RUSH LIMBAUGH CAN KISS MY ASS!
Gabrielle Daniels
On Mon, 1 Jan 1996, Big Daddy wrote something adoringly about the Fat
Man, and I don't mean Sidney Greenstreet, who got caught in the "Maltese
Falcon":
>Name a few of these lies, liberal. Sure, he's made mistakes, but you make it
>sound like he's deliberatly mistating the truth in order to perpetuate an
>agenda. Besides, when he's made a mistake he's man enough to admit it unlike
>that goofball in the White House.
When has Rush admitted any factual errors he's made? According to him, he
doesn't make any. He spouted this during a preview for an upcoming
documentary. He always tells you the truth. That would make any sane
thinking person pause.
I suggest you Dittoheads and Flush Rush Haters (of which I am proudly am
one) tune into your local PBS channel and check out the Frontline
documentary series' examination of "Rush Limbaugh's America." You'll
probably find your answers right there.
It's showing this week in the L.A. area.
Rush is nothing but lies, hot air and bombast on two legs. His time is
coming, like Morton Downey, Jr. and Jimmy Swaggart.
dab...@aloha.com
>In article <4c5l7a$s...@klein.delphi.com>, dab...@aloha.com wrote:
>> gpr...@erc.cat.syr.edu (Gene Price) wrote:
>> Rush does have some good ideas, to dismiss all of them out of hand is
>> pretty foolish, however over the last few years his show has become
>> little more than his coming on the air to perform self-gratification.
>> "See folks I was right" "didn't I tell you etc, etc, etc"
>> His views on the envronment are for the most part callow.
>>
>> Rush is too far right just as Bill is too far left. Our country was
>> founded on compromise and we need to start getting back to center.
>The country IS in the center, thanks to the opposing forces of liberals
>(?) like Bill and conservatives (!) like Rush. If you're suggesting that
>everyone become centrist, I heartily disagree. That would take all the
>fun out of it.
> -Greg Ferrar (fer...@uiuc.edu)
No I am not. Lets look at medicare. Both parties want to reduce
"growth" aka spending but niether side will come to the table and
really discuss it and try to meet somewhere in the middle. Instead
we have them calling each other names and engaging in useless
rhetoric.
The only thing that I want to see everyone as is equal. ( in terms of
opportunity)
"...I have never known much good done by those who affected to trade
for the public good. It is an affection,indeed,not very common
among merchants, and very few words need be employed in dissuading them from it."
-Adam Smith
Greg Ferrar
> fer...@uiuc.edu (Greg Ferrar) wrote:
>
> >In article <4c5l7a$s...@klein.delphi.com>, dab...@aloha.com wrote:
> >> Rush is too far right just as Bill is too far left. Our country was
> >> founded on compromise and we need to start getting back to center.
>
> >The country IS in the center, thanks to the opposing forces of liberals
> >(?) like Bill and conservatives (!) like Rush. If you're suggesting that
> >everyone become centrist, I heartily disagree. That would take all the
> >fun out of it.
>
> No I am not. Lets look at medicare. Both parties want to reduce
> "growth" aka spending but niether side will come to the table and
> really discuss it and try to meet somewhere in the middle. Instead
> we have them calling each other names and engaging in useless
> rhetoric.
Both sides HAVE been talking about the budget and Medicare, for weels.
Eventually they will have to find a middle ground. The compromise will
have to be centrist. In the foreground we have name calling and rhetoric,
but behind the scenes we clearly see Clinton, Dole, and Gingrich talking
and compromising. Therefore I believe that the country is already in the
center.
> The only thing that I want to see everyone as is equal. ( in terms of
> opportunity)
This is a very vague statement. Almost everyone agree with this
statement, but people assign dramatically different meanings to it.
Liberals and socialists mean that everyone should be provided with a lot
of money and services to provide for all their needs. Conservatives and
libertarians mean that nobody should be denied anything that might
interfere with their "equality." Which are you?
