Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Developer plans 200-foot-tall cross in Missouri

6 views
Skip to first unread message

MattB

unread,
May 11, 2012, 3:45:49 PM5/11/12
to
Developer plans 200-foot-tall cross in Missouri

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/05/11/developer-plans-200-foot-tall-cross-in-missouri/

Public symbols of Christianity are under attack around the nation, but
not in Branson, Mo., where county officials have approved a 200-foot
cross that will rival American icons like the Statue of Liberty and
the Golden Gate Bridge, according to its developer.

Kerry Brown said the “God-given vision” of the Branson Cross came to
his father Dean two decades ago after he bought land atop Bear
Mountain near the intersections of U.S. highways 160 and 65 in
Branson, tourist mecca famous for its country music venues.
“It started as a vision with a 7-foot-tall cross just so people would
have a place to go and meditate with the Lord,” Brown told
FoxNews.com. “As time went on, additional portions of the vision came
to him and ultimately it was to build the largest cross that anyone
has ever seen.”

Brown hopes to have the $5 million project completed by the end of
2013. The cross will feature a 100-foot crossbeam and twin elevators
to the 17-story-tall horizontal bar. The project is being funded by
donations, and though Brown declined to say how much he's taken in, a
website associated with the effort said some $410,000 has been raised
so far. Much of the expense will go to preparing the mountaintop site.



Bert

unread,
May 11, 2012, 3:48:33 PM5/11/12
to
In news:i0rqq7l3juqv1tekg...@4ax.com MattB
<trdel...@Nomorespamgmail.com> wrote:

> Public symbols of Christianity are under attack around the nation,

Well, no. Just those put in place on government-owned or managed
properties, or by agencies of the government.

--
be...@iphouse.com St. Paul, MN

2966 Dead

unread,
May 11, 2012, 3:57:59 PM5/11/12
to
Maybe they could hang Macys Parade balloons from it at Easter...

2966 Dead

unread,
May 11, 2012, 4:00:10 PM5/11/12
to
On Fri, 11 May 2012 19:48:33 +0000, Bert wrote:

> In news:i0rqq7l3juqv1tekg...@4ax.com MattB
> <trdel...@Nomorespamgmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Public symbols of Christianity are under attack around the nation,
>
> Well, no. Just those put in place on government-owned or managed
> properties, or by agencies of the government.

Exactly so. I think the whole thing is silly, but as long as he's got
the permits and it's his land, he's got the right.

Matt

unread,
May 11, 2012, 4:09:16 PM5/11/12
to
On May 11, 2:00 pm, 2966 Dead <d...@gone.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2012 19:48:33 +0000, Bert wrote:
> > Innews:i0rqq7l3juqv1tekg...@4ax.comMattB
> > <trdell1...@Nomorespamgmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Public symbols of Christianity are under attack around the nation,
>
> > Well, no. Just those put in place on government-owned or managed
> > properties, or by agencies of the government.
>
> Exactly so.  I think the whole thing is silly, but as long as he's got
> the permits and it's his land, he's got the right.

Up to a point. Like anything, his rights end were others' begin. So if
he
is, for example, blocking the view of his neighbors, they could sue to
stop
on that ground.

Otherwise? I don't really care what he does with his own land.

Matt
Message has been deleted

Phlip

unread,
May 11, 2012, 6:11:15 PM5/11/12
to
On May 11, 2:51 pm, "Chine Bleu, Russie Blanche, et Khmer Rouge"
<chine.b...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In article <i0rqq7l3juqv1tekg2ompji9ll7brga...@4ax.com>,
>
>  MattB <trdell1...@Nomorespamgmail.com> wrote:
> > Public symbols of Christianity are under attack around the nation, but
>
> Publickly funded symbols on public lands. Privately funded symbols on private
> lands are only subject to the usual areligious building codes and zoning laws.

Uh, except we honor Catholicism each and every time we refer to the
largest city in Southern California as "Los Angeles"...

ozark...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 11, 2012, 6:35:32 PM5/11/12
to
On 11 May 2012 19:48:33 GMT, Bert <be...@iphouse.com> wrote:

>In news:i0rqq7l3juqv1tekg...@4ax.com MattB
><trdel...@Nomorespamgmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Public symbols of Christianity are under attack around the nation,
>
>Well, no. Just those put in place on government-owned or managed
>properties, or by agencies of the government.

Arlington?

2966 Dead

unread,
May 11, 2012, 6:47:49 PM5/11/12
to
They don't promote religion. The next of kin get to decide what, if any,
religious symbols adorn the tombstones.

Matt

unread,
May 11, 2012, 7:08:27 PM5/11/12
to
There is more than one religion that believes in angels.

Matt

Phlip

unread,
May 11, 2012, 7:23:25 PM5/11/12
to
& San Marcos & Santa Ana & San Clemente & San Diego & San Francisco
& ...

RichTravsky

unread,
May 12, 2012, 12:37:51 AM5/12/12
to
Bert wrote:
>
> In news:i0rqq7l3juqv1tekg...@4ax.com MattB
> <trdel...@Nomorespamgmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Public symbols of Christianity are under attack around the nation,
>
> Well, no. Just those put in place on government-owned or managed
> properties, or by agencies of the government.

Correct.

RT

RichTravsky

unread,
May 12, 2012, 12:40:00 AM5/12/12
to
Correct.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Veterans_Affairs_emblems_for_headstones_and_markers

Note this part:

... the Wiccan Pentacle was only added (in 2007) after a lawsuit by
Americans United for the Separation of Church and State...

Another snout smacking for a con-servative.

RT
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
0 new messages