Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Who owns the Bush administration?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
TheFifthDeadlySin  
View profile  
 More options Mar 4 2004, 12:19 pm
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.greens, alt.politics.usa, alt.politics.usa.republicans
From: "TheFifthDeadlySin" <gr...@whitehouse.gov>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 17:07:33 GMT
Local: Thurs, Mar 4 2004 12:07 pm
Subject: Who owns the Bush administration?
Ohio: Ground Zero For Bush Fundraising

By David Donnelly, AlterNet
March 3, 2004

-snip-

Bush's campaign has already held five major fundraisers in all of Ohio's
major cities, raising approximately $5.25 million. Surprisingly, Cincinnati
ZIP-code 45243 ranks second only to New York City's 10021 as the most
lucrative fundraising neighborhood for Bush, surpassing wealthy communities
in Houston, Dallas and even Beverly Hills. (For a full analysis of all $200
and up federal contributors by zip codes correlated with race and ethnicity,
see Public Campaign's Color of Money report.

But when you look at three Ohio mega-fundraisers for Bush - W.R. Timken, CEO
of Timken Company; Anthony Alexander, president of FirstEnergy Corporation;
and Walden O'Dell, CEO of Diebold Corporation - a delicious microcosm
emerges: In these three examples of special interest fundraising, we have
three of the recurring themes of Bush's administration.

1) Tax cuts for the wealthy (Timken) that have produced job stagnation and
cuts for the common folks; 2) Paybacks to corporate polluters (Alexander);
and 3) Support from well-positioned, powerful players (O'Dell), which has
created the appearance of rigging the game to aid his success.

Tax Breaks for the Wealthy, Layoffs for Workers

On April 24, 2003, President Bush traveled to Timken Company's Canton plant
to promote his tax plan. In a speech to workers, he promised that the tax
cut plan "means more money for investments, more money for growth and more
money for jobs." Numerous studies have refuted that claim, showing that
while the President's tax cuts rewarded wealthy Americans like Timken's CEO,
W.R. "Tim" Timken with tens of thousands of dollars in tax windfalls, the
rest of America actually received relatively little.

Two months later, Tim Timken co-hosted a fundraiser for Bush's campaign in
Akron which raised $600,000, and earned Timken "Ranger" status.

Then, in September, Timken Company announced it was laying off 700 workers,
adding more pain to one of the jobless recovery's most hardest-hit states.
In fact, since Bush was elected, Ohio has lost 270,000 jobs. So much for
"more money for jobs."

Paybacks for Polluters

Also co-hosting the Akron fundraiser was Anthony Alexander, president of
FirstEnergy Corporation. Alexander, who raised at least $100,000 in 2000,
has met that threshold again in the 2004 election, earning him repeat
"Pioneer" honors.

When Vice President Dick Cheney put together a secret task force to develop
a national energy plan in 2001, coal-fired utilities like FirstEnergy urged
the Administration to gut the Clean Air Act. FirstEnergy had a major
conflict of interest: In 1999, the US Department of Justice had sued it and
10 other corporations for violating the Clean Air Act.

As the Akron fundraiser was being held, FirstEnergy's case was finally
nearing a decision point in the courts.

On Aug. 7, a federal judge found that FirstEnergy had violated the Clean Air
Act 11 times. But later that month, the Bush Administration rolled back the
very provision in the Clean Air Act that FirstEnergy had repeatedly
violated. The timing couldn't have been better. Since FirstEnergy's trial
has not yet entered the penalty phase, this stroke of a pen could spare the
company literally hundreds of millions in fines.

Help From Powerful Friends?

The story of Walden O'Dell's fundraising for Bush and Republicans adds a
shadier dimension to the already simmering debate around voting machines.
O'Dell is the CEO of Diebold Corporation, the maker of ATMs, touch-screen
voting machines, and other products. O'Dell's company is one of a few to
have reaped a large number of state contracts to upgrade the nation's voting
apparatus.

Conspiracy theories about the touch-screen voting machines are prevalent on
the internet, and questions about their accuracy have made their way into
the mainstream media.

Fanning the flames is the fact that O'Dell has been actively fundraising for
Bush. In an invitation for a Bush fundraiser at his Columbus mansion last
year, O'Dell wrote that he was "committed to helping Ohio deliver its
electoral votes to the president next year." The words set off alarm bells
in the voting rights community and newsrooms alike because the letter was
sent after Diebold had secured a contract from Ohio's Republican Secretary
of State to provide the state's new voting machines.

