Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: This is on the house
7 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
~BD~
May 10, 2013, 6:46:21 PM5/10/13
to
RonNNN wrote:
> For Jax especially, and anyone else who might feel the need to know why
> my posting habits are what they are, the reason I don't get involved in
> most in depth conversations is because, unlike the majority here, I
> actually do still have a day job. Yes, I lurk on Groundhog during the day
> when I'm not busy actually working on something, but, as even Jenn can
> attest to, it's not very "post" friendly. I don't have an Internet
> connection at my shop, and I'm happy I don't, otherwise I might have
> ended up like Jenn and GM and not actually *do* any work! [g]
>
> By the time I get home, most, if not everything that can be said about
> any issue has been run through the mill multiple times already. I've
> never been the type to just add a smiley or an IAWTP just to let everyone
> know I've read the posts.
Thank you for explaining, Ron.
> As far as the problems that Eagle and I have, it all started with my
> dislike of his blind defensiveness of Jenn, regardless of what she said,
> or says, right or wrong. It's the same reason I have issues with BD. And
> now, both of the Daves are doing the same thing concerning you, Jax.
Ah! If only you could know the truth. <sigh>
I'm sworn to secrecy! ;-)
> Trying to be "macho men" defending the "poor helpless lass" makes me want
> to puke! All of the women here are able to stand on their own two feet.
Perhaps you read too much into posts, Ron.
> And to top off everything, I don't know how to type... I just hunt and
> peck... so by the time I do want to say something, it's old news!
We have something in common after all! :-)
It may help you to *start* a new thread or two, Ron (just as you have
done, here!)
> For Jax especially, and anyone else who might feel the need to know why
> my posting habits are what they are, the reason I don't get involved in
> most in depth conversations is because, unlike the majority here, I
> actually do still have a day job. Yes, I lurk on Groundhog during the day
> when I'm not busy actually working on something, but, as even Jenn can
> attest to, it's not very "post" friendly. I don't have an Internet
> connection at my shop, and I'm happy I don't, otherwise I might have
> ended up like Jenn and GM and not actually *do* any work! [g]
>
> By the time I get home, most, if not everything that can be said about
> any issue has been run through the mill multiple times already. I've
> never been the type to just add a smiley or an IAWTP just to let everyone
> know I've read the posts.
Thank you for explaining, Ron.
> As far as the problems that Eagle and I have, it all started with my
> dislike of his blind defensiveness of Jenn, regardless of what she said,
> or says, right or wrong. It's the same reason I have issues with BD. And
> now, both of the Daves are doing the same thing concerning you, Jax.
Ah! If only you could know the truth. <sigh>
I'm sworn to secrecy! ;-)
> Trying to be "macho men" defending the "poor helpless lass" makes me want
> to puke! All of the women here are able to stand on their own two feet.
Perhaps you read too much into posts, Ron.
> And to top off everything, I don't know how to type... I just hunt and
> peck... so by the time I do want to say something, it's old news!
We have something in common after all! :-)
It may help you to *start* a new thread or two, Ron (just as you have
done, here!)
SeaNymph
May 10, 2013, 6:58:10 PM5/10/13
to
On 5/10/2013 5:01 PM, RonNNN wrote:
> For Jax especially, and anyone else who might feel the need to know why
> my posting habits are what they are, the reason I don't get involved in
> most in depth conversations is because, unlike the majority here, I
> actually do still have a day job. Yes, I lurk on Groundhog during the day
> when I'm not busy actually working on something, but, as even Jenn can
> attest to, it's not very "post" friendly. I don't have an Internet
> connection at my shop, and I'm happy I don't, otherwise I might have
> ended up like Jenn and GM and not actually *do* any work! [g]
>
> By the time I get home, most, if not everything that can be said about
> any issue has been run through the mill multiple times already. I've
> never been the type to just add a smiley or an IAWTP just to let everyone
> know I've read the posts.
>
> For Jax especially, and anyone else who might feel the need to know why
> my posting habits are what they are, the reason I don't get involved in
> most in depth conversations is because, unlike the majority here, I
> actually do still have a day job. Yes, I lurk on Groundhog during the day
> when I'm not busy actually working on something, but, as even Jenn can
> attest to, it's not very "post" friendly. I don't have an Internet
> connection at my shop, and I'm happy I don't, otherwise I might have
> ended up like Jenn and GM and not actually *do* any work! [g]
>
> By the time I get home, most, if not everything that can be said about
> any issue has been run through the mill multiple times already. I've
> never been the type to just add a smiley or an IAWTP just to let everyone
> know I've read the posts.
>
> As far as the problems that Eagle and I have, it all started with my
> dislike of his blind defensiveness of Jenn, regardless of what she said,
> or says, right or wrong. It's the same reason I have issues with BD. And
> now, both of the Daves are doing the same thing concerning you, Jax.
>
> dislike of his blind defensiveness of Jenn, regardless of what she said,
> or says, right or wrong. It's the same reason I have issues with BD. And
> now, both of the Daves are doing the same thing concerning you, Jax.
>
> Trying to be "macho men" defending the "poor helpless lass" makes me want
> to puke! All of the women here are able to stand on their own two feet.
>
> to puke! All of the women here are able to stand on their own two feet.
>
> And to top off everything, I don't know how to type... I just hunt and
> peck... so by the time I do want to say something, it's old news!
>
Makes sense to me :)
> peck... so by the time I do want to say something, it's old news!
>
I agree with what you've said.
Message has been deleted
OldGringo38
May 10, 2013, 7:26:01 PM5/10/13
to
On 05/10/2013 06:05 PM, RonNNN wrote:
> In article <w9KdnbwAvMQj5RDM...@bt.com>,
> ~BD~@nomail.afraid.org says...
> you and others in your little group are not being truthful in what you
> write, that's not the readers' problem.
> along with for long. That's why I usually only try to start a
> conversation on the weekends.
>
You're so close to right on I wonder if you're cheating <g>
--
OG 38
Just west of nowhere
> In article <w9KdnbwAvMQj5RDM...@bt.com>,
> ~BD~@nomail.afraid.org says...
>>
>> RonNNN wrote:
>>> For Jax especially, and anyone else who might feel the need to know why
>>> my posting habits are what they are, the reason I don't get involved in
>>> most in depth conversations is because, unlike the majority here, I
>>> actually do still have a day job. Yes, I lurk on Groundhog during the day
>>> when I'm not busy actually working on something, but, as even Jenn can
>>> attest to, it's not very "post" friendly. I don't have an Internet
>>> connection at my shop, and I'm happy I don't, otherwise I might have
>>> ended up like Jenn and GM and not actually *do* any work! [g]
>>>
>>> By the time I get home, most, if not everything that can be said about
>>> any issue has been run through the mill multiple times already. I've
>>> never been the type to just add a smiley or an IAWTP just to let everyone
>>> know I've read the posts.
>>
>> Thank you for explaining, Ron.
>>
>>> As far as the problems that Eagle and I have, it all started with my
>>> dislike of his blind defensiveness of Jenn, regardless of what she said,
>>> or says, right or wrong. It's the same reason I have issues with BD. And
>>> now, both of the Daves are doing the same thing concerning you, Jax.
>>
>> Ah! If only you could know the truth. <sigh>
>
> In this environment, the only truth we can know is what we can see. If
>> RonNNN wrote:
>>> For Jax especially, and anyone else who might feel the need to know why
>>> my posting habits are what they are, the reason I don't get involved in
>>> most in depth conversations is because, unlike the majority here, I
>>> actually do still have a day job. Yes, I lurk on Groundhog during the day
>>> when I'm not busy actually working on something, but, as even Jenn can
>>> attest to, it's not very "post" friendly. I don't have an Internet
>>> connection at my shop, and I'm happy I don't, otherwise I might have
>>> ended up like Jenn and GM and not actually *do* any work! [g]
>>>
>>> By the time I get home, most, if not everything that can be said about
>>> any issue has been run through the mill multiple times already. I've
>>> never been the type to just add a smiley or an IAWTP just to let everyone
>>> know I've read the posts.
>>
>> Thank you for explaining, Ron.
>>
>>> As far as the problems that Eagle and I have, it all started with my
>>> dislike of his blind defensiveness of Jenn, regardless of what she said,
>>> or says, right or wrong. It's the same reason I have issues with BD. And
>>> now, both of the Daves are doing the same thing concerning you, Jax.
>>
>> Ah! If only you could know the truth. <sigh>
>
> you and others in your little group are not being truthful in what you
> write, that's not the readers' problem.
>>
>> I'm sworn to secrecy! ;-)
>
> You're sworn to lying, it seems.
>> I'm sworn to secrecy! ;-)
>
>
>>
>>> Trying to be "macho men" defending the "poor helpless lass" makes me want
>>> to puke! All of the women here are able to stand on their own two feet.
>>
>> Perhaps you read too much into posts, Ron.
>
> I'll let others decide if I'm off base or not.
>>
>>> Trying to be "macho men" defending the "poor helpless lass" makes me want
>>> to puke! All of the women here are able to stand on their own two feet.
>>
>> Perhaps you read too much into posts, Ron.
>
>>
>>> And to top off everything, I don't know how to type... I just hunt and
>>> peck... so by the time I do want to say something, it's old news!
>>
>> We have something in common after all! :-)
>>
>> It may help you to *start* a new thread or two, Ron (just as you have
>> done, here!)
>
> I really don't think it's wise to start new threads that I can't play
>>> And to top off everything, I don't know how to type... I just hunt and
>>> peck... so by the time I do want to say something, it's old news!
>>
>> We have something in common after all! :-)
>>
>> It may help you to *start* a new thread or two, Ron (just as you have
>> done, here!)
>
> along with for long. That's why I usually only try to start a
> conversation on the weekends.
>
You're so close to right on I wonder if you're cheating <g>
--
OG 38
Just west of nowhere
Message has been deleted
OldGringo38
May 10, 2013, 7:48:20 PM5/10/13
to
On 05/10/2013 06:38 PM, RonNNN wrote:
> In article <kmjvfc$tc1$1...@dont-email.me>, oldgr...@gmail.com says...
> The one thing I have learned over the years is that it's easier to tell
> the truth than it is to hide a lie. While BD preaches the same thing, I
> have a hard time believing he lives up to that philosophy.
>
> However, I have noticed a notable change in BD after he found out his
> "buds" tried to dump him a while back. Back peddling can be pretty hard I
> guess!
>
<g> So be it.
> In article <kmjvfc$tc1$1...@dont-email.me>, oldgr...@gmail.com says...
> the truth than it is to hide a lie. While BD preaches the same thing, I
> have a hard time believing he lives up to that philosophy.
>
> However, I have noticed a notable change in BD after he found out his
> "buds" tried to dump him a while back. Back peddling can be pretty hard I
> guess!
>
<g> So be it.
FromTheRafters
May 10, 2013, 8:54:29 PM5/10/13
to
RonNNN expressed precisely :
forum. Some servers only posted articles once a day - not like now
where it is comparable in speed to a chat room. I guess progress isn't
always a good thing.
