Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Romney Wants to INCREASE MILITARY SPENDING and REVERSE Obama's Cuts (Why -- plans on using it?)
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  8 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Annie Birdsong  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4 2012, 11:42 am
Newsgroups: alt.politics
From: Annie Birdsong <an...@anniebirdsong.info>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 08:42:18 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 4 2012 11:42 am
Subject: Romney Wants to INCREASE MILITARY SPENDING and REVERSE Obama's Cuts (Why -- plans on using it?)
             Romney: Increase Defense Spending – Reverse Obama’s Cuts

In the year 2012, the U.S. Defense Department spent $530 billion -- that's $1,095,403 per minute and $18,256 per second.

President Barack Obama cut $1 Trillion from defense, but Romney wants to increase the military budget by $2.3 trillion over 10 years.

Former President Jimmy Carter once said we spend about as much as the whole world put together on defense.

When we consider military spending, we also must figure in the interest on the debt caused by such high military expenses. When this is included, the United States spends 55 cents of every dollar on the military, according to Charles Hauss in his book "Comparative Politics: Domestic Responses to Global Challenges -- third edition."

It is very expensive to maintain a permanent war economy.

President Dwight D. Eisenhower once said, "The world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its labors, the genius of its scientists and the hope of its children."

Consider what was wasted in Iraq. The total budgetary and economic cost of the Iraq War was around $3 trillion when everything is figured in, including future retirement compensation, disability payments, replacing worn out equipment etc, according to Joseph Stiglitz, a Nobel Prize- winning economist at Columbia University, who was chairman of President Clinton's Council of Economic Advisers, senior-vice president and chief economist at the World Bank, and Linda J. Bilmes, an economist at Harvard University, who is an expert in government finance. She is a former assistant secretary and chief financial officer of the U.S. Department of Commerce.

If our brightest and best prepared minds ran our political parties -- our college professors -- rather than vested interests -- we probably would have spent that money -- more than 3 trillion -- ending the causes of war.

Stone Age:  Romney Speaks Out FOR Coal Burning Power Plant!

Mitt Romney, who is running for president,  has spoken out against "environmental extremism" that would keep us from utilizing our coal resources and other fossil fuels "to the fullest extent."

And in a debate, Romney said to Obama, "By the way, I like coal.  People in the coal industry think they are getting thrushed by your policies."

He is so out of touch with our environmentalists.

In a speech, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a powerful environnmental attorney, said:  

“The National Academy of Sciences published a five-year study that showed that every fresh water fish in America is now contaminated with mercury.  It's coming from coal burning power plants.

“This industry has essentially privatized all the fish in New York State in order to make themselves richer, they have stolen something from the public and made it so that we can't use it anymore.

“The constitution of New York says the fish belong to the people.  Everybody has a right to use them.

"Nobody can use them in a way that will diminsh or injure their use and enjoyment by others.  It's called the Public Trust Doctrine.

"It's 2,000 years old, it's in the Code of Jestinium, it's in the Magna Carta. ... It's in the constitution of every state.

"It applies to the waters and all the commons -- the fish, the water, the air, the public lands, wondering animals etc.

"According to the Centers for Disease Control, one out of every six women has so much mercury in her womb that her children are at risk for a grim inventory of diseases, including autism, blindness, mental retardation, heart, liver and kidney disease."

Kennedy, who fishes a lot and eats the fish, said tests reveal that he has 10 times what the Environmental Protection Agency considers to be safe.

He said Dr. David Carpenter, the national authority on mercury toxicity, told him that a woman with his level of mercury would have children cognitive impairment and permanent brain damage.

"I said to him she might have it," said Kennedy.  "No, no, no. The science is very certain today.  Her children would have some level of permanent neurological injury, probably, at my levels, an I.Q. loss of 5 to 7 points."

Below is a youtube video about people who had eaten fish contaminated with mercury in Minimata, Japan: BE ALARMED

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihFkyPv1jtU

MOTHER’S  need to RISE UP against coal mining!  We need solar and wind.

In Sweden, it is mother’s who go to the government complaining of the environmental pollution.  “We can not have it, “ they say.

Poisons accumulate in a woman’s body fat over the years and pass from her maternal cord blood to the young infant and from her breast milk to the baby. The body fat is tapped when breast milk is made.  

