THE GRANT REPORT - VOL ONE - MARCH 2007 AXIS OF EVIL ARTICLE 1637
THE IRANIAN CONNECTION TO TERRORISM AND 911
OUR ENEMY IRAN
© Copyright all materials written by Author DGV Reiman 2007 and 2008,
all rights reserved. By posting or publishing this article and other
copyrighted articles on USENET and/or elsewhere, Author is expressly NOT
granting any implied authorization to reproduce his copyrighted work in
any manner. The Author further does not accept as "Fair Use" under U.S.
Code Title 17, nor will condone, the reproduction of any portion of his
copyrighted materials IN ANY MANNER for the purpose of harassing,
stalking or defaming the Author, or in conjunction with any violation of
any civil or criminal statutes. Violators will face legal action. If
anyone wishes to reproduce my copyrighted materials all they need to do
first is email me and receive back via email my written permission to do
so - such permission will not be unreasonably withheld. As I have often
stated, I post copyrighted articles on USENET for a pre-review by the
public prior to placing those articles in a book to be sold in
international commerce. All those that read these articles already know
or should already know my copyrighted articles cannot be infringed upon
in any manner simply because they were first posted on USENET. Moreover,
according to case law and expert answers in respect to this issue, the
general stated policy of newgroups, such as to invite comment, DOES NOT
preclude, supercede nor abrogate the author's right of copyright
protection. Moreover, case law has further provided a precedent that
"Fair Use" cannot be claimed by an infringer to disguise the spiteful
and defaming reproduction of an author's work.
(Smear Merchant Disclaimer: Please note this article (the same as all of
my past articles and exchanges with posters) represents an editorial on
contemporary issues and events - my opinion. Nothing in this article
represents in any manner any asseveration of biographical fact, nor is
about, directed toward or against any particular person - other than
those specifically mentioned herein. This article is being posted for
entertainment purposes only. If any person finds this post personally
annoying, abusive, defaming or otherwise disturbing, please notify me of
your specific reasons for annoyance via email at legal...@comcast.net.
If we find your detailed objections reasonable (considering the
"reasonable person" doctrine and case law) we will then remove this
post, or the offending passages contained therein, from the Google
archive, publicly apologize and retract. My intent is to entertain, and
to present articles to USENET readers prior to publication to determine
interest, and not to annoy, abuse, humiliate, or in any way cause anyone
emotional harm by posting on USENET or elsewhere. Please note that
defending myself from harassment and obloquy with rebuttal posts has
been deemed a "lawful and legitimate" publication by my legal counsel.
If I am not attacked, defamed or harassed, or my copyrighted articles
not interrupted nor infringed upon, I clearly do not have a reason to
respond with a rebuttal. Please also note that I intend to notify any
and all ISP's and web hosts of any annoying or calumnious post, web site
or other similar entity about me after I give the offender an
opportunity to retract, apologize and remove said post from the Google
archive).
NUCLEAR ATTACK BY IRAN - WARNS MR. BENJAMIN NETANYAHU (SEE BELOW).
The USA has been at war with Iran for three decades. And now Iran has
decided to include Britain in its realm of hate by using an act of
Piracy to kidnap British soldiers and then humiliate them on the world
stage and refusing to release them. Clearly, all the talking with Iran
in the past had no impact on the incredible irresponsibility of the
Ayatollahs running Iran. They still exist in their own little bizarre
world of religious fanaticism.
1. Iran is mainly responsible for all the radical Muslim butchery and
inhuman murder in the world. Iran has directly sponsored and ordered the
murders of thousands of Americans, Jews and other allies of America.
Iran's Ayatollahs and "Parliament" call for the death of the USA and
Israel during every meeting. The Ayatollahs end their prayers every
Friday in all Mosques in Iran (and in most Muslim nations controlled by
radical Islam) with "Death to America" instead of "Amen."
Iranian-sponsored Modressa's (schools for boys) teach their young pupils
that murdering Americans and Jews is crucial to the survival of the
Muslim religion, and Allah will hold a special place in paradise for
those Muslims that manage to murder Americans and Jews, especially if
they do so while committing suicide. There are hundreds of these
Modressa's throughout the Muslim world, and they "graduate" thousands of
screaming maniacal goons every year. Iran is also sponsoring Al Jeezera,
which is the propaganda arm of radical Islam, Iran is also the direct
sponsor of Hezbollah, Hamas and now Al Qaeda as well.
