Why do Democrats hate Jews?
Spaz
current effort against the terrorists? Why are liberal news media stations and papers reporting the
current middle east crisis with an anti-Israel bias? Why are high profile liberal university
professors and other liberal groups speaking out against Israel with remarks full of anger and hate?
Why are they publically giving verbal support to the terrorists and to those who support the
terrorists?
medeziner
"Spaz" <y...@right.com> wrote in message
news:rpydnauMv7aJ2l3Z...@comcast.com...
Joseph Welch
> Why have Democrats become anti-Semitic?
They aren't. Why would you claim that they are?
> Why are Democratic politicians not supporting Israel in its current effort
> against the terrorists?
They are. Why would you claim otherwise?
And when did Israel become a religion?
Explain.
--
George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their influence wider,
their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S. and other
western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his authority and
violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United States
Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by underminig American
freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of government.
Supporting Bush is treason.
***************
JW
***************
"You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have
you left no sense of decency?"
http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
Joseph Welch
"medeziner" <mede...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:GM2dnUfs55Qw2l3Z...@comcast.com...
> Because the Jews have GOD on there side
Do they?
> and Democrats have to HATE that!
Why? Explain what you mean.
medeziner
"Joseph Welch" <seattled...@freewebspace.com> wrote in message
news:YvYvg.4403$Ji5....@fe05.buzzardnews.com...
Jim E
"Joseph Welch" <seattled...@freewebspace.com> wrote in message
news:YvYvg.4403$Ji5....@fe05.buzzardnews.com...
>
> news:GM2dnUfs55Qw2l3Z...@comcast.com...
>
>> Because the Jews have GOD on there side
>
> Do they?
>
>> and Democrats have to HATE that!
>
> Why? Explain what you mean.
> --
This " Why explain" shit is lame.
Jim E
Global_Warming @Peacemail.com
Jim E wrote:
> This " Why explain" shit is lame.
>
> Jim E
Jim E, depraved example of Republican Degeneracy
Jim E, foul-mouthed depraved republican. Here's his record kept by
Google about his disgusting republican degenerate thoughts and desires:
http://snipurl.com/tdcg
Results 1 - 100 of 151 for author:YD651...@sea.edu homo |
homosexual | Anal | screw | Fuck | fucking
These are all messages posted BY YOU, not the ones ABOUT YOU posted by
your net-pals, and below are the ones with your internet buddies
discussing you. ... thousands upon thousands of them.
http://snipurl.com/tdco
Results 1 - 100 of 5,470 for "Jim E" homo | homosexual | Anal | screw |
Fuck | fucking
Tsk, tsk, such language, such depravity. Yes, you have obtained 100%
brain rot.
Republicans Hate America
ISRAEL HAS THE RIGHT TO DEFEND ITSELF
LEBANON'S REFUGEES GROWING TO 1,000,000
Whenever anyone dares to criticize Israel they're automatically
branded Anti-Jew or Anti-Semite; that's a ploy to discredit legitimate
criticism.
I'm so sick and tired of hearing this pat answer "Israel has the right
to defend itself." to anyone who would dare criticize Israel in
overreacting in its defense by destroying Lebanon.
Of course Israel has the right to defend itself but that doesn't give
it the right to destroy a whole country in the process.
When Israel defends itself it's revenge with a vengeance (Collective
Punishment Israel's trademark) contravening the Geneva Convention (War
Crimes committed by Israel)
Anybody can play the blame game. It doesn't matter who started this
war destroying Lebanon for the action of a few won't solve anything
except provoke even more hatred and I might dare add growing support
for Hezbollah not less.
Almost from the beginning, Israel's new war in Lebanon has been
crossing legal and political red lines that will further destabilize
the Middle East.
Already, more than 300 Lebanese civilians have been killed by Israeli
military strikes. With little justification, Israel has bombed densely
populated urban neighborhoods and targeted the Beirut airport, roads
and bridges, ports, and the country's main power plant.
So now not even the Red Cross can deliver Humanitarian Aid to the
newly 500,000 Lebanese Refugees in their own country and counting to
at least a Million soon.
The Geneva Conventions of 1949 and the 1998 Statute of Rome set the
bar for how the world must manage armed conflicts. The most important
priority is the protection of civilians.
Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention absolutely prohibits the
"collective punishment (Israel's Trademark)" of a population for the
deeds of its government or an armed group. Article 147 forbids
"extensive destruction ... not justified by military necessity and
carried out unlawfully and wantonly."
The Rome Statute defines a war crime as, "intentionally directing
attacks against the civilian population or against individual
civilians not taking direct part in hostilities" (Article 8(2)).
Israel, by acting so fiercely and disproportionately, is repeating its
disregard for legal boundaries that characterized its 18-year
occupation in Lebanon that ended in 2000.
Hezbollah, acting as an armed militia beyond the reach of the Lebanese
state, bears its own responsibility for provoking the conflict and for
its decision to retaliate against innocent Israelis.
Hezbollah doesn't represent Lebanon which can't disarm this minority
because it would have reignited a civil war like they've known in the
last one which lasted 15 years.
Joseph Welch
>I would explain it to you sir but I don't speak IDIOT!
It's pretty fucking obvious that is EXACTLY what you speak, you fucking
coward.
Joseph Welch
"Jim E" <YD65...@sea.edu> wrote in message
news:4ib4nqF...@individual.net...
> This " Why explain" shit is lame.
Yes, I know how much you unAmerican right-wingers hate it when someone asks
you to back up your bullshit lies.
Tough shit.
Spaz
>I would explain it to you sir but I don't speak IDIOT!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Mind if I borrow that line sometime?
Ben Cramer
"Spaz" <y...@right.com> wrote in message
news:rpydnauMv7aJ2l3Z...@comcast.com...
XTS
It's not bias or even complicated. It's simply a matter of right v wrong.
There are plenty of democrats & liberlas who support Israel all the way.
However, the fact is no one or no nation can be right 100% of the time. One
has to have the ability to see the conflict through unbiased eyes. Israel
is not right all the time. America is not right all the time.
The philosophy of Ameica/Israel right or wrong is the epitome of biased
thinking. So, it is you who demonstrates the bias because you can only see
one side of a coin, when there are always two. During the times when you
are wrong, the only mature thing to do is admit you are wrong.
Sadly, for the world at large, neo-conservatives and 100% Israel backers do
not have the mature capacity to admit a mistake. You keep ramming your head
into the same tree and wonder why others do not do the same thing.
Spaz
>
> It's not bias or even complicated. It's simply a matter of right v wrong.
> There are plenty of democrats & liberlas who support Israel all the way.
> However, the fact is no one or no nation can be right 100% of the time. One
> has to have the ability to see the conflict through unbiased eyes. Israel
> is not right all the time. America is not right all the time.
>
> The philosophy of Ameica/Israel right or wrong is the epitome of biased
> thinking. So, it is you who demonstrates the bias because you can only see
> one side of a coin, when there are always two. During the times when you
> are wrong, the only mature thing to do is admit you are wrong.
>
> Sadly, for the world at large, neo-conservatives and 100% Israel backers do
> not have the mature capacity to admit a mistake. You keep ramming your head
> into the same tree and wonder why others do not do the same thing.
So, you're trying to say that the terrorists are right?
Bob
anti-Semites?
--
http://robertlindsay.blogspot.com/
Bob
Bob
Some of them are right, that is correct.
--
http://robertlindsay.blogspot.com/
Spaz
>
> Some of them are right, that is correct.
You support terrorism against the US and Israel?
XTS
I said you do not have the intellect to know the difference between right
and wrong.
You only know what right wing programing tells you.
One other thing, you don't really know what a terrorist is, who the
represent, or why, if your administration is involved in a global war on
terror, the USA has had wide open borders during this so called GWOT. None
of your kind knows what the hell is going on. You only knmow what the
radical right wing tells you.
I could go on about the Afghan/Paki border that bush refuses to police, but
you would not understand.
You may have the last word, and have a good day.
HillaryForPresident
Spaz wrote:
Mainly it's the fact that Israel defends itself with heavy weapons and
machinery, which appeals to Republicans more than to democracts who are
more peace-loving and think of poor civilians and such. Liberals don't
like the use of high-priced weapons that kill, even for seemingly valid
reasons such as defending your homeland (theoretically). Conservatives
like to bash, bash and bash their way to dominance and a feeling of
safely, which is Israel's method.
Interestingly, Republicans and Israelis are like this for different
reasons. For Israelis, they are trying to preserve their fortress, in
case of another holocaust arising. Republicans, particularly after
9-11, are trying to preserve their big corporations against terrorists
that might try to take down their warehouses and big buildings
(capital).