>> RonNNN wrote:
>>> For Jax especially, and anyone else who might feel the need to know why
>>> my posting habits are what they are, the reason I don't get involved in
>>> most in depth conversations is because, unlike the majority here, I
>>> actually do still have a day job. Yes, I lurk on Groundhog during the day
>>> when I'm not busy actually working on something, but, as even Jenn can
>>> attest to, it's not very "post" friendly. I don't have an Internet
>>> connection at my shop, and I'm happy I don't, otherwise I might have
>>> ended up like Jenn and GM and not actually *do* any work! [g]
>>>
>>> By the time I get home, most, if not everything that can be said about
>>> any issue has been run through the mill multiple times already. I've
>>> never been the type to just add a smiley or an IAWTP just to let everyone
>>> know I've read the posts.
>>
>> Thank you for explaining, Ron.
>>
>>> As far as the problems that Eagle and I have, it all started with my
>>> dislike of his blind defensiveness of Jenn, regardless of what she said,
>>> or says, right or wrong. It's the same reason I have issues with BD. And
>>> now, both of the Daves are doing the same thing concerning you, Jax.
>>
>> Ah! If only you could know the truth. <sigh>
>
>>> For Jax especially, and anyone else who might feel the need to know why
>>> my posting habits are what they are, the reason I don't get involved in
>>> most in depth conversations is because, unlike the majority here, I
>>> actually do still have a day job. Yes, I lurk on Groundhog during the day
>>> when I'm not busy actually working on something, but, as even Jenn can
>>> attest to, it's not very "post" friendly. I don't have an Internet
>>> connection at my shop, and I'm happy I don't, otherwise I might have
>>> ended up like Jenn and GM and not actually *do* any work! [g]
>>>
>>> By the time I get home, most, if not everything that can be said about
>>> any issue has been run through the mill multiple times already. I've
>>> never been the type to just add a smiley or an IAWTP just to let everyone
>>> know I've read the posts.
>>
>> Thank you for explaining, Ron.
>>
>>> As far as the problems that Eagle and I have, it all started with my
>>> dislike of his blind defensiveness of Jenn, regardless of what she said,
>>> or says, right or wrong. It's the same reason I have issues with BD. And
>>> now, both of the Daves are doing the same thing concerning you, Jax.
>>
>> Ah! If only you could know the truth. <sigh>
>
> In this environment, the only truth we can know is what we can see. If
> you and others in your little group are not being truthful in what you
> write, that's not the readers' problem.
>>
> you and others in your little group are not being truthful in what you
> write, that's not the readers' problem.
>>
>> I'm sworn to secrecy! ;-)
>
>
> You're sworn to lying, it seems.
>
>>
>
>>
>>> Trying to be "macho men" defending the "poor helpless lass" makes me want
>>> to puke! All of the women here are able to stand on their own two feet.
>>
>> Perhaps you read too much into posts, Ron.
>
>>> to puke! All of the women here are able to stand on their own two feet.
>>
>> Perhaps you read too much into posts, Ron.
>
> I'll let others decide if I'm off base or not.
>>
>>
>>> And to top off everything, I don't know how to type... I just hunt and
>>> peck... so by the time I do want to say something, it's old news!
>>
>> We have something in common after all! :-)
>>
>> It may help you to *start* a new thread or two, Ron (just as you have
>> done, here!)
>
>>> peck... so by the time I do want to say something, it's old news!
>>
>> We have something in common after all! :-)
>>
>> It may help you to *start* a new thread or two, Ron (just as you have
>> done, here!)
>
> I really don't think it's wise to start new threads that I can't play
> along with for long. That's why I usually only try to start a
> conversation on the weekends.
USENET wasn't designed to be a quick back and forth communication
> along with for long. That's why I usually only try to start a
> conversation on the weekends.
forum. Some servers only posted articles once a day - not like now
where it is comparable in speed to a chat room. I guess progress isn't
always a good thing.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Eagle
May 10, 2013, 9:03:41 PM5/10/13
to
on 5/10/2013, SeaNymph supposed :
Of course you do. As long as this waste of humanity agrees with you and
chav boi, you'll agree with anything this punk says.
--
Eagle
Why were the Indians here first? They had reservations.
chav boi, you'll agree with anything this punk says.
--
Eagle
Why were the Indians here first? They had reservations.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Eagle
May 10, 2013, 9:38:29 PM5/10/13
to
G. Morgan expects you to read this :
> you, or Jenn on this group for peace-making.
> Jenn isn't helping matters either.
> It's a lost cause. SN and Jenn will never be nice to each other again
> (if there ever was a time).
> Both need to stop mentioning each other's names for some semblance of a
> S-2-N improvement. I wish I had better filtering capabilities. I may
> install Newsproxy again, or just un-sub.
> (yeah, yeah, yeah -- whoever is the genius that comes up with "don't let
> the door hit you in the ass", is sooooo fucking clever).
I don't know why, but this place is addicting. I was calm and collected
while on vacation from this place, and even posted in annex some. I
just had to come back for a dose of abuse. 8-o
> Eagle wrote:
>>> I agree with what you've said.
>>
>> Of course you do. As long as this waste of humanity agrees with you and
>> chav boi, you'll agree with anything this punk says.
> Fuck it Dave, she has no interest in making things better for herself,
>>> I agree with what you've said.
>>
>> Of course you do. As long as this waste of humanity agrees with you and
>> chav boi, you'll agree with anything this punk says.
> you, or Jenn on this group for peace-making.
> Jenn isn't helping matters either.
> It's a lost cause. SN and Jenn will never be nice to each other again
> (if there ever was a time).
> Both need to stop mentioning each other's names for some semblance of a
> S-2-N improvement. I wish I had better filtering capabilities. I may
> install Newsproxy again, or just un-sub.
> (yeah, yeah, yeah -- whoever is the genius that comes up with "don't let
> the door hit you in the ass", is sooooo fucking clever).
I don't know why, but this place is addicting. I was calm and collected
while on vacation from this place, and even posted in annex some. I
just had to come back for a dose of abuse. 8-o
Eagle
May 10, 2013, 9:40:50 PM5/10/13
to
G. Morgan has brought this to us :
> RonNNN wrote:
>> In article <9u5ro85b3kjt3dapc...@Osama-is-dead.net>,
>> seal...@osama-is-dead.net says...
>>
>> I'm so sorry, but you don't fit into then category of "others".
> I fall into the category of your trainer, we'll get you off peeing on
> newspapers soon enough.
BUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
Pound puppy ron pees again!
> RonNNN wrote:
>> In article <9u5ro85b3kjt3dapc...@Osama-is-dead.net>,
>> seal...@osama-is-dead.net says...
>>>
>>> RonNNN wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'll let others decide if I'm off base or not.
>>>
>>> You're off base, knuckledragger.
>>> RonNNN wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'll let others decide if I'm off base or not.
>>>
>>
>> I'm so sorry, but you don't fit into then category of "others".
> I fall into the category of your trainer, we'll get you off peeing on
> newspapers soon enough.
BUHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
Pound puppy ron pees again!
Message has been deleted
Oldus Fartus
May 10, 2013, 10:24:06 PM5/10/13
to
RonNNN has brought this to us :
BTW, I agree with your OP, sometimes realtime conversations can't
happen.
--
Cheers
Oldus Fartus
> The one thing I have learned over the years is that it's easier to tell
> the truth than it is to hide a lie. While BD preaches the same thing, I
> have a hard time believing he lives up to that philosophy.
>
> However, I have noticed a notable change in BD after he found out his
> "buds" tried to dump him a while back. Back peddling can be pretty hard I
> guess!
Yes, I have noticed that too Ron.
> the truth than it is to hide a lie. While BD preaches the same thing, I
> have a hard time believing he lives up to that philosophy.
>
> However, I have noticed a notable change in BD after he found out his
> "buds" tried to dump him a while back. Back peddling can be pretty hard I
> guess!
BTW, I agree with your OP, sometimes realtime conversations can't
happen.
--
Cheers
Oldus Fartus
~BD~
May 11, 2013, 2:47:22 AM5/11/13
to
>> RonNNN wrote:
>>> For Jax especially, and anyone else who might feel the need to know why
>>> my posting habits are what they are, the reason I don't get involved in
>>> most in depth conversations is because, unlike the majority here, I
>>> actually do still have a day job. Yes, I lurk on Groundhog during the day
>>> when I'm not busy actually working on something, but, as even Jenn can
>>> attest to, it's not very "post" friendly. I don't have an Internet
>>> connection at my shop, and I'm happy I don't, otherwise I might have
>>> ended up like Jenn and GM and not actually *do* any work! [g]
>>>
>>> By the time I get home, most, if not everything that can be said about
>>> any issue has been run through the mill multiple times already. I've
>>> never been the type to just add a smiley or an IAWTP just to let everyone
>>> know I've read the posts.
>>
>> Thank you for explaining, Ron.
>>
>>> As far as the problems that Eagle and I have, it all started with my
>>> dislike of his blind defensiveness of Jenn, regardless of what she said,
>>> or says, right or wrong. It's the same reason I have issues with BD. And
>>> now, both of the Daves are doing the same thing concerning you, Jax.
>>
>> Ah! If only you could know the truth. <sigh>
>
>>> For Jax especially, and anyone else who might feel the need to know why
>>> my posting habits are what they are, the reason I don't get involved in
>>> most in depth conversations is because, unlike the majority here, I
>>> actually do still have a day job. Yes, I lurk on Groundhog during the day
>>> when I'm not busy actually working on something, but, as even Jenn can
>>> attest to, it's not very "post" friendly. I don't have an Internet
>>> connection at my shop, and I'm happy I don't, otherwise I might have
>>> ended up like Jenn and GM and not actually *do* any work! [g]
>>>
>>> By the time I get home, most, if not everything that can be said about
>>> any issue has been run through the mill multiple times already. I've
>>> never been the type to just add a smiley or an IAWTP just to let everyone
>>> know I've read the posts.
>>
>> Thank you for explaining, Ron.
>>
>>> As far as the problems that Eagle and I have, it all started with my
>>> dislike of his blind defensiveness of Jenn, regardless of what she said,
>>> or says, right or wrong. It's the same reason I have issues with BD. And
>>> now, both of the Daves are doing the same thing concerning you, Jax.
>>
>> Ah! If only you could know the truth. <sigh>
>
> In this environment, the only truth we can know is what we can see. If
> you and others in your little group are not being truthful in what you
> write, that's not the readers' problem.
>>
> you and others in your little group are not being truthful in what you
> write, that's not the readers' problem.
>>
>> I'm sworn to secrecy! ;-)
>
>
> You're sworn to lying, it seems.
Rarely do I lie, Ron - but I am human and like you have frailties.
>>> Trying to be "macho men" defending the "poor helpless lass" makes me want
>>> to puke! All of the women here are able to stand on their own two feet.
>>
>> Perhaps you read too much into posts, Ron.
>
> I'll let others decide if I'm off base or not.
Of course.
>>> And to top off everything, I don't know how to type... I just hunt and
>>> peck... so by the time I do want to say something, it's old news!
>>
>> We have something in common after all! :-)
>>
>> It may help you to *start* a new thread or two, Ron (just as you have
>> done, here!)
>
> I really don't think it's wise to start new threads that I can't play
> along with for long. That's why I usually only try to start a
> conversation on the weekends.
I understand that. As you know, today is Saturday!
> along with for long. That's why I usually only try to start a
> conversation on the weekends.
Have a good weekend, Ron. Post and have *fun*, but not at the expense
of others, eh? :-)
--
SeaNymph
May 11, 2013, 9:03:08 AM5/11/13
to
On 5/10/2013 7:59 PM, G. Morgan wrote:
explain why? Otherwise, it's just seems a baseless attack, with no
constructive verbiage attached. :)
> RonNNN wrote:
>
>> I'll let others decide if I'm off base or not.