2. Iran's supreme Muslim Council, through its "Revolutionary Guard " and
"Jerusalem Brigade" control and coordinates most if not all of the
radical Muslim terrorist groups throughout the world. Iran finances,
arms and trains most terrorists. Iran offers terrorist training camps in
ten locations throughout Iran, and terrorists from all Muslim nations,
including the Palestinians, have sent terrorists to train at these
camps. Prior to 911, Iran, Iraq and Lebanon were training terrorists to
hi jack commercial air liners with small knives, in groups of five
terrorists per hi jack, and one of the terrorists had to be a qualified
pilot. Sound Familiar?
3. Based upon my months of investigation in respect to radical Muslim
terrorism, I have concluded that ALL radical Muslim terrorist
organizations are interconnected in some way or another, and they ALL
receive some type of support and/or direction from Iran. Iran is
spending almost all of its oil money to sponsor radical Muslim terrorism
in one way or another.
Now of course we also know that Iran has had a clandestine nuclear
weapon program for the past twenty years, and Iran has said clearly and
often it intends to build nuclear weapons.
4. Yet lately, due mostly to the efforts of the Left-Wing-Nut
politicians in the USA, we are supposed to sit down with this sworn
enemy and negotiate a way Iran will not attack us. Fact, Iran will
*never* stop trying to build nuclear weapons, and it might even move its
nuclear programs into Syria or Lebanon along with Saddam's WMD
stockpiles. The Europeans can inspect Iran all they want, and they will
never find Iran's clandestine nuclear bomb programs as they are and will
be too well hidden. (Even if the Europeans get close to finding the
Iranian hidden weapon's programs, we will then start to see some of the
old Saddam tactics, like refusals to allow inspections, stalls, and
other obstructionist tactics to buy time).
5. The Iranians might agree to our begging offers to please not hurt us
because they want to gain (1) economical benefits (2) secretly continue
to build their nuclear weapons (3) continue to sponsor terrorism and use
UN agreements to stop the USA from invading Iran and stopping them from
sponsoring terrorism.
6. If the UN pens any kind of deal with Iran about stopping Iran's
building of nuclear weapons, then they will be deceived, and it will
American cities that will pay the price of that deception, not the
Europeans. Moreover, if the UN does offer a deal to Iran to stop
building Nuclear weapons, that deal must include the provision that (1)
Iran will also stop sponsoring terrorism and (2) Syria and Lebanon must
be a part of the deal and make the same verifiable promises as Iran.
I believe that Iran will sign anything, say anything, promise anything,
to buy time to finish its nuclear weapon's program. Then, after the
nuclear bombs are built, Iran will announce to the world that it has
nuclear weapons, and mention the fact that in the Koran the Prophet
Mohammed says that "Deals with Christians and Jews are not binding on
Muslims!"
The UN members should be reminded of the old adage:
"You cannot make a deal with the Devil."
Doug Grant (Tm)
Mr. Benjamin Netanyahu provides a dire warning for the world about Iran:
"This is not merely a local problem, this is a global problem. If Iran
acquires nuclear weapons everything we have been talking about will pale
in comparison," Netanyahu said on April 16, 2008
"Iran's Ayatollahs goals are unlimited. Whatever successes they have had
so far, they don't intend to stop. The militant Shiites in Iran are
openly boasting that they are racing to develop nuclear weapons with the
explicit announced goal of wiping Israel off the face of the map, and of
reestablishing the caliphate, of course under militant Iranian rule."
Iran's influence in the region is growing, Netanyahu said in comments
reported by the Middle East Times. Hezbollah, the Lebanese Shiite
movement supported by Iran, now has some 40,000 rockets aimed at Israel.
"That's a lot more than they had before the Second Lebanon war,"
Netanyahu told the Times.
He also said that Hezbollah's newer rockets have a much longer range and
could now reach most of Israel. They are also far more lethal than those
used in that Lebanon war two years ago.
"And this is all done by Iran. It cannot be understood as anything but
an Iranian operation," he added.
"I said a year and a half ago that the year is 1938 and Iran is Germany
and it's racing to acquire nuclear weapons. If that's the case, were now
1939. There is about two years left before Iran becomes a nuclear power.
"The bottom line is that the army of Iran with nuclear weapons must be
stopped."
Netanyahu said "the first thing we must do - and by we, I mean the
civilized community of nations - [is] to do everything in our power to
prevent the arming of Iran with nuclear weapons."
End war rattles:
Doug's Extension to excerpts:
Will we Bomb Iran?
There is speculation the USA and its allies are preparing for a military
attack on Iran's nuclear facilities - before President Bush leaves
office. All of the usual saber rattling and ally maneuvering prior to a
major preemptive attack seems to be occurring:
1. Vice President Dick Cheney made a recent trip to the Middle East and
he secretly met with some of our key allies.
2. President Bush announced on April 10, 2008 that Iran and Al Qaida are
"two of the greatest threats to America." This was after Iran announced
on April 8 that it installed 6,000 new weapons grade nuclear material
producing centrifuges at its uranium enrichment plant in Natanz.
3. President Bush and Vice President Cheney have both repeatedly stated
they would not allow Iran to build Nuclear weapons.
The question is whether President Bush will step down while allowing a
Nuclear Iran to become the problem of the next administration and the
American people? Or, will he, as he has done in the past, hold the
priority to protect the American people far and above mere politics or
"approval ratings?" Especially when those "approval ratings" are coming
from an obviously biased pro shuck and jive south Chicago con man
liberal press, and from those brainless womps that believe they know
more about this issue than our entire intelligence community and the
commander in chief.
Remember, Mushroom clouds are not political - they kill both Democrats
and Republicans.
Doug Grant (Tm)
"DGVREIMAN" <dgvr...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3uqdnYX6BIXyrJTV...@comcast.com
> THE GRANT REPORT - VOL ONE - MARCH 2007 AXIS OF EVIL
> ARTICLE 1637
> THE IRANIAN CONNECTION TO TERRORISM AND 911
>
>
>
> OUR ENEMY IRAN
>
> Š Copyright all materials written by Author DGV Reiman
NETANYAHU is Adolf incarnated. The sooner the likes of him are wiped off the
planet the better off everyone will be.
Read the warning against the passionate attachment and avoiding
entangling alliances (like we have with Israel) by Founding Father
George Washington at the bottom of the following URL:
Courageous American Jew Jack Bernstein warned US about nefarious
Israel firsters (Zionists) in his 'Life of an American Jew in Racist/
Marxist Israel' via the following URL when he mentioned that Zionists
(like 'DGVREIMAN') would trick US into fighting wars in the Middle
East for Israel with many Americans dying/getting horribly maimed as a
result (see the mention of such at the following URL):
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/israel.htm
See the following youtube video for why we were tragically attacked at
the World Trade Center in 1993 and 9/11 (because of US support for
Israel, but the Israel first 'US' media doesn't tell US such and
allows Bush to lie and send American soldiers/marines into a war for
Israel - not 9/11 - in Iraq as he is about to do the same with Iran
for Israel as well):
Video that gets to the Israel question:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1bm2GPoFfg
Additional at the following URL:
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=39590
AIPAC is Pushing US to War with Iran (for Israel):
http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2007/10/re-aipac-is-pushing-us-to-war-with-iran.html
http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.BLOGSPOT.COM
http://NOMOREWARFORISRAEL.BLOGSPOT.COM
Additional about coming war with Iran (for Israel) at the following
URL:
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=49800
Mainstream media is selling US another war (for Israel of course):
Democrats risk war with Iran for Israel's agenda:
On Apr 18, 6:44 pm, "Smirnoff" <Unli...@unlisted.com> wrote:
> "DGVREIMAN" <dgvrei...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>
> news:3uqdnYX6BIXyrJTV...@comcast.com
>
>
>
> > THE GRANT REPORT - VOL ONE - MARCH 2007 AXIS OF EVIL
> > ARTICLE 1637
> > THE IRANIAN CONNECTION TO TERRORISM AND 911
>
> > OUR ENEMY IRAN
>
> > © Copyright all materials written by Author DGV Reiman
> > annoyance via email at legalco...@comcast.net. If we find
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/3717
Why aren't we talking about this?
Iran War, Real Fear Petraeus Beating War Drums for Attack:
http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2008/04/why-arent-we-talking-about-this.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dP7LnypeLes&feature=PlayList&p=22A19DD346BB4C4D&index=0&playnext=1
Lieberman putting the Yarmulke on McCain's head during their recent
trip to Israel:
http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2008/03/make-people-aware-subscribe.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfLeZXrluZw
A Clean Break/war for Israel agenda (as conveyed by esteeemed
intelligence author/writer James Bamford in his 'A Pretext for War'
book):
http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2008/02/clean-break.html
Bamford's 'A Pretext for War' book had been instrumental in turning
Republican Congressman Walter 'Freedom Fries' Jones against the Iraq
quagmire as he has also been pushing (along with Senator Jim Webb) to
stop the coming war with Iran which will be for Israel as well as
mentioned above:
http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2006/01/the_three_conversions_of_walter_b_jones.html
The paperback version of 'A Pretext for War' includes an additional
section at the end about the ongoing AIPAC espionage case which the
Israel first 'US' media isn't covering either for the most part
(Bamford mentioned the case in the following article for Rolling Stone
magazine):
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/10962352/iran_the_next_war
Latest on the ongoing AIPAC espionage case which most Americans don't
even know about:
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=86424
On Apr 19, 9:49 am, NOMOREWARFORISRAEL <NOMOREWAR_FORISR...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2007/10/re-aipac-is-pushing-u...