O'Dell later issued a non-apology telling the Cleveland Plain-Dealer, "I'm
not doing anything wrong or complicated, but it obviously did leave me open
to the criticism I've received." The fundraising invitation had its desired
effect, however, and O'Dell raised at least $100,000. He was added to the
campaign's list of Pioneers on Sept. 30.

Protecting the Investment

"The Democrats have no choice but to try to make money Bush's liability," a
prominent Republican fundraiser told the Times last June. "They have to try
to tie the money to special interests, tie the special interests to
unpopular issues and then tie it all around Bush's neck...."

But as the presidential race has tightened, the rhetoric surrounding
fundraising seems to be getting balder all the time. According to the Jan. 9
Miami Herald, one Bush "Ranger," developer Mark Guzzetta, implored donors to
make a contribution to Bush during a fundraising event in order to
"[p]rotect your investment."

If the maxim that all politics is local is true, progressives concerned
about the Administration's agenda have a lot of material to work with in
tying the President's Ohio fundraising "around Bush's neck."

David Donnelly is the director of Public Campaign Action Fund's Campaign
Money Watch.

http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=18006

--------------------------------------------------
There are at least three forms of greed:

1) an obsessive desire for ever more material goods and the attendant power.
2) a fearful need to store up surplus goods for a vaguely defined time of
want.
3) a desire for more earthly goods for their own sake.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bob  
View profile  
 More options Mar 4 2004, 4:07 pm
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.greens, alt.politics.usa, alt.politics.usa.republicans
From: "Bob" <n...@email.address>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 15:07:22 -0600
Local: Thurs, Mar 4 2004 4:07 pm
Subject: Re: Who owns the Bush administration?
"TheFifthDeadlySin" <gr...@whitehouse.gov> wrote in message

news:bef779ce0020c7355aa64bcd0e7cdd9b@news.teranews.com...

> 1) Tax cuts for the wealthy

Something to think about!

Sometimes Politicians can exclaim; "It's just a tax cut for the rich!", and it
is just accepted to be fact. But what does that really mean?

Just in case you are not completely clear on this issue, we hope the following
will help. Tax Cuts - A Simple Lesson In Economics.

This is how the cookie crumbles. Please read it carefully.

Let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand. Suppose that every day, ten
men go out for dinner. The bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their
bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this: The first four
men (the poorest) would pay nothing. The fifth would pay $1. The sixth would pay
$3. The seventh $7. The eighth $12. The ninth $18. The tenth man (the richest)
would pay $59. So, that's what they decided to do.

The ten men ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with
the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. "Since you are all
such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily meal
by $20." So, now dinner for the ten only cost $80. The group still wanted to pay
their bill the way we pay our taxes. So, the first four men were unaffected.
They would still eat for free. But what about the other six, the paying
customers? How could they divvy up the $20 windfall so that everyone would get
his 'fair share'? The six men realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if
they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth
man would each end up being 'PAID' to eat their meal. So, the restaurant owner
suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same
amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay. And so: The
fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings). The sixth now
paid $2 instead of $3 (33% savings). The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28%
savings). The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings). The ninth now
paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings). The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59
(16% savings). Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four
continued to eat for free.

But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings. "I only
got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth
man "but he got $10!" "Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only
saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than me!" "That's
true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only $2?
The wealthy get all the breaks!" "Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in
unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!" The nine
men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for dinner, so the nine sat down and
ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered
something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even
half of the bill! And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors,
is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most
benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy,
and they just may not show up at the table anymore. There are lots of good
restaurants in Europe and the Caribbean. David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D.
Distinguished Professor of Economics.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Vern Cole  
View profile  
 More options Mar 4 2004, 8:51 pm
Newsgroups: alt.politics.bush, alt.politics.democrats.d, alt.politics.greens, alt.politics.usa, alt.politics.usa.republicans
From: vern...@earthlink.net (Vern Cole)
Date: 4 Mar 2004 17:51:40 -0800
Local: Thurs, Mar 4 2004 8:51 pm
Subject: Re: Who owns the Bush administration?
The American people.  The American people own the U.S Senate and
Congress as well as the White House.  The politicians don't own us,
regardless of what John Kerry, who has never had a real job in his
life, thinks.

Vern


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »