THE FEDERALIST - Special Year-end Edition - About the "religious" content in The Federalist -- we do not subscribe to the errant "separation of church and state" dogma. We know what the Founders had to say about the integral role of faith in government...
CB
THE FEDERALIST(r) DIGEST
The Conservative e-Journal of Record
* Veritas Vos Liberabit *
28 December 2001
Federalist Edition #01-51/52
Special Year-end Edition
*To support The Federalist,
Link to -- http://www.Federalist.com/support.asp
*To retrieve today's Digest as HTML printer-friendly text or PDF
Link to -- http://www.Federalist.com/current2001.asp
*To change your e-mail address or format, see instructions in footer.
CONTENTS:
The Foundation
Federalist Perspective
Publisher's Year-end Note
______----********O********----______
THE FOUNDATION
"Contemplate the mangled bodies of your countrymen, and then say,
'What should be the reward of such sacrifices?' Bid us and our
posterity bow the knee, supplicate the friendship, and plough, and
sow, and reap, to glut the avarice of the men who have let loose on us
the dogs of war to riot in our blood and hunt us from the face of the
earth? If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of
servitude than the animating contest of freedom, go from us in peace.
We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which
feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity
forget that ye were our countrymen!" --Samuel Adams
______----********O********----______
FEDERALIST YEAR-END PERSPECTIVE
This first year of the millennium has been a climactic one, in which
recent political and cultural commentary repeatedly reminded our
nation that "everything has changed." But our readers can rest assured
that The Federalist will never waver from our dedication to the
principles of our nation's founding, and our commitment to providing
reporting and analysis of news, policy and opinion in the light of
those principles.
In review of this year past, here are a few snapshots from our 2001
editions.
1. Top of the fold...
The biggest story of the year arrived September 11th, when
international terrorism visited the World Trade Center again, claiming
the lives of thousands of our countrymen. Cells of terrorists linked
to Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network hijacked four commercial
jetliners, flying two into the twin towers of the World Trade Center
and a third into the Pentagon, while brave patriots on the fourth
fought their captors -- losing their lives in a Pennsylvania field
rather than at the terrorists' intended target in our nation's
capital. They became the fist combat casualties of our war against
Jihadistan.
The year began with the final days of Bill Clinton's presidency,
during which the Prevaricator-in-Chief's last scandal in office,
Pardongate (granting pardons for campaign cash), played out. Lingering
bitterness over the close and hard-fought presidential election
between George W. Bush and Albert Arnold Gore provided ample
opportunity for the Leftmedia to again demonstrate just how wrong they
could be -- in this case, predicting that President Bush would be
dogged by contentiousness and resentment during his term of office,
and that he lacked the stature of a Commander-in-Chief.
In fact, the year laid bare stark revelations of the media's proneness
to mistaking evanescent symbolic displays for real actions, in their
clear preference for Mr. Clinton, as well as their perennial failure
to recognize the harbingers of effective leadership -- including Mr.
Bush's quiet qualities of strength of character and prudence in
judgment. Not least in that prudential judgment has been Bush's
selection of such administration leaders as Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld, who, along with Attorney General John Ashcroft, have proven
nothing less than Reaganesque in their stalwart, skillful cabinet
performances.
Though Mr. Bush has advanced some dubious national legislation (most
notably his education and faith initiatives), he demonstrated early on
that substance and character trump symbolism. Accordingly, The
Federalist, just one month into President Bush's first term and amid
all the hand-wringing about the legitimacy of his election, became the
first national publication to predict he will win reelection by a
landslide in 2004 -- just as he won his second term as Governor of
Texas. (And as our friend Dick Cheney has indicated he will not be on
the ticket in '04, Bush-Rumsfeld is looking like a good fit!)
Our estimation of his leadership ability was borne out in the hours,
days and weeks following 9-11, as he established himself a most
remarkable national and world leader. The foreign policy of the United
States was forever changed by his moral clarity in declaring, "If you
harbor a terrorist, you're a terrorist. If you feed a terrorist,
you're a terrorist." This marked a sea change in policy, from the
Clinton era of lip service, to the Bush test of results orientation
and performance.
For a man discounted at the year's start as lacking gravitas, Mr. Bush
has proven to be long on substance. And the year 2001 could rightly be
cast as a study in symbolism versus substance. A preference for
symbolism invited the 9-11 terrorist strikes, but the substance of the
American people and our president's leadership have answered the
assault on our nation with forthright vigor and clarity. We have yet
to identify a single Leftist in the halls of Congress who is willing
to suggest that our nation would be better served at this juncture by
"that other guy."
