Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

If George W. Bush had.....

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Dionysus

unread,
Sep 9, 2009, 1:02:56 PM9/9/09
to
AN E-MAIL FROM A FRIEND

If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a teleprompter to be
able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said
this is more proof of how inept he is on his own and is really controlled
by smarter men behind the scenes?

If George W. Bush had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura
Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved, all the while preaching
that America is in a Financial Crisis?

If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan's holdings of GM
stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have
approved?

If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special
Olympics, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and
incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful
and historically significant gift, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing
videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly
narcissistic and tacky?

If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia , would you
have approved?

If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the
non-existent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor
slip?

If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with
people who cheat on their income taxes, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to
"Cinco de Cuatro" in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the fourth
of May (Cuatro de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again,
would you have winced in embarrassment?

If George W. Bush had mis-spelled the word advice would you have
hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoe as proof of what
a dunce he is?

If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a
single tree on Earth Day, would you have concluded he's a hypocrite?

If George W. Bush's administration had okayed Air Force One flying low
over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan
causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually get
what happened on 9-11?

If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims
throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in New
Orleans , would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with
claims of racism and incompetence?

If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major
corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would
you have approved?

If George W. Bush had proposed to double the national debt, which
had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, in only 3 months, would
you have approved?

If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10
years, would you have approved?

So, tell us again, what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant
and impressive? Can't think of anything? Don't worry. He's done all this
in 9 months -- so you'll have three years and three months to come up with
an answer.
*****************
"Who would have believed that this politician celebrated, above all, for his
eloquence and capacity to connect with voters would end up as president
proving so profoundly tone deaf?"--Dorothy Rabinowitz speaking of the Lyin'
Little Prick

Dionysus

Lars Eighner

unread,
Sep 9, 2009, 1:37:59 PM9/9/09
to
In our last episode, <D7SdnXECmKtfQjrX...@giganews.com>, the
lovely and talented Dionysus broadcast on alt.politics:

> AN E-MAIL FROM A FRIEND

> If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a teleprompter to be
> able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said
> this is more proof of how inept he is on his own and is really controlled
> by smarter men behind the scenes?

George Bush could not have been the first to use a teleprompter in a press
conference, since Reagan used them frequently.

> If George W. Bush had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura
> Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved, all the while preaching
> that America is in a Financial Crisis?

It sure would have been a money-saver compared to the 77 vacation trips he
took to Crawford at more than $200k a pop. That's nearly 10 a year, so
Obama's trips are way behind the curve in number and cost. (There were, of
course, more Bush trips to Kennybunkport, etc.) But Bush is white, so that
makes it okay.

> If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan's holdings of GM
> stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have
> approved?

And if Obama had stood by and let GM go under so your retirement plan's
holdings would be worth zip, what would you have said?

> If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing
> videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly
> narcissistic and tacky?

Yes. But Obama gave the Queen an iPod at the suggestion of the Palace, and
it was loaded with video of *her* visit to Jamestown.

> If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia , would you
> have approved?

Might have been better than walking through the Rose Garden holding his hand
like teenagers in love.

> If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with
> people who cheat on their income taxes, would you have approved?

He did, I didn't.

--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> September 5853, 1993
232 days since Rick Warren prayed over Bush's third term.
Obama: No hope, no change, more of the same. Yes, he can, but no, he won't.

Dionysus

unread,
Sep 9, 2009, 1:50:40 PM9/9/09
to

"Lars Eighner" <use...@larseighner.com> wrote in message
news:slrnhafpgf...@debranded.larseighner.com...

> In our last episode, <D7SdnXECmKtfQjrX...@giganews.com>, the
> lovely and talented Dionysus broadcast on alt.politics:
>
>> AN E-MAIL FROM A FRIEND
>
>> If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a teleprompter to
>> be
>> able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said
>> this is more proof of how inept he is on his own and is really
>> controlled
>> by smarter men behind the scenes?
>
> George Bush could not have been the first to use a teleprompter in a press
> conference, since Reagan used them frequently.
************
You're a liar

>
>> If George W. Bush had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to take
>> Laura
>> Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved, all the while preaching
>> that America is in a Financial Crisis?
>
> It sure would have been a money-saver compared to the 77 vacation trips he
> took to Crawford at more than $200k a pop. That's nearly 10 a year, so
> Obama's trips are way behind the curve in number and cost. (There were,
> of
> course, more Bush trips to Kennybunkport, etc.) But Bush is white, so
> that
> makes it okay.

