Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

What the bible says about homosexuality

7 views
Skip to first unread message

Jope

unread,
May 10, 2012, 4:58:25 PM5/10/12
to
As homosexuality is gaining more acceptance,it is important for those
who believe in God to be mindful of his word.
For God will bring into judgement not only the ones who commit evil
deeds but also,those who approve of such deeds.

The following passages are from the word of God


" Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is
abomination."

Leviticus 18:22


"The wicked are sentenced to suffer just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the
adjacent towns--which likewise gave themselves over to impurity and
indulged in unnatural vice and sensual perversity--are laid out in
plain sight as an exhibit of perpetual punishment of everlasting
fire."

Jude 1:7


"For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even
their women did change the natural use into that which is against
nature."

Romans 1:26
" And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the
woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working
that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence
of
their error which was meet."

Romans 1:27

"And even as they did not like to retain God in their
knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things
which are not convenient."

Romans 1:28


" Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom
of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor
adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor
extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God."

1 Corinthians 6:9-10

" But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable,
and
murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all
liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and
brimstone: which is the second death."

Revelation 21:8

"For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them
down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be
reserved unto judgment
And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person,
a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of
the ungodly;
And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes
condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those
that after should live ungodly;
And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of
the wicked:
(For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and
hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful
deeds;)
The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations,
and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished"

2 Peter 2:4-9

" If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman,
both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put
to
death; their blood shall be upon them. "

Leviticus 20:13

"I warn you beforehand, just as I did previously, that those who do
such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God."

Galatians 5v21

Middle Class Warrior

unread,
May 10, 2012, 5:10:50 PM5/10/12
to
That was the view of the leaders of a samll group of Bronze Age savages. The Greeks had a completely different view.

The Greek culture with its emphasis on science and rationality was far more important to modern European culture than the rants of Israelite priests.

Misanthropic Curmudgeon

unread,
May 10, 2012, 5:59:36 PM5/10/12
to
On May 11, 8:58 am, Jope <jope...@gmail.com> wrote:
[snip]

> " Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is
> abomination." Leviticus 18:22

Leviticus also says that eating shellfish is an abomination. Aside
from the fact that I dont beleive in your god, its hard to take you
seriously when you are demonstrating such rank hypocrisy to campaign
against one abomination and not the many others listed ion the same
page of your bible.

Your bible even gets all pissy about women with short of uncovered
hair, men with long hair, ....



> "The wicked are sentenced to suffer just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the
> adjacent towns--which likewise gave themselves over to impurity and
> indulged in unnatural vice and sensual perversity--are laid out in
> plain sight as an exhibit of perpetual punishment  of everlasting
> fire." Jude 1:7

If you read your bible, you'd kow that there was a lot more going on
in SnG than a bit of man-love. To argue it was the man-love that your
god killed thousands of women and children for, is to argue that (1)
your god hates innocent children and (2) blaming one thing for an even
is like like blaming Hurricane Katrina on a lack of corn dogs at
Denny's.



>  "And even as they did not like to retain God in their
> knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things
> which are not convenient." Romans 1:28

That verse reads a lot like 'live and let live' to those who do no
harm. Maybe should consider doing what your bible says your god did?!


Rex B

unread,
May 10, 2012, 7:13:41 PM5/10/12
to
On Thursday, May 10, 2012 4:58:25 PM UTC-4, Jope wrote:
> As homosexuality is gaining more acceptance,it is important for those
> who believe in God to be mindful of his word.
> For God will bring into judgement not only the ones who commit evil
> deeds but also,those who approve of such deeds.

> The following passages are from the word of God


> " Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is
> abomination."

You really need to go back to the Torah, in the original Hebrew to understand this one. The word is not "lie" it's "Putsala" (sic?), word from which the Yiddish word Putz is derived. It referrs to the brutal rape, the kind that frequently occurs after a battle, after all of the men and most of the boys are dead - because the young boys are obligated to avenge their fathers. They would also kill all the mothers and older women. What was supposed to be left were the young single women, who would then be raped - spoils of war.