The babies are very vulnerable to pollutants because they are developing their bodies.

A wrong chemical signal can cause development to go awry.

We need to remake the way we make things using appropriate technologies.  This is one of the agendas of ecological economics – the right livelihood movement -- also called Buddhist economics.

COAL MINING AND OUR MOUNTAINS:

Another reason to be deeply alarmed by coal mining is that it is destroying our mountains.  

Below is an article I wrote on the need to protect MOUNTAINS:

If future generations are to have adequate water supplies, mountains must be carefully protected, for all of the world's major rivers and many of the smaller ones start off as streams in the mountains, according to the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO.

Mountains are up there in the clouds and get more rainfall than lower elevations.

There are various ways mountains produce water. In some places, water penetrates into a mountain and travels along the coal seam or along other rocks, then trickles out of the side of the mountain forming springs and streams.

In other places, water penetrates into mountains and is stored in huge natural storage tanks. For instance, in the Himalayan Mountains, these natural storage tanks are formed by cracks, fissures and dissolved areas within limestone rocks.

Enormous quantities of water from the Monsoon Rains get stored, which means there is water for the dry season. Water trickling out of these aquifers feeds thousands of springs and hundreds of streams, which pour enormous quantities of water into the great Ganges River and many other major rivers, according to Dr. Vandana Shiva.

Though limestone in the Himalayas plays a critical role in hydrology, it is being mined for use in the production of cement, steel, chemicals, sugar, textiles and other industries.

And in spite of the great hydrological importance of mountains, in the Appalachian Mountains, aquifers formed by coal and other rocks are being exploded by a coal mining technique called "mountaintop removal" that has blasted away the peaks of 500 mountains in just over a decade in the Appalachian Mountains.

About half of the mountain is removed.

Removing the coal seams removes the aquifers and replaces them with mine spoil, according to the National Research Council's Committee on Ground Water.

Furthermore, when the mountain tops are exploded, millions of tons of soil, rock and toxic heavy metals within the earth bury the streams in the valleys, impeding their flow to the rivers. These streams are permanently lost, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

since 1992, 2000 miles of streams have been buried due to surface mining in the United States, said Peter Harrison, who is with the Clean Energy Campaign with the WaterKeepers Alliance in New York, New York.

If you dry up the streams that feed our rivers and so other things that dry up the rivers, the country will become a desert. Indeed, our planet is drying up.

Also significant, the heavy metals in the mine spoil poisons the water with acid mine drainage so that the steams become dead -- fish can not live in them -- and the water is undrinkable.  (The acid rain from coal burning power plants change the mercury in the exposed rocks and soil to methyl mercury, which washes into the streams and rivers and is taken up by fish.)

Thousands of streams in the United States are dead, nothing can live, not only from acid mine drainage, but also from acid rain.

Dr. Nicholas Robinson, a professor at the Pace University School of Law, said, "Mountaintop removal has only been allowed in the United States. It hasn't been used in other countries."

A typical coal burning power plant burns through a train car load of coal every 12 hourse.

The typical American consumes about four tons of coal per person per year and nearly 700 pounds of metal, according to David Simpson, a professor of international policy at Johns Hopkins University.

Auto dependency has a great impact on mountains. For example, molybdenum, which is used in making high strength steel, occurs in "very very very low concentrations -- one percent, maybe. In order to get it, you pretty much have to grind up the entire mountain," said Dr. Anne Ehrlich, a biologist at Stanford University in Palo Alto, California. Yet molybdenan is just one of many metals used in making steel.

In the United States, One hundred thousand ore deposits have been mined and abandoned, according to Robin McCulloch, state mining engineer with the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology.

(Some abandoned mines may still contain resources that are not easily obtained and mining companies may go back in them at some point, according to McCulloch.)

(Technical note: two hundred thousand mines have been abandoned, but you might have two mines for one ore deposit, explained McCulloch, adding that a mine is just an opening.)