You're a liar

>
>> If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan's holdings of
>> GM
>> stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have
>> approved?
>
> And if Obama had stood by and let GM go under so your retirement plan's
> holdings would be worth zip, what would you have said?
>
>> If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing
>> videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly
>> narcissistic and tacky?
>
> Yes. But Obama gave the Queen an iPod at the suggestion of the Palace,
> and
> it was loaded with video of *her* visit to Jamestown.

You're a liar


>> If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia , would you
>> have approved?
>
> Might have been better than walking through the Rose Garden holding his
> hand
> like teenagers in love.

You're a liar


>> If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers
>> with
>> people who cheat on their income taxes, would you have approved?
>
> He did, I didn't.

You're a liar

Dionysus

Lamont Cranston

unread,
Sep 9, 2009, 2:49:45 PM9/9/09
to
Lyin' Pindick Denis wrote:

> "Lars Eighner" <use...@larseighner.com> wrote in message
> news:slrnhafpgf...@debranded.larseighner.com...
>> In our last episode,
>> <D7SdnXECmKtfQjrX...@giganews.com>, the
>> lovely and
>> talented Dionysus broadcast on alt.politics:
>>> AN E-MAIL FROM A FRIEND
>>
>>> If George W. Bush had been the first President to need
>>> a
>>> teleprompter to be
>>> able to get through a press conference, would you have
>>> laughed and
>>> said this is more proof of how inept he is on his own
>>> and is really
>>> controlled
>>> by smarter men behind the scenes?
>>
>> George Bush could not have been the first to use a
>> teleprompter in a
>> press conference, since Reagan used them frequently.
> ************
> You're a liar

No, Denis, you're a liar. Every POTUS since Truman has used
a teleprompter including George W. Bush.

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/03/06/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry4848259.shtml

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/05/world/americas/05iht-prompt.4.20623004.html

>>
>>> If George W. Bush had spent hundreds of thousands of
>>> dollars to
>>> take Laura
>>> Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved, all the
>>> while
>>> preaching that America is in a Financial Crisis?
>>
>> It sure would have been a money-saver compared to the 77
>> vacation
>> trips he took to Crawford at more than $200k a pop.
>> That's nearly
>> 10 a year, so Obama's trips are way behind the curve in
>> number and
>> cost. (There were, of
>> course, more Bush trips to Kennybunkport, etc.) But Bush
>> is white,
>> so that
>> makes it okay.
>
> You're a liar

No, Denis, you're a liar. Bush did make 77 trips to
Crawford. Hell, he was on vacation for about a third of his
term of office.

http://mediamatters.org/research/200906010027

>
>>
>>> If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement
>>> plan's
>>> holdings of GM
>>> stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in
>>> GM, would
>>> you have approved?
>>
>> And if Obama had stood by and let GM go under so your
>> retirement
>> plan's holdings would be worth zip, what would you have
>> said?
>>
>>> If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an
>>> iPod
>>> containing videos of his speeches, would you have
>>> thought this
>>> embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?
>>
>> Yes. But Obama gave the Queen an iPod at the suggestion
>> of the
>> Palace, and
>> it was loaded with video of *her* visit to Jamestown.
>
> You're a liar

No, Denis, you're the liar. Obama gave the Queen an iPod
containing a video of her visit to Jamestown.

http://articles.latimes.com/2009/apr/02/world/fg-obama-queen2


>
>
>>> If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi
>>> Arabia ,
>>> would you have approved?
>>
>> Might have been better than walking through the Rose
>> Garden holding
>> his hand
>> like teenagers in love.
>
> You're a liar

No, Denis, you're the liar. Bush walked through the Rose
Garden holding hands with a Saudi prince.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0426/dailyUpdate.html


>
>
>>> If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle
>>> of advisers
>>> with
>>> people who cheat on their income taxes, would you have
>>> approved?
>>
>> He did, I didn't.
>
> You're a liar

No, Denis, you'r the liar. Bush appointed convicted felons
to positions in his administration.

http://www.oldamericancentury.org/bushco/bushcontra.htm


>
> Lyin' Pindick Denis

Dionysus

unread,
Sep 9, 2009, 2:46:57 PM9/9/09
to

"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont....@WhoKnows.com> wrote in message
news:h88t21$kbu$1...@news.datemas.de...

