Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Leftards defend Nixon
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Dänk 42Ø
May 17, 2013, 2:31:23 PM5/17/13
to
Oops. Did I say Nixon? I meant Obama. As scandal after scandal
unfolds, I hear leftards "defending" Chairman Obama's corruption on the
grounds that Emperor Bush was corrupt, too.
I do not deny that George W. Bush was corrupt, which is why I voted for
Democraps in 2006 in the deluded beLIEf they would impeach the fucker.
Two years later I did not vote for Barack Hussein Obama or Democraps
because I knew they were frauds and criminals just like Bush and the
Republicans.
We are now in the fifth year of Chairman Obama's reign, and screaming
"Bush! Bush! Bush!" no longer works. Even Stalin's court jester, Jon
Stewart, is turning on his messiah. (Rachel Bladdow's mouth is still
wrapped around his penis, though.)
It is true that Republicans are exploiting the scandals for political
gain, and why shouldn't they? This is how politics work. Do leftards
want a system like Venezuela, with a dictator who suspends parliament and
rules by decree until the country runs out of food and toilet paper?
Progress!
.
.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
"Napoleon, with the dogs following him, now mounted onto the raised
portion of the floor where Major had previously stood to deliver his
speech. He announced that from now on the Sunday-morning Meetings would
come to an end. They were unnecessary, he said, and wasted time. In
future all questions relating to the working of the farm would be settled
by a special committee of pigs, presided over by himself."
-- Animal Farm
unfolds, I hear leftards "defending" Chairman Obama's corruption on the
grounds that Emperor Bush was corrupt, too.
I do not deny that George W. Bush was corrupt, which is why I voted for
Democraps in 2006 in the deluded beLIEf they would impeach the fucker.
Two years later I did not vote for Barack Hussein Obama or Democraps
because I knew they were frauds and criminals just like Bush and the
Republicans.
We are now in the fifth year of Chairman Obama's reign, and screaming
"Bush! Bush! Bush!" no longer works. Even Stalin's court jester, Jon
Stewart, is turning on his messiah. (Rachel Bladdow's mouth is still
wrapped around his penis, though.)
It is true that Republicans are exploiting the scandals for political
gain, and why shouldn't they? This is how politics work. Do leftards
want a system like Venezuela, with a dictator who suspends parliament and
rules by decree until the country runs out of food and toilet paper?
Progress!
.
.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
"Napoleon, with the dogs following him, now mounted onto the raised
portion of the floor where Major had previously stood to deliver his
speech. He announced that from now on the Sunday-morning Meetings would
come to an end. They were unnecessary, he said, and wasted time. In
future all questions relating to the working of the farm would be settled
by a special committee of pigs, presided over by himself."
-- Animal Farm
Zepp
May 17, 2013, 3:31:42 PM5/17/13
to
On Fri, 17 May 2013 13:31:23 -0500, Dänk 42Ø wrote:
> Oops. Did I say Nixon? I meant Obama. As scandal after scandal
> unfolds, I hear leftards "defending" Chairman Obama's corruption on the
> grounds that Emperor Bush was corrupt, too.
I hear Satanists telling me that nine out of ten support Sarah Palin for
> Oops. Did I say Nixon? I meant Obama. As scandal after scandal
> unfolds, I hear leftards "defending" Chairman Obama's corruption on the
> grounds that Emperor Bush was corrupt, too.
president.
Look! It's a real anecdote! You trust real anecdotes, don't you?
Dänk 42Ø
May 18, 2013, 1:56:03 AM5/18/13
to
On Fri, 17 May 2013 19:31:42 +0000, quack:
> On Fri, 17 May 2013 13:31:23 -0500, Dänk 42Ø wrote:
>
>> Oops. Did I say Nixon? I meant Obama. As scandal after scandal
>> unfolds, I hear leftards "defending" Chairman Obama's corruption on the
>> grounds that Emperor Bush was corrupt, too.
>
> I hear Satanists telling me that nine out of ten support Sarah Palin for
> president.
>
> Look! It's a real anecdote! You trust real anecdotes, don't you?
Maybe I should post the same words to "Readersupportednews" then quote
them here, THEN you'll believe it!
Tell us why we are supposed to believe any of your noxious opinion?. You
never provide any evidence to support them, and reject any evidence that
contradicts them as having been forged. Why are my opinions "anecdotes"
but not yours?
Looking at the last few weeks of your posts, your tongue seems to be
firmly lodged in Chairman Obama's sphincter, defending him against
scandals that you would have demanded Emperor Bush's head on a platter
for had he been implicated in them.
In other words, you are a hypocrite, just a pathetic leftard who speaks
loudly but doesn't really stand for anything at all. Noise is hardly a
virtue.
Dipshit.
> On Fri, 17 May 2013 13:31:23 -0500, Dänk 42Ø wrote:
>
>> Oops. Did I say Nixon? I meant Obama. As scandal after scandal
>> unfolds, I hear leftards "defending" Chairman Obama's corruption on the
>> grounds that Emperor Bush was corrupt, too.
>
> I hear Satanists telling me that nine out of ten support Sarah Palin for
> president.
>
> Look! It's a real anecdote! You trust real anecdotes, don't you?
them here, THEN you'll believe it!
Tell us why we are supposed to believe any of your noxious opinion?. You
never provide any evidence to support them, and reject any evidence that
contradicts them as having been forged. Why are my opinions "anecdotes"
but not yours?
Looking at the last few weeks of your posts, your tongue seems to be
firmly lodged in Chairman Obama's sphincter, defending him against
scandals that you would have demanded Emperor Bush's head on a platter
for had he been implicated in them.
In other words, you are a hypocrite, just a pathetic leftard who speaks
loudly but doesn't really stand for anything at all. Noise is hardly a
virtue.
Dipshit.
0 new messages