- funny video
Bush is used of ducking.
Dionysus
When's the walk-about so Bush can bath in the glory of a liberated
Iraqi people ?
--
web site at www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics
energy, education, politics, etc 1,552,396 document calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I can't wait for the next edition of Private Eye and HIGNFY:o)
Hands up all those who wanted it to be a grenade !
However I will give him credit for recently as good as admitting that
invading Iraq was a big mistake, although even then he did try to pass the
buck by saying that he acted on 'bad intelligence'..
Word!
What makes you think he isn't being tortured to death right now you
fucking brainless right wing fuck?
Why do you think he is angry, would you be MAN enough to hurl a shoe
at somebody who was responsible for
killing your neighbors little daughter? Wrecked your country?
Imprisoned and tortured your friend?
You fucking soulless jihadist pieces of shit
Ouch, that is the closest thing to justice that the Iraqis could ever
see, but that would never even come close to repairing the massive
damage that the jihadist (right-wing) US has done to Iraq.
And, do you really kiss your mother with that mouth? Which of her private
parts first?
Dionysus
Uh, I think, like, Saddam Hussein is, uh, like, uh, dead or
something!
Bush getting a shoe thrown at him pales in comparison to what Bush did
to Hussein!
Killing people is wrong
A fresh camel turd now...
A shoe is the ultimate insult in Islam...even dirtier than a camel turd
(according to them), but not as entertaining.
shame he wasn't allowed by protocol to throw them back...
i'll bet he's have won
regards
>Alang wrote:
Especially if it is a fresh camel turd
> Why do you think he is angry, would you be MAN enough to hurl a shoe
> at somebody who was responsible for
> killing your neighbors little daughter? Wrecked your country?
> Imprisoned and tortured your friend?
There is a great loss of face in the Muslim culture to have missed the
target. Especially twice. The thrower will be shunned now.
********
I did like President Bush's reaction to this juvenile display..."So what if
a guy threw his shoe at me?"
Now that's super-cool savior faire.
I ask again: Think that little son of a pig would have had the nerve to
throw his shoes at Sad Ham, The Insane? I think the little piglet picked his
target very carefully.
Dionysus
> Why do you think he is angry, would you be MAN enough to hurl a shoe
> at somebody who was responsible for
> killing your neighbors little daughter?
Except when Bill Clinton does it at Ruby Ridge, huh?
He would've been hustled out of the room and carried straight to
Saddam's lion cage where he'd be videotaped being consumed by several
starving lions.
He'd be fed through the bars.
Or incinerates innocent men,women and children at the Waco compound.
But, Bubba said the buck never got to him and Janet Reno fell on her
sword for the spineless douchebag.
Attorney General Reno had specifically directed that no pyrotechnic devices
be used in the assault.[28] Between 1993 and 1999, FBI spokesmen denied
(even under oath) the use of any sort of pyrotechnic devices during the
assault; however, pyrotechnic Flite-Rite CS gas grenades had been found in
the rubble immediately following the fire. In 1999, FBI spokesmen were
forced to admit that they had used the grenades, however they claimed that
these devices, which dispense CS gas through an internal burning process,
had been used during an early morning attempt to penetrate a covered,
water-filled construction pit 40 yards away,[28] and were not fired into the
building itself. According to FBI claims, the fires started approximately
three hours after the grenades had been fired.[28] When the FBI's documents
were turned over to Congress for an investigation in 1994, the page listing
the use of the pyrotechnic devices was missing.[28] The failure for six
years to disclose the use of pyrotechnics despite her specific directive led
Reno to demand an investigation.[28] A senior FBI official told Newsweek
that as many as 100 FBI agents had known about the use of pyrotechnics, but
no one spoke up until 1999.[28]
The Branch Davidians had given ominous warnings involving fire on several
occasions. [39] This may or may not be indicative of the Davidians' future
actions, but was the basis for the conclusion of Congress that the fire was
started by the Davidians, "absent any other potential source of ignition."
This was prior to the FBI admission that pyrotechnics were used, but a
yearlong investigation by the Office of the Special Counsel after that
admission nonetheless reached the same conclusion, and no further
congressional investigations followed.
On May 12, less than a month after the incident, Texas state authorities
bulldozed the site, rendering further gathering of forensic evidence
impossible.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waco_Siege#The_fire
"We did not use incenderary devices" - Janet Reno
"We did use incenderary devices" - Janet Reno
I predict voter regret within six months of B.O. taking office, the
Republicans re-taking Congress in two years, and B.O.'s bony ass
being kicked out in four...if he survives.