"We're seeing an end of many industrial minerals," he said, adding that a recent paper out of Yale University said even if we were doing 100 percent recycling, "we are short 30 percent of the mineral ...

read more »


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4 2012, 12:14 pm
Newsgroups: alt.politics, alt.politics.republican, alt.politics.conservative, talk.politics.misc, alt.conspiracy
From: MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE <ExPresid...@au.revoir.gov>
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 17:14:31 GMT
Local: Sun, Nov 4 2012 12:14 pm
Subject: Re: Romney Wants to INCREASE MILITARY SPENDING and REVERSE Obama's Cuts (Why -- plans on using it?)
Annie Birdsong

>              Romney: Increase Defense Spending – Reverse Obama’s Cuts

OBAMA policy made simple for LIBs.
CHOOSE OBAMA. GET BURKA. IT REALLY IS AS SIMPLE AS THAT.

http://www.strangepolitics.com/images/content/185528.gif
        OBAMUNISM:: WOMEN'S RIGHTS BURKA STYLE.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jope  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4 2012, 1:12 pm
Newsgroups: alt.politics, alt.politics.republican, alt.politics.conservative, talk.politics.misc, alt.conspiracy
From: Jope <jope...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 10:12:18 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 4 2012 1:12 pm
Subject: Re: Romney Wants to INCREASE MILITARY SPENDING and REVERSE Obama's Cuts (Why -- plans on using it?)
On Nov 4, 12:14 pm, MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE

<ExPresid...@au.revoir.gov> wrote:
> Annie Birdsong

> >              Romney: Increase Defense Spending Reverse Obama s Cuts

> OBAMA policy made simple for LIBs.
> CHOOSE OBAMA. GET BURKA. IT REALLY IS AS SIMPLE AS THAT.

> http://www.strangepolitics.com/images/content/185528.gif
>         OBAMUNISM:: WOMEN'S RIGHTS BURKA STYLE.

You do realize that Communism and Islam are incompatible.Try to inform
yourself .Please.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4 2012, 2:33 pm
Newsgroups: alt.politics, alt.politics.republican, alt.politics.conservative, talk.politics.misc, alt.conspiracy
From: MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE <ExPresid...@au.revoir.gov>
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 19:33:01 GMT
Local: Sun, Nov 4 2012 2:33 pm
Subject: Re: Romney Wants to INCREASE MILITARY SPENDING and REVERSE Obama's Cuts (Why -- plans on using it?)
Jope

> On Nov 4, 12:14 pm, MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE
>> Annie Birdsong

>> >              Romney: Increase Defense Spending Reverse Ob
> ama s Cuts

>> OBAMA policy made simple for LIBs.
>> CHOOSE OBAMA. GET BURKA. IT REALLY IS AS SIMPLE AS THAT.

>> http://www.strangepolitics.com/images/content/185528.gif
>>         OBAMUNISM:: WOMEN'S RIGHTS BURKA STYLE.

> You do realize that Communism and Islam are incompatible.

LIB reading comprehension notwithstanding,
Under OBAMUNISM, which do you think would prevail?

http://washingtonexaminer.com/photo/pid/2535859
http://www.strangepolitics.com/images/content/160688.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v620/ringo137/Barack_fawkes.jpg

        YES WE CAN! What you mean WE paleface?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jope  
View profile  
 More options Nov 4 2012, 8:29 pm
Newsgroups: alt.politics, alt.politics.republican, alt.politics.conservative, talk.politics.misc, alt.conspiracy
From: Jope <jope...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 17:29:58 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Nov 4 2012 8:29 pm
Subject: Re: Romney Wants to INCREASE MILITARY SPENDING and REVERSE Obama's Cuts (Why -- plans on using it?)
On Nov 4, 2:33 pm, MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE

Your motivations are dubious.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE  
View profile  
 More options Nov 5 2012, 8:25 am
Newsgroups: alt.politics, alt.politics.republican, alt.politics.conservative, talk.politics.misc, alt.conspiracy
From: MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE <ExPresid...@au.revoir.gov>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:25:46 GMT
Local: Mon, Nov 5 2012 8:25 am
Subject: Re: Romney Wants to INCREASE MILITARY SPENDING and REVERSE Obama's Cuts (Why -- plans on using it?)
(Denny) wrote

> MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE
>> Annie Birdsong
>> >              Romney: Increase Defense Spending – Reverse Obama’s Cuts

>> OBAMA policy made simple for LIBs.
>> CHOOSE OBAMA. GET BURKA. IT REALLY IS AS SIMPLE AS THAT.

