> > Try not to spree . . .
> Are the attacks on US embassies affecting those numbers?
Romney's BushCo era response to them sent Obama up even more than the
GOP Convention!
You'd think that Mittens would have gotten a clue on neoconism's
standing with the Tea Party after the GOP establishment barred the
toxic W. Bush from the convention but Willard is so out of touch he
cannot even take a hint from his own party!
The whole point of Ryan was to garner the Teabagger vote even at the
expense of losing Florida.
On Sep 16, 10:49 am, Desertphile <Desertph...@spammegmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Sep 2012 09:53:29 -0400, Wally W. <ww8...@aim.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 23:25:46 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill wrote:
> > >Try not to spree . . .
> > Liberals throwing money at the irrelevant.
> "Liberals ?" What the fuck? Conservatives are the ones voting for
>Obama.
I've heard or read somewhere that the only people voting for Romney
are those who have or think they will soon have so much extra income
that they will never plausibly need it. (go figure)
<BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
> > > Try not to spree . . .
> > Are the attacks on US embassies affecting those numbers?
> Romney's BushCo era response to them sent Obama up even more than the
> GOP Convention!
> You'd think that Mittens would have gotten a clue on neoconism's
> standing with the Tea Party after the GOP establishment barred the
> toxic W. Bush from the convention but Willard is so out of touch he
> cannot even take a hint from his own party!
> The whole point of Ryan was to garner the Teabagger vote even at the
> expense of losing Florida.
> So again, who is Mitt's target audience?
Did you see the evil smirk on Mitt Rmoney's face when he lied to a
press conference about Obama apologizing to murderers? He used dead
people to campaign: fucking monster.
-- "What we have to be concerned about is whether or not the world we
live in will be capable of sustaining us in it." -- Douglas Adams
On Sep 16, 8:52 am, Wally W. <ww8...@aim.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 23:25:46 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill wrote:
> >Try not to spree . . .
> Liberals throwing money at the irrelevant.
> Never happened before. / sarc
> How much did *you* pay to "vote" on Intrade?
the republican party is simply running out of al bundy, homer
simpson, archie bunker types. people so stupid, they cannot even do
basic math, let alone come in from the rain.
the constitution of the united states was a anti-conservative
statement by the majority of the founders of the united states of
america.
but upon careful examination "THE CONSERVATIVES" feeble attempts at
confusion and dishonesty does not stand up to the light. they live in
a counter-factual universe, the product of the hermetically sealed
"CONSERVATIVE" subculture. Trying to see the world through the lens
of
"THE CONSERVATIVE", is like looking at a fun-house mirror;
everything’s backwards and distorted.
"THE CONSERVATIVES" world view is flawed because its based upon a
small and particularly rosy sliver of reality. To preserve that world
view, "THE CONSERVATIVES" believe that people had morally earned their
“just” desserts, and had to ignore those whining liberals who tried to
point out that the world didn’t actually work that way. I think this
shows why "THE CONSERVATIVES" put so much effort into “creat[ing]
their own reality,” into fostering distrust of liberals, experts,
scientists, and academics, and why they won’t let a campaign “be
dictated by fact-checkers” (as a Romney pollster put it). It explains
why study after study shows that avid consumers of "THE CONSERVATIVE"-
oriented media are more poorly informed than people who use other news
sources or don’t bother to follow the news at all.
<video61%tcq....@gtempaccount.com> wrote:
> On Sep 16, 8:52 am, Wally W. <ww8...@aim.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 23:25:46 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill wrote:
> > >Try not to spree . . .
> > Liberals throwing money at the irrelevant.
> > Never happened before. / sarc
> > How much did *you* pay to "vote" on Intrade?
> the republican party is simply running out of
> al bundy, homer simpson, archie bunker types. people so
> stupid, they cannot even do basic math, let alone
> come in from the rain.
“The demographics race we’re losing badly,” said Sen. Lindsey O.
Graham (SC). “We’re not generating enough angry white guys to stay in
business for the long term.”
"With Latinos forming the fastest-growing electoral bloc in the
nation, Armey says the GOP seems to be saying, “Let’s go out and
alienate them.” Armey said socially conservative Latino and African
American voters are natural constituents for the GOP ... if
Republicans don’t push them away. “The party was born with the
Emancipation Proclamation,” he said. But today, he added, “it can’t
get a black [or Hispanic] vote to save its life.” (**)
(**) I am sure you folks wonder what happened after Mr. Armey made
those sensible statements. The likes of Michelle Bachmann and Glenn
Beck told him to shut the fuck up, and he obliged: the angry bagger
mobs drowned his calls for rationality.
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 05:13:22 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill
<Bret_E_Cah...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Until we hear ferocious denunciations of FDR, JFK, Kerry, Edwards and
>> Corzine,
>GOP tax cuts for the rich hadn't bankrupted the country back then.
LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!
EGTRRA generally reduced the rates of individual income taxes:
- a new 10% bracket was created for single filers with taxable income
up to $6,000, joint filers up to $12,000, and heads of households up
to $10,000.
- the 15% bracket's lower threshold was indexed to the new 10% bracket
- the 28% bracket would be lowered to 25% by 2006.
- the 31% bracket would be lowered to 28% by 2006
- the 36% bracket would be lowered to 33% by 2006
- the 39.6% bracket would be lowered to 35% by 2006
The EGTRRA in many cases lowered the taxes on married couples filing
jointly by increasing the standard deduction for joint filers to
between 174% and 200% of the deduction for single filers.
Additionally, EGTRRA increased the per-child tax credit and the amount
eligible for credit spent on dependent child care, phased out limits
on itemized deductions and personal exemptions for higher income
taxpayers, and increased the exemption for the Alternative Minimum
Tax, and created a new depreciation deduction for qualified property
owners.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_Growth_and_Tax_Relief_Reconcili...
Ramon is a foreign transplant originally from Venezuela, probably a
beaner terrorist, and definitely a Fraud. Ramon F Herrera also goes by
"Cambridge Ray," "Google Poster," "Lucius Sanctimonious," and
"Hadron." An ultra-left, open-borders pretend-American. He lives and
works in Houston, TX. Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you
encourage them to continue lying.
Ramon F Herrera
13313 Cutten Rd, Apt 7102
Houston, TX 77069-2374
On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 01:49:24 -0800 (PST), Ramon F Herrera
<ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>How many times did Ronald Reagan go to church during his presidential
>term?
>Zero.
Oops! Caught LYING, again:
"...Reagan attended church only once in his eight years of
presidency."
"Two months after his Inauguration, President Reagan was shot and the
bullet came within an inch of his heart."
"When asked about his lack of church attendance during the 1984
presidential debate with former Vice President Walter Mondale, Reagan
said he feared endangering his own life and those of others: "I pose a
threat to several hundred people if I got to church. I know all the
threats that are made against me."
http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/modules/news/article.php?storyid=908
Ramon is a foreign transplant originally from Venezuela, probably a
beaner terrorist, and definitely a Fraud. Ramon F Herrera also goes by
"Cambridge Ray," "Google Poster," "Lucius Sanctimonious," and
"Hadron." An ultra-left, open-borders pretend-American. He lives and
works in Houston, TX. Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you
encourage them to continue lying.
Ramon F Herrera
13313 Cutten Rd, Apt 7102
Houston, TX 77069-2374
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 06:31:15 -0800 (PST), Ramon F Herrera
<ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>On Mar 4, 7:59 am, Phil <clayno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Back in November 2008 white Americans supported him
> > enthusiastically in his successful presidential campaign.
>Not true.
LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nearly all (95%) black voters cast their ballot for Democrat Barack
Obama. Among Latino voters, 67% voted for Obama while 31% voted for
Republican John McCain. Among Asian voters, 62% supported Obama and
35% voted for McCain. In contrast, white voters supported McCain (55%)
over Obama (43%).
http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1209/racial-ethnic-voters-presidential-el...
Ramon is a foreign transplant originally from Venezuela, probably a
beaner terrorist, and definitely a Fraud. Ramon F Herrera also goes by
"Cambridge Ray," "Google Poster," "Lucius Sanctimonious," and
"Hadron." An ultra-left, open-borders pretend-American. He lives and
works in Houston, TX. Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you
encourage them to continue lying.
Ramon F Herrera
13313 Cutten Rd, Apt 7102
Houston, TX 77069-2374
Ramon is a foreign transplant originally from Venezuela, probably a
beaner terrorist, and definitely a Fraud. Ramon F Herrera also goes by
"Cambridge Ray," "Google Poster," "Lucius Sanctimonious," and
"Hadron." An ultra-left, open-borders pretend-American. He lives and
works in Houston, TX. Note that when you reply to a Proven Liar you
encourage them to continue lying.
Ramon F Herrera
13313 Cutten Rd, Apt 7102
Houston, TX 77069-2374
What do you think of starting a new tradition in political
conventions:
Each party could invite a former president from the _other_ party to
speak at their convention.
If the former president refuses -- fine. Everyone will know that he
was never bi partisan.
Even more, if the presidunce wasn't allowed to speak at his own
party's convention, then he'll get an opportunity to explain his sorry
self at the other party's convention.
And if he won't explain his sorry self anywhere then maybe a special
prosecutor needs to get him on the stand.
> <video61%tcq....@gtempaccount.com> wrote:
> > On Sep 16, 8:52 am, Wally W. <ww8...@aim.com> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 23:25:46 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill wrote:
> > > >Try not to spree . . .
> > > Liberals throwing money at the irrelevant.
> > > Never happened before. / sarc
> > > How much did *you* pay to "vote" on Intrade?
> > the republican party is simply running out of
> > al bundy, homer simpson, archie bunker types. people so
> > stupid, they cannot even do basic math, let alone
> > come in from the rain.
> “The demographics race we’re losing badly,” said Sen. Lindsey O.
> Graham (SC). “We’re not generating enough angry white guys to stay in
> business for the long term.”
> "With Latinos forming the fastest-growing electoral bloc in the
> nation, Armey says the GOP seems to be saying, “Let’s go out and
> alienate them.” Armey said socially conservative Latino and African
> American voters are natural constituents for the GOP ... if
> Republicans don’t push them away. “The party was born with the
> Emancipation Proclamation,” he said. But today, he added, “it can’t
> get a black [or Hispanic] vote to save its life.” (**)
> Dick Armey, Founder and Funder of the Tea Party.
> (**) I am sure you folks wonder what happened after Mr. Armey made
> those sensible statements. The likes of Michelle Bachmann and Glenn
> Beck told him to shut the fuck up, and he obliged: the angry bagger
> mobs drowned his calls for rationality.
> -Ramon
when you are a high functioning clever, cunning, and manipulative
sociopath, full of hate and rage, its very hard to hide it.
> What do you think of starting a new tradition in political
> conventions :
> Each party could invite a former president from the _other_ party
to
>speak at their convention.
Well no Brett, because those actions might eventually result in a
threat to much needed national educational goals in the arts and
sciences. It may result in reduced environmental regulation, social
justice and tax revenue.
I favor only intra-party operations, with as few cross-aisle
negotiations as possible.
<video61%tcq....@gtempaccount.com> wrote:
> On Sep 16, 7:00 pm, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> > On Sep 16, 6:44 pm, Nickname unavailable
> > <video61%tcq....@gtempaccount.com> wrote:
> > > On Sep 16, 8:52 am, Wally W. <ww8...@aim.com> wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 23:25:46 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill wrote:
> > > > >Try not to spree . . .
> > > > Liberals throwing money at the irrelevant.
> > > > Never happened before. / sarc
> > > > How much did *you* pay to "vote" on Intrade?
> > > the republican party is simply running out of
> > > al bundy, homer simpson, archie bunker types. people so
> > > stupid, they cannot even do basic math, let alone
> > > come in from the rain.
> > “The demographics race we’re losing badly,” said Sen. Lindsey O.
> > Graham (SC). “We’re not generating enough angry white guys to stay in
> > business for the long term.”
> > "With Latinos forming the fastest-growing electoral bloc in the
> > nation, Armey says the GOP seems to be saying, “Let’s go out and
> > alienate them.” Armey said socially conservative Latino and African
> > American voters are natural constituents for the GOP ... if
> > Republicans don’t push them away. “The party was born with the
> > Emancipation Proclamation,” he said. But today, he added, “it can’t
> > get a black [or Hispanic] vote to save its life.” (**)
> > Dick Armey, Founder and Funder of the Tea Party.
> > (**) I am sure you folks wonder what happened after Mr. Armey made
> > those sensible statements. The likes of Michelle Bachmann and Glenn
> > Beck told him to shut the fuck up, and he obliged: the angry bagger
> > mobs drowned his calls for rationality.
> > -Ramon
> when you are a high functioning clever, cunning, and manipulative
> sociopath, full of hate and rage, its very hard to hide it.
Ramon gives you no such hint as to what emotional state he is in. He
merely quoted other peoples' talking-points.
