Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Ann Coulter Spontaneously Combusts

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Moshe OReilly

unread,
Sep 3, 2003, 9:18:23 AM9/3/03
to
"...outside of Fox News Channels New York Headquarters, thousands of
publicity starved authors congregated, begging Fox to sue them.
"Since news of Fox's lawsuit against comedian Franken promptly sent his new
book to the top of the bestseller lists, a new lawsuit from Fox is now widely
regarded in the publishing industry as the most coveted seal of approval, even
surpassing inclusion in Oprah's Book Club."

See:Ann Coulter Spontaneously Combusts
Pundit keeps talking while fully ablaze
by Andy Borowitz, author of forthcoming book, "Who Moved My Soap? The
CEO's Guide to Surviving in Prison."
http://www.msnbc.com/news/957558.asp?Ocv=KB2O

George Johnson

unread,
Sep 3, 2003, 9:49:40 AM9/3/03
to
"Moshe OReilly" <mosheo...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030903091823...@mb-m27.aol.com...

I wouldn't be surprised.

Annie the Trannie is most likely 60% composed of molded polymer resins
at this point.
Lanky Skanky in a group of three actual females.

http://www.clubs.psu.edu/up/iwc/images/cpac005.jpg
(Harsh direct lighting like a camera flash can be a friend to give
worthwhile makeup hints. However, this photo is more telling than any on
just what is REALLY wrong with Ann. This is supposed to be three females
and Ann Coulter. Tell me, even with the harsh lighting, which one of these
people looks ODD. Didn't take long did it? All three women have natural
beauty. Each has an inner innate charm which shines through despite the
harsh light. Ann Coulter looks as fake as Michael Jackson - though not as
stomach churning at a glance. GAH! Compare the porportions of Ann's face
to the women in this image. Ann's chin is similar to the lady in red shirt,
but look at Ann's racoon eyes. Eck! No cheekbones, no female vibe, no
innate grace, yuck. Like looking at a drumskin stretched over a skull. Any
of these three ladies would beat Ann Coulter in a beauty contest in the
first elimination round. Should I even bring up Ann's OBVIOUSLY dyed hair
which is a complete uniform blonde with zero natural highlights or streaks?)

And going on to my GOOGLE IMAGE SEARCH previously done.

http://www.earlham.edu/~publicaf/photos/events-01/AnnCoulter.jpg
(The best pic yet. That scary neck Adam's Apple is very well defined here
though, the face actually seems to have cheeks, the "Joker Jaw" still looks
like a fake foam-rubber paste-on, and the hair defines "Limp Noodle" to a
"T". I could mistake this person for a woman in a 10-second glance. A
35-second-long glance starts the questions of "Something is wrong here...
what could it be?")

http://home.ec.rr.com/djacksonjr/acgreen.jpg
(Holy cow, look at that Adam's Apple. Look at that giraffe neck. Gah! On
the upside the Crazy-Eyes here look like standard human eyes.)


CB

unread,
Sep 3, 2003, 10:21:05 AM9/3/03
to

"George Johnson" <matr...@voyager.net> wrote in message
news:vlbsci2...@corp.supernews.com...

> "Moshe OReilly" <mosheo...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:20030903091823...@mb-m27.aol.com...

> http://www.clubs.psu.edu/up/iwc/images/cpac005.jpg


> (Harsh direct lighting like a camera flash can be a friend to give
> worthwhile makeup hints. However, this photo is more telling than any on
> just what is REALLY wrong with Ann. This is supposed to be three females
> and Ann Coulter. Tell me, even with the harsh lighting, which one of
these
> people looks ODD. Didn't take long did it?

Not for people who base life on sound bites, headlines, lipstick and
impressions made from image consultants like Naomi Wolf. Notice Ann is the
one in charge of the pen, shows leadership.


All three women have natural
> beauty. Each has an inner innate charm which shines through despite the
> harsh light. Ann Coulter looks as fake as Michael Jackson - though not as
> stomach churning at a glance. GAH! Compare the porportions of Ann's face
> to the women in this image. Ann's chin is similar to the lady in red
shirt,
> but look at Ann's racoon eyes. Eck! No cheekbones, no female vibe, no
> innate grace, yuck. Like looking at a drumskin stretched over a skull.
Any
> of these three ladies would beat Ann Coulter in a beauty contest in the
> first elimination round. Should I even bring up Ann's OBVIOUSLY dyed hair
> which is a complete uniform blonde with zero natural highlights or
streaks?)
>
> And going on to my GOOGLE IMAGE SEARCH previously done.
>
> http://www.earlham.edu/~publicaf/photos/events-01/AnnCoulter.jpg

What a wholesome picture. What a babe.

> (The best pic yet. That scary neck Adam's Apple is very well defined here
> though, the face actually seems to have cheeks, the "Joker Jaw" still
looks
> like a fake foam-rubber paste-on, and the hair defines "Limp Noodle" to a
> "T". I could mistake this person for a woman in a 10-second glance. A
> 35-second-long glance starts the questions of "Something is wrong here...
> what could it be?")
>
> http://home.ec.rr.com/djacksonjr/acgreen.jpg
> (Holy cow, look at that Adam's Apple. Look at that giraffe neck. Gah!
On
> the upside the Crazy-Eyes here look like standard human eyes.)
>
>

Those blue eyes tell no lies. She sees right into the camera to touch those
who's heart isn't filled with hate, illusions and simple impressionistic
imagery.

CB
--
"Mrs. Clinton, how did you get the name, 'Hillary?'" Her straight-faced
reply was along the lines, "Before I was born, a man named Sir Edmund
Hillary became famous for being the first person to climb Mount Everest. My
father named me after him as a symbolic message that I could achieve
anything I wanted in life....that I could climb ANY mountain......"

Sounds great, and typically Clintonesque. The problem is........well it is
a total LIE. Hillary was over 4 years old when Sir Edmund Hillary climbed
Mount Everest. No one had ever heard of him before then!!

--GOP

Impressionism is all the DNC 'is'. Ask "Slick Willy" and the creature Naomi
made from Eul Gibbons and Howdy Doody.


CB

unread,
Sep 3, 2003, 10:25:31 AM9/3/03
to

"George Johnson" <matr...@voyager.net> wrote in message
news:vlbsci2...@corp.supernews.com...
> "Moshe OReilly" <mosheo...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:20030903091823...@mb-m27.aol.com...

> http://www.clubs.psu.edu/up/iwc/images/cpac005.jpg


> (Harsh direct lighting like a camera flash can be a friend to give
> worthwhile makeup hints. However, this photo is more telling than any on
> just what is REALLY wrong with Ann. This is supposed to be three females
> and Ann Coulter. Tell me, even with the harsh lighting, which one of
these
> people looks ODD. Didn't take long did it?

Not for people who base life on sound bites, headlines, lipstick and


impressions made from image consultants like Naomi Wolf. Notice Ann is the
one in charge of the pen, shows leadership.

All three women have natural
> beauty. Each has an inner innate charm which shines through despite the
> harsh light. Ann Coulter looks as fake as Michael Jackson - though not as
> stomach churning at a glance. GAH! Compare the porportions of Ann's face
> to the women in this image. Ann's chin is similar to the lady in red
shirt,
> but look at Ann's racoon eyes. Eck! No cheekbones, no female vibe, no
> innate grace, yuck. Like looking at a drumskin stretched over a skull.
Any
> of these three ladies would beat Ann Coulter in a beauty contest in the
> first elimination round. Should I even bring up Ann's OBVIOUSLY dyed hair
> which is a complete uniform blonde with zero natural highlights or
streaks?)
>
> And going on to my GOOGLE IMAGE SEARCH previously done.
>
> http://www.earlham.edu/~publicaf/photos/events-01/AnnCoulter.jpg

What a wholesome picture. What a babe. She lights up the room with her
presence

> (The best pic yet. That scary neck Adam's Apple is very well defined here
> though, the face actually seems to have cheeks, the "Joker Jaw" still
looks
> like a fake foam-rubber paste-on, and the hair defines "Limp Noodle" to a
> "T". I could mistake this person for a woman in a 10-second glance. A
> 35-second-long glance starts the questions of "Something is wrong here...
> what could it be?")
>
> http://home.ec.rr.com/djacksonjr/acgreen.jpg
> (Holy cow, look at that Adam's Apple. Look at that giraffe neck. Gah!
On
> the upside the Crazy-Eyes here look like standard human eyes.)
>
>

Those blue eyes tell no lies. She sees right into the camera to touch those

George Johnson

unread,
Sep 3, 2003, 7:14:40 PM9/3/03
to
"CB" <C...@prayforme.com> wrote in message
news:bj4td8$4se$2...@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com...

|
| "George Johnson" <matr...@voyager.net> wrote in message
| news:vlbsci2...@corp.supernews.com...
| > "Moshe OReilly" <mosheo...@aol.com> wrote in message
| > news:20030903091823...@mb-m27.aol.com...
|
| > http://www.clubs.psu.edu/up/iwc/images/cpac005.jpg
| > (Harsh direct lighting like a camera flash can be a friend to give
| > worthwhile makeup hints. However, this photo is more telling than any
on
| > just what is REALLY wrong with Ann. This is supposed to be three
females
| > and Ann Coulter. Tell me, even with the harsh lighting, which one of
| these
| > people looks ODD. Didn't take long did it?
|
| Not for people who base life on sound bites, headlines, lipstick and
| impressions made from image consultants like Naomi Wolf. Notice Ann is the
| one in charge of the pen, shows leadership.

A plastic fake woman being defended by a plastic fake Christian.

How repulsive.


George Johnson

unread,
Sep 3, 2003, 7:21:44 PM9/3/03
to
"CB" <C...@prayforme.com> wrote in message
news:bj4t4q$4jp$1...@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com...

|
| "George Johnson" <matr...@voyager.net> wrote in message
| news:vlbsci2...@corp.supernews.com...
| > "Moshe OReilly" <mosheo...@aol.com> wrote in message
| > news:20030903091823...@mb-m27.aol.com...
|
| > http://www.clubs.psu.edu/up/iwc/images/cpac005.jpg
| > (Harsh direct lighting like a camera flash can be a friend to give
| > worthwhile makeup hints. However, this photo is more telling than any
on
| > just what is REALLY wrong with Ann. This is supposed to be three
females
| > and Ann Coulter. Tell me, even with the harsh lighting, which one of
| these
| > people looks ODD. Didn't take long did it?
|
| Not for people who base life on sound bites, headlines, lipstick and
| impressions made from image consultants like Naomi Wolf. Notice Ann is the
| one in charge of the pen, shows leadership.

Let us see. A PROVEN SERIAL LIAR defended by another PROVEN SERIAL
LIAR.
Nothing you slap out is worth the electrons to display it with.
Small wonder the KGB-GOP is a "leadershit" of liars.

| All three women have natural
| > beauty. Each has an inner innate charm which shines through despite the
| > harsh light. Ann Coulter looks as fake as Michael Jackson - though not
as
| > stomach churning at a glance. GAH! Compare the porportions of Ann's
face
| > to the women in this image. Ann's chin is similar to the lady in red
| shirt,
| > but look at Ann's racoon eyes. Eck! No cheekbones, no female vibe, no
| > innate grace, yuck. Like looking at a drumskin stretched over a skull.
| Any
| > of these three ladies would beat Ann Coulter in a beauty contest in the
| > first elimination round. Should I even bring up Ann's OBVIOUSLY dyed
hair
| > which is a complete uniform blonde with zero natural highlights or
| streaks?)
| >
| > And going on to my GOOGLE IMAGE SEARCH previously done.
| >
| > http://www.earlham.edu/~publicaf/photos/events-01/AnnCoulter.jpg
|
| What a wholesome picture. What a babe.

Which is exactly why my other term for "her" is Skele-WHORE.
You need to get your eyeballs checked.

| > (The best pic yet. That scary neck Adam's Apple is very well defined
here
| > though, the face actually seems to have cheeks, the "Joker Jaw" still
| looks
| > like a fake foam-rubber paste-on, and the hair defines "Limp Noodle" to
a
| > "T". I could mistake this person for a woman in a 10-second glance. A
| > 35-second-long glance starts the questions of "Something is wrong
here...
| > what could it be?")
| >
| > http://home.ec.rr.com/djacksonjr/acgreen.jpg
| > (Holy cow, look at that Adam's Apple. Look at that giraffe neck. Gah!
| On
| > the upside the Crazy-Eyes here look like standard human eyes.)
| >
| >
|
| Those blue eyes tell no lies. She sees right into the camera to touch
those
| who's heart isn't filled with hate, illusions and simple impressionistic
| imagery.
|
| CB
| --

Bwahaahaaaahaaa!

Tells no lies?!? Yeah, it is "her" full-of-shit lying mouth and
demented lying brain that tells all the lies.
Heart not filled with hate?!? What a load of pure crap EVEN FROM YOU!

This is from a galling Skele-WHORE that has an entire existence based on
stoking the fires of hate.

However, this is not surprising from a lifetime liar and servant of
Satan like yourself.


Rich Travsky

unread,
Sep 3, 2003, 10:50:56 PM9/3/03
to
CB wrote:
>
> "George Johnson" <matr...@voyager.net> wrote in message
> news:vlbsci2...@corp.supernews.com...
> > "Moshe OReilly" <mosheo...@aol.com> wrote in message
> > news:20030903091823...@mb-m27.aol.com...
>
> > http://www.clubs.psu.edu/up/iwc/images/cpac005.jpg
> > (Harsh direct lighting like a camera flash can be a friend to give
> > worthwhile makeup hints. However, this photo is more telling than any on
> > just what is REALLY wrong with Ann. This is supposed to be three females
> > and Ann Coulter. Tell me, even with the harsh lighting, which one of
> these
> > people looks ODD. Didn't take long did it?
>
> Not for people who base life on sound bites, headlines, lipstick and
> impressions made from image consultants like Naomi Wolf. Notice Ann is the
> one in charge of the pen, shows leadership.

It does? How?

> All three women have natural
> > beauty. Each has an inner innate charm which shines through despite the
> > harsh light. Ann Coulter looks as fake as Michael Jackson - though not as
> > stomach churning at a glance. GAH! Compare the porportions of Ann's face
> > to the women in this image. Ann's chin is similar to the lady in red
> shirt,
> > but look at Ann's racoon eyes. Eck! No cheekbones, no female vibe, no
> > innate grace, yuck. Like looking at a drumskin stretched over a skull.
> Any
> > of these three ladies would beat Ann Coulter in a beauty contest in the
> > first elimination round. Should I even bring up Ann's OBVIOUSLY dyed hair
> > which is a complete uniform blonde with zero natural highlights or
> streaks?)
> >
> > And going on to my GOOGLE IMAGE SEARCH previously done.
> >
> > http://www.earlham.edu/~publicaf/photos/events-01/AnnCoulter.jpg
>
> What a wholesome picture. What a babe. She lights up the room with her
> presence

And in her 40s and still single.

> > (The best pic yet. That scary neck Adam's Apple is very well defined here
> > though, the face actually seems to have cheeks, the "Joker Jaw" still
> looks
> > like a fake foam-rubber paste-on, and the hair defines "Limp Noodle" to a
> > "T". I could mistake this person for a woman in a 10-second glance. A
> > 35-second-long glance starts the questions of "Something is wrong here...
> > what could it be?")
> >
> > http://home.ec.rr.com/djacksonjr/acgreen.jpg
> > (Holy cow, look at that Adam's Apple. Look at that giraffe neck. Gah!
> On
> > the upside the Crazy-Eyes here look like standard human eyes.)
> >
> >
>
> Those blue eyes tell no lies. She sees right into the camera to touch those
> who's heart isn't filled with hate, illusions and simple impressionistic
> imagery.

Hate huh? Like this?

"I want you to let a wave of hatred wash over you. Yes, hate is good
. . our goal is a Christian nation. We have a biblical duty, we are
called on by God to conquer this country. We don't want equal time.
We don't want pluralism." -- Randall Terry, head of Operation Rescue
The News-Sentinel, Fort Wayne, Indiana. 8-16-93

0 new messages