Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

L.STAHL'S ON-THE-FACE NONSENSICAL REPORT/LTTR-BRN MALS

0 views
Skip to first unread message

withliquer

unread,
Mar 13, 2006, 6:18:13 PM3/13/06
to
SHE USED AS AN EXAMPLE OF LATER-BORN MALES BEING LIKELIER TO BE BORN
GAY IDENTICAL TWINS, WITH ONE BORN GAY. HOW PREPOSTEROUS CAN YOU GET?
OBVIOUSLY THE ISSUE OF DIFFERENT HORMONAL EXPOSURE IN THE WOMB IS
NEUTRALIZED BY THOSE TWO DEVELOPING SIMULTANEOUSLY.


ANYWAY, THE STUDY SHE SITES ENTAILS A TINY VARIATION OF GAY INCIDENCE,
NOT AT ALL TRUMPING THE FOLLOWING:

wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44185
It only matters that the gay genes only
pass maternally, as one alone accounts for 95%:

(Natl. Instit. of Health: Science, 7/16/93 and N.Y. Times, 7/16/93, on
page 1) NO WONDER psychiatrists considered man-hating mother the prime
cause of male homosexuality until discovered/apx. 75% of gay men carry
Xq28. Women can get 1 copy of 2, alternately; men, only 1 copy. Hamer's

discovery first covered in "Science," 7/16/93, and "N.Y.
Times",7/16/93, on page 1, by Natalie Angier, incl.:"THE LATEST RESULTS

INDICATE THAT THE NEWLY REPORTED GENETIC FACTOR IS PASSED THROUGH THE
MATERNAL LINE, A CURIOUS TWIST GIVEN THAT IN THE PAST PSYCHIATRY HAS
HELD WOMEN AT LEAST PARTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR FOSTERING THEIR SONS'
HOMOSEXUALITY." THE GENE RESPONSIBLE FOR 95% OF GAYS ONLY PASSES
MATERNALLY, AND THE OTHER, RESPONSIBLE FOR ABOUT 5%, ALSO ONLY PASSES
MATERNALLY.


"Wall Street Journal," 6/24/05, B1, by Sharon Begley:
http://online.wsj.com/public/article/0,,SB11195691103... (Natl. Instit.

of Health: Science, 7/16/93 and N.Y. Times, 7/16/93, on page 1 95%:


We have finally solved (gay pop. sustaqinability) this paradox, says
Andrea Camperio-Ciani of the University of Padua. The same factor that
influences sexual orientation in males promotes higher fecundity in
females.


http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns999965... The genetic
doubt caused by the double X's crossing out generality (the gay gene is

on the "X," or female, chromosome) is largely erased by the finding
some X genes do NOT cancel out (for example, the BRCA's.)


Rostler/Mundell "Homosexual Sex Exploding With US Women-15 Fold
Increase in 10 Years," Journal of Sex Research," 2001 37: 333-343
VERIFIES MENDELIAN 3:1 LESBIAN TO GAY MALE RATIO.

The Ital study says lesbians who do have children are genetically
inclined to have MANY children.

Did they simply observe the husbands of lesbians married
heterosexually being similarly induced to over-produce children out
of the fear of being wrongly ferreted out as gay?

INCREASING POPULATION AND MAKING GUYS INADEQUATE
ENABLED ANCIENT DESPOTS TO RUMBLE.

In "A Painful Discovery," Carren Strock ("Newsweek" columnist) said
there are very many very late self-aware, or simply self-denying,
lesbians

"20-20," 2000, ABC-News, "marriage counselors have seen a sudden influx
of middle aged married women with children complaining of "lacking
something," "not knowing what it is," and ultimately accepting that
they don't want to go further without accepting that they in fact are
lesbians.

historyoffear.tripod.com#science (will update this to reflect the
above response)

Stahl's report was so nonsensical as to have a rush I need to report
this feel. It's been suggested that in the Jewish case making straight
guys
afraid of being wrongly ferreted out as gay yields "J.A.P.s" (think
nannygate)
and petty ego dorks (think AIPAC members thinking they're gaining
Cheney's
favor when more likely Cheney wants them to get scapegoated for the
economic
fallout of whatever military policy in the Middle East he pursues.

On Stahl, "60 Minutes:" I recall this reported, hailing from DETROIT,
also
broadcasting a totally one-sided story on the new mass-transit systems
in Los Angeles, painting a distorted view of seemingly anything not
involving
one person for 4 wheels and an engine plus hundreds of billions spent
on imported
oil and a million injuried a year, all with nothing to show for it (the
mass transit
systems get people from point A to point B for generations after their
initial
investment.) The Detroit kid would've then also let you ignore the
structurally
casket-bound dollar when the bill for importing oil at high quantities
and prices
keeps coming due, all simultaneously with dampening economic activity.

0 new messages