Today, the Space and Science Research Center, (SSRC) in Orlando, Florida announces that it has confirmed the recent web announcement of NASA solar physicists that there are substantial changes occurring in the sun’s surface. The SSRC has further researched these changes and has concluded they will bring about the next climate change to one of a long lasting cold era.
Today, Director of the SSRC, John Casey has reaffirmed earlier research he led that independently discovered the sun’s changes are the result of a family of cycles that bring about climate shifts from cold climate to warm and back again.
“We today confirm the recent announcement by NASA that there are historic and important changes taking place on the sun’s surface. This will have only one outcome - a new climate change is coming that will bring an extended period of deep cold to the planet. This is not however a unique event for the planet although it is critically important news to this and the next generations. It is but the normal sequence of alternating climate changes that has been going on for thousands of years. Further according to our research, this series of solar cycles are so predictable that they can be used to roughly forecast the next series of climate changes many decades in advance. I have verified the accuracy of these cycles’ behavior over the last 1,100 years relative to temperatures on Earth, to well over 90%.”
As to what these changes are Casey says, “The sun’s surface flows have slowed dramatically as NASA has indicated. This process of surface movement, what NASA calls the “conveyor belt” essentially sweeps up old sunspots and deposits new ones. NASA’s studies have found that when the surface movement slows down, sunspot counts drop significantly. All records of sunspot counts and other proxies of solar activity going back 6,000 years clearly validates our own findings that when we have sunspot counts lower then 50 it means only one thing - an intense cold climate, globally. NASA says the solar cycle 25, the one after the next that starts this spring will be at 50 or lower. The general opinion of the SSRC scientists is that it could begin even sooner within 3 years with the next solar cycle 24. What we are saying today is that my own research and that of the other scientists at the SSRC verifies that NASA is right about one thing – a solar cycle of 50 or lower is headed our way. With this next solar minimum predicted by NASA, what I call a “solar hibernation,” the SSRC forecasts a much colder Earth just as it has transpired before for thousands of years. If NASA is the more accurate on the schedule, then we may see even warmer temperatures before the bottom falls out. If the SSRC and other scientists around the world are correct then we have only a few years to prepare before 20-30 years of lasting and possibly dangerous cold arrive.”
When asked about what this will mean to the average person on the street, Casey was firm. “The last time this particular cycle regenerated was over 200 years ago. I call it the “Bi-Centennial Cycle” solar cycle. It took place between 1793 and 1830, the so-called Dalton Minimum, a period of extreme cold that resulted in what historian John D. Post called the ‘last great subsistence crisis.’ With that cold came massive crops losses, food riots, famine and disease. I believe this next climate change will be much stronger and has the potential to once more cause widespread crop losses globally with the resultant ill effects. The key difference for this next Bi-Centennial Cycle’s impact versus the last is that we will have over 8 billion mouths to feed in the next coldest years where as we had only 1 billion the last time. Among other effects like social and economic disruption, we are facing the real prospect of the ‘perfect storm of global food shortages’ in the next climate change. In answer to the question, everyone on the street will be affected.”
Given the importance of the next climate change Casey was asked whether the government has been notified. “Yes, as soon as my research revealed these solar cycles and the prediction of the coming cold era with the next climate change, I notified all the key offices in the Bush administration including both parties in the Senate and House science committees as well as most of the nation’s media outlets. Unfortunately, because of the intensity of coverage of the UN IPCC and man made global warming during 2007, the full story about climate change is very slow in getting told. These changes in the sun have begun. They are unstoppable. With the word finally starting to get out about the next climate change, hopefully we will have time to prepare. Right now, the newly organized SSRC is the leading independent research center in the US and possibly worldwide, that is focused on the next climate change. Some of the world’s brightest scientists, also experts in solar physics and the next climate change have joined with me. In the meantime we will do our best to spread the word along with NASA and others who can see what is about to take place for the Earth’s climate. Soon, I believe this will be recognized as the most important climate story of this century.”
-- If you disagree with the theories and dogmas of Marxism or Scientific Socialism then you are a tool of Capitalist interests. If you disagree with the theories or dogmas of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming then you are a tool of Capitalistic interests. Notice a pattern here? -- Captain Compassion
The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. -- Marcus Aurelius
"...the whole world, including the United States, including all that we have known and cared for, will sink into the abyss of a new Dark Age, made more sinister, and perhaps more protracted, by the lights of perverted science." -- Sir Winston Churchill
> Today, the Space and Science Research Center, (SSRC) in Orlando, > Florida announces that it has confirmed the recent web announcement of > NASA solar physicists that there are substantial changes occurring in > the sun’s surface. The SSRC has further researched these changes and > has concluded they will bring about the next climate change to one of > a long lasting cold era.
> Today, Director of the SSRC, John Casey has reaffirmed earlier > research he led that independently discovered the sun’s changes are > the result of a family of cycles that bring about climate shifts from > cold climate to warm and back again.
> “We today confirm the recent announcement by NASA that there are > historic and important changes taking place on the sun’s surface. This > will have only one outcome - a new climate change is coming that will > bring an extended period of deep cold to the planet. This is not > however a unique event for the planet although it is critically > important news to this and the next generations. It is but the normal > sequence of alternating climate changes that has been going on for > thousands of years. Further according to our research, this series of > solar cycles are so predictable that they can be used to roughly > forecast the next series of climate changes many decades in advance. I > have verified the accuracy of these cycles’ behavior over the last > 1,100 years relative to temperatures on Earth, to well over 90%.”
> As to what these changes are Casey says, “The sun’s surface flows have > slowed dramatically as NASA has indicated. This process of surface > movement, what NASA calls the “conveyor belt” essentially sweeps up > old sunspots and deposits new ones. NASA’s studies have found that > when the surface movement slows down, sunspot counts drop > significantly. All records of sunspot counts and other proxies of > solar activity going back 6,000 years clearly validates our own > findings that when we have sunspot counts lower then 50 it means only > one thing - an intense cold climate, globally. NASA says the solar > cycle 25, the one after the next that starts this spring will be at 50 > or lower. The general opinion of the SSRC scientists is that it could > begin even sooner within 3 years with the next solar cycle 24. What we > are saying today is that my own research and that of the other > scientists at the SSRC verifies that NASA is right about one thing – a > solar cycle of 50 or lower is headed our way. With this next solar > minimum predicted by NASA, what I call a “solar hibernation,” the SSRC > forecasts a much colder Earth just as it has transpired before for > thousands of years. If NASA is the more accurate on the schedule, then > we may see even warmer temperatures before the bottom falls out. If > the SSRC and other scientists around the world are correct then we > have only a few years to prepare before 20-30 years of lasting and > possibly dangerous cold arrive.”
> When asked about what this will mean to the average person on the > street, Casey was firm. “The last time this particular cycle > regenerated was over 200 years ago. I call it the “Bi-Centennial > Cycle” solar cycle. It took place between 1793 and 1830, the so-called > Dalton Minimum, a period of extreme cold that resulted in what > historian John D. Post called the ‘last great subsistence crisis.’ > With that cold came massive crops losses, food riots, famine and > disease. I believe this next climate change will be much stronger and > has the potential to once more cause widespread crop losses globally > with the resultant ill effects. The key difference for this next > Bi-Centennial Cycle’s impact versus the last is that we will have over > 8 billion mouths to feed in the next coldest years where as we had > only 1 billion the last time. Among other effects like social and > economic disruption, we are facing the real prospect of the ‘perfect > storm of global food shortages’ in the next climate change. In answer > to the question, everyone on the street will be affected.”
> Given the importance of the next climate change Casey was asked > whether the government has been notified. “Yes, as soon as my research > revealed these solar cycles and the prediction of the coming cold era > with the next climate change, I notified all the key offices in the > Bush administration including both parties in the Senate and House > science committees as well as most of the nation’s media outlets. > Unfortunately, because of the intensity of coverage of the UN IPCC and > man made global warming during 2007, the full story about climate > change is very slow in getting told. These changes in the sun have > begun. They are unstoppable. With the word finally starting to get out > about the next climate change, hopefully we will have time to prepare. > Right now, the newly organized SSRC is the leading independent > research center in the US and possibly worldwide, that is focused on > the next climate change. Some of the world’s brightest scientists, > also experts in solar physics and the next climate change have joined > with me. In the meantime we will do our best to spread the word along > with NASA and others who can see what is about to take place for the > Earth’s climate. Soon, I believe this will be recognized as the most > important climate story of this century.”
> Today, the Space and Science Research Center, (SSRC) in Orlando, > Florida announces that it has confirmed the recent web announcement of > NASA solar physicists that there are substantial changes occurring in > the sun's surface. The SSRC has further researched these changes and > has concluded they will bring about the next climate change to one of > a long lasting cold era.
Can't be. All those solar physicists, that have PhD's in their field of study, simply must be wrong. The likes of Al Bore, Babs Streisand , and others (whom none have even basic education on the subject) have already declared that global warming is a done deal and there can be no further debate about it.
Oh, Casey, the person who's credentials have been called into question. Look up Casey before reading any more of this nonsense. Also go to websites that have legitimate science posting articles about the solar energy, etc.
On Jan 12, 11:31 pm, Snowflake babies with syrup <goofin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, Casey, the person who's credentials have been called into > question. Look up Casey before reading any more of this nonsense. > Also go to websites that have legitimate science posting articles > about the solar energy, etc.
