On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:58:01 -0400, Sid9 wrote:
> Moderate Mitt is back.
>
> I wonder how the Tea Party and the "Pro-Life" gang feel about moderate
> Mitt?
Just my guess....
I don't think the Tea Party cares about pro-life issues. They're about
a more free-market economy.
On that, Romney is way better than Obama. Yes, Romney says he doesn't
want the portion of total taxes paid by the rich (big big part) to go
down. Of course, he'd also be for selectively reducing regulation that
is overly constrictive. Not at all getting rid of all regulation...
Obama's been pretty good at not regulating the GSA with their million
dollar parties, and NOAA with their party yacht. With the BP Gulf
spill.
However, Romney does want basic tax rates to go down, but deductions
to be reduced. (of course, whatever any President wants either way is
done ultimately by Congress, or not... and probably with changes...
some by Dems, some by Repubs..)
Pro-life people, if pro-life is their main issue, wouldn't consider
Romney their best candidate, although better than Obama. However,
probably a lot of them like for themselves, their kids and other
people a chance to have a positive economic future too...
Right now, the Black middle class is disappearing. The Black
underclass is doing worse and worse - all under Obama. Maybe it's
great that Obama is Black, but it's nice to have an economic future
too. That's better done in a thriving free market economy. Obama's
not into that. Democrats generally aren't, except in some
fantasy/socialist way.
As I see it anyway..
--
Bobby