Check out left wing-nut blogs...it's already starting.
It's gonna be fun watching the implosion.
Dionysus
>
>
>
>> Except when Bill Clinton does it at Ruby Ridge, huh?
> ***********
> Ya zinged them again, Bill; good on you.
>
Well they just walk right in to it so I open the door for them!
Indeed :-)
>>> Killing people is wrong
>>>
>>> A fresh camel turd now...
>>
>>A shoe is the ultimate insult in Islam...even dirtier than a camel turd
>>(according to them), but not as entertaining.
>
> shame he wasn't allowed by protocol to throw them back...
> i'll bet he's have won
Fucking idiot.
Like classified documents fed through a paper shredder by Sandy
Bergler.
you're so dumb you'd'ave stuck it up your islamic nose
>
> He'd be fed through the bars.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
>Like classified documents fed through a paper shredder by Sandy
>Bergler.
Yea, and I thought only women stuffed.
Boo hoo. A bunch of white supremists got wasted. So sad.
Yeah, we should have let the whacko cult leader walk after he shot
that Fed.
> But, Bubba said the buck never got to him and Janet Reno fell on her
> sword for the spineless douchebag.
That's right, because the President of the USA is the one who oversees
an FBI raid. As opposed to say, the FBI.
I suppose the Branch Davidians were innocent parties in all of this.
Tell me, after the fire started, why didn't they, I don't know, RUN
OUTSIDE?
Dionysus
>
>
>
>
************
Pretty Celtic name, ugly use for it, though. So you don't value human life
when it is politically inexpedient, eh! How shallow of you.
Dionysus
***********
Hurricane Butch Reno said,"I take complete responsibility" for Waco, knowing
full well there'd be no consequences to her actions. Talk about
disingenuous, the hypocritical old bull dyke.
Dionysus
Would you be sobbing if it were The New Black Panthers??
You think they might've been intimidated by tanks with
flamethrowers,searchlights and guys with BIG GUNS ?? Yeah,if the adult
has an illegal weapon just set the building on fire and kill the women
and children too. Aren't you bedwetters the same ones that scream
bloody murder if a muslim jihadist gets waterboarded? STFU !!
Aren't you the same kook that ripped Bush for not flying into New
Orleans and taking over the Mayor and Governor's job the minute
Katrina was over?? I can just see you moonkooks giving Bush a pass if
he'd been CIC and pulled the Waco stunt like Bubba. LMMFAO !!
Sorry Dennis. That post was meant Sioban Mad(whatever his name is).
> "On a Clear Day" <doug...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:994382e4-1690-4bf7...@v39g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 14, 8:08 pm, squirlch...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > Why do you think he is angry, would you be MAN enough to hurl a shoe
> > at somebody who was responsible for
> > killing your neighbors little daughter? Wrecked your country?
> > Imprisoned and tortured your friend?
>
> There is a great loss of face in the Muslim culture to have missed the
> target. Especially twice. The thrower will be shunned now.
> ********
> I did like President Bush's reaction to this juvenile display..."So what if
> a guy threw his shoe at me?"
> Now that's super-cool savior faire.
I thought the best part was how he smirked at the tosser because he
ducked both attacks.
--
All saints have a past--all sinners have a future
Ronald Reagan
I don't value the lives of neo-nazis very highly, no.
The only one I feel sorry for is the dog.
Sobbing sarcastically, yes.
How about you? Would you be whining about it if it were the NBP?
The municipal and state governments aren't in charge of disaster
relief. The federal government is. Learn how your government works,
moron.
I can just see you moonkooks giving Bush a pass if
> he'd been CIC and pulled the Waco stunt like Bubba. LMMFAO !!
Yeah, and if my grandma had wheels she'd be a wagon. Your point?
Bush got off easy considering how many people he has killed over in
Iraq!
So much so they didn't remember that all they had to do was come up
with their hands up? They'd rather stay in and barbecue?
In that case, good riddance. And good for the genepool.
> Yeah,if the adult
> has an illegal weapon just set the building on fire
> and kill the women
> and children too.
I'm sorry, is this supposed to be coherent?
> Aren't you bedwetters the same ones that scream
> bloody murder if a muslim jihadist gets waterboarded? STFU !!
Torture is one thing. A bunch of whackjobs committing suicide is
another.
Clinton didn't incinerate anybody at Waco. David Koresh did it!
Those were Dionysus' racist homies!