>
>
>> I'll let others decide if I'm off base or not.
>
> You're off base, knuckledragger.
>
If you disagree with something, don't you think it makes more sense to
>
explain why? Otherwise, it's just seems a baseless attack, with no
constructive verbiage attached. :)
SeaNymph
May 11, 2013, 9:04:17 AM5/11/13
to
don't agree with, but your condemnation is unnecessary, imo.
SeaNymph
May 11, 2013, 9:16:46 AM5/11/13
to
On 5/10/2013 8:33 PM, G. Morgan wrote:
clean up their own house, that's not my problem or my concern. I have
tried, many times, to soothe things over in here but nobody controls
what others do. And why are you blaming me for what other people do, I
don’t control anybody or how anyone posts? I thought you had proclaimed
yourself fair and impartial, seems that’s not the case after all.
no one is. It’s a collection of posters and posts. Jenn is simply
another contributor.
>
> It's a lost cause. SN and Jenn will never be nice to each other again
> (if there ever was a time).
If your goal is be as negative as possible, you've succeeded. I don't
need to trust someone or be friends with them to have a civil
conversation. Fact is, jenn and I share some interests, and we
attempted to have a civil conversation which was ruined by others. I
don't hold grudges and have no objection to conversation with most
people, as long as they don't attempt to control how or what I post.
you're wrong because that statement ignores all the other things going
on in here.
> Eagle wrote:
>
>>> I agree with what you've said.
>>
>> Of course you do. As long as this waste of humanity agrees with you and
>> chav boi, you'll agree with anything this punk says.
>
>
>>> I agree with what you've said.
>>
>> Of course you do. As long as this waste of humanity agrees with you and
>> chav boi, you'll agree with anything this punk says.
>
> Fuck it Dave, she has no interest in making things better for herself,
> you, or Jenn on this group for peace-making.
It's not my job to make things better for other people. If they can't
> you, or Jenn on this group for peace-making.
clean up their own house, that's not my problem or my concern. I have
tried, many times, to soothe things over in here but nobody controls
what others do. And why are you blaming me for what other people do, I
don’t control anybody or how anyone posts? I thought you had proclaimed
yourself fair and impartial, seems that’s not the case after all.
>
> Jenn isn't helping matters either.
No, she isn't. But she is not the single cause of a group wide problem,
> Jenn isn't helping matters either.
no one is. It’s a collection of posters and posts. Jenn is simply
another contributor.
>
> It's a lost cause. SN and Jenn will never be nice to each other again
If your goal is be as negative as possible, you've succeeded. I don't
need to trust someone or be friends with them to have a civil
conversation. Fact is, jenn and I share some interests, and we
attempted to have a civil conversation which was ruined by others. I
don't hold grudges and have no objection to conversation with most
people, as long as they don't attempt to control how or what I post.
>
> Both need to stop mentioning each other's names for some semblance of a
> S-2-N improvement. I wish I had better filtering capabilities. I may
> install Newsproxy again, or just un-sub.
Do whatever you want. But if you think that statement is the answer,
> Both need to stop mentioning each other's names for some semblance of a
> S-2-N improvement. I wish I had better filtering capabilities. I may
> install Newsproxy again, or just un-sub.
you're wrong because that statement ignores all the other things going
on in here.
HMS Beady
May 11, 2013, 9:26:23 AM5/11/13
to
"G. Morgan" <seal...@osama-is-dead.net> wrote in message
news:9u5ro85b3kjt3dapc...@Osama-is-dead.net...
RonNNN wrote:
>I'll let others decide if I'm off base or not.
You're off base, knuckledragger.
--
>I'll let others decide if I'm off base or not.
You're off base, knuckledragger.
What a punk...as with obama all you have is name calling..
Being queer give you the bad attitude.or you not getting any ass??
Eagle
May 11, 2013, 9:29:57 AM5/11/13
to
SeaNymph dropped this bomb :
of this place, and have it thrown back in my face, you have the nerve
to say this? I started a peace drive with you, and that venture was one
of those epic failures because of you constantly picking fights with
Me.
If any form of 'peace' is going to take root here, it will have to be
between you and I, SN.
> I have tried, many times, to soothe things over in here
That's a damn lie. After many attempts to get you to leave the H&D out
of this place, and have it thrown back in my face, you have the nerve
to say this? I started a peace drive with you, and that venture was one
of those epic failures because of you constantly picking fights with
Me.
If any form of 'peace' is going to take root here, it will have to be
between you and I, SN.
Eagle
May 11, 2013, 9:31:25 AM5/11/13
to
SeaNymph explained :
More bullshit.
OldGringo38
May 11, 2013, 9:37:27 AM5/11/13
to
~BD~
May 11, 2013, 9:56:30 AM5/11/13
to
Enjoy your day, OG! :-)
--
OldGringo38
May 11, 2013, 10:37:40 AM5/11/13
to
SeaNymph
May 11, 2013, 10:38:20 AM5/11/13
to
On 5/11/2013 8:29 AM, Eagle wrote:
> SeaNymph dropped this bomb :
>> I have tried, many times, to soothe things over in here
>
> That's a damn lie. After many attempts to get you to leave the H&D out
> of this place, and have it thrown back in my face, you have the nerve to
> say this? I started a peace drive with you, and that venture was one of
> those epic failures because of you constantly picking fights with Me.
>
> If any form of 'peace' is going to take root here, it will have to be
> between you and I, SN.
>
Well, you're free to hold that opinion, I'll just differ. I disagree
> SeaNymph dropped this bomb :
>> I have tried, many times, to soothe things over in here
>
> That's a damn lie. After many attempts to get you to leave the H&D out
> of this place, and have it thrown back in my face, you have the nerve to
> say this? I started a peace drive with you, and that venture was one of
> those epic failures because of you constantly picking fights with Me.
>
> If any form of 'peace' is going to take root here, it will have to be
> between you and I, SN.
>
with your last statement because I have no problem ignoring you. The
true peace, imo, has to come with a reckoning for those who have never
stopped the lies and the slime, those who attack without provocation and
I don't believe that either of those posters is you or I. In fact, I
believe that currently, there are 3 of them and one of them doesn't post
much any more. Please do not assume that you are aware of the posters
I'm referring to.
I don't like your filthy mouth and the things you post about me or
others, for that matter. That statement has nothing to do with what
anyone else does or says. I can't control what people post, I can only
control what I post, so my choice is to respond or ignore. I think the
simplest thing is to ignore. As I've said, I can converse civilly with
almost anyone, as long as they don't tell me what I can or cannot post.
You speak about respect often but frankly, I don't see you giving any.
Respect is earned, or at least that's what I believe.
SeaNymph
May 11, 2013, 10:39:51 AM5/11/13
to
anything. This is exactly the sort of thing that truly precludes any
peace from you, imo. If you don't like what I say, you don't have to
read or respond and you most assuredly don't have to post that sort of
rhetoric which has no constructive value.
Eagle
May 11, 2013, 11:53:15 AM5/11/13
to
SeaNymph dropped this bomb :
ignoring people.
The true peace,
> imo, has to come with a reckoning for those who have never stopped the lies
> and the slime, those who attack without provocation and I don't believe that
> either of those posters is you or I.
Your biased opinion, nothing more.
In fact, I believe that currently,
> there are 3 of them and one of them doesn't post much any more. Please do
> not assume that you are aware of the posters I'm referring to.
Are you trying to hide them? I know of several posters who have moved
on because of the bickering and fighting here, and that includes Me,
you, chav boi, Jenn, BD, karasite, oldus fartus, ron. Some of my annex
friends came here, took a look, and went elsewhere with a 'hell no'
comment to me. We do have quite a reputation all across usenet and
places like facebook. I won't say where I hang out anymore because of
the reputation this place reeks of.
> I don't like your filthy mouth and the things you post about me or others,
> for that matter.
And I don't like how you ignore the filth from your pal chav boi, and
what the karrasite says [among other in your clique] and how you make
lite of your fellow Women being insulted with that very same filth you
complain about from me, while bitching about how I conduct myself here.
That statement has nothing to do with what anyone else does
> or says. I can't control what people post, I can only control what I post,
> so my choice is to respond or ignore.
That's a cop out BIG time. You have no problem whining about how I
treat you, but accept the very same kind of treatment from chav boi
with a smile and a grin. It makes me want to throw up.
I think the simplest thing is to
> ignore.
And yet you complain about Jenn ignoring people? Very hypocritical,
seanymph.
As I've said, I can converse civilly with almost anyone, as long as
> they don't tell me what I can or cannot post.
Then do it. Stop bitching about BD or Jenn, or Me, and stop hiding your
head in the sand when chav boi makes a fool of himself here.
> You speak about respect often but frankly, I don't see you giving any.
> Respect is earned, or at least that's what I believe.
George and I had a discussion about this, and you commented on it,
although saying nothing, or prolly not reading] about my post with him.
I treat people as I am treated, and have so since boyhood. You'll never
see me making unfriendly comments to people I've not met or talked with
beforehand, except where a freshly insults without provocation.
Yep, respect is indeed earned, so if you want respect, give it. That
includes you, seanymph. You make disparaging comments, expect the same
in return.
I hope we don't have to carry on with this line of you said I said,
it's old news and I for one have many logs on the fire so time is
scarce for me.
Are we done, or do we need to carry on with this, seanymph?
[notice I am being respectful by using your chosen nym and not assuming
you know who I am talking with...]
> On 5/11/2013 8:29 AM, Eagle wrote:
>> SeaNymph dropped this bomb :
>>> I have tried, many times, to soothe things over in here
>>
>> That's a damn lie. After many attempts to get you to leave the H&D out
>> of this place, and have it thrown back in my face, you have the nerve to
>> say this? I started a peace drive with you, and that venture was one of
>> those epic failures because of you constantly picking fights with Me.
>>
>> If any form of 'peace' is going to take root here, it will have to be
>> between you and I, SN.
>>
> Well, you're free to hold that opinion, I'll just differ. I disagree with
> your last statement because I have no problem ignoring you.
And yet you continue to post with Me? you have a very odd way of
>> SeaNymph dropped this bomb :
>>> I have tried, many times, to soothe things over in here
>>
>> That's a damn lie. After many attempts to get you to leave the H&D out
>> of this place, and have it thrown back in my face, you have the nerve to
>> say this? I started a peace drive with you, and that venture was one of
>> those epic failures because of you constantly picking fights with Me.
>>
>> If any form of 'peace' is going to take root here, it will have to be
>> between you and I, SN.
>>
> Well, you're free to hold that opinion, I'll just differ. I disagree with
> your last statement because I have no problem ignoring you.
ignoring people.
The true peace,
> imo, has to come with a reckoning for those who have never stopped the lies
> and the slime, those who attack without provocation and I don't believe that
> either of those posters is you or I.
In fact, I believe that currently,
> there are 3 of them and one of them doesn't post much any more. Please do
> not assume that you are aware of the posters I'm referring to.
on because of the bickering and fighting here, and that includes Me,
you, chav boi, Jenn, BD, karasite, oldus fartus, ron. Some of my annex
friends came here, took a look, and went elsewhere with a 'hell no'
comment to me. We do have quite a reputation all across usenet and
places like facebook. I won't say where I hang out anymore because of
the reputation this place reeks of.