-Greg Ferrar (fer...@uiuc.edu)
Conrad
<Pine.SUN.3.91.960101...@arcturus.oac.uci.edu>,
Gabrielle(The Hater) Daniels <gdan...@arcturus.oac.uci.edu>
wrote:
>
>On Mon, 1 Jan 1996, Big Daddy wrote something adoringly about
the Fat
>Man, and I don't mean Sidney Greenstreet, who got caught in the
"Maltese
>Falcon":
>
>>Name a few of these lies, liberal. Sure, he's made mistakes,
but you make it
>>sound like he's deliberatly mistating the truth in order to
perpetuate an
>>agenda. Besides, when he's made a mistake he's man enough to
admit it unlike
>>that goofball in the White House.
>
>When has Rush admitted any factual errors he's made?
When he learns he has made an error he leads off his next show
with a correction.
According to him, he
>doesn't make any.
No, he just claims to be 98.x% accurate.
He spouted this during a preview for an upcoming
>documentary. He always tells you the truth. That would make any
sane
>thinking person pause.
>
>I suggest you Dittoheads and Flush Rush Haters
Yes, you really are a hateful person, arn't you?
(of which I am proudly am
>one) tune into your local PBS channel and check out the
Frontline
>documentary series' examination of "Rush Limbaugh's America."
You'll
>probably find your answers right there.
>
>It's showing this week in the L.A. area.
>
>Rush is nothing but lies, hot air and bombast on two legs. His
time is
>coming, like Morton Downey, Jr. and Jimmy Swaggart.
Well then it's going to be a long time coming. He's been going
strong for at least seven years. He is also making $25 million a
year doing it.
>
>
Darryl Hamilton
ohhhh he called you a....GASP... Liberal!!!
Is this supposed to embarrass you into agreeing with him or or
something??
--
____________________________________________
Darryl Hamilton |Duke University
d...@rogue.geo.duke.edu|Auxiliary Services
d...@acpub.duke.edu |Area Supervisor
rgar...@xmission.com
>>
>>Rush is nothing but lies, hot air and bombast on two legs. His
>time is
>>coming, like Morton Downey, Jr. and Jimmy Swaggart.
>Well then it's going to be a long time coming. He's been going
>strong for at least seven years. He is also making $25 million a
>year doing it.
Interesting. I could say the same thing about gangsta rap--and it is also all
hate, no substance, and quite profitable.
==============================================================
R. A. Garrard rgar...@xmission.com salt lake city, utah
==============================================================
Lee Anthoni
people is eating to compensate for a failed sex life. Food, to RUSH is
like sex, and his consumption indicates that he is a very sexually repressed
individual with extreme sexual drives that cannot be satisfied through normal
man-woman relationships. Hence, he consumes food like a PLAYBOY consumes
woman.
While the Playboy receives pleasure/control from his actions, RUSH gets
additional weight which helps to reaffirm his low self-esteem as far as how
he views himself in relationship to other people, namely woman.
Lee Anthoni
Freedom is the LIGHT for which many have died in the DARK.
==============================================================================
umo
This looks a masterpiece of self analysis.
umo
>
>Rush is not FAT. Rather he is a compulsive eater, who like most such
>people is eating to compensate for a failed sex life. Food, to RUSH is
atisfied through normal man-woman relationships. Hence, he consumes food like a PLAYBOY consumes woman.
>
>While the Playboy receives pleasure/control from his actions, RUSH gets
y woman.
>
>
>
> Freedom is the LIGHT for which many have died in the DARK.
>
>=========================================================================
This looks like a masterpiece of self-ANALysis.
Thomas F Brown
>Rush is not FAT.
Yes, those big bones in his belly just make him seem so.
Rather he is a compulsive eater, who like most such
>people is eating to compensate for a failed sex life. Food, to RUSH is
>like sex, and his consumption indicates that he is a very sexually repressed
>individual with extreme sexual drives that cannot be satisfied through normal
>man-woman relationships. Hence, he consumes food like a PLAYBOY consumes
>woman.
>
>While the Playboy receives pleasure/control from his actions, RUSH gets
>additional weight which helps to reaffirm his low self-esteem as far as how
>he views himself in relationship to other people, namely woman.
Please cite your sources. Can you prove your assertion?