The Satanic messengers of 9-11 estimated they could bring the United
States to submission by attacking what they believed were the greatest
symbols of our nation. The World Trade Center and Pentagon are
symbols, but they do not constitute our substance -- as Satan's
messengers have discovered, and will continue to discover. We are "one
nation, under God," and we will remain His!
2. Quote of the Year
"Let those who say that we must understand the reasons for terrorism
come with me to the thousands of funerals we're having in New York
City -- thousands -- and explain those insane, maniacal reasons to the
children who will grow up without fathers and mothers and to the
parents who have had their children ripped from them for no reason at
all. On this issue -- terrorism -- the United Nations must draw a
line. The era of moral
relativism between those who practice or condone terrorism, and those
nations who stand up against it, must end." --New York City Mayor Rudy
Giuliani addressing the UN in early October. The UN always obfuscated
with "moral relativism" during the Cold War between free nations and
those under Communist enslavement, so a change during the conflict
with terrorism would be both unexpected and welcome!
On December 23rd, after much conjecture that 9-11 terror mastermind
Osama bin Laden would be named Time magazine's "Person of the Year,"
Giuliani was tapped for that recognition -- a choice The Federalist
considers excellent. Giuliani's response echoed his earlier words: "I
want to say that I was very humbled and very moved by the selection by
Time magazine. ... I believe the people of the city of New York were
selected as the people of the year, because of the very brave and
heroic way in which they responded from the first moment to the worst
attack on the United States ever in our history."
Time's managing editor Jim Kelly commented on the ultimate rejection
of bin Laden, "He is not a larger-than-life figure with broad
historical sweep.... He is smaller than life, a garden-variety
terrorist...."
3. The BIG Lie...
"It's amazing to me that there is the intransigence on the other side
when it comes to helping laid-off workers." --Senate Demo Leader Tom
Daschle
"For too long, Republicans have stopped our efforts to help the
economy and help the people who have been hardest hit." --Tom Daschle
on another occasion
"The federal government is not a toy, and checks from the U.S.
Treasury should not be used as political props." --DNC Chairman Terry
McAuliffe on the tax rebate checks returned to taxpayers by
Republican-backed legislation
"These are difficult and unusual times, but we must not run up the
national debt with risky, unfair tax measures that won't help the
economy recover. To make matters worse, the Senate Republican
leadership is now taking its marching orders from the radical House
Republicans." --Demo Sen. Harry Reid (You know what "radical" means --
willing to return overpayments to hard-pressed taxpayers!)
"The bottom line is this is George Bush's recession." --Rep. Nita
Lowey, head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (This
about the economic downturn that began on Bill Clinton's watch --
arguably as a result of his domestic policies....)
4. The "Dumb and Dumber" Department
In early October, The Federalist noted, just when you thought it was
safe to go back in the air comes this revelation: "What percent?
Eighty percent of the people checking for terrorists at Dulles Airport
are not American citizens? What is wrong with this picture?" --Rep.
Harold Rogers (R-Kentucky) to Kenneth Mead, inspector general for the
Department of Transportation, who replied, "I think it's about eighty
percent. It may be somewhat more."
5. The Last Word
"We aren't running out of targets -- Afghanistan is." --Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld responding to a reporter's inquiry about the
reduction of military strikes against Jihadistan early in the
campaign. (Interestingly, Mr. Rumsfeld's Pentagon briefings have been
termed Washington's "Best Show in Town," and a fond caricature of the
good Secretary of War graced a year-end cover of National Review,
posing him as this war's simulacrum of WWII poster pinup Betty
Grable.)
Even that bastion of Leftist "humor," NBC's Saturday Night Live, aired
a parody of a Rumsfeld press briefing, poking fun at the stupidity of
questions posed by reporters:
-- A female reporter: 'With our military campaign stalled and the
opposition forces seemingly bogged down in a quagmire, isn't there a
danger the U.S. will look like a weakling and thus lose the support of
the Afghan people?'
Rumsfeld character: 'Isn't that the same question you asked last
week?'
Reporter: 'Oh, I'm sorry. Okay, with our military moving so rapidly
and opposition forces easily overrunning Taliban areas, isn't there a
danger the U.S. will look like a bully and thus lose the support of
the Afghan people?'
-- A male reporter: 'We're getting reports of U.S. special op forces
being dropped into Taliban areas with camouflage and night vision
goggles. This means the Taliban soldiers won't be able to see our
troops, but we'll be able to see them. Is that fair?'
