Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Emma West trial delayed for the third time
43 views
Skip to first unread message
RH
Sep 8, 2012, 3:39:37 PM9/8/12
to
Emma West trial delayed for the third time
Posted on September 8, 2012
Robert Henderson
The trial of Emma West on racially aggravated public order offences
has been delayed for the third time (
http://www.thisiscroydontoday.co.uk/Emma-West-trial-adjourned-time/story-16820636-detail/story.html
). No further date has been set. The trial was originally scheduled
for June, then July and finally September 5th. The ostensible reason
for the latest delay is the same as it was previously, further
psychiatric reports are being sought by the prosecution.
It is true that cases can be delayed several times for reasons which
are entirely legitimate. Further evidence directly relating to the
immediate facts of the case, that is, what happened rather than why
it happened, may be being sought with a reasonable chance of
success. Examples would be where witnesses have not been interviewed
because they are not in the country, but are believed to be returning
in the foreseeable future or documents are being withheld by a body
such as a bank and their release or otherwise is the subject of
ongoing court action. But there is nothing like that here, for the
delay is simply down to further psychiatric reports being wanted.
That is something largely within the control of those commissioning
them. The fact that it is the prosecution which is asking for more
reports is highly significant because it suggests that the ones they
have already commissioned are not to their liking, that is, they are
detrimental to the prosecution.
The case is not that complex. The prosecution have the recording.
They have had ample time to test it to see if it has been tampered
with. As the delay in trying the case is ascribed solely to the need
for psychiatric reports, presumably the prosecution either have
witness statements from the person who filmed the incident and
possibly others amongst the
Read more at http://englandcalling.wordpress.com/2012/09/08/emma-west-trial-delayed-for-the-third-time/
Posted on September 8, 2012
Robert Henderson
The trial of Emma West on racially aggravated public order offences
has been delayed for the third time (
http://www.thisiscroydontoday.co.uk/Emma-West-trial-adjourned-time/story-16820636-detail/story.html
). No further date has been set. The trial was originally scheduled
for June, then July and finally September 5th. The ostensible reason
for the latest delay is the same as it was previously, further
psychiatric reports are being sought by the prosecution.
It is true that cases can be delayed several times for reasons which
are entirely legitimate. Further evidence directly relating to the
immediate facts of the case, that is, what happened rather than why
it happened, may be being sought with a reasonable chance of
success. Examples would be where witnesses have not been interviewed
because they are not in the country, but are believed to be returning
in the foreseeable future or documents are being withheld by a body
such as a bank and their release or otherwise is the subject of
ongoing court action. But there is nothing like that here, for the
delay is simply down to further psychiatric reports being wanted.
That is something largely within the control of those commissioning
them. The fact that it is the prosecution which is asking for more
reports is highly significant because it suggests that the ones they
have already commissioned are not to their liking, that is, they are
detrimental to the prosecution.
The case is not that complex. The prosecution have the recording.
They have had ample time to test it to see if it has been tampered
with. As the delay in trying the case is ascribed solely to the need
for psychiatric reports, presumably the prosecution either have
witness statements from the person who filmed the incident and
possibly others amongst the
Read more at http://englandcalling.wordpress.com/2012/09/08/emma-west-trial-delayed-for-the-third-time/
Mel Rowing
Sep 8, 2012, 4:09:26 PM9/8/12
to
> The fact that it is the prosecution which is asking for more
> reports is highly significant because it suggests that the ones they
> have already commissioned are not to their liking, that is, they are
> detrimental to the prosecution.
Makes not the slightest difference. Whatever the report says, whether
> reports is highly significant because it suggests that the ones they
> have already commissioned are not to their liking, that is, they are
> detrimental to the prosecution.
it is used in evidence or not, a copy will have to be made available
to the defence under rules of disclosure.
> The case is not that complex.
Roger Dewhurst
Sep 8, 2012, 4:51:08 PM9/8/12
to
You can always be counted on to take the side of the authorities,
whoever they are. Had you been in Germany in the 1930s you would have
been among the first to shout Seig Heil.
Watch this:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/14875021/Liza%20Minelli%20-%20Cabaret%20%281972%29%20DVDRip%20%28SiRiUs%20sHaRe%29_3.avi
totallyconfused
Sep 8, 2012, 5:21:11 PM9/8/12
to
Psych, final CPS/prosecution statements/evidences, etc) are disclosed
more than 30-40 minutes before a hearing in the UK.
Statement of personal experience and anticodal experiences of many.
TC
Nigel Oldfield
Sep 8, 2012, 5:36:26 PM9/8/12
to
On 08/09/2012 20:39, RH wrote:
But there is nothing like that here, for the
> delay is simply down to further psychiatric reports being wanted.
> That is something largely within the control of those commissioning
> them. The fact that it is the prosecution which is asking for more
> reports is highly significant because it suggests that the ones they
> have already commissioned are not to their liking, that is, they are
> detrimental to the prosecution.
Just like Ian Huntley, the work that needs to be done can take time.
But there is nothing like that here, for the
> delay is simply down to further psychiatric reports being wanted.
> That is something largely within the control of those commissioning
> them. The fact that it is the prosecution which is asking for more
> reports is highly significant because it suggests that the ones they
> have already commissioned are not to their liking, that is, they are
> detrimental to the prosecution.