Deuteronomy, which was written later, suggests that men should shave the women bald, dress them in sack-cloth and ashes for a period, and THEN they can rape them, but they have to treat them like a wife (Concubine).

Before a battle, the mothers of young prepubescent boys would often dress the boys up as women, even putting on make-up and doing other things to make them look even more desirable than the natural women. This was the boy's only chance of not being killed the moment he was spotted.

Of course, the boy might be spared, but after the battle, when everybody else is dead, the soldiers would start raping the women and would eventually discover that "she" was a "he". At which point, the soldiers might very understandably rape the boy, the same way they would rape the women, and THEN they would kill him.

In Leviticus, it was considered inhumane to rape a 10-12 year old boy before you killed him. You should just kill him, since the women who were raped would be allowed to live.

> Leviticus 18:22

> "The wicked are sentenced to suffer just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the
> adjacent towns--which likewise gave themselves over to impurity and
> indulged in unnatural vice and sensual perversity--are laid out in
> plain sight as an exhibit of perpetual punishment of everlasting
> fire."

The word Sodomite had more to do with vicious and brutal rape. When the Angels came to visit Lot, the people of Sodom wanted to rape them. Lot offered to let them RAPE HIS OWN DAUGHTERS rather than let these visitors be harmed. The original Hebrew refers to them as messengers, who may have been male, female, or both.

> Jude 1:7

> "For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even
> their women did change the natural use into that which is against
> nature."

Not sure of the biblical reference on this one. I was not that unusual for Roman Women, especially the wives of Roman Senators, to have a Gladiator bound in such a way that she could forcefully rape him. She could insert something into him that would force an erection, then she could mount him, even as she humiliated and beat him. Similar things were done to household slaves.

Could this be what Jude was talking about?

> Romans 1:26
> " And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the
> woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working
> that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence
> of their error which was meet."

Again with the King Jimmy translations based on the Greek. Tiberious Ceasar would take young boys, pre-teens, and rape them in his swimming pool. If they resisted, he would throw the "Minnows" back into the sea - over a high cliff that always killed them. Caligula was one of Tiberious' "minnows" for most of his life until Tiberious died.

Perhaps this was the kind of behavior being referenced. Romans was written after the death of Caligula but before the death of Nero.


> Romans 1:28

> " Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom
> of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor
> adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
> Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor
> extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God."

Nero and his band were all of these things, but more importantly, they got great pleasure from raping women, boys, and even having the women and boys raped by animals, before they were killed by wild tigers, lions, or dogs.

If a father could not pay his taxes, the tax collector would take his daughter, or even his young son if he had no daughter, and "rent out" to the Roman Soldiers. The tax collector's job wasn't just to collect the cash to pay the Legion, he was also responsible for getting them the things they wanted to buy with that money, such as prostitutes, booze, and really good food.

The tax collector wasn't just a civil servant, he was also the pimp, the casino, the drug dealer, and the gangster.

> 1 Corinthians 6:9-10
> " But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and
> murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all
> liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and
> brimstone: which is the second death."

Again, some translation issues from the Greek. Fearful would have been more like "Terrorists" and "Unbelieving" would have been more like "Openly defiant to God and God's laws". Whoremongers would have been the people who took the daughters of people who couldn't pay their taxes, and forced the girls into prostitution - forcing them to service 30-40 Roman soldiers every night. If she fought - she would get raped and beaten even worse. The Roman Soldiers liked the "sport" of the kind of sex they would get after a battle - rough rape sex. And this was what the tax collectors were selling.

Sorcerers were were those who used "magic" (probably poisons and technology) to maim, wound, or kill people as a way to extort money from them. The closest we have to anything like it in modern times would be the "JuJu Man" who would wipe a past or mark containing a drug that would paralyse the victim, making them appear dead for several days. After they were buried, the JuJu man would dig them up, but by then, oxygen deprivation would turn their brains to mush, making them very obedient slaves. This is where the myth of Zombies came from. In Roman and Greek times, sorcerers would use Mandrake Root to create a bitter drink that had a similar effect. More often, the sorcerer would rape the people he dug up. There may have also been those sorcerers who performed a primitive form of Lobotomy using a spike and hammer - to create mindless slaves.