> Lyin' Pindick Denis wrote:
>
>> "Lars Eighner" <use...@larseighner.com> wrote in message
>> news:slrnhafpgf...@debranded.larseighner.com...
>>> In our last episode,
>>> <D7SdnXECmKtfQjrX...@giganews.com>, the lovely and
>>> talented Dionysus broadcast on alt.politics:
>>>> AN E-MAIL FROM A FRIEND
>>>
>>>> If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a
>>>> teleprompter to be
>>>> able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and
>>>> said this is more proof of how inept he is on his own and is really
>>>> controlled
>>>> by smarter men behind the scenes?
>>>
>>> George Bush could not have been the first to use a teleprompter in a
>>> press conference, since Reagan used them frequently.
>> ************
>> You're a liar
>
> No, Denis, you're a liar. Every POTUS since Truman has used a
> teleprompter including George W. Bush.
*********
Ah, Lamont, you of the clouded mind ...you don't undestand the joke between
Lars and me, so just go away. People are laughing at you.

Dionysus

Sid9

unread,
Sep 9, 2009, 5:01:38 PM9/9/09
to

"Dionysus" <no.sur...@never.net> wrote in message
news:dP2dnfznuam5ZTrX...@giganews.com...

Caught with your pants down?
You claim repeatedly calling him a liar is a joke?

You are the liar....!


phil scott

unread,
Sep 9, 2009, 5:46:20 PM9/9/09
to
Such a deal.

This is a long rant... all speculation. A total waste of time for
many, especially for those polarized onto one party or the other...
further what I am typing here is mostly my speculation and larger
observations.

It might point to answers on some inexplicable questions though..for
instance:

- Why does the US govt allow and encourage illegals?
- Why loan money at 5% for 30 years as you are at the same time
issuing trillions in funny money
that one would think would lead to hyper inflation.
- Why are so many moneyed interests selling gold and not buying it?

etc.

This is not a single issue, but my take on the larger scene... I am
not asserting I am correct.. this is just my speculation and I am not
interjecting my judgements on any of it.... I just think this is what
is going on from what I know of the scene...inside to some extent.

*******


I will begin with the moneyed interest and what I think is going on
there...

and I sure as hell do not mean to defend them..at all. But these do
have a ratiionale. I am attempting to sort out what that might
be...and if it comports with what can be seen happening.

I will end with wookie stories, since that has been my side of the
tracks so to speak personally.

There is 0.5% prime rate in Chilli. its heading into depression
also... and the prime rate for banks at less than 1% for banks in the
US, also headed into depression if not already there..... and yet home
buyers paying 5% on long term mortgages... thats a 400% net proft for
doing no work or value production at all for the moneyed
interests. but why?

******Won't hyper inflation render all their money useless?
*****

There is some huge range of ramifications in all that. These people
may be entirely corrupt, but they are not actually stupid perhaps...
and undoubtedly not totally corrupt in all aspects either.. Im
iincluding what some would call the worst in that class... the
bilderbergers et all. I am a view through clear glass here in an
attempt to see what is actually going on.

the good, the bad and the inexcusably ugly of it..... so if one
will pardon me then while I cease focus
on the easy targets.

If we end up with hyper inflation then all those banks, lenders,
pensioners and federal reserves etc will have virtually nothing but
worthless paper, as the citizens will own the real estate. and
have all the power and assets.

That is not going to happen .. That is an assumption on my part.
You may agree or not as you wish. For that to happen the moneyed
interests would want an empowered middle class. they dont imo.
I wont argue the point.

This raises the question .....why would the huge money interests, set
a deal up like that?
Makes no sense to me.

Unless they are staging for deflation and arranging deflation, in that
fashion these end up with a lot of strong currency, notes and
contracts enforced by law on *real assets. thats power .. useful
across a broad spectum.


.....and those of us they lent to at 5%, will be paying a premium
interest rate..in tough times, as the homes we bought devalues and
jobs get scarce. that 5% will loom large before its over.

This would make sense. That may be whats on the way. Regardless
their issuing of all that funny 'money'.

That may be Bernake's 'magic' bullet...

***


The other issues:

... as a wild guess it is considered that the world has between 300
and 600 trillion in bogus derivitives floating loose... much of it
will wash, one against the other, much of it will evaporate cleanly as
a few billion pensioners starve to death... the rest will be tied
irrevokably to real assets... puttng off a total collapse at least...
securing those, and the derivitives tied to them.


