Re: Uhmurikin Gulag Stories

[HMS Beady]

"���hw��f" <snuhwo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:kn3gos$n95$2...@news.datemas.de...
Stories from that place Barry said he'd close.
YEAH RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Enduring ailments ranging from dizziness to kidney failure to "aching
heart," up to 130 detainees at Guantanamo enter their
100th day of a hunger strike Friday, with at least 30 being force-fed,
five in critical condition, many facing irreversible
health risks and several charging that they are threatened with body
searches if they seek to contact lawyers. Thus has
CNN responded to the travesty by running a heartfelt piece on the harsh
conditions facing guards.
�Let them kill us as we have nothing to lose. We died when Obama
indefinitely detained us.� - one longtime detainee

=================
The sorry bastards should eat then they would feel better.
Even a retard like you should see that.

Have you given up your guns and fossil fuel powered vehicles?

[Eagle]

On Fri, 17 May 2013 05:10:34 -0400, "HMS Beady" <hmsbeady@
hotmail...UK> wrote:

>
>"§ñühwö£f" <snuhwo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

>news:kn3gos$n95$2...@news.datemas.de...
>Stories from that place Barry said he'd close.
>YEAH RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>Enduring ailments ranging from dizziness to kidney failure to "aching
>heart," up to 130 detainees at Guantanamo enter their
>100th day of a hunger strike Friday, with at least 30 being force-fed,
>five in critical condition, many facing irreversible
>health risks and several charging that they are threatened with body
>searches if they seek to contact lawyers. Thus has
>CNN responded to the travesty by running a heartfelt piece on the harsh
>conditions facing guards.

>“Let them kill us as we have nothing to lose. We died when Obama
>indefinitely detained us.” - one longtime detainee

Good idea. Kill the fuckers. Save the money spent on feeding the
bastids.
I suggest feeding them to the local Kaman. That way there won't be any
need to burry the bodies.

--

Eagle

It does not require many words to speak the truth.
Chief Joseph

[Aardvark]

On Fri, 17 May 2013 18:32:51 -0700, Eagle wrote:

> On Fri, 17 May 2013 05:10:34 -0400, "HMS Beady" <hmsbeady@ hotmail...UK>
> wrote:
>
>
>>"§ñühwö£f" <snuhwo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:kn3gos$n95$2...@news.datemas.de...
>>Stories from that place Barry said he'd close.
>>YEAH RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>>Enduring ailments ranging from dizziness to kidney failure to "aching
>>heart," up to 130 detainees at Guantanamo enter their 100th day of a
>>hunger strike Friday, with at least 30 being force-fed, five in critical
>>condition, many facing irreversible health risks and several charging
>>that they are threatened with body searches if they seek to contact
>>lawyers. Thus has CNN responded to the travesty by running a heartfelt
>>piece on the harsh conditions facing guards.
>>“Let them kill us as we have nothing to lose. We died when Obama
>>indefinitely detained us.” - one longtime detainee
>
> Good idea. Kill the fuckers.

Your advocacy of murder noted.

> Save the money spent on feeding the
> bastids.

Why do you advocate cruel and inhumane treatment of men who have been
detained for years without charge or trial?

> I suggest feeding them to the local Kaman.

Do you mean cayman or K-man?

> That way there won't be any
> need to burry the bodies.

What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?



--
"I am not made like anyone I have seen; I dare believe I am not made
like anyone in existence. If I am not better, at least I am different."
-Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778)

[~BD~]

Syrian rebel defends eating dead soldier's organs as revenge
************************************************************

A Syrian rebel militia leader filmed cutting the heart and organs out of
a regime soldier's corpse and putting it in his mouth has defended his
actions as legitimate vengeance.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10057420/Syrian-rebel-defends-eating-dead-soldiers-organs-as-revenge.html
--

[Eagle]

Aardvark expects you to read this :

> On Fri, 17 May 2013 18:32:51 -0700, Eagle wrote:

>> On Fri, 17 May 2013 05:10:34 -0400, "HMS Beady" <hmsbeady@ hotmail...UK>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> "§ñühwö£f" <snuhwo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:kn3gos$n95$2...@news.datemas.de...
>>> Stories from that place Barry said he'd close.
>>> YEAH RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>
>>> Enduring ailments ranging from dizziness to kidney failure to "aching
>>> heart," up to 130 detainees at Guantanamo enter their 100th day of a
>>> hunger strike Friday, with at least 30 being force-fed, five in critical
>>> condition, many facing irreversible health risks and several charging
>>> that they are threatened with body searches if they seek to contact
>>> lawyers. Thus has CNN responded to the travesty by running a heartfelt
>>> piece on the harsh conditions facing guards.
>>> “Let them kill us as we have nothing to lose. We died when Obama
>>> indefinitely detained us.” - one longtime detainee
>>
>> Good idea. Kill the fuckers.

> Your advocacy of murder noted.

Your OPINION noted.

>> Save the money spent on feeding the
>> bastids.

> Why do you advocate cruel and inhumane treatment of men who have been
> detained for years without charge or trial?

We are at WAR against world wide terrorism.

>> I suggest feeding them to the local Kaman.

> Do you mean cayman or K-man?

Cayman.

>> That way there won't be any
>> need to burry the bodies.

> What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?

Why are you trying to support people who would kill you as soon as look
at you?

--
Eagle
Why were the Indians here first? They had reservations.

[Eagle]

It happens that ~BD~ formulated :

Careful Dave, you might be accused of guilt before innocence.

[~BD~]

As you are aware, your pal Aardvark has somewhat distorted views with
regard to 'Human Rights' - IMO anyway.

Personally, I support the way Lawrence of Arabia dealt with the Arabs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aARaYjgm_rA "No prisoners"!

Had 'we' taken no prisoners, there would have been no need for the
Guantanamo Bay detention camp!

--

[Aardvark]

> <SNIP IRRELEVANCE>

WTF?????

[Aardvark]

On Sat, 18 May 2013 14:50:23 -0700, Eagle wrote:

> Aardvark expects you to read this :
>> On Fri, 17 May 2013 18:32:51 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>
>>> On Fri, 17 May 2013 05:10:34 -0400, "HMS Beady" <hmsbeady@
>>> hotmail...UK>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> "§ñühwö£f" <snuhwo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:kn3gos$n95$2...@news.datemas.de...
>>>> Stories from that place Barry said he'd close.
>>>> YEAH RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>>>
>>>> Enduring ailments ranging from dizziness to kidney failure to "aching
>>>> heart," up to 130 detainees at Guantanamo enter their 100th day of a
>>>> hunger strike Friday, with at least 30 being force-fed, five in
>>>> critical condition, many facing irreversible health risks and several
>>>> charging that they are threatened with body searches if they seek to
>>>> contact lawyers. Thus has CNN responded to the travesty by running a
>>>> heartfelt piece on the harsh conditions facing guards.
>>>> “Let them kill us as we have nothing to lose. We died when Obama
>>>> indefinitely detained us.” - one longtime detainee
>>>
>>> Good idea. Kill the fuckers.
>
>> Your advocacy of murder noted.
>
> Your OPINION noted.
>

It's not an opinion. You clearly wrote 'kill the fuckers'. Those
'fuckers' have been detained, some for years, without charge or trial.
Killing them would be nothing but murder.

>>> Save the money spent on feeding the bastids.
>
>> Why do you advocate cruel and inhumane treatment of men who have been
>> detained for years without charge or trial?
>
> We are at WAR against world wide terrorism.
>
>

That's irrelevant. I repeat my question:

Why do you advocate cruel and inhumane treatment of men who have been
detained for years without charge or trial?

Any chance of a response?

>>> I suggest feeding them to the local Kaman.
>
>> Do you mean cayman or K-man?
>
> Cayman.
>
>>> That way there won't be any need to burry the bodies.
>
>> What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
>
> Why are you trying to support people who would kill you as soon as look
> at you?

I'm supporting *no one*. what I *am* supporting is the rule of law, where
there's a procedure for dealing with people suspected of committing
crimes. These people have never been availed of this legal procedure.

Again, I ask:

What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?

Any chance of a response?

[Aardvark]

No, cunt. Nothing distorted about my views. I clearly know much more
about them than you fucking do.

> - IMO anyway.
>

Which has more weight, cunt? Your opinion or a pile of sheep-shit?

> Personally, I support the way Lawrence of Arabia dealt with the Arabs.
>

> <SNIP LINK UNCLICKED> "No prisoners"!

Because you're just as fucking bloodthirsty as your crazy, malicious,
bigot woman 'friend', cunt.

>
> Had 'we' taken no prisoners, there would have been no need for the
> Guantanamo Bay detention camp!

Or even not started a war of aggression, cunt. What about the people who
were sold to the US authorities? Those who had taken no part in any war,
but were detained in Guantanamo? You believe in killing innocents too?
Fuck, you really are a sick fuck, aren't you?

[Eagle]

Aardvark dropped this bomb :

Yes, it was indeed an opinion. I said kill the fuckers, not murder
them.

>>>> Save the money spent on feeding the bastids.
>>> Why do you advocate cruel and inhumane treatment of men who have been
>>> detained for years without charge or trial?
>>
>> We are at WAR against world wide terrorism.
>>
>>

> That's irrelevant. I repeat my question:

<cut repeated text>

> Any chance of a response?

We are at WAR against world wide terrorism. The rules change under
articles of war V peace.

>>>> I suggest feeding them to the local Kaman.
>>> Do you mean cayman or K-man?
>>
>> Cayman.
>>
>>>> That way there won't be any need to burry the bodies.
>>> What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
>>
>> Why are you trying to support people who would kill you as soon as look
>> at you?

> I'm supporting *no one*. what I *am* supporting is the rule of law, where
> there's a procedure for dealing with people suspected of committing
> crimes. These people have never been availed of this legal procedure.

> Again, I ask:

> <cut repeated text>

> Any chance of a response?

See above.

[Eagle]

~BD~ wrote this mess :

We all have the right to our point of view, Dave, Aardvarks is not
shared by many.

> Personally, I support the way Lawrence of Arabia dealt with the Arabs.

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aARaYjgm_rA "No prisoners"!

> Had 'we' taken no prisoners, there would have been no need for the Guantanamo
> Bay detention camp!

There's something odd about a blue eyed Arab, Dave. Then again,
hollywood is good at stirring emotions, yes? :')

[Barney Frank]

"Aardvark" <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in message
news:kn8p8k$9uk$6...@dont-email.me...

[Aardvark]

No, no opinion. Killing the innocent and defenceless is actually murder.
Fact.

> I said kill the fuckers, not murder them.
>

Killing those in captivity who have been found guilty of no crime, in
fact never actually charged with a crime, is murder. You were therefore
advocating murder.

>>>>> Save the money spent on feeding the bastids.
>>>> Why do you advocate cruel and inhumane treatment of men who have been
>>>> detained for years without charge or trial?
>>>
>>> We are at WAR against world wide terrorism.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> That's irrelevant. I repeat my question:
>
> <cut repeated text>
>
>> Any chance of a response?
>
> We are at WAR against world wide terrorism.

So you keep saying, despite its irrelevance.

> The rules change under
> articles of war V peace.
>

Yes, and the Geneva Conventions and protocols govern the treatment of
prisoners. If they are captured military, killing them is murder, if
civilians, killing them is murder.

It seems to me that you and the slimy Limey think that POWs should be
killed, which is an extremely bloodthirsty attitude.

I suppose this is the kind of thing you're both OK with:

<https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1a/
LeonardGSiffleet.jpg/452px-LeonardGSiffleet.jpg>

For the hard of thinking, that's:

<http://snipurl.com/272pdod>

My father took part in a number of executions after the war of people
whose attitudes to the treatment and mistreatment of prisoners, both
military and civilian, was similar to yours. For some reason their
actions were described as 'war crimes'. I bet you're wondering why.

>>>>> I suggest feeding them to the local Kaman.
>>>> Do you mean cayman or K-man?
>>>
>>> Cayman.
>>>
>>>>> That way there won't be any need to burry the bodies.
>>>> What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
>>>
>>> Why are you trying to support people who would kill you as soon as
>>> look at you?
>
>> I'm supporting *no one*. what I *am* supporting is the rule of law,
>> where there's a procedure for dealing with people suspected of
>> committing crimes. These people have never been availed of this legal
>> procedure.
>
>> Again, I ask:
>
>> <cut repeated text>
>
>> Any chance of a response?
>
> See above.

Why are you so willing to make wild statements and then neither back them
up or provide some kind of supporting rationale? This is why embarking on
a discussion with some people is a total waste of time.

[~BD~]

Aardvark wrote:

> My father took part in a number of executions after the war

A heavy load to carry - having a father who was a murderer. :'(
--

[§ñühwö£f]

BushCo suspended Habaeus and Barry never reinstated it, amongst other
broken promises.


--
http://signon.org/sign/protect-americas-wolves
www.snuhwolf.9f.com|www.savewolves.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\

[Aardvark]

Probably, cunt, but I wouldn't know about that.

Can't you *ever* stay on topic, you stupid cunt?

[SeaNymph]

You truly are a hateful, despicable POS, totally lacking in common sense
or decency. How dare you post such a thing about an issue you know
nothing about.

You should be locked away in some deep hole, imo, so no one ever has to
read your vitriol again.

[Eagle]

Aardvark explained on 5/19/2013 :

In your opinion.

>>
>> Yes, it was indeed an opinion.

> No, no opinion. Killing the innocent and defenceless is actually murder.
> Fact.

No, it isn't. They are not innocent. They all have blood on their hands
and are prisoners of war.

>> I said kill the fuckers, not murder them.
>>

> Killing those in captivity who have been found guilty of no crime, in
> fact never actually charged with a crime, is murder. You were therefore
> advocating murder.

No, I was advocating killing the fuckers, not murdering them. There is
a difference.

>>>>>> Save the money spent on feeding the bastids.
>>>>> Why do you advocate cruel and inhumane treatment of men who have been
>>>>> detained for years without charge or trial?
>>>>
>>>> We are at WAR against world wide terrorism.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> That's irrelevant. I repeat my question:
>>
>> <cut repeated text>
>>
>>> Any chance of a response?
>>
>> We are at WAR against world wide terrorism.

> So you keep saying, despite its irrelevance.

That is your opinion, nothing more.

>> The rules change under
>> articles of war V peace.
>>

> Yes, and the Geneva Conventions and protocols govern the treatment of
> prisoners. If they are captured military, killing them is murder, if
> civilians, killing them is murder.

If that were true, all warriors and war fighters are murders.


> It seems to me that you and BD [I fixed your insult to an innocent bystander]

> think that POWs should be killed, which is an extremely bloodthirsty
> attitude.

So? All war is bloodthirsty, you know that.

> I suppose this is the kind of thing you're both OK with:

> <UNREAD LINK>

> For the hard of thinking, that's:

> <DITTO>

> My father took part in a number of executions after the war of people
> whose attitudes to the treatment and mistreatment of prisoners, both
> military and civilian, was similar to yours. For some reason their
> actions were described as 'war crimes'. I bet you're wondering why.

Are you going to spill the beans or think I want to know?

>>>>>> I suggest feeding them to the local Kaman.
>>>>> Do you mean cayman or K-man?
>>>>
>>>> Cayman.
>>>>
>>>>>> That way there won't be any need to burry the bodies.
>>>>> What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
>>>>
>>>> Why are you trying to support people who would kill you as soon as
>>>> look at you?
>>
>>> I'm supporting *no one*. what I *am* supporting is the rule of law,
>>> where there's a procedure for dealing with people suspected of
>>> committing crimes. These people have never been availed of this legal
>>> procedure.
>>
>>> Again, I ask:
>>
>>> <cut repeated text>
>>
>>> Any chance of a response?
>>
>> See above.

> Why are you so willing to make wild statements and then neither back them
> up or provide some kind of supporting rationale? This is why embarking on
> a discussion with some people is a total waste of time.

Then why are you responding?

[Eagle]

§ñühwö£f submitted this idea :

True statement.
Your point being?

[Eagle]

SeaNymph dropped this bomb :

Why do YOU read it?

[~BD~]

Did *your* father also condemn people to die?

I guess he did.

Is *your* burden heavy too?
--

[Eagle]

It happens that ~BD~ formulated :

Isn't she supposedly ignoring you, Dave, or is her reply just another
igg-out-of-convenience technics?

[Jenn]

On 5/19/2013 10:29 AM, Eagle wrote:
> Aardvark explained on 5/19/2013 :

>>This is why
>> embarking on a discussion with some people is a total waste of time.
>
> Then why are you responding?
>

He gets frustrated when he can't make people agree with him. I think
that goes hand in hand with his Tourette's.

--
Jenn

[~BD~]

I've never been able to understand her vitriolic stance, Eagle.

I feel *really* sorry for her ..... but what can *I* do to help her?

--

[SeaNymph]

Don't you ever sully my deceased father's name with your sickness and
hatred. I despise you and everything you do, you are sick and should be
roundly condemned in this group for the hatred you spew.

[Jenn]

On 5/19/2013 10:41 AM, Eagle wrote:
> SeaNymph dropped this bomb :
>> On 5/19/2013 9:29 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>
>>>> My father took part in a number of executions after the war
>>>
>>> A heavy load to carry - having a father who was a murderer. :'(
>>> --
>>>
>> You truly are a hateful, despicable POS, totally lacking in common sense or
>> decency. How dare you post such a thing about an issue you know nothing
>> about.
>
>> You should be locked away in some deep hole, imo, so no one ever has to read
>> your vitriol again.
>
> Why do YOU read it?
>

... because she CAN? roflollllllll

--
Jenn

[~BD~]

I'll take that as a 'yes', then.

--

[Eagle]

Jenn grinned and said :

lol

[Eagle]

~BD~ wrote this mess :

I really don't know, Dave. I've tried several times to get her to be
more friendly, all to have my efforts shoved down my throat. I tried
again last week, all to no avail, and now she is ignoring me. [or so
she says... lol]

[Eagle]

SeaNymph presented the following explanation :

Reading this reply from you, SeaNymph, your hatred for BD is
overwhelming. If there is a sickness here, it's your unbridled hatred
for David.
Think about it. :-(

[Eagle]

Jenn wrote this mess :

He is [or was] trying to be civil with me at least, I'll give him that.
I do appreciate reading his responses without the usual cunt, fuck, and
other assorted foul language, even though his responses are still, for
the most part, combative.

I'm ever hopeful...

[Jenn]

On 5/19/2013 11:59 AM, Eagle wrote:
> Jenn wrote this mess :
>> On 5/19/2013 10:29 AM, Eagle wrote:
>>> Aardvark explained on 5/19/2013 :
>>>> This is why
>>>> embarking on a discussion with some people is a total waste of time.
>>>
>>> Then why are you responding?
>>>
>
>
>> He gets frustrated when he can't make people agree with him. I think
>> that goes hand in hand with his Tourette's.
>
> He is [or was] trying to be civil with me at least, I'll give him that.
> I do appreciate reading his responses without the usual cunt, fuck, and
> other assorted foul language, even though his responses are still, for
> the most part, combative.
>
> I'm ever hopeful...
>

He has to take baby steps! <smile> He won't graduate until he can
interact with me civilly on a consistent basis.

--
Jenn

[Eagle]

Jenn dropped this bomb :

We shall see, Jenn. Hope is the wellspring from which we flow.

How's your Sunday going?
Tucker is having a problem with his digestive system. He woke up this
morning upchucking, and crying from pain. He spewed a palm nut, so it
might be that his intestines are plugged up from those palm nuts. Right
now he's OK, but we are monitoring his bowl movements to see what he
might have ate.

[Jenn]

On 5/19/2013 12:13 PM, Eagle wrote:
> Jenn dropped this bomb :
>> On 5/19/2013 11:59 AM, Eagle wrote:
>>> Jenn wrote this mess :
>>>> On 5/19/2013 10:29 AM, Eagle wrote:
>>>>> Aardvark explained on 5/19/2013 :
>>>>>> This is why
>>>>>> embarking on a discussion with some people is a total waste of time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then why are you responding?
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> He gets frustrated when he can't make people agree with him. I think
>>>> that goes hand in hand with his Tourette's.
>>>
>>> He is [or was] trying to be civil with me at least, I'll give him that.
>>> I do appreciate reading his responses without the usual cunt, fuck, and
>>> other assorted foul language, even though his responses are still, for
>>> the most part, combative.
>>>
>>> I'm ever hopeful...
>>>
>
>> He has to take baby steps! <smile> He won't graduate until he can
>> interact with me civilly on a consistent basis.
>
> We shall see, Jenn. Hope is the wellspring from which we flow.

I gave up on that a long time ago.

> How's your Sunday going?

.. relaxing for a few.

> Tucker is having a problem with his digestive system. He woke up this
> morning upchucking, and crying from pain. He spewed a palm nut, so it
> might be that his intestines are plugged up from those palm nuts. Right
> now he's OK, but we are monitoring his bowl movements to see what he
> might have ate.
>

poor fellow ... hope he gets better, soon.

--
Jenn

[Aardvark]

SeaNymph wrote:

> On 5/19/2013 9:29 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>> Aardvark wrote:
>>
>>> My father took part in a number of executions after the war
>>
>> A heavy load to carry - having a father who was a murderer. :'(
>> --
>>
> You truly are a hateful, despicable POS, totally lacking in common
> sense or decency.

Huh? Because he tried to change the subject by going off on some random
unconnected tangent?

> How dare you post such a thing about an issue you know
> nothing about.
>

He does it all the time, SN. Why change the habits of a lifetime?

> You should be locked away in some deep hole, imo, so no one ever has
> to read your vitriol again.

That's an idea.

[Aardvark]

Eagle wrote:

> Aardvark wrote:

>> This is why embarking on
>> a discussion with some people is a total waste of time.
>
> Then why are you responding?

I'm not. It's pointless with you.

[Aardvark]

Eagle wrote:

> SeaNymph dropped this bomb :
>> On 5/19/2013 9:29 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>
>>>> My father took part in a number of executions after the war
>>>
>>> A heavy load to carry - having a father who was a murderer. :'(
>>> --
>>>
>> You truly are a hateful, despicable POS, totally lacking in common
sense
>> or
>> decency. How dare you post such a thing about an issue you know
nothing
>> about.
>
>> You should be locked away in some deep hole, imo, so no one ever has
to
>> read your vitriol again.
>
> Why do YOU read it?
>

More to the point- why does the slimy Limey cunt *post* it?

[§ñühwö£f]

That you're a fucking idiot.

<nods>

--
http://www.wolfandwildlifestudies.com/index.php
www.friendsofanimals.org |www.snuhwolf.9f.com|

[Eagle]

Aardvark explained on 5/19/2013 :

> Eagle wrote:

>> Aardvark wrote:

>>> This is why embarking on
>>> a discussion with some people is a total waste of time.
>>
>> Then why are you responding?

> I'm not. It's pointless with you.

Not for me. It reaffirmed why I don't like you.

[Eagle]

>> SeaNymph dropped this bomb :
>>> On 5/19/2013 9:29 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> My father took part in a number of executions after the war
>>>>
>>>> A heavy load to carry - having a father who was a murderer. :'(
>>>> --
>>>>
>>> You truly are a hateful, despicable POS, totally lacking in common  sense
>>> or
>>> decency.  How dare you post such a thing about an issue you know  nothing
>>> about.
>>
>>> You should be locked away in some deep hole, imo, so no one ever has  to
>>> read your vitriol again.
>>
>> Why do YOU read it?
>>

 

> More to the point- why does the slimy Limey cunt *post* it?

 

No, that's YOUR view.

[Aardvark]

How many times has that cunt been told *NOT* to mention the familiy
members of other posters? How would you react if he was insulting and
sliming *your* family members?

He's nothing but contemptible scum and deserves nothing but
commensurate treatment.

[Aardvark]

Eagle wrote:

> He is [or was] trying to be civil with me at least, I'll give him
that.

That was a completely pointless exercise, as you proved and as I
expected.

> I do appreciate reading his responses without the usual cunt, fuck,
and
> other assorted foul language, even though his responses are still,
for
> the most part, combative.
>

No, they're not.

> I'm ever hopeful...

Give and you might just get. Until then...

[Aardvark]

Can't you see the slimy Limey cunt's posts? Or is it just the slimy
ones you have a blind spot for?

[SeaNymph]

I'll tell you. Stop talking about me, stop talking to me, and never,
ever mention my family again.

Even better, go find somewhere else to spew you vitriol.

[Eagle]

Aardvark dropped this bomb :

> Eagle wrote:

>>>> SeaNymph dropped this bomb :
>>>>> On 5/19/2013 9:29 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My father took part in a number of executions after the war
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A heavy load to carry - having a father who was a murderer. :'(
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>> You truly are a hateful, despicable POS, totally lacking in common
>>>>> sense or
>>>>> decency. How dare you post such a thing about an issue you know
>>>>> nothing about.
>>>>
>>>>> You should be locked away in some deep hole, imo, so no one ever has
>>>>> to read your vitriol again.
>>>>
>>>> Why do YOU read it?
>>>>
>>
>>> More to the point- why does the slimy Limey cunt *post* it?
>>
>> No, that's YOUR view.
>>

> Can't you see the slimy Limey cunt's posts? Or is it just the slimy
> ones you have a blind spot for?

I have no idea who you are referring to. I don't know this "slimy
limey".

[SeaNymph]

FU and the horse you rode in on. You've left me no choice, and I will
now do what I believe I should have done a long time ago. You're an ass
and the worst kind of person. You deserve every bad thing that's ever
happened to you, and more. You are not a christian in any sense of the
word. You are a bad, evil person who should have the life sucked out of
him by some hell bound succubus.

[Eagle]

SeaNymph explained :

“That's your opinion. Keep it to yourself. Just saying! ”
<XnsA0F7BBCE531F9be...@130.225.254.104>
Posted by Jax/Bear 10/25/2012 at 12:27 pm

[SeaNymph]

Ah, but that's the cult for you. What the hell does he care what I
think about BD? Why isn't he condemning BD for what he said?

[Eagle]

Aardvark wrote this mess :

bull-twinky does it all the time, as did ron. I just keep the maggots
in my dungeon...problem solved.

> He's nothing but contemptible scum and deserves nothing but
> commensurate treatment.

Ever hear of the saying "you get what you give"? Or this one;
"out of sight, out of mind"? Isn't your contemporary doing the same
thing by ignoring? [Or should I say selective ignoring...lol!]

[Eagle]

It happens that SeaNymph formulated :

Far out....lol!
"Hellbound succubus"? buhahahahahaha!

[Aardvark]

So it would seem, SN.

> What the hell does he care what I
> think about BD?

He can use it as an excuse to attack you. I can think of no other
reason.

> Why isn't he condemning BD for what he said?

Rhetorical question, I presume?

[Eagle]

Aardvark dropped this bomb :

> Eagle wrote:

>> He is [or was] trying to be civil with me at least, I'll give him
> that.

> That was a completely pointless exercise, as you proved and as I
> expected.

Agreed. I expected the responses I got.

>> I do appreciate reading his responses without the usual cunt, fuck, and
>> other assorted foul language, even though his responses are still, for
>> the most part, combative.
>>

> No, they're not.

Yes they were.

>> I'm ever hopeful...

> Give and you might just get. Until then...

Ditto.

[Eagle]

§ñühwö£f brought next idea :

> That I'm a fucking idiot.

<nods>

--

[Eagle]

It happens that Aardvark formulated :

lol Frick and frack attack!
The ^5 twins attack!

[SeaNymph]

On 5/19/2013 11:47 AM, Eagle wrote:
> Jenn grinned and said :

>> On 5/19/2013 10:41 AM, Eagle wrote:
>>> SeaNymph dropped this bomb :

>>>> On 5/19/2013 9:29 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> My father took part in a number of executions after the war
>>>>>
>>>>> A heavy load to carry - having a father who was a murderer. :'(
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>> You truly are a hateful, despicable POS, totally lacking in common
>>>> sense or
>>>> decency. How dare you post such a thing about an issue you know
>>>> nothing
>>>> about.
>>>
>>>> You should be locked away in some deep hole, imo, so no one ever has
>>>> to read
>>>> your vitriol again.
>>>

>>> Why do YOU read it?
>>>
>

>> ... because she CAN? roflollllllll
>
> lol

[SeaNymph]

Nobody has to dance to your little drum you pretentious twit.
In fact, people are better off not reading your hate filled crap at all.
Just saying :)

[SeaNymph]

On 5/19/2013 2:19 PM, Aardvark wrote:
> Eagle wrote:
>
>> He is [or was] trying to be civil with me at least, I'll give him
> that.
>
> That was a completely pointless exercise, as you proved and as I
> expected.
>
>> I do appreciate reading his responses without the usual cunt, fuck,
> and
>> other assorted foul language, even though his responses are still,
> for
>> the most part, combative.
>>
>
> No, they're not.
>
>> I'm ever hopeful...
>
> Give and you might just get. Until then...
>

He doesn't believe that at all. He seems to think that everyone has to
be nice to him, be respectful, not question anything he does, and then
maybe, just maybe, he'll do the same.

Funny, he thinks he can waltz right in here, call me every name in the
book, and then wonder why he doesn't get respect. It's SSDD from that
group, do as I say, not as I do. They can all go pound sand for all I care.

[Jax]

Aardvark <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in news:knb882$qo3$1...@dont-email.me:

> Eagle wrote:
>>
>>
>> Reading this reply from you, SeaNymph, your hatred for BD is
>> overwhelming. If there is a sickness here, it's your unbridled hatred
>> for David.
>>
>
> How many times has that cunt been told *NOT* to mention the familiy
> members of other posters?

Not mentioning family members is an arbitrary rule created by those who wish
to prevent reference to what they have previously posted.

Just pointing out the truth!

--
Jax

[Jax]

Aardvark <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in news:knah2u$284$2...@dont-email.me:

> My father took part in a number of executions after the war of people
> whose attitudes to the treatment and mistreatment of prisoners, both
> military and civilian, was similar to yours. For some reason their
> actions were described as 'war crimes'. I bet you're wondering why.

No useless personal information required please. Thank you! :)

--
Jax

[Jax]

SeaNymph <SeaN...@deepbluesea.com> wrote in news:knbbdh$kqg$8...@dont-email.me:

> FU and the horse you rode in on. You've left me no choice, and I will
> now do what I believe I should have done a long time ago. You're an ass
> and the worst kind of person. You deserve every bad thing that's ever
> happened to you, and more. You are not a christian in any sense of the
> word. You are a bad, evil person who should have the life sucked out of
> him by some hell bound succubus.

That's not very nice Linda. Just saying. :(

--
Jax!

[Jax]

"Eagle" <deag...@geemail.com> wrote in news:knavr0$ncp$1...@dont-email.me:

> SeaNymph presented the following explanation :
>> On 5/19/2013 10:34 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Is *your* burden heavy too? --
>>>
>> Don't you ever sully my deceased father's name with your sickness and
>> hatred. I despise you and everything you do, you are sick and should be
>> roundly condemned in this group for the hatred you spew.
>

> Reading this reply from you, SeaNymph, your hatred for BD is
> overwhelming. If there is a sickness here, it's your unbridled hatred
> for David.

Eagle I don't wish to sound mean but I think Linda was just waiting for an
opportunity to spew out her vile and vitriol.

Poor David was in the wrong place at the wrong time. I hope he isn't feeling
too hurt by Linda's display of unrestrained hatred. She's a witch! :(

--
Jax

[Jax]

"Eagle" <deag...@geemail.com> wrote in news:knark1$uum$1...@dont-email.me:

> SeaNymph dropped this bomb :
>> On 5/19/2013 9:29 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>

>>>> My father took part in a number of executions after the war
>>>

>>> A heavy load to carry - having a father who was a murderer. :'( --
>>>
>> You truly are a hateful, despicable POS, totally lacking in common
>> sense or decency. How dare you post such a thing about an issue you
>> know nothing about.
>
>> You should be locked away in some deep hole, imo, so no one ever has to
>> read your vitriol again.
>
> Why do YOU read it?

Eagle..... Aardvark has never worked out how to use his kill file. Just
saying! :)

--
Jax

[SeaNymph]

And you have always been completely unable to follow a conversation.
You are just stupid, and sometimes enormously funny. Just laughing :)

[Jax]

SeaNymph <SeaN...@deepbluesea.com> wrote in news:knbffv$g2l$1...@dont-email.me:

Linda it's lovely to know there's a smile on your usually mirthless face. How
lovely!

Did you enjoy the feeling? For a long time I've been trying to get you to be
less miserable! This could be a breakthrough. :)

--
Jax

[Aardvark]

SeaNymph wrote:

> On 5/19/2013 2:19 PM, Aardvark wrote:
>> Eagle wrote:
>>
>>> He is [or was] trying to be civil with me at least, I'll give him
>> that.
>>
>> That was a completely pointless exercise, as you proved and as I
>> expected.
>>
>>> I do appreciate reading his responses without the usual cunt, fuck,
>> and
>>> other assorted foul language, even though his responses are still,
>> for
>>> the most part, combative.
>>>
>>
>> No, they're not.
>>
>>> I'm ever hopeful...
>>
>> Give and you might just get. Until then...
>>
> He doesn't believe that at all. He seems to think that everyone has to
> be nice to him, be respectful, not question anything he does, and then
> maybe, just maybe, he'll do the same.
>

That much has been evident for quite some time, more so in recent days.

> Funny, he thinks he can waltz right in here, call me every name in the
> book, and then wonder why he doesn't get respect.

Hard to believe, but I witnessed it with my own two eyes, so I *have* to
believe it.

> It's SSDD from that
> group, do as I say, not as I do.

Yup.

> They can all go pound sand for all I
> care.

LOL.

[Eagle]

SeaNymph expects you to read this :

At least you can SAY something. lol

[Eagle]

Jax brought next idea :

Using initials is just like saying the words, Jax.
Can you believe her? "Hell bound succubus"....buhahahahahahaha!!!

[Eagle]

Jax explained on 5/19/2013 :

I know she's a witch, Jax...she called Dave a succubus! lol lol lol

[Eagle]

SeaNymph explained :

Far out, not only is Dave a "pretentious twit" now, but a "hell bound
succubus" as well...buhahahahahahahaha!
Man SN, you get 5 stars for making me roll on the ground laughing!
ROTGLMAO!

[Eagle]

SeaNymph was thinking very hard :

So much for ignoring, eh SN? lol lol lol What did you say about
ignoring someone? Don't talk about them while ignoring them?
buhahahahaha!

[Eagle]

Aardvark has brought this to us :

Yep, you and your paramour have made my day today! Best laugh I've had
in a long time!

[Eagle]

Jax submitted this idea :

Like father like son?

[Aardvark]

Eagle wrote:

> Jax submitted this idea :
>> Aardvark <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
>> news:knah2u$284$2...@dont-email.me:
>
>>> My father took part in a number of executions after the war of people
>>> whose attitudes to the treatment and mistreatment of prisoners, both
>>> military and civilian, was similar to yours. For some reason their
>>> actions were described as 'war crimes'. I bet you're wondering why.
>
>> No useless personal information required please. Thank you! :)
>
> Like father like son?
>

What the fuck was that supposed to mean?

[practice]

On 05/19/2013 05:16 PM, Aardvark wrote:
> Eagle wrote:
>
>> Jax submitted this idea :
>>> Aardvark <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
>>> news:knah2u$284$2...@dont-email.me:
>>
>>>> My father took part in a number of executions after the war of people
>>>> whose attitudes to the treatment and mistreatment of prisoners, both
>>>> military and civilian, was similar to yours. For some reason their
>>>> actions were described as 'war crimes'. I bet you're wondering why.
>>
>>> No useless personal information required please. Thank you! :)
>>
>> Like father like son?
>>
>
> What the fuck was that supposed to mean?
>

Yeah, I'm trying to piece this together, too

[Aardvark]

I have an idea, but it's up to him to explain. Failing that, I'll take my
idea as the only possible solution.

[SeaNymph]

On 5/19/2013 4:24 PM, Jax wrote:
> SeaNymph <SeaN...@deepbluesea.com> wrote in news:knbffv$g2l$1...@dont-email.me:
>
>> On 5/19/2013 4:18 PM, Jax wrote:
>>> "Eagle" <deag...@geemail.com> wrote in news:knark1$uum$1...@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> SeaNymph dropped this bomb :
>>>>> On 5/19/2013 9:29 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>>>> Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My father took part in a number of executions after the war
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A heavy load to carry - having a father who was a murderer. :'( --
>>>>>>
>>>>> You truly are a hateful, despicable POS, totally lacking in common
>>>>> sense or decency. How dare you post such a thing about an issue you
>>>>> know nothing about.
>>>>
>>>>> You should be locked away in some deep hole, imo, so no one ever has to
>>>>> read your vitriol again.
>>>>
>>>> Why do YOU read it?
>>>
>>> Eagle..... Aardvark has never worked out how to use his kill file. Just
>>> saying! :)
>>>
>> And you have always been completely unable to follow a conversation.
>> You are just stupid, and sometimes enormously funny. Just laughing :)
>
> Linda it's lovely to know there's a smile on your usually mirthless face. How
> lovely!

You've never seen my face so how would you know I'm smiling? Just asking :)

>
> Did you enjoy the feeling? For a long time I've been trying to get you to be
> less miserable! This could be a breakthrough. :)
>

You stupid troll, you know nothing about me. All you do is assume,
insinuate and lie. I need nothing from you but I have to admit that
your unwavering stupidity is cause for amusement :)

What's it like to be the stupidest person around :)

[SeaNymph]

Not nearly as much as you make me laugh when your inability to follow a
conversation. I think you're worse than jax in that regard. I was
responding to your BFF jenn. Just laughing at you :)

[SeaNymph]

Are you really that stupid? My opinion, which I am free to post is that
you are as stupid as jax. I've told you before that I don't block
people, ignoring them is something completely different but I see you
can't work that out. Must absolutely suck to be you :)

[SeaNymph]

On 5/19/2013 5:16 PM, Aardvark wrote:
> Eagle wrote:
>
>> Jax submitted this idea :
>>> Aardvark <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
>>> news:knah2u$284$2...@dont-email.me:
>>
>>>> My father took part in a number of executions after the war of people
>>>> whose attitudes to the treatment and mistreatment of prisoners, both
>>>> military and civilian, was similar to yours. For some reason their
>>>> actions were described as 'war crimes'. I bet you're wondering why.
>>
>>> No useless personal information required please. Thank you! :)
>>
>> Like father like son?
>>
>
> What the fuck was that supposed to mean?
>

I do believe he's calling you a murderer again, although I could be
wrong. What a pathetic, hate filled group the cult is.

[SeaNymph]

How would you feel if I insinuated that your father was murderer? Would
that be okay with you? I'm curious because you seem to think that sort
of statement from BD is just fine and dandy.

[SeaNymph]

So, can I start referring to your family members as murderers, and post
that information all across the internet. Obviously you don't have a
problem with that sort of thing, so if I was to do that to you, or
eagle, or jenn, you wouldn't make a peep now, would you? Just asking :)

[Eagle]

SeaNymph expressed precisely :

Na....won't touch this one.... lol

[Eagle]

on 5/20/2013, SeaNymph supposed :

I'd answer you, but you are ignoring me. lol

[Eagle]

SeaNymph explained on 5/20/2013 :

Jax,
I think she's replying to you. She's ignoring me ya know... lol

[Eagle]

What? I can't read you. You're ignoring me.

[Eagle]

SeaNymph has brought this to us :

lol Sometimes you are fun to watch make an ass of yourself, other times
you are just a bore. This is one of those times. <yawn>

[Eagle]

SeaNymph laid this down on his screen :

What was that you called BD? A "hell bound succubus"?
A mighty hateful thing to call someone, SN.
Who is the 'pathetic hate filled cult' now?

[Jenn]

haaaaaahahahaha! I used to respond to Aardvark when he was ignoring me, and
Linda would say stuff like "Why are you responding to someone who clearly
doesn't want to talk to you?" LOLOL

So .. why's she responding to me? Curious minds want to know. <smile>


--
Jenn

[Jax]

SeaNymph <SeaN...@deepbluesea.com> wrote in
news:knd6ul$plf$9...@dont-email.me:

Linda you don't know anything about anyone in my family, so anything you say
is a wild guess. Just saying! :)

--
Jax

[Eagle]

Jenn presented the following explanation :

She's responding to you because she's ignoring you, Jenn. lol

[Jenn]

ohhhhh k ..

--
Jenn

[practice]

My daddy was a killer, a hired killer, worked for the U.S. Government
during WW2 as an anti-aircraft gun operator!

[SeaNymph]

How would that be any different than what you do every single day?
Besides, that really didn't answer the question now, did it?

[Jax]

Aardvark <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in news:knbinl$ad$2...@dont-email.me:

> Eagle wrote:
>
>> Jax submitted this idea :
>>> Aardvark <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
>>> news:knah2u$284$2...@dont-email.me:
>>
>>>> My father took part in a number of executions after the war of people
>>>> whose attitudes to the treatment and mistreatment of prisoners, both
>>>> military and civilian, was similar to yours. For some reason their
>>>> actions were described as 'war crimes'. I bet you're wondering why.
>>
>>> No useless personal information required please. Thank you! :)
>>
>> Like father like son?
>>
>
> What the fuck was that supposed to mean?

Aardvark after you brought your father into the discussion, I think Eagle was
inquiring if there were any similarities between yourself and your father.

Are you able to answer the question? Just wondering!

--
Jax

[Jax]

Aardvark <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in news:knah2u$284$2...@dont-email.me:

> My father took part in a number of executions after the war of people
> whose attitudes to the treatment and mistreatment of prisoners, both
> military and civilian, was similar to yours. For some reason their
> actions were described as 'war crimes'. I bet you're wondering why.

Aardvark is it something to do with the fact that Ireland refused to take
part in the Second World War? Those who fought for the Allies were considered
traitors. Were they executed? Just asking!

--
Jax :)

[Jax]

SeaNymph <SeaN...@deepbluesea.com> wrote in
news:kndn39$1n3$1...@dont-email.me:

Linda in case you don't understand.... I am not under any obligation to
answer questions! :)

--
Jax

[Aardvark]

Indeed, so was my dad, and a volunteer too. Went all the way from Assam to
Rangoon, killing Japanese all the way. Helped kill some when he got there
too. Those ones were tied to posts first, or given a nice thick scarf made
of hemp.

:-)

[SeaNymph]

Ah....of course you're not. But your not answering actually says much
more. Thanks :)