In the 1950s, this was a common medical practice. Rape a woman, like a step-daughter, numerous times. When she fought back, take her to the psych ward, where they would drive a spike into her frontal lobe, turning her into a docile puppet - who wouldn't fight back when she was raped.

> Revelation 21:8

> "For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them
> down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be
> reserved unto judgment
> And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person,
> a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of
> the ungodly;
> And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes
> condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those
> that after should live ungodly;
> And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of
> the wicked:
> (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and
> hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful
> deeds;)
> The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations,
> and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished"

> 2 Peter 2:4-9

Consider this in the context of Jesus teachings, and consider the possible fate of a country where money became more important than God, where Billionaires were worshiped and obeyed without question. They could get away with mass murder, and be unchallenged. Nazi Germany, 1950s United States, and today?

The United States was the inspiration for Nazi Germany. The "Trail of Tears" and the systematic extermination of the native tribes, including the Chiracaua, Navaho, Hopi, Zuni, and all of the other tribes, forcing them to a death march, putting the survivors in the middle of the desert with no food and ransid water, then giving them the blankets of those who had died of smallpox. The United States didn't use Zyclon B - the were much LESS humane.


> " If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman,
> both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put
> to death; their blood shall be upon them. "

> Leviticus 20:13

Again, we go back to the original context of a pre-teen boy, who survives the battle by looking and acting like a girl. If he survives, if he is allowed to live, it is his sacred duty to kill the men who kill his mother, father, brothers, baby sisters, and raped his 10-20 year old sisters and female cousins.

Yes, the boy might give you pleasure tonight, but if you fall asleep, he will look for a knife to slit your throat. If he dies in the attempt, he was going to die anyway and he knows it. He just bought himself enough time to take a few soldiers with him.

In Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan, boys are recruited at 10-12 years old, survivors of battles in which most of their own families have been killed, and they learn to kill as many soldiers as possible, as quickly as possible, with the knowledge that he really didn't have all that long to live anyway.

The United States has always fought a very unusual kind of war. Rather than shoot the foot soldiers, then rape and pillage, the Americans used snipers to take out as many of the commanding officers as possible. It was terrifying to the military commanders, because they were used to war in which they would march into the town, kill all the men and boys, and have their way with the women. The officers were never to be targeted, and should only be attacked by another officer. The knight meeting the knight.

In the USA, the pawn - the Kentucky rifleman who didn't even wear a uniform, and mostly wore animal hides, in leather and fur, were taking out Generals and commanders before the battle even started.

As a result, Americans never really experienced the horrors of barbaric war in a no holds barred everybody but the young women are to be killed on sight bloody ugly war.

By the time of the Revolution, even the Indians obeyed the rules of war, taking the ears or scalps of the dead, but allowing the injured to live, and allowing the defeated to withdraw or retreat.

> "I warn you beforehand, just as I did previously, that those who do
> such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God."

The sad thing is that these misinterpretations of scripture, the lacking context, and the bigotry of overzealous readers of a book which was written as a propaganda tool to assure the power of King James and his MALE lords and vassals, and to assure that there would not be another Queen Mary or Queen Elizabeth, have taken this interpretation as justification for the murder of innocent boys and men who are very careful to make sure that their partners are only consenting adults, whose "crime" is being too "feminine" or "sissy" - and for these crimes, at the guidance of their preachers - inflict injuries that disfigure, maim, cripple, or kill the victims, as acts preformed "In the Name Of Jesus".

Consider the plight of Saint Paul. Here is a man, in his 30s, a wealthy Rabbi, with family in the Sanhedrin, who is not married, seems to have no attraction to women, and spends most of his time with a bunch of men, and writes verses of love and admiration about a number of men he considered "friends".

In modern United States society, he might have been persecuted as a "queer", possibly even attacked, crippled, or even killed.