IMHO
Bob
Depends what you mean by terrorism.
I do support "terrorism" against valid Israeli military targets, of
course. That includes all adult settlers in settlements.
As an American, I can't really support any attacks on US forces. That
said, the Iraqis of course have a right to resist the colonization of
their land, including attacks on US colonial troops. I do support
attacks on the foreign, including US, corporations that are colonizing
Iraq.
I did support the attack on the UN building in Baghdad, because the UN
is now an agent of US imperialism.
I actually support the US - NATO operation in Afghanistan.
--
http://robertlindsay.blogspot.com/
Spaz
>
> I do support "terrorism" against valid Israeli military targets, of course. That includes all
> adult settlers in settlements.
That's all I needed to know. THANKS!
C J Nelson
Joseph Welch wrote:
> "medeziner" <mede...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:GM2dnUfs55Qw2l3Z...@comcast.com...
>
> > Because the Jews have GOD on there side
>
That is because by and large Democrats hate GOD.
The proof of this is all over the place.
Truth hurts does it nt
>
Jim E
>
> "Jim E" <YD65...@sea.edu> wrote in message
> news:4ib4nqF...@individual.net...
>
>> This " Why explain" shit is lame.
>
> Yes, I know how much you unAmerican right-wingers hate it when someone
> asks you to back up your bullshit lies.
>
> Tough shit.
No, I just hate pointless fishing expeditions from loons with no point to
make.
Jim E
JAMES....@likeigiveafuck.com
Jim E wrote:
> > Yes, I know how much you unAmerican right-wingers hate it when someone
> > asks you to back up your bullshit lies.
> >
> > Tough shit.
>
>
>
> No, I just hate pointless fishing expeditions from loons with no point to
> make.
>
>
> Jim E
JIM E, cold-blooded psychopathic murder lets guys with crewcuts and
decorations on their shoulders or hats tell him wanton murder is cool.
BABY-KILLER JIM E of the Airborne Calvary in Nam.
governorswill
>Sadly, for the world at large, neo-conservatives and 100% Israel backers do
>not have the mature capacity to admit a mistake. You keep ramming your head
>into the same tree and wonder why others do not do the same thing.
It's a war between the United States and Iran. Israel just happens to
be our primary base in the region. That's worth a lot of money.
Swill
--
Scripture of the Day!
Matthew 5: 11)"Blessed are you when people insult you.
persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against
you because of me.
12)Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward
in heaven, for in the same way they prescuted
the prophets who were before you."
-- The Living Insights Study Bible, NIV, Zonderman
governorswill
>> You support terrorism against the US and Israel?
>
>Depends what you mean by terrorism.
>
>I do support "terrorism" against valid Israeli military targets, of
>course. That includes all adult settlers in settlements.
I don't support terrorism at all. My answer to his question would
have been simply, "No."
But that doesn't prevent me from being able to see where both sides
are coming from and consider solutions that don't require killing off
our own species.
governorswill
<jgr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Mainly it's the fact that Israel defends itself with heavy weapons and
>machinery, which appeals to Republicans more than to democracts who are
>more peace-loving and think of poor civilians and such. Liberals don't
>like the use of high-priced weapons that kill, even for seemingly valid
>reasons such as defending your homeland (theoretically). Conservatives
>like to bash, bash and bash their way to dominance and a feeling of
>safely, which is Israel's method.
It's called, "The bravery of being out of range."
Ben Cramer
"Bob" <b...@bob.org> wrote in message news:5ocbo.t...@news.alt.net...
Totally agree with your stance, Bob, but am concerned that Afghanistan is
about go go pear-shaped.
Ben Cramer
"governorswill" <govern...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:gcm3c2997qd42be1i...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:02:35 GMT, "XTS" <X...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
>
>>Sadly, for the world at large, neo-conservatives and 100% Israel backers
>>do
>>not have the mature capacity to admit a mistake. You keep ramming your
>>head
>>into the same tree and wonder why others do not do the same thing.
>
> It's a war between the United States and Iran. Israel just happens to
> be our primary base in the region. That's worth a lot of money.
Take on Iran, and kiss you arse goodbye.
The yanks have never won a war in their lives, and if you think you can take
on Iran and win, you're dreaming.
Ben Cramer
"Starkiller©" <NoSpam.S...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:j3b4c2dlli5med8cd...@4ax.com...
And the yanks won that all on their own? Get real.
