
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_directive
"DennisM" is a decidedly feminine poster, he/she/it is either a woman
or a homosexual man. When 'it' isn't lying, which is most of the time,
'it' is usually masturbating. Please note that when you reply to a
homosexual man they get all excited and when you reply to a Liar you
encourage them to continue lying.
<denni...@dennism3.invalid> wrote:
>In article <PLKdnQpDIt5ATRTNnZ2dnUVZ5uEAA...@giganews.com>,
> Marvin the Martian <mar...@ontomars.org> wrote:
>> As back up, Obama is relying on flat out voter fraud: >Except the only ones documented as having committed voting fraud so far >this election cycle are Republicans.
Sid is considered less of a liar and more of a senile idiot, possibly
an actual retard under medical supervision. Sid'sd lies are mostly
intended to get attention because he is a desperately lonely old fool
nearing the end of a generally failed life. Note that when you reply
to a Proven Liar you encourage them to continue lying.
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 14:25:00 -0400, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
wrote:
>Senior terrorists killed(mostly) or captured during Obama's administration:
>Abdul Ghani Beradar
LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar born c. 1968), also called Mullah Baradar
Akhund or Mullah Brother, is a co-founder of the Taliban movement in
Afghanistan and an Afghan Taliban leader. He was captured in Pakistan
by Pakistani forces, on February 8, 2010, in a morning raid.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdul_Ghani_Baradar
Lora D. (previously posted as "Uno Hu," currently posting as "Jay
Herblock") is a complete crackpot. Believes 9/11 was an inside job,
has seen UFOs and black helicopters and is on a first-name basis with
ass-probing space aliens... She is also an admitted Communist:
"Actually, its time to club repooplicon billionaires on the head and
take their stolen profits and give them back to the general
population."
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012
Message-ID:
<d6f2ba9a-8ee2-4e71-9f39-941d47ed7...@u9g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
From: Jay Herblock <jayherbl...@gmail.com>
Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you encourage them to
continue lying.
> On Nov 10, 9:38 am, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
>> On 11/10/2012 09:10 AM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
>>> On Nov 10, 8:49 am, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
>>> > It would be a better use of time and resources for conservatives
>>> > to concentrate on creating a truly conservative political party
>>> > with national credibility.
>>> It will go like this:
>>> - "Let's start a truly conservative party!!!"
>>> - A large percentage of conservative America: "Yeah!! Where do I send
>>> my contributions???"
>>> - "Ehem, there is one caveat, though: This time, bigotry will not be
>>> tolerated..."
>>> - crickets...
>>> - "Hello? Where is everybody?" (*)
>>> Don't believe me, David. You thing I am imagining things? Want some
>>> evidence?
>>> Ladies and and Gentlemen of the Jury, Your Honor, if it please the
>>> Court I present:
>>> THE TEA PARTY.
>>> Q.E.D.
>>> "Past is prologue" -S. Palin
>>> -Ramon
>>> (*) More seriously: If you take any substantial action trying to
>>> repress the DNA-ingrained tendencies of such group who naturally
>>> gravitates around the GOP, your new spanking shiny party will be Epic
>>> ==> FAIL. The only political factors who are trying to find a way
>>> around this existential conundrum are Jeb Bush and Lindsay Graham.
>>> GOP, don't alienate Latino voters - Frog - Scorpion - It is in my
>>> nature
> On Nov 10, 2:37 pm, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
>> On 11/10/2012 12:24 PM, wy wrote:
>>> On Nov 10, 12:16 pm, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
>>>> On 11/10/2012 10:17 AM, wy wrote:
>>>>> On Nov 10, 10:51 am, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/10/2012 09:42 AM, wy wrote:
>>>>>>> On Nov 10, 10:37 am, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2012 09:13 AM, wy wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Nov 10, 9:49 am, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2012 07:37 AM, ColdWarDinosaur wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> They are doubling down and will be going for impeachment instead. Just
>>>>>>>>>>> like the good old days. They are going to try to stop Obama by making
>>>>>>>>>>> the conversation ONLY about Benghazi. Not jobs, not the economy, not
>>>>>>>>>>> anything meaningful for the public that kicked them in the nuts, only
>>>>>>>>>>> Benghazi. Thats it, the sole topic of conversation (unless some of
>>>>>>>>>>> them become infected by sanity).
>>>>>>>>>>> This could be a Congressional version of Pickett's Charge...
>>>>>>>>>> If Obama did indeed lie about, and try to cover up what happened at
>>>>>>>>>> Behghazi, then he derserves to be impeached. As a practical matter, such
>>>>>>>>>> an impeachment is a wast of time with the current makeup of the Senate.
>>>>>>>>>> The Democrat majority will refuse to convict, and they will be aided by
>>>>>>>>>> the same spineless Republicans who refused to convict Clinton.
