Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

whispers via email and all that strategy going on (WAS: Re: Uhmurikin Gulag Stories)

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Jenn

unread,
May 24, 2013, 12:46:02 PM5/24/13
to
Eagle wrote:
> Jenn was thinking very hard :
>> Eagle wrote:
>>> on 5/23/2013, Jenn supposed :
>>>> On 5/23/2013 10:43 PM, Eagle wrote:
>>>>> SeaNymph formulated on Thursday :
>>>>>> On 5/23/2013 7:33 PM, Eagle wrote:
>>>>>>> SeaNymph expects you to read this :
>>>>>>>> On 5/23/2013 6:33 PM, Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 18:22:58 -0500, SeaNymph wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 5/23/2013 6:11 PM, Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 18:06:14 -0500, SeaNymph wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/23/2013 5:39 PM, Aardvark wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:46:10 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aardvark formulated on Thursday :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:17:08 -0500, SeaNymph wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The truth is that eagle and jenn and bd all claim to be
>>>>>>>>>> "friends". We've
>>>>>>>>>> never made that claim.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Of course not. It's not as if we have any shared RL
>>>>>>>>> experiences. All we
>>>>>>>>> know of each other, all we need to know of each other, is
>>>>>>>>> the pixels we
>>>>>>>>> both cause to appear on the other's monitor screen. I
>>>>>>>>> certainly wouldn't
>>>>>>>>> characterise that as anything approaching friendship. Even
>>>>>>>>> more ridiculous is the notion that we're 'paramours'.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's just another thing that certain posters use in an effort
>>>>>>>> to be insulting, which is just childish. Truth be told, they
>>>>>>>> should tread a little more carefully sometimes, imo, because
>>>>>>>> there are some interesting questions out there about some of
>>>>>>>> their "relationships". Just saying
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh do tell...buhahahahahahaha!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, I could tell plenty, as could others. But I won't and for
>>>>>> the simple reason that I don't believe that sort of thing should
>>>>>> be discussed in a place like this. I don't think that ridiculous
>>>>>> nonsense like you're so fond of has any place in here. But think
>>>>>> about it a bit, and think of some of the things you, and some of
>>>>>> your friends, have posted in here about what you do. You give
>>>>>> away a lot, without even realizing it I believe
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah...uh huh...right.
>>>>>
>>>
>>>> I wonder why they are so proud that they are not friends?? Says a
>>>> lot about them, don't you think?
>
>>> I don't understand their reasoning in this matter. Their idea of
>>> 'friendship' is very different from how we see friendship. The only
>
>> Evidently, they are still living in the past.
>
>
>>> thing missing is the face to face interaction, and that is only a
>>> part of the whole. When you and I finally meet, it will be like
>>> long lost friends getting together. That, and sharing a drink or
>>> two...
>
>
>> yeah!!
>
>>> No SN, this is not a ^5, just two friends [and two non-whatever]
>>> discussing the topic at hand.
>
>> ... non-enemies? haahaha
>
> I suppose. I really don't know what they see their 'relationship'? as
> being. They get along here, and I won't assume how they get on in
> email or skype, that would be for ron to slime about.

I imagine their email conversations are all to do with strategy on how they
will slam someone on usenet!

--
Jenn



SeaNymph

unread,
May 24, 2013, 2:58:53 PM5/24/13
to
So I suppose this conversation is eagle and jenn's way of moving past
the H&D, by passing judgement on others, incorrect judgement?

Jenn is simply too cowardly to face those she insults and slimes.

Eagle

unread,
May 25, 2013, 9:27:57 AM5/25/13
to
on 5/24/2013, SeaNymph supposed :
Is this YOUR way of moving past the H&D, SN?

--
Eagle
Why were the Indians here first? They had reservations.


0 new messages