Ben Cramer
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 00:00:30 +1000, "Ben Cramer"
> <[remove]bencr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Starkiller©" <NoSpam.S...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:j3b4c2dlli5med8cd...@4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 20:50:23 +1000, "Ben Cramer"
>>> <[remove]bencr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"governorswill" <govern...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:gcm3c2997qd42be1i...@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:02:35 GMT, "XTS" <X...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Sadly, for the world at large, neo-conservatives and 100% Israel
>>>>>>backers
>>>>>>do
>>>>>>not have the mature capacity to admit a mistake. You keep ramming your
>>>>>>head
>>>>>>into the same tree and wonder why others do not do the same thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's a war between the United States and Iran. Israel just happens to
>>>>> be our primary base in the region. That's worth a lot of money.
>>>>
>>>>Take on Iran, and kiss you arse goodbye.
>>>>
>>>>The yanks have never won a war in their lives, and if you think you can
>>>>take
>>>>on Iran and win, you're dreaming.
>>>>
>>> Oh really? Ask the Japanese about that.
>>
>>And the yanks won that all on their own? Get real.
>>
>
> Just what exactly was the British involvement in the Pacific theater?
> Regards
Nothing to do with the original statement. The fact remains the yanks have
never won a war on their own. Ever.
Maxwell Edison
at NoSpam.S...@hotmail.com says...
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 00:00:30 +1000, "Ben Cramer"
> <[remove]bencr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Starkiller©" <NoSpam.S...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:j3b4c2dlli5med8cd...@4ax.com...
> >> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 20:50:23 +1000, "Ben Cramer"
> >> <[remove]bencr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>"governorswill" <govern...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> >>>news:gcm3c2997qd42be1i...@4ax.com...
> >>>> On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:02:35 GMT, "XTS" <X...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>Sadly, for the world at large, neo-conservatives and 100% Israel backers
> >>>>>do
> >>>>>not have the mature capacity to admit a mistake. You keep ramming your
> >>>>>head
> >>>>>into the same tree and wonder why others do not do the same thing.
> >>>>
> >>>> It's a war between the United States and Iran. Israel just happens to
> >>>> be our primary base in the region. That's worth a lot of money.
> >>>
> >>>Take on Iran, and kiss you arse goodbye.
> >>>
> >>>The yanks have never won a war in their lives, and if you think you can
> >>>take
> >>>on Iran and win, you're dreaming.
> >>>
> >> Oh really? Ask the Japanese about that.
> >
> >And the yanks won that all on their own? Get real.
> >
>
> Just what exactly was the British involvement in the Pacific theater?
> Regards
>
Can you say Russia, Australia and New Zealand?
--
"There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action." - Johann
Goethe
Spaz
news:e9tb1v$2muo$1...@otis.netspace.net.au...
>
> And the yanks won that all on their own? Get real.
No. They had help from a Jew named Einstein.
Spaz
>
> And they kicked Britains ass twice in a row and they never came back
> for more.
Jews help in those wars was critical as well.
governorswill
<[remove]bencr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>The yanks have never won a war in their lives, and if you think you can
>>>take
>>>on Iran and win, you're dreaming.
>>>
>> Oh really? Ask the Japanese about that.
>
>And the yanks won that all on their own? Get real.
Or the Spanish American war or the Mexican war or two wars against the
British Empire at it's height, one of them with no help at all.
governorswill
<NoSpam.S...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>And the yanks won that all on their own? Get real.
>>
>Someone else Nuke Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
>
>Just what exactly was the British involvement in the Pacific theater?
Indochina with the bulk of their forces working out of India and
Burma. The British Navy came in quite handy in the Indian Ocean as
well. The Australians also provided a great deal of support.
governorswill
Exactly what help did Jews provide in the American Revolution and the
War of 1812?
governorswill
So did the Germans and Japanese. The US just beat them to the punch
by a few months.
Spaz
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 08:35:39 -0700, "Spaz" <y...@right.com> wrote:
>
>
> Exactly what help did Jews provide in the American Revolution and the
> War of 1812?