Resistance is transversal LOL: "Changes in the Sun's Surface to Bring Next Climate Change" B26619 / Wed, 9 Jan 2008 03:04:22 / Intelligence I wanted to document this brilliant bit of groundbreaking "research" from a very reputable scientist for posterity. Thanks to bacchus for the heads up. Be sure you let Paul Joseph Watson know, brother. I'm still scratching my head at how he has records of sunspot activity from 6000 years ago to analyze . . . I didn't realize they had telescopes back then. It is also pretty impressive how anyone with such an educational background as Mr Casey can write such poor English. Perhaps Exxon or the CEI will come through with the financing to hire a proofreader for his future press releases. ... (cont)
Must have brass ones... January 8th, 2008 by Ed Over the holidays there was a press release from the 'Space and Science Research Center' making some extravagant claims and which resulted in calls for information, the results of which were posted here. At the time it was unclear how Casey expected to profit from his actions -- now we know. The following turned up in my mail box:
Dear Editor,
Please accept my thanks at the outset for the outstanding job Junk Science has done in providing an independent look at what is good, bad, and just plain unknown in a variety of fields of science. I will continue to follow your work.
This email is sent as a means of introducing what I have begun here in Orlando, Florida, namely the startup of the Space and Science Research Center. (SSRC). It is a division of a consulting company formed a few years ago. I have attached a brief bio on myself and just a few references for your review.
In the past two weeks I have taken the initial steps at launching this new enterprise, one which has at its core, the mission of also providing authoritative and independent scientific research.
The primary item on the agenda at the SSRC is the communicating of the research done by myself and many other highly regarded researchers especially in the fields of solar physics and climatology relative to our prediction of the next climate change.
Based upon my own research begun in early 2007, I went from a global warming acceptor to one who is now on a quest to tell as the great radio commentator Paul Harvey says, "The rest of the story." That story that has gone untold if not intentionally obscured is the role of the sun in the heating and cooling of the Earth.
My research resulted in the development of "The Theory of Relational Cycles of Solar Activity," or the "RC Theory." This theory was developed on my part without any in depth knowledge of solar cycles and Earth related climatic effects. I began by simply identifying patterns in the sunspot records and extending that research into carbon 14 and oxygen 18 proxies of solar activity going back 1,200 years. I then compared that to other sources of long term global temperature records going back 6,000 years.
I was astounded at the outcome and more so that I had heard nothing of the significant role of the sun, and the 'relational cycles' i.e. of the dominant 206 year and 90-100 year cycles that I discovered. I call them the "Bi-Centennial Cycle" and the "Centennial cycle." Certainly there has been no public word of the predictable next climate change amidst the media intensive coverage of the UN IPCC work and the general man made global warming debate. I use the term debate lightly.
After completing my research and formulating my theory it was clear that the message of the next climate change was that we are headed for a deep long lasting and potentially dangerous cold era. This caused me to conduct an exhaustive corroborative study of similar research to see whether others had also found such indicators in the suns' behavior. As you are probably aware there is indeed much research that has been done and results published along the same lines as my research that validated all or part of the "RC Theory," though when I began my research again, it was all something that I was not aware of. For example the cycles I named are also known as the Gliessberg and the deVries/Suess cycles. In the past year I have communicated with many of the authors of such outstanding research and they have not only agreed with my results but some have offered to support me at the SSRC going forward.
As a result of the impact the next climate change will have, I have committed myself to the establishment of the SSRC, providing a balanced review of important science that affects our citizens and in particular gettting the word out about the next climate change.
To that end I took only the very first steps in the typical start-up process by getting a virtual office, pending permanent funding and a new location, published the SSRC web site and issued the first press release within the last week. While I could have waited another six months until all the first phase funding etc were in place, I felt that this message was simply too important to hold back on any longer and thus decided to do something now. Too much time has already been lost. My research was in fact done roughly nine months ago. Even then I took quick action to begin the notification of key government offices about the impending climate change, with which in most cases I have had a long professional reltionship. When the potential effects are this serious and in view of the number of people to be affected by the next climate change, I knew going out on a limb with an immediate start of the SSRC and announcement was the only way to go.
The emails I have received from the first press release though, have been overwhelmingly positive. There clearly is a lot of pent up frustration over the last two decades of press on greenhouse gasses as the cause of the past decades of increased planetary heating.
On the other hand there have been a few web postings questioning the authenticity of the SSRC and its purpose. Given the fog of man made global warming we have had to endure, such skepticism is healthy. I have looked at some of these comments and taken immediate corrective action on the web site to make sure the SSRC's status, staff etc are clear. I am also attaching a related letter to one of those web sites that specifically addresses these specific questions. I answer such issues objectively and with the mind set that such are for the most part well intended and like me are focused on getting the 'whole' truth told.
In the course of getting the SSRC started and especially getting meaningful funding in place, it essentially boils down to a step by step process. I have taken but the very first small step on a long path that will be many years in the making, as I and others like me do our best to serve our various fields of science and our citizens.
Your help and advice along that path will be most appreciated.
Best Regards,
John Casey Director
We think he's a scam artist trying to get his hands in your pockets but couldn't see how he expected to do so -- now he's told us. He's looking for 'meaningful funding' and he thinks the skeptic community might be eager enough to slay the catastrophic warming myth to fork over some cash.
We'd like to think skeptics are not a good target for scammers hunting the gullible but with Al raking in cash with his fear campaign it was inevitable some crook would try to siphon some off with another 'angle'. If you must give your hard-earned away bear in mind that JunkScience.com is always chronically short of funds.
