White Republicans like talking about all the crimes that are committed
by "niggers and beaners". They don't pay attention that ALL Americans
commit crimes, in fact they don't pay attention that some of the most
atrocious crimes a perpetrated by whites.
So, I could be wrong, but hispanics and blacks tend to shoot a
premeditated target. White people on the other hand just go crazy and
shoot everyone.
I bet he was an asian-american.
Chai Soua Vang says hi
He REALLY wanted to use that deer stand.
Charles Ng says, "Har-row" from San Quentin Prison..
http://www.francesfarmersrevenge.com/stuff/serialkillers/miranda.htm
No bet. The odds are too heavily in your favor.
Charles Joseph Whitman
Dylan Klebold
Eric Harris
David Berkowitz
Ted Bundy
Dennis Rader
Manson
Dahmer
Gacy
...
I guess Whitey is just more efficient.
No, blacks and hispanics also go crazy and start shooting. The difference
is that they generally do this in the inner city areas, is almost always due
to drug influence, and are not typically allowed to kill that many people
(their homies are typically also armed) before they are stopped or the SWAT
team is called in.
And you be WRONG and racist... dawg capn..
""No identification was found on the gunman's body, police said.
Eyewitnesses described him as an asian male about six feet tall. He
apparently shot himself in the head after the killings; part of his
face was missing when his body was found. "
Oh please. In fact, the VAST majority of killings (and all crime) is
done
by white folk. Likely white Christian folk (since that is the
predominant
religion).
Now what do you have to say?
Matt
LOL! I say you're full of shit. The vast majority of murder and violent
crime is black on black.
Racist? How can I be racist? Some of my best friends are white!
Muahaha.
Your problem is you don't know a good polemic even if wraps a plastic
bag around your head and beats you with a bat.
The original description of the gunman as Asian meant he could have been
white. As it turns out, according to the latest news, he was Chinese. A
better description would have been Oriental since Asian covers almost every
race.
"""No identification was found on the gunman's body, police said.
Eyewitnesses described him as an asian male about six feet tall. He
apparently shot himself in the head after the killings; part of his
face was missing when his body was found. "..."
______________________________
So now we apparently have a face-eater of some kind running around the
campus, too?
Yeah, you heard that on Rush?
Sorry, kid, you just happen to be wrong.
Matt
No, I happened to read that in the FBI Crime statistics and on a local
level, the criminal statistics for Michigan, including Detroit. If you
remove the violent crimes comitted by blacks just in Detroit, Michigan's
violent crime stats fall to within just 2% of our neighbors to the North,
Ontario.
Then you don't read them too well.
http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/pdf/t4102004.pdf
Total violent crime: 423,830
Crimes by Whites: 256,572
Crimes by Blacks: 157,810
Please 'splain how that adds up to more blacks than whites?
Thanks
Matt
Because blacks only comprise about 15% of the population, dipshit.
I bet he was just plain Asian.
Okay. I bet a million bucks the guy was Asian.
> White Republicans like talking about all the crimes that are committed by
> "niggers and beaners". They don't pay attention that ALL Americans commit
> crimes, in fact they don't pay attention that some of the most atrocious
> crimes a perpetrated by whites.
Will you be sending that by certified check, or money order?
> So, I could be wrong,
Nah....
> but hispanics and blacks tend to shoot a premeditated target. White people
> on the other hand just go crazy and shoot everyone.
Gee, Cap. Keep posting. Maybe one day you'll be right about something.
Hahahahahahah!
Wow Nostradumbass, you must be a superstar at the roulette
tables...coming in after the spin and everything.
Hahahahaha.
Or do they tolerate you occasionally because they're being polite?
The shooter was a Gook so you niggers are off the hook this time.
Check with the FBI. Blacks commit three times as many violent crimes in
America as whites...
> Now what do you have to say?
I say? I say you should shut your hole and read more.
Thank you for that well reasoned response, and for reading the thread
so well. Now, of course, I was replying to someone that said:
> The vast majority of murder and
> violent crime is black on black.
Hm. Seems that they were wrong. And you are a rude obnoxious jerk.
But then, what else is new?
Matt
Really. Care to come up with ANY numbers that show that? Here's a
hint,
you can't, because you stated your argument incorrectly.
>
> > Now what do you have to say?
>
> I say? I say you should shut your hole and read more.
Yes, I'm sure. Another one to the *plonk* list, I see. What IS it
about
you racist jerks?
Matt
>> Oh please. In fact, the VAST majority of killings (and all crime) is
>> done by white folk.
>
>Check with the FBI. Blacks commit three times as many violent crimes in
>America as whites...
>
No, they don't. What you are probably trying and failing to say is
that blacks are three times as likely to commit a violent crime, which
isn't the same thing as commiting three times as many violent crimes.
That your ignoring "per-capita" stats, is pretty much the same as lying.
Why doesn't 256,572 + 157,810 = 423,830????
Are you a LIAR playing with statistics?
From the data below please note that in every crime category, IN EVERY CRIME
CATEGORY, non-whites commit more crime, NON-WHITES COMMIT MORE CRIME, than
do whites.
http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/adducr/age_race_specific.pdf
Crime Incidence is per 100,000
White All Other Races
All Crime
615.1 1,534.9
Violent Crime
164.7 510.2
Murder
3.0 14.8
Forcible Rape
7.3 20.3
Robbery
23.0 132.8
Aggravated Assault
131.5 342.3
Property Crime
450.4 1,024.7
Burglary
84.7 165.9
Larceny-theft
329.6 741.4
Motor Vehicle Theft
36.0 117.4
Arson
6.0 8.1
Forgery and Counterfeiting
33.8 76.6
Fraud
99.7 221.3
Embezzlement
5.8 13.2
Stolen Property
30.8 101.1
Weapons Violations
43.9 133.0
Sex Offenses
29.1 49.5
Gambling
3.1 20.0
Drug Abuse Violations
450.2 1,165.6
Excuse me, did he SAY 'per capita'? No. I gave him raw numbers, which
is
what he claimed. He was wrong. You are wrong. You are also rude and
stupid.
Matt
No, they don't, and you are too stupid to debate. Go back and READ the
report you quote
from, then read mine. See what the difference is. When you can figure
that out, maybe I'll
waste my time with you again.
Matt
> On Apr 17, 6:57 am, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
I read them just fine, I also know how to analyze them.
Population of whites as of June 1st, 2005 = 237,854,954 Crimes by Whites
(Using your numbers) = 256,572 = roughly 1 in every 1000 whites will commit
a violent crime, and that's assuming that I ignore the fact that you lumped
in Hispanics in to your "crimes by whites" figure to artificially inflate
them.
Population of blacks as of that same date = 37,909,341 Crimes by black
(Using your numbers) = 157,810 = 4.2 blacks per 1000 will commit a violent
crime. Violent crime is committed by blacks at a rate over four times
higher than whites. Even using your inflated numbers.
It's simple math.
> On Apr 17, 9:39 am, "Mike Flannigan" <m...@jam.rr.com> wrote:
Most people would know that to be the case.
I did nothing of the sort. I printed the numbers that were on the
page.
>
> Population of blacks as of that same date = 37,909,341 Crimes by black
> (Using your numbers) = 157,810 = 4.2 blacks per 1000 will commit a violent
> crime. Violent crime is committed by blacks at a rate over four times
> higher than whites. Even using your inflated numbers.
Ah, now we are into "per 1000"
>
> It's simple math.
No, its simple English. You claimed something that was wrong. When
PROVEN
that you were wrong, you resorted to statistics. Sorry, chump. Admit
you were wrong, and we can discuss it.
Matt
Really. Most people would say that you were lying. Next?
Matt
Yes, really. Are you stupid as well as deaf?
Suuureeee you did.
>
>>
>> Population of blacks as of that same date = 37,909,341 Crimes by
>> black (Using your numbers) = 157,810 = 4.2 blacks per 1000 will
>> commit a violent crime. Violent crime is committed by blacks at a
>> rate over four times higher than whites. Even using your inflated
>> numbers.
>
> Ah, now we are into "per 1000"
Always was.
>
>>
>> It's simple math.
>
> No, its simple English.