Nor did Clinton point a gun in the direction of a little Cuban boys head
who made it to this country at the sacrifice of his mother. Come to
think of it, Clinton didn't throw him on a plane and send him back
either. LOL.
That was exactly the question I was gonna ask! Good for you, Siobhan!
Yeah, The Republitards wanna blame Clinton for everything. The blame
rests squarely with Koresh for holding hostages. Why didn't they all
run outside when they noticed the fire?
Dennis, we know how much you like to defend racism, so we fully
expected you would stick up for your racist gang!
Well if we can't blame Clinton for the Branch Davidians, and we we can't
blame Clinton for Ruby Ridge or the OKC bombing, how in the world do you
blame Bush for 911? Bush didn't fly the plane into the
towers--terrorist did.
Bill Gamelson wrote:
> <squir...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:9b6665cb-d160-497e...@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Why do you think he is angry, would you be MAN enough to hurl a shoe
> > at somebody who was responsible for
> > killing your neighbors little daughter?
>
> Except when Bill Clinton does it at Ruby Ridge, huh?
What the fuck does that have to do with IRAQ, and Clintons presidency
and some anti-government wackos that put their children in direct line
of their wacko paranoid anti-government views.
Fuck every one of you last anti-American right-wing jihadist pieces of
shit, you people never lifted one finger to keep bush in line. All you
cocksuckers did was, waaahhhh clinton wahhhhh clinton wahhhh clinton.
You people are irrelevant, reckless and destructive to 'our' country
but irrelevant none the less.
When is your next 'domestic' terrorist attack coming, when is your
next CULT going to test our LIBERAL government. So all you can play
the victims like you people always do.
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't
care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02
"I am truly not that concerned about him."
- G.W. Bush, repsonding to a question about bin Laden's whereabouts,
3/13/02 (The New American, 4/8/02)
I didn't say Bush flew the plane. He's not that talented! What I am
saying is the reason the planes flew into the towers is because Jeb
Bush got the courts to install Bush into the White House!
Ohhh. So now it's Jeb Bush's fault? The same Jeb that recused himself
during the recount in Florida? In the event you were asleep during the
debacle, the Florida courts favored Al Gore. It was the Supreme Court
that said Florida Courts could not create legislation that allowed
illegal recounts that went beyond the five days for the ballots to be
certified. You see, the Florida courts created legislation from the
bench, a no-no in our Republic. But I don't expect you to understand
this.
> I can just see you moonkooks giving Bush a pass if
>
> > he'd been CIC and pulled the Waco stunt like Bubba. LMMFAO !!
>
> Yeah, and if my grandma had wheels she'd be a wagon. Your point?- Hide quoted text -
Perhaps you should read the stories from the survivors instead of
getting your info from bumper stickers.
> All saints have a past--all sinners have a future
>
> Ronald Reagan- Hide quoted text -
You people are in for a HUGE surprise.
Remember, capitalism rewards the productive; socialism subsidizes the
indolent by enslaving the productive.
I fear for my republic.
Dionysus
>Boo hoo. A bunch of white supremists got wasted. So sad.
"Samuel Weaver, who was shot in the back while retreating,[
"Then, as Weaver, his 16-year-old daughter Sara, and Harris ran back toward
the house, Horiuchi took a second shot, which struck and wounded Harris, and
killed Vicki Weaver. Vicki Weaver was standing behind the door through which
Harris was entering the house, holding their 10-month-old baby Elishiba[10]
in her arms.[11] A Justice Department review later found the second shot was
unconstitutional and the lack of a request to surrender was "inexcusable",
since Harris and the two Weavers were running for cover and could not pose
an imminent threat. The task force also specifically blamed Horiuchi for
firing through the door, not knowing whether someone was on the other side
of it. While controversy exists as to who issued the orders that were being
followed by the sniper, the task force also condemned the so-called "rules
of engagement" allowing shots to be fired with no request for surrender"
http://www.answers.com/topic/ruby-ridge
Yea, so what? It happened during the Klintoon regime.
> Why do you think he is angry, would you be MAN enough to hurl a shoe
> at somebody who was responsible for
> killing your neighbors little daughter? Wrecked your country?
> Imprisoned and tortured your friend?
There is a great loss of face in the Muslim culture to have missed the
target. Especially twice. The thrower will be shunned now.
*********
Especially since he threw like a girl.
Dionysus
Bush wouldn't be gettin' shoes thrown at him if he hadn't started a
war based on lies!
