Changes in the Sun’s Surface to Bring Next Climate Change
Captain Compassion
January 2, 2008
http://www.spaceandscience.net/id16.html
Today, the Space and Science Research Center, (SSRC) in Orlando,
Florida announces that it has confirmed the recent web announcement of
NASA solar physicists that there are substantial changes occurring in
the sun’s surface. The SSRC has further researched these changes and
has concluded they will bring about the next climate change to one of
a long lasting cold era.
Today, Director of the SSRC, John Casey has reaffirmed earlier
research he led that independently discovered the sun’s changes are
the result of a family of cycles that bring about climate shifts from
cold climate to warm and back again.
“We today confirm the recent announcement by NASA that there are
historic and important changes taking place on the sun’s surface. This
will have only one outcome - a new climate change is coming that will
bring an extended period of deep cold to the planet. This is not
however a unique event for the planet although it is critically
important news to this and the next generations. It is but the normal
sequence of alternating climate changes that has been going on for
thousands of years. Further according to our research, this series of
solar cycles are so predictable that they can be used to roughly
forecast the next series of climate changes many decades in advance. I
have verified the accuracy of these cycles’ behavior over the last
1,100 years relative to temperatures on Earth, to well over 90%.”
As to what these changes are Casey says, “The sun’s surface flows have
slowed dramatically as NASA has indicated. This process of surface
movement, what NASA calls the “conveyor belt” essentially sweeps up
old sunspots and deposits new ones. NASA’s studies have found that
when the surface movement slows down, sunspot counts drop
significantly. All records of sunspot counts and other proxies of
solar activity going back 6,000 years clearly validates our own
findings that when we have sunspot counts lower then 50 it means only
one thing - an intense cold climate, globally. NASA says the solar
cycle 25, the one after the next that starts this spring will be at 50
or lower. The general opinion of the SSRC scientists is that it could
begin even sooner within 3 years with the next solar cycle 24. What we
are saying today is that my own research and that of the other
scientists at the SSRC verifies that NASA is right about one thing – a
solar cycle of 50 or lower is headed our way. With this next solar
minimum predicted by NASA, what I call a “solar hibernation,” the SSRC
forecasts a much colder Earth just as it has transpired before for
thousands of years. If NASA is the more accurate on the schedule, then
we may see even warmer temperatures before the bottom falls out. If
the SSRC and other scientists around the world are correct then we
have only a few years to prepare before 20-30 years of lasting and
possibly dangerous cold arrive.”
When asked about what this will mean to the average person on the
street, Casey was firm. “The last time this particular cycle
regenerated was over 200 years ago. I call it the “Bi-Centennial
Cycle” solar cycle. It took place between 1793 and 1830, the so-called
Dalton Minimum, a period of extreme cold that resulted in what
historian John D. Post called the ‘last great subsistence crisis.’
With that cold came massive crops losses, food riots, famine and
disease. I believe this next climate change will be much stronger and
has the potential to once more cause widespread crop losses globally
with the resultant ill effects. The key difference for this next
Bi-Centennial Cycle’s impact versus the last is that we will have over
8 billion mouths to feed in the next coldest years where as we had
only 1 billion the last time. Among other effects like social and
economic disruption, we are facing the real prospect of the ‘perfect
storm of global food shortages’ in the next climate change. In answer
to the question, everyone on the street will be affected.”
Given the importance of the next climate change Casey was asked
whether the government has been notified. “Yes, as soon as my research
revealed these solar cycles and the prediction of the coming cold era
with the next climate change, I notified all the key offices in the
Bush administration including both parties in the Senate and House
science committees as well as most of the nation’s media outlets.
Unfortunately, because of the intensity of coverage of the UN IPCC and
man made global warming during 2007, the full story about climate
change is very slow in getting told. These changes in the sun have
begun. They are unstoppable. With the word finally starting to get out
about the next climate change, hopefully we will have time to prepare.
Right now, the newly organized SSRC is the leading independent
research center in the US and possibly worldwide, that is focused on
the next climate change. Some of the world’s brightest scientists,
also experts in solar physics and the next climate change have joined
with me. In the meantime we will do our best to spread the word along
with NASA and others who can see what is about to take place for the
Earth’s climate. Soon, I believe this will be recognized as the most
important climate story of this century.”
--
If you disagree with the theories and dogmas of Marxism or Scientific Socialism
then you are a tool of Capitalist interests. If you disagree with the theories
or dogmas of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming then you are a tool of
Capitalistic interests. Notice a pattern here? -- Captain Compassion
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to
escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. -- Marcus Aurelius
"...the whole world, including the United States, including all that
we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new Dark
Age, made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights
of perverted science." -- Sir Winston Churchill
Joseph R. Darancette
dar...@NOSPAMcharter.net
David Hartung
very interesting indeed.
cmdr buzz corey
wrote:
> Changes in the Sun's Surface to Bring Next Climate Change
>
> Today, the Space and Science Research Center, (SSRC) in Orlando,
> Florida announces that it has confirmed the recent web announcement of
> NASA solar physicists that there are substantial changes occurring in
> the sun's surface. The SSRC has further researched these changes and
> has concluded they will bring about the next climate change to one of
> a long lasting cold era.
Can't be. All those solar physicists, that have PhD's in their field
of study, simply must be wrong. The likes of Al Bore, Babs Streisand ,
and others (whom none have even basic education on the subject) have
already declared that global warming is a done deal and there can be
no further debate about it.
Snowflake babies with syrup
question. Look up Casey before reading any more of this nonsense.
Also go to websites that have legitimate science posting articles
about the solar energy, etc.
chatnoir
wrote:
headline:
Resistance is transversal
LOL: "Changes in the Sun's Surface to Bring Next Climate Change"
B26619 / Wed, 9 Jan 2008 03:04:22 / Intelligence
I wanted to document this brilliant bit of groundbreaking "research"
from a very reputable scientist for posterity. Thanks to bacchus for
the heads up. Be sure you let Paul Joseph Watson know, brother.
I'm still scratching my head at how he has records of sunspot activity
from 6000 years ago to analyze . . . I didn't realize they had
telescopes back then. It is also pretty impressive how anyone with
such an educational background as Mr Casey can write such poor
English. Perhaps Exxon or the CEI will come through with the financing
to hire a proofreader for his future press releases. ... (cont)
------
http://www.junkscience.com/blog/2008/01/08/must-have-brass-ones/
Must have brass ones...
January 8th, 2008 by Ed
Over the holidays there was a press release from the 'Space and
Science Research Center' making some extravagant claims and which
resulted in calls for information, the results of which were posted
here. At the time it was unclear how Casey expected to profit from his
actions -- now we know. The following turned up in my mail box:
Dear Editor,
Please accept my thanks at the outset for the outstanding job Junk
Science has done in providing an independent look at what is good,
bad, and just plain unknown in a variety of fields of science. I will
continue to follow your work.
This email is sent as a means of introducing what I have begun here in
Orlando, Florida, namely the startup of the Space and Science Research
Center. (SSRC). It is a division of a consulting company formed a few
years ago. I have attached a brief bio on myself and
just a few references for your review.
In the past two weeks I have taken the initial steps at launching this
new enterprise, one which has at its core, the mission of also
providing authoritative and independent scientific research.
The primary item on the agenda at the SSRC is the communicating of the
research done by myself and many other highly regarded researchers
especially in the fields of solar physics and climatology relative to
our prediction of the next climate change.
Based upon my own research begun in early 2007, I went from a global
warming acceptor to one who is now on a quest to tell as the great
radio commentator Paul Harvey says, "The rest of the story." That
story that has gone untold if not intentionally obscured is the role
of the sun in the heating and cooling of the Earth.
My research resulted in the development of "The Theory of Relational
Cycles of Solar Activity," or the "RC Theory." This theory was
developed on my part without any in depth knowledge of solar cycles
and Earth related climatic effects. I began by simply identifying
patterns in the sunspot records and extending that research into
carbon 14 and oxygen 18 proxies of solar activity going back 1,200
years. I then compared that to other sources of long term global
temperature records going back 6,000 years.
I was astounded at the outcome and more so that I had heard nothing of
the significant role of the sun, and the 'relational cycles' i.e. of
the dominant 206 year and 90-100 year cycles that I discovered. I call
them the "Bi-Centennial Cycle" and the "Centennial cycle." Certainly
there has been no public word of the predictable next climate change
amidst the media intensive coverage of the UN IPCC work and the
general man made global warming debate. I use the term debate lightly.
After completing my research and formulating my theory it was clear
that the message of the next climate change was that we are headed for
a deep long lasting and potentially dangerous cold era. This caused me
to conduct an exhaustive corroborative study of similar research to
see whether others had also found such indicators in the suns'
behavior. As you are probably aware there is indeed much research that
has been done and results published along the same lines as my
research that validated all or part of the "RC Theory," though when I
began my research again, it was all something that I was not aware of.
For example the cycles I named are also known as the Gliessberg and
the deVries/Suess cycles. In the past year I have communicated with
many of the authors of such outstanding research and they have not
only agreed with my results but some have offered to support me at the
SSRC going forward.
As a result of the impact the next climate change will have, I have
committed myself to the establishment of the SSRC, providing a
balanced review of important science that affects our citizens and in
particular gettting the word out about the next climate change.
To that end I took only the very first steps in the typical start-up
process by getting a virtual office, pending permanent funding and a
new location, published the SSRC web site and issued the first press
release within the last week. While I could have waited another six
months until all the first phase funding etc were in place, I felt
that this message was simply too important to hold back on any longer
and thus decided to do something now. Too much time has already been
lost. My research was in fact done roughly nine months ago. Even then
I took quick action to begin the notification of key government
offices about the impending climate change, with which in most cases I
have had a long professional reltionship. When the potential effects
are this serious and in view of the number of people to be affected by
the next climate change, I knew going out on a limb with an immediate
start of the SSRC and announcement was the only way to go.
The emails I have received from the first press release though, have
been overwhelmingly positive. There clearly is a lot of pent up
frustration over the last two decades of press on greenhouse gasses as
the cause of the past decades of increased planetary heating.
On the other hand there have been a few web postings questioning the
authenticity of the SSRC and its purpose. Given the fog of man made
global warming we have had to endure, such skepticism is healthy. I
have looked at some of these comments and taken immediate corrective
action on the web site to make sure the SSRC's status, staff etc are
clear. I am also attaching a related letter to one of those web sites
that specifically addresses these specific questions. I answer such
issues objectively and with the mind set that such are for the most
part well intended and like me are focused on getting the 'whole'
truth told.
In the course of getting the SSRC started and especially getting
meaningful funding in place, it essentially boils down to a step by
step process. I have taken but the very first small step on a long
path that will be many years in the making, as I and others like me do
our best to serve our various fields of science and our citizens.
Your help and advice along that path will be most appreciated.
Best Regards,
John Casey
Director
We think he's a scam artist trying to get his hands in your pockets
but couldn't see how he expected to do so -- now he's told us. He's
looking for 'meaningful funding' and he thinks the skeptic community
might be eager enough to slay the catastrophic warming myth to fork
over some cash.
We'd like to think skeptics are not a good target for scammers hunting
the gullible but with Al raking in cash with his fear campaign it was
inevitable some crook would try to siphon some off with another
'angle'. If you must give your hard-earned away bear in mind that
JunkScience.com is always chronically short of funds.