No, it's simple math. Your simple English appears to need some work as
well. In any event, blacks commit crimes in excess of four times the rate
as whites.
No, it wasn't. Go back and re-read what you said.
>
>
>
> >> It's simple math.
>
> > No, its simple English.
>
> No, it's simple math. Your simple English appears to need some work as
> well. In any event, blacks commit crimes in excess of four times the rate
> as whites.
Translation: I'm too much of a baby to admit I was wrong.
Matt
Yes it was.
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>> It's simple math.
>>
>>> No, its simple English.
>>
>> No, it's simple math. Your simple English appears to need some work
>> as well. In any event, blacks commit crimes in excess of four times
>> the rate as whites.
>
> Translation:
No translation needed, fact is fact. Blacks commit crimes in excess of
Why do you keep changing your story? In fact, if you actually KNEW
statistics, you would understand that these numbers are useless,
because they cannot be compared in like amounts. But that won't stop
you, will it? Because you don't really care, you just like being a
racist.
Matt
I haven't changed any story. When I said:
"If you remove the violent crimes comitted by blacks just in Detroit,
Michigan's violent crime stats fall to within just 2% of our neighbors to
the North, Ontario."
Didn't you figure out that I was talking about per-capita figures?
And the FACT is that blacks commit violent crimes in excess of four times
the rate as whites.
I'm pretty sure his friends appreciate him for being as smart and nice
as he is. Captain America isn't black, BTW. He's half German, half
Mexican. Wrap your head around that one.
You really are too stupid to understand percentages!??
What race are you Matt?
Neils
9:29 pm
04/17/2007
--
neilsthepoet
------------------------------------------------------------------------
neilsthepoet's Profile: http://bbs.whatpissesyouoff.com/member.php?userid=1268
View this thread: http://bbs.whatpissesyouoff.com/showthread.php?t=209049
Posted via Forum to Usenet Gateway at http://bbs.whatpissesyouoff.com
>
>No translation needed, fact is fact. Blacks commit crimes in excess of
>four times
>the rate as whites.
Which is of course irrelevant to whether a given crime is more likely
to have been committed by a black or a white. In fact it's
misleading.
It's not at all misleading. It's relevant to the demographics of any given
area. If you are in an area that is about 50/50 black/white, then you are
over four times as likely to be a victim of a black perp, than you are a
white. If you're in an area, such as downtown Detroit, the chance that a
violent crime committed against you was committed by a black perp approaches
100%. If you are in an all white area, then the opposite is true. In
order for there to be an even chance of your perp being white, or black,
then the demographics would be approximately 75% White, and 25% black.
Since the number of whites perpetrating violent crime is 1 in 1,000, and the
number of blacks perpetrating violent crime is 4.2 in 1,000, you are going
to be, on average, safer in an all white area, opposed to an all black area.
I mean, what are these numbers telling you?
>In News pr1b231go6uhg8d9j...@4ax.com,, David Johnston at
>da...@block.net, typed this:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:25:17 GMT, "Andrealphus"
>> <NOTAREA...@FAM.NET> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> No translation needed, fact is fact. Blacks commit crimes in
>>> excess of four times
>>> the rate as whites.
>>
>> Which is of course irrelevant to whether a given crime is more likely
>> to have been committed by a black or a white. In fact it's
>> misleading.
>
>It's not at all misleading. It's relevant to the demographics of any given
>area.
But not to whether a school spree killer is usually white. The
business disputes between drug dealers in slums aren't at all the same
thing as one of these guys who decides to go postal before committing
suicide.
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 03:42:58 GMT, "Andrealphus"
> <NOTAREA...@FAM.NET> wrote:
>
>> In News pr1b231go6uhg8d9j...@4ax.com,, David Johnston
>> at da...@block.net, typed this:
>>
>>> On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:25:17 GMT, "Andrealphus"
>>> <NOTAREA...@FAM.NET> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> No translation needed, fact is fact. Blacks commit crimes in
>>>> excess of four times
>>>> the rate as whites.
>>>
>>> Which is of course irrelevant to whether a given crime is more
>>> likely to have been committed by a black or a white. In fact it's
>>> misleading.
>>
>> It's not at all misleading. It's relevant to the demographics of
>> any given area.
>
> But not to whether a school spree killer is usually white. The
> business disputes between drug dealers in slums aren't at all the same
> thing as one of these guys who decides to go postal before committing
> suicide.
What has that to do with the fact that blacks are more likely to commit an
act of violence, by a factor of four, than whites? This last spree killer
was Asian.
What I was referring to was your original statement. Here it is for
you,
AGAIN:
> LOL! I say you're full of shit. The vast majority of murder and violent
> crime is black on black.
Of course, it isn't true.
>
> And the FACT is that blacks commit violent crimes in excess of four times
> the rate as whites.
Really. That's a fact is it? Want to try again?
The problem, kid, is that you are badly misusing statistics and
failing to understand the difference between raw numbers and numbers
that are scaled. Per capita numbers are worthless, because they tell a
very small part of the
story. Failing to realize you are wrong, and continuing the argument,
doesn't
make you look any smarter either.
Matt
Are you talking about the person who thought Reagan made a deal with the
Taliban?
> and nice
Are you talking about the guy who thought God and Allah were the same???
> as he is.
Yeah.....................
> Captain America isn't black, BTW. He's half German, half
> Mexican. Wrap your head around that one.
Holy Shit!
I didn't think that was genetically possible.
I thought all the Nazis hid out in south America after WWII...
Hahahhaha!!!!
>In News jr6b23977oumimktl...@4ax.com,, David Johnston at
>da...@block.net, typed this:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 03:42:58 GMT, "Andrealphus"
>> <NOTAREA...@FAM.NET> wrote:
>>
>>> In News pr1b231go6uhg8d9j...@4ax.com,, David Johnston
>>> at da...@block.net, typed this:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:25:17 GMT, "Andrealphus"
>>>> <NOTAREA...@FAM.NET> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No translation needed, fact is fact. Blacks commit crimes in
>>>>> excess of four times
>>>>> the rate as whites.
>>>>
>>>> Which is of course irrelevant to whether a given crime is more
>>>> likely to have been committed by a black or a white. In fact it's
>>>> misleading.
>>>
>>> It's not at all misleading. It's relevant to the demographics of
>>> any given area.
>>
>> But not to whether a school spree killer is usually white. The
>> business disputes between drug dealers in slums aren't at all the same
>> thing as one of these guys who decides to go postal before committing
>> suicide.
>
>What has that to do with the fact that blacks are more likely to commit an
>act of violence, by a factor of four, than whites?
What does that fact have to do with your claim that most crime is
black on black?
And AGAIN, I was talking about per-capita figures. Which, btw, show that
blacks are more than four times as likely to commit violent crimes.
Have you a rebuttal for that?
If you would note that in that same paragraph, I was talking about crime in
Michigan, which I compared to Ontario. It's a fact that most violent crime
in my area is black on black. Remove Detroit from the stats, and our
violent crime rate falls to within 2% of Ontario, Canada.
Sigh. Whatever you say, kid. You can believe that out of ever five
times you are a victim, it will be a black person that attacked you.
Because that is exactly what you just said.
Matt
> On Apr 18, 4:04 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
>> In News 1176903310.917961.106...@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com,, Matt
>> at matttel...@sprynet.com, typed this:
>>
>>> On Apr 17, 7:56 pm, "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAI...@FAM.NET> wrote:
>>
>>>> I haven't changed any story. When I said:
>>
>>>> "If you remove the violent crimes comitted by blacks just in
>>>> Detroit, Michigan's violent crime stats fall to within just 2% of
>>>> our neighbors to the North, Ontario."
>>
>>>> Didn't you figure out that I was talking about per-capita figures?
>>
>>> What I was referring to was your original statement. Here it is for
>>> you,
>>> AGAIN:
>>
>> And AGAIN, I was talking about per-capita figures. Which, btw, show
>> that blacks are more than four times as likely to commit violent
>> crimes.
>>
>> Have you a rebuttal for that?
>
> Sigh.
Okay, apparently not then.
Everybody in these groups knows you are and idiot,
but it does not need much brainpower to detect the
colour of a Korean