-- Another male reporter: 'We're being told that Northern Alliance
forces are firing back at Taliban troops who have fired on them even
though the Taliban troops missed. Does the U.S. condone that?'
Rumsfeld: 'Now what kind of question is that?'
Reporter: 'Thought provoking?'
Rumsfeld: 'No.'
Reporter: 'Incisive?'
Rumsfeld: 'No. Remember what I said about your question the other
day?'
Reporter: 'That it was idiotic?'
Rumsfeld: 'And?'
Reporter: 'And that I am an embarrassment both to myself and to my
newspaper?'
Rumsfeld: 'That's right.'
6. Upright
For consistently wise and witty political commentary, we turned to a
friend, longtime Ronald Reagan hand, Lyn Nofziger, and this year was
no exception:
(Wise) "There seems little doubt that a tough and determined president
could have ridded the world of bin Laden years before he was able to
plan and carry out the attacks of Sept. 11."
(Witty) "Bin Laden thinks Yankees are bad / And calls for a holy
jihad. But he'll learn
too late / That he shouldn't tempt fate / By making those Yankees real
mad."
7. Dezinformatsia
Top "prize" for this year's best (worst?) example of press
disinformation goes to Fox News, which hired Geraldo Rivera in the
heat of the war against Jihadistan, putting him in the field with
America's finest defenders, and not firing this phony Leftist dupe
immediately when he was caught in an act of his trademark sensational
lying.
Rivera's big money shot in Afghanistan (thus far) was a tearful
choked-up report on Dec. 6 from "Kandahar -- hallowed ground.... [I]
walked over the spot where the friendly fire took so many of our, our
men.... It was just, the whole place, just fried, really, and bits of
uniforms and tattered clothing everywhere. I said the Lord's Prayer
and really choked up." Problem is, this Leftmedia Clintonista
prevaricator was hundreds of miles from where the incident actually
occurred -- all the way across Afghanistan.
Rivera claims the "fog of war" caused him to confuse the Kandahar
incident with the "friendly fire" deaths in Tora Bora. Problem is,
the Tora Bora incident occurred at least three days after Rivera's
Dec. 6 report. On Rivera's brash arrogance after his on-camera antics
claiming that he just dodged a sniper bullet, even his own cameraman
remarked, "They don't make a helmet big enough for his head."
"It was an honest mistake," claimed Fox News in a press release.
"Based on Geraldo Rivera's 30-year track record, Fox News has full
confidence in his explanation and journalistic integrity. This is not
the first, nor will it be the last, mistake made in a war zone." With
that statement, Fox just dug itself in deeper.
Fox gained its successes by treating conservatives and conservative
ideas with a reasonable degree of fairness, this year besting chief
cable news rival CNN in the ratings games. However, once Fox had
conservatives "locked up" in their viewer base, the network
immediately began an "outreach" campaign to appeal to Leftist viewers.
Bringing Rivera aboard was almost as nescient as Fox's decision to
hire Clintonista former Energy Secretary "China Bill" Richardson as an
"analyst."
Memo to Fox News: Achieving success with conservative backing, then
turning your back on conservatives as "having no place else to go"
usually does not work out well. Just ask the Republican National
Committee!
P.S. We dare Bill O'Reilly to spin this one....
8. Sociocrats
"Just as we need to examine the contents of our own colons, we need to
examine the contents of our government." --Author Alice Walker, at a
rally for quintessential Sociocrat Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA), comparing
the contents of the Bush administration to the contents of her bowel
before her recent 10-day fast. (Lee, you may recall, was the lone
dissenting vote in the House measure in support of President Bush's
actions against Afghanistan.)
9. Village Idiots
The Village Matriarch herself, Ms. Hillary Rodham-Clinton, was booed
off the stage at this fall's Concert for New York -- much to the
surprise of her handlers. The most vigorous jeering came from New York
firefighters and police officers in the front rows. Firefighter
Michael Moran, brother of Battalion Chief John Moran, who died under
the rubble of 9-11, summed up his colleagues' opinion: "She wants to
spew her nonsense -- she doesn't believe the things she says. I don't
think there has ever been a sincere word that has ever come out of her
mouth." Another Village Celeb, actor Richard Gere, was also booed from
the stage after commenting, "I think in the [attack on Bin Laden]
right now...we can turn it into compassion and love and
understanding."
10. Short Cuts
"When I take action, I'm not going to fire a $2 million missile at an
empty $10 tent and hit a camel in the butt." --President Bush,
distinguishing between his response to terrorism and that of Bill
Clinton -- who failed to respond substantively after the first assault
on the World Trade Center in 1993 by Islamic extremists -- or to any
of their subsequent assaults around the world.
______----********O********----______
PUBLISHER'S YEAR-END NOTE
Thank you, our loyal readers, for making this a very successful year
for The Federalist.
For new and seasoned readers alike, please take a moment to acquaint
or reacquaint yourselves with our publication.
Perhaps the most often asked question we receive is, "Who are you?"
The reason for the notable absence of individual identities for our
editors is, in a word, humilitas. It is out of humility and uniformity
of purpose that we do not promote the personalities associated with
The Federalist. Our objective is to convey the central theme of
liberty, "that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by
their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." These God-given rights
are timeless and originate, as noted by our Founders, with the Author
of life.
Breaking with publishing convention, The Federalist promotes the
commerce of ideas without promoting personalities. We have no
propensity for self-aggrandizement in this era when the stature of
media icons tends to overshadow the real-estate of ideas. However, if
you have questions or inquiries, our executive editor, Mark Alexander,
may be reached by e-mail to <Edi...@Federalist.com>
Also contrary to publishing convention, The Federalist depends on the
goodwill and voluntary support of our readers -- creating some
consternation among our accountants and bankers. We believe this
method of fair trade represents the purest form of free enterprise and
is, thus, in keeping with the spirit of our publication. Your
goodwill has provided for The Federalist's publication and
distribution since its inception, exposing the ideas expressed in its
pages to an ever-increasing audience including, notably, political,
media and academic groups, which would not otherwise pay for
conservative views.
Another question we receive is, "Why do you call yourselves 'The
Federalist'?" The Federalist is an advocate of individual rights and
responsibilities as ordained by God and established in the
governmental context framed by our nation's Founders as they specified
in our Declaration of Independence and its subordinate guidance, our
Republic's Constitution, as explicated by The Federalist Papers. We
believe that role for a central government as defined by The
Federalists of 1787, Madison, Jay and Hamilton, was and remains the
correct role -- but the constitutional federalism they supported has
been grossly violated in the 225 years since our Founding. We believe
that there is a need for a "strong central government" as defended in
the Federalist Papers. But, read the Papers and you will quickly
discover how far the role of government advocated by contemporary
Leftists has departed from the sound and reasoned notion of that role
as defined by our Constitution as ratified in 1787.
Regarding the tone of The Federalist, let us just say that we only
have a few thousand words with which to rebut the blizzard of
Leftmedia print and broadcast effluent each week. And as for why we
refer to our opposition as "Leftists" -- because the Left has hijacked
the political lexicon. "Liberal" is a reference to our libertarian
friends -- and no self-respecting conservative should ever refer to a
Leftist as a "liberal." Old Tom Jefferson would have no part in such
folly!
About the "religious" content in The Federalist -- we do not subscribe
to the errant "separation of church and state" dogma. We know what the
Founders had to say about the integral role of faith in government,
and we know what Thomas Jefferson meant when referencing "a wall of
separation" in his 1801 letter to the Danbury Baptists. None
anticipated the secular cleansing of all levels of government enforced
by judicial activists today. The Federalist is written, edited and
published by men and women who are Christians. We believe that our
national foundation rests on Judeo-Christian principles. We do not
hide, or conversely, hide behind, our faith. And we should note that
we advocate for a nation of Christians -- not a Christian nation.
The Federalist is now the most widely subscribed e-journal on the
Internet. But our rapid circulation growth has not come without
enormous costs -- both professional and operational. Publishing
deadlines are relentless. And our operational expenses cover the costs
of senior editors, editors, research staff, technical staff and
software writers. Publishing requires technical hardware, hardware
installations and offices, computer equipment, etc. We also have
substantial legal, accounting and insurance costs. (We remind you that
our Editorial Board and Executive Editor serve without compensation.)
In our efforts to make our publication more reader friendly this year,
we moved to a thrice-weekly publication schedule, adding a Wednesday
Chronicle to the Brief (now published Mondays) and Friday's Digest. We
also offered our readers the option of choosing to receive e-mail
editions in text only, HTML printer-friendly text, or PDF format
attachment for the Brief, Chronicle and Digest. (Of course, each can
be accessed from the new URL --
http://www.Federalist.com/current2002.asp beginning with Federalist
#02-01.) If you did not receive an expected publication, you can also
have any edition e-mailed to you from this page. Please BOOKMARK this
URL for future reference.
