Last Night's '60 Minuets' Loon Ass-Kiss Fest!

[wolfagain]

Had the sound off like most of us Right Thinking Patriot Americans do
often when DISTURBING images suddenly appear on our TV screens, but
did observe the following:
Obama was flashing his patented "Watermellon Grin" often..and
throughly enjoying all the FAWNING and SLOBERING by CBS's top
"Investagating" reporter...While Hillary was Clucking like an old hen
who just laid the Golden Egg!...and accepting with delight all the
Mutual Ass Kissing between her and the Colored Boy sharing the
spotlight. Reports surfacing today that many of Obama's Dupes watching
the Love-Fest were so overcome by their emotions many uncontrolably
wee-wee'd all over themselves. Can you say "Emmy Award?"

[Sid9]

"wolfagain" <wo...@provide.net> wrote in message
news:75d0ea4c-b2ef-4e28...@b11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

.
.

Sour grapes!

[Wayne]

"wolfagain" wrote in message
news:75d0ea4c-b2ef-4e28...@b11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...

# Had the sound off like most of us Right Thinking Patriot Americans do
# often when DISTURBING images suddenly appear on our TV screens, but
# did observe the following:
# Obama was flashing his patented "Watermellon Grin" often..and
# throughly enjoying all the FAWNING and SLOBERING by CBS's top
# "Investagating" reporter...While Hillary was Clucking like an old hen
# who just laid the Golden Egg!...and accepting with delight all the
# Mutual Ass Kissing between her and the Colored Boy sharing the
# spotlight. Reports surfacing today that many of Obama's Dupes watching
# the Love-Fest were so overcome by their emotions many uncontrolably
# wee-wee'd all over themselves. Can you say "Emmy Award?"

The interview was interesting in that it revealed what everybody had
expected.
BJ Clinton dropped his long time, unhidden hatred of Obama right before the
election.
BJ then vigorously campaigned on behalf of Obama.

Why? It was obvious.
Obama made a deal with BJ that in 2016 Obama would throw the entire weight
of the Obama organization behind Hillary in her white house bid.

The interview last night confirmed it.

[Sid9]

"Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:ke6b9n$5fp$1...@dont-email.me...

Damn...he's still hallucinating!

[Wayne]

"Sid9" wrote in message news:ke6c1m$6av$1...@dont-email.me...

# Damn...he's still hallucinating!

OK, Sid. Give us one reasonable alternative explanation for BJ's sudden
change of heart.

[Barb May]

That's a possible scenario, but if there was such a deal it would not
include Obama backstabbing Biden in such an obvious manner. However,
Biden may not compete if Hillary decides she wants the nomination.



--
Barb

[Professor Bubba]

In article <ke6fqi$646$1...@dont-email.me>, Barb May

I don't think Biden wants it in the first place. That changes if he
succeeds to office for some reason.

[Bob]

Biden won't run. That bumbling boob would guarantee a Republican win.

[Sid9]

"Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in message

news:ke6eb0$8q1$2...@dont-email.me...

.
.
One reason, the best reason:
Whut ya sees is whut ya gets!


All you do is sit around creating your ridiculous conspiracy theories.
Go back to your birth certificate fantasy. it was more amusing.

[Wayne]

"Sid9" wrote in message news:ke6jmn$f1u$1...@dont-email.me...

# One reason, the best reason:
# Whut ya sees is whut ya gets!


# All you do is sit around creating your ridiculous conspiracy theories.
# Go back to your birth certificate fantasy. it was more amusing.

The Clinton hatred of Obama is not a fantasy. In fact it was B.J. Clinton
who referred to Obama as a fairy tale.
So how do you explain the change in attitude, just before the election?

[wolfagain]

2 axe handles wide Ass JOWLES Hillary? not likely....

[Capt. Justice]

Not enough botox or face-lifts
available to hide that wilted face of
hers...and did ya take a good look
at that hair-do she wore to the
Bengazhi hearings looks like she
just got up and raked a few strokes
through her dyed blonde hair. Poor
old gal, she's falling down so much
these days, it's a wonder she didn't
miss her chair.
And her mind, or hysteria, is
getting even worse, The final stroke
was when she declared "What
difference does it make" with her
arms waving frantically in the air.

[RichA]

Hard to believe all the lovey-dovey stuff when he FIRED her.

