O'Reilly's War on Christmas Bullshit
Mr. September
'War on Christmas'
By David Neiwert Wednesday Dec 09, 2009 6:00pm
Bill O'Reilly decided to bring in Fox's newest big-name hire, John Stossel,
to help buck up his annual pledge drive in the War on Christmas.
Namely, he was citing as somehow authoritative ("I trust the folks") an
online poll from an outfit called "StandForChristmas.com". Stossel briefly
mentions that it actually was run by another group, and O'Reilly talks over
him and emphasizes that it's "StandForChristmas."
Of course, "StandForChristmas" is actually run by the religious-right cranks
at James Dobson's Focus on the Family. So there's an obvious bias built into
the poll and its potential viewers in the first place. And then to treat the
results of any open online poll as meaningful in any real sense is just
palpable nonsense.
What would Christmas be without a warm cup of Bill O'Reilly hypocritic
verbal diarrhea?
Peter Franks
Can you prove your "obvious bias"? If not, then you have fallen in
exactly the same hole that you are complaining about.
lorad
> It's that time of year again: O'Reilly recruits Stossel to 'investigate' the
> 'War on Christmas'
> By David Neiwert Wednesday Dec 09, 2009 6:00pm
> Bill O'Reilly decided to bring in Fox's newest big-name hire, John Stossel,
> to help buck up his annual pledge drive in the War on Christmas.
>
> Namely, he was citing as somehow authoritative ("I trust the folks") an
> online poll from an outfit called "StandForChristmas.com". Stossel briefly
> mentions that it actually was run by another group, and O'Reilly talks over
> him and emphasizes that it's "StandForChristmas."
>
> Of course, "StandForChristmas" is actually run by the religious-right cranks
> at James Dobson's Focus on the Family. So there's an obvious bias built into
> the poll and its potential viewers in the first place. And then to treat the
> results of any open online poll as meaningful in any real sense is just
> palpable nonsense.
Christmas is indeed under attack.. and has been under attack by non-
christian religions (infidels) and atheists for about 20 years.
Peter Franks
I guess you can't.
AnAmericanCitizen
Have either of you ever asked yourself why Bill O'Reilly has the most-watched news
show on cable? No? Then you must agree that the millions of his fans know what
they're doing when they set aside an hour every night to tune him in.
Incidentally, I like John Stossel...I don't recall seeing him before O'Reilly had him
on.
Merry Christmas....AAC
RD (The Sandman)
news:da65i5p4k11aigss9...@4ax.com:
He was on ABC's 20/20 with Friday night segments.
--
Sleep well tonight,
RD (The Sandman)
Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
What could possibly go wrong?
spammer
wrote:
> In article <da65i5p4k11aigss93efsqhp905v2i9...@4ax.com>,
>
> AnAmericanCitizen <NoAmne...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > Have either of you ever asked yourself why Bill O'Reilly has the most-watched
> > news
>
>
> > show on cable? No? Then you must agree that the millions of his fans know
> > what
> > they're doing when they set aside an hour every night to tune him in.
>
>
Funny how the people who don't watch O'Reilly have the most to
say about him. As the above idiot.
RD (The Sandman)
news:chine.bleu-C37C0...@nothing.attdns.com:
> In article <da65i5p4k11aigss9...@4ax.com>,
> AnAmericanCitizen <NoAm...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> Have either of you ever asked yourself why Bill O'Reilly has the
>> most-watched news
>
> No.
Which is typical of most who bad mouth him.
>> show on cable? No? Then you must agree that the millions of his
>> fans know what
>> they're doing when they set aside an hour every night to tune him in.
>
> I don't watch American Idol either.
>
--
AnAmericanCitizen
<rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>RD (The Sandman)
>
>Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
>a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't understand
>it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a president who
>hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury chief who didn't
>pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax, overseen by an obese
>Surgeon General and financed by a country that's nearly broke.
>What could possibly go wrong?
I like this. Mind if I plagiarize it for my own use? (Not that I won't anyway)...AAC
DamOTclese
>news:chine.bleu-C37C0...@nothing.attdns.com:
>> In article <da65i5p4k11aigss9...@4ax.com>,
>> AnAmericanCitizen <NoAm...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>> Have either of you ever asked yourself why Bill O'Reilly has the
>>> most-watched news
>> No.
> Which is typical of most who bad mouth him.
It's obviously why rightards watch and believe him: There's a rightard
born every minute. The low IQ of Republicans makes certain that there
is always a ready pool of retards who will believe Christanic treason.
---
10-year-old boy rejects Republicanism: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbfs0EVsHbs
Does belief in astrology cause insanity? http://www.skeptictank.org/edm.htm
"They love them some god-fearin' dipshits, don't they?" -- SittingDuck
RD (The Sandman)
news:c7e8i55k4k7hpimkg...@4ax.com:
It is not original with me. It is a paraphrase of an Email shown on
Huckabee. I stole what I remembered of it from there. Help yourself.
--
Sleep well tonight,
RD (The Sandman)
> In article <Xns9CDF77601...@216.196.97.130>,
> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Doppler China Blue Shift <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>> news:chine.bleu-C37C0...@nothing.attdns.com:
>>
>> > In article <da65i5p4k11aigss9...@4ax.com>,
>> > AnAmericanCitizen <NoAm...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Have either of you ever asked yourself why Bill O'Reilly has the
>> >> most-watched news
>> >
>> > No.
>>
>> Which is typical of most who bad mouth him.
>
> Do I?
>
Do you what?
Lookout
<rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>AnAmericanCitizen <NoAm...@earthlink.net> wrote in
>news:c7e8i55k4k7hpimkg...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:44:08 -0600, "RD (The Sandman)"
>> <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>RD (The Sandman)
>>>
>>>Let's see if I have this healthcare thingy right. Congress is to pass
>>>a plan written by a committee whose head has said he doesn't
>>>understand it, passed by a Congress that hasn't read it, signed by a
>>>president who hasn't read it, with funding administered by a Treasury
>>>chief who didn't pay his taxes because he didn't understand TurboTax,
>>>overseen by an obese Surgeon General and financed by a country that's
>>>nearly broke. What could possibly go wrong?
>>
>> I like this. Mind if I plagiarize it for my own use? (Not that I
>> won't anyway)...AAC
>>
>
>It is not original with me. It is a paraphrase of an Email shown on
>Huckabee. I stole what I remembered of it from there. Help yourself.
Let's see you defend the war in Iraq.
Dumbass
AnAmericanCitizen
>"RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>>Doppler China Blue Shift <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>news:chine.bleu-C37C0...@nothing.attdns.com:
>>> In article <da65i5p4k11aigss9...@4ax.com>,
>>> AnAmericanCitizen <NoAm...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>> Have either of you ever asked yourself why Bill O'Reilly has the
>>>> most-watched news
>>> No.
>> Which is typical of most who bad mouth him.
>
>It's obviously why rightards watch and believe him: There's a rightard
>born every minute. The low IQ of Republicans makes certain that there
>is always a ready pool of retards who will believe Christanic treason.
>
And this writer is questioning OUR IQ's?.....AAC
As an American, I am not so shocked that Obama was given the Nobel Peace
Prize without any accomplishments to his name, but that America gave him The
White House based on the same credentials." -- Newt Gingrich
tankfixer
mrLo...@yahoo.com says...
There's still a war in Iraq ?
I thought Dear Leader said he would end it ...
> Dumbass
you most likely are
Orton
It's part of the war on Christmas and obviously all the proof we need
that Godless Atheists are behind the big, one-world government
collectivist global warming conspiracy.
In fact, few know that decorated Christmas Trees were all throughout
the Holy Bible, and like Santa, his Elves and the 9 reindeer including
Dasher, Dancer, Prancer, Vixen, Comet, Cupid, Donner, Blitzen and
Rudolph are icons of the Christian faith and prayed to by millions of
Christians each and every Christmas.
To not have them included in the celebration of Christmas is an insult
to God and Jesus Christ himself.
DamOTclese
>On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:08:26 GMT, fr...@skeptictank.org (DamOTclese) wrote:
>>"RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>Doppler China Blue Shift <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote in
>>>news:chine.bleu-C37C0...@nothing.attdns.com:
>>>> In article <da65i5p4k11aigss9...@4ax.com>,
>>>> AnAmericanCitizen <NoAm...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>>> Have either of you ever asked yourself why Bill O'Reilly has the
>>>>> most-watched news
>>>> No.
>>> Which is typical of most who bad mouth him.
>>It's obviously why rightards watch and believe him: There's a rightard
>>born every minute. The low IQ of Republicans makes certain that there
>>is always a ready pool of retards who will believe Christanic treason.
>And this writer is questioning OUR IQ's?.....AAC
There i8s no question when it comes to rightard IQs thanks to Bush --
and wonderful idiots like yourself.
Democratic Teabagging Fag
<chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>In article <da65i5p4k11aigss9...@4ax.com>,
> AnAmericanCitizen <NoAm...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> Have either of you ever asked yourself why Bill O'Reilly has the most-watched
>> news
>
>No.
Why in the world did you chime in on a thread about Bill O'Reilly? We
won't ask if you won't tell us about your obsession with Bill
O'Reilly.
>
>> show on cable? No? Then you must agree that the millions of his fans know
>> what
>> they're doing when they set aside an hour every night to tune him in.
>
>I don't watch American Idol either.
Apples and Oranges. That's like saying Keith Olbermann and News
Journalism.
-
Teabagging is an erotic activity used within
the context of BDSM and male dominance, with
a dominant man teabagging his submissive
partner as one variation of facesitting and/or
as a means of inflicting erotic humiliation.
A favorite hobby amongst LIBERALS.