WJG
ka...@snowcrest.net (Karen McFarlin) wrote:
>In article <4c5l7a$s...@klein.delphi.com>, dab...@aloha.com wrote:
>> Rush is too far right just as Bill is too far left. Our country was
>> founded on compromise and we need to start getting back to center.
>>
>>
>>
>> "...I have never known much good done by those who affected to trade
>> for the public good. It is an affection,indeed,not very common
>> among merchants, and very few words need be employed in dissuading them
>from it."
>> -Adam Smith
>
>out the Bubba bait and the neanderthals snap it up. But on almost every
>issue, to the background history of congressional actions to the
>environment...Rush lies.
>Rob Henderson
Like what?
Greg Ferrar
> >Rush Limbaugh is a liar. It's that simple. He *does* make it up! He throws
> >out the Bubba bait and the neanderthals snap it up. But on almost every
> >issue, to the background history of congressional actions to the
> >environment...Rush lies.
I feel I must correct what I see as a mistaken assumption by a lot of
people, that Rush's listeners are all "Bubbas." I did my very best to
determine the demographic breakdown of Rush's audience last night, using
the Web. Though I didn't really succeed (I didn't find a source with a
completely breakdown and numbers), I did find several articles which
discuss the breakdown. Rush's listeners DO tend to have college degrees.
They tend to have acceptable jobs, but not particularly good ones. They
tend to be male and white (those were the numbers I really wanted,
especially the gender breakdown, but I couldn't find them).
In other words, though Rush does appeal mostly to one particular segment
of the population, he does not appeal to the segment most often associated
with him. It looks like he appeals to lower-middle class suburbanites,
not lower class rednecks.
Though Rush is often factually incorrect, his audience is well enough
educated that they SHOULD be able to judge for themselves. In spite of
this, my day-to-day dealings with dittoheads indicates that they tend to
get excited by what they're hearing (since it is what they've always
wished were true), to the point that they suspend their disbelief for the
sake of feeling good about themselves. I think this shows quite clearly
how little a college degree has to do with critical thinking.
-Greg Ferrar (fer...@uiuc.edu)
Greg Ferrar
> >Rush is too far right just as Bill is too far left. Our country was
> >founded on compromise and we need to start getting back to center.
>
> soldiers and forced English armies to surrender. That's not compromise.
They compromised among themselves at every step of the process. Read a
history of the Constitution.
Compromise is the only way democracy can work. Clinton and Dole are
finally starting to act on this principle (especially Dole).
-Greg Ferrar (fer...@uiuc.edu)
Greg Ferrar
> >Rush Limbaugh is a liar. It's that simple. He *does* make it up! He throws
> >out the Bubba bait and the neanderthals snap it up. But on almost every
> >issue, to the background history of congressional actions to the
> >environment...Rush lies.
>
You must be new to this discussion. For multiple examples of Rush's false
statements, see the FAIR article (it's all over the Net). Make sure you
read Rush's rebuttal (also all over the Net), and note in particular that
Rush didn't respond to most of FAIR's points.
-Greg Ferrar (fer...@uiuc.edu)
WJG
bhol...@ix.netcom.com (Ben L. Holstrom ) wrote:
>[snipped & edited]
>ka...@snowcrest.net (Karen McFarlin) writes:
>>> Rush is too far right just as Bill is too far left. Our country was
>>> founded on compromise and we need to start getting back to center.
>>>
>>Rush Limbaugh is a liar. It's that simple. He *does* make it up! He
>throws
>>out the Bubba bait and the neanderthals snap it up. But on almost
>every
>>issue, to the background history of congressional actions to the
>>environment...Rush lies.
>
>Greetings:
>Sorry to have this posted on so many Newsgroups, but the original
>sender is responsible for posting to all of these.
>
>Nevertheless, I wholly comport to these views about the human smowman.
>Moreover, Fatboy is a meanspirited propaganist. Akin to a *Tokyo*
And you're not?
>Rose.* In reality, he has become so damn predictiably booring with
>regards to same old hateful propaganda. The begining, body and ending
>of the radio show from this oaf is soooo very boorrring. I tried to
>listen to at least his beginging monologue, but it's empty, void and
>without any social redeemable values in market place of ideals. Does
>Fatboy still do that thing about, *Let me do your thinking for you*?