Financing. I guess you didn't pay attention in history class, did you? Do your homework. If it
wasn't for Jewish financing, the USA wouldn't even exist. So, in all reality, Jews are the REAL
forefathers of America.
xpen...@earthlink.net
<NoSpam.S...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 00:00:30 +1000, "Ben Cramer"
><[remove]bencr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Starkiller©" <NoSpam.S...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:j3b4c2dlli5med8cd...@4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 20:50:23 +1000, "Ben Cramer"
>>> <[remove]bencr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"governorswill" <govern...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:gcm3c2997qd42be1i...@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:02:35 GMT, "XTS" <X...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Sadly, for the world at large, neo-conservatives and 100% Israel backers
>>>>>>do
>>>>>>not have the mature capacity to admit a mistake. You keep ramming your
>>>>>>head
>>>>>>into the same tree and wonder why others do not do the same thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's a war between the United States and Iran. Israel just happens to
>>>>> be our primary base in the region. That's worth a lot of money.
>>>>
>>>>Take on Iran, and kiss you arse goodbye.
>>>>
>>>>The yanks have never won a war in their lives, and if you think you can
>>>>take
>>>>on Iran and win, you're dreaming.
>>>>
>>> Oh really? Ask the Japanese about that.
>>
>>And the yanks won that all on their own? Get real.
>>
>Someone else Nuke Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
>
>Just what exactly was the British involvement in the Pacific theater?
Building a bridge on the river kwai!
>Regards
>
>
>Starkiller©
>
>......"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
> Hillary Clinton-2004
xpen...@earthlink.net
Huh? What battles?
xpen...@earthlink.net
<govern...@comcast.net> wrote:
>On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 08:35:39 -0700, "Spaz" <y...@right.com> wrote:
>
>>"Starkiller©" <NoSpam.S...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:1ig4c2ttl1hnvpgok...@4ax.com...
>>>
>>> And they kicked Britains ass twice in a row and they never came back
>>> for more.
>>
>>Jews help in those wars was critical as well.
>
>Exactly what help did Jews provide in the American Revolution and the
>War of 1812?
I remember A Paul Harvey "Now You Know the Rest of the Story" that
dealt with Jewish funding of the American Revolution.
>
>Swill
Gary Renzetti
"Spaz" <y...@right.com> wrote in message
news:ctqdneavf5Vc5V3Z...@comcast.com...> news:Hr2dnahveeeby13Z...@comcast.com...
>>I would explain it to you sir but I don't speak IDIOT!
>
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Mind if I borrow that line sometime?
Why would you need to? Everything you type is moronic.
>
Gary Renzetti
"Global_Warming @Peacemail.com" <Global_...@Peacemail.com> wrote in
message news:1153460646.1...@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Jim E wrote:
>
>> This " Why explain" shit is lame.
>>
>
> Jim E, depraved example of Republican Degeneracy
>
> Jim E, foul-mouthed depraved republican. Here's his record kept by
> Google about his disgusting republican degenerate thoughts and desires:
think anything through to its' ultimate conclusion. They look short-term
without seeing what's down the road.
>
>
> http://snipurl.com/tdcg
> Results 1 - 100 of 151 for author:YD651...@sea.edu homo |
> homosexual | Anal | screw | Fuck | fucking
>
> These are all messages posted BY YOU, not the ones ABOUT YOU posted by
> your net-pals, and below are the ones with your internet buddies
> discussing you. ... thousands upon thousands of them.
>
> http://snipurl.com/tdco
> Results 1 - 100 of 5,470 for "Jim E" homo | homosexual | Anal | screw |
> Fuck | fucking
>
> Tsk, tsk, such language, such depravity. Yes, you have obtained 100%
> brain rot.
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 15339 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try SPAMfighter for free now!
Ben Cramer
>
> Bottom line is who cares?
>
> Just because the US has, in recent history, sought the cooperation of
> the international community , it does not mean that it isn't capable
> of taking care of itself.
> The argument can also be reversed. What would Australia, or New
> Zealand have done to the Japanese Imperial fleet without the US
> involvement?
> How well would Great Britain have fared in WW2 without US involvement?
> Where would France, Italy, etc. etc. have been with no US involvement
> in WW1 or WW2?
>
> It's a pissant argument presented by a half assed troll.
> May as well be saying that in Desert Storm it was the Spanish that
> were doing all the work for the US. A dumbass argument.
Nope. The fucking yanks have never won a war, on their own.
Ben Cramer
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 01:04:45 +1000, "Ben Cramer"
> Japanese surrender. Don't recall any other nations having shit to do
> with it.
>
> And they kicked Britains ass twice in a row and they never came back
> for more.
>
> Get a new gimmick.
> The my country is better than yours prod is pretty lame.
I don't use that, you twat. Just like to point out the yanks uselessness
when it comes to fighting wars on their own.
How'd ya go in Mogadishu?
Gary Renzetti
"Joseph Welch" <seattled...@freewebspace.com> wrote in message
news:NWZvg.4424$Ji5....@fe05.buzzardnews.com...
>
> "Jim E" <YD65...@sea.edu> wrote in message
> news:4ib4nqF...@individual.net...
>
>> This " Why explain" shit is lame.
>
> asks you to back up your bullshit lies.
>
> Tough shit.
>
> --
> George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their influence wider,
> their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S. and other
> western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his authority and
> violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United States
> Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by underminig
> American freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of
> government. Supporting Bush is treason.
>
> ***************
> JW
> ***************
> "You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last?
> Have you left no sense of decency?"
> http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
Yeah. And this chimp carries on while Clinton was impeached for getting a
bj!
Go figure...
Gary Renzetti
"C J Nelson" <claren...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1153534128....@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...>> news:GM2dnUfs55Qw2l3Z...@comcast.com...
>>
>> > Because the Jews have GOD on there side
>>
>> > and Democrats have to HATE that!
>
> That is because by and large Democrats hate GOD.
>
> The proof of this is all over the place.
>
> Truth hurts does it nt
>>
What "god"® might this be? Yahweh? Baal? Jehovah? Thor? Odin? Osiris? Zeus?
Jupiter? Wicca?
Strangely, I've ever seen a notarized, signed mandate from *any* of the
above, and without any proof of a supreme diety's dominance, I daresay that
your'e all equally full of poop.
Got some documentation?
Let's see it!
Gary Renzetti
>
>> Why have Democrats become anti-Semitic®?
>
> They aren't. Why would you claim that they are?
>
>> Why are Democratic politicians not supporting Israel® in its current
>> effort against the terrorists?
>
> They are. Why would you claim otherwise?
>
> And when did Israel® become a religion?
>
> Explain.
>
> --
> George W. Bush has made the terrorists stronger, their influence wider,
> their numbers larger, and their motivation to attack the U.S. and other
> western interests greater. He has repeatedly abused his authority and
> violated his Oath of Office by turning his back on the United States
> Constitution; thereby surrendering to the terrorists by underminig
> American freedoms,values, and the very foundations of our system of
> government. Supporting Bush is treason.
>
> ***************
> JW
> ***************
> "You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last?
> Have you left no sense of decency?"
> http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/welch-mccarthy.html
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Renzetti
"Republicans Hate America" <war...@whitehouse.evil> wrote in message
news:udq0c294b7a1g6ud9...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:16:35 -0700, "Spaz" <y...@right.com> wrote:
>
>>Why have Democrats become anti-Semitic®? Why are Democratic politicians
>>stations and papers reporting the
>>current middle east crisis with an anti-Israel® bias? Why are high
>>profile liberal university
>>professors and other liberal groups speaking out against Israel® with
>>remarks full of anger and hate?
>>Why are they publically giving verbal support to the terrorists and to
>>those who support the
>>terrorists?
>
> ISRAEL® HAS THE RIGHT TO DEFEND ITSELF
>
> LEBANON'S REFUGEES GROWING TO 1,000,000
>
> Whenever anyone dares to criticize Israel® they're automatically
> branded Anti-Jew® or Anti-Semite®; that's a ploy to discredit legitimate
> criticism.
>
> I'm so sick and tired of hearing this pat answer "Israel® has the right
> to defend itself." to anyone who would dare criticize Israel® in
> overreacting in its defense by destroying Lebanon.
>
> Of course Israel® has the right to defend itself but that doesn't give
> it the right to destroy a whole country in the process.
>
> When Israel® defends itself it's revenge with a vengeance (Collective
> Punishment Israel®'s trademark) contravening the Geneva Convention (War
> Crimes committed by Israel®)
>
> Anybody can play the blame game. It doesn't matter who started this
> war destroying Lebanon for the action of a few won't solve anything
> except provoke even more hatred and I might dare add growing support
> for Hezbollah not less.
>
> Almost from the beginning, Israel®'s new war in Lebanon has been
> crossing legal and political red lines that will further destabilize
> the Middle East.
>
> Already, more than 300 Lebanese civilians have been killed by Israeli®
> military strikes. With little justification, Israel® has bombed densely
> populated urban neighborhoods and targeted the Beirut airport, roads
> and bridges, ports, and the country's main power plant.
