Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

~~I think female Pro-Lifers should

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Lucile Wilson

unread,
Nov 14, 2004, 2:26:33 PM11/14/04
to
I think female pro lifers should be willing to have the fetus that is about to
be aborted, transplanted into their womb so they could keep a baby alive. Then
they could put it up for adoption. This could easily be done. A man in Italy
gave birth to a baby that had been implanted in his abdomen. The fetus was
nourished from the mans intestines. If that could happen, then the pro lifers
would be able to act on their idea that no baby should be aborted. They would
be doing a good thing.

"To thine own self be true." Shakespeare"


Scott

unread,
Nov 14, 2004, 2:38:37 PM11/14/04
to

"Lucile Wilson " <msl...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041114142633...@mb-m01.aol.com...

Once again you show that you're the dumbest female on the planet.

The moral of this story is that no matter what label "abortion rights
advocates" wish to use, we in the pro-life camp should still be wary, since
abortion is not, in the words of Shakespeare, "a deed without a name." For
just as a rose would smell as sweet by any other name, even so abortion is
murder by any other name.

DGH


Lucile Wilson

unread,
Nov 14, 2004, 2:57:57 PM11/14/04
to
>Once again you show that you're the dumbest female on the planet.
>
>The moral of this story is that no matter what label "abortion rights
>advocates" wish to use, we in the pro-life camp should still be wary, since
>abortion is not, in the words of Shakespeare, "a deed without a name." For
>just as a rose would smell as sweet by any other name, even so abortion is
>murder by any other name.
>
>DGH

Once again You show no imagination. Since the thing could be accomplished, you
pro-lifers would being saving life and there would be no murder. But the whole
thing is...you want to be able to go around calling people murderers. Think
about the 11th commandment Jesus gave us..."Love one another and I have loved
you."

bvoiced

unread,
Nov 14, 2004, 3:15:10 PM11/14/04
to
In article <zcWdnd0uQZK...@intertex.net>,
"Scott" <sc...@telelocty.com> wrote:

Hey Scott, you just want to inspect my wife's womb, dontcha. Have you
considered online porn. This may just take the pressure off. Most of
the women I've spoken to in the last hour (the ones who've read your
post) really don't want you to look at, discuss, or give them orders
about what's between their legs. I mean, I've offered to let you take
over their health care but they just don't seem interested. Do you pray
in leather while holding a whip?

Frank Dwyer

unread,
Nov 14, 2004, 7:01:36 PM11/14/04
to
Scott wrote:

It's only murder if you make up a new definition for the word.

Scotius

unread,
Nov 16, 2004, 1:59:51 AM11/16/04
to
On 14 Nov 2004 19:26:33 GMT, msl...@aol.com (Lucile Wilson ) wrote:

>I think female pro lifers should be willing to have the fetus that is about to
>be aborted, transplanted into their womb so they could keep a baby alive.

The problem with your "logic" is that no one forced the dumb
sluts who have 5 kids with 5 fathers out of wedlock to fuck in the
first place. If anyone had, no one would object to them having an
abortion. Personally, I think abortion is not right, but I'd never say
a woman shouldn't have one if she had been raped, since it may affect
her mental health for the rest of her life if she had to have it.
Likewise I would not expect a woman who was in physical danger to have
to go ahead and have a baby.
As regards abortion for women who don't need an "excuse", I'm
fine with it and I think most people probably are. There is a
"however" here though. Regarding the last, however; I do NOT believe
that abortion should be available on demand for any girl who wants one
at any time simply because she was too fucking stupid to use birth
control or even a condom (preferrably both).
Lastly, I find it odd (and more than a bit hypocritical) that
the same crowd who insists that abortion on demand must be legal was
the crowd who introduced their idea of sex education into American
schools in the '70s with the promise that it would lower teen
pregnancy rates. Everyone sensible (the "unsensible right wing" to
them of course) said it wouldn't work, etc, but they had to have their
way. Now they want to allow irresponsibility to a greater degree
because their first great idea didn't work out so well.

Message has been deleted
0 new messages