And the shoe thrower wouldn't be able to conduct himself in such a way
if not for Bush giving him the freedom to do so without being put to
death. Imagine if Saddam had a guest speaking in Iraq and this reporter
hurled a shoe at him. He and his family would be tortured and put to
death.
You're an idiot! Saddam isn't even living anymore!
Maybe people wouldn't throw shit at Bush if he didn't kill people all
the time.
*************
"Past participle," Dung Beetle..."past participle."
Dionysus..
Sorry Dennis. That post was meant Sioban Mad(whatever his name is).
**********
No problem. Her name is Siobhan...beautiful Celtic name, ugly mis-use of it.
Dennis (another Celtic name, with Greco/Latin roots)
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That
is our bottom line." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We
want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass
destruction program." --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal
here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear,
chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest
security threat we face." --Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times
since 1983." --Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,
1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S.
Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate,
air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to
the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction
programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by: -- Democratic Senators
Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he
has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." -Rep. Nancy Pelosi
(D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
destruction and palaces for his cronies." -- Madeline Albright, Clinton
Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons
programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs
continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam
continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a
licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten
the United States and our allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by: --
Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate
of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e
means of delivering them." -- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in
power." -- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing
weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence
reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." -- Sen. Robert Byrd
(D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority
to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe
that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real
and grave threat to our security." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9,
2002
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively
to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the
next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated
the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass
destruction." -- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002
"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every
significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his
chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has
refused to do" -- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that
Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons
stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also
given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members
... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will
continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare,
and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." -- Sen. Hillary Clinton
(D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam
Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for
the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -- Sen. Bob
Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his
continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction
... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is
real..." -- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
"When I left office, there was a substantial amount of biological and
chemical material unaccounted for." -Bill Clinton on Larry King Live July,
2003
"What is at stake is how to answer the potential threat Iraq represents with
the risk of proliferation of WMD. Baghdad's regime did use such weapons in
the past. Today, a number of evidences may lead to think that, over the past
four years, in the absence of international inspectors, this country has
continued armament programs." -Jacques Chirac, October 16, 2002
"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in
1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a
warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those
trucks out." -Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003
"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our
allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam
Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available
means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already
used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build
more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons,
and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal." -John
Edwards, Oct 10, 2002
"I share the administration's goals in dealing with Iraq and its weapons of
mass destruction." -Dick Gephardt in September of 2002
"Over the years, Iraq has worked to develop nuclear, chemical and biological
weapons. During 1991 - 1994, despite Iraq's denials, U.N. inspectors
discovered and dismantled a large network of nuclear facilities that Iraq
was using to develop nuclear weapons. Various reports indicate that Iraq is
still actively pursuing nuclear weapons capability. There is no reason to
think otherwise. Beyond nuclear weapons, Iraq has actively pursued
biological and chemical weapons.U.N. inspectors have said that Iraq's claims
about biological weapons is neither credible nor verifiable. In 1986, Iraq
used chemical weapons against Iran, and later, against its own Kurdish
population. While weapons inspections have been successful in the past,
there have been no inspections since the end of 1998. There can be no doubt
that Iraq has continued to pursue its goal of obtaining weapons of mass
destruction." -Patty "Osama Mama" Murray, October 9, 2002
"Saddam's existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose a very
real threat to America, now. Saddam has used chemical weapons before, both
against Iraq's enemies and against his own people. He is working to develop
delivery systems like missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles that could bring
these deadly weapons against U.S. forces and U.S. facilities in the Middle
East." -John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002
"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and
our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two
decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction
through every available means. We know that he has chemical and
biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors
and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is
doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that
each day he gets closer to achieving that goal." -- Democratic
Presidential Hopeful Senator John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002
Kerry Called It Naive To The Point Of Grave Danger To Leave Saddam To
His Own Devices.It would be naive to the point of grave danger not to
believe that, left to his own devices, Saddam Hussein will provoke,
misjudge, or stumble into a future, more dangerous confrontation with
the civilized world. (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record, 10/9/02,
p. S10171)
Kerry Said Threat Of Saddam Hussein With Weapons Of Mass Destruction
Is Real.The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction
is real, but as I said, it is not new. It has been with us since the
end of that war, and particularly in the last 4 years we know after
Operation Desert Fox failed to force him to reaccept them, that he has
continued to build those weapons. He has had a free hand for 4 years
to reconstitute these weapons, allowing the world, during the
interval, to lose the focus we had on weapons of mass destruction and
the issue of proliferation. (Sen. John Kerry, Congressional Record,
10/9/02, p. S10171)
"I will be voting to give the president of the United States the
authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein
because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass
destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our
security." -- John F. Kerry
(This was before he voted against it.)
"Saddam's existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose
a very real threat to America, now. Saddam has used chemical weapons
before, both against Iraq's enemies and against his own people. He
is working to develop delivery systems like missiles and unmanned
aerial vehicles that could bring these deadly weapons against U.S.
forces and U.S. facilities in the Middle East." -- John Rockefeller,
Oct 10, 2002
"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his
weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and
nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In
addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless
using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles
that will threaten the United States and our allies."
-Letter to President Bush, signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL) and
others, Dec, 5, 2001
"[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to
his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass
destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass
destruction
is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
Kerry Said Saddam Hussein's WMD Are A Threat.I think Saddam
Hussein's weapons of mass destruction are a threat, and that's why I voted
to hold him accountable and to make certain that we disarm him. I think we
need to (NPR's All Things Considered, 3/19/03)
January 2003
Kerry Said, If You Don't Believe Saddam Hussein Is A Threat With
Nuclear Weapons, Then You Shouldn't Vote For Me. (Ronald Brownstein,
On Iraq, Kerry Appears Either Torn Or Shrewd, Los Angeles Times,
1/31/03)[/quote]
I took his advise and voted for Bush.
Dionysus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Yes, I can see how a crazed cultist would make for a more reliable
witness.
Because Clinton didn't get a memo telling him that Al Qaeda members
were taking flying lessons, and then ignore it.
After he appointed partisan Katherine Harris to be the state's Chief
Electoral Officer.
> In the event you were asleep during the
> debacle, the Florida courts favored Al Gore. It was the Supreme Court
> that said Florida Courts could not create legislation that allowed
> illegal recounts that went beyond the five days for the ballots to be
> certified. You see, the Florida courts created legislation from the
> bench, a no-no in our Republic. But I don't expect you to understand
> this.
>
Funny you should bring up Jeb Bush. Jeb Bush authored an article once
call "Deinventing Government", in which he suggests that the best way
to break Americans from the "addiction" of government is to "create a
financial crisis", thereby forcing Americans to turn to private
enterprise to run the country.
Didn't quite work out like they planned, did it?
In case you haven't heard, the election's over, shithead.
An urban myth.
>The Governor has control of the
> National Guard and should be held accountable for them not being
> prepared.
No, idiot. The National Guard is a FEDERAL organization. Which is
why half of them wound up in Iraq.
The governor can call in the Guard, but it's the federal government's
responsibility to make sure it's able to respond when it is.
>Nice try.
There isn't a city or state that has anywhere near the resources to
deal with a catastrophe like Katrina, idiot. Only the federal
government has the resources to handle something like this.
And it wasn't the state or the municipal government that denied the
funds to strengthen the levies, now was it?
>Lets see how your Messiah handles natural
> disasters. We'll be watching and just as critical of him as you kooks
> have been of Bush.
>
Oooooooooo, we're soooooo scared.
>> The Governor has control of the
>> National Guard and should be held accountable for them not being
>> prepared.
>
> No, idiot. The National Guard is a FEDERAL organization. Which is
> why half of them wound up in Iraq.
As such, they CANNOT be the "State Militia" mentioned in the second
amendment of the US Constitution. As such, all federal laws limiting the
private ownership of arms, or the requirement for a tax upon them, are
unconstitutional. All such limits should be left up to the state, for it
is up to the state to define, and regulate it's own militia.
The National Guard is a government military organization, idiot. Last
time I checked, the military was already exempt from gun control
laws. Fuck, you're stupid.
Maybe you should read a little slower so you can properly respond.
Your brain is a past participle.
Bush should be in prison for killing so many innocent people, and all
the survivors of the people he has killed should come to the prison
every day and throw shoes at him!
You just don't get it! Let me try to explain it to you. That shoe-
thrower guy, you see, is pissed off at Bush for killing so many Iraqi
people.
And I'll explain it to you: The shoe throwing guy is a fine example of
what Bush and the United States has been able to accomplish; give people
like this clown the freedom to express his sentiments freely. Like Joe
the Plumber, the shoe thrower is making a name for himself in Iraq and
is likely to have a fine following. And while the shoe thrower has
negative feelings towards our President, the other reporters who tackled
him do not. What about their feelings Mack? I only seen one shoe
thrower Mack, how many did you see in that room?
It's not even worth it for me to tell you the truth because YOU CAN'T
HANDLE THE TRUTH!