>
> http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.BLOGSPOT.COM
>
> http://NOMOREWARFORISRAEL.BLOGSPOT.COM
>
> Additional about coming war with Iran (for Israel) at the following
> URL:
>
> http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=49800
>
> Mainstream media is selling US another war (for Israel of course):
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwxzt4iPkNE&feature=PlayList&p=22A19DD...
>
> Democrats risk war with Iran for Israel's agenda:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtwD12ZV5wQ&feature=PlayList&p=22A19DD...
Iraq War Conceived in Israel:
http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/snieg_conc1.htm
Scroll down to the comments section of the following URL:
http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2008/04/why-arent-we-talking-about-this.html
Also be sure to read the 'Thinking about Neoconservatism' article and
the 'Neoconservatism as a Jewish Movement' monograph (both by Kevin
MacDonald) which are linked near the top of the following URL:
Neoconservatism as a Jewish Movement:
http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=32606
On Apr 19, 10:01 am, NOMOREWARFORISRAEL
<NOMOREWAR_FORISR...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Secret U.S. Air Force team planning Iranian strike, led by Jews:
>
> http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/3717
>
> Why aren't we talking about this?
>
> Iran War, Real Fear Petraeus Beating War Drums for Attack:
>
> http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2008/04/why-arent-we-talking-...
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dP7LnypeLes&feature=PlayList&p=22A19DD...
>
> Lieberman putting the Yarmulke on McCain's head during their recent
> trip to Israel:
>
> http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2008/03/make-people-aware-sub...
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfLeZXrluZw
>
> A Clean Break/war for Israel agenda (as conveyed by esteeemed
> intelligence author/writer James Bamford in his 'A Pretext for War'
> book):
>
> http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2008/02/clean-break.html
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNN9cMvnHdc&eurl=http://neoconzionistt...
>
> Bamford's 'A Pretext for War' book had been instrumental in turning
> Republican Congressman Walter 'Freedom Fries' Jones against the Iraq
> quagmire as he has also been pushing (along with Senator Jim Webb) to
> stop the coming war with Iran which will be for Israel as well as
> mentioned above:
>
> http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2006/01/the_three_conversions...
If you have greater allegiance to Israel than to America, MOVE YOUR
SUBVERSIVE ASS to your country of greatest allegiance, and FIGHT YOUR OWN
BLOODY BATTLES!
"NOMOREWARFORISRAEL" <NOMOREWAR...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:85320a68-faa3-4f60...@1g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
The apparent Zionist ('Israel first and foremost') Jew 'DGVREIMAN' is
really working it hard to get even more Americans to die/get horribly
maimed for Israel as a result of the war for Israel in Iraq being
expanded to Iran (Netanyahu was in the US working it to get US to
attack Iraq for Israel and is now doing similar to get US to attack
Iran for Israel as well):
Doug Says: First, you are violating my copyrights, cease and desist
immediately. Second, I am a Catholic, have been a Catholic all my adult
life, my wife is also a Catholic, and neither of us are Zionists - we do
believe however that Israel is perhaps the best and staunchest ally the
USA has ever had - and that Iran is perhaps one of the worst enemies the
USA has ever had.
Doug Grant (Tm)
What do we get for Israel being "staunch"?
What Ninny-yahoo says doesn't matter.
Ninny is a sociopath.
Doug Says: A power in the middle east that can help us protect our
interests, and a homeland for the Jews. Don't you think they deserve
it?
Doug Grant (Tm)
'Staunch allies' don't sell classified US military systems to
communist china and other inimical nations..
Nor do they spy on the ir US 'ally'..
Nor do they do exactly what the US suggests they NOT do.. hours after
the US president leaves their country..
And for this we pay them $5,000,000,000.00+ dollars USD every year ???
How have they done that?
Exactly... See Pat Buchanan's 'Whose War?' article via the following
URL:
Whose War? (Israel's war):
http://www.amconmag.com/03_24_03/cover.html
Even Michael Scheuer (who used to head up the Bin Laden unit for the
CIA) basically endorsed Ron Paul in the following youtube video (of
course the fifth columnist Israel first crowd doesn't like Ron
Paul!):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAehMPVFFE0
Michael Scheuer (former head of CIA Bin Laden unit) was on Bill Maher.
