A lying bar steward!

[David_B]

Aardvark said....

> "I have no reason whatsoever to lie, so why the fuck would I?"

Maybe because you are an Elite Hacker?

[David_B]

@Aardvark

You did say "while I did my 1337 h4><0Ring" - didn't you?

I don't believe you are a patch on the *real* guys! ;-)

[Dances with Socks]

stop taking a bath in the hinky sauce

note: cross-post removed
--
A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate,
because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he
can understand. -Bertrand Russell
Registered Linux User #393236

[David_B]

Dances with Socks (Aardvark's sock) wrote:
> On 09/24/2012 04:34 PM, David_B wrote:
>> David_B wrote:
>>> Aardvark said....
>>>
>>> > "I have no reason whatsoever to lie, so why the fuck would I?"
>>>
>>> Maybe because you are an Elite Hacker?
>>
>> @Aardvark
>>
>> You did say "while I did my 1337 h4><0Ring" - didn't you?
>>
>> I don't believe you are a patch on the *real* guys! ;-)
>>
>
> stop taking a bath in the hinky sauce

Aardvark's sock replied!

The truth *will* out! :-)

[Aardvark]

On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:23:44 +0100, the cowardly, slimy fugitive cunt
wrote:

> Aardvark said....
>
> > "I have no reason whatsoever to lie, so why the fuck would I?"
>
> Maybe because you are an Elite Hacker?

LOL. You fucking idiot.



--
"One of the painful things about our time is that
those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with
any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt
and indecision" -Bertrand Russell, 1872-1970

[Aardvark]

On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:34:53 +0100, David_B wrote:

> David_B wrote:
>> Aardvark said....
>>
>> > "I have no reason whatsoever to lie, so why the fuck would I?"
>>
>> Maybe because you are an Elite Hacker?
>
> @Aardvark
>
> You did say "while I did my 1337 h4><0Ring" - didn't you?
>

Of course I did, you stupid fucker. Did you somehow miss the extensive
sarcasm in the whole paragraph containing that sarcastic sentence?

> I don't believe you are a patch on the *real* guys!

Nor do I, you stupid cunt. Still, I know far, far more than you do, you
fucking moron.

[Aardvark]

On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:53:15 +0100, the cowardly, slimy fugitive cunt
wrote:

You really are fucking stupid, aren't you.

>
> The truth *will* out!

You can't even recognise the truth when it's staring you right in the
face, you wilfully blind cunt.

[Dances with Socks]

On 09/24/2012 05:00 PM, Aardvark wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:53:15 +0100, the cowardly, slimy fugitive cunt
> wrote:
>
>> Dances with Socks (Aardvark's sock) wrote:
>>> On 09/24/2012 04:34 PM, David_B wrote:
>>>> David_B wrote:
>>>>> Aardvark said....
>>>>>
>>>>> > "I have no reason whatsoever to lie, so why the fuck would I?"
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe because you are an Elite Hacker?
>>>>
>>>> @Aardvark
>>>>
>>>> You did say "while I did my 1337 h4><0Ring" - didn't you?
>>>>
>>>> I don't believe you are a patch on the *real* guys! ;-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> stop taking a bath in the hinky sauce
>>
>> Aardvark's sock replied!
>
> You really are fucking stupid, aren't you.
>
>>
>> The truth *will* out!
>
> You can't even recognise the truth when it's staring you right in the
> face, you wilfully blind cunt.
>

I would killfile it but I'm havin' too much fun

[Aardvark]

On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 17:59:23 -0400, Dances with Socks wrote:

> On 09/24/2012 05:00 PM, Aardvark wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:53:15 +0100, the cowardly, slimy fugitive cunt
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dances with Socks (Aardvark's sock) wrote:
>>>> On 09/24/2012 04:34 PM, David_B wrote:
>>>>> David_B wrote:
>>>>>> Aardvark said....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > "I have no reason whatsoever to lie, so why the fuck would I?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe because you are an Elite Hacker?
>>>>>
>>>>> @Aardvark
>>>>>
>>>>> You did say "while I did my 1337 h4><0Ring" - didn't you?
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't believe you are a patch on the *real* guys! ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> stop taking a bath in the hinky sauce
>>>
>>> Aardvark's sock replied!
>>
>> You really are fucking stupid, aren't you.
>>
>>
>>> The truth *will* out!
>>
>> You can't even recognise the truth when it's staring you right in the
>> face, you wilfully blind cunt.
>>
> I would killfile it but I'm havin' too much fun

The fucker has to be closely watched, IMHO.

[Aardvark]

On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:01:35 -0400, Dances with Socks wrote:

> you really are a cunt
>
> Note: x-poast removed

Heh. I've been removing the alt.2600 part of the cross-post. The thread
is apparently about me and I'm trying to un-frequent 2600.

It was one of his fucking stupid cross-posts that brought me to 2600 in
the first place.

Reply sent to scorched smurfs.

[Eagle]

Dances with Socks pinched this loaf and grinned with :

> On 09/24/2012 05:00 PM, Aardvark wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:53:15 +0100, the cowardly, slimy fugitive cunt
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dances with Socks (Aardvark's sock) wrote:
>>>> On 09/24/2012 04:34 PM, David_B wrote:
>>>>> David_B wrote:
>>>>>> Aardvark said....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > "I have no reason whatsoever to lie, so why the fuck would I?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe because you are an Elite Hacker?
>>>>>
>>>>> @Aardvark
>>>>>
>>>>> You did say "while I did my 1337 h4><0Ring" - didn't you?
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't believe you are a patch on the *real* guys! ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> stop taking a bath in the hinky sauce
>>>
>>> Aardvark's sock replied!
>>
>> You really are fucking stupid, aren't you.
>>
>>>
>>> The truth *will* out!
>>
>> You can't even recognise the truth when it's staring you right in the
>> face, you wilfully blind cunt.
>>
> I would killfile it but I'm havin' too much fun

<shaking head>

--
Eagle
Chance is a word void of sense; nothing can exist without a cause

[Aardvark]

On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:28:09 +0100, BD Lite wrote:

> Dances with Socks <inv...@invalid.net> wrote in news:k3ql3r$sq3$1
> @news.albasani.net:

>
>> On 09/24/2012 05:00 PM, Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:53:15 +0100, the cowardly, slimy fugitive cunt
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dances with Socks (Aardvark's sock) wrote:
>>>>> On 09/24/2012 04:34 PM, David_B wrote:
>>>>>> David_B wrote:
>>>>>>> Aardvark said....
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > "I have no reason whatsoever to lie, so why the fuck would I?"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe because you are an Elite Hacker?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @Aardvark
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You did say "while I did my 1337 h4><0Ring" - didn't you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't believe you are a patch on the *real* guys! ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> stop taking a bath in the hinky sauce
>>>>
>>>> Aardvark's sock replied!
>>>
>>> You really are fucking stupid, aren't you.
>>>
>>>
>>>> The truth *will* out!
>>>
>>> You can't even recognise the truth when it's staring you right in the
>>> face, you wilfully blind cunt.
>>>
>> I would killfile it but I'm havin' too much fun
>

> It's such a k-k-krazy world on Scorched Earth when the boys start
> arguing that oftentimes it's better to be in A2600! :)
>
>

Well, if you like 2600 so fucking much, Bear, you fucking troll, why not
fucking stay there?

[Eagle]

After serious thinking Aardvark wrote :

> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:01:35 -0400, Dances with Socks wrote:
>
>> On 09/24/2012 04:53 PM, David_B wrote:
>>> Dances with Socks (Aardvark's sock) wrote:
>>>> On 09/24/2012 04:34 PM, David_B wrote:
>>>>> David_B wrote:
>>>>>> Aardvark said....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > "I have no reason whatsoever to lie, so why the fuck would I?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe because you are an Elite Hacker?
>>>>>
>>>>> @Aardvark
>>>>>
>>>>> You did say "while I did my 1337 h4><0Ring" - didn't you?
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't believe you are a patch on the *real* guys! ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> stop taking a bath in the hinky sauce
>>>
>>> Aardvark's sock replied!
>>>
>>> The truth *will* out! :-)
>>>
>>>
>> you really are a cunt
>>
>> Note: x-poast removed
>
> Heh. I've been removing the alt.2600 part of the cross-post. The thread
> is apparently about me and I'm trying to un-frequent 2600.
>
> It was one of his fucking stupid cross-posts that brought me to 2600 in
> the first place.
>
> Reply sent to scorched smurfs.

You talking to yourself now? It's a bit boring here, but WTF?

[Jenn]

He's a broken record.... {{{yawn}}}

--
Jenn

[Aardvark]

No.

> It's a bit boring here, but WTF?

Got a point?

[Dances with Socks]

you're about as clueless as the boater

[Dances with Socks]

it's not content with fucking up acf

[Aardvark]

Possibly, although the boater's 'friends' have a tendency to take his
lies and/or wild, highly inaccurate speculations and run with them as if
they're proven facts.

[Dances with Socks]

birds of a feather and such...

[Dances with Socks]

On 09/24/2012 07:39 PM, G. Morgan wrote:

> Dances with Socks wrote:
>
>> it's not content with fucking up acf
>

> +1
>

it draws trolls like flies to shit

[FromTheRafters]

on 9/24/2012, Aardvark supposed :

Bear used to post there until Dustin kicked his ass.

[David_B]

Yet it's Dustin who has disappeared from the scene!

Maybe *Bear* won, and Dustin is too embarrassed to show his face again.

[BurfordTJustice]

"David_B" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:k3rpg5$dll$1...@dont-email.me...

> Bear used to post there until Dustin kicked his ass.

Yet it's Dustin who has disappeared from the scene!

Maybe *Bear* won, and Dustin is too embarrassed to show his face again.

--
Remember he works for others so he has to do and go where he is told.

[Eagle]

Dances with Socks presented the following explanation :

STFU Aardvark.

--
Eagle
Always forgive your enemies, but never forget their names.

[Aardvark]

I didn't write the post you replied to. I wrote the one before that which
the previous poster replied to.

FYI
HTH
HAD

[Aardvark]

On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:20:19 +0100, the cowardly, slimy fugitive cunt

He'll be back. *Soon*.

> Maybe *Bear* won,

WTF????? LOL. Everyone knows the fucking Beartroll gets its ass handed to
it on a fucking platter with monotonous regularity.

> and Dustin is too embarrassed to show his face again.

For someone who professes to not want any trouble with Dustin, you spend
a lot of fucking time trying to needle him.

As I said before - your words say no but your eyes say yes.

[Aardvark]

Well, if Dustin hadn't done it, someone else would have. The Beartroll is
such a glutton for punishment.

[Aardvark]

Indeed.

[Aardvark]

It obviously thrives on conflict and attention. All attention is good
attention to such a creature.

[BurfordTJustice]

"Aardvark" <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in message
news:k3sjs7$7v5$3...@dont-email.me...

As I said before - your words say no but your eyes say yes.



--

You ain't man enough to look david brooks of devon
or any other man in the eyes.
You are a pathetic little runt with a big drunk/drugged mouth
that is all, pipsqueak.

[Eagle]

Aardvark presented the following explanation :

I know who I posted to. You and the sock master have much in common.

--
Eagle
Someone who thinks logically, provides a nice contrast to the real
world.

[Aardvark]

I'm going to tell you this once, and only once- if I make a post, you can
tell it's me because the associated nym will *always* be 'Aardvark'. Keep
insulting me by accusing me of socking up, I can easily go back to
addressing you by the highly descriptive moniker 'monkey-boi'.

Your choice.

[Eagle]

"Aardvark" <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in message

news:k3ss50$8df$3...@dont-email.me...

I'm going to tell you this once, and only once- if I make a post, you can
tell it's me because the associated nym will *always* be 'Aardvark'. Keep
insulting me by accusing me of socking up, I can easily go back to
addressing you by the highly descriptive moniker 'monkey-boi'.

Your choice.



--

Wooo Tough mouth for a fucking drunk/drugged runt.

[Dances with Socks]

I have provided many clues as to who I am
see below

[Aardvark]

Unlike some, I have no interest whatsoever in who you are, nor will I
even speculate.

I do know that you can't be me because *my* registered Linux user number
begins with a '4'. You registered long before I did.

[David_B]

Max Wachtel could run rings around you, Aardvark.

He's done much to help others on-line, unlike you.

You can read about him here: http://my.opera.com/maxpro4u/about/

[Max Wachtel]

I should update that page

[David_B]

:-) No need! It simply proves that you are the genuine article and are
not trying to hide. I respect that.

How are your grandsons progressing, Max?

Time flies by so quickly. Mine are now 16, 12 and 10 - it seems as if
only yesterday they were just a twinkle in my son's eyes!

[Aardvark]

On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:58:02 +0100, the cowardly, slimy fugitive cunt
wrote:

> <SNIP IRRELEVANCE>

You want to discuss something other than the fucking topic, start a new
fucking thread.

[Aardvark]

If you don't, the boater will get a 'hinky' about you.

:-)

[Max Wachtel]

the boys are doing fine. the oldest is in 7th grade now and the younger
is in 3rd(just turned 9).

[Jenn]

My grandson just turned 1yr! :D

--
Jenn

[David_B]

I'm pleased to hear that all is well!:-)

Changing the subject now, what advice could you give to the poster here?

Message-ID: <wqKdnUvxD4annf_N...@bt.com>

Can you help him yourself?

Might you suggest he try www.Aumha.net or, perhaps, an alternate help
group? Maybe Annexcafe User2User? Somewhere else?

[Dances with Socks]

I suggest he try to clean with AntiVir's boot disk or David Lipman's
multi-av

[Aardvark]

I definitely would have suggested Multi-AV. Don't think I've ever looked
at AntiVir, but now I think I will.

:-)

Someone I know had this infection a few weeks ago. I told her to use MBAM
and it worked. It hasn't returned (should I say 'yet?).

[David_B]

Sounds good to me. Will you tell him yourself or would you like me to
pass on your suggestion?

Btw, I was serious about referring folk to a 'help' site. No thoughts?

[Dances with Socks]

AntiVir boot disk is linux based. I have used it a few times.

[Aardvark]

Heh. I knew that. Is it text-only (command line) or does it run from a
desktop like the Mini Linux in Hiren's?

> I have used it a few times.

It's my next self-educational project. :-)

[Eagle]

Aardvark has brought this to us :

My choice?
Here it is...
FUCK YOU MEATHEAD.
You don't tell me what to do or what to say, got it? You want to be a
punk, I'll help you along. You want to chat on subjects and do it
without being a fuckwit, I like that.
YOUR choice.

[Eagle]

Eagle presented the following explanation :

> "Aardvark" <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in message
> news:k3ss50$8df$3...@dont-email.me...
> I'm going to tell you this once, and only once- if I make a post, you can
> tell it's me because the associated nym will *always* be 'Aardvark'. Keep
> insulting me by accusing me of socking up, I can easily go back to
> addressing you by the highly descriptive moniker 'monkey-boi'.
>
> Your choice.

STFU moose. Back in the dungeon with your mangy ass. Aardvark and I can
handle our own issues without your hog wallowing ass.

--
Eagle
I stayed up all night to see where the sun went. Then it dawned on me.

[Aardvark]

> <SNIP TYPICAL MONKEY-BOI INSULTS>


Whatever, monkey-boi.

[Eagle]

Aardvark formulated this mess of confusion :

>> <SNIP EAGLE INSULTS>
>
>
> Whatever,<SNIP TYPICAL MEATHEAD COMEBACK>

That the best you can do meathead?
Fuck you and the hog you rode in on.

--
Eagle
Always forgive your enemies, but never forget their names.

[Max Wachtel]

It has a gui

>> I have used it a few times.
>
> It's my next self-educational project. :-)

It is updated all the time

[Bear]

Dances with Socks <inv...@invalid.net> wrote in

news:k3qqmj$7m3$3...@news.albasani.net:

> On 09/24/2012 06:38 PM, Aardvark wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:28:09 +0100, BD Lite wrote:
>>
>>> Dances with Socks <inv...@invalid.net> wrote in news:k3ql3r$sq3$1
>>> @news.albasani.net:
>>>

>>>> On 09/24/2012 05:00 PM, Aardvark wrote:

>>>>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:53:15 +0100, the cowardly, slimy fugitive
>>>>> cunt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dances with Socks (Aardvark's sock) wrote:
>>>>>>> On 09/24/2012 04:34 PM, David_B wrote:
>>>>>>>> David_B wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Aardvark said....
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> > "I have no reason whatsoever to lie, so why the fuck would
>>>>>>>>> > I?"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maybe because you are an Elite Hacker?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @Aardvark
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You did say "while I did my 1337 h4><0Ring" - didn't you?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't believe you are a patch on the *real* guys! ;-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> stop taking a bath in the hinky sauce
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Aardvark's sock replied!
>>>>>

>>>>> You really are fucking stupid, aren't you.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> The truth *will* out!
>>>>>
>>>>> You can't even recognise the truth when it's staring you right in
>>>>> the face, you wilfully blind cunt.
>>>>>
>>>> I would killfile it but I'm havin' too much fun
>>>
>>> It's such a k-k-krazy world on Scorched Earth when the boys start
>>> arguing that oftentimes it's better to be in A2600! :)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Well, if you like 2600 so fucking much, Bear, you fucking troll, why
>> not fucking stay there?
>>
>>
> it's not content with fucking up acf

DWS don't confuse me with Billy. Even when we swap PCs I sign my posts
with my name.

Anyways I haven't been posting in a.c.f. much these days. :)

Jax
--
Bear Bottoms
http://bearware.info

[Bear]

Aardvark <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
news:k3sjs7$7v5$3...@dont-email.me:

> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:20:19 +0100, the cowardly, slimy fugitive cunt
> wrote:
>
>> FromTheRafters wrote:
>>> on 9/24/2012, Aardvark supposed :

>>> Bear used to post there until Dustin kicked his ass.
>>
>> Yet it's Dustin who has disappeared from the scene!
>>
>
> He'll be back. *Soon*.
>
>> Maybe *Bear* won,
>
> WTF????? LOL. Everyone knows the fucking Beartroll gets its ass handed
> to it on a fucking platter with monotonous regularity.
>
>> and Dustin is too embarrassed to show his face again.
>
> For someone who professes to not want any trouble with Dustin, you spend
> a lot of fucking time trying to needle him.

>
> As I said before - your words say no but your eyes say yes.

Maybe Dustin is licking his wounds. He got a mauling a few months back
over how little he knew about DNS compared to Billy.

Now Dustin picks on me as if it was me who put him right. "Got kids"...ha!

[Max Wachtel]

you have me confused with someone who gives a fuck what you think

[Aardvark]

LOL. What fucking wounds, Bear?

> He got a mauling a few months back
> over how little he knew about DNS compared to Billy.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!!!!!! Are you *still* telling that fucking lie
and thinking you'll get away with it, Bear, yoiu fucking lying cunt?

>
> Now Dustin picks on me as if it was me who put him right.

LOL. *He* put *you* right, Bear, you stupid know-nothing fucker.

[Jenn]

Eagle wrote:
> Aardvark formulated this mess of confusion :
>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 13:18:05 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>>
>>> Aardvark has brought this to us :
>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:39:16 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Aardvark presented the following explanation :

>>>> I'm going to tell you this once, and only once- if I make a post,
>>>> you can tell it's me because the associated nym will *always* be
>>>> 'Aardvark'. Keep insulting me by accusing me of socking up, I can
>>>> easily go back to addressing you by the highly descriptive moniker
>>>> 'monkey-boi'.
>>>>
>>>> Your choice.
>>>
>>> My choice?
>>>
>>> <SNIP EAGLE INSULTS>
>>
>>
>> Whatever,<SNIP TYPICAL MEATHEAD COMEBACK>
>
> That the best you can do meathead?
> Fuck you and the hog you rode in on.

That's all he can do ... intelligent conversation just isn't his thing.

--
Jenn

[Bear]

Max Wachtel <maxp...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:k3t68t$irr$1...@news.albasani.net:

Begging your pardon Max! :)

[Max Wachtel]

where ever you go, you seem to attract socks and trolls

[Eagle]

Jenn submitted this idea :

Too bad. We were getting on fairly well too.

[Jenn]

He always seems like he is talking down to anyone he posts to ..

--
Jenn

[Eagle]

Jenn pretended :

I'm pissed that the silent truce we had is gone.

--
Eagle
Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.

[Jenn]

sorry :-( I understand ... he isn't exactly on my list of people I
think are reliable or even care about others but himself.

--
Jenn

[Bear]

Eagle <deag...@gmail.com> wrote in news:mn.cb977dc97d57258f.128701
@gmail.com:

Aardvark couldn't stop goading you with insulting terms.

I wonder if there is something deeply wrong with him. He's so arrogant and
also so bitter.

Could he have a superiority complex and be getting frustrated because no one
will acknowledge his proclaimed superiority?

[Aardvark]

On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:19:09 -0700, Eagle wrote:

> I'm pissed that the silent truce we had is gone.

I'm neither surprised nor bothered by it, monkey-boi.

[Aardvark]

Really, Bear? I've never goaded monkey-boi. Not once. I have, however,
responded to his insulting demeanour and shitty attitude many, many times.

> I wonder if there is something deeply wrong with him. He's so arrogant
> and also so bitter.

LOL. Nothing wrong with me, Bear, you psycho-babbling cunt. Nor am I
either arrogant or bitter. I have no fucking reason to be either.

>
> Could he have a superiority complex and be getting frustrated because no
> one will acknowledge his proclaimed superiority?
>

*PSYCHO-BABBLE FAIL*

LOL. You're a fucking idiot, Bear, you stupid cunt.

[Eagle]

Aardvark laid this down on his screen :

> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:19:09 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>
>> I'm pissed that the silent truce we had is gone.
>

> I'm neither surprised nor bothered by it, Eagle.

Of this I'm sure of.

[FromTheRafters]

Max Wachtel has brought this to us :

> On 09/25/2012 02:58 PM, David_B wrote:
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:28:54 -0400, Dances with Socks wrote:
>>>

>>>> On 09/25/2012 01:39 PM, Eagle wrote:
>>>>> Aardvark presented the following explanation :

>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:28:42 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dances with Socks presented the following explanation :
>>>>>>>> On 09/24/2012 07:46 PM, Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 19:30:48 -0400, Dances with Socks wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 09/24/2012 06:38 PM, Eagle wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> After serious thinking Aardvark wrote :
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:01:35 -0400, Dances with Socks wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/24/2012 04:53 PM, David_B wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dances with Socks (Aardvark's sock) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/24/2012 04:34 PM, David_B wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> David_B wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aardvark said....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > "I have no reason whatsoever to lie, so why the fuck
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > would I?"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe because you are an Elite Hacker?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Aardvark
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You did say "while I did my 1337 h4><0Ring" - didn't you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe you are a patch on the *real* guys! ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stop taking a bath in the hinky sauce
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aardvark's sock replied!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Be sure to include some bad links or links that go to some other old
out of date pages. Oh - and it wouldn't hurt to throw in some
analytics.live.com code for good measure (and a shout-out to AUHMA).

[Dances with Socks]

that made me laugh out loud

[David_B]

Dances with Socks wrote:
> On 09/25/2012 09:19 PM, FromTheRafters wrote:

[....]

>> Be sure to include some bad links or links that go to some other old out
>> of date pages. Oh - and it wouldn't hurt to throw in some
>> analytics.live.com code for good measure (and a shout-out to AUHMA).
>>
>>
> that made me laugh out loud

Me too! At least it demonstrates that you both recall some 'history'!

You could, perhaps, update these, Max:

Virus Removal: http://maxpro4u.freehostingnow.com/removal.html
Keep Clean: http://maxpro4u.freehostingnow.com/keepingclean.html
Tools: http://maxpro4u.freehostingnow.com/tools.html

One question. Have you ever, would you ever, direct folk to approach the
experts at www.aumha.net for help/advice about computer problems?

[BurfordTJustice]

"Max Wachtel" <maxp...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:k3t9fo$q1h$1...@news.albasani.net...

>
where ever you go, you seem to attract socks and trolls
--

Who was it that ran and did david brooks of devon's bidding over
at Annexcafe?

[Dances with Socks]

On 09/26/2012 03:51 AM, David_B wrote:
> Dances with Socks wrote:
>> On 09/25/2012 09:19 PM, FromTheRafters wrote:
> [....]
>>> Be sure to include some bad links or links that go to some other old out
>>> of date pages. Oh - and it wouldn't hurt to throw in some
>>> analytics.live.com code for good measure (and a shout-out to AUHMA).
>>>
>>>
>> that made me laugh out loud
>
> Me too! At least it demonstrates that you both recall some 'history'!
>
> You could, perhaps, update these, Max:
>
> Virus Removal: http://maxpro4u.freehostingnow.com/removal.html
> Keep Clean: http://maxpro4u.freehostingnow.com/keepingclean.html
> Tools: http://maxpro4u.freehostingnow.com/tools.html

seems as those pages are history...

> One question. Have you ever, would you ever, direct folk to approach the
> experts at www.aumha.net for help/advice about computer problems?
>

why yes, yes I have

[Eagle]

Aardvark expressed precisely :
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:58:02 +0100, the cowardly, slimy fugitive cunt

>> <SNIP IRRELEVANCE>
>
> You want to discuss something other than the fucking topic, start a new
> fucking thread.

You think you could do this without your usual dunny language?

[David_B]

BurfordTJustice wrote:
>
> "Max Wachtel" <maxp...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:k3t9fo$q1h$1...@news.albasani.net...
>>
> where ever you go, you seem to attract socks and trolls

I wonder if Max has recognised that you keep track of *everything* which
transpires here.

Some think you are simply a Troll - but you are *much* more than that,
aren't you?!!! ;-)

[David_B]

Dances with Socks wrote:
> On 09/26/2012 03:51 AM, David_B wrote:
>> Dances with Socks wrote:
>>> On 09/25/2012 09:19 PM, FromTheRafters wrote:
>> [....]
>>>> Be sure to include some bad links or links that go to some other old
>>>> out
>>>> of date pages. Oh - and it wouldn't hurt to throw in some
>>>> analytics.live.com code for good measure (and a shout-out to AUHMA).
>>>>
>>>>
>>> that made me laugh out loud
>>
>> Me too! At least it demonstrates that you both recall some 'history'!
>>
>> You could, perhaps, update these, Max:
>>
>> Virus Removal: http://maxpro4u.freehostingnow.com/removal.html
>> Keep Clean: http://maxpro4u.freehostingnow.com/keepingclean.html
>> Tools: http://maxpro4u.freehostingnow.com/tools.html
>
> seems as those pages are history...

We've known one another for quite a while, eh?!! [g]

>> One question. Have you ever, would you ever, direct folk to approach the
>> experts at www.aumha.net for help/advice about computer problems?
>>
>
> why yes, yes I have

Thanks. I'll ponder on that! :-)

[Bear]

Aardvark <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in news:k3tg33$s7n$9...@dont-email.me:

>> Aardvark couldn't stop goading you with insulting terms.
>
> Really, Bear? I've never goaded monkey-boi. Not once. I have, however,
> responded to his insulting demeanour and shitty attitude many, many times.
>
>
>> I wonder if there is something deeply wrong with him. He's so arrogant
>> and also so bitter.
>
> LOL. Nothing wrong with me, Bear, you psycho-babbling cunt. Nor am I
> either arrogant or bitter. I have no fucking reason to be either.
>
>
>> Could he have a superiority complex and be getting frustrated because no
>> one will acknowledge his proclaimed superiority?
>

> LOL. You're a fucking idiot, Bear, you stupid cunt.

Your reply proves my point.

[Dances with Socks]

everybody needs a hobby

[Aardvark]

Your point is that you're a fucking idiot? WTF?????

You shouldn't be so hard on yourself- leave that up to others, Bear, you
fucking idiot.

[Aardvark]

On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 04:53:27 -0700, Eagle wrote:

> Aardvark wrote:

>> You want to discuss something other than the fucking topic, start a new
>> fucking thread.
>
> You think you could do this without your usual dunny language?

Correction- *English* language.

FYI
HTH
HAD

[Aardvark]

On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 08:51:14 +0100, the cowardly, slimy fugitive cunt
wrote:

> Dances with Socks wrote:
>> On 09/25/2012 09:19 PM, FromTheRafters wrote:
> [....]
>>> Be sure to include some bad links or links that go to some other old
>>> out of date pages. Oh - and it wouldn't hurt to throw in some
>>> analytics.live.com code for good measure (and a shout-out to AUHMA).
>>>
>>>
>> that made me laugh out loud
>
> Me too! At least it demonstrates that you both recall some 'history'!
>

Hard to forget, considering the number of times you brought up the same
stupid fucking questions about those subjects over a period of a few
months.

> You could, perhaps, update these, Max:
>

> <SNIP>

You weren't responding to Max.

[BurfordTJustice]

"David_B" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:k3usmp$nq6$1...@dont-email.me...

--
You and max avoided the question:

[Eagle]

Aardvark explained on 9/26/2012 :

> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 04:53:27 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>
>> Aardvark wrote:
>
>>> You want to discuss something other than the fucking topic, start a new
>>> fucking thread.
>>
>> You think you could do this without your usual dunny language?
>

> <snip incorrect correction>

Correction: Aardvark English. Which includes several uses of "fuck",
"cunt", and assorted unacceptable foul words.

[Max Wachtel]

On 09/26/2012 12:54 PM, BurfordTJustice wrote:

> Who was it that ran and did david brooks of devon's bidding over
> at Annexcafe?
>

is there a point?

[Aardvark]

On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:31:40 -0700, Eagle wrote:

> Aardvark explained on 9/26/2012 :
>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 04:53:27 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>>
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>
>>>> You want to discuss something other than the fucking topic, start a
>>>> new fucking thread.
>>>
>>> You think you could do this without your usual dunny language?
>>
>> <snip incorrect correction>
>
> Correction: Aardvark English. Which includes several uses of "fuck",
> "cunt",

LOL. That's just fucking English.

> and assorted unacceptable foul words.

There's no such fucking thing as a 'foul' word. Words are just that-
words.

[Bear]

Aardvark <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in news:k3vf9c$dtq$1...@dont-email.me:

> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:31:40 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>
>> Aardvark explained on 9/26/2012 :
>>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 04:53:27 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>>>
>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>
>>>>> You want to discuss something other than the fucking topic, start a
>>>>> new fucking thread.
>>>>
>>>> You think you could do this without your usual dunny language?
>>>
>>> <snip incorrect correction>
>>
>> Correction: Aardvark English. Which includes several uses of "fuck",
>> "cunt",
>
> LOL. That's just fucking English.
>
>> and assorted unacceptable foul words.
>
> There's no such fucking thing as a 'foul' word. Words are just that-
> words.

Google not working there?

"Can you get a criminal record for foul language (England)?"
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090224054952AAYih5n

"Is verbal abuse a criminal offence in the UK?"
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081130115724AAp4jfL

[Bear]

Aardvark <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
news:k3v9bf$dtq$2...@dont-email.me:

> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:58:05 +0100, BD Lite wrote:
>
>> Aardvark <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
>> news:k3tg33$s7n$9...@dont-email.me:
>>
>>>> Aardvark couldn't stop goading you with insulting terms.
>>>
>>> Really, Bear? I've never goaded monkey-boi. Not once. I have, however,
>>> responded to his insulting demeanour and shitty attitude many, many
>>> times.
>>>
>>>
>>>> I wonder if there is something deeply wrong with him. He's so
>>>> arrogant and also so bitter.
>>>
>>> LOL. Nothing wrong with me, Bear, you psycho-babbling cunt. Nor am I
>>> either arrogant or bitter. I have no fucking reason to be either.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Could he have a superiority complex and be getting frustrated because
>>>> no one will acknowledge his proclaimed superiority?
>>>
>>> LOL. You're a fucking idiot, Bear, you stupid cunt.
>>
>> Your reply proves my point.
>>
>>
>
> Your point is that you're a fucking idiot? WTF?????
>
> You shouldn't be so hard on yourself- leave that up to others, Bear, you
> fucking idiot.

Aardvark think of your blood pressure! Relax. :)

[BurfordTJustice]

"Max Wachtel" <maxp...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:k3ve7q$q41$1...@news.albasani.net...

On 09/26/2012 12:54 PM, BurfordTJustice wrote:

> Who was it that ran and did david brooks of devon's bidding over
> at Annexcafe?
>

is there a point?
--

Why yes there is.

[Max Wachtel]

and what pray-tell might that be

su delimitador se rompe

[BurfordTJustice]

"Max Wachtel" <maxp...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:k3vmgh$elm$1...@news.albasani.net...

On 09/26/2012 03:27 PM, BurfordTJustice wrote:
> "Max Wachtel"<maxp...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:k3ve7q$q41$1...@news.albasani.net...
> On 09/26/2012 12:54 PM, BurfordTJustice wrote:
>
>> >Who was it that ran and did david brooks of devon's bidding over
>> >at Annexcafe?
>> >
> is there a point?
> -- Why yes there is.

and what pray-tell might that be

--
Are you secretly still joined at the hip to
david brooks of Devon?
Are you still running errands and creating havoc on his behalf?

[Eagle]

Bear has brought this to us :

> Aardvark <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in news:k3vf9c$dtq$1...@dont-email.me:
>
>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:31:40 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>>
>>> Aardvark explained on 9/26/2012 :
>>>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 04:53:27 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> You want to discuss something other than the fucking topic, start a
>>>>>> new fucking thread.
>>>>>
>>>>> You think you could do this without your usual dunny language?
>>>>
>>>> <snip incorrect correction>
>>>
>>> Correction: Aardvark English. Which includes several uses of "fuck",
>>> "cunt",
>>
>> LOL. That's just fucking English.
>>
>>> and assorted unacceptable foul words.
>>
>> There's no such fucking thing as a 'foul' word. Words are just that-
>> words.
>
> Google not working there?
>
> "Can you get a criminal record for foul language (England)?"
> http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090224054952AAYih5n

"Yes it is an offence. It is Section 5 of the Public Order Act. The
full offence wording is longer but he has basically used words intended
to cause alarm, harassment or distress."

>
> "Is verbal abuse a criminal offence in the UK?"
> http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081130115724AAp4jfL
>
> Jax

"Any police officer worth their salt would talk to you first before
deicding to follow up any allegation made against you."

Interesting.


--
Eagle
Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.

[Bear]

Eagle <deag...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:mn.d3277dc9cd...@gmail.com:

Poor Steve thinks it's alright to bombard people with profanities because
(in his warped logic) any word that is English is perfectly alright to use
in any circumstance to anybody for anything.

[Secret Squirrel]

On 09/26/2012 03:57 PM, BurfordTJustice wrote:
> "Max Wachtel"<maxp...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:k3vmgh$elm$1...@news.albasani.net...
> On 09/26/2012 03:27 PM, BurfordTJustice wrote:
>> >"Max Wachtel"<maxp...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> >news:k3ve7q$q41$1...@news.albasani.net...
>> >On 09/26/2012 12:54 PM, BurfordTJustice wrote:
>> >
>>>> >> >Who was it that ran and did david brooks of devon's bidding over
>>>> >> >at Annexcafe?
>>>> >> >
>> >is there a point?
>> >-- Why yes there is.
> and what pray-tell might that be
>
> -- Are you secretly still joined at the hip to david brooks of Devon?
> Are you still running errands and creating havoc on his behalf?

if i tells you then i would have to kills you

[Aardvark]

On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:27:11 -0700, Eagle wrote:

> Bear has brought this to us :
>> Aardvark <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
>> news:k3vf9c$dtq$1...@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:31:40 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>>>
>>>> Aardvark explained on 9/26/2012 :
>>>>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 04:53:27 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> You want to discuss something other than the fucking topic, start
>>>>>>> a new fucking thread.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You think you could do this without your usual dunny language?
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip incorrect correction>
>>>>
>>>> Correction: Aardvark English. Which includes several uses of "fuck",
>>>> "cunt",
>>>
>>> LOL. That's just fucking English.
>>>
>>>> and assorted unacceptable foul words.
>>>
>>> There's no such fucking thing as a 'foul' word. Words are just that-
>>> words.
>>
>> Google not working there?
>>
>> "Can you get a criminal record for foul language (England)?"
>> http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090224054952AAYih5n
>
>
> "Yes it is an offence. It is Section 5 of the Public Order Act. The full
> offence wording is longer but he has basically used words intended to
> cause alarm, harassment or distress."
>
>

You do realise that you and the Beartroll are a pair of fucking idiots,
don't you?

>> "Is verbal abuse a criminal offence in the UK?"
>> http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081130115724AAp4jfL
>>
>> Jax
>
> "Any police officer worth their salt would talk to you first before
> deicding to follow up any allegation made against you."
>
> Interesting.

Indeed. *That's* why the officer investigating the threat on my kids'
lives needs to speak to the boater cunt, as she apparently told him by
email.



--
"Compassion is not weakness, and concern for the unfortunate is not
socialism." Hubert H. Humphrey

[FromTheRafters]

Eagle was thinking very hard :

> Bear has brought this to us :
>> Aardvark <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
>> news:k3vf9c$dtq$1...@dont-email.me:
>>
>>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:31:40 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>>>
>>>> Aardvark explained on 9/26/2012 :
>>>>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 04:53:27 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> You want to discuss something other than the fucking topic, start a
>>>>>>> new fucking thread.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You think you could do this without your usual dunny language?
>>>>>
>>>>> <snip incorrect correction>
>>>>
>>>> Correction: Aardvark English. Which includes several uses of "fuck",
>>>> "cunt",
>>>
>>> LOL. That's just fucking English.
>>>
>>>> and assorted unacceptable foul words.
>>>
>>> There's no such fucking thing as a 'foul' word. Words are just that-
>>> words.
>>
>> Google not working there?
>>
>> "Can you get a criminal record for foul language (England)?"
>> http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090224054952AAYih5n
>
>
> "Yes it is an offence. It is Section 5 of the Public Order Act. The full
> offence wording is longer but he has basically used words intended to cause
> alarm, harassment or distress."

It's not exactly on point for what happens here though. This is an
international kind of forum and not all will agree on what is/isn't
foul language.

>
>>
>> "Is verbal abuse a criminal offence in the UK?"
>> http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081130115724AAp4jfL
>>
>> Jax
>
> "Any police officer worth their salt would talk to you first before deicding
> to follow up any allegation made against you."
>
> Interesting.

Of course, the officer is practically by definition *reasonable* and
can make such judgements. Still not on point for *here*.

[Eagle]

Aardvark pretended :

Make up your fickled mind! First I'm an idiot, now you agree with me.
Earth calling Aardvark!

[Aardvark]

You still are.

> now you agree with me.

No, I was, and still am, agreeing with the sentence you quoted from the
page that link leads to. There's a vast difference between the two.

[Bear]

FromTheRafters <err...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
news:k3vsd0$l6a$1...@dont-email.me:

Might be on point for RL in England if the Boater speaks to the police and
chooses to complain about Aardvark.