>> http://www.strangepolitics.com/images/content/185528.gif
>>         OB
> wAMUNISM:: WOMEN'S RIGHTS BURKA STYLE.

> Would 2 trillion EXTRA defense dollars make you finally feel safe?

If it is Peace that you want it is DICTATORSHIP you must oppose.
If it is WAR that you wish to prevent it is the expropriation
   of private capital you must oppose.

WAR, in fact, is only possible when the wealth of the nation
   is held by its leaders rather than being rightly utilized
   by its citizens.

A Free and Productive people have nothing to gain from WAR,
  and, in fact, a great deal to lose.

OBAMA, the first $Billion presidential candidate, spent $1Billion/hour
   continuously for the first 100 days of his office guarenteeing a
   WAR beyond all historical precident.

To re-select OBAMA as Dictator is to set
in motion a holocaust on a global scale.

SUCH would not be Tolerated in a Society with a long memory.

LIBs. WHAT PRICE THEIR VISION?
---
http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/being-obama_591426.html
        Being Obama

What makes President Obama’s executive passivity so interesting is that it
seems to be a symptom not of policy uncertainty, but of personal
narcissism. The president is free to delegate the tasks of the president
because he’s already done the important job of simply showing up.

...
Bill Clinton’s vanity was that he wished he could have been at the center
of a world historical event. Barack Obama’s vanity is that he believes he
is a world historical event. And the greatness of his being dwarfs any
necessity to establish greatness through action. That’s why, despite his
passivity as president, we’re likely to see a much more vigorous Obama in
the coming months as he switches from governing to campaigning. However
ambivalent he may be about leading the country, arguing for the
indispensability of Barack Obama is the one project that has always
commanded his full attention.

History repeats itself, first as Tragedy (Clinton), then as FARCE (OBAMA).

    If a President of the United States
    ever lied to the American people he should resign.
        -- William J. Clinton, 1974

http://www.nypost.com/f/print/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/bam_benghaz...
8R3y5iHVbs3uurhjsiMjO
        OBAMA's BENGHAZI LIES.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE  
View profile  
 More options Nov 5 2012, 8:29 am
Newsgroups: alt.politics, alt.politics.republican, alt.politics.conservative, talk.politics.misc, alt.conspiracy
From: MANFRED the heat seeking OBOE <ExPresid...@au.revoir.gov>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:29:23 GMT
Local: Mon, Nov 5 2012 8:29 am
Subject: Re: Romney Wants to INCREASE MILITARY SPENDING and REVERSE Obama's Cuts (Why -- plans on using it?)
Jope

37/Barack_fawkes.jpg

>>         YES WE CAN! What you mean WE paleface?
> Your motivations are dubious.

And OBAMA's aren't? Typical LIB.

As wave after wave of Terror appear over the horizon
as did so many Luftwaffe during the Battle of Britain
LIBs not only deny their point of origin, Not Only demand
that we prosecute each pilot as an individual, BUT ALSO demand
that believe that their objective is unknowable even as LIBs urge
them on to their targets.

LIBs. What PRICE their Vision?
---
DEMAND TRUTH.
DESERVE PEACE.
DESERVE FREEDOM.
DEMAND COMPETANCE.
DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY.
DEFEAT LIB STRATEGIC INSANITY.

IT REALLY IS AS SIMPLE AS THAT.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
weheardthen...@aol.com  
View profile  
 More options Nov 5 2012, 8:44 am
Newsgroups: alt.politics
From: weheardthen...@aol.com
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 05:44:45 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Nov 5 2012 8:44 am
Subject: Re: Romney Wants to INCREASE MILITARY SPENDING and REVERSE Obama's Cuts (Why -- plans on using it?)

On Sunday, November 4, 2012 8:42:18 AM UTC-8, Annie Birdsong wrote:
> Romney: Increase Defense Spending – Reverse Obama’s Cuts

> In the year 2012, the U.S. Defense Department spent $530 billion -- that's $1,095,403 per minute and $18,256 per second.

Annie, did you really put a $10 million bounty on Dianne Feinstein?

...

read more »


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »