GEORGE BUSH: MAN OF THE DECADE, INSTRUMENT OF GOD, or DEVIL'S HELPER?
EagleEye
Namely, that indeed we are rapidly approaching the end of a great historical
age, and that, the new world order, a phrase his father used after Gulf War
I, will need to be ushered in by none other than the US, in order to
leverage into place, in that middle place, where civilization began, and
where the remaining oil resides - the lifeblood and vitality of western
civilization - a monumental pillar for the transformation of the entire
nation of Islam, and ultimately the world, through which precious Israel,
and Jeruslem, the city of God, will be made secure. Why? Because according
to Judeo-Christian prophetic tradition, that is where the new global
administration and central governance will be centered by none other than
God as Christ Himself along with His heavely angles or agents, who will be
seen ascending and descending, after the New Jerusalem softly alights from
on high as a transcendant supra-national and even cosmological symbol of
civility which is both innerant AND trancendant. It's about civilization,
transformation, and about the cornerstone of civil liberty embodied in the
Judeo-Christian interpretation of the consumate relationship between God and
mankind.
But alas, I doubt that little swaggering George is as inspired as that. So
it must be about oil, greed and American special interests in relation to
the geo-stratic imperatives outlined by the likes of Feith and Perle, or
simply, rational self interest, in a competition for power and resources
according to nothing more than a Darwinian might is right survival of the
fittest and strongest law of the jungle, and thus, it is NOT civil or
civilized at all.
In fact, the only possible way that is CAN represent civility, is if it IS a
Biblical Judeo Christian crusade, as a counteracting force of civility
against the barbaric and uncivilized outcropping of the Islamic law of
Mohammed, - to push or to roll back Islam to "secure the realm" for Israel,
and for Jerusalem, to become once again the central pillar of civilization
in accordance with the will of God of the highest, who's own MO is love,
truth, beauty and justice for all in His eternal House.
Even the Pope I think is moving to a state of awaited anticipation when he
suggested in his Christmas speach that middle eastern peace is a
particularly urgent matter which needs addressing.
What I am beginning to see, is that these things, these "issues" if you can
call them that, are literally earth shaking in their implications and import
to civilization.
Perhaps, just maybe, Bush was the only man for the job, and that election
fiasco? a sign from God.
I can see no other way to interpret this latest historical episode BUT in
terms of a type of sperdeterministic space time event horizon as prophesied
by the ancient astrologers.
I know that may sound totally wacked and insane, but the dark rift in the
heavens which was spoken of and written about by early Christian mystics, is
likely the very same one, through which the sun rises in galactic allignment
(harmonic resonance) on December 23rd, 2012.
This allignment of the crossing point, or of a galactic equinox, is a
cosmological fact. In fact, there are corresponding astrological and
cosmological interpretations of the book of revelations which can be drawn
based upon those observations. Basically, it is the end of the precession of
the equinoxes and a resetting of the historical clock, perhaps even the
smashing of it, making of time itself no longer a relevant conceptualisation
of historical causation.
I honestly believe that secret esoteric knowledge possessed by the Catholic
Church, and by Masonic and Jewish "high priests" is at the very heart and
root of the matter.
Otherwise, all we are looking at is a pathetic display of selfishness and of
rational self interest in all this, and somehow, I must trust that the
"elect" do, when push comes to shove, know what they are doing.
I think they are attempting to set up a monolithic central pillar in Iraq,
from which a security "tent" will be woven, to shephard the path to a secure
and peaceful middle east, in order to pave the way for the coming of the
kingdom of heaven on earth, which would amount to nothing less than a
universal civility coming down from on high, and of course bubbling up from
within the individual himself, you and me, as a free will/God-will agent of
postive change and good will to his neighbor, and to creation itself,
unleashing in the process, not the law of diminishing returns, but of
increasing returns, at every possible level. In a way, what I'm talking
about is a type of global omega point of transformative change through the
spiritualisation of matter, along with a harmonic resonance and congruent
allignement with well, with heaven above.
Think of it. What greater gift IS there, but freedom from bondage, tryranny
and oppression at every possible level imaginable, leading ultimately to the
freedom from death itself as the final insult. There is none, and this gift
was given us, not only through the law of Moses, but through the completion
of the law in Christ.
Yes, it's a crusade, and yes it's Christian and Jewish, but I happen to also
believe that it *may very well* represent the greatest act of courage
imaginable.
There are only two conclusions that can ultimately be drawn. George W. Bush
and Co. is either the very worst, or one of the very best Presidential
Administrations in American History for what he has done, and is doing.
And that is from a man who believes to his core, that Bush and elements of
his Administration, namely some secret government composed of the CIA, the
FBI and a secret faction or arm of the Military establishement
co-masterminded the catylizing terminal event horizon of 9/11, in order to
unleash this "plan" which was laid down from time immemorial.
If viewed from this perspective, part of the Bush Doctrine MO is actually an
attempt to try to re-script the prophesy of the book of revelations itself,
so that it comes off as a type of "controlled demolition".
But if a type of Liberty garden is to be uncovered, beginning in Iraq, and
then emanating out of Israel, I would think that for such a monumental
effort to stand the test of time - that a tree of life must be planted in
the midst of it, which will transcend the hypocrisy and fundamental
contradiction of the duality of good and evil, which is the fruit of the
other standard (treee of the knowledge of good and evil), which brings not
justice, but death and destruction for all who eat of it.
Thus, the Pope is correct. The pressure that now needs to be brought to
bear, with the highest urgency, is upon Israel, the eye in this historical
storm, so that the keystone of peace might fall into place forming an
enternal bridge through which humanity may ultimately pass to freedom. If
what we're looking at is an attempt to construct a great bridge, then by
God, it's pilings must be driven deep, and it's foundation made secure, and
it's philosophical underpinnings must be fashioned based upon the very
highest ideals imaginable, and these are already encoded in the Bible, from
which the indestructable tree of life emanates and is dominant, in love, and
mercy as the ultimate spearhead of civilized progress which is both possible
and imaginable.
Needless to say, if my interpretation holds any water, which I think it
does, it's one hell of a paradox! To thread it, will require by neccessity
that certain power mongers free themselves from the final attachment to an
outcome, and surrender it into God's own hands.
If the keepers of the flame and the builders, at this stage of the game, do
not willingly submit themselves to a transcendant higher power principal of
truth and justice, which I would propose to be a mechanism of a gobal
mastermind alliance driven by civility - then I think that the pillar will
fall, and there will be hell to pay. In fact, if they do not relent and
submit THEMSELVES, then they will be making the very same historical mistake
which has Jesus crucified, yet which, according to the will of God was not a
mistake, but the intent, paradoxically again. I say this time, let's prepare
him room, and make way, and lay in plans for the wedding ceremony, and send
out invitations for the Great Wedding Reception. Some things, like change of
this magnitude simply cannot be supressed or shielded against. This is the
only way to avoid the impending cataclysm of revelations - to get with the
program and go with the flow. Surely other planetary civilizations were able
to turn the corner at the last minute and move into preparation and
reception mode before the great day. Why can't we? If I myself in writing
this, am, in my own narccisstic grandios way trying to bend history, then so
be it, 'cause I'm trying to speak to power in a way which will also pave the
way for God's own sovereign will to be not wrestled with, but surrendered to
in the final analysis. Plus I have the blood of Christ on me to protect me,
I hope.
If the world navel has just been pierced, then it will need the balm of the
warm embrace of a global civility, lest it fester, and become infected with
the hubris of man's greed.
"It is easier for a camel to pass throught the eye of a needle, than it is
for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God."
To understand the New Testemement Economy of God, we need to release from
attachment born of self will, and embrace universal principals of truth and
justice no matter what the cost, and chase the hyporcrisy from the system,
and then together, in a spirit of relative harmony, work hand in hand
together and with God to lay down the foundation stone for the creation of a
new garden and promised land who's MO is not selfishness and greed, but
peace and good will to all mankind, including the Muslims however misguided
they may be that they possess according to Islamic law, the highest truth.
It must be principals before personalities, and civility before the profit
margins of Haliburton and Bechtel! Imagine that eh, corporate greed and
individual lust for wealth and power being permitted to stand in the way of
the culmination of human history, and the ultimate consumation of the Divine
and the human will in the sovereign civil central governance of God
Almighty, the creator and architect of the Unvierse itself! LOL. Now THAT's
what's insane!
You think I am nuts?
Consider this, then sceptic.