>Yea, right. Now that's very democratic. Look what happen to
>Germany....
>bh
WJG
Gabrielle Daniels <gdan...@arcturus.oac.uci.edu> wrote:
>
>On Mon, 1 Jan 1996, Big Daddy wrote something adoringly about the Fat
>Man, and I don't mean Sidney Greenstreet, who got caught in the "Maltese
>Falcon":
>
>>Name a few of these lies, liberal. Sure, he's made mistakes, but you make
it
>>sound like he's deliberatly mistating the truth in order to perpetuate an
>>agenda. Besides, when he's made a mistake he's man enough to admit it unlike
>>that goofball in the White House.
>
Several times. For instance when he was discussing the PETA-squirrel thing
that was written in a "newletter."
>doesn't make any. He spouted this during a preview for an upcoming
>documentary. He always tells you the truth. That would make any sane
>thinking person pause.
>
>I suggest you Dittoheads and Flush Rush Haters (of which I am proudly am
>one) tune into your local PBS channel and check out the Frontline
>documentary series' examination of "Rush Limbaugh's America." You'll
>probably find your answers right there.
>
>It's showing this week in the L.A. area.
>
>Rush is nothing but lies, hot air and bombast on two legs. His time is
Like what?
WJG
Lee Anthoni <l...@primenet.com> wrote:
>
>Rush is not FAT. Rather he is a compulsive eater, who like most such
>people is eating to compensate for a failed sex life. Food, to RUSH is
>like sex, and his consumption indicates that he is a very sexually repressed
>individual with extreme sexual drives that cannot be satisfied through normal
>man-woman relationships. Hence, he consumes food like a PLAYBOY consumes
>woman.
>
>While the Playboy receives pleasure/control from his actions, RUSH gets
>additional weight which helps to reaffirm his low self-esteem as far as how
>he views himself in relationship to other people, namely woman.
>
Then why has he been losing weight?
>
>
> Freedom is the LIGHT for which many have died in the DARK.
>
>=============================================================================
=
>
WJG
>Rush does have some good ideas, to dismiss all of them out of hand is
>pretty foolish, however over the last few years his show has become
>little more than his coming on the air to perform self-gratification.
>"See folks I was right" "didn't I tell you etc, etc, etc"
>His views on the envronment are for the most part callow.
>
>founded on compromise and we need to start getting back to center.
The Founding Fathers did not compromise with England. They killed their
dab...@aloha.com
>> The only thing that I want to see everyone as is equal. ( in terms of
>> opportunity)
>This is a very vague statement. Almost everyone agree with this
>statement, but people assign dramatically different meanings to it.
>Liberals and socialists mean that everyone should be provided with a lot
>of money and services to provide for all their needs. Conservatives and
>libertarians mean that nobody should be denied anything that might
>interfere with their "equality." Which are you?
> -Greg Ferrar (fer...@uiuc.edu)
Fair question.
I mean that everyone should have a fair chance to reach the goals they
set for them selves ,if they have put in the hard work and dedication
needed to attain thouse goals and that they should not be denied these
because of gender, race or religion.
It also means that thouse who don't posses the skills and don't do
anything to earn them should not get perferential treatment.
Matt Giwer
>Though Rush is often factually incorrect, his audience is well enough
>educated that they SHOULD be able to judge for themselves. In spite of
>this, my day-to-day dealings with dittoheads indicates that they tend to
>get excited by what they're hearing (since it is what they've always
>wished were true), to the point that they suspend their disbelief for the
>sake of feeling good about themselves. I think this shows quite clearly
>how little a college degree has to do with critical thinking.
I have found after reading the mindless and childish words about
Limbaugh on this conference that a college education has nothing to do
with critical thinking. It certainly had nothing to do with maturity.
L...@mdli.com
In article <4cejb1$2...@lily.redrose.net>, <be...@redrose.net> writes:
>
>
> The Founding Fathers did not compromise with England. They killed their
> soldiers and forced English armies to surrender. That's not compromise.
>
Maybe, but the constitution is a compromise document. The 3/5 clause was a
compromise. Many of the founders wanted to compromise with England, but
England, being a monarchy, was not open to compromise.
If you read the Federalist Papers, you'll see that the notion of the extended
empire as a framework for a democratic republic is based on factions being
able to compromise.
Nick Maas
>While the Playboy receives pleasure/control from his actions, RUSH gets
>additional weight which helps to reaffirm his low self-esteem as far as how
>he views himself in relationship to other people, namely woman.
Why do I get the feeling you are kinda a loser and prick yourself? After all,
you do post to this newsgroup with the rest of us wackos.
Please let us know how you are such an expert on the guy's weight porblem.
Perhaps you can show us all how to keep that spare tire off, even during the
holiday season.
Lee Anthoni
[SNIPT]
: Please let us know how you are such an expert on the guy's weight porblem.
: Perhaps you can show us all how to keep that spare tire off, even during
: the holiday season.
OK
My best advice to copious individuals, such as yourself, is to stop eating.
However, the chances of the average "FAT PIG" to stop eating is extremely
small since the food is a substitute for something else.
I have heard that a "sperm diet" is the rage of the religious, far-right
when consumed from other family members or with strangers in dark alleys.
Perhaps you should give it a try. You have nothing to lose but good old
republican pork.
==========================================================================
Father of the year: Karen Smith's dad. Member of the Christian Coalition
Local Conservative Republican leader. Proponent of Family Values.
==========================================================================
Harold Brashears
see:
>On Mon, 1 Jan 1996, Big Daddy wrote something adoringly about the Fat
>Man, and I don't mean Sidney Greenstreet, who got caught in the "Maltese
>Falcon":
>>Name a few of these lies, liberal. Sure, he's made mistakes, but you make it
>>sound like he's deliberatly mistating the truth in order to perpetuate an
>>agenda. Besides, when he's made a mistake he's man enough to admit it unlike
>>that goofball in the White House.
>When has Rush admitted any factual errors he's made? According to him, he
>doesn't make any. He spouted this during a preview for an upcoming
>documentary.
I have not seen this, but then I clearly do not listen to Rush as
often as you. Presumably due to my work.
> He always tells you the truth. That would make any sane
>thinking person pause.
I take it from your comment that you believe any "sane thinking"
person must lie. Do you consider yourself such a "sane thinking"
person? If so, will you let us know when you are telling a lie, so we
can disregard you? Or would you be telling a lie then too?
>I suggest you Dittoheads and Flush Rush Haters (of which I am proudly am
>one) tune into your local PBS channel and check out the Frontline
>documentary series' examination of "Rush Limbaugh's America." You'll
>probably find your answers right there.
>It's showing this week in the L.A. area.
>Rush is nothing but lies, hot air and bombast on two legs. His time is
>coming, like Morton Downey, Jr. and Jimmy Swaggart.
Need you get so personal? I cannot condone this demonizing of anyone
who disagrees. It reminds me too much of government propagandists
dehumanizing of enemies, making it easier for soldiers to kill them.
Regards, Harold
----
"The New Deal is showing its age...It's time to move on. Our point
of departure begins with a rejection of contemporary liberalism's
central premise--that an expensive federal government is the means to
progressive ends."
--The New Democrat editorial, headlined "It's Time to Move On."
P. Marks
On 1 Jan 1996, Ben L. Holstrom wrote:
> [snipped & edited]
> ka...@snowcrest.net (Karen McFarlin) writes:
> >In article <4c5l7a$s...@klein.delphi.com>, dab...@aloha.com wrote:
> >> Rush is too far right just as Bill is too far left. Our country was
> >> founded on compromise and we need to start getting back to center.
> >> -Del
> >>
> >Rush Limbaugh is a liar. It's that simple. He *does* make it up! He
> throws
> >out the Bubba bait and the neanderthals snap it up. But on almost
> every
> >issue, to the background history of congressional actions to the
> >environment...Rush lies.
> >Rob Henderson
>
> Greetings:
> Sorry to have this posted on so many Newsgroups, but the original
> sender is responsible for posting to all of these.