> I don't like your filthy mouth and the things you post about me or others,
> for that matter.
what the karrasite says [among other in your clique] and how you make
lite of your fellow Women being insulted with that very same filth you
complain about from me, while bitching about how I conduct myself here.
That statement has nothing to do with what anyone else does
> or says. I can't control what people post, I can only control what I post,
> so my choice is to respond or ignore.
treat you, but accept the very same kind of treatment from chav boi
with a smile and a grin. It makes me want to throw up.
I think the simplest thing is to
> ignore.
seanymph.
As I've said, I can converse civilly with almost anyone, as long as
> they don't tell me what I can or cannot post.
head in the sand when chav boi makes a fool of himself here.
> You speak about respect often but frankly, I don't see you giving any.
> Respect is earned, or at least that's what I believe.
although saying nothing, or prolly not reading] about my post with him.
I treat people as I am treated, and have so since boyhood. You'll never
see me making unfriendly comments to people I've not met or talked with
beforehand, except where a freshly insults without provocation.
Yep, respect is indeed earned, so if you want respect, give it. That
includes you, seanymph. You make disparaging comments, expect the same
in return.
I hope we don't have to carry on with this line of you said I said,
it's old news and I for one have many logs on the fire so time is
scarce for me.
Are we done, or do we need to carry on with this, seanymph?
[notice I am being respectful by using your chosen nym and not assuming
you know who I am talking with...]
Eagle
May 11, 2013, 11:54:04 AM5/11/13
to
on 5/11/2013, SeaNymph supposed :
It's my opinion of what you are alluding to.
Aardvark
May 11, 2013, 12:03:35 PM5/11/13
to
On Sat, 11 May 2013 08:53:15 -0700, Eagliar wrote:
> I treat people as I am treated, and have so since boyhood.
Another one of your lies, monkey-boi. Do you recall that three weeks you
> I treat people as I am treated, and have so since boyhood.
insulted and attacked me and for the whole time I continued being civil
with you, just as I had previously been? I certainly remember, as I made
a point of doing it at the time. You *still* owe me that three weeks, and
much more.
--
"I am not made like anyone I have seen; I dare believe I am not made
like anyone in existence. If I am not better, at least I am different."
-Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778)
Eagle
May 11, 2013, 1:03:57 PM5/11/13
to
After serious thinking chav boi wrote :
We got on fine until you were rude to Jenn, and that's when I fed your
rudeness back to you. You couldn't handle what you give, so you
ploinked me and made a fuss about doing so.
I made several attempts at mending that rift between us, always using
your chosen nym of Aardvark while you continued using 'monkey-boi'.
You are a rock headed, meatheaded, chav with no respect for anyone
other than yourself, and you just hate it when I call you on your
fucked up behavior. Despite what you say, your foul language is NOT
Acceptable in civilized groups such as this. Only a low brow uneducated
knuckledragger such as you use that kind of language. Even the asshole
ron doesn't use such language in groups with Women present! In my clan,
I would be de-gloved should I treat Women like you do.
Fuck your three weeks of mistreatment, you deserved every second of it.
Now, go away, you knucklehead chav, and drink your ass to death.
> On Sat, 11 May 2013 08:53:15 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>> I treat people as I am treated, and have so since boyhood.
> Another one of your lies, monkey-boi. Do you recall that three weeks you
> insulted and attacked me and for the whole time I continued being civil
> with you, just as I had previously been? I certainly remember, as I made
> a point of doing it at the time. You *still* owe me that three weeks, and
> much more.
BULLSHIT.
>> I treat people as I am treated, and have so since boyhood.
> Another one of your lies, monkey-boi. Do you recall that three weeks you
> insulted and attacked me and for the whole time I continued being civil
> with you, just as I had previously been? I certainly remember, as I made
> a point of doing it at the time. You *still* owe me that three weeks, and
> much more.
We got on fine until you were rude to Jenn, and that's when I fed your
rudeness back to you. You couldn't handle what you give, so you
ploinked me and made a fuss about doing so.
I made several attempts at mending that rift between us, always using
your chosen nym of Aardvark while you continued using 'monkey-boi'.
You are a rock headed, meatheaded, chav with no respect for anyone
other than yourself, and you just hate it when I call you on your
fucked up behavior. Despite what you say, your foul language is NOT
Acceptable in civilized groups such as this. Only a low brow uneducated
knuckledragger such as you use that kind of language. Even the asshole
ron doesn't use such language in groups with Women present! In my clan,
I would be de-gloved should I treat Women like you do.
Fuck your three weeks of mistreatment, you deserved every second of it.
Now, go away, you knucklehead chav, and drink your ass to death.
Aardvark
May 11, 2013, 1:11:06 PM5/11/13
to
On Sat, 11 May 2013 10:03:57 -0700, Eagliar wrote:
> After serious thinking Aardvark wrote :
Was I in *any* way rude or combative to *you* before or during that three
weeks you saw fit to begin insulting and attacking me, monkey-boi? Of
course not. I had done absolutely *nothing* to you to cause your
*unprovoked* attacks.
How either of us relates to other posters was and is completely
irrelevant.
> After serious thinking Aardvark wrote :
>> On Sat, 11 May 2013 08:53:15 -0700, Eagliar wrote:
>
>>> I treat people as I am treated, and have so since boyhood.
>
>> Another one of your lies, monkey-boi. Do you recall that three weeks
>> you insulted and attacked me and for the whole time I continued being
>> civil with you, just as I had previously been? I certainly remember, as
>> I made a point of doing it at the time. You *still* owe me that three
>> weeks, and much more.
>
> BULLSHIT.
> We got on fine until you were rude to <SNIP IRRELEVANCE>
>
>>> I treat people as I am treated, and have so since boyhood.
>
>> Another one of your lies, monkey-boi. Do you recall that three weeks
>> you insulted and attacked me and for the whole time I continued being
>> civil with you, just as I had previously been? I certainly remember, as
>> I made a point of doing it at the time. You *still* owe me that three
>> weeks, and much more.
>
> BULLSHIT.
Was I in *any* way rude or combative to *you* before or during that three
weeks you saw fit to begin insulting and attacking me, monkey-boi? Of
course not. I had done absolutely *nothing* to you to cause your
*unprovoked* attacks.
How either of us relates to other posters was and is completely
irrelevant.
Eagle
May 11, 2013, 1:22:37 PM5/11/13
to
chav boi presented the following explanation :
It's completely relevant. Just because you had me blocked doesn't mean
you are off the scope of being treated like you treat people.
Like I said, you deserved every bit of that abuse, and still do, chav
boi.
> How either of us relates to other posters was and is completely
> irrelevant.
BULLSHIT.
> irrelevant.
It's completely relevant. Just because you had me blocked doesn't mean
you are off the scope of being treated like you treat people.
Like I said, you deserved every bit of that abuse, and still do, chav
boi.
Jax
May 11, 2013, 1:57:31 PM5/11/13
to
RonNNN <nr...@charter.net> wrote in
news:MPG.2bf72a2ef...@news.eternal-september.org:
> For Jax especially, and anyone else who might feel the need to know why
> my posting habits are what they are, the reason I don't get involved in
> most in depth conversations is because, unlike the majority here, I
> actually do still have a day job. Yes, I lurk on Groundhog during the
> day when I'm not busy actually working on something, but, as even Jenn
> can attest to, it's not very "post" friendly. I don't have an Internet
> connection at my shop, and I'm happy I don't, otherwise I might have
> ended up like Jenn and GM and not actually *do* any work! [g]
>
> By the time I get home, most, if not everything that can be said about
> any issue has been run through the mill multiple times already. I've
> never been the type to just add a smiley or an IAWTP just to let
> everyone know I've read the posts.
>
> As far as the problems that Eagle and I have, it all started with my
> dislike of his blind defensiveness of Jenn, regardless of what she said,
> or says, right or wrong. It's the same reason I have issues with BD. And
> now, both of the Daves are doing the same thing concerning you, Jax.
>
> Trying to be "macho men" defending the "poor helpless lass" makes me
> want to puke! All of the women here are able to stand on their own two
> feet.
>
> And to top off everything, I don't know how to type... I just hunt and
> peck... so by the time I do want to say something, it's old news!
Ron thank you for explaining you behavior. I wonder if your explanation will
be accepted by the group!
--
Jax :)
news:MPG.2bf72a2ef...@news.eternal-september.org:
> For Jax especially, and anyone else who might feel the need to know why
> my posting habits are what they are, the reason I don't get involved in
> most in depth conversations is because, unlike the majority here, I
> actually do still have a day job. Yes, I lurk on Groundhog during the
> day when I'm not busy actually working on something, but, as even Jenn
> can attest to, it's not very "post" friendly. I don't have an Internet
> connection at my shop, and I'm happy I don't, otherwise I might have
> ended up like Jenn and GM and not actually *do* any work! [g]
>
> By the time I get home, most, if not everything that can be said about
> any issue has been run through the mill multiple times already. I've
> never been the type to just add a smiley or an IAWTP just to let
> everyone know I've read the posts.
>
> As far as the problems that Eagle and I have, it all started with my
> dislike of his blind defensiveness of Jenn, regardless of what she said,
> or says, right or wrong. It's the same reason I have issues with BD. And
> now, both of the Daves are doing the same thing concerning you, Jax.
>
> Trying to be "macho men" defending the "poor helpless lass" makes me
> want to puke! All of the women here are able to stand on their own two
> feet.
>
> And to top off everything, I don't know how to type... I just hunt and
> peck... so by the time I do want to say something, it's old news!
be accepted by the group!
--
Jax :)
Jax
May 11, 2013, 2:01:51 PM5/11/13
to
Aardvark <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in news:kmlu3a$u6i$3...@dont-email.me:
> On Sat, 11 May 2013 10:03:57 -0700, Eagliar wrote:
>
>> After serious thinking Aardvark wrote :
>>> On Sat, 11 May 2013 08:53:15 -0700, Eagliar wrote:
>>
>>>> I treat people as I am treated, and have so since boyhood.
>>
>>> Another one of your lies, monkey-boi. Do you recall that three weeks
>>> you insulted and attacked me and for the whole time I continued being
>>> civil with you, just as I had previously been? I certainly remember, as
>>> I made a point of doing it at the time. You *still* owe me that three
>>> weeks, and much more.
>>
>> BULLSHIT.
>> We got on fine until you were rude to <SNIP IRRELEVANCE>
>
> Was I in *any* way rude or combative to *you* before or during that three
> weeks you saw fit to begin insulting and attacking me, monkey-boi? Of
> course not.
>
> I had done absolutely *nothing* to you to cause your
> *unprovoked* attacks.
Aardvark you have a very short memory of the very nasty tone of most of
your posts to Eagle. Just saying.
> How either of us relates to other posters was and is completely
> irrelevant.
--
Jax :)
> On Sat, 11 May 2013 10:03:57 -0700, Eagliar wrote:
>
>> After serious thinking Aardvark wrote :
>>> On Sat, 11 May 2013 08:53:15 -0700, Eagliar wrote:
>>
>>>> I treat people as I am treated, and have so since boyhood.
>>
>>> Another one of your lies, monkey-boi. Do you recall that three weeks
>>> you insulted and attacked me and for the whole time I continued being
>>> civil with you, just as I had previously been? I certainly remember, as
>>> I made a point of doing it at the time. You *still* owe me that three
>>> weeks, and much more.
>>
>> BULLSHIT.