[clairbear]

"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in news:ke6afu$4h2$1...@dont-email.me:

Nope just the opinion of a lot of rational Americans

[clairbear]

"Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in
news:ke6mmd$ici$1...@dont-email.me:

>
>
> "Sid9" wrote in message news:ke6jmn$f1u$1...@dont-email.me...
>
>
> "Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:ke6eb0$8q1$2...@dont-email.me...
>>
>>
>> "Sid9" wrote in message news:ke6c1m$6av$1...@dont-email.me...
>>
>>
>> "Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in message
>> news:ke6b9n$5fp$1...@dont-email.me...
>>>
>>>
>>> "wolfagain" wrote in message

>>> news:75d0ea4c-b2ef-4e28-89eb-689a7ec6b747
@b11g2000yqh.googlegroups.co

It is simple Clinton speaks out of both sides of his ass He is like sid
a DNC shill

[Wayne]

"wolfagain" wrote in message
news:d056b787-ba88-43f4...@w3g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...

# 2 axe handles wide Ass JOWLES Hillary? not likely....

Well, if the dems just HAVE to run a woman candidate, she looks better than
most of the liberal dem women. At least she beats Pelosi.

[Sid9]

"Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote in message

news:ke7eks$231$1...@dont-email.me...

You should know a woman age 72 that looks that good!

[Tom]

Cite, foreigner?

Tom

[Tom]

On Jan 28, 12:39 pm, Professor Bubba <bu...@nowhere.edu.invalid>
wrote:
> In article <ke6fqi$64...@dont-email.me>, Barb May

Agreed. He'll be 74 in 2016.

Tom

[Wayne]

"Capt. Justice" wrote in message
news:14361-510...@storefull-3252.bay.webtv.net...

But you forget that the MSM gets stiffies every time her name is mentioned.
They would do anything to get her elected.

[Tom]

Who among the Republicans can beat her, wolfturd?

Her favorability rating is 67%. Name a Republican with poll numbers
close to hers.

Tom

[Wayne]

"Sid9" wrote in message news:ke7h1n$k3c$1...@dont-email.me...

# You should know a woman age 72 that looks that good!

I do know several who look much better.
Besides that HRC has been coyote ugly all the way back into her 20s.
And she's 66, looking like 72.

[Professor Bubba]

In article
<b58f42dc-7d59-49b3...@u20g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,

Abraham Lincoln. But that's about it.

[Hell Stomper]

On Jan 28, 11:50 am, wolfagain <w...@provide.net> wrote:

At least MSNBC and Fox News don't pretend that they are unbiased.
Watch a few minutes of either and you will know where they stand. The
old big three TV networks, along with CNN OTOH, have become extensions
of the white house press corps. Journalism is dead in America.

[Charles H. Sampson]

Hell Stomper <stardu...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> At least MSNBC and Fox News don't pretend that they are unbiased.

I thought Fox was the one that claimed to be Fair and Balanced.

Charlie
--
Nobody in this country got rich on his own. You built a factory--good.
But you moved your goods on roads we all paid for. You hired workers we
all paid to educate. So keep a big hunk of the money from your factory.
But take a hunk and pay it forward. Elizabeth Warren (paraphrased)

[Dano]

"Charles H. Sampson" wrote in message
news:1kxgbzb.1lfdv62a1qfldN%csam...@inetworld.net...

Hell Stomper <stardu...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> At least MSNBC and Fox News don't pretend that they are unbiased.

I thought Fox was the one that claimed to be Fair and Balanced.

==========================================

That would be consistent with their "lie about everything you can get away
with" policy.

Their faithful viewers believe everything they hear from them anyway.

[Tom]

On Jan 29, 12:55 am, Professor Bubba <bu...@nowhere.edu.invalid>
wrote:
> In article
> <b58f42dc-7d59-49b3-856a-88ce20d61...@u20g2000yqo.googlegroups.com>,

Nicely done!

Maybe Dwight Eisenhower, too, but he'd be called a socialist by the
teabaggers nowadays.

Tom

[Tom]

Fox News ALWAYS pretends they are unbiased... fair and balanced,
anyone?

Tom

[Spokane Social Club]

On 1/29/2013 11:26 AM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>> I thought Fox was the one that claimed to be Fair and Balanced.

> That's true.
>
> Faux claims it is absolute truthful "news"---despite arguing in court
> that it is NOT a news channel---but entertainment.

And ABC, CBS, and NBC are also "entertainment" channels, so?

> MSNBC does have to abide by Network journalistic standards---meaning
> they cannot deliberately lie about actual events.

Utter sophistry, they can do as they please.

> If they make a mistake in reporting--they are bound by Corporate rules to rescind the
> statements, and if grevious enough--they are terminated.