>>>>>>>>>> It would be a better use of time and resources for conservatives to
>>>>>>>>>> concentrate on creating a truly conservative political party with
>>>>>>>>>> national credibility.
>>>>>>>>> The problem with that is that they'd have to broaden their views
>>>>>>>>> beyond that embraced in the confederate states, where Romney got the
>>>>>>>>> bulk of his votes, at least two-thirds just from half the states he
>>>>>>>>> won. It's 3/4 if you include Florida as a win for him. The rest of
>>>>>>>>> the country doesn't think like the confederate states and that's why
>>>>>>>>> especially from this point forward Repugnants are going to have one
>>>>>>>>> hell of a time in reclaiming the White House again - because they live
>>>>>>>>> by their own conservatism which, by definition, means they're
>>>>>>>>> resistant to change.
>>>>>>>> You do realize that the civil war ended 150 years ago?
>>>>>>> Not for a lot of those in the South, as proven by the majority of
>>>>>>> votes Romney got from them. Otherwise, his votes would've been more
>>>>>>> evenly spread across the country in terms of percentages if there was
>>>>>>> something really in common between southern right wingnuts and the
>>>>>>> rest of the country's right wingnuts.
>>>>>> Have you seen a county by county breakdown of the election?
>>>>> 2/3 of the total national votes came from just 11 confederate states.
>>>>> 3/4 if you factor in Florida.
>>>> Which means nothing. The Confederacy ceased to exist 150 years ago.
>>> It's still in the DNA of southerners. Otherwise, they wouldn't have
>>> given Romney 2/3 (3/4 with Florida) of the Repugnant votes he got.
>> Really?
>> Show cause and effect.
> The volume of the votes prove it. Just think about it. Only a
> quarter to a third voted for Romney in the rest of the country, while
> the majority of his votes came from just all 11 (12 with Florida)
> confederate states. How many states in the US? 50? And Romney got
> approximately 70% of his votes concentrated in just 1/5th of the
> states? If that doesn't scream Southern right wingnut regionalism,
> well, then you tell me what does.
The fact that Romney won significant votes in the south, does not prove racism.
>>> If Obama did indeed lie about, and try to cover up what happened at
>>> Behghazi, then he derserves to be impeached.
>> Gee, 4 Americans dead in Benghazi compared to George Bush's lying and
>> covering up about Iraq's WMDs, which cost 4,486 American deaths
>> beginning in 2003 and untold hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi
>> lives.
> Just the kind of disaster the Republicans need....an attempt to impeach
> Obama.
> Republicans will NEVER let it happen.
> They remember to cost to them of the Clinton impeachment.
> Hartung is an idiot
Sid, no matter how much Obama might deserve to be impeached(I am not yet convinced he does), it will not happen. Even if the Republican House votes to impeach, the Democrat Senate will not convict.
This is similar to the Clinton impeachment. In hindsight, the House did not do their homework. If they had, they would have realized that there was no support in the Senate to convict. Clinton richly deserved to be removed from office, but the impeachment and removal of a president is ultimately a political act, and the House politicians made a major mistake. Do not look for them to repeat that mistake.
On Nov 11, 2:59 am, Dennis M <denni...@dennism3.invalid> wrote:
> And several turds a.k.a. "Bob Milby Jr. of Jacksonville" show up in the
> punchbowl. Never fails when an intelligent conversation is going on.
--------------
Fresh from his victory as K00K of the Month for September, Bob Milby
Jr.aka Patriot Games aka Buster Norris aka 1000s of Sockpuppets has
again been nominated for a different alt.usenet.kooks Award for
October!
This is *your* chance to vote for him!
======================
* October 2012 Nomination for The Order of the Holey Sockpuppet *
(Vote yes or no):
Bob Milby Jr., aka Patriot Games [aka Buster Norris, aka
1000s of sockpuppets]
A special Kookternity comprised of those most prolific in the art of,
abiet thinly, disguising their net.presence behind whatever nose and
glasses they can concoct. A Kook Art that came into its own, and
received its name, from the work of the late purveyor to the cotton-
bound masses, Earl Curley.
----------------
----------------
For full voting information and Official Ballot, go to:
Let's all show Bob how we feel about him. VOTE NOW!
-----
-----
Please Note:
In select newsgroups this post will now be follow by an out-of-date,
cut-and-paste, SHRIEKING ranting and raving by Bob Milby Jr., aka
Patriot Games, aka Buster Norris, aka 1000s of Sockpuppets -- and the
winner of alt.usenet.kook's K00K of the Month Award for September
2012.
We hope to return you to more rational posting after this brief,
psychotic interuption.
------
------
In select newsgroups this post will now be follow by an out-of-date,
cut-and-paste, SHRIEKING ranting and raving by Bob Milby Jr., aka
Patriot Games, aka Buster Norris, aka 1000s of sockpuppets -- and the
winner of alt.usenet.kook's K00K of the Month Award for September
2012.
We hope to return you to more rational posting after this brief,
psychotic interuption.
------
------
> On 11/10/2012 02:48 PM, Sid9 wrote:
>> "Dennis M" <denni...@dennism3.invalid> wrote in...
>>> David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
>>>> If Obama did indeed lie about, and try to cover up what
>>>> happened at Behghazi, then he derserves to be impeached.
>>> Gee, 4 Americans dead in Benghazi compared to George Bush's lying and
>>> covering up about Iraq's WMDs, which cost 4,486 American deaths
>>> beginning in 2003 and untold hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi
>>> lives.
>> Just the kind of disaster the Republicans need....an attempt to
>> impeach Obama. Republicans will NEVER let it happen.
>> They remember to cost to them of the Clinton impeachment.
>> Hartung is an idiot
> Sid, no matter how much Obama might deserve to be impeached
Still 'couching' your remarks upon unproven premises, David?
> (I am not yet convinced he does),
Hedging your bet, again?
> it will not happen. Even if the Republican House
Let's clear something else up here..
The United States House of Representatives isn't "absolutely"
a "Republican House". It was intended to 'represent' the
American people, not just "republicans"..
> votes to impeach, the Democrat Senate will not convict.
You're almost sounding rational now, and then ruin it with..
> This is similar to the Clinton impeachment.
Nope, that would be another of your 'false absolutes', in
that there is no sexual dalliance, nor is it even comparable
to the events in Benghazi, which your right-wing 'echo chamber'
seems to consistently misspell as "behghazi"..
> In hindsight, the House did not do their homework. If they had,
> they would have realized that there was no support in the Senate
> to convict.
I see that the 'frightie-righties' are trying to 'google-bomb'
this 'meme' into some sort of plausible hypothesis, never
mind how convenient this 'scandal' might be considering how
the 'film' which allegedly set off the chain of events wound
up getting the 'film-maker' put in jail..
> Clinton richly deserved to be removed from office
For what? Getting a blow-job from a cute intern?
--After exhausting everything else about Whitewater..
> On 11/11/2012 6:25 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 11/10/2012 02:48 PM, Sid9 wrote:
>>> "Dennis M" <denni...@dennism3.invalid> wrote in...
>>>> David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
>>>>> If Obama did indeed lie about, and try to cover up what
>>>>> happened at Behghazi, then he derserves to be impeached.
>>>> Gee, 4 Americans dead in Benghazi compared to George Bush's lying and
>>>> covering up about Iraq's WMDs, which cost 4,486 American deaths
>>>> beginning in 2003 and untold hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi
>>>> lives.
>>> Just the kind of disaster the Republicans need....an attempt to
>>> impeach Obama. Republicans will NEVER let it happen.
>>> They remember to cost to them of the Clinton impeachment.
>>> Hartung is an idiot
>> Sid, no matter how much Obama might deserve to be impeached
> Still 'couching' your remarks upon unproven premises, David?
>> (I am not yet convinced he does),
> Hedging your bet, again?
>> it will not happen. Even if the Republican House
> Let's clear something else up here..
> The United States House of Representatives isn't "absolutely"
> a "Republican House". It was intended to 'represent' the
> American people, not just "republicans"..
>> votes to impeach, the Democrat Senate will not convict.
> You're almost sounding rational now, and then ruin it with..
>> This is similar to the Clinton impeachment.
> Nope, that would be another of your 'false absolutes', in
> that there is no sexual dalliance, nor is it even comparable
> to the events in Benghazi, which your right-wing 'echo chamber'
> seems to consistently misspell as "behghazi"..
>> In hindsight, the House did not do their homework. If they had,
>> they would have realized that there was no support in the Senate
>> to convict.
> I see that the 'frightie-righties' are trying to 'google-bomb'
> this 'meme' into some sort of plausible hypothesis, never
> mind how convenient this 'scandal' might be considering how
> the 'film' which allegedly set off the chain of events wound
> up getting the 'film-maker' put in jail..
>> Clinton richly deserved to be removed from office
> For what? Getting a blow-job from a cute intern?
> --After exhausting everything else about Whitewater..
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 06:15:59 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
> On 11/10/2012 02:22 PM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
< snip >
>> > Your own bigotry is showing.
>> Being against political IDEAS is not bigotry.
> Unless of course it is a conservative who is against liberal ideas,
> right?
You hit on the fact that liberals can read minds, and conservatives cannot. When a conservative says something, it doesn't matter if it is true or not, the liberal can read his mind and determine that his motivation for saying it is racist.
If you say "Gee, I don't like that Obama says he can assassinate anyone he wants, including Americans, without a trial" then the liberal can read his mind and determine that the conservative is NOT concerned about freedom, rule of law or the fairness of it; but is just saying it because he's a racist and doesn't like Obama because he has black skin. Liberals know that conservatives are just as shallow and stupid as they themselves are; that they would judge people by their skin color and that principles like justice never have anything to do with it.
Don't think so? Just look what the "liberals" say about black Republicans and how they tolerate other liberals who say the most slanderous and bigoted things.
On Nov 11, 6:16 am, David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
[Ramon:]
>> Being against political IDEAS is not bigotry.
>
> Unless of course it is a conservative who is against liberal ideas,
right?
Nope. Still no bigotry.
David: Please clarify... Exactly, what are you trying to tell me?
(a) There is no racism.
(b) There is, but the OTHER party is the one that is racist.
(c) There is, but BOTH parties are equally racists.
Are you aware how insulting *ANY* of the 3 statements is?
Are you attempting to tell me who is the party that is holding the
shotgun pointing at me?
Frankly, I do not understand how a decent fellow like you can stand
the stench that surrounds you. Then again, I do profess respect and
admiration for Colin Powell and Jeb Bush...
Newsgroups: alt.atheism, alt.politics, sci.physics
From: BroilJAB <DesignDen...@wmconnect.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:11:46 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 10 2012 10:11 pm
Subject: Darwin: Blacks Are Soul Less Apes
The modern negro has an arrested intelligence
on par with a primitive pre-ape. He has a micro
brain and is usually very lazy. The negro is ever
sexualized and known to try and copulate with
white women, cattle, white boys, even zebra's.
An excess of animal hormones, combined with
an IQ that is 3 Standard Deviations below human."
-- Darwin 'On the Negro Stunted Evolution'.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Nov 11, 8:43 am, Marvin the Martian <mar...@ontomars.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 06:15:59 -0600, David Hartung wrote:
> > On 11/10/2012 02:22 PM, Ramon F. Herrera wrote:
> < snip >
> >> > Your own bigotry is showing.
> >> Being against political IDEAS is not bigotry.
> > Unless of course it is a conservative who is against liberal ideas,
> > right?
> You hit on the fact that liberals can read minds, and
> conservatives cannot. When a conservative says something,
> it doesn't matter if it is true or not, the liberal can
> read his mind and determine that his
> motivation for saying it is racist.
You obviated a factor: context.
Some of us take the trouble to check in the archives and see how a
post reinforces previous behavior and ideas. We should try to avoid
evaluating a post by itself.
Man of Mind wrote:
> On 11/11/2012 6:25 AM, David Hartung wrote:
>> On 11/10/2012 02:48 PM, Sid9 wrote:
>>> "Dennis M" <denni...@dennism3.invalid> wrote in...
>>>> David Hartung <david@h0tm*il.com> wrote:
>>>>> If Obama did indeed lie about, and try to cover up what
>>>>> happened at Behghazi, then he derserves to be impeached.
>>>> Gee, 4 Americans dead in Benghazi compared to George Bush's lying and
>>>> covering up about Iraq's WMDs, which cost 4,486 American deaths
>>>> beginning in 2003 and untold hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi
>>>> lives.
>>> Just the kind of disaster the Republicans need....an attempt to
>>> impeach Obama. Republicans will NEVER let it happen.
>>> They remember to cost to them of the Clinton impeachment.
>>> Hartung is an idiot
>> Sid, no matter how much Obama might deserve to be impeached
> Still 'couching' your remarks upon unproven premises, David?
>> (I am not yet convinced he does),
> Hedging your bet, again?
>> it will not happen. Even if the Republican House
> Let's clear something else up here..
> The United States House of Representatives isn't "absolutely"
> a "Republican House". It was intended to 'represent' the
> American people, not just "republicans"..
>> votes to impeach, the Democrat Senate will not convict.
> You're almost sounding rational now, and then ruin it with..
>> This is similar to the Clinton impeachment.
> Nope, that would be another of your 'false absolutes', in
> that there is no sexual dalliance, nor is it even comparable
> to the events in Benghazi, which your right-wing 'echo chamber'
> seems to consistently misspell as "behghazi"..
>> In hindsight, the House did not do their homework. If they had,
>> they would have realized that there was no support in the Senate
>> to convict.
> I see that the 'frightie-righties' are trying to 'google-bomb'
> this 'meme' into some sort of plausible hypothesis, never
> mind how convenient this 'scandal' might be considering how
> the 'film' which allegedly set off the chain of events wound
> up getting the 'film-maker' put in jail..
>> Clinton richly deserved to be removed from office
