The 14-year-old CPAC star
Kickin' Ass & Takin' Names
last week was the appearance of some 14-year-old kid who is supposed
to be the darling of the right. I didn't catch his name because I'm
not in the habit of paying a lot of attention to 14-year-old kids.
The kid was interviewed on CNN this morning -- what a fucking joke!!
It's obvious that the kid has a good mind, smart, well-spoken -- but
-- his "knowledge" consists of memorized Ronnie Raygun platitudes --
about five seconds into the interview he pronounced that "government
is the problem" -- and the rest was vintage Reagan.
As the interview concluded, we were told that the kid has been home-
schooled all his life. Well, that explains it -- no doubt his
parents worship at the feet of Saint Ronnie and they have fed the kid
a steady diet of Reagan platitudes -- he has never interacted with
anyone who has a different idea -- and he's not likely to do so --
expect him to attend one of these obscure "christian" colleges --
Liberty U., Patrick Henry College -- where his narrow views will be
reinforced.
Just like the rest of the Republicons -- can't function unless someone
in authority is telling him what and how to think and exactly what to
say.
serebel
For Better Or Worse
<PopUlist...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Just like the rest of the Republicons -- can't function unless someone
> in authority is telling him what and how to think and exactly what to
> say.
How's the ammunition manufacturing business, K. Ass? How many more
THOUSANDS of rounds of ammo have you squirreled away for, uh, you
know....the RIGHT TIME?
Kickin' Ass & Takin' Names
I don't manufacture ammo.
I load my own.
There's a difference.
Not that you're smart enough to understand.
Kickin' Ass & Takin' Names
> Now you're afraid of a 14yr old kid? How pathetic.
Afraid, hell -- I'm laughing my ass off at you nutcases who are
falling all over yourselves to kiss his ass and anoint him as your
great hope.
JaxKayaker
wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 18:41:36 -0800 (PST), serebel <sere...@aol.com> wrote:
> >Now you're afraid of a 14yr old kid? How pathetic.
>
> *following* a 14 year old kid.
Nah! Nobody is following the kid
but
Pathetic is an asshole who lets a 14 year old kid get to him
What a fuckin' loser!
Dave Heil
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 18:41:36 -0800 (PST), serebel <ser...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> Now you're afraid of a 14yr old kid? How pathetic.
>
> *following* a 14 year old kid.
Please feel free to document that anyone is following a 14-year-old kid.
Any confirmation from a reliable source will do.
Dave Heil
Dave Heil
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 19:14:34 -0800 (PST), JaxKayaker <prh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mar 3, 10:08 pm, Peter Perfect <petesfe...@gSNIPTHISPARTmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 18:41:36 -0800 (PST), serebel <sere...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>> Now you're afraid of a 14yr old kid? How pathetic.
>>> Er, don't look now, but, speaking of pathetic, luser, you idiots are
>>> *following* a 14 year old kid.
>> Nah! Nobody is following the kid
>
I know of no group called "conservadolts".
> You'd
> better get busy letting them know, as they are obviously laboring under a
> rather severe misunderstanding...
Let's just cut to the chase and let you know here and now, that you're
laboring under a severe misunderstanding. See? That tidies everything
up in a neat little bundle.
Dave Heil
Dave Heil
>
> Why, gosh, yes, Dip Thunker, how silly it is to think him a leader when
> there's only FOUR HUNDRED AND EIGHTY-TWO THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED AND
> FORTY-NINE blog posts about the kid SPEAKING AT A LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE...
>
> http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&num=100&c2coff=1&safe=off&ie=UTF-8&q=cpac+14+OR+%22Jonathan+OR+Krohn%22+OR+fourteen&btnG=Search+Blogs
>
> ...and another ONE MILLION ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-THOUSAND Web references
> about the kid SPEAKING AT A LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE.
>
Concentrate now; I asked if you could document that anyone is following
him. I didn't ask whether you document that he spoke at CPAC.
Give it another try now, won't you?
Dave Heil
Dave Heil
> On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:47:07 +0000, Dave Heil <k8...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>
>> Peter Perfect wrote:
>>> On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:59:56 +0000, Dave Heil <k8...@frontiernet.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Peter Perfect wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 18:41:36 -0800 (PST), serebel <ser...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Now you're afraid of a 14yr old kid? How pathetic.
>>>>> Er, don't look now, but, speaking of pathetic, luser, you idiots are
>>>>> *following* a 14 year old kid.
>>>> Please feel free to document that anyone is following a 14-year-old kid.
>>>> Any confirmation from a reliable source will do.
>>> Jaybus Freaking Crisco...