You are a bloodthirsty warmonger, and you just love war, and you
would love for the war to go on for eternity. KILL, KILL KILL KILL
KILL FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT
Fuckface: The liberals argue that the second amendment talks about a
state militia rather then the people, yes? And furthermore, they insist
that the militia referenced IS the National Guard. However, as pointed
out above, they are a FEDERAL organization, not a state one.
So, asshole, that means that their argument falls apart, and the National
Guard cannot possibly be the militia referenced in the second amendment.
So, asshole, that means that according to the 10th amendment, a state has
exclusive authority to define it's militia any way it deems necessary.
So, asshole, that means that all federal gun regulations are
unconstitutional. All "regulation" to ensure proper functionality and
training, is reserved to the respective states.
That's ok though, I forgive YOUR stupidity.
> >
> > > You just don't get it! Let me try to explain it to you. That shoe-
> > > thrower guy, you see, is pissed off at Bush for killing so many Iraqi
> > > people.
> >
> > And I'll explain it to you: The shoe throwing guy is a fine example of
> > what Bush and the United States has been able to accomplish; give people
> > like this clown the freedom to express his sentiments freely. Like Joe
> > the Plumber, the shoe thrower is making a name for himself in Iraq and
> > is likely to have a fine following. And while the shoe thrower has
> > negative feelings towards our President, the other reporters who tackled
> > him do not. What about their feelings Mack? I only seen one shoe
> > thrower Mack, how many did you see in that room?
> >
> > --
> > All saints have a past--all sinners have a future
> >
> > Ronald Reagan- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> It's not even worth it for me to tell you the truth because YOU CAN'T
> HANDLE THE TRUTH!
> You are a bloodthirsty warmonger, and you just love war, and you
> would love for the war to go on for eternity. KILL, KILL KILL KILL
> KILL FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT
Isn't it a pity I'm on the other side of you with that attitude?
Well you and yours can keep those dark shaded sun glasses on and sniff
flowers until your nose bleeds. If not for the KILL, KILL,KILL people,
you wouldn't be here today enjoying the freedoms of our country others
in different parts of this world can only dream of.
>You just don't get it! Let me try to explain it to you. That shoe-
>thrower guy, you see, is pissed off at Bush for killing so many Iraqi
>people.
Really! Gosh and I thought he was still mad at Bill Clinton for blowing up
his hard working daughter at that aspirin factory in Sudan!
>
> And I'll explain it to you: The shoe throwing guy is a fine example of
> what Bush and the United States has been able to accomplish; give people
> like this clown the freedom to express his sentiments freely. Like Joe
> the Plumber, the shoe thrower is making a name for himself in Iraq and
> is likely to have a fine following. And while the shoe thrower has
> negative feelings towards our President, the other reporters who tackled
> him do not. What about their feelings Mack? I only seen one shoe
> thrower Mack, how many did you see in that room?
>
I thaw thoo!
LOL! Hey Ray, I think you got him.
>Your brain is a past participle.
If brains were gunpowder, you wouldn't have enough to blow your nose.
And there were no windows!!
If the warmongers hadn't killed so many people there would be more
people here to appreciate our country.
Clinton didn't blow that guys daughter, Jesusfugginchrist!
If shit was a nuclear bomb you would be dangerous 'cause you're full
of it!
>If the warmongers hadn't killed so many people there would be more
>people here to appreciate our country.
Oh well gee whiz, if life was like the Brady Bunch we wouldn't need guns.
> >You just don't get it! Let me try to explain it to you. That shoe-
> >thrower guy, you see, is pissed off at Bush for killing so many Iraqi
> >people.
>
> Really! Gosh and I thought he was still mad at Bill Clinton for blowing up
> his hard working daughter at that aspirin factory in Sudan!
>Clinton didn't blow that guys daughter, Jesusfugginchrist!
LOL! You get so upset when someone does what you do to them!
Oh now which one of those required the less thinking?
Sorry, I didn't take gun nutese as a second language.
> Sorry....
You surely are.
Snicker.
Don't you start; he just might start typing that way. :--?
I do in most cases. Half the time he realizes it, the other half of the
time he doesn't.
True, and they would be living in government houses where three families
occupy a two bedroom home, and they would be working for the government
seven days a week with no bathroom breaks.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Now hold on a minute, wait wait wait wait wait! Just because there
was only one shoe thrower in that room does not mean there were not
other people in that room who wouldn't throw shoes at Bush. It
doesn't mean that everybody loves Bush. If that particular shoe
thrower guy hadn't been there someone else probably would have done
the deed!