He said:
" Israel is not worth an American life or an American dollar." and
"Our unqualified support of Israel has brought the US a great deal of
pain and increasingly dead Americans, fighting wars that are not ours
to fight." and
" America is fighting a war that does not exist -- our politicians
have lied to us-it is not about hating freedom, womens' rights etc.---
it is about our policies in the Middle East ."
US support of Israel is against US national interests you moron.. What
do you think brought about 9/11 (US support for Israel's brutal
oppression of the Palestinians via a pro-Israel lobby which owns the
US Congress as respected political science professors John Mearsheimer
and Stephen Walt convey in their 'The Israel Lobby and US Foreign
Policy' book - see www.israellobbybook.com):
Additional about Mearsheimer and Walt at the following URL:
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=49800
http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.BLOGSPOT.COM
http://NOMOREWARFORISRAEL.BLOGSPOT.COM
Remember Israel's treacherous attack on the USS Liberty too:
http://www.ussliberty.org and http://www.ussliberty.com
Read the Chicago Tribune article (about the attack on the USS Liberty)
which is linked at the following URL:
http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2007/10/re-aipac-is-pushing-us-to-war-with-iran.html
Take a look at what Admiral Moorer said as well:
http://www.realnews247.com/uss_liberty_betrayal_moorer.htm
"I've never seen a President -- I don't care who he is -- stand up to
[Israel] ... They always get what they want. The Israelis know what is
going on all the time. I got to the point where I wouldn't write
anything down. If the American people understood what a grip these
people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms."
http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/3717
http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2008/04/why-arent-we-talking-...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dP7LnypeLes&feature=PlayList&p=22A19DD...
http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2008/03/make-people-aware-sub...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfLeZXrluZw
http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2008/02/clean-break.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNN9cMvnHdc&eurl=http://neoconzionistt...
http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2006/01/the_three_conversions...
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/10962352/iran_the_next_war
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=86424
Doesn't matter how much of a debacle it is in Iraq.. The Israel
firsters with the JINSA crowd in control of the Pentagon via JINSA/
PNAC/AEI associated Dick Cheney want Iran to be attacked for Israel
and will get it (even Colin Powell mentioned that the JINSA crowd was/
is in control of the Pentagon for Washington Post correspondent Karen
DeYoung's bio book about him):
A War for Israel? Colin Powell seems to think so:
http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=61128
The Transparent Cabal (The Neoconservative Agenda, War in the Middle
East and the National Agenda of Israel):
Iraq War Conceived in Israel:
http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/snieg_conc1.htm
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.BLOGSPOT.COM
http://NOMOREWARFORISRAEL.BLOGSPOT.COM
On Apr 20, 12:00 am, NOMOREWARFORISRAEL
<NOMOREWAR_FORISR...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 19, 9:55 pm, "DGVREIMAN" <dgvrei...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > "Dr. James West, Ph.D." <n...@nobull.com> wrote in messagenews:U8KdnfZp6dhn-pfVnZ2dnUVZ_vWdnZ2d@toastnet...
>
> > > DGVREIMAN wrote:
>
> > >> Israel is perhaps the best and staunchest ally the USA has ever had
>
> > > What do we get for Israel being "staunch"?
>
> > Doug Says: A power in the middle east that can help us protect our
> > interests, and a homeland for the Jews. Don't you think they deserve
> > it?
>
> > Doug Grant (Tm)
>
> US support of Israel is against US national interests you moron.. What
> do you think brought about 9/11 (US support for Israel's brutal
> oppression of the Palestinians via a pro-Israel lobby which owns the
> US Congress as respected political science professors John Mearsheimer
> and Stephen Walt convey in their 'The Israel Lobby and US Foreign
> Policy' book - seewww.israellobbybook.com):
>
> Additional about Mearsheimer and Walt at the following URL:
>
> http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=49800
>
> http://NEOCONZIONISTTHREAT.BLOGSPOT.COM
>
> http://NOMOREWARFORISRAEL.BLOGSPOT.COM
>
> Remember Israel's treacherous attack on the USS Liberty too:
>
> http://www.ussliberty.organdhttp://www.ussliberty.com
>
> Read the Chicago Tribune article (about the attack on the USS Liberty)
> which is linked at the following URL:
>
> http://neoconzionistthreat.blogspot.com/2007/10/re-aipac-is-pushing-u...
Subject: The Transparent Cabal
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:56:13 -0400
Friends,
My book, "The Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative Agenda, War in
the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel," is coming out
in June (or perhaps late May). It is listed on Amazon at
http://www.amazon.com/Transparent-Cabal-Neoconservative-National-Interest/dp/1932528172
and can be pre-ordered. I might add that it is generating some
interest and often has been ranked in Amazon's top 100 for 21st-
century U.S. history books.