I am speculating that life on main street will get a lot tougher, and
these will be forced to live and pay rent, or mortgages, taxes and
etc..and over work... money scarce, the value of the assets remaining
relatively high because of all the illegals being encouraged to live
in the country (without the illegals, and with the baby boomer bust,
there will be 40 million surplus homes on the market, driving those
asset values to the bottom... no one to occupy the homes... so the
illegals are securing the moneyed interests in that aspect.

I believe that may be the primary reason these are encouraged....and
for other reasons, we need slave labor to compete in the world, and we
need to be able to tax that slave labor to near ruin in order to pay
for our govt bloat (70% over previous per capita levels just 30
years ago... its a tumor, gone cancerous, now devouring its host..
thats been common all through history). regardless, thats why we
need the slave labor.. without it
real estate and the value securing the moneyed loans would collapse,
the tax base would collapse...and with our talent pool (50% of the
entire work force, the most skilled) dying off ... we would be toast
as a nation.

that is not to say we are not toast as it is...

but but .. what of the funny money? well it was just credits, not
dollar bills, credit can be (and is) being reigned in as we speak.
Rendering the funny money a non issue as far as creating hyper
inflation is concerned... credit is just reigned it as times goes
along anytime it looks like anyone not in civil service might make a
few bucks... keeping govt costs low...whats left of the middle class
under control... and the bulk of the rest half starved.

(side note)... in 1975... 50 dollars an hour was a comon consulting
rate for free engineering free lancers... In 1982 my billing rate for
HVAC work, service and engineering was $40 dollars an hour. My
office rent was 75 dollars... a new car was 3 to 4,000 dollars.

Now, today... office rent if I had one would be in the $1,500 to
$2,000 range, an average car is 8 to 10 times higher... as some
consultants are still working for $50 an hour... a few can get a bit
more when there is work...but there is not much work... its moved to
china mostly.


**

so what we may have now, if my speculation holds any water, is
secured money interests (banks and international money
interests)...with that stability and *their power in tact for better
or worse... and the people merely having to work harder and longer
for a few decades to work off these loans, and keep the moneyed
interests secure. Thats how its set up I believe.. (I am sure sure
as hell not applauding it, this is just my take on the actuality of it
all.)


***
The upside?, no total crash as seen in the great depression, the
lowering of living standards offset by a built infrastructure,
automated farming and etc. In other words we floated this mess on a
sea of advanced technology... and on the backs of the human
beiings..and there are no other backs on which to float it... not so
many die off in the USA, the third world keeps suffering as usual.

that is the overlord thinking perhaps. I don't fault it or applaud
it. I just think thats what may be going on.

It is not a secret and I do not entirely disagree that something must
be done to stem the exponential growth of the human population... such
starvation and etc is probably seen as a necessary thing by those in
power, and it may be... and even in the USA, looking at whats running
loose these days , 60% of fat asses...with no brains, and scoring in
the bottom 2% literacy and math science in the developed world... that
simply and absolutely *cannot fly.


These will die off before its over imo...one way or the other...
historically its by means of military and economic defeat, then food
shortages, individual immune systems then go weak...... then pandemic
disease takes out half of the population... idiots first...

the surviving middle class then takes out the upper class.

That is simply the established pattern, not a single exception in
world history that I can recall.... maybe some reading this can spot
some exceptions though.


which track is the US demographic on? a person can
project outcomes from that curve.

***

What is an individual to do.. well we adapt..as usual..

failed strategies die out, others do not die out, those complicit with
the machine you might say will be the most viable, but at the cost of
their Humanity.. and extinction in the end.


Maybe that is what Star Wars was about... the dominance of the
machine, and the borg type situation etc. Obedience gone ballistic,
now common at the tellers window, or engineering offices, along with
the idiocy it takes to go along with such a program...


in oposition to the machine, a wookie, a couple of outcast gun
slingers,a rust bucket with hot cams, and a magic man or two, able
however to think for themselves... flexibly around mindless
defenses... alowing them to drop photon torpedo's down the death stars
vent tubes. This is a comon pattern in history also... the Bastile
so to speak was not so defensible after all.