Care to state these "corporate rules"?

A cite would be useful.

> No such standards exist at Faux snooze.
>
> NONE.

Really?

http://www.newscorp.com/corp_gov/sobc.html

http://www.newscorp.com/corp_gov/politicalactivities.html

I think you're lying.

[Bob]

On 1/29/2013 12:26 PM, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:08:09 -0800, csam...@inetworld.net (Charles H.
> Sampson) wrote:
>
>> Hell Stomper <stardu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> At least MSNBC and Fox News don't pretend that they are unbiased.
>
>
>> I thought Fox was the one that claimed to be Fair and Balanced.
>

> That's true.
>
> Faux claims it is absolute truthful "news"---despite arguing in court
> that it is NOT a news channel---but entertainment.

If you can support that statement, please do so.

[Sid9]

"Bob" <daln...@att.net> wrote in message
news:8be10$51084046$7f000001$30...@news.flashnewsgroups.com...

You mean?
You mean to imply that FOX does not tell the truth?

[Tom]

On Jan 29, 3:33 pm, Bob <dalnet...@att.net> wrote:
> On 1/29/2013 12:26 PM, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:08:09 -0800, csamp...@inetworld.net (Charles H.
> > Sampson) wrote:

>
> >> Hell Stomper <stardusth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> At least MSNBC and Fox News don't pretend that they are unbiased.
>
> >>      I thought Fox was the one that claimed to be Fair and Balanced.
>
> > That's true.
>
> > Faux claims it is absolute truthful "news"---despite arguing in court
> > that it is NOT a news channel---but entertainment.
>
> If you can support that statement, please do so.

Sarah Palin and Bill O'Reilly come to mind as entertainers. They
certainly aren't journalists.

Tom

[RichA]

No kidding. None of them ever ask anything difficult of the White
House (make of that what you will) and none of them ever seem to do
any investigative journalism any more.

[RichA]

On Jan 29, 1:26 pm, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:08:09 -0800, csamp...@inetworld.net (Charles H.
>
> Sampson) wrote:

> >Hell Stomper <stardusth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> At least MSNBC and Fox News don't pretend that they are unbiased.
> >     I thought Fox was the one that claimed to be Fair and Balanced.
>

> That's true.
>
> Faux claims it is absolute truthful "news"---despite arguing in court
> that it is NOT a news channel---but entertainment.
>

> MSNBC does have to abide by Network journalistic standards

I hope no one was drinking anything when they read that line.

[Spokane Social Club]

On 1/29/2013 3:40 PM, Tom wrote:

>>> Faux claims it is absolute truthful "news"---despite arguing in court
>>> that it is NOT a news channel---but entertainment.
>>
>> If you can support that statement, please do so.
>
>
>
> Sarah Palin and Bill O'Reilly come to mind as entertainers. They
> certainly aren't journalists.
>
> Tom
>

I don't think you have a clue as to what O'Reilly's working and
educational background is:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_O'Reilly_(political_commentator)

O'Reilly returned to school in 1973[28] and earned a Master of Arts in
broadcast journalism from Boston University.[25] While attending Boston
University, he was a reporter and columnist for various local newspapers
and alternative news weeklies, including The Boston Phoenix, and did an
internship in the newsroom of WBZ-TV.[29] During his time at BU,
O'Reilly also was classmates with future radio talk show host Howard
Stern whom O'Reilly noticed because Stern was the only student on campus
taller than he was.[21] In 1995, having established himself as a
national media personality, O'Reilly was accepted to Harvard
University's John F. Kennedy School of Government; he received a Master
of Public Administration in 1996.[25] At Harvard, he was a student of
Marvin Kalb.[30]
Broadcasting career

O'Reilly's early television news career included reporting and anchoring
positions at WNEP-TV in Scranton, Pennsylvania, where he also reported
the weather. At WFAA-TV in Dallas, O'Reilly was awarded the Dallas Press
Club Award for excellence in investigative reporting. He then moved to
KMGH-TV in Denver where he won a local Emmy Award for his coverage of a
skyjacking.[31] O'Reilly also worked for KATU in Portland, Oregon, WFSB
in Hartford, Connecticut, and WNEV-TV (now WHDH-TV) in Boston.
In 1980, O'Reilly anchored the local news-feature program 7:30 Magazine
at WCBS-TV in New York. Soon after, as a WCBS News anchor and
correspondent, he won his second local Emmy for an investigation of
corrupt city marshals. In 1982, he was promoted to the network as a CBS
News correspondent and covered the wars in El Salvador and the Falkland
Islands from his base in Buenos Aires, Argentina. He later left CBS over
a dispute concerning the uncredited use in a report by Bob Schieffer of
riot footage shot by O'Reilly's crew in Buenos Aires during the
Falklands conflict.[32]
O'Reilly joined ABC News as a correspondent in 1986. He delivered a
eulogy for his friend Joe Spencer, an ABC News correspondent who died in
a helicopter crash on January 22, 1986, en route to covering the Hormel
meatpacker strike that day. ABC News president Roone Arledge, who
attended Spencer's funeral, decided to hire O'Reilly after hearing his
eulogy.[33] At ABC, O'Reilly hosted daytime news briefs that previewed
stories to be reported on the day's World News Tonight and worked as a
general assignment reporter for ABC News programs, including Good
Morning America, Nightline, and World News Tonight.[34]
O'Reilly has stated that his interest and style in media came from
several CBS and ABC personalities including Mike Wallace, Howard Cosell,
Dick Snyder and Peter Jennings.

[Capt. Justice]

US Action in Mali is Another Undeclared War

by Rep. Ron Paul, January 29, 2013
.
President Obama last week began his second term by promising that "a
decade of war is now ending." As he spoke, the US military was rapidly
working its way into another war, this time in the impoverished African
country of Mali. As far as we know, the US is only providing transport
and intelligence assistance to France, which initiated the intervention
then immediately called Washington for back-up and funding. However,
even if US involvement is limited, and, as Defense Secretary Leon
Panetta said, US boots on the ground are not being considered "at this
time," this clearly is developing into another war. .

As usual, the mission is creeping.
Within the first week of French military action in Mali, the promise
that it would be a quick operation to put down an Islamic rebel advance
toward the capitol was broken. France announced that it would be forced
to send in thousands of troops and would need to remain far longer than
the few weeks it initially claimed would be necessary.

Media questions as to whether the US has Special Operations forces,
drones, or CIA paramilitary units active in Mali are unanswered by the
Administration.

Congress has asked few questions and demanded few answers from the
president. As usual, it was not even consulted. But where does the
president get the authority to become a co-combatant in French
operations in Mali, even if US troops are not yet overtly involved in
the attack?

How did we get to Mali? Blowback and unintended consequences played key
roles. When the president decided to use the US military to attack Libya
in 2011, Congress was not consulted. The president claimed that UN and
NATO authority for the use of US military force were sufficient and even
superior to any kind of Congressional declaration.

Congress once again relinquished its authority, but also its oversight
power, by remaining silent. That meant the difficult questions such as
why is the action necessary, what would it entail, and what kind of
unintended consequences might we see if the operation does not go
exactly as planned, were neither asked nor answered.

When Gaddafi was overthrown in Libya, many fighters from Mali who had
lived in Libya and been trained by Gaddafi's military returned to their
home country with sophisticated weapons and a new determination to
continue their fight for independence for northern Mali. Thus the
France-initiated action against Libya in 2011 led to new violence and
instability in Mali that France decided it must also address. Shortly
after the French attack on Mali, rebels in Algeria attacked a BP gas
facility in retaliation for their government's decision to allow foreign
military to fly over Algerian territory en route to Mali. Thus the
action in Mali to solve the crisis created by the prior action in Libya
is turning into a new crisis in Algeria. This is the danger of
interventionism and, as we saw in Vietnam more than four decades ago, it
threatens to drag the US further into the conflict. And Congress is
AWOL.

There is a reason why the framers of our Constitution placed the
authority to declare war strictly with the Legislative Branch of
government. They knew well that kings were all too willing to go to war
without the consent of those who would do the killing and dying - and
funding. By placing that authority in Congress, the people's branch of
government, they intended to blunt the executive branch's enthusiasm
toward overseas adventurism. The consequences of this steady erosion of
our system toward the unitary executive are dire.
http://original.antiwar.com/paul/2013/01/28/us-action-in-mali-is-another-undeclared-war/
____ .
Read more by Rep. Ron Paul

On Obama's New National Security Team, Keep Your Eye on the Policy -
January 15th, 2013

NDAA Fuels Militarization, Enriches
Defense Corporations, Expands Empire - December 20th, 2012

Expanding Covert Warfare Makes Us Less Safe - December 10th, 2012

How to End the Gaza Violence - November 26th, 2012

Intervention Backfires in Libya - September 17th, 2012