> Galatians 5v21

Even better, consider Jesus. A man whose father was a carpenter, whose mother was from a family of high priests, and who disowned his adoptive father at 12 years old to study in the temple. One group claims he was never married, which would have been very unusual for a Rabbi, especially a Rabbi who had lived to 30. And this unmarried Jesus spoke of a father's love, turning the other cheek, loving your enemies, and washed the feet of a bunch of men.

In 21st century USA, a guy like that might have been lynched. Especially if he was in the South, acting a bit too feminine, with long hair, and being all lovey dovey with a bunch of other men who hung out with him all the time. And of course, they camped out all the time, so they were homeless as well.

At minimum, he would have ended up on a chain gang, or in a psychiatric ward.

What would Jesus do?
Who would Jesus Bomb?

ilbe...@gmail.com

unread,
May 11, 2012, 3:45:04 PM5/11/12
to
On May 10, 4:59 pm, Misanthropic Curmudgeon
Everyone knows, even the homosexuals, that making love with another
mans feces / smearing feces on the body / eating feces / jamming
ones fist up anothers anus / urinating on anothers body / is
absoloutely wrong , perverted, unnatural, and very very dangerous
given the diseases which just these perversions incorporate . Why
suppress your God given moral conscience over such things , and,
why pretend that Nothing created our Universe from nothing by nothing
and for no ounce of purpose ? This sick charade game will only
devastate you in the end. Give God a chance with your life and never
be sorry.

Mark Evans

unread,
May 11, 2012, 5:08:38 PM5/11/12
to
> be sorry.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - , how about that founderof yur religon who never married, was devoted to his mother, was a wedding caterer and spent his adult life traveling with an all male group of "followers", on of which was noted for kissing him in public?

Mark Evans

Ramon F. Herrera

unread,
May 11, 2012, 6:18:44 PM5/11/12
to
On May 11, 2:45 pm, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Everyone knows, even the homosexuals, that making love with another
> mans feces / smearing feces on the body /  eating feces /  jamming
> ones fist up anothers anus /  urinating on anothers body /   is
> absoloutely wrong , perverted, unnatural, and very very dangerous
> given the diseases which just these perversions incorporate .    Why
> suppress your God given moral conscience over such things  , and,
> why  pretend that Nothing created our Universe from nothing by nothing
> and for no ounce of purpose ?   This sick charade game  will only
> devastate you in the end.   Give God a chance with your life and never
> be sorry.

How come women achieve climax through anal intercourse?

That was a gift God gave them. They would be ingrates if they did not
enjoy it.

-Ramon

Ken

unread,
May 11, 2012, 7:12:30 PM5/11/12
to
On May 11, 12:45 pm, "IlBenButtfucked @gmail.com"
<ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I got it in the end.

Did you have to suck on a dick that tasted like shit, Davie Boi?

DAVE was asked:: Do you have first-hand experience with alcohol?
illegal drugs?
prostitutes? homosexuality? or any other things that you consider to
be
sinful?'

DAVE'S REPLY: And what if it once did involve homosexuality many years
ago
when i was a godless heathen

Misanthropic Curmudgeon

unread,
May 13, 2012, 8:05:00 PM5/13/12
to
If you are goingto comment on a subject, its best to infomrm yourself
beforehand. Otherwise you just look like a fool, as you have done so
above.

JLS

unread,
May 13, 2012, 9:52:24 PM5/13/12
to
Who GAS! The bible has no credibility whatsoever with people who can
read and write and are not afflicted with hysteria and superstitions.

As Mark Twain said, it has some beautiful poetry, a wealth of
obscenity, some great stories, wonderful erotica for pubescent boys
and girls, rivers of blood, a quotable parable or two, a talking ass,
UFO's, sticks that turn into spitting cobras, shocking battles and
warfare, an angry wrathful god who is crazy as a shithouse rat, and
upwards of a thousand lies.

harry k

unread,
May 14, 2012, 2:19:44 AM5/14/12
to
On May 11, 12:45 pm, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com>
wrote:
You seem to be very familiar with the subject. Expertise speaking?

Harry K

Joseph R Loegering

unread,
May 14, 2012, 3:13:48 AM5/14/12
to
On Thursday, May 10, 2012 4:59:36 PM UTC-5, Misanthropic Curmudgeon wrote:
> On May 11, 8:58 am, Jope <jope...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > " Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is
> > abomination." Leviticus 18:22
>
> Leviticus also says that eating shellfish is an abomination. Aside
> from the fact that I dont beleive in your god, its hard to take you
> seriously when you are demonstrating such rank hypocrisy to campaign
> against one abomination and not the many others listed ion the same
> page of your bible.

Not only is my diet Kosher, but if not breaking the Law of Moses is to be Jewish, then as a blood descendant of Israel, I am more Jewish than most Jews. Not only are all the things that the scriptures call an abomination, an abomination to me, but both those that promote marriage as one man, one woman, and those that promote gay marriage, are an abomination not only to me, but to Yahweh the God of Abraham.

Gay Pride vs the Pride of them that promote what they claim is traditional marriage, to outlaw Abraham and Jacob and Elkanah and David and Solomon and any that follow their examples, outlawing all that Yahweh sanctified.

“He that is of a proud heart stirs up strife, but he that puts his trust in Yahweh shall be made fat.”
Proverbs 28:25

O Yahweh, they say either legalize Gay Marriage which is an abomination unto you, and or they say to choose their traditional Marriage as one man and one woman to outlaw the traditional relationships of Abraham and Jacob and Elkanah and David and Solomon and their women and their children whom you sanctified. And O Yahweh, they are proud that they outlawed the traditional relationships of Abraham and Jacob and Elkanah and David and Solomon that you sanctified, sanctifying them both when not under your law and when under your law. From their own mouths they boast of their own pride, as they lay traps for the righteous, and and fabricate lies against the truth, and stand against the word of Yahweh of host.

“Keep me, O Yahweh, from the hands of the wicked, preserve me from the violent sire, who have purposed to overthrow my goings. The proud have hid a snare for me, and cords, they have spread a net by the wayside, they have set gins for me. Selah. “

Psalm 140:4-5


“Pride goes before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall. Better it is to be of an humble spirit with the lowly, than to divide the spoil with the proud.”

Proverbs 16:18-19
“Blessed is the valiant that make Yahweh his trust, and respects not the proud, nor such as turn aside to lies.”

Psalm 40:4


Because Yahweh sanctified them, no real Jew would outlaw Jacob as a bigamist and or a bigot, and his four mates as adulteresses, and the children of Israel as bastards, and no real Jew would outlaw Yahweh's promised Christ and the Bride of Christ, and no real Jew would promote and or legalize homosexuality, but that is the only two choices that the US Politicians that call themselves Jews offer, with their man made Laws of one man, one woman, and or legalize gay marriage.

Because Yahweh sanctified them, no real Christian would outlaw Jacob as a bigamist and or a bigot, and his four mates as adulteresses, and the children of Israel as bastards, and no real Christian would outlaw Yahweh's promised Christ and the Bride of Christ, and no real Christian would promote and or legalize homosexuality, but that is the only two choices that the US Politicians that call themselves Christians offer, with their man made Laws of one man, one woman, and or legalize gay marriage.

They are neither real Jews or real Christians, they are worse than hypocrites, because unlike hypocrites that know the truth and do not do it, these that call themselves Jews and Christian in the US Government, do not even know the truth, they just fabricate and promote lies against Yahweh and his anointed that they call Christ.

The President's announcement about Gay Marriage has resulted in a backlash of believer bashing. Anyone like me who believes the scriptures, is automatically labeled a Gay basher, and is attacked as such.

They don't care that because of the Gay vs Straight issue, our religious belief about marriage has been outlawed by blind bigot religious fanatics, outlawing Jacob and his four women as a bigamist and adulteresses, and outlawing the children of Israel as bastards, and outlawing the Bridegroom Christ and his Bride the Church, and outlawing anyone that would live by their examples, all outlawed by their man made one man, one woman, marriage laws. Because our religious belief is outlawed by their man made laws, it is legal for them to count the scriptures as old worthless documents, and to become believer bashers.