>
> Nevertheless, I wholly comport to these views about the human smowman.
> Moreover, Fatboy is a meanspirited propaganist. Akin to a *Tokyo*
> Rose.* In reality, he has become so damn predictiably booring with
> regards to same old hateful propaganda. The begining, body and ending
> of the radio show from this oaf is soooo very boorrring. I tried to
> listen to at least his beginging monologue, but it's empty, void and
> without any social redeemable values in market place of ideals. Does
> Fatboy still do that thing about, *Let me do your thinking for you*?
> Yea, right. Now that's very democratic. Look what happen to
> Germany....
> bh
>
>
Several people (not edited by me in any way) all calling Rush L.
everything abusive they can think of.
He must have some strong arguments if they can not think of anything to
say against them.
As for Germany - yes they would not let people who believed that the
government had got too big (the view that Rush L. holds) in the media
(such as radio) and (of course) such views were not allowed in academia.
They ended up with a nice "caring" (unlimited) government - under Adolf
Hitler.
Paul Marks.
Mark G. Pomerleau
>
> Is this supposed to embarrass you into agreeing with him or or
> something??
>
kicked onto other persons shoes.)
I wonder if the original poster knows his/her Caps Lock is on?
Brian Sloboda
>In article <4cdbbk$k...@nnrp1.news.primenet.com> Lee Anthoni <l...@primenet.com> writes:
>
>Yes, those big bones in his belly just make him seem so.
>
>>people is eating to compensate for a failed sex life. Food, to RUSH is
>>like sex, and his consumption indicates that he is a very sexually repressed
>>individual with extreme sexual drives that cannot be satisfied through normal
>>man-woman relationships. Hence, he consumes food like a PLAYBOY consumes
>>woman.
>>
>>additional weight which helps to reaffirm his low self-esteem as far as how
>>he views himself in relationship to other people, namely woman.
>
>
Brad Underwood
Robert M Connelly
On Wednesday, 3 January, Greg Ferrar repeated one of the most fre
lies heard about Rush Limbaugh to wit that the FAIR publication
told the truth about Rush Limbaugh and that Rush's reply to FAIR
did not, in fact, make any reply - at least any of substance. It
must be pointed out that this is typical of liberals who have
little or no cognitive reasoning capabilities combined with an
inordinately low degree opf comprehensive reading abilities. It
truly is a shame when the facts are right under their noses, these
people cannot recognize them or, more likely, REFUSE to acknowledge
facts as such. It does make one wonder how, with this kind of BS
being spread so thcikly for so long, the US voter has been able to
stomach these people and their destructive political agendae and
vote for them.
I am not at all sure that many who creidt Limbaugh with being the
prime mover in the voter revolution of November 1994 are correct let
alone right: I would credit such asBill Buckley's National Review as being more
influential. But I don't think there can be any doubt that Limbaugh
was at least an influence in that revolution. That it will continue in
1996 also cannot be seriously doubted unless one has his head in a
place where the sun don't shine as most liberals posting on afl seem
to have.
--
CraigBrunelle
character. Just like you say rush substitues food for depressed sexual life. You make up for your lack of intelligence through atta=
cking the person and not his ideas.
>
>
>
>
Greg Ferrar
(Robert M Connelly) wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 3 January, Greg Ferrar repeated one of the most fre
> lies heard about Rush Limbaugh to wit that the FAIR publication
> told the truth about Rush Limbaugh and that Rush's reply to FAIR
> did not, in fact, make any reply - at least any of substance.
I'm not sure which of my posts you're referring to, but the fact is, Rush
did NOT answer anywhere near all of FAIR's corrections. I never said that
Rush didn't answer FAIR's article. The facts of the matter, as I know
the, are this: 1) he responded to a minority of their points (thereby
letting most of their corrections stand uncontested); 2) his responses,
when present, were often absurd.
I've seen Rush's response to FAIR's corrections; it can be found almost
anywhere the FAIR text is found. You might try reading Rush's response
objectively. Ask youself as you read whether Rush's explanation is
reasonable. I think that in most cases you will find that Rush's excuse
for his inaccuracy simply doesn't hold water.