>
> So now not even the Red Cross can deliver Humanitarian Aid to the
> newly 500,000 Lebanese Refugees in their own country and counting to
> at least a Million soon.
>
> The Geneva Conventions of 1949 and the 1998 Statute of Rome set the
> bar for how the world must manage armed conflicts. The most important
> priority is the protection of civilians.
>
> Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention absolutely prohibits the
> "collective punishment (Israel®'s Trademark)" of a population for the
> deeds of its government or an armed group. Article 147 forbids
> "extensive destruction ... not justified by military necessity and
> carried out unlawfully and wantonly."
>
> The Rome Statute defines a war crime as, "intentionally directing
> attacks against the civilian population or against individual
> civilians not taking direct part in hostilities" (Article 8(2)).
>
> Israel®, by acting so fiercely and disproportionately, is repeating its
> disregard for legal boundaries that characterized its 18-year
> occupation in Lebanon that ended in 2000.
>
> Hezbollah, acting as an armed militia beyond the reach of the Lebanese
> state, bears its own responsibility for provoking the conflict and for
> its decision to retaliate against innocent Israelis®.
>
> Hezbollah doesn't represent Lebanon which can't disarm this minority
> because it would have reignited a civil war like they've known in the
> last one which lasted 15 years.
Bottom line is that "Isr-elis"® don't give a shit *who* dies, or how
horribly, as long as they aren't sheenies.
Gary Renzetti
"XTS" <X...@woh.rr.com> wrote in message
news:Mqcwg.55875$Eh1....@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...> news:UpqdnWDttZavqVzZ...@comcast.com...
>> "XTS" <X...@woh.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:fx9wg.55865$Eh1....@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
>> >
>> > It's not bias or even complicated. It's simply a matter of right v
> wrong.
>> > There are plenty of democrats & liberlas who support Israel all the
>> > way.
>> > However, the fact is no one or no nation can be right 100% of the time.
> One
>> > has to have the ability to see the conflict through unbiased eyes.
> Israel
>> > is not right all the time. America is not right all the time.
>> >
>> > The philosophy of Ameica/Israel right or wrong is the epitome of biased
>> > thinking. So, it is you who demonstrates the bias because you can only
> see
>> > one side of a coin, when there are always two. During the times when
> you
>> > are wrong, the only mature thing to do is admit you are wrong.
>> >
>> > Sadly, for the world at large, neo-conservatives and 100% Israel
>> > backers
> do
>> > not have the mature capacity to admit a mistake. You keep ramming your
> head
>> > into the same tree and wonder why others do not do the same thing.
>>
Don't know. But their method of fighting may just be because it's all that's
available, and not because their cause is unjust
>>
>>
> No.
>
> I said you do not have the intellect to know the difference between right
> and wrong.
> You only know what right wing programing tells you.
>
> One other thing, you don't really know what a terrorist® is, who the
> represent, or why, if your administration is involved in a global war on
> terror, the USA has had wide open borders during this so called GWOT. None
> of your kind knows what the hell is going on. You only knmow what the
> radical right wing tells you.
>
> I could go on about the Afghan/Paki border that bush refuses to police,
> but
> you would not understand.
>
> You may have the last word, and have a good day.
>
A "terrorist®" is a person who has a bomb and a cause, but lacks an air
force. Usually this "terrorist"® is someone else's "freedom fighter"®.
Gary Renzetti
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 00:00:30 +1000, "Ben Cramer"
> <[remove]bencr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Starkiller©" <NoSpam.S...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:j3b4c2dlli5med8cd...@4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 20:50:23 +1000, "Ben Cramer"
>>> <[remove]bencr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"governorswill" <govern...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:gcm3c2997qd42be1i...@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:02:35 GMT, "XTS" <X...@woh.rr.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Sadly, for the world at large, neo-conservatives and 100% Israel
>>>>>>backers
>>>>>>do
>>>>>>not have the mature capacity to admit a mistake. You keep ramming your
>>>>>>head
>>>>>>into the same tree and wonder why others do not do the same thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's a war between the United States and Iran. Israel just happens to
>>>>> be our primary base in the region. That's worth a lot of money.
>>>>
>>>>Take on Iran, and kiss you arse goodbye.
>>>>
>>>>The yanks have never won a war in their lives, and if you think you can
>>>>take
>>>>on Iran and win, you're dreaming.
>>>>
>>> Oh really? Ask the Japanese about that.
>>
>>And the yanks won that all on their own? Get real.
>>
>
> Just what exactly was the British involvement in the Pacific theater?
> Regards
>
>
And Australia's? And China's?
Yeah, the Yanks would have won on thier own, granted. But by the time they
nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan was licked anyway. They were right to do
it, imo, but it had sfa to do with winning the Pacific war.
>
> ......"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common
> good."
> Hillary Clinton-2004
Gary Renzetti
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 01:04:45 +1000, "Ben Cramer"
> Japanese surrender. Don't recall any other nations having shit to do
> with it.
>
> And they kicked Britains ass twice in a row and they never came back
> for more.
>
> BTW. Your troll skills suck really bad.
> Get a new gimmick.
> The my country is better than yours prod is pretty lame.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Starkiller©
Well, they didn't do so great in the war of 1812, now did they?
Gary Renzetti
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 08:35:39 -0700, "Spaz" <y...@right.com> wrote:
>
>>"Starkiller©" <NoSpam.S...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:1ig4c2ttl1hnvpgok...@4ax.com...
>>>
>>> And they kicked Britains ass twice in a row and they never came back
>>> for more.
>>
>>Jews help in those wars was critical as well.
>
> Exactly what help did Jews provide in the American Revolution and the
> War of 1812?
>
> Swill
Gary Renzetti
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 15:14:30 GMT, Maxwell Edison
> <M...@goawayspammers.org> wrote:
>
>
> Bottom line is who cares?
>
> Just because the US has, in recent history, sought the cooperation of
> the international community , it does not mean that it isn't capable
> of taking care of itself.
> The argument can also be reversed. What would Australia, or New
> Zealand have done to the Japanese Imperial fleet without the US
> involvement?
> How well would Great Britain have fared in WW2 without US involvement?
> Where would France, Italy, etc. etc. have been with no US involvement
> in WW1 or WW2?
>
> It's a pissant argument presented by a half assed troll.
> May as well be saying that in Desert Storm it was the Spanish that
> were doing all the work for the US. A dumbass argument.
>
> Revolutionary War, War of 1812 and Spanish American and Philippine
> American wars were all won by the US alone. There are quite a few
> other smaller conflicts such as Grenada that were also US victories
> alone.
>
Uhhh. The Excited States didn't win the war of 1812...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Starkiller©
Gary Renzetti
Spaz
>
> I remember A Paul Harvey "Now You Know the Rest of the Story" that
> dealt with Jewish funding of the American Revolution.
VERY GOOD! Do you remember the name of one of the most prominent financiers? I'll give you a hint.
The US Government made a postal stamp in his honor in 1975 calling him the "financial hero" of the
Revolutionary War.
torresD
Republicans Hate America
<liz...@connection.com> wrote:
>Bottom line is that "Isr-elis"® don't give a shit *who* dies, or how
>horribly, as long as they aren't sheenies.
What does sheenies mean?
Tobacco Spittin' Gun Slingin' KKK Deer Huntin' Jesus
Gary Renzetti wrote:
The Reverend
It's a nice word for "jews".
HTH
HAND
Ed
"Republicans Hate America" <war...@whitehouse.evil> wrote in message
That's neo-nazi slang for "jews."
Gary Renzetti is one of the NG's leading bigots, who wishes not just
Israeli, but ALL jews would just disappear. Talk about an exercise in
futility.
>
mand...@verizon.net
Spaz wrote:
> Why have Democrats become anti-Semitic? Why are Democratic politicians not supporting Israel in its
> current effort against the terrorists? Why are liberal news media stations and papers reporting the
> current middle east crisis with an anti-Israel bias? Why are high profile liberal university
> professors and other liberal groups speaking out against Israel with remarks full of anger and hate?
> Why are they publically giving verbal support to the terrorists and to those who support the
> terrorists?
I need a new party sooooooooo badly.
Lisa
DoD
<mand...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:1155344027.9...@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
You will have to form your own. The ones we have right now, neither of them
make any sense.
2006wells
become virulent anti-Semites. They have sided with the Islamic-fascists
because they see them as the enemies of the US and Israel. The biggest sin
you can commit on campus these days is to defend the existence of the Jewish
state. I made that mistake once and made an enemy of the Afro-American Dean.
It seems nobody hates Jews more than Afro-Americans.
<mand...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:1155344027.9...@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>