They do not understand that those who are promoting and outlawing those things by their man made marriage laws, are no different than Gays, they are idolaters that have no right to an inheritance in the kingdom of God.

They hate us because our doctrine comes straight from the scriptures, and they hate God and his word.

By their man made definition of traditional marriage, they persecute and or prosecute all who would dare to believe God and his scriptures.

“For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God.”

They take words of the word of God, and they twist them and they add and or remove words to corrupt the word of God that they use to support their position against God, using the names of God, but we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God.

In Hebrew אשּׁה ishshah, woman, and in Greek γυνή, gune, and γυναικα, gunaka, woman, is named upon girls at age 12 because they are able to conceive a child or ideas, and in Hebrew אישׁ Iysh, and in Greek ανηρ, aner, and ανδρα, andra, these words are used of both a Father, and of a woman's mate, and is used of a woman's child and male animals, and is named upon boys at age 13 because they are able to “sire” a child and or ideas. It is also used of a farmer that plants seed, some say it means "Husband of the Land," אישׁ האדמה but it is a "sire of the land," which they translate as "husbandman." They translate these words as they please, translating them "husband" and "man" and "male" and "husbandman" in you English Bibles, but they should be translated as a “sire” being God and or a man or child or animals that are capable of sowing seed.

When speaking of the anointed and or of a Father and or of animals, in their system of translating it as they please, if they translate it as “Husband,” it reveals that these words have nothing to do with their definition of traditional marriage, but have to with a “sire” that is capable of sowing seed.

Here I will translate it as Husband in these two verses that speak about Yahshua whom they call Jesus. Yahshua is the Hebrew transliteration of the Hebrew name that they translate as Joshua and Jesus.

“yea, take silver and gold, and make crowns, and set them upon the head of Yahshua the son of Yahozadak, the high priest, and speak unto him, saying, 'Thus speaks Yahweh of hosts, saying, Behold, the HUSBAND whose name is the branch, and he shall grow up out of his place, and he shall build the temple of Yahweh, even he shall build the temple of Yahweh, and he shall bear the glory, and shall sit and rule upon his throne, and he shall be a priest upon his throne, and the counsel of peace shall be between them both.”

Zechariah 6:11-13

“For I am jealous over you with godly jealousy, for I have espoused you to one HUSBAND, that I may present a chaste virgin to the anointed.”

2 Corinthians 11:2


It should be translated “sire,” but in all reality, their definition of traditional marriage just went out the window, because they call what God sanctifies, evil, by their definition of traditional marriage.


Abraham took more than one woman to mate, Jacob took more than one woman to mate, Elkanah took more than one woman to mate, David took more than one woman to mate, and Solomon took more than one woman to mate, and all these and their mates were sanctified in God's definition of marriage, so again their definition of traditional marriage just went out the window, because they call what God sanctifies, evil, by their definition of traditional marriage, and by their man made definition of traditional marriage, they persecute and or prosecute all who would dare to believe God and his scriptures, and or who would dare live by their examples.


“Now thanks be unto God, which always causes us to triumph within the anointed, and makes manifest the savor of his knowledge by us in every place. For we are unto God a sweet savor of the anointed, within them that are saved, and within them that perish, to that one we are the savor of death unto death, and to the other the savor of life unto life, and who is sufficient for these things? For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God, but as of sincerity, but as of God, within the sight of God speak we within the anointed.”

2 Corinthians 2:14-17

http://josephsbusiness.com/index.htm

In service of Yahweh and Country

Lord Joseph

Heir by birthright of the house of Israel

Kickin&amp;#39; Ass and Takin&amp;#39; Names

unread,
May 14, 2012, 7:40:24 AM5/14/12
to
So -- are you telling us that our most prolific poster here on
alt.politics is "wrong, perverted, unnatural, and very dangerous?"

I am, of course, referring to the twisted, lonely, unemployed loser
who called himself Patriot Games, but who now uses Buster Norris,
patriotgamesatdemocratichallofshame, and dozens of other nyms? You
know, the guy who uses my nym every day to post through aioe espousing
exactly what you are talking about.