-Greg Ferrar (fer...@uiuc.edu)
Jim Murphy
Maybe his mother didn't tell him what Mrs. Clinton told her son.
I have asked Forte to modify Agent
to permit me an easy way to eliminate
all the cross-posting that goes on here.
I apologize if you read this and don't care.
user
user
Mark.O.Wilson
says...
>
>In article <4cejb1$2...@lily.redrose.net>, be...@redrose.net (WJG)
>> >Rush is too far right just as Bill is too far left. Our country was
>> >founded on compromise and we need to start getting back to center.
>>
their
>> soldiers and forced English armies to surrender. That's not
compromise.
>
Read a
>history of the Constitution.
>
>Compromise is the only way democracy can work. Clinton and Dole
are
>finally starting to act on this principle (especially Dole).
According to Clinton, compromise means, you give everything I want,
and I'll stop calling you a Nazi.
--
Mark.O...@AtlantaGa.attgis.com
It ain't charity if you ain't using your own money.
Just because a mob calls itself a government, doesn't make it so.
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for
dinner.
People who claim that money doesn't matter, are usually living on
someone else's money.
Society is a mental construct, formed by those people who are too
insecure too handle the concept of people as individuals.
Mark.O.Wilson
>> >Rush Limbaugh is a liar. It's that simple. He *does* make it up! He
throws
>> >out the Bubba bait and the neanderthals snap it up. But on almost
every
>> >issue, to the background history of congressional actions to the
>> >environment...Rush lies.
>>
>
>You must be new to this discussion. For multiple examples of Rush's
false
>statements, see the FAIR article (it's all over the Net). Make sure you
>read Rush's rebuttal (also all over the Net), and note in particular that
>Rush didn't respond to most of FAIR's points.
Be sure to also read the multiple instances in which FAIR's criticisms
have been severly shredded as little more then partisan claptrap.
Quotes taken out of context, or the assumption that if Rush's expert
disagrees with your expert, then Rush is lying.
Mark.O.Wilson
>
>I have heard that a "sperm diet" is the rage of the religious, far-right
>when consumed from other family members or with strangers in dark
alleys.
The hate filled bigot makes himself heard once again.
Dr. Midnight
>
>>Please cite your sources. Can you prove your assertion?
>>Sounds like a typical liberal who is a little nervous his handout or entitlement is threatened. Can't argue the ideas so attack the=
> character. Just like you say rush substitues food for depressed sexual life. You make up for your lack of intelligence through atta=
>cking the person and not his ideas.
Actually your typical conservative tends to be sexually repressed. the louder
they are, the more they lack quality sex.
George Will, Rush Limbaugh, Pat Buchannhan, Phil Gramm.
Would YOU be caught in bed with them? I tell ya, they've been
dissed many a day, that's why they are where they are. If they
had got some good lovin', they'd be better off, and a little more
mainstream.
(Which of course explains some of the anti-Clinton feeling. Jealousy
because he's an apparent stud ...)
Nick Maas
>... RUSH gets
>additional weight which helps to reaffirm his low self-esteem as far as how
>he views himself in relationship to other people, namely woman.
What's Lee's excuse? Posting here compensates for not poking elsewhere?
S. Keller
>
> In article <4cee7j$s...@lily.redrose.net>, be...@redrose.net (WJG) wrote:
> > >Rush Limbaugh is a liar. It's that simple. He *does* make it up! He throws
> > >out the Bubba bait and the neanderthals snap it up. But on almost every
> > >issue, to the background history of congressional actions to the
> > >environment...Rush lies.
>
> people, that Rush's listeners are all "Bubbas." I did my very best
> ....It looks like he appeals to lower-middle class suburbanites,
> not lower class rednecks.
>
> Though Rush is often factually incorrect, his audience is well enough
> educated that they SHOULD be able to judge for themselves. In spite of
> this, my day-to-day dealings with dittoheads indicates that they tend to
> get excited by what they're hearing (since it is what they've always
> wished were true), to the point that they suspend their disbelief for the
> sake of feeling good about themselves. I think this shows quite clearly
> how little a college degree has to do with critical thinking.