also not defensible were the Knights Templar chain of castles along
the mediterainian sea, where Syria, Lebanon and points north are
now... these had 20' thick double walls, that went 40 or 50' into
solid rock so they couldnt be tunneled under, and a moat between...
yet just 20 years from their peak, with decades worth of stored
grain, water and gold... they collapsed totally. a worthwhile study
especially as compared to the larger pattern and what is happening the
US today... the knights templar were the most accomplished and feared
warriors... how long to wimp status? think about.... it is worth
your time.

half of a generation.. not a full generation but half life
of a generation, and the productive part of that half life.. 20
years. You see that number repeating in history. For instance the
USA students 20 or 30 years ago scored highest in the world iin Math
Science and literacy... now near dead last. 48th in the world behind
head hunters in Borneo.

*** a nation is built and survives on the strength of its *current
generation ONLY.***.. with a modest fly wheel effect from the previous
generation, that precludes their instantaneous demise.

Re our national security:

(in the US we are in a very similar situation. an entirely 100%
laughable situation if it were not so grim, an entirely undefensible
position. on US soil, our arch enemy already in place by the hundreds
of thousands... and only a handfull needed to render us into a
quivering mass of bankrupt non function and not the faintest chance of
preventing further assaults... and we are not talking IED's here in
the faintest

... I wont list the ways.. or what I learned from the CIA's analysis
of the scene..its not even remotely funny..we can be shut down in a
*heart beat... it simply does not serve our enemies interests to do
so.) Our presidents defense as loopy as I think GWB was, was still
perhaps the only choice he had, driven by the CIA analyisis of *our
own limitless vulnerabiltiy I mentioned.. That defence of being so
instantaneously insane and dangerous in a heart beat ....that messing
with us wouldnt be worth it.

Lacking that I and any engineer with half a brain can tell you, we can
be messed with effortlessly for under 20 dollars... unstoppably.. our
CIA knows this and more in every minute detail.).

***
We are not however set up to survive any sort of end stage, instead we
are across that threshold.


Each of us gets to choose in these regards. A rationalization to
sudden nearly unavoidable death, in a heart beat ....or the security
of the impenetrable death star... most chose that security.

it is an entirely false and humanly fatal security however.

***

Now in closing.. especially to the survivalist folk.. who think macho
cuts it. I want to introduce myself. Macho doesn't cut it. And
thats from me with a career on the high speed dirt ovals ... and more
than a few gun fights... I have been a reasonably nasty bastard in my
life. However it is not macho that cuts it.

The guts pays off, but not the macho... guts pays off because it takes
courage to be objective...ones only solution is in his own
objectivity... that is never abusive.

The most vicious bastards Id seen either on a race track or just
prior to a blood chilling bar brawl with cue sticks taking peoples
jaws off............ were polite as hell.


Phil scott

Dionysus

unread,
Sep 9, 2009, 8:58:20 PM9/9/09
to

"Sid9" <si...@belsouth.net> wrote in message
news:h8953m$g2i$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
**********
And you don't get the joke, fool. But it's not on you; you just stuck your
nose where it doesn't belong....fool.

Dionysus
>
>

khemyst

unread,
Sep 10, 2009, 6:51:55 AM9/10/09
to
Bammy boi is the first one to rely on them heavily to answer questions at
press meetings and to answer questions at town hall meetings. Previous
presidents used them for speeches exclusively, NOT to have handlers type
answers to questions from the press or the audience!


"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont....@WhoKnows.com> wrote in message
news:h88t21$kbu$1...@news.datemas.de...

Lars Eighner

unread,
Sep 10, 2009, 9:11:59 AM9/10/09
to
In our last episode, <4aa8da4c$0$30809$566...@news.usenetserver.com>, the
lovely and talented khemyst broadcast on alt.politics:

> Bammy boi is the first one to rely on them heavily to answer questions at
> press meetings and to answer questions at town hall meetings. Previous
> presidents used them for speeches exclusively, NOT to have handlers type
> answers to questions from the press or the audience!

Actual evidence that this ever happened: zip.

--
Lars Eighner <http://larseighner.com/> September 5854, 1993

Dionysus

unread,
Sep 10, 2009, 9:44:03 AM9/10/09
to

"Lars Eighner" <use...@larseighner.com> wrote in message
news:slrnhahu9o...@debranded.larseighner.com...