There are more stars in the universe (one song), than there are grains of
sand on every beach, and in every desert on the entire face of the earth,
and for any advanced civilization, their technological, and spiritual
development would be to us indistinguishable from magic. If God's own throne
may be likened to the heavenly spheres, and earth his footstool, and if God
is Spirit, then in terms of a unversal dynamic of civility, within the the
framework of the highest law of life and love, why could the head, or the
figurehead of such an order and highest will NOT express his love, his
grace, and his mystery, along with his sovereign will over and historical
purpose for human history NOT reveal or discplose itself in the unfathonable
mystery of the divine incarnation of Jesus Christ, that is, if the MO of the
kingdom of "heaven" is for the will and power of the highest, to be humble
in servest to the lowliest low?
If there is a dynamic, and a structure or "tree of life", which is among
other things love, then why would not that love, since love to be love is
action, not willingly come down from the heighest height and disclose its
(His) purpose in history (his story)?
And would not such a being's agents of good will not be able to chart the
heavens, or transcend time and space, gravity and light? Think about it. In
the quantum realm, given abough time, anything, anything at all, can and
ultimately WILL happen.
And so, why could the star over Bethlehem NOT merely have been an orbital
star moving in relative motion to the observer?
For the Christian, does this "theory" blow out the mystery of faith and
grace? Hardly. But what it does in fact do, which I think is important, is
it provides for a rational ascension for the sceptive to move into and to
explore the great mystery of human existence in relation to the whole of it.
The intent of the will, and the spirit and throne of God remain safely
intact, and most certainly these things when pondered deeply still surpass
all human knowledge, and yet that CAN be chased by the human imagination,
and there's nothing wrong with that.
Anyway, something to ponder.
Regards,
Rudolf
>;0)
"NotBush2004" <not...@whitehouse.gov> wrote in message
news:0e2f3723a7c589ad...@news.teranews.com...
> GEORGE BUSH: MAN OF THE DECADE
>
> Wed Dec 24, 9:24 PM ET
> By Richard Reeves
>
> DALLAS -- With all due respect to two great institutions, the U.S.
military
> and Time magazine, the latter got it wrong when it picked the former as
its
> "Person of the Year" for 2003. President George W. Bush was the person of
> the year, perhaps of the decade and more.
>
> That man in the White House, the commander in chief of the 1.4 million
> American soldiers, sailors, Marines and airmen, changed the world for
better
> or worse when he sent American troops into action in Iraq. Time calls our
> military "the bright sharp instrument of a blunt policy." But the policy
is
> the story. The president decided to roll the dice, and we are the dice --
> the men and women in uniform more than the rest of us.
>
> The president is a bold, decisive and overconfident crusader, a
> self-righteous leader, a dangerous man. He changed the rules, ignoring the
> post-World War II history of alliances, multilateral institutions and
> containment. His rationale for the invasion of Iraq is called "pre-emptive
> war" in the White House and "preventive war" in other capitals. But, in
> fact, it is more than that.
>
> Saddam Hussein's Iraq was not a nice place, but we did not go there to
> pre-empt or prevent anything. We went there to change the regime and make
a
> new country in our own image. If Iraq were truly a threat -- to us or its
> neighbors -- it would have become the pre-emptive target of its neighbors,
> tough guys like Turkey, Israel or Iran. Remember: In 1981, Israeli jets
> destroyed an Iraqi nuclear reactor because it may or may not have been
> capable of being used in the development of nuclear weapons.
>
> The American "forward strategy," as the president sometimes calls it, was
> not about threat. It is a crusade strategy, not so much to stop terrorism
as
> to change the culture of the place, to promote freedom, democracy,
> free-market capitalism and the American Way, with absolute confidence that
> the American Way is superior to all others.
>
> For a long time, U.S. military strategy had been to position our great
> military power to deter upheaval and war in parts of the world we
considered
> essential to our own national security. Bush, with practically no
strategic
> background, was frustrated by that approach and considered the terror at
> home on Sept. 11, 2001, an indication that containment and alliances were
no
> longer adequate to combat new threats to our tranquility and prosperity.
The
> military, he concluded, was not there as a deterrent; it was there to use,
> bluntly. To paraphrase Marshall McLuhan on media, the military is the
> message. The military is the strategy.
>
> Will it work? I think not. It is based on a cherished American assumption
> that everyone in the world wants to be us. They don't. They sure would
like
> to have many of the things we have, but there are just as many American
> things they don't want, beginning with education for women. Watching
events
> evolve (or unravel) in Iraq, I sometimes try to draw analogies. What would
> we do, for instance, if a fundamentalist Muslim force, say the Taliban,
were
> able to conquer part of the United States and took American women out of
> schools and forced them into a kind of house arrest? And what would we do
if
> they told us how lucky we were to live that way, because their values or
> their God was better than ours? Would we fight? Would we resist? I hope
so.
>
> That is not going to happen -- and a big reason we are safe is the
sharpness
> of our military. But the Bush crusades have sent our troops into the
deserts
> and the holy places of people we don't know or understand. And they are
> going to hate us, as we will more and more come to hate them. Our bright
> military will be tied down. What will they be doing? Protecting themselves
> against locals; "force protection," in military terms.
>
> This is the crusade our leader wanted. George W. Bush is the man of this
> year of living dangerously. His assumptions and strategy should be the
> issues of the election in 2004. One reason Howard Dean has done so well so
> far as the election season began is that he recognized that single fact:
> Bush and his bold record are the issue. When and where does this crusade
> end?
>
> It is sobering and then some to think about what George W. Bush would do
in
> a second term.
>
>
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/uclicktext/20031225/cm_ucrr/g
eorgebushmanofthedecade
>
> --
> A pattern of deception
>
> A hard truth appears to have escaped the notice of the public and received
> scant attention from the media: Bush is the first president in American
> history to use deceptive propaganda as his main means of communications in
> selling his policies. His pattern of deception continues unabated and in
> direct conflict with the notion of the public's informed consent that is
> central to American democracy.
>
> Walter Williams is professor emeritus at the University of Washington's
> Evans School of Public Affairs.
>
> http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/news/opinion/6378746.htm
>
>
nshi...@columbus.rr.com
uncounted times.
Do you airheads EVER give up?
"Bush knows something you don't know"? Undoubtedly. He's smarter than you.
He graduated 9th grade, and he's not on welfare.
"EagleEye" <eagl...@omega.org> wrote in message
news:BgbHb.2495$cf2....@news20.bellglobal.com...
MHirtes
<nshi...@columbus.rr.com> wrote:
> Yet another silly leftist conspiracy theory! Or maybe the same one restated
> uncounted times.
>
> Do you airheads EVER give up?
Nope. And we're not gonna roll over and play dead for you repugs in 2004
either. We're going to fight until that despot Bush and his mafia are
deposed.
Get used to it.
EagleEye
for oil resources, and to project power in a push for global hegemony?
You see, most people have a hard time fathoming the notion that there are
many kinds of power, and that on a global scale theological underpinnings
and ideological frameworks have no bearing on how the scale is tipped and
the outcomes weighed.
Ironically, I blame post-modernism for this lack of awareness.
No reason has been given, other than some trumped up global terrorist thread
under the ficticious monicur of "al Quaeda", for the entire US foreign
policy position. None.
They already had the facts from Saddam's son in law who oversaw the
destruction of his WMD program after Gulf War I. Powell's presentation at
the UN was a completely falsified lie, and they knew it, or almost
completely knew it anyway.
If you don't think that the world as we know it is soon, within the next
10-20 years, about to undergo a profound transformation, at all levels, then
I think that you are the airhead who thinks that what you see is all there
is.
I may be wrong about a few things, but I don't know if I'm all that far off
the mark.
Do you not find it at least somewhat odd, that about 10,000 years ago, a
cosmologically aware and relatively advanced civilization sprang up
seemingly out of nowhere in ancient Sumeria and Babylon?
That I see the hand of an extra-terrestrial catalyzing force by the will of
God in ancient and in Biblical history, does not make me a loon, but instead
maybe an asute observer and detective of sorts.
What I am suggesting here is not some silly leftist conspiracy theory, but a
cosmological one or the farthest reaching proportions, which came to a head
in Christianity some 2000 years ago, but which, on close examination,
perhaps we are only now, in hindsight capable of unravelling, when we look
at it within the larger overarching historical context.
Since 9/11 Bush has been operating as though there is no tomorrow, and I
don't think that merely has to do with depleting oil reserves.
Take a closer look at all the masonic symbols imbedded in your culture and
in its foundation, and there are clues there as to the greater role that the
States believes itself to have been assigned by God in shaping human history
itself. US foreign policy for the last 100 years can be seen to be chasing
after something greater than mere self interest.
What I see is a Bush Administration operating on the basis of a countdown to
some grand unravelled mystery or "Magnum Opus" or "great work".
The symbol of a man pouring water from a jug, that is the symbol for
aquarious, and that age, according to the ancient astronomers, begins
precisely upon the winter solstace of 2012.
Me, I happen to believe that the 7 stars, the seven spirits, and the seven
lampstands of Revelations, do not refer to seven demominations of "the
church" at least not on earth, but instead refer to a much larger congruent
"heavenly" allignment. The "New World Order" is then, a new political
reality in terms of a new type of global central governance, which will be
ruled, not by the anti-Christ or one extremely willful and powerful "man"
but by the angels of heaven, according to the will of the king of kings and
Lord of Lords. I believe this not "merely" because I am a Christian
believer, but because I believe that there is a meaning and purpose to life,
which is love and civil liberty, and that God to be a God of love, must
surely intervene at some point lest the whole sphere of earth fall into
increasing corruption, resulting in a loss of the great work of the cross.
Evil accumulates, no matter what we do as fallen creatures, but fear not,
because every end is a beginning.
If the spaces between the stars are to be bridged along with the spaces
between the nations, along lines of civility, mercy, grace and love, leading
the world into a new universal civilized order, then hey - that would be a
great thing. No more starving and horrendous suffering, no more disease, and
ultimately no more death and decay, and increasing chaos and deprivation.
The salvation of the world would be at hand, and while we would need to give
up many if not all of our attachments to an outmoded way of life, the reward
in terms of overall happiness and peace would be immeasurable.
Here's the crux of my little theory.
Planets which can house life, and therefore intelligent life, are abundant
in the galaxy. Intelligent life, once it hits a certain singularity of
technological advance unravells the mystery of quantum gravity, and
therefore with the aid of quantum computing capable of mapping the
gravitational lines between the stars, is able to appropriate the means for
interstellar travel. If this is so, then logically, and rationally "they"
would have already arrived as a colonizing "colonial" force since over the
span of time, moving from one planet to another as a stepping stone of
"progress", such a species would have the means to colonize large tracks of
the milky way. Given the spans of time involved (our own sun is a third
generation sun) and with even close to speed of light travel (or beyond) we
would have already seen evidence of their existence in our quadrant and
solar system (which we probably already have). But there are not here, yet.
Why?
I purport that there is a binding force, or law of life and love, and
liberty, called civility which operates as a type of Star Trek-like Prime
Directive preventing contact until the spiritual evolution of a given planet
(or star - the conduit) reaches a certain level of
socio-political-economic-spiritual-technological reality. However God, the
highest power in the system, operating "through" these agents/aliens/angels
knows full well the problems and the struggles involved in raising such star
children, and so first he comes in the most appropriate way to reveal His
truth, and appropriately "brackets" their history in such a way and in such
a manner that the corrupting influence of entropy does not "ruin the crop"
so to speak. God is thus like a farmer, and his angels, all the way down to
us, right where we are in our lives, are his farmhands, and according to
Jesus anyway, the Owner of the vinyard though he may go away to take care of
other business, will return for the harvest, and to well, protect his
interests.
And so, in terms of a universal principal, transcendant of personalities and
individual human attachements, Jesus, as the embodiment of universal
civility, is representative of a "universal man" (the church or body of
Christ) who is himself, in all who believe and who hold to his convictions,
which are God's own truths of love, mutuality, and mercy over sacrifice - as
the actual spearhead of a universal civilized progress. He is the invitation
to the wedding feast, and He is the comsumation of that wedding, which is
the comingling of the universal will to love, and man's highest will, which
of himself, is nothing, since no man can engineering his own salvation apart
from a divine intervention by God as the highest will FOR him.
Christianity represents, as far as I can tell, the outpouring of a radical
forgiveness from the apex of the very structure and order of life all the
way down to the lowest braches of the tree, going to far as to dive down to
the very root, in order to raise up children of God, and future children of
light, in love. Christ thus came, as was prophesied to set the record
straight, that God's preference was not condemnation and vengeance, but
forgivenss, love and mercy, according to a tender embrace, which could not
be effectively extended without the price of suffering, or the cost of
infinite love, which likely gave birth to creation in the first place, for
the greater good of being and "becoming".
So what I am suggesting is that civilization on earth is itself in labour
pains, and that coming down the pike of a galactic allignment and harmonic
resonance is a communion with our own root which came from God in the first
place, and which at some point transcended a mere Darwinian evolution "by
design" however that actually came about in "the garden" east of the river
Tigris.
This intervention, or final bracketing of history in civility and love, I
would propose may actually be the ultimate "terror" that the Bush
administration is not fighting for, but is actively fighting against in a
vain attempt to shield the world against such a loving embrace and divine
civil intervention, the final attachment to an outcome being not that which
is in accordance with the will of God as the sovereign over history, but
with the will of man which is a will to power and dominion.
The only way to avoid the inevitable top down forced structured
crystallization and stratification of global society according to man's own
corrupt will to power, is to actually hope for a radical civil intervention,
or the return of the Farmer Himself, embodied in Christ, and administered by
His angels of light. Good must triumph over evil, and the truth over the
lie, lest life itself be a tragedy of cosmological proportions, or lest the
gift of freedom be usurped by the overwhelming will of God, which no one
could choose against.
And so I would suggest that the will to power and attachment of men of
wealth and power, if it is NOT working toward the grand realisation and
comsumation of the historial process, which is the reception of the kingdom
of heaven, is actively working in diametric opposition AGAINST that
underlying and overarching will, which is the will to freedom.
So Bush is trying to ride the edge, and to carve out a future and to bend
history to the will of the US AS GOD, OR He and His administration are
trying to carve out a path to peace FOR God by "securing the realm" for
Jerusalem to become the new global centralized civil governance of a new
type of kingdom and political reality, which is centred upon the cornerstone
of Christ's own governance, with angels seen ascending and descending over
the new Jerusalem, which will be both a place in the heart AND a real actual
place both on earth AND in heaven above.
What goes up, must perforce at some point come back down again.
If anything, this view is not left wing at all, but is right wing Christian
conservative fundamentalist.
What I am suggesting, is that to reach that place, that great crossroads,
particularly if it is coming soon to our own planet, that we must, all of us
from the top down AND from the bottom up, learn how to take wing and fly
along the middle way, and find our place there in the middle of the tension
and certain anxiety and fear of the unknown in the midst of the paradox, and
in the process pave the way for a global order which is squarely founded
upon civility as the highest ideal, and not on some barbaric might makes
right survival of the fittest law of the jungle. There simply has to be,
come either hell or high water, a solution who's central tenet drives
progress in a way and in a manner befitting what we know and have seen,
which is to say in a way which will become starting NOW, transcendant of the
moral hypocrisy and fundamental contradictions of historical good and evil
according to the ancient standard of the tree of the knowledge of good and
evil.
What I see is Bush, in a vain political attempt to hack away at the root of
evil, invariably hacking away at the tree of life and liberty itself in the
process.
It's a paradox and a moral quagmire, and it will likely remain that way
until, against all hope, we finally get relief in a helping hand from above,
and I propose that that very hand is right there, waiting for the word from
the father, as to when will be the most appropriate and loving moment to
intercede on our behalf.
If any of this scares you because you are not a Christian, don't worry about
it, since what I am really talking about, when it boils right down to the
ground of being and becoming, is the unconditional love of a savior, which
is an invitation, and which is nothing you can do to either earn or deserve,
but which, if you are a sinnner, you would be well served to try to uncover
or recieve and unwrap for yourself, and to do so not without a certain sense
of urgency. Why, you ask, if it is indeed inconditional? Because for
something to have value, it must contain within it righteousness, and
therefore judgement, and to be judged with the blood of the passover lamb
(which has been freely given) addorned to the door of your house, and your
families house, you will be judged according to your works, which will
invariably be found rather lacking, to say the least.
Christianity, and escape from judgement, is a gift which must be recieved
wholeheartedly, and willingly, and in love and in inexpressible gratitude,
if it is to have it's appropriate effect, which is to make of a spiritually
dead person, a new creation in Christ or you could say in life, love and
liberty, and justice.
The makers and administrators of the law are not just or righteous.
Therefore we must refer ourselve to a higher power, which is not an angel,
or an alien, but the head and master of the whole house who is spirit, truth
and life itself, embodied in the person and life giving spirit of Jesus
Christ, for there is none other, in human terms who can personify the will
of the creator and architect of the universe itself.
So when you consider these matters, think again about what is and is not
possible for God, because for God nothing is impossible, presumably not even
the passing of a camel through the eye of a needle.
And so, we have Christ breaking out of the tomb, and ultimately transcending
gravity itself, the final force, in making His ascension to only God knows
where.
If it is a lie, then the people who formed it, would have had to have had an
awefully powerful understanding of the holographic universe and of
transcendant principals of truth and justice.
Sure puts Biblical history in a whole new perspective though doesn't it?
<nshi...@columbus.rr.com> wrote in message
news:0kiHb.88811$031....@fe3.columbus.rr.com...