http://www.sacloaves.org/safeground/
Homeless people deserve a safe place to stay.
We believe everyone deserves SAFE GROUND!
There are over 1200 people sleeping outside every night in Sacramento
and the numbers are growing! Shelters are full, so for many the
options are few: sleep in a car, if you have one, or break the law and
sleep illegally on the streets.
This is unfair and unjust!
Everyone should have a safe place where they can go at night and sleep
without fear. That’s why we need a safe ground. Sacramento needs a
safe “legalized” campground where homeless folks can have clean water,
bathrooms, and trash services until our City, County and State are
willing and able to provide adequate shelters and affordable housing
for the growing numbers of homeless folks.
We need you to join us on April 21, Tuesday at 2pm on the Capital
Steps for the:
Safe Ground Rally
April 21, 2009, Tuesday, 2 pm
Sacramento State Capital
No, they don't. There is no such thing as "deserve a safe place to
stay." The deserve whatever they CHOSE to EARN.
>We believe everyone deserves SAFE GROUND!
Who cares what you believe? How many homeless are YOU sharing YOUR
home with?
Who the hell are you to be asking about numbers, Shit Eater?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/07437c14be260041
Care to explain how 36% is less than 1/3?
BAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Heh heh...
Insane lying racist rightard sheep fucking shit eating coprophiles...
Toofuckingeasy...
Get to pasting, Shit Eater.
How many time, and under how many different handles, have you spammed
this same crap?
You tried to place the blame on Nixon - YOU LIED.
You tried to suggest that Democrats funded the Iraq War because
Bush wouldn't withdraw troops if Democrats defunded the Iraq War using
the Democrat's defunding of Vietnam under Nixon.
Your argument FAILED.
When Democrats were funding Vietnam Johnson killed nearly TWICE AS
MANY, when Democrats defunded Vietnam Nixon began withdrawals and
drastically reduced the KIA count.
Your argument FAILED.
> How many time, and under how many different handles, have you spammed
> this same crap?
I guess he thinks we need to be scared, and it's his job to do it.
Nixon has the blame for more than 1/3 of the deaths in Vietnam.
Now...
Please explain how 36% is less than 1/3...
I know you're trying to obscure your fuck up with a big steaming pile
of rightard bullshit.
It isn't going to work.
> You tried to suggest that Democrats funded the Iraq War because
> Bush wouldn't withdraw troops if Democrats defunded the Iraq War using
> the Democrat's defunding of Vietnam under Nixon.
And I'm right.
Bush and his "Imperial President advisers would have left the troops
in place had Congress refused to fund the war.
Now...
Please explain how 36% is less than 1/3...
I know you're trying to obscure your fuck up with a big steaming pile
of rightard bullshit.
It isn't going to work.
> Your argument FAILED.
Now...
Please explain how 36% is less than 1/3...
I know you're trying to obscure your fuck up with a big steaming pile
of rightard bullshit.
It isn't going to work.
> When Democrats were funding Vietnam Johnson killed nearly TWICE AS
> MANY, when Democrats defunded Vietnam Nixon began withdrawals and
> drastically reduced the KIA count.
Now...
Please explain how 36% is less than 1/3...
I know you're trying to obscure your fuck up with a big steaming pile
of rightard bullshit.
It isn't going to work.
> Your argument FAILED.
Now...
Please explain how 36% is less than 1/3...
I know you're trying to obscure your fuck up with a big steaming pile
of rightard bullshit.
It isn't going to work.
BAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Heh heh...
Insane lying racist rightard closet queer sheep fucking shit eating
Who started the war and the escalation of troops in the first place?
You seem to forget (or maybe you weren't around then) that when the
anti-war movement got in full gear, it wasn't Nixon who they were
protesting - it was LBJ. :O|
Sure do, but why should I repost the same rebuttal every time this
clown posts the same damn thing? Unlike him, I don't believe in
spamming.
>> Nixon has the blame for more than 1/3 of the deaths in Vietnam.
> Who started the war and the escalation of troops in the first
> place? You seem to forget (or maybe you weren't around then) that
> when the anti-war movement got in full gear, it wasn't Nixon who
> they were protesting - it was LBJ. :O|
"Hey hey LBJ! How many kids did you kill today!" (Repeat
394820348320984 times)
Johnson did.
I've not denied that.
But, you'll notice that liberals pulled their support from Johnson,
which is why he didn't seek another term as president.
Democrats elected a foreign policy fuck-up, and tried to clean up the
mess as soon as the next election rolled around.
What did Repubicans do?
Elected Nixon, who kept the mess going for another four years.
Okay, I've thought again. I've come to the same conclusion. Forgive me
for my smugness. I didn't buy more house than I could afford. I took
an eight year mortgage and paid it off in seven years.
> http://www.sacloaves.org/safeground/
>
> Homeless people deserve a safe place to stay.
>
> We believe everyone deserves SAFE GROUND!
So you believe that there is another "right" which is not a right.
> There are over 1200 people sleeping outside every night in Sacramento
> and the numbers are growing! Shelters are full, so for many the
> options are few: sleep in a car, if you have one, or break the law and
> sleep illegally on the streets.
>
> This is unfair and unjust!
It might be unfair. There's no telling if it is unjust. Life isn't
always fair or just. Most of us have learned to deal with those things.
Dave Heil
Caught LYING, again.
(When Democrats can't LIE they try to rewrite history...)
"He ran about even with Republican George Romney in trial matchups
that spring."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyndon_B._Johnson#Presidency_1963.E2.80.931969
Yes, Johnson DID "seek another term as president" but got his ass
handed to him.
Only THEN did he QUIT.
http://video.aol.com/video-detail/history-uncut-resignation-of-lyndon-johnson-1968/1263658343
Splitting the hairs pretty fine there, Shit Eater.
Last refuge of a rightard...
>
> (When Democrats can't LIE they try to rewrite history...)
>
> "He ran about even with Republican George Romney in trial matchups
> that spring."http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyndon_B._Johnson#Presidency_1963.E2.80....
>
> Yes, Johnson DID "seek another term as president" but got his ass
> handed to him.
Because liberals refused to support him, just as I said.
> Only THEN did he QUIT.
Yea...
Like I said...
Johnson DIDN'T seek re-election, Queer boy.
>
> http://video.aol.com/video-detail/history-uncut-resignation-of-lyndon...
But, back to the point...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/07437c14be260041
You wrote:
"Vietnam Total: 58,193
Johnson: 62%
Nixon: 36%
You said: "more than a third of the troops killed in Vietnam happened
under Nixon's watch."
YOU LIED."
BAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....
36% is more than 1/3.
You're a fucking MORON, Shit Eater.
All the rest of your post is a failed effort to DISTRACT FROM YOUR
STUPIDITY.
Tell me how 36% is less than 1/3...
BAWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Heh heh...
Insane lying racist rightard closet queer sheep fucking coprophile
shit eaters...
See above...
You can fuck off now...
I did.
You're full of shit, as usual, queer boy.
>
> You can fuck off now...
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/07437c14be260041