>> We got on fine until you were rude to <SNIP IRRELEVANCE>
>
> Was I in *any* way rude or combative to *you* before or during that three
> weeks you saw fit to begin insulting and attacking me, monkey-boi? Of
> course not.
>
> I had done absolutely *nothing* to you to cause your
> *unprovoked* attacks.
your posts to Eagle. Just saying.
> How either of us relates to other posters was and is completely
> irrelevant.
--
Jax
May 11, 2013, 2:02:38 PM5/11/13
to
"Eagle" <deag...@geemail.com> wrote in news:kmk788$usb$1...@dont-email.me:
Eagle I guess you like the challenge! :)
--
Jax
--
Jax
Jax
May 11, 2013, 2:04:49 PM5/11/13
to
FromTheRafters <err...@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in news:kmk4l9$k0t$1@dont-
email.me:
> USENET wasn't designed to be a quick back and forth communication
> forum. Some servers only posted articles once a day - not like now
> where it is comparable in speed to a chat room. I guess progress isn't
> always a good thing.
Rafters, you're right.... this group is the closest thing to a chat room!
--
Jax :)
email.me:
> USENET wasn't designed to be a quick back and forth communication
> forum. Some servers only posted articles once a day - not like now
> where it is comparable in speed to a chat room. I guess progress isn't
> always a good thing.
Rafters, you're right.... this group is the closest thing to a chat room!
--
Jax :)
Aardvark
May 11, 2013, 2:05:09 PM5/11/13
to
On Sat, 11 May 2013 10:22:37 -0700, Eagliar wrote:
> Aardvark presented the following explanation :
Why the fuck should I give a shit how a poster I relate well to relates
to other posters, no matter how I happen to get on with those other
posters? For instance, I get on well with G. Morgan, and he gets on well
with posters I can't stand. The two are unconnected. As long as he and I
get on, why should I care about who else he does or doesn't get on with?
> Aardvark presented the following explanation :
>> How either of us relates to other posters was and is completely
>> irrelevant.
>
> BULLSHIT.
>
> It's completely relevant.
Nope. Not in the least, monkey-boi.
>> irrelevant.
>
> BULLSHIT.
>
> It's completely relevant.
Why the fuck should I give a shit how a poster I relate well to relates
to other posters, no matter how I happen to get on with those other
posters? For instance, I get on well with G. Morgan, and he gets on well
with posters I can't stand. The two are unconnected. As long as he and I
get on, why should I care about who else he does or doesn't get on with?
Eagle
May 11, 2013, 2:25:11 PM5/11/13
to
Jax explained :
lol Yeah...the challenge... :D
Eagle
May 11, 2013, 2:26:15 PM5/11/13
to
Jax explained :
Reasoning with him is next to impossible.
>> How either of us relates to other posters was and is completely
>> irrelevant.
--
>> How either of us relates to other posters was and is completely
>> irrelevant.
--
Eagle
May 11, 2013, 2:26:38 PM5/11/13
to
Jax laid this down on his screen :
FUCK NO!
Message has been deleted
OldGringo38
May 11, 2013, 2:38:06 PM5/11/13
to
On 05/11/2013 01:32 PM, RonNNN wrote:
> In article <kmm2ag$gl3$1...@dont-email.me>, deag...@geemail.com says...
> Dave, please put your sock back on, and finish your vacation away.
>
I'd be willing to pay his passage on a world cruise abort the Costa
Concordia if he'll go.
> In article <kmm2ag$gl3$1...@dont-email.me>, deag...@geemail.com says...
>
I'd be willing to pay his passage on a world cruise abort the Costa
Concordia if he'll go.
Aardvark
May 11, 2013, 2:53:22 PM5/11/13
to
On Sat, 11 May 2013 11:26:15 -0700, Eagliar wrote:
> The lying, slimy, fraudulent, stalking cunt wrote:
>> Aardvark you have a very short memory of the very nasty tone of most of
>> your posts to Eagle. Just saying.
>
> Reasoning with him is next to impossible.
LOL. How the fuck would you know, monkey-boi? You've never fucking tried
it.
> The lying, slimy, fraudulent, stalking cunt wrote:
>> Aardvark you have a very short memory of the very nasty tone of most of
>> your posts to Eagle. Just saying.
>
> Reasoning with him is next to impossible.
it.
Eagle
May 11, 2013, 3:01:50 PM5/11/13
to
OldGringo38 presented the following explanation :
months.
> I'd be willing to pay his passage on a world cruise abort the Costa Concordia
> if he'll go.
Would you send me the cash instead? I'd like to go home for a few
> if he'll go.
months.
OldGringo38
May 11, 2013, 3:17:57 PM5/11/13
to
On 05/11/2013 02:01 PM, Eagle wrote:
> OldGringo38 presented the following explanation :
>> I'd be willing to pay his passage on a world cruise abort the Costa
>> Concordia if he'll go.
>
> Would you send me the cash instead? I'd like to go home for a few months.
>
Tickets are nonrefundable, and nontransferable.
> OldGringo38 presented the following explanation :
>> I'd be willing to pay his passage on a world cruise abort the Costa
>> Concordia if he'll go.
>
> Would you send me the cash instead? I'd like to go home for a few months.
>
Message has been deleted
OldGringo38
May 11, 2013, 3:48:17 PM5/11/13
to
On 05/11/2013 02:23 PM, RonNNN wrote:
> In article <kmm5a6$kn$1...@dont-email.me>, oldgr...@gmail.com says...
> And one way??? [g]
>
No return fairs included. You got it.
> In article <kmm5a6$kn$1...@dont-email.me>, oldgr...@gmail.com says...
>
No return fairs included. You got it.
Eagle
May 11, 2013, 4:11:47 PM5/11/13
to
OldGringo38 submitted this idea :
Well that's not a very nice thing to offer me OG. I wouldn't do that,
but a trip on the Concorde might be a possibility for you.
but a trip on the Concorde might be a possibility for you.
SeaNymph
May 11, 2013, 7:34:22 PM5/11/13
to
On 5/11/2013 10:53 AM, Eagle wrote:
> SeaNymph dropped this bomb :
>> On 5/11/2013 8:29 AM, Eagle wrote:
>>> SeaNymph dropped this bomb :
>>>> I have tried, many times, to soothe things over in here
>>>
>>> That's a damn lie. After many attempts to get you to leave the H&D out
>>> of this place, and have it thrown back in my face, you have the nerve to
>>> say this? I started a peace drive with you, and that venture was one of
>>> those epic failures because of you constantly picking fights with Me.
>>>
>>> If any form of 'peace' is going to take root here, it will have to be
>>> between you and I, SN.
>>>
>> Well, you're free to hold that opinion, I'll just differ. I disagree
>> with your last statement because I have no problem ignoring you.
>
> And yet you continue to post with Me? you have a very odd way of
> ignoring people.
I'm being civil. Do you have a problem with that?
> SeaNymph dropped this bomb :
>> On 5/11/2013 8:29 AM, Eagle wrote:
>>> SeaNymph dropped this bomb :
>>>> I have tried, many times, to soothe things over in here
>>>
>>> That's a damn lie. After many attempts to get you to leave the H&D out
>>> of this place, and have it thrown back in my face, you have the nerve to
>>> say this? I started a peace drive with you, and that venture was one of
>>> those epic failures because of you constantly picking fights with Me.
>>>
>>> If any form of 'peace' is going to take root here, it will have to be
>>> between you and I, SN.
>>>
>> Well, you're free to hold that opinion, I'll just differ. I disagree
>> with your last statement because I have no problem ignoring you.
>
> And yet you continue to post with Me? you have a very odd way of
> ignoring people.
>
> The true peace,
>> imo, has to come with a reckoning for those who have never stopped the
>> lies and the slime, those who attack without provocation and I don't
>> believe that either of those posters is you or I.
>
> Your biased opinion, nothing more.
>
>
> In fact, I believe that currently,
>> there are 3 of them and one of them doesn't post much any more.
>> Please do not assume that you are aware of the posters I'm referring to.
>
> Are you trying to hide them? I know of several posters who have moved on
> because of the bickering and fighting here, and that includes Me, you,
> chav boi, Jenn, BD, karasite, oldus fartus, ron. Some of my annex
> friends came here, took a look, and went elsewhere with a 'hell no'
> comment to me. We do have quite a reputation all across usenet and
> places like facebook. I won't say where I hang out anymore because of
> the reputation this place reeks of.
I’m not discussing all these other posters. I don’t control them, I
>
> In fact, I believe that currently,
>> there are 3 of them and one of them doesn't post much any more.
>> Please do not assume that you are aware of the posters I'm referring to.
>
> Are you trying to hide them? I know of several posters who have moved on
> because of the bickering and fighting here, and that includes Me, you,
> chav boi, Jenn, BD, karasite, oldus fartus, ron. Some of my annex
> friends came here, took a look, and went elsewhere with a 'hell no'
> comment to me. We do have quite a reputation all across usenet and
> places like facebook. I won't say where I hang out anymore because of
> the reputation this place reeks of.
believe that bringing them into this discussion is counter productive.
>> I don't like your filthy mouth and the things you post about me or
>> others, for that matter.
>
> And I don't like how you ignore the filth from your pal chav boi, and
> what the karrasite says [among other in your clique] and how you make
> lite of your fellow Women being insulted with that very same filth you
> complain about from me, while bitching about how I conduct myself here.
conducive to an actual discussion. I don't control anyone, and you are
responsible for what you do.
>
> That statement has nothing to do with what anyone else does
>> or says. I can't control what people post, I can only control what I
>> post, so my choice is to respond or ignore.
>
> That's a cop out BIG time. You have no problem whining about how I treat
> you, but accept the very same kind of treatment from chav boi with a
> smile and a grin. It makes me want to throw up.
Throw up all you want. Better yet, go back and read some of the hate
> That statement has nothing to do with what anyone else does
>> or says. I can't control what people post, I can only control what I
>> post, so my choice is to respond or ignore.
>
> That's a cop out BIG time. You have no problem whining about how I treat
> you, but accept the very same kind of treatment from chav boi with a
> smile and a grin. It makes me want to throw up.
and slime and lies that jax has posted and then tell me she doesn't
deserve every bit of contempt she gets. She has lied about people, she
tried to get others to provide my personal information to her, legally
or otherwise so she could post it in here and it sickens me.
>
> I think the simplest thing is to
>> ignore.
>
> And yet you complain about Jenn ignoring people? Very hypocritical,
> seanymph.
I don't ignore people and continue to insult them. I consider that
> I think the simplest thing is to
>> ignore.
>
> And yet you complain about Jenn ignoring people? Very hypocritical,
> seanymph.
extremely cowardly, childish and offensive behavior. I don’t post to
have fun at someone else’s expense. That’s pretty low in my book.
>
> As I've said, I can converse civilly with almost anyone, as long as
>> they don't tell me what I can or cannot post.
>
> Then do it. Stop bitching about BD or Jenn, or Me, and stop hiding your
> head in the sand when chav boi makes a fool of himself here.
What anyone else does is not my issue. I don't know how many times I
> As I've said, I can converse civilly with almost anyone, as long as
>> they don't tell me what I can or cannot post.
>
> Then do it. Stop bitching about BD or Jenn, or Me, and stop hiding your
> head in the sand when chav boi makes a fool of himself here.
have to tell you that before it sinks in. You don't address the issues
I raise, you just keep bringing others up.
>
>> You speak about respect often but frankly, I don't see you giving any.
>> Respect is earned, or at least that's what I believe.
>
> George and I had a discussion about this, and you commented on it,
> although saying nothing, or prolly not reading] about my post with him.
> I treat people as I am treated, and have so since boyhood. You'll never
> see me making unfriendly comments to people I've not met or talked with
> beforehand, except where a freshly insults without provocation.
> Yep, respect is indeed earned, so if you want respect, give it. That
> includes you, seanymph. You make disparaging comments, expect the same
> in return.
You came in here after being gone for some time and all you did was
>> You speak about respect often but frankly, I don't see you giving any.
>> Respect is earned, or at least that's what I believe.
>
> George and I had a discussion about this, and you commented on it,
> although saying nothing, or prolly not reading] about my post with him.
> I treat people as I am treated, and have so since boyhood. You'll never
> see me making unfriendly comments to people I've not met or talked with
> beforehand, except where a freshly insults without provocation.
> Yep, respect is indeed earned, so if you want respect, give it. That
> includes you, seanymph. You make disparaging comments, expect the same
> in return.
insult me in the worst possible manner you could. You insulted me, as a
person and as a woman, with your filthy posts, filled with the rudest
and crudest crap you could come up with. You have a lot of nerve telling
me how to act when you are unwilling to do the same. Fact is, you are
either the bigger person and stop playing that silly game of "you did so
will I", or not. The notion that you treat someone as you were treated
is ludicrous, imo. Nobody was even talking to you, yet all you did was
insult myself and others. And yet you still somehow expect people to
treat you with respect?
> I hope we don't have to carry on with this line of you said I said, it's
> old news and I for one have many logs on the fire so time is scarce for me.
> Are we done, or do we need to carry on with this, seanymph?
> [notice I am being respectful by using your chosen nym and not assuming
> you know who I am talking with...]
>
SeaNymph
May 11, 2013, 7:35:43 PM5/11/13
to
On 5/11/2013 12:03 PM, Eagle wrote:
> After serious thinking chav boi wrote :
>> On Sat, 11 May 2013 08:53:15 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>
>>> I treat people as I am treated, and have so since boyhood.
>
>> Another one of your lies, monkey-boi. Do you recall that three weeks
>> you insulted and attacked me and for the whole time I continued being
>> civil with you, just as I had previously been? I certainly remember,
>> as I made a point of doing it at the time. You *still* owe me that
>> three weeks, and much more.
>
> BULLSHIT.
> We got on fine until you were rude to Jenn, and that's when I fed your
> rudeness back to you. You couldn't handle what you give, so you ploinked
> me and made a fuss about doing so.
And therein lies the problem, imo. You are clearly stating that you
> After serious thinking chav boi wrote :
>> On Sat, 11 May 2013 08:53:15 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>
>>> I treat people as I am treated, and have so since boyhood.
>
>> Another one of your lies, monkey-boi. Do you recall that three weeks
>> you insulted and attacked me and for the whole time I continued being
>> civil with you, just as I had previously been? I certainly remember,
>> as I made a point of doing it at the time. You *still* owe me that
>> three weeks, and much more.
>
> BULLSHIT.
> We got on fine until you were rude to Jenn, and that's when I fed your
> rudeness back to you. You couldn't handle what you give, so you ploinked
> me and made a fuss about doing so.
attacked Aardvark, not for anything he'd done to you, but because of
Jenn. I'm of the opinion that is the wrong thing to do.
SeaNymph
May 11, 2013, 7:36:51 PM5/11/13
to
SeaNymph
May 11, 2013, 7:37:24 PM5/11/13
to
Aardvark
May 11, 2013, 7:41:33 PM5/11/13
to
On Sat, 11 May 2013 18:35:43 -0500, SeaNymph wrote:
> On 5/11/2013 12:03 PM, Eagle wrote:
>> After serious thinking chav boi wrote :
>>> On Sat, 11 May 2013 08:53:15 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>>
>>>> I treat people as I am treated, and have so since boyhood.
>>
>>> Another one of your lies, monkey-boi. Do you recall that three weeks
>>> you insulted and attacked me and for the whole time I continued being
>>> civil with you, just as I had previously been? I certainly remember,
>>> as I made a point of doing it at the time. You *still* owe me that
>>> three weeks, and much more.
>>
>> BULLSHIT.
>> We got on fine until you were rude to Jenn, and that's when I fed your
>> rudeness back to you. You couldn't handle what you give, so you
>> ploinked me and made a fuss about doing so.
>
> And therein lies the problem, imo.
Indeed.
> On 5/11/2013 12:03 PM, Eagle wrote:
>> After serious thinking chav boi wrote :
>>> On Sat, 11 May 2013 08:53:15 -0700, Eagle wrote:
>>
>>>> I treat people as I am treated, and have so since boyhood.
>>
>>> Another one of your lies, monkey-boi. Do you recall that three weeks
>>> you insulted and attacked me and for the whole time I continued being
>>> civil with you, just as I had previously been? I certainly remember,
>>> as I made a point of doing it at the time. You *still* owe me that
>>> three weeks, and much more.
>>
>> BULLSHIT.
>> We got on fine until you were rude to Jenn, and that's when I fed your
>> rudeness back to you. You couldn't handle what you give, so you
>> ploinked me and made a fuss about doing so.
>
> And therein lies the problem, imo.
> You are clearly stating that you
> attacked Aardvark, not for anything he'd done to you, but because of
> Jenn.
on, it's *their* problem, not his.
> I'm of the opinion that is the wrong thing to do.
Aardvark
May 11, 2013, 7:42:56 PM5/11/13
to
its 'contribution' with the weight it deserves. :-)
~BD~
May 11, 2013, 7:50:46 PM5/11/13
to
Aardvark , speaking of Dave Eagle said ...
When did Aardvark last hug *his* mother, I wonder.
--
> I don't see him do the right thing much.
Eagle has been looking after his elderly mother on a daily basis.
When did Aardvark last hug *his* mother, I wonder.
--
Aardvark
May 11, 2013, 8:01:07 PM5/11/13
to
On Sun, 12 May 2013 00:50:46 +0100, the lying, slimy, cowardly, *STUPID*
cunt wrote:
> Aardvark , speaking of Dave Eagle said ...
>> I don't see him do the right thing much.
>
> Eagle has been looking after his elderly mother on a daily basis.
>
I have absolutely no interest in the private and personal lives of other
cunt wrote:
> Aardvark , speaking of Dave Eagle said ...
>> I don't see him do the right thing much.
>
> Eagle has been looking after his elderly mother on a daily basis.
>
posters, you stupid cunt, and I expect them to have none in mine.
> When did Aardvark last <SNIP IMPERTINENCE>
Still far to fucking stupid to follow even the simplest of instructions I
see, you slimy cunt? *DON'T* fucking mention my family.
~BD~
May 11, 2013, 8:18:05 PM5/11/13
to
Aardvark declared ......
> I have absolutely no interest in the private and personal lives of other
> posters....
His statement says it all. :-(
I also strongly suspect that Aardvark has little interest in anyone in
real life either - other than himself.
--
> I have absolutely no interest in the private and personal lives of other
His statement says it all. :-(
I also strongly suspect that Aardvark has little interest in anyone in
real life either - other than himself.
--
Eagle
May 11, 2013, 8:25:33 PM5/11/13
to
SeaNymph dropped this bomb :
Your opinion is yours and you have every right to it. That doesn't make
it right though.
You jump in when chav boi is under the gun, so what's the difference
between my supporting Jenn and you supporting chav boi?
it right though.
You jump in when chav boi is under the gun, so what's the difference
between my supporting Jenn and you supporting chav boi?
John Karras
May 11, 2013, 9:02:04 PM5/11/13
to
~The Slimey Limey~ wrote:
> Aardvark , speaking of The Eagliar, said ...
mention that fact?
> When did Aardvark last hug *his* mother, I wonder.
That's got to be "none of your business." Why do you care?
> Aardvark , speaking of The Eagliar, said ...
>> I don't see him do the right thing much.
>
> Eagle has been looking after his elderly mother on a daily basis.
..all the while having time to frequently post as "Signe." Why won't you
>
> Eagle has been looking after his elderly mother on a daily basis.
mention that fact?
> When did Aardvark last hug *his* mother, I wonder.
Eagle
May 11, 2013, 9:12:52 PM5/11/13
to
~BD~
May 12, 2013, 4:14:52 AM5/12/13
to
John Karras wrote:
> ~The Slimey Limey~ wrote:
>
>> Aardvark , speaking of The Eagliar, said ...
>>> I don't see him do the right thing much.
>>
>> Eagle has been looking after his elderly mother on a daily basis.
>
> ..all the while having time to frequently post as "Signe." Why won't you
> mention that fact?
I only have your assessment of that fact. I've not seen Eagle confirm
> ~The Slimey Limey~ wrote:
>
>> Aardvark , speaking of The Eagliar, said ...
>>> I don't see him do the right thing much.
>>
>> Eagle has been looking after his elderly mother on a daily basis.
>
> ..all the while having time to frequently post as "Signe." Why won't you
> mention that fact?
that it was him posting a 'signe'.
>> When did Aardvark last hug *his* mother, I wonder.
>
> That's got to be "none of your business." Why do you care?
That is a massive question. I suggest you start a new thread.
Is *your* mother still alive John Karras?
--
Oldus Fartus
May 12, 2013, 5:07:29 AM5/12/13
to
~BD~ presented the following explanation :
brought into the loop regarding 'Signe' - another example of your
friend's regard for you eh?
It's old news now anyway, time to move on.
--
Cheers
Oldus Fartus
> John Karras wrote:
>> ~The Slimey Limey~ wrote:
>>
>>> Aardvark , speaking of The Eagliar, said ...
>>>> I don't see him do the right thing much.
>>>
>>> Eagle has been looking after his elderly mother on a daily basis.
>>
>> ..all the while having time to frequently post as "Signe." Why won't you
>> mention that fact?
>
> I only have your assessment of that fact. I've not seen Eagle confirm that it
> was him posting a 'signe'.
>
Believe it or not Dave, I actually believe you that you were not
>> ~The Slimey Limey~ wrote:
>>
>>> Aardvark , speaking of The Eagliar, said ...
>>>> I don't see him do the right thing much.
>>>
>>> Eagle has been looking after his elderly mother on a daily basis.
>>
>> ..all the while having time to frequently post as "Signe." Why won't you
>> mention that fact?
>
> I only have your assessment of that fact. I've not seen Eagle confirm that it
> was him posting a 'signe'.
>
brought into the loop regarding 'Signe' - another example of your
friend's regard for you eh?
It's old news now anyway, time to move on.
--
Cheers
Oldus Fartus
John Karras
May 12, 2013, 8:32:31 AM5/12/13
to
~The Slimey Limey~ wrote:
> John Karras wrote:
>> ~The Slimey Limey~ wrote:
>>> Aardvark , speaking of The Eagliar, said ...
>>>> I don't see him do the right thing much.
>>>
>>> Eagle has been looking after his elderly mother on a daily basis.
>>
>> ..all the while having time to frequently post as "Signe." Why won't
>> you mention that fact?
>
> I only have your assessment of that fact. I've not seen Eagle confirm
> that it was him posting a 'signe'.
<snort!> You expect him to *admit* "Signe" was him? Proof was published,
> John Karras wrote:
>> ~The Slimey Limey~ wrote:
>>> Aardvark , speaking of The Eagliar, said ...