> In our last episode, <4aa8da4c$0$30809$566...@news.usenetserver.com>, the
> lovely and talented khemyst broadcast on alt.politics:
>
>> Bammy boi is the first one to rely on them heavily to answer questions at
>> press meetings and to answer questions at town hall meetings. Previous
>> presidents used them for speeches exclusively, NOT to have handlers type
>> answers to questions from the press or the audience!
>
> Actual evidence that this ever happened: zip.
**********
You are a liar.

Dionysus

Nickname unavailable

unread,
Sep 10, 2009, 10:18:20 AM9/10/09
to
On Sep 9, 4:01 pm, "Sid9" <s...@belsouth.net> wrote:
> "Dionysus" <no.surren...@never.net> wrote in message
>
> news:dP2dnfznuam5ZTrX...@giganews.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Crans...@WhoKnows.com> wrote in
> > messagenews:h88t21$kbu$1...@news.datemas.de...

> >> Lyin' Pindick Denis wrote:
>
> >>> "Lars Eighner" <use...@larseighner.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:slrnhafpgf...@debranded.larseighner.com...
> >>>> In our last episode,
> >>>> <D7SdnXECmKtfQjrXnZ2dnUVZ_jOdn...@giganews.com>, the

> >>>> lovely and
> >>>> talented Dionysus broadcast on alt.politics:
> >>>>> AN E-MAIL FROM A FRIEND
>
> >>>>> If George W.  Bush had been the first President to
> >>>>> need a
> >>>>> teleprompter to be
> >>>>> able to get through a press conference, would you have
> >>>>> laughed and
> >>>>> said this is more proof of how inept he is on his own
> >>>>> and is really
> >>>>> controlled
> >>>>> by smarter men behind the scenes?
>
> >>>> George Bush could not have been the first to use a
> >>>> teleprompter in a
> >>>> press conference, since Reagan used them frequently.
> >>> ************
> >>> You're a liar
>
> >> No, Denis, you're a liar.  Every POTUS since Truman has
> >> used a teleprompter including George W. Bush.
> > *********
> > Ah, Lamont, you of the clouded mind ...you don't undestand
> > the joke between Lars and me, so just go away. People are
> > laughing at you.
>
> > Dionysus
>
> >>http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/03/06/politics/politicalhotsheet/en...
>
> >>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/05/world/americas/05iht-prompt.4.20623...

he is also this, REPUBLICANS VALUE PROFITS OVER DECENCY:)

Bret Cahill

unread,
Sep 10, 2009, 10:28:20 AM9/10/09
to
> You're a liar


> You're a liar


> You're a liar


> You're a liar


> You're a liar


> Dionysus


Very informative. Lots of facts and reasoning.

Is this how Repugliars plan to get back into power?


Bret Cahill

Lamont Cranston

unread,
Sep 10, 2009, 11:28:47 AM9/10/09
to
Lyin' Pindick Denis wrote:
> "Lars Eighner" <use...@larseighner.com> wrote in message
> news:slrnhahu9o...@debranded.larseighner.com...
>> In our last episode,
>> <4aa8da4c$0$30809$566...@news.usenetserver.com>, the
>> lovely and
>> talented khemyst broadcast on alt.politics:
>>> Bammy boi is the first one to rely on them heavily to
>>> answer
>>> questions at press meetings and to answer questions at
>>> town hall
>>> meetings. Previous presidents used them for speeches
>>> exclusively,
>>> NOT to have handlers type answers to questions from the
>>> press or
>>> the audience!
>>
>> Actual evidence that this ever happened: zip.
> **********
> You are a liar.

No, Denis, you, as always, are the liar.

>
> Denis

Dionysus

unread,
Sep 10, 2009, 11:48:53 AM9/10/09
to

"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont....@WhoKnows.com> wrote in message
news:h8b5l7$oqt$1...@news.datemas.de...
************
And, again, Clouded Mind, you don't know the joke, so you don't get it. Got
it!

Dionysus
>
>>
>> Denis
>

Dionysus

unread,
Sep 10, 2009, 11:49:36 AM9/10/09
to

"Bret Cahill" <Bret_E...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0c1a1200-fd0d-4cb3...@y10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
************
And you don't get the joke, either.

Dionysus
>
>
>

ArmyOfDorkness

unread,
Sep 10, 2009, 1:26:01 PM9/10/09
to

"Bret Cahill" <Bret_E...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0c1a1200-fd0d-4cb3...@y10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

It's all they have.


>
>
> Bret Cahill
>
>
>

0 new messages