Well, since you are a historian and writer, maybe you wont mind me going off
on a tangent ;-)
A puzzle you might fisd interesting.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.kibology/msg/c8af963e4234564d
Besides "new xo"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_executive
If you look at
KIBO
ADAM
The last wo letters of each name
BO
AM
Make an interesting construct
This article about a "September 10 mindset" is funny in that I wrote that
post on September 10
http://marathonpundit.blogspot.com/2008/06/mccain-campaign-obama-has-sept-10.html
Addressing the article, as I stated to Diana in 2002, there have been no
attacks because Osama used them all that day.Everyone else to follow have
been second stringers, new crews.Thats the main reason there hasnt been an
attack (I am not criticizing law enforcement, not at all, but the folloowing
is important)
Now, terrorism *is* a law enforcement issue*except for the prosecution of
combatants on a battlefield), because the militarization of the information
and the assembly of dossiers via national technical means is a dangerous
power to introduce to the body politic.As bad as this may sound, it is
actually a sound intelligence/law enforcement situation that had the
information that Able Danger collected about a terrorist in San Diego not
categorized and easily filed into a retrievable article for the police.If it
would have been-if, in fact, CIA information about a person in the US in a
retrievable form would have been the result of an unacceptable situation
where dangerous powers that were strictly prohibited-(the CIA was restricted
from operating on US soild for a very good reason.) would have been granted
to the law enforcement community.This is where the grey area that the
article is sitting on-where law enforcement and military meet.It is why DHS
was created.Some day I may write about the conversations we had about its
creation.(we meaning Department of Justice, NSA, Secret Service, military
branches-some of my fellow students would, through the couse of a couple
years at school together, end up sporting brand new shiny DHS e-mail addys
From my Myspace blog Ocotber 6 2007
Capt. Scott Phillpott, head of the Able Danger program, asks Lt. Col.
Anthony Shaffer to talk to a representative of CIA Director George Tenet and
attempt to convince him that the new Able Danger program is not competing
with the CIA. Shaffer later recalls the CIA representative replying, "I
clearly understand the difference. I clearly understand. We're going after
the leadership. You guys are going after the body. But, it doesn't matter.
The bottom line is, CIA will never give you the best information from 'Alex
Base' [the CIA's covert action element targeting bin Laden] or anywhere
else. CIA will never provide that to you because if you were successful in
your effort to target al-Qaeda, you will steal our thunder. Therefore, we
will not support this." Shaffer claims that for the duration of Able
Danger's existence, "To my knowledge, and my other colleagues' knowledge,
there was no information ever released to us because CIA chose not to
participate in Able Danger." [Government Security News, September 2005.')"
.."return nd()">Government Security News, 9/2005]
Entity Tags: George J. Tenet, Scott Phillpott, Anthony Shaffer, Able Danger,
Central Intelligence Agency
Timeline Tags: Complete 911 Timeline, 9/11 Timeline
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/entity.jsp?entity=able_danger
No the real reason is because the ACLU would have had the hide of anyone at
CIA having any knowledge whatsoever of dudes in USA (search for Able Danger,
San Diego 2000)Yeah there were turf wars, but this is criminal negligence if
one group knew and didnt tell.
Well, which is it?"Turf war" caused a massive criminal conspiracy and war
crime to unfold because someone might steal thunder, or the simple fact it
is not politically feasable to share such things?
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Ok, I havent addressed the Putin issue, but I have a question.
What successful prophecies are in the book?If it turns out Obama becomes
President, I would consider what the person wrote in 1926 to be an excellent
candidate for a real prophecy fulfilled.
Did you write the book?
According to theory, abuse of U.S. citizens would fall under the official
jurisdiction of the FBI, rather than the CIA. The responsibility
of the CIA would be for abuse of foreigners in strange countries,
such as for example to abduct persons on the streets of German cities.
I would agree that any distinction between "foreign" and "domestic"
terrorism would be artificial and counter-productive. Everything is
blurred together. Terrorism is an globalized as McDonalds or RJ Reynolds,
and almost as harmful to the health, so it is necessary for all intelligence and
law-enforcement organizations to have a global orientation.
However, anyone who thinks that the CIA has really been restricted
to abuse of citizens abroad is simply naive.
Tom Keske
Of course, when one is doing battle with "the Anti-Christ", one does
not worry about diplomacy, self-criticism, compromise, coexistence.
Those are the things of Girly Men, not true Christian Soldiers.
Vladimir Putin is the Evil Twin of Elmer Fudd. He is "Mr. Burns" from
the Simpsons cartoon. I have gazed deeply into his eyes.
He has the soul of a goldfish, who fancies himself to be a shark.
Tom Keske
"Leo Sgouros" <hanar...@archangels.mil> wrote in message news:g87lp0$qhh$1...@registered.motzarella.org...