>>>> I don't see him do the right thing much.
>>>
>>> Eagle has been looking after his elderly mother on a daily basis.
>>
>> ..all the while having time to frequently post as "Signe." Why won't
>> you mention that fact?
>
> I only have your assessment of that fact. I've not seen Eagle confirm
> that it was him posting a 'signe'.
and I'm sure you read it. "c89db7e400c1d5a741cb3f5f2b59e7ac". During his
"absence" he posted over 320 times as "Signe" using at least two different
newsreaders, MesNews and Thunderbird. Here, he even replied to himself:
Message-ID: <kmdfa8$83k$1...@dont-email.me>
Message-ID: <kmemk7$gse$1...@dont-email.me>
>>> When did Aardvark last hug *his* mother, I wonder.
>>
>> That's got to be "none of your business." Why do you care?
>
> Why do I care about people?
>
> That is a massive question. I suggest you start a new thread.
> Is *your* mother still alive John Karras?
SeaNymph
May 12, 2013, 9:13:59 AM5/12/13
to
others is highly inappropriate. Your comments are designed to elicit
negativity and since people don't do that to you, you really should stop
doing it, imo.
SeaNymph
May 12, 2013, 9:15:00 AM5/12/13
to
in the group?
I have no interest in the personal lives of others, other than that
which they freely share. Frankly, it's not my business and there's
nothing wrong with that.
SeaNymph
May 12, 2013, 9:16:27 AM5/12/13
to
People are free to share what they wish, the solicitation of personal
information is not appropriate, imo.
As for your contention of carrying, I'll just that one a lie, based on
my experience with you and what I've seen you do to others.
SeaNymph
May 12, 2013, 9:18:41 AM5/12/13
to
of their statements, but I don't insult and attack in someone else's
name. I'm able to fight my own battles if need be. Jenn always says
she can do the same, yet this sort of stuff tends to make that statement
a lie. Look, it's well known that she went to BD and got him to attack
me for her. BD's admitted to that.
People need to fight their own battles, support their own opinions and
beliefs and not incite others to do it for them. I believe that if
people are incapable of that, this isn't the place for them.
SeaNymph
May 12, 2013, 9:20:22 AM5/12/13
to
post. Bit disingenuous don't you think?
Eagle
May 12, 2013, 10:07:02 AM5/12/13
to
SeaNymph presented the following explanation :
Nope, because you do that very think to me, and that is being
disingenuous.
disingenuous.
SeaNymph
May 12, 2013, 10:16:38 AM5/12/13
to
Personally, I find it ridiculous. As a rule, I try very hard not to
tell others what to do. I try to suggest, or I express my opinion
concerning an issue. I'm not always successful, but I do try. You,
OTOH, tend to blame others for what you do. The truth is, what I do has
nothing to do with what you have chosen to do. That "tit for tat"
mindset is silly and counter productive, imo.
So, the next time I actually tell you to do something, please point it
out and I'll try not to do it again because I believe that's the correct
thing to do.
Eagle
May 12, 2013, 10:38:35 AM5/12/13
to
something, and is guilty of that very same thing, It makes my blood
boil, and I speak up about it.
I hate hypocracy.
Message has been deleted
Aardvark
May 12, 2013, 11:19:56 AM5/12/13
to
Aardvark
May 12, 2013, 11:26:08 AM5/12/13
to
On Sun, 12 May 2013 09:43:05 -0500, RonNNN wrote:
> In article <kmo9ac$hdq$1...@dont-email.me>, deag...@geemail.com says...
>
>> I hate hypocracy.
>
> Now *that* is rich!
I was far too stunned to respond, Ron.
> In article <kmo9ac$hdq$1...@dont-email.me>, deag...@geemail.com says...
>
>> I hate hypocracy.
>
> Now *that* is rich!
I was far too stunned to respond, Ron.
~BD~
May 12, 2013, 11:33:50 AM5/12/13
to
SeaNymph wrote:
> On 5/11/2013 6:50 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>> Aardvark , speaking of Dave Eagle said ...
>>> I don't see him do the right thing much.
>>
>> Eagle has been looking after his elderly mother on a daily basis.
>>
>> When did Aardvark last hug *his* mother, I wonder.
>>
>> --
>>
>>
> Please stop BD. Your ongoing need to mention the family members of
> others is highly inappropriate.
I give it a whirl (in the interest of world peace!)
> On 5/11/2013 6:50 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>> Aardvark , speaking of Dave Eagle said ...
>>> I don't see him do the right thing much.
>>
>> Eagle has been looking after his elderly mother on a daily basis.
>>
>> When did Aardvark last hug *his* mother, I wonder.
>>
>> --
>>
>>
> Please stop BD. Your ongoing need to mention the family members of
> others is highly inappropriate.
> Your comments are designed to elicit negativity and since people don't do that to you, you really should stop doing it, imo.
designed to do likewise?
He really should stop doing it. *Please tell him so*.
--
FromTheRafters
May 12, 2013, 11:36:15 AM5/12/13
to
Aardvark brought next idea :
I used to know what that word meant, now it seems to just be a
superfluous word identical to other more general words mostly used to
insult.
superfluous word identical to other more general words mostly used to
insult.
~BD~
May 12, 2013, 11:47:29 AM5/12/13
to
SeaNymph wrote:
> On 5/11/2013 7:18 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>> Aardvark declared ......
>>
>>> I have absolutely no interest in the private and personal lives of other
>>> posters....
>>
>> His statement says it all. :-(
>>
>> I also strongly suspect that Aardvark has little interest in anyone in
>> real life either - other than himself.
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
> Why do you deliberately set out to start trouble and inflame negativity
> in the group?
Does the truth hurt? Seems to me that you are very much like Aardvark
> On 5/11/2013 7:18 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>> Aardvark declared ......
>>
>>> I have absolutely no interest in the private and personal lives of other
>>> posters....
>>
>> His statement says it all. :-(
>>
>> I also strongly suspect that Aardvark has little interest in anyone in
>> real life either - other than himself.
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
> Why do you deliberately set out to start trouble and inflame negativity
> in the group?
yourself!
> I have no interest in the personal lives of others, other than that
> which they freely share. Frankly, it's not my business and there's
> nothing wrong with that.
in RL.
Tell me - do you have an IFA to advise you and your other half? Does
that IFA not ask deep and searching questions in order to give you the
very best advice? You may call them by another name.
Asking questions was what I was trained to do. I was considered to be
very good at what I did, SeaNymph. One of the star sales folk, in fact!
Can you recall for which American company I worked? Do you recall how
many of my colleagues were killed in the Twin Towers disaster?
**
Independent Financial Advisers or IFAs are professionals who offer
independent advice on financial matters to their clients and recommend
suitable financial products from the whole of the market. The term was
developed to reflect a UK regulatory position and has a specific UK
meaning, although it has been adopted in other parts of the world, such
as Hong Kong.
The term "Independent Financial Adviser" was coined to describe the
advisers working independently for their clients rather than
representing an insurance company, bank or bancassurer. At the time
(1988) the UK government was introducing the polarisation regime which
forced advisers to either be tied to a single insurer or product
provider or to be an independent practitioner. The term is commonly used
in the United Kingdom where IFAs are regulated by the Financial Services
Authority (FSA) and must meet strict qualification and competence
requirements.
Typically an Independent Financial Adviser will conduct a detailed
survey of their client’s financial position, preferences and objectives;
this is sometimes known as a ‘factfind’. They will then advise
appropriate action to meet the client's objectives; and if necessary
recommend a suitable financial product to match the client’s needs.
Individuals and businesses consult IFAs on many matters including
investment, retirement planning, insurance, protection and mortgages (or
other loans). IFAs also advise on some tax and legal matters.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_Financial_Adviser
--
Eagle
May 12, 2013, 11:57:03 AM5/12/13
to
FromTheRafters explained :
Especially since Polly is my Mom's white name.
BurfordTJustice
May 12, 2013, 12:06:26 PM5/12/13
to
"~BD~" <~BD~@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in message
news:a-KdnbHs3LcPJBLM...@bt.com...
Does the truth hurt? Seems to me that you are very much like Aardvark
yourself!
Why are you afraid to ask Trish?
Seems to me that you are very much like Aardvark
yourself!
Jax
May 12, 2013, 12:24:49 PM5/12/13
to
Aardvark <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
news:kmml20$enn$2...@dont-email.me:
> On Sat, 11 May 2013 18:36:51 -0500, SeaNymph wrote:
>
>> On 5/11/2013 1:01 PM, Jax wrote:
>>> Aardvark <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
>>> news:kmlu3a$u6i$3...@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 11 May 2013 10:03:57 -0700, Eagliar wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> After serious thinking Aardvark wrote :
>>>>
>>>> Was I in *any* way rude or combative to *you* before or during that
>>>> three weeks you saw fit to begin insulting and attacking me,
>>>> monkey-boi? Of course not.
>>>>
>>>> I had done absolutely *nothing* to you to cause your *unprovoked*
>>>> attacks.
>>>
>>> Aardvark you have a very short memory of the very nasty tone of most
>>> of your posts to Eagle. Just saying.
>>>
>>>
>>>> How either of us relates to other posters was and is completely
>>>> irrelevant.
>>>
>>>
>> Jax, please stay out of it.
>
> The troll may join in as much as it wants to, and I'll continue to treat
> its 'contribution' with the weight it deserves. :-)
Aardavrk there is no need to use every opportunity to be nasty and
malicious towards me. I mean you no harm.
Don't be so afraid that you feel you have to defend yourself all the time.
Please de-stress. :)
--
Jax!
news:kmml20$enn$2...@dont-email.me:
> On Sat, 11 May 2013 18:36:51 -0500, SeaNymph wrote:
>
>> On 5/11/2013 1:01 PM, Jax wrote:
>>> Aardvark <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
>>> news:kmlu3a$u6i$3...@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 11 May 2013 10:03:57 -0700, Eagliar wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> After serious thinking Aardvark wrote :
>>>>>> On Sat, 11 May 2013 08:53:15 -0700, Eagliar wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I treat people as I am treated, and have so since boyhood.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Another one of your lies, monkey-boi. Do you recall that three
>>>>>> weeks you insulted and attacked me and for the whole time I
>>>>>> continued being civil with you, just as I had previously been? I
>>>>>> certainly remember, as I made a point of doing it at the time. You
>>>>>> *still* owe me that three weeks, and much more.
>>>>>
>>>>> BULLSHIT. We got on fine until you were rude to <SNIP IRRELEVANCE>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I treat people as I am treated, and have so since boyhood.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Another one of your lies, monkey-boi. Do you recall that three
>>>>>> weeks you insulted and attacked me and for the whole time I
>>>>>> continued being civil with you, just as I had previously been? I
>>>>>> certainly remember, as I made a point of doing it at the time. You
>>>>>> *still* owe me that three weeks, and much more.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Was I in *any* way rude or combative to *you* before or during that
>>>> three weeks you saw fit to begin insulting and attacking me,
>>>> monkey-boi? Of course not.
>>>>
>>>> I had done absolutely *nothing* to you to cause your *unprovoked*
>>>> attacks.
>>>
>>> Aardvark you have a very short memory of the very nasty tone of most
>>> of your posts to Eagle. Just saying.
>>>
>>>
>>>> How either of us relates to other posters was and is completely
>>>> irrelevant.
>>>
>>>
>> Jax, please stay out of it.
>
> The troll may join in as much as it wants to, and I'll continue to treat
> its 'contribution' with the weight it deserves. :-)
Aardavrk there is no need to use every opportunity to be nasty and
malicious towards me. I mean you no harm.
Don't be so afraid that you feel you have to defend yourself all the time.
Please de-stress. :)
--
Jax!
Aardvark
May 12, 2013, 12:27:23 PM5/12/13
to
> I mean you no harm.
>
You've proven I'm right in thinking so numerous times.
> Don't be so afraid that you feel you have to defend yourself all the
> time.
like you and the slimy Limey.
> Please de-stress.
Huh? Who the fuck is stressed, cunt?
Jax
May 12, 2013, 12:32:32 PM5/12/13
to
John Karras <jka...@nospam.invalid> wrote in news:kmmpmc$ura$1@dont-
email.me:
John I wonder if Aardvark uses "eefective language" when speaking to his
mother? I hope not! :)
--
Jax
email.me:
mother? I hope not! :)
--
Jax
Jax
May 12, 2013, 12:41:48 PM5/12/13
to
Aardvark <aard...@aardvark.uk.tc> wrote in
news:kmoftb$ica$1...@dont-email.me:
> On Sun, 12 May 2013 17:24:49 +0100,Jax wrote:
>>
>>
>> Aardavrk there is no need to use every opportunity to be nasty and
>> malicious towards me.
>
> That's why I don't, you slimy cunt.
>
>> I mean you no harm.
>>
>
> Yeah, right. I wouldn't trust you as far as I could fucking spit, troll.
> You've proven I'm right in thinking so numerous times.
>
>> Don't be so afraid that you feel you have to defend yourself all the
>> time.
>
> 'Defend' myself, you stupid cunt? I merely express my contempt for cunts
> like you and the slimy Limey.
>
>> Please de-stress.
>
> Huh? Who the fuck is stressed, cunt?
AArdvark what harm have I actually caused you? None. I am not your enemy.
Think about it! :)
--
Jax
news:kmoftb$ica$1...@dont-email.me:
> On Sun, 12 May 2013 17:24:49 +0100,Jax wrote:
>>
>>
>> Aardavrk there is no need to use every opportunity to be nasty and
>> malicious towards me.
>
> That's why I don't, you slimy cunt.
>
>> I mean you no harm.
>>
>
> Yeah, right. I wouldn't trust you as far as I could fucking spit, troll.
> You've proven I'm right in thinking so numerous times.
>
>> Don't be so afraid that you feel you have to defend yourself all the
>> time.
>
> 'Defend' myself, you stupid cunt? I merely express my contempt for cunts
> like you and the slimy Limey.
>
>> Please de-stress.
>
> Huh? Who the fuck is stressed, cunt?
Think about it! :)
--
Jax
Eagle
May 12, 2013, 12:49:18 PM5/12/13
to
Jax laid this down on his screen :
Don't worry about it Jax, that's just how he expresses his most
passionate feelings.
passionate feelings.
SeaNymph
May 12, 2013, 6:01:08 PM5/12/13
to
SeaNymph
May 12, 2013, 6:01:46 PM5/12/13
to
your statement.
SeaNymph
May 12, 2013, 6:03:12 PM5/12/13
to
On 5/12/2013 10:47 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
> SeaNymph wrote:
>> On 5/11/2013 7:18 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>> Aardvark declared ......
>>>
>>>> I have absolutely no interest in the private and personal lives of
>>>> other
>>>> posters....
>>>
>>> His statement says it all. :-(
>>>
>>> I also strongly suspect that Aardvark has little interest in anyone in
>>> real life either - other than himself.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Why do you deliberately set out to start trouble and inflame negativity
>> in the group?
>
> Does the truth hurt? Seems to me that you are very much like Aardvark
> yourself!
You didn't answer the question.
> SeaNymph wrote:
>> On 5/11/2013 7:18 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>> Aardvark declared ......
>>>
>>>> I have absolutely no interest in the private and personal lives of
>>>> other
>>>> posters....
>>>
>>> His statement says it all. :-(
>>>
>>> I also strongly suspect that Aardvark has little interest in anyone in
>>> real life either - other than himself.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Why do you deliberately set out to start trouble and inflame negativity
>> in the group?
>
> Does the truth hurt? Seems to me that you are very much like Aardvark
> yourself!
>
>> I have no interest in the personal lives of others, other than that
>> which they freely share. Frankly, it's not my business and there's
>> nothing wrong with that.
>
> How different we are! I *love* to get to know people - both in here and
> in RL.
>
> Tell me - do you have an IFA to advise you and your other half? Does
> that IFA not ask deep and searching questions in order to give you the
> very best advice? You may call them by another name.
>
> Asking questions was what I was trained to do. I was considered to be
> very good at what I did, SeaNymph. One of the star sales folk, in fact!
> Can you recall for which American company I worked? Do you recall how
> many of my colleagues were killed in the Twin Towers disaster?
>
SeaNymph
May 12, 2013, 6:03:50 PM5/12/13
to
mentioning the family members of others.
SeaNymph
May 12, 2013, 6:04:52 PM5/12/13
to
On 5/12/2013 10:33 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
> SeaNymph wrote:
>> On 5/11/2013 6:50 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>> Aardvark , speaking of Dave Eagle said ...
>>>> I don't see him do the right thing much.
>>>
>>> Eagle has been looking after his elderly mother on a daily basis.
>>>
>>> When did Aardvark last hug *his* mother, I wonder.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>> Please stop BD. Your ongoing need to mention the family members of
>> others is highly inappropriate.
>
> I give it a whirl (in the interest of world peace!)
I believe that when I see it.
> SeaNymph wrote:
>> On 5/11/2013 6:50 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>> Aardvark , speaking of Dave Eagle said ...
>>>> I don't see him do the right thing much.
>>>
>>> Eagle has been looking after his elderly mother on a daily basis.
>>>
>>> When did Aardvark last hug *his* mother, I wonder.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>> Please stop BD. Your ongoing need to mention the family members of
>> others is highly inappropriate.
>
> I give it a whirl (in the interest of world peace!)
>
>> Your comments are designed to elicit negativity and since people don't
>> do that to you, you really should stop doing it, imo.
>
> Do you not consider that Aardvarks perpetual use of foul language is
> designed to do likewise?
frankly, the 2 of you just beg for it with your negativity and hate,
with your lies and slime.
>
SeaNymph
May 12, 2013, 6:05:33 PM5/12/13
to
is hypocrisy in people you don't like.
~BD~
May 12, 2013, 6:49:47 PM5/12/13
to
SeaNymph wrote:
> On 5/12/2013 10:47 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>> SeaNymph wrote:
>>> On 5/11/2013 7:18 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> Aardvark declared ......
>>>>
>>>>> I have absolutely no interest in the private and personal lives of
>>>>> other
>>>>> posters....
>>>>
>>>> His statement says it all. :-(
>>>>
>>>> I also strongly suspect that Aardvark has little interest in anyone in
>>>> real life either - other than himself.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Why do you deliberately set out to start trouble and inflame negativity
>>> in the group?
>>
>> Does the truth hurt? Seems to me that you are very much like Aardvark
>> yourself!
>
> You didn't answer the question.
>
>>
>>> I have no interest in the personal lives of others, other than that
>>> which they freely share. Frankly, it's not my business and there's
>>> nothing wrong with that.
>>
>> How different we are! I *love* to get to know people - both in here and
>> in RL.
>
> Asking personal questions is inappropriate.
No, no it's not.
> On 5/12/2013 10:47 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>> SeaNymph wrote:
>>> On 5/11/2013 7:18 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> Aardvark declared ......
>>>>
>>>>> I have absolutely no interest in the private and personal lives of
>>>>> other
>>>>> posters....
>>>>
>>>> His statement says it all. :-(
>>>>
>>>> I also strongly suspect that Aardvark has little interest in anyone in
>>>> real life either - other than himself.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Why do you deliberately set out to start trouble and inflame negativity
>>> in the group?
>>
>> Does the truth hurt? Seems to me that you are very much like Aardvark
>> yourself!
>
> You didn't answer the question.
>
>>
>>> I have no interest in the personal lives of others, other than that
>>> which they freely share. Frankly, it's not my business and there's
>>> nothing wrong with that.
>>
>> How different we are! I *love* to get to know people - both in here and
>> in RL.
>
> Asking personal questions is inappropriate.
>> Tell me - do you have an IFA to advise you and your other half? Does
>> that IFA not ask deep and searching questions in order to give you the
>> very best advice? You may call them by another name.
>
> Totally irrelevant.
>
>>
>> Asking questions was what I was trained to do. I was considered to be
>> very good at what I did, SeaNymph. One of the star sales folk, in fact!
>> Can you recall for which American company I worked? Do you recall how
>> many of my colleagues were killed in the Twin Towers disaster?
>
> Irrelevant and avoidance.
It is SeaNymph who avoids the truth. I have no real idea why - yet!
I wonder if her neighbours will be making enquiries about her soon. The
folk living in her house *could* be up to no good. Best to check, eh?
--
~BD~
May 12, 2013, 6:53:43 PM5/12/13
to
SeaNymph wrote:
> On 5/12/2013 10:33 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>> SeaNymph wrote:
>>> On 5/11/2013 6:50 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> Aardvark , speaking of Dave Eagle said ...
>>>>> I don't see him do the right thing much.
>>>>
>>>> Eagle has been looking after his elderly mother on a daily basis.
>>>>
>>>> When did Aardvark last hug *his* mother, I wonder.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Please stop BD. Your ongoing need to mention the family members of
>>> others is highly inappropriate.
>>
>> I give it a whirl (in the interest of world peace!)
>
> I believe that when I see it.
It's in your siggy, not mine!
> On 5/12/2013 10:33 AM, ~BD~ wrote:
>> SeaNymph wrote:
>>> On 5/11/2013 6:50 PM, ~BD~ wrote:
>>>> Aardvark , speaking of Dave Eagle said ...
>>>>> I don't see him do the right thing much.
>>>>
>>>> Eagle has been looking after his elderly mother on a daily basis.
>>>>
>>>> When did Aardvark last hug *his* mother, I wonder.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Please stop BD. Your ongoing need to mention the family members of
>>> others is highly inappropriate.
>>
>> I give it a whirl (in the interest of world peace!)
>
> I believe that when I see it.
>>> Your comments are designed to elicit negativity and since people don't
>>> do that to you, you really should stop doing it, imo.
>>
>> Do you not consider that Aardvarks perpetual use of foul language is
>> designed to do likewise?
>
> Actually, no I don't. He only addresses you and jax that way and
> frankly, the 2 of you just beg for it with your negativity and hate,
> with your lies and slime.
Telling! :-)
--
Eagle
May 12, 2013, 6:58:12 PM5/12/13
to
SeaNymph has brought this to us :
That's your choice.
You only seem to hate what you perceive is
> hypocrisy in people you don't like.
Not true. If it were, I wouldn't be exchanging thoughts with you.
Have you counted the posts between you and I? I also am trying to keep
your responses intact because I know you dislike having your posts
chopped up and parts deleted.
We are communicating, and that is a big step from how we were.
You only seem to hate what you perceive is
> hypocrisy in people you don't like.
Have you counted the posts between you and I? I also am trying to keep
your responses intact because I know you dislike having your posts
chopped up and parts deleted.
We are communicating, and that is a big step from how we were.
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages