American POW, Private Robert Bergdahl, can have his testicles *legally* crushed in a vice
I, Enemy Combatant
Shock, awe and nut-crushing have been accepted and legalized by the
Jews running my government.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
John Yoo gives Bush Legal Power to Crush children's testicles
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11488.htm
By Philip Watts
01/08/06 "revcom.us"
John Yoo publicly argued there is no law that could prevent the
President from ordering the torture of a child of a suspect in custody
� including by crushing that child�s testicles.
This came out in response to a question in a December 1st debate in
Chicago with Notre Dame professor and international human rights
scholar Doug Cassel.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ball Banger Obama wants suit against Yoo dismissed
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/12/07/BA061AVC89.DTL
The Obama administration has asked an appeals court to dismiss a
lawsuit accusing former Bush administration attorney John Yoo of
authorizing the torture of a terrorism suspect, saying federal law
does not allow damage claims against lawyers who advise the president
on national security issues.
Read more:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/12/07/BA061AVC89.DTL#ixzz0ZI2IGNV4
...
"Whenever I hear anyone arguing for torture, I feel a strong impulse
to see it tried on him personally."
-- Abraham Lincoln
"Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal."
--Martin Luther King, Jr.
Ian B MacLure
news:lpdaj5t9vlspkj43l...@4ax.com:
>
>
> Shock, awe and nut-crushing have been accepted and legalized by the
> Jews running my government.
>
> What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
Figures you'd say something like that.
Although how you get there from the waterboarding that 3 of the high
level al-Qaeda types were subjected to is beyond me.
Oh and lest I forget.
Fugginazi scum...
IBM
Bongblaster911
wrote:
Was there a question in there?
Was your question: How did my Jewish government go from civilized
water-boarding to barbaric nut-crushing?
FIRST:
My Jewish government created a new law making it legal to crush
children's testicles.
SECOND:
Hebrew CIA pigs kidnap Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's two sons.
THIRD:
WE HAVE A CONFESSION! WE HAVE A CONFESSION!
Khalid Mohammed ADMITTED TO BEING THE 9-11 MASTERMIND.
Too late though. He'll never be a grand-daddy :-(
======================================
John Yoo gives Bush Legal Power to Crush children's testicles
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11488.htm
By Philip Watts
01/08/06 "revcom.us"
John Yoo publicly argued there is no law that could prevent the
President from ordering the torture of a child of a suspect in custody
� including by crushing that child�s testicles.
This came out in response to a question in a December 1st debate in
Chicago with Notre Dame professor and international human rights
scholar Doug Cassel.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Do We Still Have Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's Sons?
by DC Dave
Finally, after having been held in U.S. CIA and military custody for
more than four years while being subjected to �all appropriate
pressure� by �interrogators� employing their �full range of
permissible techniques,� the former student at North Carolina�s Chowan
College and North Carolina A & T, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, has finally
claimed to have directed just about every major terrorism attack
against the United States over the past fifteen years. From the
techniques that we have read about, one has to wonder what took him so
long to start singing like a canary.
But little known to most Americans, no matter how closely they might
follow the news, the torture by whatever name one might choose to call
it, is not even the worst of it. According to a March 2003 report
that appeared in the Washington, DC, area only in the little-read
Washington Times, the United States government has his two young sons
in its custody . As reported by Olga Craig of the Sunday Telegraph of
London on March 9, 2003:
The boys [Yousef al-Khalid, 9, and his brother, Abed al-Khalid, 7]
have been held by the Pakistani authorities but�they were flown to
America where they will be questioned about their father. CIA
interrogators confirmed that the boys were staying at a secret address
where they were being encouraged to talk about their father's
activities. "We are handling them with kid gloves," said one official.
"After all, they are only little children, but we need to know as much
about their father's recent activities as possible. We have child
psychologists on hand at all times and they are given the best of
care."
To the knowledge of this writer, nothing further about Mohammed�s sons
has appeared in the news, so we may assume that that is where matters
stand. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed�s sons, who would now be 13 and 11,
have apparently been incarcerated somewhere in the United States for
four years now, and all that time they have been at the tender mercies
of the Central Intelligence Agency. Now there may still be some
innocents among us who will readily believe that the CIA has been
giving them nothing but �the best of care,� but that could hardly
include anyone with the imagination to put himself in Mohammed�s
place. These determined continued believers in the word of people who
have been caught in lies repeatedly might also swallow the assertion
that we nabbed these moppets to pump them for vital information, never
mind that this kidnapping flies in the face of everything that is
legal and decent and seems to be just another part of systematic U.S.
practice.
If our purpose was simply to question them about their father�s
activities, one might ask, why did we find it necessary to take them
into custody and to bring them to the United States? No, the lead
sentence in the Sunday Telegraph story says it all; the children �are
being used by the CIA to force their father to talk.� As an unnamed
CIA official is quoted, �His sons are important to him. The promise of
their release and their return to Pakistan may be the psychological
lever we need to break him."
He sure did take a lot longer than Nikolai Bukharin or Grigory
Zinoviev back in the late 1930s in Moscow, but now it looks like he
has pretty thoroughly broken and has confessed to everything that we
wanted him to, and more. Do you think we will soon be reading stories
in the mainstream media that his two precious ones have now been
allowed to return to their families, or will the incarcerators be as
true to their word as they have been in the case of
Palestinian-American professor, Sami Al-Arian?
Some Questions for the "Mastermind"
If he is, indeed, the 9-11 mastermind, I surely would like to ask him
a question or two. The first would be how on earth he was able to
persuade Osama and the boys that the plan would have any chance at all
to succeed. From the beginning, it depended upon complete ineptitude
on the part of America�s air defenses. Even though Tom Clancy, a man
who seems to be on the best of terms with the Pentagon crowd, had
already written two novels in which terrorists hijack airliners, Debt
of Honor, and Executive Orders, with the intent of crashing them into
important buildings, the very notion that someone would actually do it
was beyond our leaders� wildest imagination, we have been told.
Though the top U.S. bulb might be an exceptionally dim one, how does
one make grandiose plans that depend utterly upon such unimaginably
low wattage up and down the chain of command? Wouldn�t Mohammed have
to be more than a mastermind, but a master mindreader?
More than that, wouldn�t it even have required a degree of
clairvoyance that would surely have made the plan very hard to sell to
superiors? The hijackers would all have to be able to get through
security without their weapons being detected and those weapons would
have to be perceived as lethal enough to allow them to control the far
larger numbers of passengers and crew of the airplanes. What are the
chances, really, of so many people behaving so much like sheep?
�Sorry, Khalid,� I can hear Osama saying, �Go back to the drawing
board and come up with something a bit simpler that has a greater
likelihood of success,� and we haven�t even mentioned the need for
virtuoso piloting and navigating performances by novice pilots on
harrowing suicide missions.
If preserving our security were our real concern�and, indeed, if the
confession were real�we would be treated to a full explanation of how
this bunch of zealots pulled off their miraculous attack, but if I
were you I would not be holding my breath waiting for it.
David Martin, March 18, 2007
The Bird
The Bird Columns
DCDave's Homepage
DCDave's Column
newsgroup: alt.thebird
email: dcdav...@verizon.net