From the Executive Editor, Editorial Board and staff of The
Federalist, THANK YOU for your support and vigilance. In the coming
year, we hope you will find The Federalist indispensable in your
efforts to avoid the abyss of political, social and media liberalism,
and a good resource in your resolution to stand firm for the
"unalienable rights" endowed by our Creator -- the fundamental rights
of all people. We hope and pray this will be a prosperous year for
you and your families!
-- PUBLIUS --
FREE OFFER -- Get your Federalist bumper slogans so you can help drive
traffic in the "right" direction. Send a self-addressed stamped #10
(business size) envelope (SASE) to Federalist Fulfillment Services,
P.O. Box 507, Chattanooga, TN 37402-0507, and we will send you two
high quality bumper stickers -- one with our trademark slogan "Annoy a
Liberal" and the other with "The Federalist, It's Right, It's Free!"
SUBSCRIBE: FREE by E-mail! Get your FREE subscription to The
Federalist! Link to -- http://www.Federalist.com/subscribe.asp OR if
you don't have Web access, send a blank e-mail to:
<fedlist-...@thefed.com> and you will be subscribed
automatically.
SUBSCRIBE A LIST: To add multiple subscribers,
Link to -- http://www.Federalist.com/addmultiple.asp
PRIVACY NOTICE: We do NOT provide any information about our members to
any third party under any circumstances.
*To purchase a book from the Patriot's Library, Link to --
http://www.federalist.com/books.asp
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
SUPPORT THE FEDERALIST: Our mission and operations are funded entirely
by the voluntary financial support of our readers. If you have
Internet access, please link to our Support page at --
http://www.federalist.com/supportfed.asp If you prefer to support us
by check, please make your check payable to "The Federalist."
Suggested contribution levels are: Individual -- $20, Family -- $35,
Corporate and Professional -- $50, Advocate -- $100 and Founder --
$250. Send your membership contribution to: Federalist Fulfillment
Services, P.O. Box 507, Chattanooga, TN 37402-0507
Note: To avoid the plethora of IRS regulations on the editorial
content of "charitable" publications (and targeted audits against
conservative organizations), we do not declare "charitable" tax
status.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR: Our servers automatically delete "Reply"
messages to this e-mail. To submit an editorial comment, and read
other comments, link to: http://www.Federalist.com/postededs.asp or
e-mail your comment to: comm...@Federalist.com (RE editing errors:
We put at least one error in every issue just to see if you are paying
attention!)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
EDITOR'S NOTE REGARDING THE CITATION OF SOURCES: In an effort to
accurately represent opinions and belief systems, The Federalist uses
direct quotes from reliable sources. We make every effort to ensure
the accuracy of each quote and, thus, do not post full citations for
quotes from noted historical or public figures, policy analysts,
journalists or opinionists, who can readily be identified through an
Internet search. For a listing of our primary text sources, link to:
http://www.Federalist.com/linkssources.asp The Good News passage is
from the NIV translation unless otherwise noted.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Questions or comments about The Federalist may be directed to the
Executive Editor, Mark Alexander, or Senior Editors Cassandra Cornell
and Brett Anthony at Edi...@Federalist.com
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Contact President Bush -- <pres...@whitehouse.gov>
White House switchboard: (202) 456-1414
Contact your Senator --
http://www.senate.gov/senators/senator_by_state.cfm
Contact your Representative --
http://www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW.html
House and Senate switchboard: (202) 224-3121
Links to Central Government Agencies -- http://www.firstgov.gov/
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Subscribers agree to the terms of the Subscriber/User Disclaimer at:
http://www.Federalist.com/disclaimer.asp
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
For more information on The Federalist's editorial board and policies,
information resources, reprint and forward rules, etc., link to --
http://www.federalist.com/info/footer.asp
Visit the most comprehensive tribute to Ronald Reagan on the Internet
and read the definitive conservative platform for the next century --
http://www.Reagan2000.com/
"But select capable men from all the people -- men who fear God,
trustworthy men who hate dishonest gain -- and appoint them as
officials over thousands, hundreds, fifties and tens." (Exodus 18:21)
++ "Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord..." (Psalm 33:12a)
The Federalist (r) All rights reserved.
The Federalist is a Town Hall Citizen Organization
2002 (c)Publius Press, Inc. ><>
Jim Simpson;
CB wrote:
"Real bigotry is terrorist's coming to kill American's for the purpose of
stopping Western influence and Christian expansion."
"I call people nigger who use lies and real bigotry to hurt people.
It's one thing to debate policy and the politics of personal
destruction, it's another to give credit for my deeds."
"I use the word nigger, no one else does so don't attempt to
degrade others with speech you deem inappropriate, be tolerant,
bigot."
"I do not subscribe to being politically correct. Liberals have
adultered the English language, even the word "nigger". It used
mean "a low down and dirty (minded) person, having nothing
to do with race and that describes anyone that uses filthy language."
" Nigger Al Sharpton Faces Arrest! "
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=nigger+author%3ACB&hl=en&btnG=Google+Search
From: CB (C...@prayforme.com)
Subject: Re: Nigger Al Sharpton Faces Arrest!
Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican
Date: 2001-01-19 18:26:07 PST
Webster once described a nigger as a low down dirty person. Why now does
Webster define nigger as one being Afro-American or black?
"The only "thing" you could beat is TimUsimians...up and down"
"Not only are you a low down an dirty person, your a lying sack"
DASS'HOLE DENIES IT
Subject: Re: Road Block for Tax Breaks - Richard A. Gephardt - "I'm
getting
pessimistic. I'm getting worried"
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 07:13:46 -0800
From: "CB" <C...@prayforme.com>
Organization: CompuServe Interactive Services
"Look what I found, asshole."
"I will support Reverend Peterson, he ain't no nigger".
.. Jesse Jackson "is".
CB
for your self. The left have you and the ACLU laugh at you as their slave.
Niggers aren't a race of people, their ugly, mean and vulgar people having
NOTHING to do with race!!!. Anyone who tries to stereotype a whole race of
people and degrade them like you are racist bigots.
I don't care what color people are. Liberals have a label for anyone who
thinks for themselves.
I use the word "nigger" to describe those who degrade others so ugly no
other word comes close in character recognition. When people who are widely
loved and the recently departed are made fun of, using real nasty language,
having maggots dropping from your dass'hole, there isn't any shock value for
shaming the inappropriate. It's like if I went around and said Rosell, the
fag, who smokes crack and thinks up ways to tweak yours truly is just
himself a little cock roach playing the role of "Mimic" walking around
looking and behaving like Gods creature.
If there were a scale that measured my use of the word nigger to Rossell's
use of the word "cunt", "maggot infested" what ever, there's no comparison.
Real bigotry has come to America to kill. A cult of real racists are on
American soil, killing anyone who is American. How the heck do I get a bigot
label, SZARgoth is one of many who will die without hope of a life beyond
cunts and other shit. If people are so shallow to think that MY use of the
"n" word to describe "low down and dirty people is some how equitable with
SZARgoths' vulgarity, then sting me up and kill me.
CB
"Jim Simpson;" <"Simpians;"@iname.com> wrote in message
news:3C2D1A6F...@iname.com...
harrison numbugger
CB wrote:
>
> Your hate for me is a reflection of your inability to rassinalize and think
> for your self.
peoples hate for you is based on your bigotry , your ignorance and your
hatred of anyone and everyone who wont goose step into line behind the
little fascists in the oval office.
> The left have you and the ACLU laugh at you as their slave.
huh? what in the hell does that mean? you CB would probably be a slave
if it wasn't for the ACLU. what your little mind fails to comprehend is
that every time the ACLU wins a victory for someone you hate , YOUR
freedom is more secure.
> Niggers aren't a race of people, their ugly, mean and vulgar people having
> NOTHING to do with race!!!.
buy a dictionary.
nigger n : ethnic slur; offensive name for Black person [syn: spade,
coon, jigaboo, nigra]
>Anyone who tries to stereotype a whole race of
> people and degrade them like you are racist bigots.
>
you are the bigot CB. in nearly every post you make you prove that.
> I don't care what color people are.
that may true, you hate nearly everyone.
> Liberals have a label for anyone who
> thinks for themselves.
>
yes , and that label is LIBERAL.
> I use the word "nigger" to describe those who degrade others so ugly no
> other word comes close in character recognition. When people who are widely
> loved and the recently departed are made fun of, using real nasty language,
> having maggots dropping from your dass'hole, there isn't any shock value for
> shaming the inappropriate. It's like if I went around and said Rosell, the
> fag, who smokes crack and thinks up ways to tweak yours truly is just
> himself a little cock roach playing the role of "Mimic" walking around
> looking and behaving like Gods creature.
>
> If there were a scale that measured my use of the word nigger to Rossell's
> use of the word "cunt", "maggot infested" what ever, there's no comparison.
>
> Real bigotry has come to America to kill.
oh how profound (not). real bigotry CB comes people like you who feel
that they have the god given right to impose their ridiculous religious
mythology and fascist political beliefs on others. yes, the hijackers
were bigots, but not more so then you CB. YOu are just like them.
>A cult of real racists are on
> American soil, killing anyone who is American. How the heck do I get a bigot
> label,
read some of your posts. you hate homosexuals, blacks, arabs, muslims
and anyone else who doesn't bow down and kiss the ass of ashcroft and
crusader bunnypants etc etc. you are a bigot.
> SZARgoth is one of many who will die without hope of a life beyond
> cunts and other shit. If people are so shallow to think that MY use of the
> "n" word to describe "low down and dirty people is some how equitable with
> SZARgoths' vulgarity, then sting me up and kill me.
>
sounds tempting CB, but killing those who think differently is a
preoccupation of the right.
Jim Simpson;
CB wrote:
> Your hate for me is a reflection
Self grandizing there again Cunt Butt. I hate any message or person
that wishes to take away rights as if they are on some moral pedestal
better than others. Anytime you use the word nigger and name
a black there is no other connotation applied to the word than their
race. Notice how you single out Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton,
this in not because they are liberals it is because they are black.
Now tell us how you feel about intersexuals and homosexuals marring.
> of your inability to rassinalize and think
> for your self. The left have you and the ACLU laugh at you as their slave.
> Niggers aren't a race of people, their ugly, mean and vulgar people having
> NOTHING to do with race!!!.
Unless you always use it for Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, as you
do then it is what it is. You are a bigot no matter what label you
put on it you use the word liberal as those that use the word nigger
to degrade them and to effect control over them. Cowards like
you cannot allow others to be who they are without having some
control over them. At least in your perverted little minds.
> Anyone who tries to stereotype a whole race of
> people and degrade them like you are racist bigots.
Sorry that would be you, calling people liberals, faggots or
niggers makes you the bigot there bub.
>
>
> I don't care what color people are. Liberals have a label for anyone who
> thinks for themselves.
Thinks for themselves straight out of the bible and what their collective
tells them, how deluded you are.
Resistance it futile, we are Bork.
CB
original post describing or calling them the "n" word. People have posed
articles which I have responded to but never have I called either of those
men "nigger", ever!
"Jim Simpson;" <"Simpians;"@iname.com> wrote in message
news:3C2DCBD4...@iname.com...
DEVIL,HANDSOME
I have started removing
offensive words from the heading when I reply. See above.
"CB" <C...@prayforme.com> wrote in message
news:a0kpvg$3av$1...@suaar1aa.prod.compuserve.com...
Jim Simpson;
CB wrote:
> I have never included the names of Jesse Jackson or Al Shartpon in a
> original post describing or calling them the "n" word. People have posed
> articles which I have responded to but never have I called either of those
> men "nigger", ever!
Christian lie so often they start believing their own lies, like there
is really a god.
CB
was
--
_______________________
From: Gentleman Jim (jim...@juno.com)
Subject: Nigger Al Sharpton Faces Arrest!
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power, alt.politics.nationalism.white,
alt.activism, alt.activism.student, alt.politics.usa,
alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.politics.equality, alt.feminism
View this article only
Date: 2001-01-17 19:18:25 PST
Nation: Warrants issued for Rev. Al Sharpton over unpaid fines
The Associated Press
ST. LOUIS (January 17, 2001 8:30 a.m. EST http://www.nandotimes.com) -
A judge has issued two arrest warrants for the Rev. Al Sharpton over
$600 in unpaid fines for his role in a 1999 protest that shut down
Interstate 70.
The warrants mean the civil rights activist could be arrested the next
time he comes to St. Louis.
Sharpton must appear before Associate Circuit Judge Jack Garvey to
settle the warrants and pay the fines plus $200 in additional court
costs.
Sharpton's lawyer, Randall Cahill, had no comment on the warrants
Tuesday.
Minutes after jurors returned their verdict against Sharpton on Dec.
11, the civil rights leader said it would be "a privilege" to pay the
$600 in fines. But he didn't meet Friday's deadline to pay the fines
and court costs.
Sharpton had joined more than 120 other protesters in blocking the
interstate. Demonstrators were seeking greater minority participation
in highway contracts.
Comment:
It's time to put this nigger behind bars.
_______________
All of the above was posted by JIM, not CB
bu...@moron.com
a right wing nut;
>"Jim Simpson;" <"Simpians;"@iname.com> wrote in message
>news:3C2DD4F3...@iname.com...
>>
>>
>> CB wrote:
>>
>> > I have never included the names of Jesse Jackson or Al Shartpon in a
>> > original post describing or calling them the "n" word. People have posed
>> > articles which I have responded to but never have I called either of
>those
>> > men "nigger", ever!
>>
>> Christian lie so often they start believing their own lies, like there
>> is really a god.
>>
>> "I will support Reverend Peterson, he ain't no nigger".
>> .. Jesse Jackson "is".
>>
>Again you lie, chase that post down to the origanl author and you'll find it
>was
------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001 15:02:51 -0700, "CB" <C...@prayforme.com> wrote like a right wing nut;
>
>"Sherwood" <ensey_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:9746ed4a.0109...@posting.google.com...
>
>I never called any black the "N" word. I'll call you a nigger though.
>
>Sherwood, your a nigger!
CB
Your quick to repeat what I say but ashamed of what you and others say to
provoke a scolding
<bu...@moron.com> wrote in message news:3c2e7a5d...@news.enetis.net...
bu...@moron.com
a right wing nut;
>I did, post what he said to deserve that!!!
So, you're claiming that "deserving" absolves YOU from posting racist
stuff, eh halfwit?
Not only are you a pathetic racist and homophobic slimebag, you mouth
the same excuses every low-life uses..........a perverted moral
imperative.
***********************************************
"The (ten) Commandments carry no internal
evidence of divinity with them; they
contain some good moral precepts, such
as any man qualified to be a law-giver,
or a legislator, could produce himself,
without having recourse to supernatural
intervention."
------------Thomas Paine, Founder
Sherwood
> I did, post what he said to deserve that!!!
Trying to imply that I used the "N" word again, huh, CB????
You're nothing but a red necked ignorant dumb ass bigot CB, and that
is what you are when you are operating at your best and highest level
of intelligence.
Most of the time you are nothing more than a pathetic and whimpering
coward CB, but of course, being stupic and backwards is just one of
the things that red neck bigots like you do best CB.
>
> <bu...@moron.com> wrote in message news:3c2e7a5d...@news.enetis.net...
> > On Sat, 29 Dec 2001 16:35:48 -0800, "CB" <C...@prayforme.com> wrote like
> > a right wing nut;
> > >
> > >"Jim Simpson;" <"Simpians;"@iname.com> wrote in message
> > >news:3C2DD4F3...@iname.com...
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> CB wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I have never included the names of Jesse Jackson or Al Shartpon in a
> > >> > original post describing or calling them the "n" word. People have
> posed
> > >> > articles which I have responded to but never have I called either of
> those
> > >> > men "nigger", ever!
> > >>
> > >> Christian lie so often they start believing their own lies, like there
> > >> is really a god.
> > >>
> > >> "I will support Reverend Peterson, he ain't no nigger".
> > >> .. Jesse Jackson "is".
> > >>
> > >Again you lie, chase that post down to the origanl author and you'll find
> it
> > >was
> > WHO WROTE THIS, THEN CBLOON:
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > On Wed, 5 Sep 2001 15:02:51 -0700, "CB" <C...@prayforme.com> wrote like a
> right wing nut;
> >
> >
Jim Simpson;
CB wrote:
> "Jim Simpson;" <"Simpians;"@iname.com> wrote in message
> news:3C2DD4F3...@iname.com...
> >
> >
> > CB wrote:
> >
> > > I have never included the names of Jesse Jackson or Al Shartpon in a
> > > original post describing or calling them the "n" word. People have posed
> > > articles which I have responded to but never have I called either of
> those
> > > men "nigger", ever!
> >
> > Christian lie so often they start believing their own lies, like there
> > is really a god.
> >
> > "I will support Reverend Peterson, he ain't no nigger".
> > .. Jesse Jackson "is".
> >
> Again you lie, chase that post down to the origanl author and you'll find it
> was
Even amoung liars the natural state of christians you are
extrordinary in your prolific lying.
"I will support Reverend Peterson, he ain't no nigger".
Jackson "is".
CB
"Jim Simpson;" <"Simpians;"@iname.com> wrote in message
news:3C2F8DE6...@iname.com...
Courtney Love
Ooh, "scumbag." Gosh, that sures sounds like vulgar language to me. You're
being hypocritical again, CB, so practice what you preach and get on board that
express train to Hell. Or do you just go to church on Sunday and ask God to
forgive you for this?
EERRGGGHHHH!!!!
CB
"Courtney Love" <clove...@aol.comdotcom> wrote in message
news:20020101204012...@mb-mm.aol.com...