I am trying to get publicity for the book. Reviews from large
publications are not likely. Unfortunately, even publications that
deal with the neocon issue, such as “The American Conservative,” seem
unwilling to review it. (Pre- publication, bound-galley copies have
been distributed.)
I would appreciate hearing from anyone who would be willing to review
the book for a publication or website; let me know, and I will contact
the publisher to obtain a review copy. I would also appreciate help in
obtaining speaking engagements to promote my book, especially radio
interviews over the telephone (since my travel funds are limited). Any
other publicity provided for my new book would also be very much
appreciated. It would be very helpful to have the book mentioned as
much as possible on the Web and/or on mailing lists.
Attached are a few publicity items from the publisher.
Dissemination would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Steve Sniegoski
The following is a brief summary of the book.
The Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative Agenda, War in the Middle
East, and the National Interest of Israel
By Stephen J. Sniegoski
This work examines a controversial, and in some respects, taboo
subject: the role of the neoconservatives as the fundamental driving
force in the Bush administration’s war on Iraq in 2003 and the
subsequent militant American policy in the Middle East, and the close
relationship of these neocons’ with the Israeli Likudnik right. It
marshals evidence to illustrate that this foreign-policy blunder – of
colossal proportions, from the perspective of the American national
interest – stems from the fact that the policy, pushed by the
neoconservatives, was created to serve the interests of a foreign
country, namely Israel. Such a thesis does not mean that the
neoconservatives intentionally sought to aid Israel at the expense of
the United States, but rather that they have seen American foreign
policy through the lens of Israeli interest.
While not focused on the neoconservative movement per se, this book
reviews the background of the neoconservatives – their network and
agenda – as it relates to the aforementioned foreign-policy theme.
What characterizes neoconservatives is not only their but also their
personal interconnectedness in terms of organizations, publications,
schooling, and even blood. Of crucial importance is how the neocons,
over the years, identified closely with the interests of Israel, and
how their Middle East agenda paralleled that of the Israeli Likudnik
right. In fact, much of the neocon approach to the Middle East can be
seen to have originated in Likudnik thinking. And the Israeli
government of Ariel Sharon worked in tandem with the neocons in
supporting both the war on Iraq and the U.S.’s later militant policies
toward Iran and Syria.
The overarching goal of both the neocons and the Likudniks was to
create an improved strategic environment for Israel. The aim of the
neoconservative and Likudnik foreign-policy strategy was to weaken and
fragment Israel’s adversaries in the Middle East and concomitantly
increase Israel’s relative strength, both externally and internally. A
key objective was to eliminate the demographic threat posed by the
Palestinians to the Jewish state, which the destabilization of
Israel’s external enemies would achieve, since the Palestinian
resistance depended upon external support, both moral and material.
Without outside support, the Palestinians would be forced to accede to
whatever type of peaceful solution Israel offered.
The neoconservative position on the Middle East was the polar opposite
of what had been the traditional United States foreign policy, set by
what might be called the foreign-policy establishment. The goal of the
traditional policy was to promote stability in the Middle East in
order to maintain the flow of oil. In contrast to pursuing stability –
the traditional goal – the neocons called for destabilizing various of
the existing regimes in the Middle East. Of course, the neocons
couched their policy in terms of the eventual restabilization of the
region on a democratic basis. This work questions the
genuineness of the neocons’ motives with respect to democracy – at
least in light of how democracy is normally understood.
Over the years, the neocons developed a powerful, interlocking network
of think tanks, organizations, and media outlets outside of government
with the express purpose of influencing American foreign policy. By
the end of the 1990s, the neoconservatives developed a complete
blueprint for the remaking of the Middle East by military means,
starting with Iraq. It was only by becoming an influential part of the
administration of George W. Bush that they obtained a position to make
their Israeli-centric agenda actual American policy.
But the neocons did not gain the upper hand in formulating the foreign
policy of the Bush administration until the terror attacks of
September 11, 2001 – which proved to be the pivotal events in the
neocon ascendancy. When the administration looked for a plan to deal
with terrorism, the neocons had one to offer, and a network, inside
and outside of the government, to promote it.
The second President Bush was essentially a convert to neoconservative
policy. Prior to 9/11, Bush never exhibited any strong understanding
of or interest in Middle East policy, and was therefore in need of the
kind of guidance that the neocons could present in a simple paradigm—
good versus evil—that Bush would find attractive.
The neocons did not drag the majority of the American people into war
in 2003 against their collective will. In large measure, the
neoconservative militaristic agenda resonated with an American public
and Congress that had been traumatized by terror and was desperately
seeking a way to retaliate. Moreover, the neocon network, inside and
outside the government, was in place to push the bogus propaganda –
most critically regarding the non-existent weapons of mass destruction
(WMD) threat posed by Iraq – to successfully mobilize congressional
and popular support for the war agenda.
The book goes over the post-invasion issues and the neocon efforts to
extend the destabilization effort elsewhere in the Middle East,
especially Iran. Emphasized is the opposition to this agenda by the
foreign policy establishment. This opposition combined with the
increasing unpopularity of the war in Iraq has so far limited the
extension of the neocon war agenda, though its impact so far has
already served to destabilize the region.
Moreover, the success of pro-neocon John McCain as the presumptive
Republican presidential nominee illustrates that the neoconservatives’
influence still remains. And the existence of American forces in Iraq
can easily lead to an American war on Iran and the continued
implementation of the neoconservatives’ regional goals.
<<...>> <<...>> <<...>>
Attachments
Files:
press_release_3Apr08.pdf (101k) Scan and Save to Computer
blurbs_no_book.pdf (53k) Scan and Save to Computer
cabal_fact_sheet_pre_pub.pdf (197k)
From: "Stephen Sniegoski"
To: "Sniegoski, Stephen"
Subject: The Transparent Cabal
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 09:56:13 -0400
Friends,
My book, "The Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative Agenda, War in
the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel," is coming out
in June (or perhaps late May). It is listed on Amazon at
http://www.amazon.com/Transparent-Cabal-Neoconservative-National-Interest/dp/1932528172
and can be pre-ordered. I might add that it is generating some
interest and often has been ranked in Amazon's top 100 for 21st-
century U.S. history books.
I am trying to get publicity for the book. Reviews from large
publications are not likely. Unfortunately, even publications that
deal with the neocon issue, such as “The American Conservative,” seem
unwilling to review it. (Pre- publication, bound-galley copies have
been distributed.)
I would appreciate hearing from anyone who would be willing to review
the book for a publication or website; let me know, and I will contact
the publisher to obtain a review copy. I would also appreciate help in
obtaining speaking engagements to promote my book, especially radio
interviews over the telephone (since my travel funds are limited). Any
other publicity provided for my new book would also be very much
appreciated. It would be very helpful to have the book mentioned as
much as possible on the Web and/or on mailing lists.
Attached are a few publicity items from the publisher.
Dissemination would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Steve Sniegoski
The following is a brief summary of the book.
The Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative Agenda, War in the Middle
East, and the National Interest of Israel
By Stephen J. Sniegoski
This work examines a controversial, and in some respects, taboo
subject: the role of the neoconservatives as the fundamental driving
force in the Bush administration’s war on Iraq in 2003 and the
subsequent militant American policy in the Middle East, and the close
relationship of these neocons’ with the Israeli Likudnik right. It
marshals evidence to illustrate that this foreign-policy blunder – of
colossal proportions, from the perspective of the American national
interest – stems from the fact that the policy, pushed by the
neoconservatives, was created to serve the interests of a foreign
country, namely Israel. Such a thesis does not mean that the
neoconservatives intentionally sought to aid Israel at the expense of
the United States, but rather that they have seen American foreign
policy through the lens of Israeli interest.
While not focused on the neoconservative movement per se, this book
reviews the background of the neoconservatives – their network and
agenda – as it relates to the aforementioned foreign-policy theme.
What characterizes neoconservatives is not only their but also their
personal interconnectedness in terms of organizations, publications,
schooling, and even blood. Of crucial importance is how the neocons,
over the years, identified closely with the interests of Israel, and
how their Middle East agenda paralleled that of the Israeli Likudnik
right. In fact, much of the neocon approach to the Middle East can be
seen to have originated in Likudnik thinking. And the Israeli
government of Ariel Sharon worked in tandem with the neocons in
supporting both the war on Iraq and the U.S.’s later militant policies
toward Iran and Syria.
The overarching goal of both the neocons and the Likudniks was to
create an improved strategic environment for Israel. The aim of the
neoconservative and Likudnik foreign-policy strategy was to weaken and
fragment Israel’s adversaries in the Middle East and concomitantly
increase Israel’s relative strength, both externally and internally. A
key objective was to eliminate the demographic threat posed by the
Palestinians to the Jewish state, which the destabilization of
Israel’s external enemies would achieve, since the Palestinian
resistance depended upon external support, both moral and material.
Without outside support, the Palestinians would be forced to accede to
whatever type of peaceful solution Israel offered.
The neoconservative position on the Middle East was the polar opposite
of what had been the traditional United States foreign policy, set by
what might be called the foreign-policy establishment. The goal of the
traditional policy was to promote stability in the Middle East in
order to maintain the flow of oil. In contrast to pursuing stability –
the traditional goal – the neocons called for destabilizing various of
the existing regimes in the Middle East. Of course, the neocons
couched their policy in terms of the eventual restabilization of the
region on a democratic basis. This work questions the
genuineness of the neocons’ motives with respect to democracy – at
least in light of how democracy is normally understood.
Over the years, the neocons developed a powerful, interlocking network
of think tanks, organizations, and media outlets outside of government
with the express purpose of influencing American foreign policy. By
the end of the 1990s, the neoconservatives developed a complete
blueprint for the remaking of the Middle East by military means,
starting with Iraq. It was only by becoming an influential part of the
administration of George W. Bush that they obtained a position to make
their Israeli-centric agenda actual American policy.
But the neocons did not gain the upper hand in formulating the foreign
policy of the Bush administration until the terror attacks of
September 11, 2001 – which proved to be the pivotal events in the
neocon ascendancy. When the administration looked for a plan to deal
with terrorism, the neocons had one to offer, and a network, inside
and outside of the government, to promote it.
The second President Bush was essentially a convert to neoconservative
policy. Prior to 9/11, Bush never exhibited any strong understanding
of or interest in Middle East policy, and was therefore in need of the
kind of guidance that the neocons could present in a simple paradigm—
good versus evil—that Bush would find attractive.
The neocons did not drag the majority of the American people into war
in 2003 against their collective will. In large measure, the
neoconservative militaristic agenda resonated with an American public
and Congress that had been traumatized by terror and was desperately
seeking a way to retaliate. Moreover, the neocon network, inside and
outside the government, was in place to push the bogus propaganda –
most critically regarding the non-existent weapons of mass destruction
(WMD) threat posed by Iraq – to successfully mobilize congressional
and popular support for the war agenda.
The book goes over the post-invasion issues and the neocon efforts to
extend the destabilization effort elsewhere in the Middle East,
especially Iran. Emphasized is the opposition to this agenda by the
foreign policy establishment. This opposition combined with the
increasing unpopularity of the war in Iraq has so far limited the
extension of the neocon war agenda, though its impact so far has
already served to destabilize the region.
Moreover, the success of pro-neocon John McCain as the presumptive
Republican presidential nominee illustrates that the neoconservatives’
influence still remains. And the existence of American forces in Iraq
can easily lead to an American war on Iran and the continued
implementation of the neoconservatives’ regional goals.
<<...>> <<...>> <<...>>
Attachments
Files:
press_release_3Apr08.pdf (101k) Scan and Save to Computer
blurbs_no_book.pdf (53k) Scan and Save to Computer
cabal_fact_sheet_pre_pub.pdf (197k)
On Apr 20, 1:54 am, NOMOREWARFORISRAEL <NOMOREWAR_FORISR...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> 'The Transparent Cabal'
> book (about the Jewish neocons and their war for Israel agenda) by
> Dr.
> Stephen Sniegoski who also wrote the 'Iraq War Conceived in Israel'
> article linked below as well:
>
> The Transparent Cabal (The Neoconservative Agenda, War in the Middle
> East and the National Agenda of Israel):
>
> http://tinyurl.com/3u842h
>
> http://tinyurl.com/47ok9x
>
> Iraq War Conceived in Israel:
>
> http://www.thornwalker.com/ditch/snieg_conc1.htm
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=61128- Hide quoted text -
> "Dr. James West, Ph.D." <na...@nobull.com> wrote in message
> news:U8KdnfZp6dhn-pfVnZ2dnUVZ_vWdnZ2d@toastnet...
>
>>DGVREIMAN wrote:
>>
>>> Israel is perhaps the best and staunchest ally the USA has ever had
>>
>>What do we get for Israel being "staunch"?
>
>
> Doug Says: A power in the middle east that can help us protect our
> interests,
When have they done that?
What have we paid, so far, for Israel being "staunch"?
7,000+ dead Americans (wtc+afghanistan+iraq+)
$6 Billion giveaway every year.
This is the ONLY decision to make!
"Dr. James West, Ph.D." <na...@nobull.com> wrote in message
news:0dGdnWXxL-DnlpDVnZ2dnUVZ_sCtnZ2d@toastnet...
"WTFO" <razzl...@papernapkin.net> wrote in message
news:YVlSj.5240$1M1....@newsfe23.lga
> Opinions do not matter at our level. Fact is we are
> obligated to serve and protect Israel at all costs. So
> the only question is: When do we attack Iran? Before
> the mushroom clouds appear oer Israel or after?
> This is the ONLY decision to make!
>
I vore for after. Nuke after. I'm in favor of Nafter