>
Au contraire mon capitain! Your points have been read and appraised. Though
based in possible good intentions, your research has overlooked the most
obvious of sources! AM radio!(ie. Rush's show!!!) If you REALLY want to know
what the makeup of the audience is why not listen for yourself for a while?
If you don't have time to listen everyday, and most of us don't who work,
then perhaps you could tape it? If not that, then you can try the 'The
Unofficial Rush Home Page' or the 'Right Side of The Web' and ask for a copy
of daily summaries of his show.
What I find to be the case with most Rush bashers and critics, you are
obviously not listening to the show.
Continued...
--
Steve Forbes for President of the United States!
The only candidate with a positive vision for the country's future!
S. Keller
put out on the show is nothing more than an analysis of the daily events
and current issues. This is done by quoting newspaper articles,
speeches, magazine articles, etc. and then by making comments and giving
opinions as to what he makes of the event or issue in question.
The callers of the show are from all walks of life. Though they may not
be a complete cross section of his listeners,(as many people work and
have to listen to him without access to a phone or they may have to
listen after hours), but it is a pretty good representation.
Not everything that comes out on the show is meant to be 100% factual as
the show is intermixed with opinions and by definition opinions cannot be
counted as facts. Granted most of his opinions are right on target.
People who disagree with Rush are invited to call his show or email him.
The phone number and email address can be found by going to the pages
mentioned in my previous post. He invites debate. If you think you can
present a case without rambling and without ranting and raving, you can
expect to be received graciously. Just be honest with the call screener
about your disagreement and you will be put into the priority air time
line (remember there may be others in front of you that also disagree),
and you will get on before the "dittoheads".
Any questions?
Oh, and you do have a VERY valid comment in your posting. College
degrees are nothing but a piece of paper saying that you showed up to
class enough times and passed enough of the tests to graduate. It shows
nothing about critical thinking or how it was that you came to receive
the paper.
Scott K.
Gary Braswell
>
>If you did listen to the show regularly, you would realize that what is
>put out on the show is nothing more than an analysis of the daily events
>and current issues. This is done by quoting newspaper articles,
>speeches, magazine articles, etc. and then by making comments and giving
>opinions as to what he makes of the event or issue in question.
True.
>Not everything that comes out on the show is meant to be 100% factual as
>the show is intermixed with opinions and by definition opinions cannot
be
>counted as facts. Granted most of his opinions are right on target.
Then why the claims of him always being correct? As far as his opinons
go, some are on target, others are not.
>People who disagree with Rush are invited to call his show or email him.
Yeah, but its the morons who get pushed to the front of the line and of
course, they are given every opportunity to sink themselves.
As far as Email goes, from what I understand, unless you subscribe to
Compuserve, he ignores the message and you never get a reply.
>The phone number and email address can be found by going to the pages
>mentioned in my previous post. He invites debate. If you think you can
He invites debate???? Then why does he not invite people on his show to
debat him? Why has he stated he does not do debate?
>present a case without rambling and without ranting and raving, you can
>expect to be received graciously. Just be honest with the call screener
>about your disagreement and you will be put into the priority air time
>line (remember there may be others in front of you that also disagree),
>and you will get on before the "dittoheads".
And the sillier and more off the wall and outspoken you are, the faster
you get to the front. Callers are a poor substitute for people on the
show to debate. With callers you are in control, you can shut them up
whenever you want and talk all you want. With live people on the show,
you can do the same, but they will not sit there quitely. Any wonder why
he does not have them on?
>
>Any questions?
Nope, I think I covered things pretty well.<g>
>Oh, and you do have a VERY valid comment in your posting. College
>degrees are nothing but a piece of paper saying that you showed up to
>class enough times and passed enough of the tests to graduate. It shows
>nothing about critical thinking or how it was that you came to receive
>the paper.
I take it you don't have one, do you?<g>
Lucile V. Wilson
writes:
****************************************************************
By the way, Rush does not invite debate, all callers are carefully
screened.
EEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
>How is Rush any different than any other self-promoting politican that is trying to make a >buck and sfoward his own a agenda
>
The main difference is that Rush openly admits that he is "trying to make a buck".