>>>
>>> Why, gosh, yes, Dip Thunker, how silly it is to think him a leader when
>>> there's only FOUR HUNDRED AND EIGHTY-TWO THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED AND
>>> FORTY-NINE blog posts about the kid SPEAKING AT A LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE...
>>>
>>> http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&num=100&c2coff=1&safe=off&ie=UTF-8&q=cpac+14+OR+%22Jonathan+OR+Krohn%22+OR+fourteen&btnG=Search+Blogs
>>>
>>> ...and another ONE MILLION ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-THOUSAND Web references
>>> about the kid SPEAKING AT A LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE.
>>>
>> Concentrate now;
>
>
>> I asked if you could document that anyone is following
>> him. I didn't ask whether you document that he spoke at CPAC.
>
> little Jonny's ass like a string of baby ducklings following big momma
> quacker?
>
> Um, no, foam duck. Not even close, foam duck...
>
>> Give it another try now, won't you?
>
> otherwise know, precisely how fucking STUPID must one be before one
> foolishly posits that MILLIONS UPON MILLIONS UPON MILLIONS of articles,
> references, commentary, etc. somehow does NOT constitute, wait for it, you
> stupid motherfucker...
>
> ... a FOLLOWING?
>
> Well?
>
> <tap, tap, tap>
>
> Witness, subliterate buffoon...
>
> ------
> http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/following?qsrc=2888
>
> fol-low-ing
>
> –noun
> 1. a body of followers, attendants, adherents, etc.
> 2. the body of admirers, attendants, patrons, etc., of someone or
> something: That television show has a large following.
> ------
>
> Lead, follow. Lead, follow. Lead, follow...
>
> Gosh, subliterate buffoon, it's almost as if they go together. Go figger,
> eh, Dip Thunker?
>
> <snort>
>
> FYI, one who has a FOLLOWING of MILLIONS is, indeed, and by any possible
> definition, you stupid motherfucker, a LEADER, which is very possibly why,
> you stupid motherfucker.
>
> Gee, maybe that's why he was tapped to speak at a LEADERSHIP conference. Ya
> think, Dip Thunker?
>
> Logic: It's not just for breakfast anymore.
>
> Duh fucking duh, duh, duh, you stupid motherfucker...
>
> Now, is all of this clear enough for you or shall we tattoo it backwards on
> your fat, stupid ass for easy future reference?
>
> Un-fucking-believable...
Yes, you are. You've had to resort to being vulgar. You've revealed
that you can't debate an issue and that you're stumped. You've offered
nothing to support your claim. You'll have to do better.
There is no indication that anyone, anywhere is following this
14-year-old kid.
Dave Heil
Dave Heil
>
> So, over there in Stupidassholestan, debating isn't debating and citing
> multiple independently verifiable authoritative references means one is
> "stumped," and, in your bat shit crazy conservadolt universe, these multiple
> independently verifiable authoritative resources are actually nothing?
Oh no, my foul-mouthed little pal, debating is debating. You aren't
doing that. You continue to call names and type vulgarities. You
haven't "verified" that any adults are followers of the 14-year-old who
spoke at the CPAC convention. What you have produced is actually nothing.
Well, except for the MILLIONS UPON MILLIONS OF HIS FOLLOWERS breathless
> hyping his every utterance, sure..
> http://blogsearch.google.com/blogsearch?hl=en&num=100&c2coff=1&safe=off&ie=UTF-8&q=cpac+14+OR+%22Jonathan+OR+Krohn%22+OR+fourteen&btnG=Search+Blogs
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=cpac+14+OR+%22Jonathan+OR+Krohn%22+OR+fourteen
>
> "But, other than that, how did you enjoy the play, Mrs. Lincoln?"
>
> You idiots are truly a fucking HOOT! You provide absolutely nothing
> whatsoever to back up your silly-ass bullshit, other than your stupid
> asshole uninformed, erroneous opinion, then turn around and flame someone
> for not providing anything, despite the FACT that said someone did, indeed,
> provide multiple definitive, authoritative and independently verifiable
> citations?
>
> BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA, whew!
>
> Dat dere is hee-fucking-larry-ass sheet, bubba. And all of this time I had
> assumed those were acne scars...
>
> But the real howler is you jeen-yess-uz STILL can't figure out why you've
> had your stupid asses handed to twice in a row with even worse prospects for
> the future.
You've handed nothing to no one. Only your fellow barbarians could call
your display a win.
If you attempted to act in face to face encounters the way you've acted
here, you'd be easily recognized by your lumpy countenance.
Dave Heil