NO MAN LEFT BEHIND

[DGVREIMAN]

NO MAN LEFT BEHIND

(This is not a copyrighted article - you may reply at alt.war.Vietnam)

Sure, right - one word sums up the true meaning of "No Man Left
Behind" under the auspices of the Obama administration:

"BENGHAZI!"

It's a sad day when the long standing rule and promise of our Armed
Forces is arrogantly betrayed.

Consider also the Benghazi compound was attacked TWICE before the
9/11/12 murders occurred - and what did the Obama administration do?
Of course - it REDUCED security at that compound instead of increasing
it!

DUHHHHHHHHHH.

Next week you can voice your opinion about this issue and others.

Please vote.

Please do not simply vote your Race nor your Gender like the drooling
idiots do, but instead vote your conscience. Vote for the future
direction you want America to take for you and your Children and Grand
Children.

Regardless of whom you vote for, VOTE!

Doug Grant (Tm)

[DGVREIMAN]

"Dai Uy" <Dai...@hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:2933c57f-e986-4a05...@googlegroups.com...

On Sunday, October 28, 2012 10:58:35 AM UTC-10, Dietz wrote:

> Consider also the Benghazi compound was attacked TWICE before the
> 9/11/12 murders occurred - and what did the Obama administration do?
> Of course - it REDUCED security at that compound instead of
> increasing
> it!
>

The neocon supporters of the Romney camp are portraying the
Benghazi consulate attack as the result of "perceived American
weakness" in the Middle East. Here are a few attacks on US
consulates and embassies in the Middle East during the Bush
Administration after 9/11:

Doug Says:

Mr. Rau, so is President Bush to blame for the Benghazi debacle?
Weeeeooooooo. It doesn't matter what happened under President Bush's
watch. The Benghazi debacle has nothing to do with the former
President Bush, no more than President Bush had anything to do with
the first attack on the World Trade Center and the refusal of the
Clinton administration to take into custody Osama Bin Laden!

The failure of the Obama administration in respect to Benghazi was not
the fact it was attacked. I have posted dozens of times that it is
impossible to defend all targets from terrorism. It is like swating
Mosquitoes - the swamp from which they are spawend provides a never
ending supply of Mosquitoes. The only solution to an infestation of
Mosquitoes or radical Islamic terrorists is to "drain the swamp." In
the case of radical Islam, the "swamp" is clearly Iran.

So the attack itself was not an issue - refusing to send help to the
men that were under attack IS an issue, so is the refusal of the Obama
administration to beef up security in Benghazi even after the compound
was attacked two times - and what is even worse, pulling the security
out AFTER the compound was attacked twice!

Not to mention the desperate multiple cables the Ambassador sent to
the Obama Administration (the last one early on 911) begging for
additional security, explaining that his position was dangerous,
explaining the Libyans could not protect him, explaining that several
attacks had already occurred against other Ambassadors (the UK was
smart enough to pull their Ambassador out) and regardless of all the
cables, and requests, the Obama administration PULLED the security
from the compound! DUHHHHHHH! Do you somehow think all that is
President Bush's fault?
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Then even after all of the failures mentioned above, when the
compound was attacked, and the men under attack begged for help, the
Obama administration refused to send any help although the attack
lasted seven hours, and the next day President Obama went to Vegas to
raise money for his re-election!

And if all that is not enough, President Obama's spokespersons said
subsequent to the attack, and with the absolute knowledge they were
lying as President Obama said during the debate he knew it was a
terrorist attack all along, but all of his spokespersons tried to
spin the attack was NOT a pre-planned attack but was a spontaneous
attack due to some obscure video posted on the Internet. Dodge and
duck, duck and dodge!

Instead of fessing up to the obvious failures in respect to this
issue, the spin went out from the Obama administration stating the
Benghazi attack was all due to some unforseen "spontaneous
demonstration that went haywire." Sure, right - and it just happened
to occur on the 9/11 date. Yep, if you believe that I am sure you are
the next buyer of the GW Bridge.

To add even more disgusting hype to this issue, the FBI secured the
video of the attack in Benghazi, and now, due to the insistence of the
Obama Administration, the video has been classified as "Top Secret"
and will not be released to the public until AFTER the election!

Mien Gott Herr Rau, wake up and smell the bullshit burning!

Snip inapplicable previous attacks on the Bush watch. . . Bush had
nothing to do with Benghazi.

So did those attacks (and the 9/11/, NY, DC, and PA ones, for
that matter) happen because of what Romney is now saying to be
"perceived American weakness"? Where was your outrage directed in
those cases Doug? At Bush, or the terrorists?

> DUHHHHHHHHHH.

***

Doug Says: Mr. Rau, the fact the Ambassador asked for more security,
and the fact the compound was attacked twice before the 911 murders,
represent the key issues to the Romney statement about "American
Weakness" - the Obama Administration CUT THE SECURITY after these two
events had occurred. Moreover, when the compound was attacked the
Obama administration refused to send help! Had the same happened
during President Bush's watch the press would have crucified him.
Impeached him, ran him out of D.C. on a rail!

But the press is all but quiet about the Benghazi debacle, all except
Fox. Gosh, I wonder why?

Accept the fact that President Obama's staff fucked up. Accept the
fact they tried to spin it to their favor by hiding the fact they knew
the attack was a pre-planned attack designed to occur on 911 and had
NOTHING to do with any video or spontaneous demonstration. Had
President Obama simply accepted the blame for the fiasco, it would
have been long behind him now. . . but with each new day there is some
new outrage - the latest is the order to make the video top secret so
it cannot be viewed by the public until AFTER THE ELECTION!~which is
what this is all about.

Doug Grant (Tm)

Doug Grant (Tm)

[DGVREIMAN]

"Dai Uy" <Dai...@Hawaii.rr.com> wrote in message
news:085ff7a6-8109-4241...@qi10g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

On Oct 28, 6:00 pm, "DGVREIMAN" <dgvrei...@comcast.net> wrote:

> So did those attacks (and the 9/11/, NY, DC, and PA ones, for
> that matter) happen because of what Romney is now saying to be
> "perceived American weakness"? Where was your outrage directed in
> those cases Doug? At Bush, or the terrorists?
>
> > DUHHHHHHHHHH.

Mr. Rau, the 09/11/01 attacks did not involve notices sent to the
White House for months stating that a specific attack was about to
happen at a specific place like Benghazi did. Moreover, Al Qaeda has
grown since Obama took over, it was cut to shreds during the Bush
administration.

No doubt there were many mistakes involving Al Qaeda prior to the
Obama administration - President Clinton refusing to take Obama into
custody when he was offered by the Saudi's is one example, but
regardless of history, we are talking and addressing the failures of
the Obama administration in respect to radical Islamic terrorism.

His policy was appeasement, and that resulted in unprecedented
growth of Al Qaeda in Iraq after he pulled out our troops, and a
complete loss in Afghanistan, and Al Qaeda going into and building
camps in dozens of other nations since Obama took office. Obviously,
neither Clinton's nor Bush's nor Obama's foreign policy stopped the
radical Islamic terrorists from attacking America when they got the
chance - under the Bush Presidency, they did not get the chance after
911. Under Obama, they got the chance and they took it. Al Qaeda is
growing faster now than ever before, and that is a direct result of
the Obama appeasement and apology policies.

These politically correct wars are not succeeding.

Doug Grant (Tm)

Doug Grant (Tm)

Doug Grant (Tm)