There is a lot of talk about this flu disease and Ukranian disease
and planes spraying things and connected with a possible attempt by
the financial mafia to attack the populations.
I'm not sure whether anything of it is true, but even if it is not
true it may be part of a stepped offensive: first do this whole
circus and then it not being true. But make it threatening enough
that many of the usual people would react. And then for example
the damage turns out to be marginal, or none existent. Thus
credibility is eroded. Once sufficiently eroded (you could test
that), then launch the real attack and most ppl might not defend
themselves anymore.
The classic case is doing mock training excercizes with the army
regularly, and then one day strike at that time/place.
Maybe that can explain this strange flu story with the unhealthy
vaccin story. Meaningless threat (that flu), but with unhealthy
vaccin enough of a threat to get the 'alternatives' up against it.
Throw in some wild claims about a possibly actually existing plan
of mass genocide, then the anti-climax: sure some ppl died, some
cities where sprayed and the vaccin was unhealthy, but it's no
more then "just another scandal." And the spraying wasn't lethal,
maybe it was even healthy (??).
Then 2nd or 3rd time around: vaccin will be actually deadly, what
would be sprayed being a coctail of highly contageous deadly
diseases, maybe on the back-drop of a war and cutting off the
food .... well i should stop before giving the enemy ideas.
In other words: even if this thing is nothing, those responsible
for this useless flu story might still have to be prosecuted harshy
and their businesses collapsed, because this thing being "just another
scandal" may be true or may be part of a strategic plan ... (I'm
pretty sure the top ppl are crazy enough for it, judging from all
the wars they have started.)
http://www.socialism.nl <<-- Do that if you want te elites removed
from power. Do nothing (or the usually ineffective politically stuff)
if you want to find out by trial and error what the top has in mind.
Interesting to note that these Usenet groups, suposedly about socialism
& revolution: they're basically empty, and no meaningful debate is
occuring. Doesn't that mean that the people simply don't care one
way or the other ?
I note that with the way humanity is using up the planet: if the
elite's don't kill most, nature eventually will (through exhaustion,
loss of human habitat). It's the natural way, any animal that uses
up its habitat then gets killed off. The difference with humanity
is our ability to suck more & more out of nature. Thus when one
area collapses, one source of food, we can move to another, until
they are all exhausted.
--
http://www.socialism.nl