Ken

unread,
May 14, 2012, 10:03:06 AM5/14/12
to
Dave has said he was "Good at 'it'"

ilbe...@gmail.com

unread,
May 14, 2012, 10:28:18 AM5/14/12
to
It doesnt make it correct now does it ? You can also have lots of
wonderful things from money stolen from a bank . The butt was made
for human excrement to flow out of it without any restriction , and,
human feces has ALOT of various diseases in it which can infect the
Butt Pursuer (male) . When you sit down on a toliet seat next time,
notice how the feces drops into the bowl .... thats how it is supposed
to work . You dont make love with it . Sorry. Just stick to the way
the Creator made things and you will do just fine. So will society.

Ken

unread,
May 14, 2012, 10:51:31 AM5/14/12
to
On May 14, 7:28 am, "IlBenButtfucked @gmail.com" wrote:
> The butt was made
> for me to stick it

Davie Boi: We all know you're still a HOMO, butt do you need to brag
about it?

Devils Advocaat

unread,
May 14, 2012, 12:32:30 PM5/14/12
to
So Dave, care to explain the genitalia of the female spotted hyena?

Wombat

unread,
May 14, 2012, 1:57:27 PM5/14/12
to
So why do some women and some men have the anal sphincter as an extra
erogenous zone? Why does pressure against the front wall of the rectum
produce erections in men as the prostate gland is compressed, leading
to (I have heard) massive ejectulations and rather nice orgasms?
Why do some animals also practice anal sex?

Devils Advocaat

unread,
May 14, 2012, 2:56:32 PM5/14/12
to
And why the oddity of the genitalia of the female spotted hyena?

Ginny Marlys Wolf

unread,
May 14, 2012, 8:00:03 PM5/14/12
to
'Lickin' Ass and Fakin' Military Service' is a Proven Fraud, a Proven
Liar and a Proven Thief. She is the most prolific liar in this
newsgroup and also the most prolific thief of other's writings. She is
also a Stolen Valor stain on America. Note that when you reply to a
Proven Liar you encourage them to continue lying.

[][][][][][]


The DemocRAT Hall Of Shame http://www.democrathallofshame.com/ asks
"Why do you always LIE?"


[Courtesy of Buster Norris]

On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 20:10:01 -0400, Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
<PopUl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:34:39 -0400, Metspitzer <kilo...@charter.net>
>wrote:
>>It has been reported over and over that the Black Panthers used racial
>>slurs at the Philadelphia polling station in 2008.
>>I have yet to read the language they used. Anyone have a record of
>>what was said?
>>I have seen video clips of Zulu Shabazz saying..........We need to
>>kill some crackers and "they" babies.
>>http://spectator.org/archives/2010/10/04/panther-case-no-shot-in-the-da
>"Shabazz" was at the polling place for about 15 minutes. The man
>standing next to him was a certified, legal poll watcher. Someone
>called the cops and Shabazz was ushered away from the polling place
>and did not return. NOT A SINGLE PERSON reported that they were
>intimidated.

LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"Witnesses reported seeing at least several voters take stock of the
situation and turn around and leave without voting. Former Kennedy
family civil rights lawyer Bartle Bull, who was on the scene, said it
was the worst example of voter intimidation he had ever seen."
http://spectator.org/archives/2010/10/04/panther-case-no-shot-in-the-da

Posted from:
The DemocRATs Hall of Shame!
http://www.democrathallofshame.com/

Wombat

unread,
May 15, 2012, 1:21:46 AM5/15/12
to
I'd heard that there was something unusual about the female hyena's
reproductive equipment but your posts on the matter finally encouraged
me to find out exactly what. I can only say: WOW!

Devils Advocaat

unread,
May 15, 2012, 8:28:59 AM5/15/12
to
I would have thought the word would have been EWW!

Wombat

unread,
May 15, 2012, 10:14:12 AM5/15/12
to
The wonders of creation?
0 new messages