There is one word that simply cannot be uttered at any Democratic
Party functions: idea Even the "idea" of Democrats taking over the
house is forbidden, verboten, taboo with the party establishment.
The GOP has a lot of ideas. To be sure every last one of them is a
scam but even scams can be considered ideas.
The 0.01% national media love to gush "it's a horse race" as though
American voters have a choice.
But we know what that choice is:
Scam ideas or no ideas.
You won't ever hear Big Pharma sponsored 0.01% media anchor Bob
$chieffer asking the "tough" questions about Democratic Party ideas on
leveling wealth.
Nope, that ain't gonna happen. Bob $chieffer gets paid the big bucks
to preclude that from happening.
The only thing that compares to the Democratic Party lock down on
ideas is the bipartisan lock down on critical thinking following
9/11. That one was so successful that the anti-immigration movement
was able to use the threat of bin Laden coming across from Mexico as a
pretext for closing the border. That rational was so bogus it rivaled
any nonsense the generally open border always bat crap insane neocons
were able to muster.
And yet the high school drop out Minutemen actually got away with it.
We know who did that lock down: The media gush hyping "9/11 changed
EEEEEEEVERYthing" 24/7/52 for several years. [Don't even think about
questioning BushCo or you'll be branded a terrorist lover.]
We also know the purpose:
Any critical thought at all would get the camel's nose under the tent
and the entire eternal patriotic quagmire movement would collapse.
That happened anyway which just goes to show that these lock downs are
pretty easy to debunk.
There may be other factors with the current lock down, i.e., the
Democratic Party establishment is dumb and/or lazy and/or out of touch
and just wants to avoid being like the Repugs so much they've decided
to ban any mention of _any_ ideas whatsoever.
But it's hard not to compare the 2 lock downs. Only the reason for
this one is different. The media are getting paid by the 0.01% for
the Democratic Party idea lock down
> There is one word that simply cannot be uttered at any Democratic
> Party functions: idea Even the "idea" of Democrats taking over the
> house is forbidden, verboten, taboo with the party establishment.
> The GOP has a lot of ideas. To be sure every last one of them is a
> scam but even scams can be considered ideas.
> The 0.01% national media love to gush "it's a horse race" as though
> American voters have a choice.
> But we know what that choice is:
> Scam ideas or no ideas.
> You won't ever hear Big Pharma sponsored 0.01% media anchor Bob
> $chieffer asking the "tough" questions about Democratic Party ideas on
> leveling wealth.
> Nope, that ain't gonna happen. Bob $chieffer gets paid the big bucks
> to preclude that from happening.
> The only thing that compares to the Democratic Party lock down on
> ideas is the bipartisan lock down on critical thinking following
> 9/11. That one was so successful that the anti-immigration movement
> was able to use the threat of bin Laden coming across from Mexico as a
> pretext for closing the border. That rational was so bogus it rivaled
> any nonsense the generally open border always bat crap insane neocons
> were able to muster.
> And yet the high school drop out Minutemen actually got away with it.
> We know who did that lock down: The media gush hyping "9/11 changed
> EEEEEEEVERYthing" 24/7/52 for several years. [Don't even think about
> questioning BushCo or you'll be branded a terrorist lover.]
> We also know the purpose:
> Any critical thought at all would get the camel's nose under the tent
> and the entire eternal patriotic quagmire movement would collapse.
> That happened anyway which just goes to show that these lock downs are
> pretty easy to debunk.
> There may be other factors with the current lock down, i.e., the
> Democratic Party establishment is dumb and/or lazy and/or out of touch
> and just wants to avoid being like the Repugs so much they've decided
> to ban any mention of _any_ ideas whatsoever.
> But it's hard not to compare the 2 lock downs. Only the reason for
> this one is different. The media are getting paid by the 0.01% for
> the Democratic Party idea lock down
> > There is one word that simply cannot be uttered at any Democratic
> > Party functions: idea Even the "idea" of Democrats taking over the
> > house is forbidden, verboten, taboo with the party establishment.
> > The GOP has a lot of ideas. To be sure every last one of them is a
> > scam but even scams can be considered ideas.
> > The 0.01% national media love to gush "it's a horse race" as though
> > American voters have a choice.
> > But we know what that choice is:
> > Scam ideas or no ideas.
> > You won't ever hear Big Pharma sponsored 0.01% media anchor Bob
> > $chieffer asking the "tough" questions about Democratic Party ideas on
> > leveling wealth.
> > Nope, that ain't gonna happen. Bob $chieffer gets paid the big bucks
> > to preclude that from happening.
> > The only thing that compares to the Democratic Party lock down on
> > ideas is the bipartisan lock down on critical thinking following
> > 9/11. That one was so successful that the anti-immigration movement
> > was able to use the threat of bin Laden coming across from Mexico as a
> > pretext for closing the border. That rational was so bogus it rivaled
> > any nonsense the generally open border always bat crap insane neocons
> > were able to muster.
> > And yet the high school drop out Minutemen actually got away with it.
> > We know who did that lock down: The media gush hyping "9/11 changed
> > EEEEEEEVERYthing" 24/7/52 for several years. [Don't even think about
> > questioning BushCo or you'll be branded a terrorist lover.]
> > We also know the purpose:
> > Any critical thought at all would get the camel's nose under the tent
> > and the entire eternal patriotic quagmire movement would collapse.
> > That happened anyway which just goes to show that these lock downs are
> > pretty easy to debunk.
> > There may be other factors with the current lock down, i.e., the
> > Democratic Party establishment is dumb and/or lazy and/or out of touch
> > and just wants to avoid being like the Repugs so much they've decided
> > to ban any mention of _any_ ideas whatsoever.
> > But it's hard not to compare the 2 lock downs. Only the reason for
> > this one is different. The media are getting paid by the 0.01% for
> > the Democratic Party idea lock down
> > Bret Cahill
> Are the winners and losers of language games always the winners or
> losers of political games?
The OP wasn't about the specious arguments of looneytarians who, most
everyone agrees, have a sphere of influence the size of a ping pong
ball. It's not really about word games.
It's about party and media establishments. To be sure the NY Times
uses code words to vilify [censor] ideas but that's not the basic
thrust of the article.
> There is one word that simply cannot be uttered at any Democratic
> Party functions: idea Even the "idea" of Democrats taking over the
> house is forbidden, verboten, taboo with the party establishment.
> The GOP has a lot of ideas. To be sure every last one of them is a
> scam but even scams can be considered ideas.
The democrat idea is to smear anyone who dares propose any ideas and then push the country off a cliff in a wheelchair.
> There is one word that simply cannot be uttered at any Democratic
> Party functions: idea Even the "idea" of Democrats taking over the
> house is forbidden, verboten, taboo with the party establishment.
> The GOP has a lot of ideas. To be sure every last one of them is a
> scam but even scams can be considered ideas.
> The 0.01% national media love to gush "it's a horse race" as though
> American voters have a choice.
> But we know what that choice is:
> Scam ideas or no ideas.
If the Dems have no ideas, why do they exist as a political party?
Who/what formulates their agenda and devises their strategy for
implementing it?
What is their purpose?
(and why on earth are you a democrat? "Unaffiliated" is an option.)
> > There is one word that simply cannot be uttered at any Democratic
> > Party functions: idea Even the "idea" of Democrats taking over the
> > house is forbidden, verboten, taboo with the party establishment.
> > The GOP has a lot of ideas. To be sure every last one of them is a
> > scam but even scams can be considered ideas.
> > The 0.01% national media love to gush "it's a horse race" as though
> > American voters have a choice.
> > But we know what that choice is:
> > Scam ideas or no ideas.
> If the Dems have no ideas, why do they exist as a political party?
To oppose GOP scam ideas.
To be sure, this purely secondary role really works for the 0.01%.
> Who/what formulates their agenda and devises their strategy for
> implementing it?
The _New York Times_.
> What is their purpose?
The purpose of the New York Times pretend that they aren't getting
paid by the 0.01% to transfer wealth from the 99% to the 0.01%.
That's why they are always exclaiming that they "can't figger it out."
> (and why on earth are you a democrat?
Do you know anyone better at exposing GOP scam ideas?
With a single post I took out school vouchers.
"Vouchers for Home Skoolin'"
If you support vouchers and if you support home schooling, then it'll
take some purty fancy footwork to oppose vouchers for home schooling.
> On 6/30/2012 12:58 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:
>> There is one word that simply cannot be uttered at any Democratic
>> Party functions: idea Even the "idea" of Democrats taking over the
>> house is forbidden, verboten, taboo with the party establishment.
>> The GOP has a lot of ideas. To be sure every last one of them is a
>> scam but even scams can be considered ideas.
>> The 0.01% national media love to gush "it's a horse race" as though
>> American voters have a choice.
>> But we know what that choice is:
>> Scam ideas or no ideas.
> If the Dems have no ideas, why do they exist as a political party?
> Who/what formulates their agenda and devises their strategy for
> implementing it?
> What is their purpose?
I already told you. Their purpose is to smear anyone who proposes any ideas while pushing the country off a cliff in a wheelchair.
> > There is one word that simply cannot be uttered at any Democratic
> > Party functions: idea Even the "idea" of Democrats taking over the
> > house is forbidden, verboten, taboo with the party establishment.
> > The GOP has a lot of ideas. To be sure every last one of them is a
> > scam but even scams can be considered ideas.
> > The 0.01% national media love to gush "it's a horse race" as though
> > American voters have a choice.
> > But we know what that choice is:
> > Scam ideas or no ideas.
> If the Dems have no ideas, why do they exist as a political party?
> To oppose GOP scam ideas.
> To be sure, this purely secondary role really works for the 0.01%.
> Who/what formulates their agenda and devises their strategy for
> implementing it?
> The _New York Times_.
> What is their purpose?
> The purpose of the New York Times pretend that they aren't getting
> paid by the 0.01% to transfer wealth from the 99% to the 0.01%.
> That's why they are always exclaiming that they "can't figger it out."
> (and why on earth are you a democrat?
> Do you know anyone better at exposing GOP scam ideas?
> With a single post I took out school vouchers.
> "Vouchers for Home Skoolin'"
> If you support vouchers and if you support home schooling, then it'll
> take some purty fancy footwork to oppose vouchers for home schooling.
How'd you get your internet privileges back over at the asylum, blow the warden again?
Bret Cahill: Ryan wants to end Medicare because Hussein cut half a trillion from the program and the Bush tax cuts caused the financial crisis. People and businesses that make over 200K are millionaires, billionaires and corporate jet owners and it's time for the "rich" to pay their fair share because they pay the vast majority of income taxes while we need to raise the capital gains rate to reduce revenues as a matter of fairness because of the deficit.
There is one word that simply cannot be uttered at any Democratic
Party functions: idea Even the "idea" of Democrats taking over the
house is forbidden, verboten, taboo with the party establishment.
The GOP has a lot of ideas. To be sure every last one of them is a
scam but even scams can be considered ideas.
The 0.01% national media love to gush "it's a horse race" as though
American voters have a choice.
But we know what that choice is:
Scam ideas or no ideas.
You won't ever hear Big Pharma sponsored 0.01% media anchor Bob
$chieffer asking the "tough" questions about Democratic Party ideas
on
leveling wealth.
Nope, that ain't gonna happen. Bob $chieffer gets paid the big bucks
to preclude that from happening.
The only thing that compares to the Democratic Party lock down on
ideas is the bipartisan lock down on critical thinking following
9/11. That one was so successful that the anti-immigration movement
was able to use the threat of bin Laden coming across from Mexico as
a
pretext for closing the border. That rational was so bogus it
rivaled
any nonsense the generally open border always bat crap insane neocons
were able to muster.
And yet the high school drop out Minutemen actually got away with it.
We know who did that lock down: The media gush hyping "9/11 changed
EEEEEEEVERYthing" 24/7/52 for several years. [Don't even think about
questioning BushCo or you'll be branded a terrorist lover.]
We also know the purpose:
Any critical thought at all would get the camel's nose under the tent
and the entire eternal patriotic quagmire movement would collapse.
That happened anyway which just goes to show that these lock downs
are
pretty easy to debunk.
There may be other factors with the current lock down, i.e., the
Democratic Party establishment is dumb and/or lazy and/or out of
touch
and just wants to avoid being like the Repugs so much they've decided
to ban any mention of _any_ ideas whatsoever.
But it's hard not to compare the 2 lock downs. Only the reason for
this one is different. The media are getting paid by the 0.01% for
the Democratic Party lock down on ideas.
> > > There is one word that simply cannot be uttered at any Democratic
> > > Party functions: idea Even the "idea" of Democrats taking over the
> > > house is forbidden, verboten, taboo with the party establishment.
> > > The GOP has a lot of ideas. To be sure every last one of them is a
> > > scam but even scams can be considered ideas.
> > > The 0.01% national media love to gush "it's a horse race" as though
> > > American voters have a choice.
> > > But we know what that choice is:
> > > Scam ideas or no ideas.
> > > You won't ever hear Big Pharma sponsored 0.01% media anchor Bob
> > > $chieffer asking the "tough" questions about Democratic Party ideas on
> > > leveling wealth.
> > > Nope, that ain't gonna happen. Bob $chieffer gets paid the big bucks
> > > to preclude that from happening.
> > > The only thing that compares to the Democratic Party lock down on
> > > ideas is the bipartisan lock down on critical thinking following
> > > 9/11. That one was so successful that the anti-immigration movement
> > > was able to use the threat of bin Laden coming across from Mexico as a
> > > pretext for closing the border. That rational was so bogus it rivaled
> > > any nonsense the generally open border always bat crap insane neocons
> > > were able to muster.
> > > And yet the high school drop out Minutemen actually got away with it.
> > > We know who did that lock down: The media gush hyping "9/11 changed
> > > EEEEEEEVERYthing" 24/7/52 for several years. [Don't even think about
> > > questioning BushCo or you'll be branded a terrorist lover.]
> > > We also know the purpose:
> > > Any critical thought at all would get the camel's nose under the tent
> > > and the entire eternal patriotic quagmire movement would collapse.
> > > That happened anyway which just goes to show that these lock downs are
> > > pretty easy to debunk.
> > > There may be other factors with the current lock down, i.e., the
> > > Democratic Party establishment is dumb and/or lazy and/or out of touch
> > > and just wants to avoid being like the Repugs so much they've decided
> > > to ban any mention of _any_ ideas whatsoever.
> > > But it's hard not to compare the 2 lock downs. Only the reason for
> > > this one is different. The media are getting paid by the 0.01% for
> > > the Democratic Party idea lock down
> > > Bret Cahill
> > Are the winners and losers of language games always the winners or
> > losers of political games?
> The OP wasn't about the specious arguments of looneytarians who, most
> everyone agrees, have a sphere of influence the size of a ping pong
> ball. It's not really about word games.
> It's about party and media establishments. To be sure the NY Times
> uses code words to vilify [censor] ideas but that's not the basic
> thrust of the article.
> Bret Cahill
I suppose that political correctness, a word game, could be used to
limit choices to the point that they do not represent the available
array of options.
> There is one word that simply cannot be uttered at any Democratic
> Party functions: idea Even the "idea" of Democrats taking over the
> house is forbidden, verboten, taboo with the party establishment.
Damn, how many times do I have to tell you? The democrat idea is to smear any republican with ideas and run America off a cliff in a wheelchair.