WM
Mel Rowing
Sep 8, 2012, 5:56:25 PM9/8/12
to
On Sep 8, 9:51 pm, Roger Dewhurst <dewhurst.ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 9, 8:09 am, Mel Rowing <mel.row...@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 8, 8:39 pm, RH <anywhere...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Emma West trial delayed for the third time
> > > The fact that it is the prosecution which is asking for more
> > > reports is highly significant because it suggests that the ones they
> > > have already commissioned are not to their liking, that is, they are
> > > detrimental to the prosecution.
>
> > Makes not the slightest difference. Whatever the report says, whether
> > it is used in evidence or not, a copy will have to be made available
> > to the defence under rules of disclosure.
>
> > > The case is not that complex.
>
> > How do you know? Are you involved in its preparation?
>
> All the evidence is and was immediately available to the prosecution.
>
> You can always be counted on to take the side of the authorities,
> whoever they are. Had you been in Germany in the 1930s you would have
> been among the first to shout Seig Heil.
No! But you might!
> On Sep 9, 8:09 am, Mel Rowing <mel.row...@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 8, 8:39 pm, RH <anywhere...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Emma West trial delayed for the third time
> > > The fact that it is the prosecution which is asking for more
> > > reports is highly significant because it suggests that the ones they
> > > have already commissioned are not to their liking, that is, they are
> > > detrimental to the prosecution.
>
> > Makes not the slightest difference. Whatever the report says, whether
> > it is used in evidence or not, a copy will have to be made available
> > to the defence under rules of disclosure.
>
> > > The case is not that complex.
>
> > How do you know? Are you involved in its preparation?
>
> All the evidence is and was immediately available to the prosecution.
>
> You can always be counted on to take the side of the authorities,
> whoever they are. Had you been in Germany in the 1930s you would have
> been among the first to shout Seig Heil.
I would not have shown my ignorance and would have shouted "Sieg
Heil !"
Zapp Brannigan
Sep 8, 2012, 9:13:14 PM9/8/12
to
"Roger Dewhurst" <dewhurs...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:dc39a74a-b5fb-4344...@rg9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 9, 8:09 am, Mel Rowing <mel.row...@btinternet.com> wrote:
>> On Sep 8, 8:39 pm, RH <anywhere...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Emma West trial delayed for the third time
>> > The fact that it is the prosecution which is asking for more
>> > reports is highly significant because it suggests that the ones they
>> > have already commissioned are not to their liking, that is, they are
>> > detrimental to the prosecution.
>>
>> Makes not the slightest difference. Whatever the report says, whether
>> it is used in evidence or not, a copy will have to be made available
>> to the defence under rules of disclosure.
>>
>> > The case is not that complex.
>>
>> How do you know? Are you involved in its preparation?
>
> All the evidence is and was immediately available to the prosecution.
>
> You can always be counted on to take the side of the authorities,
> whoever they are. Had you been in Germany in the 1930s you would have
> been among the first to shout Seig Heil.
Perhaps so, but on this point he is right. An undesirable psych report
>> On Sep 8, 8:39 pm, RH <anywhere...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Emma West trial delayed for the third time
>> > The fact that it is the prosecution which is asking for more
>> > reports is highly significant because it suggests that the ones they
>> > have already commissioned are not to their liking, that is, they are
>> > detrimental to the prosecution.
>>
>> Makes not the slightest difference. Whatever the report says, whether
>> it is used in evidence or not, a copy will have to be made available
>> to the defence under rules of disclosure.
>>
>> > The case is not that complex.
>>
>> How do you know? Are you involved in its preparation?
>
> All the evidence is and was immediately available to the prosecution.
>
> You can always be counted on to take the side of the authorities,
> whoever they are. Had you been in Germany in the 1930s you would have
> been among the first to shout Seig Heil.
cannot be suppressed by the CPS. Defence will have a copy, and be free to
call it in evidence.
DVH
Sep 9, 2012, 4:28:21 AM9/9/12
to
"Mel Rowing" <mel.r...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:c215f649-ad84-42b2...@p5g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
I believe she's already spent eleven days in prison, and she no longer has
custody of her child.
walt tonne
Sep 9, 2012, 6:08:02 AM9/9/12
to
DVH
Sep 9, 2012, 6:10:04 AM9/9/12
to
"walt tonne" <tonnew...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9bde7f93-623f-4093...@m3g2000vby.googlegroups.com...
> Fuck the degenerate faggot limey system.
abelard
Sep 9, 2012, 7:03:44 AM9/9/12
to
Tired
Sep 9, 2012, 9:24:04 AM9/9/12
to
DVH wrote:
:: "Mel Rowing" <mel.r...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
Job done, as far as some are concerned. People wont be as brave to express
their opinions.
Do you have any links to show that she lost custody of her child?
:: "Mel Rowing" <mel.r...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
their opinions.
Do you have any links to show that she lost custody of her child?
joeh
Sep 9, 2012, 7:09:54 PM9/9/12
to
On Sep 9, 11:10 am, "DVH" <d...@vhvhvhvh.com> wrote:
> "walt tonne" <tonnewalt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> "walt tonne" <tonnewalt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:9bde7f93-623f-4093...@m3g2000vby.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Fuck the degenerate faggot limey system.
>
> On what grounds?
St James's Park in the Toon.
> news:9bde7f93-623f-4093...@m3g2000vby.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Fuck the degenerate faggot limey system.
>
> On what grounds?
0 new messages